Regards from Sochi, Russia ! For information: The MC-21 is a Russian medium-haul narrow-body passenger aircraft. The MC-21 family program is being developed by Yakovlev Corporation, together with the Yakovlev Aviation Design Bureau which is part of it. Perhaps in the future (after the start of serial production of aircraft) the MС-21 will be named - Yakovlev Yak-242 .
@@nntflow7058 And which aircraft manufacturer will replace Airbus!? Have you heard the news that airlines have started massively canceling the A220, not only orders, but selling planes that have not even been in service for a month, because that plane is, in terms of quality and safety, to say the least... shit!
The Russians product varieties aviation machines as the Jspanese produce Cars....mind blowing. This is what a functional and serious engineers and scientists can do when they mean business.
civil aircraft market is highly dependent on politics. I would expect that its usage wont be any significant outside Russia itself and may be its closest partners, but would also depend on their ability to reach high production volumes
problem with Russian equipment after sale support. If Russia estabilished that then lot of countries will buy it. Or Russia should go into joint ventures.@@RayVideo
@@Hkchinese888 countries in the West are changing politics from left to right. Sanctions backfired big time and the west will understand that it is time to say goodbye to USA. USA been profiting from the sanctions. It will take time but the West will wake up from the (woke) and USA hegemony. Besides that, there are more and more BRICS countries to fly to. BRICS knows that the west is stupid to not follow them. Follow the Money: petrodollar coming to an end.
Yes, it is true. But Em-See is so widely used in the latin alphabet World, so UAC (the manufacturer) decided: OK, let it be Em-See if you want. So Em-Es in Russian and Em-See in English is OK both. It is not incorrect or wrong.
Russians not hamstrung by DEI diversity hiring. Also their engineers are allowed to do quality instead of chasing profits. Looks a lot like Boeing from the 1960s, so good things ahead for Russia.
This is a nice plane, especially for Russia, but dont mistake that for them being superior or even a contemporary to America's abilities. The US leads the planet in basically every important industry by a mile.
I was hoping to get projected performance figures for the plane like range, average cruise speeds, service ceilings, costs and all the other fun stuff.
The engines need a full overhaul every 3600 hours... Kind of military jets grade thing. Airlines will love it. See how much time Cubana's TU204 and IL96 spent on overhauls lately.
163- 211- passengers. The maximum flight range reaches 6400 km, 21300 kg is the maximum commercial load. Cruising speed is 870 km/h. PD-14 engine - Life before the first repair of the pump block is 20,000 hours, before the first repair of all ACS units-14 - 40 000 ch. The operating time for an unavoidable in-flight engine shutdown is > 200,000 hours. The reliability of the aircraft departure, related to the readiness of the engine > 99.96%. Engine noise is 15-20 dB less than the requirement of Chapter 4 of the ICAO standard. Reduction of the level of nitrogen oxide NOx emissions relative to the ICAO standards of 2008 > 30%.
163- 211- passengers. The maximum flight range reaches 6400 km, 21300 kg is the maximum commercial load. Cruising speed is 870 km/h. PD-14 engine - Life before the first repair of the pump block is 20,000 hours, before the first repair of all ACS units-14 - 40 000 ch. The operating time for an unavoidable in-flight engine shutdown is > 200,000 hours. The reliability of the aircraft departure, related to the readiness of the engine > 99.96%. Engine noise is 15-20 dB less than the requirement of Chapter 4 of the ICAO standard. Reduction of the level of nitrogen oxide NOx emissions relative to the ICAO standards of 2008 > 30%.
One can appreciate quality products with appropriate engineering design, and manufacturing excellence. I compliment the competitive effort and wish for more choices that meet world standards.
@@bayouflier6641Sarmat's effectiveness is not in question; it's merely that you haven't experienced its capabilities-something we should all hope remains the case. After the USSR's dissolution, Russia's aviation sector saw a decline but has since been making significant strides in a complex and sophisticated field. Since 2011, the Sukhoi Superjet 100 has been successfully operating in the commercial sector, , exemplifying the resurgence of Russian aviation. I encourage you to educate yourself on Russia's aviation history and its current advancements, including the Ilyushin and Antonov aircraft, known for producing some of the world's largest and respected cargo planes, alongside other notable entities like Beriev, Aviakor, Irkutsk Aviation, Sukhoi, Tupolev, Kuznetsov Design, Yakovlev, UAC, and more. Your lack of knowledge and predisposition to negativity reflect poorly on you, not on the reality of Russia's aerospace achievements. The country continues to build on its legacy as a pioneer in space exploration and aviation, holding numerous records and innovations. Russian rocket engines, known for their unparalleled power, are used globally, including in Western spacecraft. Moreover, Russia's leadership in hypersonic missile technology is undisputed, with capabilities the West has yet to match. Disparaging the Russian aerospace and aviation industries without acknowledging these facts only highlights ignorance. Instead of harboring resentment, perhaps take a moment to appreciate the advancements and learn something new. And maybe, for now, steer clear of certain other western aerospace products (Boeing MAX for example) to ensure you're around to see how global aerospace dynamics continue to evolve while witnessing the western demise as it unfolds infront of us as we speak.
The only problem is it doesn't exist, it's been 7 years since the first flight, at this rate it will be obsolete by the time it's released, if it ever happens
Reality: The MC-21 is currently 13 years behind the original schedule for series production. Producer Rostec recently announced that no more civil aircraft (Mc 21, SSJ-100, Tu-214 etc) will be delivered before 2026. So far, it has always turned out that Russian aircraft are unreliable and far too expensive to maintain. Sukhoi SS100 has been in series production since 2010 to 2020 and has a market share of 0.0x% outside of Russia. Russian civil products are not at world market level - in any area! Like a developing country, Russia lives from the sale of its raw materials. 90% of export money comes from raw material, steal, aluminum etc.
I don't know how many of them were produced, but I recently saw this plane at the airport when I went on vacation.It's a pity I flew on the A320 and not on the MC21
There are a few problems. The PD-14 is not ready yet for commercial use. In comparison to the PW engines it is less efficient. The active stick steering system comes from France. The composite material comes from the USA. The PW engines are from the USA. All that is under sanction by now. The MC-21 cannot compete with the A320 and the C919. Therefore, it will not be a product that can be sold outside of Russia. This makes it virtually dead.
NO ONE doubt Russian capablities in aerospace. the problem with Russia has always something to do with market (market population, marketing, etc.) I am NOT sure if C919 is better than MC-21 technically at the beginning, but I am quite sure that C919 will have much higher chance to be successful commercially
I saw that behemoth Russian transport, musta been 89 maybe 90 at an airshow in Everett, WA. The main landing gear on that thing had more tires than Goodyear. And there was security ropes all the way around to keep people from getting too close. But some yeahoo still went inside the ropes and put a "buy American" bumper sticker on one of the tires 😂.
Russian aircraft? Give me a break! I don't trust Russian and Chinese aircrafts! You'll never destroy my trust of Boeing and Airbus. They have been tested and proven reliable.
As pessoas insistem em grandes números de passageiros, se fosse assim era só cada companhia aerea comprar um 747 e resolveriam todos os problemas, nao adianta o avião ter 200, 300 , 500 lugares se nao lota nem 50% da aeronave.
Given that many airlines are subject to Government whims, I can't see many European airlines giving the thing house-room. On a similar basis, I can't see many European passengers wanting to fly on it, either.
A plane launched in 2007, that still has not one buyer, not even Aeroflot (to my knowledge) is suppoed to be the most revolutionary of all? Even Putin is laughing at this documentary.
Aeroflot group - 50 planes, Ilyushin finance - 50, GTLK/VEB Leasing - 30, SberLeasing - 20, Utair - 10, Irareo - 10. The delivery of the first 6 aircrafts for Aeroflot group (Rossiya Airlines) is planned on the end of 2024 depending on certification of MC-21-310 RUS modification.
The MC-21 and China's C-919 are two up and coming commercial aircrafts with scientific innovation new materials and designs. Good looking and well designed with excellent and promising future.
especially since the comac is so heavily relied on western parts, especially its avionics by rockwell collins. All of which Russia does not have access to.
The west wants your to believe the sanctions sent russia back to the stone age, all it is doing is harming the west for europe its energy expenses, for america its eroding at the USD being the reserve currency. From our inflation rate, how much money they put into circulation along with playing games is making our currency riskier for any independent nation to trust
It seems like the only company with the expertise to make a plane the same level of A320 and B737Max is Embraer. Also the only company with the necessary worldwide reputation to compete Airbus and Boeing somehow, imo
Russians can build safe efficient modern airliners, their problem during times of better relations with the west was their support network, they didn’t have the supply chain or the logistics to get replacement part’s delivered in a timely manner. The ssj failed in mexico and Ireland because of this. Like waiting 2 months to get a gasket.
@@stephenfazekas5054 exactly. They had a big chance with the SSJ and didn‘t meet expectations. Without any sanctions. Also production rates are very low, they will need all for the domestic market.
Good luck seeing this anytime soon. It was only 38% domestically produced initially with engines, avionics, flight controls, and more all produced by US and European manufacturers. Those suppliers are gone now. Russia has to rework the plane for domestic parts which is why the launch is pushed out 3 years now. I'd expect more.
Good to see a brand new aircraft, I cannot even remember last time that occurred here in the west. I wish it success and a bright future, lord knows we need some new input and innovation.
Great Europeans, developing great aircraft. The A321XLR is the greatest plane of the decade. Let’s invite Ukrainians and (once the invasion is over) Russians to join.
Engines from Pratt&Whitney/USA, active sidestick from UTAS/France, composite materials from the USA etc. After changing the engines to the Russian PD-14 and replacing the American composite materials by Russian materials the MC-21 is no longer competitive to the A320 series.
@@Ljet600 I'm not just know the abbreviations. I even know what do they mean. No Russian planes have or will have EASA or FAA in next decade or even more. And so what?
@@KVentz , The problem is that Russian aircraft have no chance on the international market because they do not meet international standards. Russian standards are much lower than Western standards. The MS21 passenger evacuation test is a case in point. This is not what EASA or FAA requires, it is kindergarten. Would you want to fly such an aircraft? I wouldn't.
@@Ljet600 Russian standards are not lower than Western standards. This is a fake. SSJ-100 and Tu-204 already had EASA and FAA certificates till 2022. And MC-21 could have it but will never have because of Western politics only, not because of lower standards. Yes, none of Russian aircrafts today and in the future have a chance on Western market. Like Russian airlines don't have a chance to fly to Western countries in the next decades. Not a problem. The World is large. It's not only US and EU.
This aircraft made it's first flight in 2017, thats 7 years ago now. In comparason the a220/C Series made it's first flight in 2013 and entered into service in 2016. With the sanctions against Russia this plane wont enter service in the next 10 years either, if ever. This video is just propaganda and there is no point writing this comment because it will most likley be removed.
In each MC-21 video here on YT I see these comments on its "correct" English spelling. It's useless to appeal to the original Russian letters. Internationally it will still be known as MC (EmSee), due to the fact that the original cyrillic letters exist in latin alphabet. You should accept that. And by the way, it's only good for the brand - it's the same for the domestic and international market.
@@KVentz we have no reason to buy russian planes as we are doing much better with the likes of Airbus. Western avionics, western engines. The fact that before the war even russia used western planes and used western avionics says alot.
@@TomNyon It was not because western avionics was better. Tt's because it was cheaper and faster to buy already developed and globally certified avionics instead of making own from the scratch. Now there are no options. OK, not a problem, Russians are making own avionics, western companies lost Russian market forever.
@@KVentz I doubt boeing or airbus care about the Russian market, especially since they have their property. If you think Russia loved its own airplanes more why did aeroflot, rossiya and s7 for example have a a near western only fleet if local was cheaper anyway? Its not that i dont think they can i just think it wont be on par with current western technology.
@@TomNyon >I doubt boeing or airbus care Boeing and Airbus lost billions. They sales market, design centers. Of course you didn't know that they had large design centers in Russia and Russian engineers took part in the creation of all modern A and B aircrafts. So they care. >If you think Russia loved its own airplanes I did not say that. >why did aeroflot, rossiya and s7 for example have a a near western only fleet Because there were no Russian planes. SSJ-100 was the first modern aircraft, but it is a regional one, smaller than the most popular medium-haul planes like A320 and 737. Airlines dedicated to regional flights have SSJ-100: Rossiya, Azimut (they have SSJ-100 only fleet), Yamal, Red Wings and so on.
I was at Paris Air Show. Everyone was nice,; Boeing, Airbus, SAAB etc... Brazilians were brilliant. The only completely "what do you want?" were the Russians
I would like to be sure how much of this MC-21 hype video is from the westernized version, and how much is from the Russian one. The cockpit for instance smells like western tech for a mile.
@@antwainebarkley9765 Jealousy? The question is the usual Russian hype "we're the best" videos full of falsehoods. If Russia has advanced avionics why does the "brand new and very advanced" iteration of the IL96 has a cockpit with avionics similar to the 60's IL62, that even needs 3 in the cockpit? And yes that can be seen clearly on the official IL96 video just a few months old. Can Russia engineers do good things? Yes. But the sad fact is that they're decades behind the western companies in civil aviation.
this plane is so good that when the US oficials or spies saw it in dubai air show they got into panic and start throwing sanctions against the manufacturer with the objective to stop the project they throw sanctions against the wings manufacturer wich it was in japan, the engine wich was the PW1000G, and many systems all this delay the project but as you can see it will not stop it....
LOL RUssia can't even keep their own fighter jets in the air without cobbling parts from old planes. Apart from the dozen other reasons apart from supply chain and stolen tech, it's a russian plane that's never been sold before. Good luck with that one, you're buying confidence not just a plane and no amount of propaganda can fake that.
Don't be silly. Even with the P&W engine it was far behind the 737 max. Just remember....everyone who bought the Sukhoi Superjet ended up returning them because they were USELESS at providing spares. It's the same for the Mc21. They reckon they can make 20 a YEAR...when Airbus make that in 10 days and Boeing in 15 days. You are totally DREAMING.
@@nntflow7058 200+ SSJ-100 was made, most of them are flying in Russia perfectly. There could be even more of them, but they have to many foreign components. So Russia had to replace all of them including engines: construct and certify. First localised SSJ-100 have its first flight in august 2023. Last thing is PD-8 engines, they will be certified this year.
@@KVentz Actually, there are only 141 of them to be exact. in Russia. But they are using western components, not just the engines. Currently there are 0 all Russian made SS100 flying around in the air anywhere.
@@nntflow7058 There are no all Russian made SS100 flying because all Russian made SS100 project was start in 2022. And first flight already was last year.
@@bomcabedal No, it's an elongated diamond shape kiddo. Stop yapping if you don't know anything about the aviation industry. You don't even know what tube looks like apparently.
sure it would be the most innovative as it’s already 10 years or more that it’s been in design and development. one plane has been actually built. when I see babushkas designing such an innovative plane one thing is clear that it will fall even oftener than super jet
All Soviet/Russian aircrafts always were obsolete copies of western models and technologies. This "innovative" plane is the first attempt to use the compound instead of aluminum for the body and wings, like Boeing 787. But, surprisingly, Russia cannot buy this material abroad anymore. The technology needs to stolen and factory needs to be built. All of that will happen, undoubtedly. The quality and endurance of the future output of non-existing factory is a huge question. Question number two is the absence of good engine. There is nothing even remotely comparable with get engines produced for Boeing and Airbus. Thus, MS-21 project most likely will be the failure and catastrophe just like the previous SuperJet 100.
Soviet and Russian aircrafts can not be a copy, just because nobody gave a documentation or a piece for disassembling. What technology in aviation was stolen by Russia? And why USA has researched soviet MIG planes? Russia already has created engine PD-14, and is working on other engines. SSJ is not a catastrophe. This was the good jet, the only mistake was the supply of parts. Now it is reworked and almost 100% domestic SSJ New.
The Boeing concept is designed so that the owner of the aircraft can earn more. MC 21 is made primarily for the passenger, safety and comfort are two key parameters. For example, two large doors in the middle of the plane, they eat up a lot of space (in Boeing these are small hatches with additional seats), yes, this is true, but leaving the plane through them is much more convenient and safer.
To many words, not enough data! For this plane to fly, it needs spare parts at every flight destination. Creating that takes years and can bankrupt the manufacturer. Russians are not known for Supply-Chain excellency. To land in the US, there has to be a certification - remember the Concorde?
I doubt if everything is in order and even if spare parts are made available at every potential destination the likes of the US and EU will issue the required certifications for it's operation in the US and EU. Remember what happened with the newly built Nord Stream pipeline? For no real reason except for political reasons the Germans (at the urging of the US) refused to certify that NS pipelineand intentionally delayed and dragged their feet for months. It was later damaged by explosives planted & detonated by 'persons unknown' 😏
@@LFMC1 Your arrogance don't give you even a chance to realize that the world is not limited to Western countries. But it's not a problem of Russia. Russia will survive without the West.
Designing an aircraft is the simpler part of the story - manufacturing it is the harder one. Especially when the fascist Russian Federation is cut off of Western supplies of chips, jet engines etc. I'm really sorry for the designers of the MC-21.
Its MS-21 not MC-21 😂😅 Russia has his own alphabet 😂 like they have their own geolocalisation system (GLONASS) they don’t use GPS like they have their own social networks, their own culture, their own traditions, their own vision, their own religion, their own everything That’s why the collective west are so upset about Russia! Still a lil problem : Russia also have 6000 nuclear warheads! That’s why the USA haven’t find yet some oil and gas in Russia 🇷🇺
MS-21-300 (western engines) and MS-21-310 (russian engines) have different production dates. MS-21-300 was supposed to be produced since 2022, but now it won't be. MS-21-310 should be produced since 2024-2025. There is less than a year left before the release of the first MS-21. There are already about 20 airplanes on the production line. The hundredth MS-21 will be released in 2028. The thousandth MS-21 will be released in 2040.
It is not like Russian companies have the same access to financing as companies from rich countries have. They are getting things done on a shoestring funding.
No, south Asia, Africa, Middle East, Latin America. Places where real economic growth is changing people's live allowing them to fly in record numbers. You must watch MS media.
@@geoffrey5665Too bad I don’t care am still gonna avoid Airbus and fly Boeing. The 737 Max 8 by Southwest is the most common plane I have been on and am alive so don’t make jokes because if you somehow impossibly make a plane in 2 seconds it will break apart
Biggest Passenger Aircraft: Manufacturing an Airbus A380
th-cam.com/video/fcENLezYGOQ/w-d-xo.html
Looking forward for the MS 21 to replace the crap from Boeing nowadays
Sorry, but the only aircraft manufacturer replacing boeing is Airbus.
Whrn Kenian flight fell down Boing stated "that safety" is an option, which they haven't opted!
And updated, not using yokes. Like the modern planes,: sidesticks...
Regards from Sochi, Russia !
For information:
The MC-21 is a Russian medium-haul narrow-body passenger aircraft. The MC-21 family program is being developed by Yakovlev Corporation, together with the Yakovlev Aviation Design Bureau which is part of it.
Perhaps in the future (after the start of serial production of aircraft) the MС-21 will be named - Yakovlev Yak-242 .
@@nntflow7058 And which aircraft manufacturer will replace Airbus!?
Have you heard the news that airlines have started massively canceling the A220, not only orders, but selling planes that have not even been in service for a month, because that plane is, in terms of quality and safety, to say the least... shit!
The Russians product varieties aviation machines as the Jspanese produce Cars....mind blowing. This is what a functional and serious engineers and scientists can do when they mean business.
I hope the MC-21 is wildly successful. I hope this is not just a fluff piece.
civil aircraft market is highly dependent on politics. I would expect that its usage wont be any significant outside Russia itself and may be its closest partners, but would also depend on their ability to reach high production volumes
You have no idea. All BRICS countries are doing business with Russia.
They definitely will be interested in the Russian airliner.
problem with Russian equipment after sale support. If Russia estabilished that then lot of countries will buy it. Or Russia should go into joint ventures.@@RayVideo
@@RayVideo Please tell why the Brics countries have to buy it? Can it fly to the western world airports?
@@Hkchinese888 countries in the West are changing politics from left to right. Sanctions backfired big time and the west will understand that it is time to say goodbye to USA.
USA been profiting from the sanctions.
It will take time but the West will wake up from the (woke) and USA hegemony.
Besides that, there are more and more BRICS countries to fly to.
BRICS knows that the west is stupid to not follow them.
Follow the Money: petrodollar coming to an end.
Great aircraft, thank you for the video!
Any Russian would read it MS (Not MC)
It actually EM-ES (магистральный самолет, magistralnyi samoliot - mainline aircraft), not EM-SEE
@@lucem.glorifico Let me switch to my cyrilic keyboard - МС = MS in my latin keyboard.
@@AleksaAdzic yes, but as you can see this aircraft is always called "Em-See 21" instead of correct "Em-Es 21" on this video.
Yes, it is true. But Em-See is so widely used in the latin alphabet World, so UAC (the manufacturer) decided: OK, let it be Em-See if you want. So Em-Es in Russian and Em-See in English is OK both. It is not incorrect or wrong.
@@KVentz ok, let it be "Mainline airCraft - 21" 😆
Good luck and it will be nice to have many competitors in the market to keep prices down and high quality. Win win for customers.
Russians not hamstrung by DEI diversity hiring. Also their engineers are allowed to do quality instead of chasing profits. Looks a lot like Boeing from the 1960s, so good things ahead for Russia.
LMAO
You'll get hired for your comedy statements mate.
LOL 😂 😂 the lied these russians tell themself.
This is a nice plane, especially for Russia, but dont mistake that for them being superior or even a contemporary to America's abilities. The US leads the planet in basically every important industry by a mile.
@@PenskePC17 They don't lead civil aviation. AIRBUS has surpassed them
I was hoping to get projected performance figures for the plane like range, average cruise speeds, service ceilings, costs and all the other fun stuff.
Not in this lifetime lol!
The engines need a full overhaul every 3600 hours... Kind of military jets grade thing. Airlines will love it.
See how much time Cubana's TU204 and IL96 spent on overhauls lately.
163- 211- passengers.
The maximum flight range reaches 6400 km,
21300 kg is the maximum commercial load.
Cruising speed is 870 km/h.
PD-14 engine - Life before the first repair of the pump block is 20,000 hours, before the first repair of all ACS units-14 - 40 000 ch.
The operating time for an unavoidable in-flight engine shutdown is > 200,000 hours.
The reliability of the aircraft departure, related to the readiness of the engine > 99.96%.
Engine noise is 15-20 dB less than the requirement of Chapter 4 of the ICAO standard.
Reduction of the level of nitrogen oxide NOx emissions relative to the ICAO standards of 2008 > 30%.
163- 211- passengers.
The maximum flight range reaches 6400 km,
21300 kg is the maximum commercial load.
Cruising speed is 870 km/h.
PD-14 engine - Life before the first repair of the pump block is 20,000 hours, before the first repair of all ACS units-14 - 40 000 ch.
The operating time for an unavoidable in-flight engine shutdown is > 200,000 hours.
The reliability of the aircraft departure, related to the readiness of the engine > 99.96%.
Engine noise is 15-20 dB less than the requirement of Chapter 4 of the ICAO standard.
Reduction of the level of nitrogen oxide NOx emissions relative to the ICAO standards of 2008 > 30%.
Характеристики[115] МС-21-200 МС-21-310 МС-21-400
Длина самолёта (м) 33,8 42,3 46,7
Размах крыла (м) 35,9 35,9 36,8
Высота самолёта (м) 11,5 11,5 12,7
Ширина салона (м) 3,81 3,81 3,81
Ширина фюзеляжа (м) 4,06 4,06 4,06
Максимальная взлётная масса (кг) 72 560 85 000 87 230
Максимальная посадочная масса (кг) 63 100 73 500 ?
Максимальная коммерческая нагрузка (кг) 18 900 21 300 ?
Максимальная заправка топливом (кг) 20 400 20 400 ?
Максимальная дальность полёта в двухклассной компоновке, км 6400 5100 6000
Число пассажирских мест,
типовая 2-классная компоновка кресел 132
(C12+Y120) 163
(C16+Y147) 196
(C20+Y176)
Типовая 1-классная компоновка кресел[116][117] 153 (32″) 181 (32″) 210 (32″)
Предельно плотная компоновка кресел 165 (29″) 211 (29-28″) 230 (29-28″)
Great aerodynamic design , slim and smart fuselage compatible with 737-300
Very nice plane. Impressive technology and quality. I'd rather fly in this than a Boeing or Airbus. ❤🎉
Beautiful machine
One can appreciate quality products with appropriate engineering design, and manufacturing excellence. I compliment the competitive effort and wish for more choices that meet world standards.
@@bayouflier6641 Sarmat!
@@bayouflier6641 su 35, mi 28, ka 52 etc
@@bayouflier6641Sarmat's effectiveness is not in question; it's merely that you haven't experienced its capabilities-something we should all hope remains the case.
After the USSR's dissolution, Russia's aviation sector saw a decline but has since been making significant strides in a complex and sophisticated field. Since 2011, the Sukhoi Superjet 100 has been successfully operating in the commercial sector, , exemplifying the resurgence of Russian aviation. I encourage you to educate yourself on Russia's aviation history and its current advancements, including the Ilyushin and Antonov aircraft, known for producing some of the world's largest and respected cargo planes, alongside other notable entities like Beriev, Aviakor, Irkutsk Aviation, Sukhoi, Tupolev, Kuznetsov Design, Yakovlev, UAC, and more.
Your lack of knowledge and predisposition to negativity reflect poorly on you, not on the reality of Russia's aerospace achievements. The country continues to build on its legacy as a pioneer in space exploration and aviation, holding numerous records and innovations. Russian rocket engines, known for their unparalleled power, are used globally, including in Western spacecraft. Moreover, Russia's leadership in hypersonic missile technology is undisputed, with capabilities the West has yet to match.
Disparaging the Russian aerospace and aviation industries without acknowledging these facts only highlights ignorance. Instead of harboring resentment, perhaps take a moment to appreciate the advancements and learn something new. And maybe, for now, steer clear of certain other western aerospace products (Boeing MAX for example) to ensure you're around to see how global aerospace dynamics continue to evolve while witnessing the western demise as it unfolds infront of us as we speak.
@@bayouflier6641 Are you an aviation expert?
You forgot to say that its the first airliner to use interactive sidesticks. A lot of Luck to The Ms 21
The only problem is it doesn't exist, it's been 7 years since the first flight, at this rate it will be obsolete by the time it's released, if it ever happens
I'll wait until the plane is actually in active service, then let's see how it goes.
Es un Dornier - Fairchild 728
Great video Sergei.
Always thought the MC21 looks great just like the Airbus 220.
I really hope to see more of this aircraft at Asian airports.
Эти самолёты будут под санкциями.
Nice looking aircraft. Hope MS-21 successful
Very good. With sidesticks, like the zirbuses, the Chinese 919, not the old fashioned yokes like the 737.😢
Yokes are much easier for me, sides ticks aren’t sensitive enough and I love to constantly move something.
Reality: The MC-21 is currently 13 years behind the original schedule for series production. Producer Rostec recently announced that no more civil aircraft (Mc 21, SSJ-100, Tu-214 etc) will be delivered before 2026. So far, it has always turned out that Russian aircraft are unreliable and far too expensive to maintain. Sukhoi SS100 has been in series production since 2010 to 2020 and has a market share of 0.0x% outside of Russia. Russian civil products are not at world market level - in any area!
Like a developing country, Russia lives from the sale of its raw materials. 90% of export money comes from raw material, steal, aluminum etc.
Great looking plane.
But they build good missiles? Iskandar ,Zircon....
You even said Iranian weapons are crap but the Ukranian war has shown the true colours.
Since the truth has come to the surface, the Russians can't even give away their military junk.
A world beater
"Military novelties"....those novelties are doing significant damage.
Already the best passenger plane in the world!
Nice clips. how many was produced so far?
It’s a new plane. How many do you need?
I don't know how many of them were produced, but I recently saw this plane at the airport when I went on vacation.It's a pity I flew on the A320 and not on the MC21
One and half
5 MC-21-300 (with PW engines) used for tests, 3 MC-21-310 (with PD-14 engines) used for tests too. More 18 in production.
There are a few problems. The PD-14 is not ready yet for commercial use. In comparison to the PW engines it is less efficient. The active stick steering system comes from France. The composite material comes from the USA. The PW engines are from the USA. All that is under sanction by now. The MC-21 cannot compete with the A320 and the C919. Therefore, it will not be a product that can be sold outside of Russia. This makes it virtually dead.
NO ONE doubt Russian capablities in aerospace. the problem with Russia has always something to do with market (market population, marketing, etc.)
I am NOT sure if C919 is better than MC-21 technically at the beginning, but I am quite sure that C919 will have much higher chance to be successful commercially
Russia has the market of former USSR, Africa, India, Latin America
“Potemkin Airlines”. Very funny, though most are ignorant of the meaning.
I saw that behemoth Russian transport, musta been 89 maybe 90 at an airshow in Everett, WA. The main landing gear on that thing had more tires than Goodyear. And there was security ropes all the way around to keep people from getting too close. But some yeahoo still went inside the ropes and put a "buy American" bumper sticker on one of the tires 😂.
We have been hearing this for 10 years now
Western sanctions was a major setback for the project.
The aircraft looks very promising, and it’s a beautiful design MC-21
In service the economy seats will be jammed together. Happens everytime
Russian aircraft? Give me a break! I don't trust Russian and Chinese aircrafts! You'll never destroy my trust of Boeing and Airbus. They have been tested and proven reliable.
And fall many times
You sound like some American grandpa... 😅
You are right! Your planes have proven to the whole world that they can fall apart in the air)))
As pessoas insistem em grandes números de passageiros, se fosse assim era só cada companhia aerea comprar um 747 e resolveriam todos os problemas, nao adianta o avião ter 200, 300 , 500 lugares se nao lota nem 50% da aeronave.
Given that many airlines are subject to Government whims, I can't see many European airlines giving the thing house-room. On a similar basis, I can't see many European passengers wanting to fly on it, either.
Only independent from USA countries can buy it
Europe is dying. No one cares about them. World economic growth is happening in countries friendly to Russia, not Europe or the US....❤❤❤❤❤
I don't think many passengers have much interest in the type of aircraft they fly on..
Wow how much did Russia pay for you to create this video?
250 rubles.
Andrei Bolov looks like grandson of Jaws Brilliant engineers
I like the music at the closing scene, what’s the title?
A plane launched in 2007, that still has not one buyer, not even Aeroflot (to my knowledge) is suppoed to be the most revolutionary of all? Even Putin is laughing at this documentary.
Aeroflot group - 50 planes, Ilyushin finance - 50, GTLK/VEB Leasing - 30, SberLeasing - 20, Utair - 10, Irareo - 10. The delivery of the first 6 aircrafts for Aeroflot group (Rossiya Airlines) is planned on the end of 2024 depending on certification of MC-21-310 RUS modification.
There's already a monstrous firm order from famous Ruzzian airline Potemkin Airways. They need exactly this type of airplane!
well cause they can't order anything else. So they go with whats available.
lol!
The MC-21 and China's C-919 are two up and coming commercial aircrafts with scientific innovation new materials and designs. Good looking and well designed with excellent and promising future.
The comac c-919 doesn't offer any innovations compared to airbus or Boeing. Its listed price is not competitive too.
especially since the comac is so heavily relied on western parts, especially its avionics by rockwell collins. All of which Russia does not have access to.
Why have I never heard of this before?
Because of Iron curtain? And this time it was built not by Russians. ;)
Because western countries dose not like we to hear about
The west wants your to believe the sanctions sent russia back to the stone age, all it is doing is harming the west for europe its energy expenses, for america its eroding at the USD being the reserve currency. From our inflation rate, how much money they put into circulation along with playing games is making our currency riskier for any independent nation to trust
"Our answer to Chamberlain"
8:38 so true.. after the "loss" of an225
I think the upgrade version should have wider body and longer length.
An old battered hand-held jigsaw 😂
A successful plane has to be sold in Europe and North America!
That's if it had to compete at its own market. Russia, on the other hand, is a captive market.
It seems like the only company with the expertise to make a plane the same level of A320 and B737Max is Embraer. Also the only company with the necessary worldwide reputation to compete Airbus and Boeing somehow, imo
Not saying the MC21 is bad thou
Так или иначе егобудут поставлять на внутренний рынок, для страны плюс .
Russians can build safe efficient modern airliners, their problem during times of better relations with the west was their support network, they didn’t have the supply chain or the logistics to get replacement part’s delivered in a timely manner. The ssj failed in mexico and Ireland because of this. Like waiting 2 months to get a gasket.
Такой школы авиастроения как в России/СССР пожалуй нет нигде. Ты в курсе что те же Боинг и Аэрбас строились по рекомендациям ЦАГИ?
@@stephenfazekas5054 exactly. They had a big chance with the SSJ and didn‘t meet expectations. Without any sanctions. Also production rates are very low, they will need all for the domestic market.
How will the sanctions effect the manufacturing?
it added delays as components from unfriendly countries had to be replaced, but now it's claimed that this process has been completed
Good luck seeing this anytime soon. It was only 38% domestically produced initially with engines, avionics, flight controls, and more all produced by US and European manufacturers. Those suppliers are gone now. Russia has to rework the plane for domestic parts which is why the launch is pushed out 3 years now. I'd expect more.
You have missed last 3 years. Russia has already reworked the plane for domestic parts, including engines, avionics, flight controls, and more.
Good to see a brand new aircraft, I cannot even remember last time that occurred here in the west. I wish it success and a bright future, lord knows we need some new input and innovation.
A220?
Let's see how well it sells and how the customer services works.
Too good to be true. 24% fuel saving? I ain’t no engineer, that’s impossible to achieve, unless the plane flies empty.
And flies 100mph
“You ain’t no engineer”
composites
EMBRAER 195-E2, BEST OPTION! BEST TECNOLOGY!
Great Europeans, developing great aircraft. The A321XLR is the greatest plane of the decade. Let’s invite Ukrainians and (once the invasion is over) Russians to join.
the A321XLR is the same level as this, not better.
Ukrainians now do not have any qualification in aviation. They have lost soviet basis.
Russia is a great country
lol...sure bot ivan...😂
Was a great country….was……it’s more like an open air Venezuelan prison now.
@@Logicalstu you messed up with Ukraine
Not now.
Engines from Pratt&Whitney/USA, active sidestick from UTAS/France, composite materials from the USA etc. After changing the engines to the Russian PD-14 and replacing the American composite materials by Russian materials the MC-21 is no longer competitive to the A320 series.
This aircraft is not EASA and not FAA Standards certified.
And so what?
@@KVentz do you know any aviation standards or norms?
@@Ljet600 I'm not just know the abbreviations. I even know what do they mean. No Russian planes have or will have EASA or FAA in next decade or even more. And so what?
@@KVentz , The problem is that Russian aircraft have no chance on the international market because they do not meet international standards. Russian standards are much lower than Western standards. The MS21 passenger evacuation test is a case in point. This is not what EASA or FAA requires, it is kindergarten. Would you want to fly such an aircraft? I wouldn't.
@@Ljet600 Russian standards are not lower than Western standards. This is a fake. SSJ-100 and Tu-204 already had EASA and FAA certificates till 2022. And MC-21 could have it but will never have because of Western politics only, not because of lower standards. Yes, none of Russian aircrafts today and in the future have a chance on Western market. Like Russian airlines don't have a chance to fly to Western countries in the next decades. Not a problem. The World is large. It's not only US and EU.
GO RUSSIA ❤❤🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
Great airplane
This aircraft made it's first flight in 2017, thats 7 years ago now. In comparason the a220/C Series made it's first flight in 2013 and entered into service in 2016. With the sanctions against Russia this plane wont enter service in the next 10 years either, if ever.
This video is just propaganda and there is no point writing this comment because it will most likley be removed.
Misliš?
and how long does it take to plane this Airbus 220 etc. ? western brainwashing is not got for you, think about this...
Soooooo…. Let’s talk about this big elephant in the room now……. 😅
In each MC-21 video here on YT I see these comments on its "correct" English spelling. It's useless to appeal to the original Russian letters. Internationally it will still be known as MC (EmSee), due to the fact that the original cyrillic letters exist in latin alphabet. You should accept that. And by the way, it's only good for the brand - it's the same for the domestic and international market.
As if any western company would buy it as long Russia remains Russia.
Do you really believe that all the World is the Western World? What arrogance...
@@KVentz we have no reason to buy russian planes as we are doing much better with the likes of Airbus. Western avionics, western engines. The fact that before the war even russia used western planes and used western avionics says alot.
@@TomNyon It was not because western avionics was better. Tt's because it was cheaper and faster to buy already developed and globally certified avionics instead of making own from the scratch. Now there are no options. OK, not a problem, Russians are making own avionics, western companies lost Russian market forever.
@@KVentz I doubt boeing or airbus care about the Russian market, especially since they have their property. If you think Russia loved its own airplanes more why did aeroflot, rossiya and s7 for example have a a near western only fleet if local was cheaper anyway? Its not that i dont think they can i just think it wont be on par with current western technology.
@@TomNyon
>I doubt boeing or airbus care
Boeing and Airbus lost billions. They sales market, design centers. Of course you didn't know that they had large design centers in Russia and Russian engineers took part in the creation of all modern A and B aircrafts. So they care.
>If you think Russia loved its own airplanes
I did not say that.
>why did aeroflot, rossiya and s7 for example have a a near western only fleet
Because there were no Russian planes. SSJ-100 was the first modern aircraft, but it is a regional one, smaller than the most popular medium-haul planes like A320 and 737. Airlines dedicated to regional flights have SSJ-100: Rossiya, Azimut (they have SSJ-100 only fleet), Yamal, Red Wings and so on.
if its one piece wing... i guess damage cant be fixed?
Of course. Just as you change your tyre. As far as it flies better than the MAX....
Another win for Russia !
Meanwhile, Boeing …..
❤MC21❤
It will be just as successfull as the brilliant Superjet. Oh wait...
Superjet new now is completely localized too
Superjet is not "brilliant", as any other jet, but it is successful.
Mostly built using Western components.
I was at Paris Air Show. Everyone was nice,; Boeing, Airbus, SAAB etc... Brazilians were brilliant. The only completely "what do you want?" were the Russians
I would like to be sure how much of this MC-21 hype video is from the westernized version, and how much is from the Russian one. The cockpit for instance smells like western tech for a mile.
I smell jealousy 😂
@@antwainebarkley9765 Jealousy? The question is the usual Russian hype "we're the best" videos full of falsehoods. If Russia has advanced avionics why does the "brand new and very advanced" iteration of the IL96 has a cockpit with avionics similar to the 60's IL62, that even needs 3 in the cockpit?
And yes that can be seen clearly on the official IL96 video just a few months old.
Can Russia engineers do good things? Yes. But the sad fact is that they're decades behind the western companies in civil aviation.
@@jgnclvgmng5408 IL-96 is the old soviet plane, started from 1988
MS-21 is better than all of civil aviation of the whole west.
232 aircraft is about 100?
this plane is so good that when the US oficials or spies saw it in dubai air show they got into panic and start throwing sanctions against the manufacturer with the objective to stop the project they throw sanctions against the wings manufacturer wich it was in japan, the engine wich was the PW1000G, and many systems all this delay the project but as you can see it will not stop it....
LOL RUssia can't even keep their own fighter jets in the air without cobbling parts from old planes. Apart from the dozen other reasons apart from supply chain and stolen tech, it's a russian plane that's never been sold before. Good luck with that one, you're buying confidence not just a plane and no amount of propaganda can fake that.
And they did it long before 2022. This was not because of the "Ukraine invasion", this was just... because they want it and they are able to.
If russia hates the west soo much, why would they want to use any western parts or technology. I don't get it.
Don't be silly. Even with the P&W engine it was far behind the 737 max. Just remember....everyone who bought the Sukhoi Superjet ended up returning them because they were USELESS at providing spares. It's the same for the Mc21. They reckon they can make 20 a YEAR...when Airbus make that in 10 days and Boeing in 15 days. You are totally DREAMING.
@@nathd1748 They deleted my previous comment when I said the same thing 😂 😂
Good News!
А интересно, способны ли США без помощи других стран построить хоть какой-то самолет сложнее Цессны?
NO HOPE
I wish this plane were successful but with the war in Ukraine how can it not be a dead project?
Why it should be a dead project?
@@KVentz Like Sukhoi Superjet 100.
@@nntflow7058 200+ SSJ-100 was made, most of them are flying in Russia perfectly. There could be even more of them, but they have to many foreign components. So Russia had to replace all of them including engines: construct and certify. First localised SSJ-100 have its first flight in august 2023. Last thing is PD-8 engines, they will be certified this year.
@@KVentz Actually, there are only 141 of them to be exact. in Russia.
But they are using western components, not just the engines. Currently there are 0 all Russian made SS100 flying around in the air anywhere.
@@nntflow7058 There are no all Russian made SS100 flying because all Russian made SS100 project was start in 2022. And first flight already was last year.
In which way is it a revolution?
I’m 64, and since I am born, jets are still a tube bolted to a pair of wings,
Except for “the Concorde “…
Hate to burst yer bubble, but that was what the Concorde was as well. A faster tube, but still a tube. And quite a narrow one, come to that.
@@bomcabedal If you look at concorde, it's not actually a tube shape.
@@nntflow7058 Yes it is. You need to check your vision.
@@nntflow7058 It really is a tube. Looked like one from the inside, too. It's more integrated with its wing than other airplanes, but still... a tube.
@@bomcabedal No, it's an elongated diamond shape kiddo.
Stop yapping if you don't know anything about the aviation industry.
You don't even know what tube looks like apparently.
looks like a sponsored material
That's because it surely is.
So?
sure it would be the most innovative as it’s already 10 years or more that it’s been in design and development. one plane has been actually built. when I see babushkas designing such an innovative plane one thing is clear that it will fall even oftener than super jet
Сейчас их 6 штук летает и 18 производятся
It already in production. And it is absolute modern and competetive plane, as you can see in video.
SuperJet did not have crashes because of quality.
Such horseshit, Russia will NEVER manufacture commercial airliners again.
All Soviet/Russian aircrafts always were obsolete copies of western models and technologies. This "innovative" plane is the first attempt to use the compound instead of aluminum for the body and wings, like Boeing 787. But, surprisingly, Russia cannot buy this material abroad anymore. The technology needs to stolen and factory needs to be built. All of that will happen, undoubtedly.
The quality and endurance of the future output of non-existing factory is a huge question.
Question number two is the absence of good engine. There is nothing even remotely comparable with get engines produced for Boeing and Airbus.
Thus, MS-21 project most likely will be the failure and catastrophe just like the previous SuperJet 100.
Soviet and Russian aircrafts can not be a copy, just because nobody gave a documentation or a piece for disassembling.
What technology in aviation was stolen by Russia? And why USA has researched soviet MIG planes?
Russia already has created engine PD-14, and is working on other engines.
SSJ is not a catastrophe. This was the good jet, the only mistake was the supply of parts.
Now it is reworked and almost 100% domestic SSJ New.
Ridiculous CIA propaganda. U robot!😂
First
Get out of Ukraine
And pay damages
The Boeing concept is designed so that the owner of the aircraft can earn more. MC 21 is made primarily for the passenger, safety and comfort are two key parameters. For example, two large doors in the middle of the plane, they eat up a lot of space (in Boeing these are small hatches with additional seats), yes, this is true, but leaving the plane through them is much more convenient and safer.
To many words, not enough data! For this plane to fly, it needs spare parts at every flight destination. Creating that takes years and can bankrupt the manufacturer. Russians are not known for Supply-Chain excellency. To land in the US, there has to be a certification - remember the Concorde?
too many airlines were burned by the SSJ-100. No spare parts! Looks nice, but it will never fly outside Russia.
I doubt if everything is in order and even if spare parts are made available at every potential destination the likes of the US and EU will issue the required certifications for it's operation in the US and EU.
Remember what happened with the newly built Nord Stream pipeline? For no real reason except for political reasons the Germans (at the urging of the US) refused to certify that NS pipelineand intentionally delayed and dragged their feet for months. It was later damaged by explosives planted & detonated by 'persons unknown' 😏
Мы помним самый новый Боинг, который несколько раз падал вместе со всеми пассажирами и экипажем.
Russians are learning very quickly
Hope they dont sell a single unit!
Sad for you: production plan is filled for years ahead.
@@KVentz For themselves and countries under influence. Where's the big deal?! Also we all have in mind the last big fiasco.
@@LFMC1 Your arrogance don't give you even a chance to realize that the world is not limited to Western countries. But it's not a problem of Russia. Russia will survive without the West.
@@KVentz Arrogance?! Facts my friend, thats what it is! And don't tell bad jokes!
@@LFMC1 Yes, arrogance. It blinds.
They totally stole the Airbus Flight Deck. LOL
that is the funniest things I have ever heard and so stupid.... he he he...
Awesome plane! I genuinely hope it doesn’t crash like the Russian economy. 😆
Russian economy is in great shape. They don't need the American dollar anymore. Us Americans better get a clue soon.
Thank you for good wishes - Russian economy doesn't crashed - on the contrary - so according to you this plane awaits great future 🙂
While Boeing was napping...
Designing an aircraft is the simpler part of the story - manufacturing it is the harder one. Especially when the fascist Russian Federation is cut off of Western supplies of chips, jet engines etc. I'm really sorry for the designers of the MC-21.
In the end, Russia will overcome this challenge
why would we need western jet engines?
These planes are already flying with russian engines and avionics.
And Russia is not fascist, it is anti-fascist.
Unfortunately after sales service of Russian products are lacking. It's holding back interest.
Провал с ssj100 изучили и готовят систему сервисной поддержки очень серьёзно
Copied from US and European blueprints, just as they always have done.
Ничего смешнее не читал.
Its MS-21 not MC-21 😂😅
Russia has his own alphabet 😂 like they have their own geolocalisation system (GLONASS) they don’t use GPS
like they have their own social networks, their own culture, their own traditions, their own vision, their own religion, their own everything
That’s why the collective west are so upset about Russia!
Still a lil problem : Russia also have 6000 nuclear warheads! That’s why the USA haven’t find yet some oil and gas in Russia 🇷🇺
Why "can",
but not "will"....???? 😂😂😂
More than 20 years of "development" and still 6-8 examples were produced... and yet in developing phase, no proper engines available.
MS-21-300 (western engines) and MS-21-310 (russian engines) have different production dates.
MS-21-300 was supposed to be produced since 2022, but now it won't be.
MS-21-310 should be produced since 2024-2025. There is less than a year left before the release of the first MS-21. There are already about 20 airplanes on the production line. The hundredth MS-21 will be released in 2028. The thousandth MS-21 will be released in 2040.
It is not like Russian companies have the same access to financing as companies from rich countries have. They are getting things done on a shoestring funding.
Already producing
All manufacturers are improving wings. This is a second tier option. Sell it to the DPRK.
The orders will be piling in, from Iran and North Korea.
From any really free country
No, south Asia, Africa, Middle East, Latin America. Places where real economic growth is changing people's live allowing them to fly in record numbers. You must watch MS media.
Boeing and Airbus must be so scared 😂😂😂🎉🎉🎉
Boeing, maybe, but not Airbus. That's not saying much- Boeing is terrified of everybody.
@@geoffrey5665Too bad I don’t care am still gonna avoid Airbus and fly Boeing. The 737 Max 8 by Southwest is the most common plane I have been on and am alive so don’t make jokes because if you somehow impossibly make a plane in 2 seconds it will break apart
Is the channel having a laugh?