Inferences: entailments | Example | Logical reasoning | LSAT | Khan Academy
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.พ. 2025
- Watch a demonstration of one way to approach an Inferences question about entailments/implications on the logical reasoning section of the LSAT. Created by Sal Khan. View more lessons or practice this subject at www.khanacadem....
Khan Academy is a nonprofit organization with the mission of providing a free, world-class education for anyone, anywhere. We offer quizzes, questions, instructional videos, and articles on a range of academic subjects, including math, biology, chemistry, physics, history, economics, finance, grammar, preschool learning, and more. We provide teachers with tools and data so they can help their students develop the skills, habits, and mindsets for success in school and beyond. Khan Academy has been translated into dozens of languages, and 15 million people around the globe learn on Khan Academy every month. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, we would love your help!
Donate or volunteer today! Donate here: www.khanacadem...
Volunteer here: www.khanacadem...
Got both correct! Thank you! As a self study student I appreciate videos such as this which explain incorrect and correct answers.
why are there not many practice questions like this available
Well explained. I appreciate it. But still confusing :(
The way I tried to answer it was that we know the conclusion has to have something to do with ethical dilemmas, so the answer has to involve it. So I crossed out the answers that don’t describe an effect or assumption stemming from the ethical dilemmas (A, C). We also know it’s either government or corporations, but we can’t know for sure one may “win” or have more/less dilemmas over the other, so I eliminated the ones that picked government/corps over the other without any evidence or support (B, E). The easiest part is understanding the main idea of the argument and eliminating choices that don’t really talk about it. Their way of doing it is complicated, I found process of elimination was the best way to go!
@@juliasummer9188 I’m an idiot. I thought the ethical dilemma was pointless background info not the conclusion
doesnt OR mean EITHER of them ?? if its government or corporate funding then it should mean EITHER one of them ?
It does say OR, but it also says that "Government is the exclusive source of founding for most genetic research"
I think it is saying that founding can be by the Government OR by the Government AND Corporations, but NOT by a Corporation alone.
I thought that 'genetic research'; and 'advances in genetic research' were one and the same, so I chose B :/