Architecture: The Stuff That's Hard to Change - Dylan Beattie

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 มิ.ย. 2019
  • We’ve all heard of the idea of ‘software architecture’. We’ve read books about domain-driven design and event sourcing, we’ve been to conferences and learned about micro services and REST APIs. Some of us remember working with n-tiers and stored procedures… some of us are still using them. But the role of a systems architect is still one of the most misunderstood things about the software development process. What does the architect actually do? If you’re working with a systems architect, what can you expect from them? And if you are a systems architect, what are your team expecting from you?
    In this talk, Dylan will share his own insights into the idea of architecture as part of a software development process. We’ll explore some popular architectural patterns and processes - and a couple of obscure ones as well - and look at how, and when, you can incorporate those patterns into your own projects. We’ll talk about how the idea of software architecture has changed over time, and share some tips and advice for developers who find themselves working with architecture as part of their role.
    Check out more of our talks in the following links!
    NDC Conferences
    ndcoslo.com
    ndcconferences.com
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 76

  • @chuckyb9469
    @chuckyb9469 4 ปีที่แล้ว +351

    Came here after watching " the art of code".

    • @Kyle-fx4sy
      @Kyle-fx4sy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lol me to

    • @arwahsapi
      @arwahsapi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Been bingewatching him "after the art of code"

    • @reimarpb
      @reimarpb 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      same

    • @GG-uz8us
      @GG-uz8us 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Me too. This guy is amazing.

    • @detaaditya6237
      @detaaditya6237 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Me too

  • @steveyuhas9278
    @steveyuhas9278 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    I'm currently on a binge of all Dylan's NDC talks. Just came from "the web that never was". I love these talks so much.

    • @cjnewbs
      @cjnewbs 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I’ve just binged about 5 now. Amazing speaker!

    • @chriskeller5226
      @chriskeller5226 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think Im up to about 7 in the last 2 days. How does he do it? Every subject is great. @@cjnewbs

  • @striker865
    @striker865 4 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    This was the most real and honest talk I've heard in a while. I understand the architecture perspective better now. Thank you.

    • @TheOceanLoader
      @TheOceanLoader 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dylan Beattie is one of my favourite talkers. He may be a bit too glib for some people, but that guy has definitely improved my consideration and solidified my comprehension of development.

  • @beeble2003
    @beeble2003 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    4:30 "And it's only software and buildings that have architects. There aren't aeroplane architects or racing car architects or plumbing architects."
    Doesn't affect the larger point, but ships are designed by naval architects.

    • @kaiserruhsam
      @kaiserruhsam 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ships are just buildings that are intended to float

    • @IanBLacy
      @IanBLacy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@kaiserruhsamnot just buildings, whole-ass cities

  • @reginaldwalker4407
    @reginaldwalker4407 5 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Excellent talk, you had me smiling and nodding along. If I could I'd buy you drink. I especially found the prohibition against architects writing product code useful. There is a great temptation when you 'see' something new that has to be built and you are too impatient to change the formal design.

  • @funkenjoyer
    @funkenjoyer หลายเดือนก่อน

    Man how good is this guy that I've sat through 45 min talk and I feel cheated because it wasn't 1h long

  • @NevadaWilliford
    @NevadaWilliford 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Great talk. These are the kinds of talks that have legs. I can see myself watching this again next year while having coffee on a Sunday morning.
    It's close to 3 years later and it's interesting considering some of these points after coming through the pandemic. The ideas about teams organizing around tech stack or geography for example.
    Overall I appreciate the down to earth manner in which it was presented. Often architecture talks tend toward big words and abstractions to allow architects feel important and superior to "normal" developers and business people.

  • @hemantsharma5893
    @hemantsharma5893 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    you nailed it. Its to the point but in detail as well. Lots of problem covered about architecture roles and responsibility. I liked the example you provided on reminding the value that developers are delivering.

  • @iwanjones4705
    @iwanjones4705 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A story told with joy and passion. Loved it

  • @coder8515
    @coder8515 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Great content, great speaker. Love your references and quotes. Funny use of south park characters. Last year I've partially designed and developed a cloud deployment tool (for my org internal use). It's different from an enterprise application but principles exposed here can be applied the same.

  • @mellertid
    @mellertid 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "Allow it to emerge". That applies to many areas, I think.
    When (not) to intervene may be more important than how.

  • @cat-.-
    @cat-.- 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Effective immediately you've been promoted to the role of the device driver. You're now responsible for driving the devices!
    -- Boss

  • @catalinstan3423
    @catalinstan3423 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    really good stuff here! This guy is awersome

  • @NickRoman
    @NickRoman ปีที่แล้ว

    26:48 😆 that drawing really cracked me up. I really like the word rectabular.

  • @shelivsbaxters
    @shelivsbaxters 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant !

  • @eddyecko94
    @eddyecko94 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Great stuff. I enjoyed it even as a background noise.

  • @user-rd9xk7ut7p
    @user-rd9xk7ut7p หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where can i find the talk mentioned at 20:31

  • @kps2642
    @kps2642 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really good talk!

  • @danielscott4514
    @danielscott4514 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    There is another kind of architect out there: the naval architect (not to be confused with a navel architect - that discipline is just pure fluff)

  • @ayoubdkhissi
    @ayoubdkhissi ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Talk!

  • @dratir
    @dratir 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "The guy who designed the Brookly Bridge did not build it by himself"
    [citation needed]

  • @tOmzz4video
    @tOmzz4video 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    great talk

  • @kapilpatel9379
    @kapilpatel9379 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting talk :)

  • @codyheiner3636
    @codyheiner3636 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What is "Moss ed" (?) referenced around 21:03?

  • @billiardsforum8338
    @billiardsforum8338 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Officer Barbrady as "Systems Architect" - HILARIOUS

  • @ronnieglendinning
    @ronnieglendinning 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Naval Architect!

  • @MiMi-pb8sq
    @MiMi-pb8sq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Anyone know NDC meaning?. Thank you.

  • @gregf9160
    @gregf9160 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Is F sharp still a thing? I thought they had killed it. Never actually met someone who ever used it or worked in any organisation where it was used, ever.

    • @baopham392
      @baopham392 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was interviewed by a company for an internship position in 2018 which requires me to code in F sharp. Luckily, I did not get it :). I believe that it is good to know many programming languages. But... why F sharp, when we have C/C++, Python, JS :D

    • @protowalker
      @protowalker 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@baopham392 because functional programming is a better choice in a lot of circumstances

    • @salvatoreshiggerino6810
      @salvatoreshiggerino6810 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I asked a really pushy .NET recruiter to find me a job in F#. Never heard from him again.

    • @Qrzychu92
      @Qrzychu92 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is a thing! it even got new version and tooling in .NET 6

    • @yvrelna
      @yvrelna 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      F# is what you get if you're a corporate programmer that wants to develop in a functional programming language, but too chicken to actually develop in a real functional language like Haskell. Or you're just .NET shill.
      #roast

  • @Stopinvadingmyhardware
    @Stopinvadingmyhardware 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Without touching the architecture

  • @H.D.83
    @H.D.83 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No racecar architects? Adrian Newey would like to have a word

    • @lukealadeen7836
      @lukealadeen7836 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He is an engineer, Aeronautics engineer or simply an aerodynamicist

  • @hhhpestock951
    @hhhpestock951 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    there -- are -- Matrix architects..

  • @poodlelord
    @poodlelord 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    touch screens are still a disaster...

    • @realReyLopez
      @realReyLopez 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly. Either lagging, constantly in need of calibration or over-responsive. I hate them, especially in cars. I want my buttons back!

  • @gns2soma977
    @gns2soma977 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The delicate powder objectively fasten because employer simplistically influence failing a fantastic need. resolute, unsightly shrine

  • @diligencehumility6971
    @diligencehumility6971 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    As soon as someone says they believe in the moon landings, I start to hear circus music in the background

  • @carlyoung2512
    @carlyoung2512 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The ratty orange cytogenetically correct because coil inspiringly sip out a strong metal. well-to-do, horrible smell

  • @lextr3110
    @lextr3110 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ndc have gone down the drain..

    • @theorderoforange
      @theorderoforange 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      what makes you say that?

    • @nachiketh3650
      @nachiketh3650 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Huh?

    • @gagaxueguzheng
      @gagaxueguzheng 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I don't know about NDC in the past but I enjoyed this talk and "The Art of Code". I found them entertaining, although they didn't revolutionize my thinking and also didn't teach me many things I didn't already know. To me, the videos served their purpose to entertain me while I'm sitting here with a beer.