You can try with any other points. The end diagram is the same. Note that the inner points are equivalent and outer points are also equivalent. So just check by removing any one of the outer points.
The combination of a bit of luck and looking at what degree points are. Usually, you wanna keep 5 or 6 points with deg=3 or 4. In Peterson, they are all 3 so you choose at random
The initial vertex you remove on the inner star is of degree 3 is it not? I'm a little confused as to why you were able to do that, when you said previously the vertices had to be of degree 2.
It's nice to see someone taking time to discuss Kurtowski. It is usually just
mentioned in passing.
when you first drew the peterson subgraph, how did you know which edges to remove intially?
You can try with any other points. The end diagram is the same. Note that the inner points are equivalent and outer points are also equivalent. So just check by removing any one of the outer points.
You clarified in under eleven minutes what canonical texts have universally obscured.
great video! it's perfect to finish my day!
shut up
Found this video helpful. Thank you
Thank you so much. I was having trouble with this concept really well explained.
How did he decide which vertices to delete from the Petersen to create K3,3?
great vid btw
That's the tricky part.
The combination of a bit of luck and looking at what degree points are. Usually, you wanna keep 5 or 6 points with deg=3 or 4. In Peterson, they are all 3 so you choose at random
You can delete any actually. Then you gotta arrange it in the way to convert it into k5
Brilliant! Thanks for explaining Kuratowski's Theorem.
That was extremely helpful, thank you !
thank you for making the concepts so simple and fun !! 😀
thanks this video is not only and makes this concept lucid ...
awesome videos, i finally understand kuratowski ;) thx man
writing backwards always amazes me great vid
thanks bro I hope you get more views
Very good video thanks ❤
Bombastic Video + Explanation
ek number bhai
Thank you for explaining, Great video.
Good explanation, thank you !
Wow that board is so cool :)
good job.clearly explained.
You are great.
Great explanation ❤
Great video!!!
Great explanation
Thank u so much sir!
very clear explanation. thank you.
What a wonderful lesson!!
Thank you!! This helps me a lot!!
awesome sauce
Sir plz called the planner graph and non planner graph alpha index and gamma index calculation formula of transport network connectivity ??
thank you very much for this video
Amazing video. Thank you :)
are you witting backward or the camera is just inverted
of course he is writing backwards
Nice video. Thank you!!
Good explanation
thanks!!!
Thank you so much !!!!
The initial vertex you remove on the inner star is of degree 3 is it not? I'm a little confused as to why you were able to do that, when you said previously the vertices had to be of degree 2.
Does every non-planar graph contain both forbidden Ks, or is Petersen idiosyncratic?
Perfect
i recommend playing this at 1.5x
Verygood
10:40
why cant we simplify k33 even more?
👍
have my discrete math class exam tomorrow and i know am fucked if i get a question like this
howd it go?
good job.clearly explained.
Great Video!!!