Reynolds Transport Theorem

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ก.ย. 2024
  • Organized by textbook: learncheme.com/
    Reynold's Transport Theorem is described, including why it was developed and how it is used in different situations. Made by faculty at the University of Colorado Boulder, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering.
    Check out the Fluid Mechanics playlist here:
    • Fluid Dynamics

ความคิดเห็น • 71

  • @luthmhor
    @luthmhor 12 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Wow, this is really really well done. Her explanation is perfect, and it isn't confusing at all because she explains it in so few words, no extraneous data is in there to mess us up. If she wasn't reading off a script I am extremely impressed, very eloquent explanation.

  • @budapesteBR2012
    @budapesteBR2012 12 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    perfect...i am brazilian, and your english was so easy to understand that i could see the entire video....tks a lot...make more videos and stay doing this awesome job.

  • @JesusMartinez-zu3xl
    @JesusMartinez-zu3xl ปีที่แล้ว +1

    what took my professor three lectures worth you explained in 8 minutes!! Thank you so much!!

  • @LearnChemE
    @LearnChemE  12 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The continuity equation refers to mass being conserved. In this case we wanted velocity of the fluid and made some assumptions on compressibility of the fluid. The Reynolds transport theorem can also be applied to momentum, velocity, acceleration, etc, pretty much any physical parameters. So it may not boil down to continuity equation every time.

  • @kathryns5324
    @kathryns5324 11 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thank you soo much!!! :D it's extremely easy to follow! I have to use youtube videos, but my teacher doesn't go into this much explanation, but you do!
    Thanks again!

  • @feyzarafiq6082
    @feyzarafiq6082 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    When do we use mass, angelur momentum or momentum?? like everybody gets the RTT but aint nobody explain when to use which of these?

  • @LeserDrac333
    @LeserDrac333 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very good explanation. I fully understand this 8 mins+ video. (I haven't read much about the theorem , I only recognize it during lecture and at that time was sleepy so I wasn't focus). I think I'm going to read the book now. The theorem and the final formula(based on assumption cancellation) were very interesting.

    • @Rajkumar8799.
      @Rajkumar8799. ปีที่แล้ว

      This channel from america tell me

  • @mohammedsakar1655
    @mohammedsakar1655 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It is very helpful thanks, but in the example i think there is a mistake because V1 is higher than V2 when A2 is smaller than A1, how can that?

  • @LearnChemE
    @LearnChemE  11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sorry we missed your comment. n is the normal vector. So you are taking the dot product of the velocity with the normal. If "something" enters perpendicular to the control surface, it is 180 degrees from the normal, and thus it is equal to -1. If its coinciding with the normal, the dot product is with 0 degrees and equal to 1. Anything else will have to take into account the cos or sin of the angle.

  • @yazadjabbarc
    @yazadjabbarc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I believe the example part is great. Can you please explain RTT with more of the complex examples in which the terms of RTT dont become zero and may have complete use of RTT.
    THANK YOU.

  • @dokterdandokter
    @dokterdandokter 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great stuff. Thank you for taking the time to upload these videos. You should have a donate tab.

  • @sepidehmajd593
    @sepidehmajd593 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    great. thanks. but could you tell me why b is equal to 1?

  • @prototypeko
    @prototypeko 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow this lady is just awesome... I learned dimensional analysis from the same woman.. and now i learned Reynolds transport thorem!!

  • @LearnChemE
    @LearnChemE  11 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Appreciate the kind words. This project is funded by NSF, CU Boulder, and Shell. We are continually trying to improve and obtain more funding to continue. Let us know if you have suggestions.

  • @bl4ckm4mb4f0rlif5
    @bl4ckm4mb4f0rlif5 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is a service to humanity

  • @rhinos_hate_fire
    @rhinos_hate_fire 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wow! Joan Cusack really knows her stuff!

  • @Arviss93
    @Arviss93 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the video, explained in a simple, understandable way.

  • @pianoman47
    @pianoman47 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is great. So (in this case at least) it all boils down to the continuity equation. Is that always the case?

  • @nazmulhossaintanim2112
    @nazmulhossaintanim2112 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can anyone tell me, why the associative intensive property b=1?.....03:45 min

    • @Emma-iq6op
      @Emma-iq6op 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Since this example requires conservation of mass (fluid in is the same amount as fluid out), our term B is mass. b is B/m (B is an extensive property, b is an intensive property). b=m/m = 1

    • @tokotadh5743
      @tokotadh5743 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      the extensive property here is the mass
      so if u divide it by mass u will get 1

    • @ginaxs7975
      @ginaxs7975 ปีที่แล้ว

      ^^thanks!

  • @dingzhegan5708
    @dingzhegan5708 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    why the b associated with B is equal to one?

  • @karimkhan1312
    @karimkhan1312 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    your lecture is very good. I am advocate in india-- i wish i had a chance of doing research under your guidance.

  • @KD35USA
    @KD35USA 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That was really helpful. subscribed

  • @JCB16328
    @JCB16328 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish I saw this video before my fluid mechanics' final lol

  • @Heddyna
    @Heddyna 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Perfect explanation!

  • @karthikp2650
    @karthikp2650 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't understand the integration comes with partial derivatives together.

  • @jimmyalmacddissi9426
    @jimmyalmacddissi9426 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    great explanation! thank you so much!!

  • @atb0007
    @atb0007 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    whats the significance of "n" exactly? what is it?

    • @MrAmgadHasan
      @MrAmgadHasan 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Udai Shankar
      It's a unit vector normal to the area pointing out of the system.
      You can replace the term V . n with Vn, which is the the component of the velocity normal to the area.

    • @feyzarafiq6082
      @feyzarafiq6082 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      sign

  • @viggomoe3496
    @viggomoe3496 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    After 7min 10sek in the video, it is said that V3 is flow in, so V3 is positive. Is that correct? is'nt V3 negativ?

    • @LearnChemE
      @LearnChemE  10 ปีที่แล้ว

      For the purpose of control volumes and using the Reynolds transport theorem, the dot product of the velocity with the normal for flow into the control volume will be a negative value. So V3 dot n is negative. V3 itself is in the positive direction, but we dont use the vector in the setup. For momentum balances you would.

    • @sixpooltube
      @sixpooltube 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Remeber that V dot n is (magnitude V)(magnitude n)(cosx). Magnitudes are always positive. The cosx term tells you to use -1 or 1.

    • @basedonprinciple
      @basedonprinciple 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      nv3 (180 degrees apart)

  • @diyaazaghloul756
    @diyaazaghloul756 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing video thank you

  • @niteshkatwal5428
    @niteshkatwal5428 10 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    you should have a better and harder example to prove your point.

    • @LearnChemE
      @LearnChemE  10 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      We can add some more examples to this. Thanks for the suggestion.

  • @hamzamustafa8214
    @hamzamustafa8214 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much. God bless :)

  • @pabloalbarran7572
    @pabloalbarran7572 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thx for the video, I got a questionn; can you further explain of why b=1?

    • @julysburballs
      @julysburballs 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      cos' b = B / m... and in this case the "B" is also the mass...so: mass / mass = 1

    • @nurnovilina
      @nurnovilina 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@julysburballs so, if the B is not mass then b not 1? coz I wonder about that too

  • @tolgat.9352
    @tolgat.9352 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much teacher

  • @shefow
    @shefow 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    really good!

  • @amandadube156
    @amandadube156 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are my hero!

  • @andrewchoi2780
    @andrewchoi2780 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best fucking video. Bless you.

  • @uchejombo555
    @uchejombo555 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you soooo much

  • @pythonanimalia
    @pythonanimalia 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    awesome

  • @DanielStLouis-zx7pj
    @DanielStLouis-zx7pj 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why do we know that little b is equal to 1?

    • @LearnChemE
      @LearnChemE  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good question. The intensive property is the extensive property divided by the mass. In this case, B is the mass, so little b is B/mass or mass/mass or just 1.

  • @NoseBleedrummer
    @NoseBleedrummer 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    CU BOULDER OH HELL YES.

  • @atb0007
    @atb0007 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i would be very grateful if anybody from the pool of 15k viewers would care to reply..? :p my exams coming up real soon

  • @1234SLUR
    @1234SLUR 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    4:32 shout out lil b

  • @10choochoo
    @10choochoo 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hope she knows shes color blind....the System is deff brown not red

  • @yunusemreuysal7504
    @yunusemreuysal7504 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Teyzem benim be

  • @afrinkhatoon4105
    @afrinkhatoon4105 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Achha tha

  • @taylorbateman8339
    @taylorbateman8339 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's SPECIFIC property, not intensive property. But good video!

    • @Babunea
      @Babunea 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      nope

  • @McBobtheruggaman
    @McBobtheruggaman 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ryan Reynolds

  • @rickysmith1313
    @rickysmith1313 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    bless up, super helpful fam

  • @niteshkatwal5428
    @niteshkatwal5428 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    what is the point of using RTT if we could have used the continuity equation easily.8:23 mins of worthless talk

    • @LearnChemE
      @LearnChemE  10 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      RTT is the base theorem that we have used to derive the continuity equation in integral form (using mass and b=1) and derives the conservation of linear momentum (using b= velocity). Its the integral method compared to differential methods like the Euler equations.

    • @niteshkatwal5428
      @niteshkatwal5428 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      i still didn't get ur point.anyways u must be right cause i am still studying my bachelors.
      could u be more specific?

    • @pythonanimalia
      @pythonanimalia 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      continuity is proved by using this theorem...u must have studied various approaches to study fluid mechanics...

    • @andreafani7496
      @andreafani7496 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The continuity equations is obtained by using the RTT like they showed. In particular, you apply the localization lemma on the integral form of N-S equations.