Oooooh, so this is what you meant by "Next video"? I am surprised and excited for what's to come with this! Sounds great and may be the answer that I've been looking for, when it comes to AI. I can't wait to test your Pultec vs Acustica Audio Purple, Nebula4 and UAD's version. Typically, I open up Bertom Eq Analyzer and match the curves and gain of the eq, then I A/B. I will do that and share my results, sometime soon.
It looks like Genome doesn't filter DC. When you have a profile loaded and nothing is playing you get a DC voltage, which will take some headroom. You can see that in SPAN and in the output meters. That might be one of the reasons why there is the perception of more low end.
I don’t know enough about DC but I do know the sound is excellent 👍
6 หลายเดือนก่อน
hello ! Congratualations for your work. I found the sound amazing ! I'm curious like many others with the sample rates of your libs. You said that you are running a 48 kHz session and after reading you in some forums I believe you are recording your IR in 44.1. As it's IR Samples, would we expect bad behaviours if we don't match the sample rates of the IR in our DAW ? In Nebula, the rate conversion just kills the sound. I'm working on 48kHz and I would like to buy some of your products if I'm sure they can translate well into the DAW.
Hi thank you for your comment 👍 this is machine learning not IR. They translate fine at 44, 48. I bet no ears could tell in a blind test. Many customers work at 48 professionally and have no issues, give it a try I’m sure you’ll agree
6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1
@@AnalogXTeam Thank you VERY much ! Let's go then =)
its getting better and better, you can hear how much more detailed genome is, i actually discovered genome a few days ago looking for a way to use the profiles and have gain reduction metering. i almost emailed stu asking him if he thought it was a good alternative 🤣🤣
@@esahm373 it just has a different "image" different depth, the sound has more feel, its more dense. the profiles respond to the low end significantly better. i mostly notice it in a mix the new profiles give an authority and are very rich sounding. it sounds like a more even response from the profiles where the json files seemed a bit mid-centric looking back at them. i believe i heard someone say that the nam files give a larger time sequence for the sampling process
I played with this all a bit, and yeah the sound quality is a huge step up, the profiles behave differently, better, oversampling in genome seems to make them behave differently too, it didn't seem like a subtle thing, almost like the knee on the compressors were different, all in all the sound quality is significantly better, and smoothly clicking between profiles is a huge advantage, only downside is genome is a cpu HOG, I could only run half a dozen instances even with oversampling off
Initial thoughts after testing it is that is indeed a game changer! Best AI stuff I've heard. Sounds super real! I hope everyone can get it working on their system. This is way bigger than just guitar captures. The company should be made aware of that. This could be like the STL Tones thing but with better sound.
Oooooh, so this is what you meant by "Next video"? I am surprised and excited for what's to come with this! Sounds great and may be the answer that I've been looking for, when it comes to AI. I can't wait to test your Pultec vs Acustica Audio Purple, Nebula4 and UAD's version.
Typically, I open up Bertom Eq Analyzer and match the curves and gain of the eq, then I A/B. I will do that and share my results, sometime soon.
Incredible sound! AnalogXAi is just getting better and better :)! Finally I'm getting the sonics I've been waiting for in my tracks!
thank you so much, I'm so glad your enjoying the ride ;-)
It looks like Genome doesn't filter DC. When you have a profile loaded and nothing is playing you get a DC voltage, which will take some headroom. You can see that in SPAN and in the output meters. That might be one of the reasons why there is the perception of more low end.
@twonotestv maybe one for your tech team.
I don’t know enough about DC but I do know the sound is excellent 👍
hello ! Congratualations for your work. I found the sound amazing !
I'm curious like many others with the sample rates of your libs. You said that you are running a 48 kHz session and after reading you in some forums I believe you are recording your IR in 44.1. As it's IR Samples, would we expect bad behaviours if we don't match the sample rates of the IR in our DAW ? In Nebula, the rate conversion just kills the sound.
I'm working on 48kHz and I would like to buy some of your products if I'm sure they can translate well into the DAW.
Hi thank you for your comment 👍 this is machine learning not IR. They translate fine at 44, 48. I bet no ears could tell in a blind test. Many customers work at 48 professionally and have no issues, give it a try I’m sure you’ll agree
@@AnalogXTeam Thank you VERY much ! Let's go then =)
How would one achieve nonlinearity between tracks using the presets for ssl?
its getting better and better, you can hear how much more detailed genome is, i actually discovered genome a few days ago looking for a way to use the profiles and have gain reduction metering. i almost emailed stu asking him if he thought it was a good alternative 🤣🤣
Why would it be "more detailed" if the underlying tech is thr same?
@@esahm373 it just has a different "image" different depth, the sound has more feel, its more dense. the profiles respond to the low end significantly better. i mostly notice it in a mix the new profiles give an authority and are very rich sounding. it sounds like a more even response from the profiles where the json files seemed a bit mid-centric looking back at them. i believe i heard someone say that the nam files give a larger time sequence for the sampling process
Fascinating
insane!
I played with this all a bit, and yeah the sound quality is a huge step up, the profiles behave differently, better, oversampling in genome seems to make them behave differently too, it didn't seem like a subtle thing, almost like the knee on the compressors were different, all in all the sound quality is significantly better, and smoothly clicking between profiles is a huge advantage, only downside is genome is a cpu HOG, I could only run half a dozen instances even with oversampling off
Quality always comes at a cost
I expect they’ll reduce cpu as they develop the code
guess im gonna have to buy myself a new comp! cause these sound great 👍👍@@AnalogXTeam
Just purchased Genome after watching this , but it is crashing my daws. Sadly ;(
just raise a ticket with them bro, im sure its something or nothing, its rock solid here. did you reboot after install?
Initial thoughts after testing it is that is indeed a game changer! Best AI stuff I've heard. Sounds super real! I hope everyone can get it working on their system. This is way bigger than just guitar captures. The company should be made aware of that. This could be like the STL Tones thing but with better sound.
But BYOD is still how I gotta roll on ios!
maybe message them to see if an ios version is on the future roadmap?
I've got to save up for Genome now. It will bring great value to all the old captures, though! What's the chances of CHOW updating his code?
@@coolwill5241 hes not been responsive for a while now, maybe busy on other projects
@@AnalogXTeamfor sure. Well I appreciate your dedication to quality. This AI tech is the future.
Genome sounds really 3d. Any testing on the oversampling yet?
How do we get Genome
head over to www.two-notes.com/en/genome/ any questions fire at @TwoNotestv sign up for their newsletter for 20% off I believe but cant be sure
@TwoNotestv ;-)