Stephen Breyer: Supreme Court Nomination Hearings from PBS NewsHour and EMK Institute

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 33

  • @CrawlingAxle
    @CrawlingAxle 12 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    I don’t agree with some of his philosophy and many of his rulings, but without doubt, this person is worthy of great respect.

  • @VerifiedFiveIron
    @VerifiedFiveIron 13 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Breyer is, for lack of a better word, one of the coolest justices on the SCOTUS.

  • @intervalgaming6196
    @intervalgaming6196 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Whos here after he retired?

  • @pianoman551000
    @pianoman551000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    His voice is very pleasing and resonant. He should record books to audio, especially the literary classics.

  • @teammmx
    @teammmx 11 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I'm happy to see this. Very nice. Justice Breyer is a great man.

    • @paleo704
      @paleo704 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      teammm lol

  • @samarmisra4922
    @samarmisra4922 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    OMG! Back then President Biden was head of Senate huh? Unbelievable how Biden was leading in the questioning and just about now President Biden is in office and Justice Breyer is close to retiring.

  • @akhrormuminov7180
    @akhrormuminov7180 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    He is very respectful. The behavior and the mannerisms are on another level

  • @writersblock26
    @writersblock26 13 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thank you for posting this, EMKInstitute! 😀

  • @ASwagPecan
    @ASwagPecan 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A man of integrity

  • @garymclaughin
    @garymclaughin 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lloyd's was referred as a syndicate back then. Now I think there referred as a Insurance company. Didn't last that long back then. Thank you.

  • @Sarah-vr7yh
    @Sarah-vr7yh ปีที่แล้ว

    Their THOUGHT Life is so Crazy! And not normal. I have recently Listened to what they spend their time thinking about! Bad!

  • @trucquynh3948
    @trucquynh3948 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    like this dude and kagan

  • @DivergentEvolution
    @DivergentEvolution 14 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Nice!

  • @davezick800
    @davezick800 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant!

  • @jannanijland5336
    @jannanijland5336 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    What a very decent and honest man and what a difference with our latest judge: Brett Kavanaugh

    • @MonkeyDLuffy-fc3qb
      @MonkeyDLuffy-fc3qb 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Kavanaugh is a gentleman, that is at least what RBG has said.

    • @tomato-v8x
      @tomato-v8x 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MonkeyDLuffy-fc3qb All justices respect each other. The general public however, is a little different on that.

    • @DissentOrConcur
      @DissentOrConcur 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You do realize politics is the most disgusting system? Zero honor. Zero ethics. Slander is extremely common. Media is politically motivated.

  • @MicroApp619
    @MicroApp619 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice

  • @bradyblake6573
    @bradyblake6573 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wild that @6:28 a Republican is asking about one of the very core arguments of the Trump v. United States case regarding ultimate presidential immunity.....

    • @randomone4832
      @randomone4832 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Too bad the suit came too late.

  • @timmoore2676
    @timmoore2676 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    He has a very Mr. Rogers way of speaking

  • @katerinameramveliotaki2684
    @katerinameramveliotaki2684 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Continue, please! All in jail!

  • @garymclaughin
    @garymclaughin 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes it's bad if Loyd's of London won't insure you, this was a long time ago. Climate change and toxic waste is very important now. Bless you in retirement.

  • @abubakarmuhammeddikko175
    @abubakarmuhammeddikko175 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    P”😅

  • @concernedcivilcitizen8780
    @concernedcivilcitizen8780 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    #1 NOW IS A PERFECT TIME TO TAKE A LOOK AT *TERM LIMITS FOR ALL FEDERAL JUDGES *THE REAL-ISSUE CONCERNING SUPREME COURT JUSTICES = 3/4 OF A CENTURY FOR ONE MIND-SET ON A BENCH IS JUST TOO LONG!!! This is predicated on the answer to the question: Why are POLITICIANS from both parties clamoring so fervently to nominate Justices to all of the Federal Court benches? The answer to that question provides a clear understanding of how Americans have come to view our Federal Judges, and that is, as an arm of each political party, respectively. And the main follow-through on this fact is that Judges these days are more-than-willing to issue partisan rulings these days. This is in fact, realized, in the many rulings that have been issued from the various benches, from the lower Courts, right up through the Applet Courts, and through to the Supreme Court of these Lands. Just look at the resent Florida Court ruling on the "restoration of felon's right's to vote in elections. Consider the referendum-vote of the people of Florida, who voted overwhelming to give those rights back to those felons who have served their time for crimes committed." The Governor of Florida, Ron DeSantis, in his plight to manipulate the voter-ranks in the 2020 election, devised a plan to withhold the restoration of those felon's rights by arbitrarily imposing the requirement that those felons must pay back any fines before being able to vote. Moving through the court system, the claims of those felons, that this was not the People's Will, was dismissed by (Republican favored) Applet Judges, in favor of the voter-suppressing Republican Governor. This sort of ruling is plainly clear that Federal Judges are becoming increasingly partisan with their rulings. This could come back to find the Republican ranks on the other side of such future partisan rulings. So this is the solution: "We need to find a way to take partisanship out of our judicial system, the way it was intended in the first place. We need Term Limits for our Federal Judges, and a reform of the process of which they are appointed to the Benches" I believe, with the modern political climate, it will be impossible to solve, that is, within the process justices are appointed today. I believe the American People would be better served if our Judges were VOTED onto the benches by both branches of the government: House and the Senate. Most importantly, I believe LIFE APPOINTMENTS to the Bench is severely problematic for the Republic. Three quarters of a century could go by, having a partisan Justice sitting on the bench skewing rulings that only make sense to a small number of American Citizens. This has to change if we are to have a better system of government. The course we are on now will only render the US looking more and more like Belarus of today.

    • @DissentOrConcur
      @DissentOrConcur 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Term limits should first be applied in the house and Senate first. Not supreme court.

  • @DissentOrConcur
    @DissentOrConcur 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    BREYER a progressive/ activist.

  • @katerinameramveliotaki2684
    @katerinameramveliotaki2684 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ολοι στην φυλακη μαζι με τον τρελλοΤραμπ!