Sir, I can't thank you enough. I was literally struggling with this theory for a long time, I watched some videos on it in my native language to understand it better but I still had some doubts. But, today I understood it crystal clear I can't explain how happy I am. Thanks again ✨
it's distracting to deal with Y and z axes since they are (fortunately) not moving w/r/t S' -- the material is difficult enough to follow with just one axis of movement -- but thank you for a beautiful series
Space expands, thus from one perspective there is no point in the universe that is "stationary". But the expansion has very little effect on the observations on our immediate "neighborhood" of space, and from that perspective we can indeed consider any point in space as being "stationary" as objects travel through it.
Been watching all the way from 1 of 43 today! Had to leave a comment thanking for all the time you've put into this! :)
Thanks Mr. Biezen. This was quite helpful!
You are welcome!
Thank you Professor for making this so easy to understand. You are the best teacher ever.
You are very welcome
That actually made sense! Thank you, sir
Sir, I can't thank you enough. I was literally struggling with this theory for a long time, I watched some videos on it in my native language to understand it better but I still had some doubts. But, today I understood it crystal clear I can't explain how happy I am. Thanks again ✨
You are most welcome. Glad you found our videos. 🙂
great work! very easy to unnderstand. Thank you!
Excellent explanation
Thank you. Glad you liked it. 🙂
It is a great work you did , god bless you.
Thanks. Great explanation!
Glad it was helpful!
This video helped a lot thanks!
it's distracting to deal with Y and z axes since they are (fortunately) not moving w/r/t S' -- the material is difficult enough to follow with just one axis of movement -- but thank you for a beautiful series
God bless you 😩😩😩
You are a great person
Far from it, but glad to be of help.
thank you
Welcome!
good job papyon reis
Does this imply there is some point in space that can be considered stationary?
Space expands, thus from one perspective there is no point in the universe that is "stationary". But the expansion has very little effect on the observations on our immediate "neighborhood" of space, and from that perspective we can indeed consider any point in space as being "stationary" as objects travel through it.
Do you have any lectures on mathematical logic and proofs. My calculus 1 class in university has it in the syllabus.
Take a look at the calculus 1 videos. (we don't have a lot of proofs).
Thank you sir :)))
Most welcome!
I came looking for copper , I found Gold
thank you sir, you made my life easy.
Nice Video, Thank you
Galilean Transformation is valid for accelerated or non accelerated frame of reference?
These transformation equations assume a constant relative velocity between the two frames.
Sir How we will find the velocity of event in moving reference frame( in this video which is moving with velocity u).
Thanks :))
thats yoda on the right corner!
i've been struggling to "imagine" thi concept, thank you very much now its clear
You are welcome. Glad you found our videos.
gas video
thank you