Sadly EAW I believe is no longer being updated. I think it has a few issues - 1/ The AI on a lot of maps is somewhat weak. 2/ It has a habit of desyncing games with multi-players. The US airborne is a bit limited, but I don't think its really weak against tanks. Its troops get AT, and you have AT guns. I think both the UK and US airborne have certain limitations and that makes them good in larger games where you can use their special abilities while team mates use a fuller doctrine to go head to head. COH1 remains an outstanding PC strategy game, and its mods and addons give an amazing game.
@@KetunpesanPelailut Well, they are cheap, and sadly they do rely on side shots and rear shots - but you also get drop placement. Within the doctrine, I think here you want to be able to butt heads against the normal ones but that wasn't airborne's strength, or purpose. :)
Sadly EAW I believe is no longer being updated. I think it has a few issues -
1/ The AI on a lot of maps is somewhat weak.
2/ It has a habit of desyncing games with multi-players.
The US airborne is a bit limited, but I don't think its really weak against tanks. Its troops get AT, and you have AT guns. I think both the UK and US airborne have certain limitations and that makes them good in larger games where you can use their special abilities while team mates use a fuller doctrine to go head to head.
COH1 remains an outstanding PC strategy game, and its mods and addons give an amazing game.
Yeah but those 57mm AT-guns don't do shit against Expert Ai heavy tanks.. even with the AP-rounds
@@KetunpesanPelailut Well, they are cheap, and sadly they do rely on side shots and rear shots - but you also get drop placement. Within the doctrine, I think here you want to be able to butt heads against the normal ones but that wasn't airborne's strength, or purpose. :)
You're playing wrong with aggressive deck :)