Energy from the Vacuum - 02 - Bedini Radiant Energy - Cut
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ต.ค. 2023
- This is meant as a historic documentary based on videos found within the "Energy from the Vacuum" DVD Series.
Energy from the Vacuum - 02 - Series DVD Cut
This is a cut down version of the 2nd DVD in the dvd series of "Energy from the Vacuum" the original is over 2h long. I have tried to condense the Information contained in the DVD. Much of it is John explaining concepts multiple times and so only one (the most succinct) is kept in.
This video shows the motor generators that John built as tests for his theories. Though this is not all of it and many sections have been taken out and published as separate videos. Primarily 001 002 003 004 005. - บันเทิง
What a great video showing how intelligent John Bedini is regarding the Radiant energy that is produced with in his generators to be used as he describes That shows with out doubt that over unity is achievable.
Thank you! I saw crazy things working on fire control systems. Useing the aether can and has been done. I replicated an Imhotep device for charging batteries. Then took it to an army post, showed and demonstrated it. Peers and officers were astounded. I did not design it, just replicated. This stuff works
Yeah, the Imhotep was one of my first replications too. The noise was a pain, but magnets helped dampen it down. It was/is such an easy design.
@@GuardianEngraving you sir ... are a stud! Thank you for your content!!!!
How is it that people don't understand the input battery is just providing the trigger "signal." The input battery is not charging the output batteries.
That's what you might think, until you build one and play with it. Surprise - the primary battery provides large majority of the electricity, that's charging the secondary battery. It energizes the very coil, that (when the field collapses) charges the secondary. It isn't "just the trigger signal". But there is this apparent additional gain happening, which cannot be explained using just the conventional electrical engineering. So the input battery is very much charging the output battery, but it isn't the only thing charging the output battery.
God, we miss GOOD men.
He said you could get it to switch batteries itself then it would run until the bearings wear out.
I thought of that one, I was wondering why I didn't hear something like that from him but now I just did.
I guess I can ' see ' a lot of these things because I don't have all that technical training in my way.
Excellent !
This is an interesting video Sir. Are you playing taped video from Mr. Bedine when he was alive and well ??? Peace.
Read the video description.
very nice video, is there a video which presents all the inventions of john bedini?
If there is, I sadly do not have access to it.
i to jest super !!!
dziękuję :)
❤
On the double-decker monopole machine when JB was showing us the sulphation being knocked off, how does a 12 V battery measure 23 V? or is it stabilizing towards the 12V level?
Yeah, exactly. When the battery is so sulphated, hitting it hard with those hv spikes causes the battery to reach high voltage. Untill some of the sulfation starts to break down, and the battery starts to take a charge. It then goes ba k down to a normal voltage. In conventional deolfation, you do something similar where u set ur charger to about 24v and set a constant current. As the battery is charged and has all thos Amps rammed through them, the voltage drops. In John's method, you just use voltage and no amperage. Causing no heating damage to the battery.
@@GuardianEngravingso, how does the battery get a charge subsequently if it is only being supplied with voltage to revive it?
@@ekeretteekpo3004 it is not just voltage, but high voltage on the cold side at high rates aka high frequency. Battery's have strange properties that show up when hit with 0Amp DC HV pulses. The HV causes the ions to move by shocking them rather then pushing them with Current (A). The battery needs to be tuned or conditioned to accept this type of charge. At first it will just look like a float/top charge but after many charge cycles the battery is conditioned to accept the high frequency high voltage charge. In some cases a 10ah battery will hold 30ah+ of charge. This is with Lead Acid battery. I do not know much about other chemistry.
@@GuardianEngravingChrist sake! Even you are talking utter utter BS… little snippets of fact with who,e chunks of made up phrases and statement…
People actually believe this shit. He's just making up asinine phrases and making up fake history as if that "proves" anything.
why did he call it radient energy, he could have made it simple by calling it collapsing magnetic field energy.
Most inventors like John use nomenclature popular at the time, and John mostly got his terminology from Tom Bearden. You are correct they are the same thing.
He could've called it flyback, because that's what it is.
I have one to be develop
Is more energy put out than what is put in?
That depends on what energy you are talking about. But the claim is yes.
Of course it does. 3x more energy output than input and if you doubt what I am saying he will send you an answer. OH I just noticed that you have not yet received an answer from him in 2 weeks.
It is as he says "electrostatic" and "radiated" and "collect the charges that normally would be wasted" "Radiant spikes"> He MUST know what he is talking about. and all that stuff he shows in his video must be very impressive to someone who does not know much about electronics.
@@GuardianEngraving Thank you. Please, again, forgive my ignorance. Is energy in/energy out measured in watts?
I am very excited. I ordered the signal generator and battery tester you recommended. They have both arrived from Amazon.
My schedule is full this week, but next week, I hope to set up similar experiments on your channel. I can't wait for the results.
I wish comments were more respectful to your work. Your channel offers unconventional theories. That doesn't make it evil. Most great inventions/discoveries came from free thinkers unafraid to deviate from the status quo. Hang in there. You are doing a great job!
@@shawncalderon4950 Let me know what you are replicating and I can help. Perhaps make the Comment in the relevant video. One thing to clear up, none of the things I am doing are new. Many before me have done these things. I my self am only showing replications of others work. Power is usually measure in watts = volts(V) multiplied(x) by amps(A). Energy is calculated in many ways, usually in Coulomb(C). But pure potential(V) and pure current(A) are their own types of energy. I would suggest you read up on the works from Tesla and Steinmetz along with the original work from Maxwell and Faraday.
@@GuardianEngraving Good information. Thanks for sharing. I will follow your recommendations and let you know of my progress.
I just ordered a book containing all of Tesla’s patents. I can't wait to read it. I will definitely look up books on the other scientists you mention.
Dipping my toe in the water of this hobby began with a desire to build a Tesla coil. Out of a hundred feeble attempts, only one of my tesla coil designs worked. The rest were sentenced to the box of shame:). Though I could have purchased a tesla coil on Amazon, I needed to build one on my own. I have since replicated my design three times, so I feel confident it's not a fluke.
During the learning process, I discovered a love for coiling. Winding Tesla coil secondaries is therapeutic. I suffer from a debilitating immune system disorder that can keep me bed ridden for days. Hand-wrapping Tesla coil secondaries of different sizes and geometric shapes has helped pass the time. To me, it's where art and science meet.
Since your experiments revolve around various coiled wire phenomena and the content on your channel is willing to challenge the status quo, I couldn't help but be interested. Forgive my babbling. Again, thanks for your help.
Its just a motor running off battery
While charging another battery from the back spike of the induction coils.
24volt battery go boom
Indeed under normal circumstances getting a 12v Battery to 24v would be bad.
Didn’t prove the battery was dead to start with, only said it was.
He showed the fill crew.
What he and Tom bearden were doing is exploding the fact that every thing is an open system. Even a simple radio has to tune out the free energy. That is what we call static between the stations.
I agree. Many of the demonstrations he gave show this. Open systems are how nature works. Our small monkey brain can't seem to understand that. So we are forever killing the dipole and the source of energy.
But can you make a open circuit yourself? Do you understand Nikola Tesla open circuit diagrams?
@doubleooh7337 I do believe I do.
@@GuardianEngraving i just want a motor/generator 12v in 240v out mains power on the go
@@GuardianEngraving the problem is what to do with all this old knowledge into something useable or practical today.
i''ve got some gas that you can convert to free energy! 🤣🤣
It sure is apparent you blow a lot of gas.
You can blow it up somebody else arthurmario...
I wonder how much this guy earns from making these YT Videos.
Dont think John ever had a YT channel, so he would have made 0.
see how long it runs after you disconnect the battery! 🤣
?? He shows u what happens, I take it you did not watch the video.
@@GuardianEngravingdon’t need to watch the video… because it WILL stop … look up conservation of energy theorem
Watch the damned video before sh-t talking
@@buffplums
I know you and most of the comment readers won't read this because you're all mentally lazy, so I'm just gonna act all smug, arrogant, spiteful, and just flex on everyone while shoving some education down their throats.
Those of you on the internet who DO read this, congratulations, you've gotten a better attention span than a coked out squirrel.
OK buffplums the know-it-all, do you know what a Joule Thief is?
Do you know what a pulse motor is?
Do you know what Flyback is?
You don't know what conservation of energy is, you're just using the phrase to sound smart.
This is an open thermodynamic system and open electrodynamic system.
First Law of Thermodynamics applies to Isolated *AND* Closed Thermodynamic Systems.
It basically states that in said systems, the energy changes from one form to another.
There are 4 Thermodynamics Laws.
Zeroth, First, Second, and Third.
The Zeroth Law was discovered in the late 1930's after the first 3 were established.
The first law of thermodynamics is a formulation of the law of conservation of energy, adapted for thermodynamic processes. It distinguishes in principle two forms of energy transfer, heat and thermodynamic work for a system of a constant amount of matter. The law also defines the internal energy of a system, an extensive property for taking account of the balance of energies in the system.
The law of conservation of energy states that the total energy of any isolated or closed system, which cannot exchange energy or matter, is constant. Energy can be transformed from one form to another, but can be neither created nor destroyed.
∆,U = Q - W
where ∆,U denotes the change in the internal energy of a closed system (for which heat or work through the system boundary are possible, but the transfer of either matter, potential, or other expressions of energy is not possible), Q denotes the quantity of energy supplied to the system as heat, and W denotes the amount of thermodynamic work done by the system on its surroundings.
You can't have "infinite energy" because you'd have to create something from nothing.
What you CAN do is reuse and get as much power or use out of the same energy as possible, in order to get farther in what you do.
Energy is both an abstract construct and a verb, which is why you can't measure it, but you can measure its expressions when manifested where they will, electrical, kinetic, gravitational negative, nuclear, chemical, thermochemical, heat/thermal, physico-chemical, electrochemical, etc.....
It's the ability to do work... hence why it's a verb and a construct..
Power is different, it's how much you get done with the manifested ability to work.
The equation is literally Energy ÷ Time = Power.
So theoretically, you can have MASSIVE power from specific units of energy, so you can get more work done out of the same energy, but to do that, you have to understand open system, closed system, and isolated system of thermodynamics.
Open System Thermodynamics are how most things in the universe operate, they exchange mass and energy openly and they can take multiple kinds of inputs to make a single to a few outputs.
The Sun does this rather inefficiently all the time.
When you fly a kite, you do the same thing, you're putting in 1 input of work, but you need 9 inputs of wind to carry it to 100% work.
You get a massive coefficient of efficiency on your end when doing this, but you also are making yourself open to external inputs to make that happen.
There are other systems you can look at in this exact way in the real world.
The Sun and kite were the first of many examples of an open thermodynamic system in what you can do with it.
So you could say "free energy" in a sense you get a bit of surplus work out of it, but it's not "free" in the sense you gained something from nothing, that's impossible, you managed to figure out how to game your system you're f-cking with enough to get extra work from the energy you put into it.
You could swap that well-poisoned phrase with "extra work" or something of that matter, or you "went over work conversion unity", even though that's drier than ur mom's twat when I word it that way.
This is an example of open system thermodynamics and what'd be considered conversion over-unity.
Using multiple GENUINE inputs from the universe and your primary input to get the singular output you desired and intended to make work from.
Conversion efficiency can be above 100% in these kinds of situations.
I'm expanding on how to explain a touted "free energeh" device doesn't operate perpetually and doesn't use "free energy" and I actually have to explain as simply as possible how "over-unity" of conversion is possible and the differences between conversion or transformation unity and system unity are 2 entirely different concepts that get conflated all the time.
Because the entire planet has been done a disservice and you're just being another NPC parroting sh-t without knowing what it is or how it works...
The next issue is if you're claiming to perform "over-unity" it needs to be understood what *EXACTLY THE F-CK THAT MEANS*, so is your system over-unity?
OK, tell me how you've gotten past unity in the system's efficiency?
Oh? Yeah, you f-cking can't, that's what I thought!
Is it conversion efficiency of over-unity?
Explain to me how that is, what it's doing to get this, is it capturing a standard loss and repurposing it?
Is it drawing external energy of some sort from the environment?
Is it doing both?
Got proof?
For instance, my easiest example is the over-unity LED, it converts 30 picowatts of alternating current into 69 picowatts worth of light photons, it pulls heat energy from the environment to generate the 69 picowatts worth of light.
That's what has to be demonstrated when talking "muh over-unity".
It's a physics paper called "Thermoelectrically Pumped Light-Emitting Diodes Operating above Unity Efficiency." by Parthiban Santhanam, Dodd Joseph Gray, Jr., and Rajeev J. Ram.
@@reeferbeleafer9912 Nah, I just know what the Hell I talk about before I type, I said I was gonna use bad optics by acting arrogant and smug while explaining science, so..
You bought into it without reading anything I said, thanks for confirming me.
You're just like the other 60% of the general public that's gonna follow what others say.
BS.....they are still at it. This is an old rerun.
I got into this years ago, following these guys. They have not moved the ball down the field and are just spouting new BS.
Give them a PHD.......short for Higher and Deeper.
UTTER BS!!! z the guy is talking absolute bollox and doesn’t demonstrate anything …. If in doubt refer to the conservation of energy theorem. You will not get something for nothing, even if the motor was self sustaining, the moment you try to draw any energy away you will stop the thing. There are losses everywhere … and the fluctuation of the DVM ? Well the fluctuation is typical with small fluctuations in voltage due to whatever the nature of the system it’s measuring … the guy doesn’t even understand his test equipment.
Con of Energy only refers to systems within equilibrium. Asymetric or non equilibrium systems are not subject to it. Eg the sun gives energy for the solar panel. The solar panel is not in equalibrium with the sun. Feynman himself gave a lecture on the inherant gaps in understanding of non equilibrium system. Ur physics knowledge is lacking.
@@GuardianEngraving It's like looking at a wind turbine and ignoring the wind.
How much Energy is required to spin the drive shaft of the KWH meter vs a vacuum cleaner attached to the "output" of the so called meter?
@@GuardianEngraving regardless, you don’t get something for nothing
@@bridgetroll9 exactly
More free energy nonsense.
Not to those who have built them nor basic science. You could build one (properly) and prove them wrong, rather then just troll peoples channels.
@@GuardianEngraving tbh you don't want people coming in going "yes, i built it correctly, it doesn't work, it's all a scam" and then refusing to fix their circuit that they have built wrong. that's bad for the free energy culture.
@@LacklusterOfficial No, I don't think that's the case.
Nobody's come on to claim they've built it correctly and offered it to him and show what they may or may not have done correctly.
I have one to be develop