Salomon v Salomon (Corporate personality)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.พ. 2025
  • One of the foundational corporations law cases, Salomon v Salomon is authority for the separate legal personality of corporations
    Want more detail? There's a ten minute casenote for this case here: • Salomon v Salomon (Com...
    Want even more detail than that? There's a casenote in depth for this case right here: • Casenote in depth: Sal...
    If my videos are helpful to you, you could always buy me a coffee!
    www.buymeacoff...

ความคิดเห็น • 17

  • @roachieaus
    @roachieaus 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Probably a bit late for me now ( unless you have a few spare hours!!) but Company Law in Two hours has to be next! Your videos are incredibly useful for revision purposes. Thank you!!

    • @AnthsLawSchool
      @AnthsLawSchool  4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      My pleasure! I'm sure I will get to Company Law eventually :)

  • @puddinschannel4848
    @puddinschannel4848 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    goshhhh thank youuu, i'm having this in final exam tomorrow and i'm today years old I understand this case. I've been trying this case since last 2 weeks.

  • @thatsmyname481
    @thatsmyname481 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    your cases get me through my law exam thx

  • @rickynengwa7925
    @rickynengwa7925 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well elaborated! Keep it up top👊

  • @tonysaporito71
    @tonysaporito71 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    My favourite case at law school!!

    • @AnthsLawSchool
      @AnthsLawSchool  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Really? Let me guess, you're a tax lawyer now? ;-)

    • @tonysaporito71
      @tonysaporito71 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AnthsLawSchool Tax Law didn't agree me unfortunately lol

  • @Madgistr8
    @Madgistr8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do the highwayman's case. Legality

  • @biyinzikahellenliz3988
    @biyinzikahellenliz3988 ปีที่แล้ว

    Help in simple terms to understand what are debentures and correct me if am wrong according to the explanation it seems the company gave Salomon a debenture but how does Mr
    Broerip come in

  • @aishabegum8538
    @aishabegum8538 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am a bit confused...How can Mr S owe him self money when he owns the business. So technically he owes himself money?

    • @AnthsLawSchool
      @AnthsLawSchool  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's important to remember that the corporation is not the same as Mr S personally :)

  • @scriptureddiscipleship
    @scriptureddiscipleship 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anthony do have any property law video

    • @AnthsLawSchool
      @AnthsLawSchool  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not as yet I'm afraid - it's on the "to do" list though!

  • @jillnunley7237
    @jillnunley7237 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is great! Thank you so much! Would you consider sharing cases pertaining to frustration of purpose and the doctrine of impossibility please ? Namely Krell v Henry 2 please.

    • @AnthsLawSchool
      @AnthsLawSchool  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Jill, I remember Krell v Henry as a frustration case rather than an impossibility case? I will do it for you in the next few days :)

    • @jillnunley7237
      @jillnunley7237 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Anthony Marinac yes Sir. it is a frustration case. it helped me distinguish the two easily: frustration of purpose v impossibility 😊