亂世啟示錄: 空中會見主 (帖前
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ส.ค. 2024
- 亂世啟示錄: 預備主臨 (帖前4:13-18) - 陳崇基牧師
#聖經考古 #城滙網台 #啟示錄 #天啟文學
Welcome to our online worship services!
歡迎你參加城滙社區教會網上崇拜 !
請選擇以下時間, 收看適合你的崇拜 (中文, 兒童, 英文)。
===========================================
講員：陳崇基牧師，2000年畢業於加拿大溫哥華維真神學院 (Regent College) 道學碩士，曾在北美華人和亞裔教會服事超過廿年，後在2011年畢業於美國惠頓學院(Wheaton College)聖經考古學碩士，委身於解經講道，牧養工作，和聖經考古的工作。常在個人聖經考古網誌和視頻上，分享研究的成果和心得。現居美國芝加哥，為城滙社區教會主領牧者。陳牧師現正中西浸會神學院(Midwestern Theological Seminary)攻讀舊約聖經博士學位，研究方向是聖經考古學。
聖經考古網誌：www.marksir.org
聖經考古頻道： / 聖經考古
個人電郵：mark.sir@gmail.com
=====================================================================
城滙網台是美國芝加哥城滙社區教會的事工，目的是製作關於基督教的視頻，使人更認識主。
支持城滙網台事工, 可用以下方法：
任何電子奉獻方法（PayPal, Zelle, Venmo, Facebook 等等)，均可以直接奉獻至電郵：
ar@urbanvoicechurch.com (ar = account receivable)
Paypal:
www.paypal.com...
Zelle
ar@urbanvoicechurch.com
Venmo:
venmo.com/Urba...
======================================
想認識我們城滙社區教會？
主日網上崇拜:
www.urbanvoicec...
Email:
info@urbanvoicechurch.com
網頁：
www.urbanvoicec...
Facebook:
/ urbanvoicechurch
TH-cam:
/ urbanvoice
Instagram:
/ urbanvoicechurch
Spotify:
open.spotify.co...
Anchor: anchor.fm/urban...
Apple: itunes.apple.co...
![死人有福? (啟示錄14:13) - 李思敬博士 [中文字幕]](/img/n.gif)
感謝牧師帶來的信息
陳牧師我是香港人，謝謝你宣廣神的話再次提醒我忍耐和行在主中等待祂來
求主讓我已得36但仍努力按主帶領見證祂
谢谢你们分享😄
Pastor Chan, i have a question in mind after listening your sermon.
Should it be the case that a person can't go to heaven or will not truly receive Jesus's salvation if he or she just accepts the fact Jesus is the Messiah and has died for everyone while without following / practising Jesus's teachings day in and day out (christians who are living by *cheap grace* without attempting to follow Jesus cannot get an eternal life?)
一
一個人信主未必真的能得救？
沒有行為的信心是死的？
因信稱義不是聖經的確實教道？而只是保羅自己的解讀？
Or, we have misinterpreted the meaning of this (by grace)
Thank you!
沒有行為的信心是不能救我們的，你說的是。得救當然是恩典，但是廉價恩典就不是真的恩典。希望有助解答
@UrbanVoice
Sorry, Pastor Chan, I can't get it.
The reason why Jesus needs to die for us is that God knows from the very beginning that we are sinners and can never redeem ourselves by our own "good" selves. We need God's grace in order to get redeemed. The one and the only one condition for a person to get Jesus's salvation, to have an eternal life, is to confess and accept Jesus as his or her personal savior.
However, we still sin. It is by God's grace that we, sinners, can get redeemed.
Do I get this wrong?
I always think good behaviors are what Christians must need to pursue in response to Jesus's sacrifice and grace. Jesus needs us to follow His teachings and practice them in our daily lives for our own good and for witnessing Him so that others can see God through our good behaviors. But our good behaviors can never be a criterion for getting redeemed!
If
Do I get this wrong?
In a school, there are both good students and bad students. But the school can't / won't easily expel those bad students because of their behaviors, not being living up to the school's standards. In the end, except for the most extreme cases, both good and bad students can graduate from that school. Both of them can be granted the same status. Of course, those good students can benefit most from the teachings of the school!
If not, the school needs to set a minimum conduct grade that a student should attain in oder to get qualified to be a student of that school.
Thank you for taking your time to read my reply.
@@PCC9367Exactly, we are always saved by grace. But once saved by grace, faith should and must act in response to grace. Thus faith without work is dead. A dead faith cannot save.
新舊約圣經共31173 節，沒有六万幾節那庅多。
請牧師確定。謝。
Mark Sir，你好！照帖前所講，你的立場是災前被提對嗎？
你好 Chow Tsan Wai. 謝謝你. 被提論/時代論是十九世紀初在英格蘭冒起, 主要由John Nelson Darby牧師提倡, 被提論傳播到美國, 之後時代論的聖經研讀本 Scofield Study Bible使之更受歡迎。華人教會的終末論，亦大受這個說法影響。大部份仍堅持被提論的都屬災前被提。正如我所解釋的，被提說是沒有堅實的經文／原文／聖經背景的支持的。七年末後大災難的說法，也只是在時代論的框架下出現的，特別是時代論對但以理九章七十個七的解說。現在許多有資格的福音派學者（如Craig Keener）都不再這樣解釋。
親愛的Mark sir, 係我未get到你的意思，謝謝你回應和解答，解決我信仰
上的疑惑，令我有動力繼續向前行
@@marksir100 他們只是逃避不去認真解析七十個七，只要認真面對七十個七的描述。至於是否災前被提，的確是不確定。
"必和他們一同被提到雲裡" 這幾個字又是見羅馬皇帝的論述? 作為牧師請謹慎一點，請把當時希羅文化有同樣論述的歷史文獻引用出來，不要盲目相信個別偏頗的學者。
1. 你沒有解釋為何在｢空中｣與主相會？為何信徒要升到｢空中｣？
2. 你太強調｢secret｣ coming了，其實時代論並無強調這點，聖經也沒有這樣說，只是普通人自己加插的。
他有解释为何在空中相遇，你再听多次～
咁即係有沒有空中相遇? 有沒有被提?
"必和他們一同被提到雲裡" 這幾個字又是見羅馬皇帝的論述? 作為牧師請謹慎一點，請把當時希羅文化有同樣論述的歷史文獻引用出來，不要盲目相信個別偏頗的學者。