REALITY of Ravish Kumar, Al Jazeera, Anti-India Propaganda, and Godi Media? | BJP Vs. Congress

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 745

  • @namanshrivastava
    @namanshrivastava  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    www.misfits.bet
    If preparing for UPSC Civil Services, Here are 10 sources, you should watch right away, and save it for the future.
    1. Step by Step Guide on How to Analyze Foreign Policy/Current Affairs: th-cam.com/video/cHv3MdRLyg4/w-d-xo.html
    2. Step by Step Guide on How to Study Economics: th-cam.com/video/yzqE2fMacRM/w-d-xo.html
    3. Step by Step Guide on How to Study Geography: th-cam.com/video/RN23ErVu1Ug/w-d-xo.html
    4. Episode 2 of Economics: th-cam.com/video/AGXa2U3CTaY/w-d-xo.html
    5. Step-by-Step Guide on How to Read Newspapers: th-cam.com/video/XKujsy0oJxk/w-d-xo.html
    6. How to Make Conjectures around History: th-cam.com/video/dkxR5BTZhTo/w-d-xo.html
    7. Connecting the Past to the Present: th-cam.com/video/jYbB1mRwogs/w-d-xo.html
    8. Step By Step Guide on How to Prepare for UPSC: th-cam.com/video/Eg715IMYU-0/w-d-xo.html
    9. Gupta Age, and how to learn History: th-cam.com/video/5ge40TM7udc/w-d-xo.html
    10. Free Resources for UPSC Preparation: th-cam.com/video/nV1CH7pbg8M/w-d-xo.html

    • @redage9759
      @redage9759 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bro tie up with Jyotirmay. You both are totally different, under rated

    • @redage9759
      @redage9759 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@pulsesdigital7453 Hindu rashtra is the retaliation of Muslim Marking india a Sharia nation. #retaliation , hindu rashtra means a nation of everyone except mulla laws.

    • @johnsonjessinth8209
      @johnsonjessinth8209 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      THIS BASIC STRUCTURE WAS BORN OUT OF EMERGENCY.... THOSE JUDGES STOOD UP DARINGLY NO MATTER HOW MUCH THEN GOVERNMENT TRIED.....
      THIS GENERATION ACKNOWLEDGE IT.... MORE THAN ENOUGH
      MANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN YOU ARE SIMPLY SUPERBBBBBB

    • @Malik_are_Kings
      @Malik_are_Kings 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hindu Fascist are discussing how Godi media works.😂😂😂😂

  • @prerajulisation.
    @prerajulisation. 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    I remember hearing this quote somewhere - if you do not read newspaper you are uninformed, if you read newspaper then you are misinformed 💔

    • @sohanmisra5392
      @sohanmisra5392 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Read times of india and the Hindu, you can also read the statesmen

  • @SherlockH0lmes
    @SherlockH0lmes 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +591

    Ravish Kumar Before 2014:- Boycotted by CONGRESS for Questioning Them.
    Ravish Kumar After 2014:- Boycotted by BJP for Questioning Them.

    • @Hibpsc
      @Hibpsc 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +71

      No his just criticized congress once or twice to save face his family members are part of congress plus he always tries to do the same to general caste Hindus which godi media does to Muslims

    • @rohitshipugade8296
      @rohitshipugade8296 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +93

      ​@@Hibpsc😂😂😂😂 it looks you didn't saw his old debates

    • @TanmoyDeb
      @TanmoyDeb 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

      ​@@Hibpsc andhbhakt 😂

    • @Hibpsc
      @Hibpsc 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

      So people have started giving labels when they are not able to present an argument and you guys were supposed to be "unbiased"

    • @GIGADEV690
      @GIGADEV690 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Hibpsc andhbhakt can't argue with fools.

  • @satviksharma78
    @satviksharma78 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +297

    I wonder how people equate being anti BJP to anti national. What they dont understand is that BJP is just one of the many political parties in India. It's not a nation.

    • @VishalSinghBisht77
      @VishalSinghBisht77 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bro I agree with you but when people like Mk Stalin says Hinduism is like aids then people have no choice

    • @sunnynsit12
      @sunnynsit12 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      It's the ideology of Hinduism which attracts most Indian today towards BJP irrespective of its governance success

    • @Redbully-oz3tr
      @Redbully-oz3tr 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      Alot of left lining people don’t understand that there has be a cultural and ideological shift in india and around the globe towards right wing politics and this happened early in india because the of our beloved neighbouring countries.
      This is not about bjp its predominantly about the one sided politics done by congress for many years and the lava formed and exploded.
      This is not about bjp its about ideology.

    • @satviksharma78
      @satviksharma78 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@Redbully-oz3tr Nothing lasts forever....u think targetting someone on the basis of their ideology and calling them anti nationals wont have repurcursions ? Some day or the other it would be catastrophic for the country and this applies to every ideology.

    • @Redbully-oz3tr
      @Redbully-oz3tr 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      @@satviksharma78 bhai what are you even talking about there have been clear wokism in the most left-leaning portals for years that bring worst socialistic policies and minority appeasement which have already hampered our growth as a economy and even clear equalisation of people.
      And its not about targeting about a individual, its more towards wrong doing of the religion and community practices as whole. Which happens in every developing countries, religions backward practices should be challenged like gungat and hijab pratah, child married, having a complete different laws for individual with different religions on marriage and other cultural practises, etc.
      There is a clear discrimination by law on hindus, which you will find many, every much quoted by rightwingers, and we have already given 2 countries based on religion, and both of these countries did same treatment to their minorities. What more catastrophic will they do. We all know about their extreme religious fundamentalist ex- nupur sharma, kanaiya kumar, recently that karnataka incidence, gujarat university one, and the list goes onn. There may be some against the right ideology as well but by population size, you will find more of their cases.
      Like political party, ideologies and religions needs to be challenged to make them evolve, this has happened with right wing politics on global level and left wing ideology has just started being scrutinize.

  • @Sun-tb1rj
    @Sun-tb1rj 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Agree to disagree sir, specially about Mr Ravish! I really don’t think he only criticises! That would be way too moral for him

  • @vaibhavlodhi5441
    @vaibhavlodhi5441 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

    Agree with your point that Ravish kumar is Critical. But he hasn't said anything about Sandeshkhali Incident, about 300cr found at some congress politician residence (Jharkhand).
    If he is really unbiased then he should be critical about non BJP ruled states functioning also.
    He openly says Hindu Sukh mein dooba Bharat. But there are other factors also which matters to voters. Accept it or not an Individual is always biased. Ravish kumar was favouring Caste Censes, Reservation in Bihar at 75%, etc.
    Mentioning about Modi killing democracy but at the same time Mamta Didi is epitome of secularism and democracy for him.
    I would have supported his unbiased reporting if he had covered the Freebies cullture, not only of BJP (this party have distributed hell freebies) but also of Oppisition ruled states. If he have talked about Yadav family and nitish kumar rule (pre alliance with BJP), 300 cr Jharkhand IT raid at congress mla house ). Panchayat elections voilence of TMC bengal. DMK politicians Anti- Sanatan Remark.

    • @shanblues7257
      @shanblues7257 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      The BJP is in power. So, you ask questions to the BJP. At least most of them. And enough questions are asked of the opposition, so please excuse me.

    • @BoomBoom-sc7ek
      @BoomBoom-sc7ek 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What a coincidence he fucked Al Jazeera as biased media and dhruv and ravish has been invited and promote theirs vedio
      It's very clears ravish sir is not that ravish kumar because a people says jao dkh lo Muslim ke Ghar me kya h and when many ladies get raped he silent
      We are not fool and dhruv is proved as German shepherd

    • @futureadhikari99
      @futureadhikari99 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@shanblues7257 so states don't matters. according to you.

    • @shanblues7257
      @shanblues7257 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@futureadhikari99 1/28th of the country.

    • @satyamrao404
      @satyamrao404 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Ravish is doing what is needed in democracy. His first job is to question ruling government. In today's time question bjp is a fear for many mainstream media channel. Be hopeful for what he is doing.

  • @ayushkumar-ms2tk
    @ayushkumar-ms2tk 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Bro, you are the most underrated influence I have ever came across. I deeply appreciate and respect your contribution towards the society. We need a prime minister like you in our country. In today's time, its very difficult to find a good social media personality who is unbiased. Best of luck for your work.

  • @asteyagaur
    @asteyagaur 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +159

    Great video Naman love it, I support Ravish kumar but sometime feels he is also bit biased like not showing coverage on Sandeshkhali incident , Electoral bond issues related to states goverment like TMC , DMK etc. Also you can see the work done by Red Mike team .

    • @samisamisps
      @samisamisps 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      i also agree with you but as you say that ravish ji didnot showing coverage on Sandeshkhali incident , Electoral bond issues of states goverment eg. TMC etc.....bro one person cannot cover all the news of all parts of india its an impossible to do.... ravish ji try to give his best so just sit and watch.........

    • @ammaji7422
      @ammaji7422 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

      And he also tries to villianise hindu in a crime while in other case he try to ommit it

    • @thenationalist3809
      @thenationalist3809 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      He is definitely biased and has a left mindset and not just critic. There is difference between a hater and a critic.

    • @haarees
      @haarees 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think the godi media is already covering it 24x7. Therefore I don’t feel it needs any additional coverage. Also the audience are those who might not want to see things that are already being blown up in mainstream media.

    • @Samconery
      @Samconery 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Not making videos doesn't make someone biased. If he made video on Sandeshkali and then tried to protect TMC, by quoting what similar things BJP did, then it is biased. Which is what most of these "neutral" youtubers do like Open letter and Abhi and Niyu. Dhruv Rathee and Ravish are critical of government. Sham sharma and String are pro government. When people are clear cut like that its easy to trust them more than these other "neutral" guys.

  • @shekabhivlog3998
    @shekabhivlog3998 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +108

    Indian tolerance is due to hindu ideology and polytheistic mindsets not because it is written somewhere

    • @savezshaikh9820
      @savezshaikh9820 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      india is not secular bcoz of hindus ...there r many countries like singapore to brazil to malysia which r democratic....It is modern education , values and investment in democratic institution lead to secular India which is now eroded by BJP.....

    • @savezshaikh9820
      @savezshaikh9820 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      india is not secular bcoz of hindus ...there r many countries like singapore to brazil to malysia which r democratic....It is modern education , values and investment in democratic institution lead to secular India which is now eroded by BJP.....

    • @savezshaikh9820
      @savezshaikh9820 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      india is not secular bcoz of hindus ...there r many countries like singapore to brazil to malysia which r democratic....It is modern education , values and investment in democratic institution lead to secular India which is now eroded by BJP.....

    • @savezshaikh9820
      @savezshaikh9820 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      india is not secular bcoz of hindus ...there r many countries like singapore to brazil to malysia which r democratic....It is modern education , values and investment in democratic institution lead to secular India which is now eroded by BJP.....

    • @ankitchoudhary197
      @ankitchoudhary197 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How could Hindus survive after centuries of Mughal empire in that case? Religious identity and divide were strengthened by the BJP,RSS with the red herrings like gazva-e-hind and love-jihad etc. Regardless, both hindus and muslims would have to rise above this religious divide otherwise nothings going to change

  • @TheSastrikal
    @TheSastrikal 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Constitution is supreme not the Parliament......

    • @satviksharma78
      @satviksharma78 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@International-indic. Constitution is supreme. Why are u seething about it. Government and political parties are a by product of constitution.

    • @nabyendu16
      @nabyendu16 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      No the parliament is supreme coz it represents the people...nothing is greater than the collective will of people

    • @Splicer-lb5xb
      @Splicer-lb5xb 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Constitution is paper, Parliament is an organisation

  • @mayankkumarsingh2603
    @mayankkumarsingh2603 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +84

    Qatar an Islamic state (officially) , funds AL jazeera , who then write article " India is turning into hindu majoritarian state " while quoting Arundhati Roy (who lives in barbieworld with her lover Yasin Malik ).
    Hypocrisy ! Ki bhi Sima hoti Hai.....
    But then again Qatar is one of the country which has good ties with all the terrorist organisation , I read somewhere that even USA takes Qatar help to negotiate with terrorists .

    • @savezshaikh9820
      @savezshaikh9820 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      india is not secular bcoz of hindus ...there r many countries like singapore to brazil to malysia which r democratic....It is modern education , values and investment in democratic institution lead to secular India which is now eroded by BJP.....

  • @uncivilizedengineer
    @uncivilizedengineer 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Appreciate your videos. But many states in India are ruled by different political parties and MR Ravish Kumar is very biased in reporting those states? I don't think so it's critical Journalism.

  • @redesignproduct5223
    @redesignproduct5223 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Sir B.R . Ambekar opposed the ideology of secularism and treated it as a treat to nation.

  • @padmaoruganti9179
    @padmaoruganti9179 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This piece of land has welcomed some and tolerating some , as long as we respect our boundaries , appreciating the value of what we have is the only blessing , Jai Hind Jai Bharat ❤🙏

  • @Amanj_Anand
    @Amanj_Anand 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Sir, secularism was added through 42 Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976 before that India was secular or not in nature as per the Constitution

    • @ajaybhangle3941
      @ajaybhangle3941 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It was specifically added in the year you mentioned. However even if it was not added still it's the basic feature of constitution.

    • @harshit5803
      @harshit5803 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@ajaybhangle3941first understand where the European concept of secularism comes. It can Never be the basic feature of Indian constitution. We are not a Christian country

    • @Kathakathan11
      @Kathakathan11 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ajaybhangle3941so did the congress bring secularism to India?

    • @satviksharma78
      @satviksharma78 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@harshit5803 Stop watching too much of Sai and read constitutional debates. Indian constitution was always implicitly secular. 42nd CAA only made it explicit.

    • @harshit5803
      @harshit5803 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@satviksharma78I don't watch sai regularly.
      Now, coming to your point, Bharat never was and is implicitly secular. We cannot have concept of Church seperation with state. And even if it was, as you say, then it should not be! Bharat was created based on religion for and by Hindus and all those people who are part of Sanatan Dharma like Sikhs, Jains, Buddhist etc. who want to live peacefully with Hindu community. No preference can be given to any other community over Hindus. The first preference will and should always be given to Hindus in case of conflicts. That's why if anyone expects the government of Bharat to not give preference to Hindus over any other religion, then they are a fool! Justice to all , equality to all, benefits to all but the first among the equals will always be followers of Sanatan Dharma. The end!

  • @satyarthranjan7025
    @satyarthranjan7025 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thankyou sir for sharing the knowledge about article 368 and about our constitution.

  • @Narendra_RJ07
    @Narendra_RJ07 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Bjp Politician said :- we need 400 seats to change the constitution😂

    • @namanshrivastava
      @namanshrivastava  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

      It won't affect the basic structure

    • @satviksharma78
      @satviksharma78 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      ​​@@namanshrivastavaSir they seek to amend it using special majority and ratification by half of legistlatures. Do u think it would be a miniscule change ? A sitting MP ex CJI Gogoi has already questioned the basic structure, they mean to break the basic structure and everything that goes along with it 😢

    • @SUMITKUMAR-hl4vl
      @SUMITKUMAR-hl4vl 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@satviksharma78 good joke😂

    • @haarees
      @haarees 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@namanshrivastava Sir, is it only the courts that shall uphold the constitution. Isn’t it the government equally responsible?
      The government has been elected by the people to cover the basics and then lead the country towards growth and security.
      However undoing the work of the previous governments is like climbing down the ladder.

    • @BaatCheetBlogs
      @BaatCheetBlogs 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@namanshrivastava we can not rely just on one Organ of power distribution system...when other two have taken the task to destroy the basic fundamentals of our Constitution.

  • @MMHSardar
    @MMHSardar 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +71

    Is there any mainstream media in India which is UNBIASED ?

    • @haarees
      @haarees 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Most of the news channels are aligned by some or the other government. I believe it has become the duty of the citizen to not lap-up everything shown to us. Critical thinking is the need of the hour.

    • @MMHSardar
      @MMHSardar 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's right. When the media doesn't show real issues or hide it, that means election can't be fair.

    • @sumitdutta7043
      @sumitdutta7043 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Print😂

    • @adityahumane
      @adityahumane 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      None unfortunately

    • @MMHSardar
      @MMHSardar 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When media doesn't show the real issues or hide it, they actually infringe on the right to properly choose their representatives. Then election can't be seen fair, it becomes manipulated. Currently we r in the age of misinformation.

  • @SujeetKumar-wb1ro
    @SujeetKumar-wb1ro หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I dont think Ravish kumar is critical journalist, recent example is how he reported the Bangladesh crisis.

  • @haarees
    @haarees 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    Interesting video, but I feel that comparing India with Saudi Arabia, Pakistani, Qatar etc, which are autocratic is incorrect example. We should look at democratic nations which are equivalent or better than us.

    • @gayatri3482
      @gayatri3482 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      One party in every state and central is not good in democracy. At least in india. We have different languages, religious faith and lots of scheduled tribes The culture is also unique. A local representative in Central is imp. Nowadays people are voting on the name of Modi and believe that modi is God. Recent speech by kangana.

    • @statusworld2788
      @statusworld2788 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No one is comparing with those countries.

    • @nidheeshkumar6760
      @nidheeshkumar6760 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@nuranichandra2177😂define autocratic democracy first

    • @Sunshine234t
      @Sunshine234t 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@nuranichandra2177just like good and bad are two OPPOSITE words democracy and autocracy are also two OPPOSITE words 😂

    • @Sunshine234t
      @Sunshine234t 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He is not comparing India with Qatar, he is just showing mirror to Qatar.

  • @sushil386
    @sushil386 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The present authorities in world already successfully divided people to each others side.

  • @KACHHANI
    @KACHHANI 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    No matter where it comes from
    If it is truth

  • @rawdinagor5425
    @rawdinagor5425 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    hii , today iam 17 and strong belive in your opinion on state of semocracy and india is due to our poloticians * whom we choose on behaf of party not by himself

  • @sandeeprevoju8169
    @sandeeprevoju8169 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    This video is all about al jazeera. Misleading title and thumbnails. Disappointed

    • @Babacsgo
      @Babacsgo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      TH-camrs

  • @pearstt
    @pearstt 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Correct analysis . But without amending the constitution people in power can bend - jugad - ways - the existing laws like what is happening now. There is no limit how much they can bend

  • @TheSastrikal
    @TheSastrikal 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Critical journalism vs critical journalism......

  • @utkarshdubey6882
    @utkarshdubey6882 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    the best journalism is whom 1 vs 100 i dont like to be part of crowd supporting a particular theme rather the one who is caliber to criticize the crowd.

  • @MayankKumar-k7n
    @MayankKumar-k7n 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +110

    I have no problem when Ravish criticise BJP , Amit shah and his Spoiled BCCI secretary 😂😂.
    But I don't understand how it is fair to say that he is critical analyst.
    He don't make videos on
    Sandeshkhali
    Badayunb two minor brothers were killed
    Now he is supporting Manifesto of INC😂😂

    • @Samconery
      @Samconery 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      Not making videos doesn't make someone biased. If he made video on Sandeshkali and then tried to protect TMC, by quoting what similar things BJP did, then it is biased. Which is what most of these "neutral" youtubers do like Open letter and Abhi and Niyu. Dhruv Rathee and Ravish are critical of government. Sham sharma and String are pro government. When people are clear cut like that its easy to trust them more than these other "neutral" guys.

    • @mayankmanas144
      @mayankmanas144 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Samconery such a great response 👍❤️

    • @TanmoyDeb
      @TanmoyDeb 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Sandeshkhali is a fake issue😂,, what are the proofs??? Has the court punished shahjahan? What about BHU rape case, Naked parade of women in Manipur, Wrestlers protest??? How can u people forget these things and ask questions about sandeshkhali?? Shame on u

    • @MayankKumar-k7n
      @MayankKumar-k7n 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Samconery आप ने जो लिखा है वो मैं समझ गया हु , हिंदी में लिख सकते है आप।
      भाई तुमने तय कर लिया है की ध्रुव और रवीश कुमार क्रिटिकल एनालिस्ट है , मैं कुछ भी कहूंगा तुम उसका काउंटर ले आओगे उनको डिफेंड करने के लिए।
      दिल्ली और पंजाब में है आम आदमी पार्टी की सरकार, तुमने रवीश कुमार की कोई वीडियो देखी है जिसमे वो AAP government की कमियों को दिखा रहा हो😁😁।
      पंजाब पुलिस, पंजाब से जम्मू कश्मीर जाति है एक यूट्यूबर को पकड़ने के लिए।
      उस youtuber ने कोई क्राइम किया होता तो मान भी लेता की पंजाब पुलिस ने सही किया, पर उस Utuber ने कॉलेज के बाहर नशे और वैश्या के धंधे का भांडा फोड़ किया था।
      रवीश और ध्रुव ने तुरंत वीडियो अपलोड किया जब kejriwal जेल गया तो।
      जिसकी party का नाम आम आदमी पार्टी है
      उसकी पुलिस आम निर्दोष लोगो को पकड़ रही हैं उसपे Dhruv Rathee aur Ravish ji jo so called critical Analyst हैं वो कुछ नही बोले।
      संजय सिंह ( AAP Party Candidate) जेल से बाहर आया Ravish ji का video आ गया
      = Sanjay Singh जेल से बाहर Kejriwal कब😁😁😁।
      भाई ये दोनो को मैं दलाल कहता हू।
      Gaza पे इनलोगो ने video बना बना कर बोर कर दिया है😀😀। संदेश खाली पर क्यों नही वीडियो बना रहे। और जवाब ले लो , shahjahan पुलिस कस्टडी में, बेशर्म की तरह कह देते हों की क्राइम कहा proof हुआ है, जब खुद के लोगो के साथ होगा तब पता चलेगा।
      वो पूरे एक बस्ती की महिलाए झूट बोल रही है, वो लोग को मजा आता है कहने मे की मेरा रेप हुआ है , शोषण हुआ, ना।
      Jharkhand मे जो Brazillian महिला के साथ रेप हुआ उसपे तो Ravish kumar और Dhruv Rathee ko video बना देना
      chahiye था।
      Manipur, IIT BHU , Sandeshkhali, Jharkhand, Jaha bhi rape hota hai ye bahut galat hai. Sarey desh m law and order fail hai chahe Congress ho AAP ho ya BJP.
      I will never support any Crime, Abuse, or sexual Harrasment against women , it's against my ideology.
      I don't talk on these topics by picking any side.

    • @MayankKumar-k7n
      @MayankKumar-k7n 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      @@TanmoyDeb beta jab khud k logo k sath hoga na tab pata chalega , tab ye emoji lagana aur hasna samjhe. Garib Mahilao ko to maza ata hai na khud ke rape ka rumor ya propaganda failane m

  • @ayushsaroj16
    @ayushsaroj16 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Ravish's Philosophy is simple and clear that He will ask questions no matter who is in the power, be it Congress or BJP, earlier bjp themselves used to call to get interviewed by Ravish. Tagging him as Anti indian is the most foolish thing ever.

  • @balajisankarkonakalla3369
    @balajisankarkonakalla3369 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's soo sad that secular country want religious money 💰

  • @TheSastrikal
    @TheSastrikal 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Your vocab is 🥳🥳👍

  • @MandeepSingh-bv2zw
    @MandeepSingh-bv2zw หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just because a news website/channel is funded by an entity, the facts that they put forth should not automatically be dismissed as false.

  • @aakashsingh409
    @aakashsingh409 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Why adani just adani but ambani ji?

    • @Theabyss456
      @Theabyss456 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Congress doesn't speak of Ambani because Ambani has Friendship with Congress as well

    • @kochhazard7979
      @kochhazard7979 หลายเดือนก่อน

      May be he respects ambani more.

    • @iama.k1080
      @iama.k1080 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just a intictictive, it's not that deep

    • @sadiqsd7800
      @sadiqsd7800 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Adani tera baap hai kya

  • @Miscellaneous-tuber
    @Miscellaneous-tuber 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awsm sir....what a clearity of thoughts...damn good...point to point ....precise....👍👌🙂 ....indeed the way you articulate things makes things(topics) to easy to understand which are actually not.

  • @shubhamsaini4770
    @shubhamsaini4770 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    Al Jazeera also invited ravish Kumar and dhruv rathi
    You didn't tell their names
    You are biased

    • @rohitnegi4651
      @rohitnegi4651 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      can you share links for the same?

    • @SeeMeTalk
      @SeeMeTalk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      share the link or retract the comment

    • @shubhamsaini4770
      @shubhamsaini4770 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      th-cam.com/video/d1B5V0KUFQQ/w-d-xo.htmlsi=dRVyhPmOSzkt7WpI​@@rohitnegi4651

    • @shubhamsaini4770
      @shubhamsaini4770 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@rohitnegi4651th-cam.com/video/d1B5V0KUFQQ/w-d-xo.htmlsi=dRVyhPmOSzkt7WpI

    • @archertroop5784
      @archertroop5784 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      so did Godi media invite ex muslims acutally hindus in disguise
      though it failed
      every news channel is centralized and has a master for its agendas

  • @zubinbilllimoria2060
    @zubinbilllimoria2060 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    It goes beyond "biased journalism"... it is sometimes propoganda under the name of journalism.
    Makes it difficult for me to fly Quatar airways, even if the best airline in world today.

  • @nazmakhan5148
    @nazmakhan5148 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Naman, you are fantastic. I am a FAN. This video of yours shows pure patriotism.. Love for India. But put your hand on your heart and now tell me isn't there a BIAS against Muslims in India. We don't need Al Jazeera to tell us. We Muslims have accepted that it is a fascist hindu rashtra! Don't believe us then just go through the comments people are posting. But at the end of the day, I love your work! Keep it up!

    • @why99995
      @why99995 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Where? Can you elaborate?

    • @nazmakhan5148
      @nazmakhan5148 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@why99995 @ItShivm, @ANO-123 checkout

  • @Vote4Congress2029
    @Vote4Congress2029 หลายเดือนก่อน

    3:15 He is one of the heroes of Democracy like you sir❤

  • @khadimsuhail857
    @khadimsuhail857 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

    Sir sometimes talk about our godi media😂😂bootlickers of modi😂

    • @ImranShaikh-xj4yy
      @ImranShaikh-xj4yy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@Ekamsatya-3 Media works and influences the people. People, if bombarded by certain information in one way changes people's perspectives. That's how media works.

    • @mb_1990
      @mb_1990 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      And the khan market gang as well

    • @ImranShaikh-xj4yy
      @ImranShaikh-xj4yy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Ekamsatya-3 You should start with its meaning

  • @satyamshukla193
    @satyamshukla193 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Heads of to you sir, the way you are making our youngsters rational is a very good step to protect our Bharat Mata from cheap politics, casteism, WhatsApp university thoughts etc...!! 🙏

  • @Profound1523
    @Profound1523 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Many of us want know about study leave of ias officers so bring someone who took study leaves

  • @AnuragKumar-te6pj
    @AnuragKumar-te6pj 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why "secular" was not the part of preamble at the beginning? It was added in 42 amendment.

  • @shivamtiwari5434
    @shivamtiwari5434 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Naman bhai Hindi me video banao , logon ko jyada better samjh aayega or reach bhi badhegi apki .

  • @sudhirchandra9790
    @sudhirchandra9790 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Message is more important than messenger

  • @devendra...1208
    @devendra...1208 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Quatar is also some whome you see on virat Kohli (RCB) IPL TSHIRT 😂

  • @nicksdudep
    @nicksdudep 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I wonder your changing tone has anything to do with the pressure

  • @pankajbachhao
    @pankajbachhao 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Happy to know you atleast got your views correct about RavishKumar 😊

    • @Sun-tb1rj
      @Sun-tb1rj 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      And you follow Dhruv rathee, Wire! No wonder you would be happy!🥱

    • @pankajbachhao
      @pankajbachhao 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Sun-tb1rj I have intellectual to understand a situation........ unlike you I am not a mindless follower......

    • @Sun-tb1rj
      @Sun-tb1rj 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@pankajbachhaono I don’t believe you sir, literally, plus the person who is claiming that you have intellect is YOU ONLY😂😂😂 PLUS SIR, It’s Intellect not intellectual! Talk about me being mindless😂😂 can’t even write properly

    • @pankajbachhao
      @pankajbachhao 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Sun-tb1rj you really are free loader who is pakka unemployed.....
      Bothering people with grammatical mistakes like an immatured child in school

  • @AmitBasuri
    @AmitBasuri 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great discussion in the video, but I think it's essential to peel back the layers on some of the arguments made regarding Al Jazeera's coverage:
    1. Circular Reasoning: The argument that Al Jazeera is biased because it's funded by Qatar, which supports Pakistan, and then using this presumed bias to validate Qatar's intentions seems to circle back on itself. For instance, saying "Al Jazeera reports this way because it's funded by Qatar" and then asserting "This proves Qatar's intentions" without independent evidence of bias is a classic case of circular reasoning. It’s like saying the only proof of the rain is the wet streets, without considering other sources of water.
    2. Circumstantial: Critiquing Al Jazeera's coverage based primarily on its funding source skirts around the actual content. If we say, "Al Jazeera’s reports can’t be trusted because Qatar funds them," we're not engaging with the reports' accuracy or journalistic quality but discrediting them based on who pays the bills. It’s akin to dismissing a scientist’s findings on climate change simply because they received a grant from an environmental agency, rather than critiquing the research's methodology or conclusions.

  • @Hibpsc
    @Hibpsc 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Sir with due respect ravish kumar is not a critical journalist I can you many videos of him criticizing bjp and playing a card of favoritism with congress during upa era he just critisized one or twice to save face

    • @mayankmanas144
      @mayankmanas144 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Nope he was literally invited to amit shah's house 😂! But now not any bjp leader even want to get interviewed by him ! And he was one of those reporters who was blacklisted during upa govt !

  • @swapnilshubham
    @swapnilshubham 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I agree we should not trust Al Jazeera. But when these pop hindu songs are played in locality on Hanuman Jayanti and Ram Navami and having words like "Naam mitado Babur ka" I am afraid where my country is heading

  • @tarak779
    @tarak779 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fact is - Western idea of secularism should not fully applicable for ndia. Indian culture, tradition is way different from others.

  • @parijatshrivastava
    @parijatshrivastava 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    On the topic of biased journalism, do shine light on the state of domestic media as well

  • @fitnesshunks7742
    @fitnesshunks7742 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Finally someone come up with true knowledge above of left and right wings propaganda

  • @tejaswar143
    @tejaswar143 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think people should start raising questions, even to your favorite political party. You can vote for BJP, Congress or any other party but we should be able to question them.

  • @bubaikundu7986
    @bubaikundu7986 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    One of my relative stays in Qatar for professional purpose and he told me that some of the men searched every persons door to door whether they are hindu or not .. worshipped or not during ramadan... And believe me or not he told me that the situation was like ...." Fuck identity... I have to hide those idols sculpture"... So basically this is the scenario of a state ... Hindus cant drink water during roza time in streets even they are thirsty whether its a kid or adult, And then this Al Jazeera or whatever news media, they are covering this U.P goons house demolition news and tried to brain washing some of their audiences mind by some of our secularism ke 14 reporter like barkha dutt and all .

  • @pingping6967
    @pingping6967 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    What about DHRUV Rathi?
    I feel like he also does selective journalism.

    • @nabyendu16
      @nabyendu16 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      He was in AAP IT Cell

    • @hazrat_mansur
      @hazrat_mansur 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      He's backed by AAP

    • @samaygurjar5764
      @samaygurjar5764 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      He is destroying the young generation of india through his biasness on tha shake of criticise the modi government...

    • @pingping6967
      @pingping6967 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@samaygurjar5764 yup

    • @GiteshRishi
      @GiteshRishi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@samaygurjar5764English sudhar le,aur destroy kahi nhi kr rha,mnta hu criticize krta hai sirf bjp ko pr galat kitni bar bola hai,kabhi logical counter toh dia Karo uske arguments ka tb toh jakr koi sunega tumhari vrna bhaukte rhna kutte ki tarah

  • @rscsingh7848
    @rscsingh7848 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I thoroughly disagree with you Naman on the point of Ravish.
    He is a BIASED journalist and I have been watching him for about 2 decades. He is not critical. He is biased.
    I did not mind when you said NDTV is funded by Adani, but you carefully forgot to state that it was earlier promoted by the Karats of the CPI party, during the 90s and until being bought off by Adani.
    This is your bias.

  • @mdfarhaanahmad7139
    @mdfarhaanahmad7139 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Whoever is saying Hindu ideology is behind secularism is wrong to the core. Who cherry-pick their hindu scripture based on the wishes of their master i.e colonialist master. Secularism is purported by the colonial master and enshrined in the constitution as this is the popular world order, not because of hinduism.

    • @utsavyadav8688
      @utsavyadav8688 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Jinnah also made Pakistan secular , but it is removed by ziaul haq bcoz he knows his population support this decision , yes I strongly believe india is secular bcoz of majority are hindhu

  • @aditimandal7481
    @aditimandal7481 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Critical Ravish kumar:- monu monu monu monu monu monu monu monu

    • @GiteshRishi
      @GiteshRishi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sarcasm smjha kr,majak ki ard me tune journalism ko hi majak smjh lia,tabhi khta hu bhakto, Dont rely on main stream media

  • @dr.shashankbaghel
    @dr.shashankbaghel 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thank you sir

  • @ishwarchincholkar
    @ishwarchincholkar 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Could you create a video discussing Pooja Khedkar's IAS case? It would be great if you could explain how UPSC ensures its integrity and fairness in its processes.
    how UPSC is not corrupt organization ?

  • @himanshusingh-st7xi
    @himanshusingh-st7xi 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The @namanshrivastava bro ,ur thumbnail is so clickbait that some, left n right (extremes) r both unhappy n surprise, it's like glitch in matrix 👍🤣 keep it up

  • @TheDecodedMatter
    @TheDecodedMatter 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    India may be not a Hindurashtra legally, it may not have Hindu structures, but the enforcers are humans. And we have seen that many officers, IAS, IPS even, have shown their intellectual support towards Hindutva. Cases of isolation of Muslims by authority figures are on rise.

  • @988f
    @988f 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Journalism traditionally involves praising government achievements and criticizing its failures. However, it has become polarized.
    One side focuses solely on criticism, neglecting positive government actions and beneficial policies (e.g., NDTV, Dhruv Rathee).
    The other side exclusively praises the ruling party, creating an uncritical, glorified image (e.g., Zee TV, Sudarshan News, Republic, OpIndia).

  • @apoorvchauhan9852
    @apoorvchauhan9852 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well of late we have heard concerns over shrinking democratic space, erosion of secular character and violations of rule of law in India. Your contention is that constitutionally India can't become a Hindu state. However, we must acknowledge the fact that there is a difference between Constitution and Constitutionalism. Constitution may exist on paper but reality is different on the ground. I must also say this that forces of secularism are equally responsible for rise of communalism in India.

  • @lecorbusier2253
    @lecorbusier2253 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you suggest few unbiased news outlets

  • @Unknownbass18
    @Unknownbass18 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Naman bhai at the end Ican conclude that most media picks up their side kyunki dukan band ho jayegi.
    And Naman bhai, I don't think Ravish is a critical journalist.

  • @vivekpuri-08
    @vivekpuri-08 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When muslims from gulf run boycott India campaign in response to the correct verse quoted by some lady from islamic book I seriously doubt their intentions

  • @bababillenial7861
    @bababillenial7861 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    why have you written @sonunigam at the bottom of your description?

  • @arjunbasumatary4758
    @arjunbasumatary4758 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If someone will ask me ,I am from Hindu Republic of India🇮🇳

  • @somekartikeypant6321
    @somekartikeypant6321 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good evening Naman.
    I request if you could bring out a video on the latest assault and crime committed by the Odisha police on an Army officer and his fiance and how they are fighting for justice. These cases have become rampant by these uniformed police goons against the Armed Forces. You being from Gwalior must have heard about the latest illegal detention of an Army Major by the Gwalior police. Not to mention the recent physical abuse of an Army jawan by Jaipur police while on leave who is posted at LOC where the honorable cabinet minister of Rajasthan had to intervene which I feel he only did as he has a soft corner for the Forces , being an ex- fauji himself.
    If the people who serve and protect the nation do not get justice then there is no use to serve this nation being part of the most prestigious organisation. A humble request my friend.
    Thank you.🫡

  • @ankitchand7285
    @ankitchand7285 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

  • @Logicalmind911
    @Logicalmind911 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ravish Kumar did not expose or report against Congress or Left scams.
    I was starting to think that Naman was not biased or is not usually wrong.
    But then again. 😅

  • @r_rahul_dash
    @r_rahul_dash 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Honestly intellectuals try hard to define who is unbiased these days but only sound ironical at the end .
    Ravish, Rathee are unbiased by using sources like Aljazerra for Facts .😅

  • @s.mfardeen3365
    @s.mfardeen3365 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So sir tell me.which indian main stream media is doing critical journalism ?

  • @krishnasai7891
    @krishnasai7891 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What Indian lawmakers did mistake is they defined secularism but they did not mentioned limitations of secularism which is taken advantage. Secularism becomes auto-immune when appeasement is allowed. So governments that ran for 60 years have done appeasement to one group of ideology for their vote bank, this led to another group in majority to defend themselves ideologically. Politicians in democracy are supposed to ask votes based on over-all welfare, security and progress, not on basis of community, sects. Flagship political discourses are wrong.

  • @celinafernandesgracias9658
    @celinafernandesgracias9658 หลายเดือนก่อน

    FOR ME I WOULD SAY RAVISH KUMAR SIR IS ONE OF THE BEST JOURNALIST .. THERE IS A SAYING THAT SAYS THAT ..IF JOURNALISM IS GOOD ,IT IS CONTROVERSIAL (CRITICAL) BY ITS NATURE ...SECONDLY INDIA IS SECULAR ,🤣🤣AFTER SEEING SO MANY ISSUES HAPPENING IN FRONT OF OUR EYES HOW CAN ONE THINK SIR THAT INDIA IS A SECULAR COUNTRY ...TAKE THE EXAMPLE OF MANIPUR , UP ,RAJASTHAN ,CHATTISGARH

  • @Box0-0-0
    @Box0-0-0 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    Its funny how you wrote Godi Media in the title but didnt even utter a single word about them , whereas calling out Ravish on biased reporting and misinterpreting data , cheery picking ,which you would have known better if you watched and fact checked him .

    • @barneystinson8789
      @barneystinson8789 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      He supported Ravish. Please take notes, use dictionary - if you find it difficult to comprehend words and sentences. It will help.

    • @SherlockH0lmes
      @SherlockH0lmes 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You got the video wrong bro, watch it again

    • @Box0-0-0
      @Box0-0-0 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@barneystinson8789 Perhaps you should rewatch the video ,He did say critical journalism is vital part of society followed by "but biased reporting is not 'misinterpreting' , 'cherrypicking' , 'fake stories' . mixing positive/negative feedback. Get a psychology book, play of words isn't hard to notice here.

    • @Lol06987
      @Lol06987 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Box0-0-0he has criticised bjp already in his channel. U can check

    • @Sahil-lover-gy6dj
      @Sahil-lover-gy6dj 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Box0-0-0You are also a blind supporter that is why you came to watch video because you saw 'godi' word 😂 , Naman sir is our teacher we know him very well , he criticises each and every party but you andhnamazi just want to see what you want 😅.

  • @shahbaazkhan5174
    @shahbaazkhan5174 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ek tum hi bache ho Desh me padhe likhe baki sab ko to tumne apne hisab se galat sabit kar hi dia hai 😂

  • @k.naveenkumar8470
    @k.naveenkumar8470 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When we see some hope at the same time if we enter comment section we will loose all hopes.

  • @litin1102001
    @litin1102001 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I agree with you, but after 2014, anyone can see the hate injected into the society and the view of the hindu nationalist state that is used to win elections. No matter what is said, at the ground level it has become clear that there is hate speech, lynchings, and the biased way the society treats its minorities. Pre 2014 you could see many ministers from various walks of life but now it’s shunned a certain section out of that as well. People are busy ignoring problems like inflation and unemployment since they are made to focus on different creations of jihaad by the media lab in India. We as a society have lost focus on actual development.

  • @SUMITSINGH-nh3bs
    @SUMITSINGH-nh3bs 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No sir ravish ji is not a critical journalist he is a biased journalist you can check his last videos his every video is on aap and 7-8 videos on Sanjay sir after getting bail..
    I don't no any unbiased journalist but R Ranganathan sir is the unbiased person who criticises both sides!!

  • @statusworld2788
    @statusworld2788 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Dhruv Rathee, Ravish Kumar is an one man army.

  • @husainsariya4060
    @husainsariya4060 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    i dont understand one thing from this channel, are the videos, clippings of live classes or something?

  • @anandranjane6232
    @anandranjane6232 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But dr b r ambedkar did not add the word secularism in continuation.

  • @ANO-123
    @ANO-123 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +267

    Ravish unbiased journalists....🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣.
    India is secular only because Hindus are in majority.... Not because of the Constitution.

    • @shanblues7257
      @shanblues7257 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +81

      India is secular because secularism was promoted among the freedom fighters who fought for Indian Independence including Bhagat Singh, Netaji and Mahatma Gandhi. There were always people like Savarkar and Godse who opposed secularism. But, unfortunately, today, the BJP is using Hinduism to promote extremism among the masses. This is dangerous to the secular fabric of India. It's better to be aware of this, than to be complacent by boosting your ego that Hindu named people cannot be radicalised. They can be and they have been.

    • @anmolbedi58
      @anmolbedi58 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

      @@shanblues7257 ah yes yes freedom fighter mahatma lmao

    • @anmolbedi58
      @anmolbedi58 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      @@1stRizzMaster ironically my grandfather was in azad hind fauj jokes on u

    • @vbond585
      @vbond585 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Fir to 2014 ke baad bhi Secular rahana chaiye.. ab 2024 mein dekh lenten hain.. max 10 years is what I will give ..

    • @HumanityWatch
      @HumanityWatch 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      ​@@shanblues7257 you forgot to add nehru 😂 by the way India wasn't a secular state before emergency

  • @internetuser4112
    @internetuser4112 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    With enough political power, a ruling party can change anything, including the basic structure of the construction. It's foolish and misleading to think that the constitution cannot be altered to turn India into a Hindu Rashtra.
    Rather than giving empty sermons and practising faux centrism to come across as impartial, Naman should display the courage to call out BJP's dangerous ideology

  • @thinkingstraight2309
    @thinkingstraight2309 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Agreed - The constitution will not change in one day, but India is definitely seeing a slow and steady movement towards becoming an apartheid / fascist state. When you see regularly recurring instances of laws being applied differently to individuals based on their caste, religion, etc, it is clearly a sign of apartheid and racism. Add to that the fact that several documented criminals are treated as heroes (even by the government in some cases) for committing crimes against a specific group - and you will understand what I mean.
    Remember - Hitler didn't come into power in one day and just start killing Jews. isarel was not born in a day either. Apartheid in SA did not happen in one day. India was not colonized by Britain in one day. Its always a slow and gradual movement and currently India has come pretty far in that direction

  • @pushpendukumar7152
    @pushpendukumar7152 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The irony in this video is Ravish Kumar do critical journalism 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @SherlockH0lmes
    @SherlockH0lmes 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Section 144 Imposed (along with internet ban) In Ladakh to Suppress huge protest organised on 7th April........ Democracy 🤡 🤣
    And the Protest was Against China Encroaching Thousands of Acres of Land in Ladakh......Modi Be like : bhut ho gya tumhara ab, China ko kuch nhi bolne ka💀🤣

    • @Upanishadicsaint
      @Upanishadicsaint 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Have you watched news before 2014 like what happened in Kashmir and In the Naxalites region. Modi completely changed all this and now CG and Jharkhandlike areas are changing fast. No naxalism

    • @AkshayPandey-vp5bf
      @AkshayPandey-vp5bf 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Upanishadicsainthe will not answer this because no one teach them about these things they are just puppet of Foreign teaching nothing else..they didn’t know the meaning of Democracy that’s why they make lough on Democracy.if Modi decided to be u democratic for one day,u will see those people Hanging on I dia gate..they are idiot don’t teach them

    • @BoomBoom-sc7ek
      @BoomBoom-sc7ek 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They doesn't doing because they want it stretch it internal officers are not ready to give that
      Even cpi named party said they will reverse article 370
      So it will take time but if in this session it wil not solved it's definitely a fault
      And many states strt to ask center government for their special status
      That the main problem
      Eastern states are first that will come to get it

    • @msk223
      @msk223 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ladakh was occupied in 1958 but we came to know in 1962 and now you are saying 1000s of acres are Occupied 😂

    • @BoomBoom-sc7ek
      @BoomBoom-sc7ek 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@msk223 caa and nrc is main problem

  • @prashantshah1396
    @prashantshah1396 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One more disagreement sir. Fundamental rights are the very basis of the constitution then how can that be changed and today's government wants to change the entiire constitution and their supporters don't realise that even if the new constitution would make bharat a hindu rashtra but it will take away their fundamental rights which is extremely dangerous.

  • @sneakpeek6031
    @sneakpeek6031 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think only nationalists should be made IAS...no caste no creed no religion ...only nationalists shud get ..Interview should be based on that...Long live revolution karna hai to kahi aur jai..I strongly believe psychometry test , caligraphy to understand the personality should be included as interview criteria...Govt service ke chakkar main IAS banna should be banned

  • @pmt7483
    @pmt7483 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What everyone fails to do is constructive criticism. It’s very easy to point out flaws, but a humongous challenge to suggest ways to mitigate, eradicate or manage the challenge.
    Ravish was not critical of congress govt, rather the scams of congress govt were so huge that he had no choice but to criticise. There has never been a critical journalist in the world, everyone has some agenda which originates internally or externally.

  • @RichardSaladin
    @RichardSaladin 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rise of Nazi style politics and atmosphere you cannot ignore or deny. Perhaps the result of selling Hitlers books openly for decades and orgs that openly subscribe to Hitler's ideology, contributed to this.

  • @adityachandrasekharan1356
    @adityachandrasekharan1356 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    First of all, we should be using pluralist instead of secular. Secular means giving up your religious identity whereas plural means acknowledging that you have a certain cultural/religious character, but will give freedom to members of other religions. Also, Bharat has remained pluralist not because of the constitution, but because of the inherent nature of our civilization. It is only because of the Hindu majority that we have been able to remain pluralist

  • @Nikita-qx7ij
    @Nikita-qx7ij 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Glad to see support for Ravish Kumar. Sir, I completed History, Economics and Geography episodes from the MisFits Portal - I can solve almost all questions with 95-98% accuracy. However, I'm finding it a little difficult to solve questions around Polity - would you have any advice on what can I do?

    • @namanshrivastava
      @namanshrivastava  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hi Nikita, don't worry. I will make sure that you all solve questions in the class - I will wrap up FRs, DPSPs, FD, and Parliament - and will do the first leg of questions basis conjectures in the classes. Keep on revising the episodes. don't focus on multiple sources. Stick around with polity for another 10-15 days. Good luck!

    • @abhasaxena4694
      @abhasaxena4694 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Can you tell where is going Mr chavish Kumar on बदायूं case...

    • @satviksharma78
      @satviksharma78 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@abhasaxena4694 Which unbiased TH-camr u follow bro ? Please enlighten us.

    • @nidheeshkumar6760
      @nidheeshkumar6760 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@satviksharma78their is no unbiased youtuber or news outlet in the world let aside India along with this one he is pure communist. And their is no shifty constitution in the world than India which itself is promotes inequality like caste,religion,tribe,non tribe the list goes on and on in which world an orphan is more privileged than any caste and even after you declare themselves atheist but couldn't remove their caste and our secularism is so amazing it gives freedom to every religion .if I have a religion where human sacrifice is norm than our constitution grant them right to do so etc.

    • @satviksharma78
      @satviksharma78 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nidheeshkumar6760 If u are not happy with the constituion feel free to shift to the country of ur liking because constituion is here to stay.

  • @DCM2463
    @DCM2463 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Today the mainstream media in India is biased in its reporting. So people look for youtubers and other media to get their news which hopefully is unbiased. Critical fair and balanced news is a thing of the past.

  • @anirudhalenka4404
    @anirudhalenka4404 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Secularism wass not a fundamental right in the basic structure of the constitution
    It was added later

  • @RupamSaha-by1wv
    @RupamSaha-by1wv 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ravish Kumar is unbiased 😂😂

  • @sayeedrizwan4564
    @sayeedrizwan4564 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice 😢