FN Herstal solved this exact problem in the 90's with the design of the magazine for the P90. they use a carousel chute that leaves no space as all for the item to rotate; the chute changes the orientation.
I feel like I must be missing some design criteria that necessitated the part being free dropped instead of rolled/guided with a more contained path...?
@@BallisticTech Gravity is free? Not sure either. I kinda figured he would cut a slot in the tubing that the magazine would fit around, but that would leave a lot of air escaping, and probably jostle around the remaining ammo...
But why does it have to freefall such a long way? Just because gravity is free? The first redesign would have worked much better if they was dropped minimum distance instead
@@ErikLevholt i think that might be because the component that releases the screews from the magazine one at a time is circular, so the screws pretty much need to fall for at least 1r of that component.
That magazine is satisfying and a smart reuse of off-the-shelf components when needed. For inspiration, you may want to watch old Factory Made or How It's Made episodes, you'll get a lot of ideas on how manufacturers work through similar issues. 11:48 - You may have noticed this, but your parametric design has the screw holes un-constrained, so they end up overlapping the O-rings in some configurations.
Richtig cooles ding. Ich arbeite selbst in der instandhaltung bei einem Automobilzulieferer und hab viel mit solchen dingen zu tun. Da muss die schraube immer richtig fallen. Auch beim zig-tausenden mal. Egal ob schraube, niete, mutter etc.... Wenn man dass mal flüssig hinkriegt, vom sortiertopf zum schlauch in den roboterkopf nietpistole. Is der wahnsinn. Respekt und viel erfolg damit👍👍
That perfect shot earned my subscription! Congratulations on the success. I know the “perfect shot” wasn’t the end goal but it was definitely an awesome way to celebrate 😎
I thought IT would be better to have a Magazin which ist more narrow. The screw slides down with its head on the right wall of the Magazin and has a lot of place to Touch down on the beveled bottom and much more to the left when IT Starts to rotate. My Idea was to have the Magazin smaller so that the place to rotate is gone. So a simple 'insert' of an rectangulare placeholder would reduce the space in the Magazine and the screw would fall down more over the Outlet. What do you think ?
@@thingsmymacdoes But the thing is, there is just empty space. You don't see any mechanism in this area moving or sitting. I rather think it's accessability, but considering how critical of a cause of error this uncontrolled bounce is, it's better to sacrifice anything to ensure the control of the process.
I still do custom automation modules for my customers sometimes and i consider myself good at design ideas, but you creativity and work are humbling... way to go! I love the way you think. Ivan from Sofia, Bulgaria
Your content is awesome! Love it. At 11:20 I was a bit confused that the screws were coming out in the wrong direction. Of course I get that it is more about showing the mechanism of the compressed air…
Thank you! Aarggg i was waiting for this comment. I understand that you are confused. The parts at 11:20 are welding studs that are welded head first onto metalsheets. So head first is correct (only for these parts). I also realized while editing that this is confusing as hell. I had tested them for a potential customer and filmed them in the meantime and just used the footage.. was explaining that in the video, but had to cut it out for "flow" reasons
I feel like the first design would have worked if instead of a straight ramp it was a convex ramp. If the ramp was convex the tail of the screw would hit the ramp surface and stop the screw from over-rotating on bounce.
I had the same idea too, but the first thing that came to my mind was to limit the freefall where it can spin, from the sides. If designed to a specific thread diam, make it as narrow for the threaded part as can move freely. Drops free, but the head is limited not to flip over. The head diam doesn't matter so much as long as it's bigger than the threads space. Gravity feeds it thread first, unless it somehow makes a backflip, and in that the ramping might help!
I just found your channel and i have to say: rarely am i so quickly hooked but you had me in the first 5 seconds. And then it kept going! really nice job!
What fun! You tell a good story, and you have some mad skills, so well done. Very pleased to hear that you have help and that you're growing: I really enjoyed the previous series so I'm looking forward to seeing what comes next.
Puh, already thought you had left YT... 🙂 Glad to see yet another amazing update on this awesome project. Thanks a lot for sharing your progress so openly, really exceptional! Cheers from Remscheid.
As a testament to the quality of your content: at time of typing this video has been seeen 28k times and there are 2.2K up votes. I challenge anyone to find a video with such a high like/view ratio! Great work and inspiring!
Its actually quite average. I used to pay a lot of attention to this. I mean its probably on the "high side", but I managed to pretty quickly find a video with 100k views and 17k upvotes. It depends on the style/genre though. With music, the ratio might be even higher. edit: But I guess its sort of rare with this type of engineering video 🤔
Add a watermark to your slowmo and other high quality shots, unless you're ok with people using your content for any and all purposes without mentionning your channel.
This is THE coolest shoot in youtube history. Only cooler shoot would be if you manage to shoot the bolt, make it rotate like bullet, shoot it into a nut and the rotary motion will screw it self in...
I am 3 minutes in and guess , weight is to similar thread and head. others are MUCH more variant in weight. Lets continue,-- Ha, boy was I off. Great stuff and fix. The The screw through washer, genius and awesome both. Love watching your mind at work and PLAY!
Wow ... :-) What a nice surprise at the end of summer. Your videos are unique. This is yet another great well executed and thought out invention 🙂 Love how you fit the whole days, weeks of the thought process into a nice video. Even though the time between the videos as way too long :-) I am proud to be a patreon ! (Oh, are you hiring ? I want to be employee #2) . And the ball-spring, click loading of the magazin is just awesome in its simplicity !
If youre gonna do this like a rifle mag, copy the rifle mag and get the screws a lot closer to the chamber so they can't flip. Youre doing it the Teutonic way of over complicating things. Just move the screws closer and youre done.
I wonder if an optical inspection phase coupled with a pneumatic or mechanical gating phase could help get the defects down to about 1:100,000. This defect rate would allow for a run of 1000 parts to have a 99% chance of being defect free - definitely a boon for the operator! So far, I am thinking of an active system based on computer vision, with either an air jet or sliding block diverter. Sensors: The system has two sensors: - Upstream from the diverter, a 1d lidar sensor and computer vision kernel scans the bolt profile and provides a go/no-go signal - Close to the diverter, we have laser gates to verify part arrival and velocity, and trigger state changes - We learn the go/no-go transform offline: - By simulating the bolt's optical profile using its cad data - Or by running the part through the sensor to learn its profile Sliding Block Diverter: In a mechanical diverter, the tube feeds into a spring loaded diverter block. - If the part is flipped, a solenoid shifts the block so that the part enters a tube to the "reject bucket". - Otherwise, it shoots through the diverter block. - A sliding o-ring seal between the shunt block and outgoing tube seals minimizes pressure drop Jet Diverter: In a pneumatic diverter, the tube feeds into a section with an ejection slot. - During normal operation, the bolt shots past the ejection slot, pulled by the vacuum of a second accelerator. - If the bolt is defective, an air jet knocks it into the reject bucket. - If the reject bucket is sealed and maintained at line pressure, the second accelerator may be unnecessary. All this amounts to incredible bike shedding if we can't carefully model the reliability of the sensor and diverter, and persuade ourselves that this scales to 1:100,000 defect rates. I'll see if I can find a paper that lets us do some helpful napkin math here.
If you are using after effects for the diagram, you can go to layer > transform > orientation > oriente along path. Then you can draw a path copy and paste in position and the screw will curve automatically with the path. Making the bends of the tube etc.
Your videos are amazing, and have inspired me🎉🎉🎉, I do get "edged" thro out the video because you stop talking or it has a pause, one of the funniest things is when you have a video on the right and then I goes back to you talking in front of your "drawing board" I stare at your wall think it's another video
I enjoy the opportunity to watch another creative’s process, thanks! I think that your previous design could also work with a parametric change. An asymmetrical v shape with a small bumper on the head side and a curve for the tail side to spin with a width at the top of the v that is slightly wider than the hardware you’re sorting is long. A claw or fang shape if that makes sense. The head will cause the hardware to spin when it hits the bumper and then the narrowing shape will prevent it from over rotating. The width of the funnel as well as the curves would depend on the length of the hardware but that’s just a little bit of math and the computer does the hard work.
Now that's some seriously good fan service. (I'm still a fan of using gravity to deliver as it's one resource that never gets turned off.) Really impressive tolerances, and those stacking units are yum.
10:31 Is there an Existing OS 3D Printed O-Ring Slicing Jig? If not that may be a nice thing to make if you are cutting a TON of o-rings (If it would save time/effort that is, also I’m commenting this pre-finishing the video and will delete it if you already mention this!)
8:46 im sorry but this was a little silly. What rifle are you interpreting?? I've never seen a gun that drops its bullet 10 cm to load it into the barrel, the only reason this still has the issue is that you didnt bother to fix the issue in the first place? Havent finished the video yet but i feel like the first idea was made without the first issue in mind.
Dampning maybe? I like your first mechanism more, and maybe a simple material change lining the edges that the screws bounce off just need to be dampened.
This is absolutely awesome! I've been watching and waiting for you to post, but I don't remember all the specifics, so feel free to ignore my suggestion if it doesn't fit your project plan or you're already doing something similar. I also don't have a ton of experience with automated systems so I could be way off. I think it's already very marketable as a manual system, but I think what you need to really make this more widely marketable is software to control it all and update a database automatically. Or even have it be controllable from work orders from ERP systems. Like having 3 levels of available systems. Level 1 would be fully "manually" controlled where you choose how many of each from the control panel and it doesn't do any tracking. Level 2 would be controlled by some simple software that keeps and works off it's own database. And Level 3 (Where the BIG money would be) is a system that can take work orders from popular ERP systems and auto-update inventory levels. Level 3 would probably require some consulting work for install and integrating it with the customers process, but that's where the big company's would most likely be based on what I know about manufacturing. Medium and small companies would probably get by with a level 1 or 2 system or figure out the integration themselves if they purchased a level 3. The programming to hook everything together to a single controller might be pretty simple like WS2812b individually addressable LED's?..... maybe you already have all this figured out though. Again, I could be way off on what you are looking for out of the project and this is just my thoughts from an outside perspective. I love your videos and watching you solve all of these problems! Keep on Keepn' on man!
I was windering why not a tpu dampan/linging/ insert based on each akward screw size but this is a far superior over engineered German design then my tea break english odd job solution. Best if luck with the business you deserve it. Remember the right people can 10x or 100x your business
I do realize that there might not be enough space for this but if you'd add a snail shape colinear to the presure line the screws could slide into place instead of falling and bouncing (and flipping) around.
In my experience with part feeders, never allow stubborn parts much free movement in air. Where that becomes an issue avoid bouncy hard surfaces and free space by controlling the part into the next transition or redirect. While mid-air assembly looks cool, it's impractical once the parts are no longer captured in path where timing and alignment are critical. Drop them out of the escapement or feed path when together. The best parts of your video's are the trial and error, cause and effect solutions letting it teach you how to rectify the issue.
I think some kind of an escapement mechanism that locks the column above, drops a screw and repeat would have worked, it would have minimized the fall distance and also seal the tube from leaking pressure into the screw tank. Great job indeed, also love the debate in the comments
Hi, first of all, very nice modeling with not only functionality in mind but also esthetics! As an idea to solve the deviating rotaions, Maybe you can decrease the amount of bounces by let them enter in an angle? This way you can also use longer bolts aswell. The revolver type of loading as mentioned in the comments is laso promising but maybe does not fit your box design. All the best!
Amazing stuff! Looking forward to the bizz video :) Its amazing to see your Idea become a sustaining Business. If you can make it into an open ecosystem for others to expand on that would be just absolutely cool. Just a thought, but maybe you could even colaborate with some other youtubers on building a sustainable open source/hardware micromanufacture ecosystem. Thinking about lumen-pnp for example ^^ just imagining to see a part go from digital to physical on the push off a button in your basement is putting a smile on my face for what our future could look like some day 😄
Now, add rifling to the tube so that the screw spins and have it drop nuts instead of washers, so that the screws directly thread on ;)
was thinking the exact same thing ..
he can do both, insert the screw into the washer and then in a second stage it thread into the nut, double insert and double chalenge 😉😃
@@tareksma1 😃
Driverless screwing using the screws intertia
use inertia/speed to set the correct torque 😊
for those who are wondering what is going on, This guy made a machine to count screws once and now he is enjoying rabbithole.
We just weigh them. 😂
@@markrainford1219 too easy
I've missed you
"Mom, stop posting on my TH-cam videos!" - just kidding.
i've missed him too tbh
+1
We missed you
FN Herstal solved this exact problem in the 90's with the design of the magazine for the P90. they use a carousel chute that leaves no space as all for the item to rotate; the chute changes the orientation.
Yeah, seeing screw bounce on the slope, I wondered if a simple S curve would have helped enough to force the tail down the tube first.
I feel like I must be missing some design criteria that necessitated the part being free dropped instead of rolled/guided with a more contained path...?
@@BallisticTech Gravity is free? Not sure either. I kinda figured he would cut a slot in the tubing that the magazine would fit around, but that would leave a lot of air escaping, and probably jostle around the remaining ammo...
But why does it have to freefall such a long way? Just because gravity is free? The first redesign would have worked much better if they was dropped minimum distance instead
@@ErikLevholt i think that might be because the component that releases the screews from the magazine one at a time is circular, so the screws pretty much need to fall for at least 1r of that component.
HOLEY SHOT!
That opening shot was insanely cool!
That magazine is satisfying and a smart reuse of off-the-shelf components when needed. For inspiration, you may want to watch old Factory Made or How It's Made episodes, you'll get a lot of ideas on how manufacturers work through similar issues.
11:48 - You may have noticed this, but your parametric design has the screw holes un-constrained, so they end up overlapping the O-rings in some configurations.
You know it's gonna be a good day when Christopher Helmke uploads a new video
he dont f*** around
it's always serious business, I appreciate it a lot.
12:41 = Coolest shot in youtube history. Wouldn't matter if it had taken 100,000 attempts. Well done.
Richtig cooles ding. Ich arbeite selbst in der instandhaltung bei einem Automobilzulieferer und hab viel mit solchen dingen zu tun. Da muss die schraube immer richtig fallen. Auch beim zig-tausenden mal. Egal ob schraube, niete, mutter etc....
Wenn man dass mal flüssig hinkriegt, vom sortiertopf zum schlauch in den roboterkopf nietpistole. Is der wahnsinn.
Respekt und viel erfolg damit👍👍
Hut ab! Ich bin selber Konstrukteur und sehe sofort wie viel Arbeit da drin steckt! Vor Allem gefällt mir dein "Cleanes" Design.
Freut mich, danke!
I've only seen the first 5 seconds, and I'm just yelling. Who are you? What are you? Bravo.
you have such a good day of youtube ahead, im jealous
@@vw9753 Unfortunately, I've already watched all his videos) But what I've just seen, I'm really excited.
Old timers call it the new SUBSCRIBER reaction ! 😁 Welcome!
Just wait for the next 30 seconds :o
god damn that box array is amazing
it's true. who else can make this level of interest for boxes??
That perfect shot earned my subscription! Congratulations on the success. I know the “perfect shot” wasn’t the end goal but it was definitely an awesome way to celebrate 😎
Why are you giving them that much room to fall and generate energy for the bounce? couldn't you just make the chamber shorter (height-wise)?
probably because of the mechanism that retains the next screw
First thing that I thought as well, it definitely can be made shorter
I thought IT would be better to have a Magazin which ist more narrow.
The screw slides down with its head on the right wall of the Magazin and has a lot of place to Touch down on the beveled bottom and much more to the left when IT Starts to rotate.
My Idea was to have the Magazin smaller so that the place to rotate is gone.
So a simple 'insert' of an rectangulare placeholder would reduce the space in the Magazine and the screw would fall down more over the Outlet.
What do you think ?
@@thingsmymacdoes But the thing is, there is just empty space. You don't see any mechanism in this area moving or sitting.
I rather think it's accessability, but considering how critical of a cause of error this uncontrolled bounce is, it's better to sacrifice anything to ensure the control of the process.
Then it wouldn't be big enough for larger screws.
You sir are going places!! .... I'm very anxious to see what other amazing things you design/build over your life time!!
As a fellow engineer, i'd say "Bravo" - that this is brilliant!
I still do custom automation modules for my customers sometimes and i consider myself good at design ideas, but you creativity and work are humbling... way to go! I love the way you think. Ivan from Sofia, Bulgaria
That shoot! Awesome XD
And also, as usual, the engineering of the whole thing is just so well done, bravo!
Your content is awesome! Love it.
At 11:20 I was a bit confused that the screws were coming out in the wrong direction. Of course I get that it is more about showing the mechanism of the compressed air…
Thank you! Aarggg i was waiting for this comment. I understand that you are confused. The parts at 11:20 are welding studs that are welded head first onto metalsheets.
So head first is correct (only for these parts).
I also realized while editing that this is confusing as hell.
I had tested them for a potential customer and filmed them in the meantime and just used the footage..
was explaining that in the video, but had to cut it out for "flow" reasons
Oh I see. Now it makes perfect sense. No worries, imperfections create sympathy.
I feel like the first design would have worked if instead of a straight ramp it was a convex ramp. If the ramp was convex the tail of the screw would hit the ramp surface and stop the screw from over-rotating on bounce.
I had the same idea too, but the first thing that came to my mind was to limit the freefall where it can spin, from the sides. If designed to a specific thread diam, make it as narrow for the threaded part as can move freely. Drops free, but the head is limited not to flip over. The head diam doesn't matter so much as long as it's bigger than the threads space. Gravity feeds it thread first, unless it somehow makes a backflip, and in that the ramping might help!
or just slanted the opening, to limit the amount of bounce it could have. (kind of like a zig zag instead of a triangle)
You sold on this whole channel on just the intro. That is rare.
Crazy! Anything is possible, but your brain is super, as is your patience and persistence. Genius ...
It feels so good to have you back with such an AMAZING Content! 🔥
I am struggling making a case with Tinkercad while this guy is throwing bolts into washers using pneumatics and a hose😆 HAHA Nice Job!
I have no idea how you got so good at demonstrating this stuff so quickly - but good on you, really inspiring stuff!
I get goosebumps when i watch your project videos,what else can i say!!! thank you for posting all your thoughts into this,keep it up!
I just found your channel and i have to say: rarely am i so quickly hooked but you had me in the first 5 seconds. And then it kept going! really nice job!
By far the best engineering TH-camr.
Couldn't you have just minimized the fall distance?
For real! We don’t see bullets falling into the chamber. Solenoid pushing the built RIGHT into the “barrel”
What if he wants to use it with a short screw with a large head?
@@VAL9THOU well the tube diameter stops him from using X large heads so he could adjust the drop distance to account for this fact.
@@johhnyknoxville3948true. There could be different fall distances for each screw type, also the angular slide part could be made removable
1:56. Happened to be wearing high end headphones... That was trippy. I could hear them falling/rolling behind me.
pinnacle of engineering
What fun! You tell a good story, and you have some mad skills, so well done. Very pleased to hear that you have help and that you're growing: I really enjoyed the previous series so I'm looking forward to seeing what comes next.
just watched the whole series and subscribed
Great videos with high quality animations and great explanations
Very good part quality and finish. Well executed
Puh, already thought you had left YT... 🙂 Glad to see yet another amazing update on this awesome project. Thanks a lot for sharing your progress so openly, really exceptional!
Cheers from Remscheid.
As a testament to the quality of your content: at time of typing this video has been seeen 28k times and there are 2.2K up votes. I challenge anyone to find a video with such a high like/view ratio! Great work and inspiring!
Its actually quite average. I used to pay a lot of attention to this. I mean its probably on the "high side", but I managed to pretty quickly find a video with 100k views and 17k upvotes.
It depends on the style/genre though.
With music, the ratio might be even higher.
edit:
But I guess its sort of rare with this type of engineering video 🤔
But seriously, well done.
Thank you!
Du bist der Inbegriff deutscher Ingenieurskunst für mich!
Loved the whole video from start to finish! Incredible stuff! You've got a new sub!
I subscribed right after seeing the title of the video, I knew this would be good and I was not dissapointed. :D
Add a watermark to your slowmo and other high quality shots, unless you're ok with people using your content for any and all purposes without mentionning your channel.
This is THE coolest shoot in youtube history. Only cooler shoot would be if you manage to shoot the bolt, make it rotate like bullet, shoot it into a nut and the rotary motion will screw it self in...
Oh, ich freue mich auf mehr Videos von dir! Einfach faszinierend was du schaffst!
1:12 Aluprofile+3D Druckteile+Euronormbehälter= ganz große Liebe!
That was very impressive. I'm glad it was recommended.
Appreciate the shout Christopher!
Junge junge, dachte schon es kommt nichts mehr! Top Video!
Great video, as always! Thank you for sharing your progress it is such a pleasure to watch!
I am 3 minutes in and guess , weight is to similar thread and head. others are MUCH more variant in weight. Lets continue,-- Ha, boy was I off. Great stuff and fix. The The screw through washer, genius and awesome both. Love watching your mind at work and PLAY!
We are biased with you 😊 That is the best trickshot ever!
Wow ... :-) What a nice surprise at the end of summer. Your videos are unique. This is yet another great well executed and thought out invention 🙂 Love how you fit the whole days, weeks of the thought process into a nice video. Even though the time between the videos as way too long :-) I am proud to be a patreon ! (Oh, are you hiring ? I want to be employee #2) . And the ball-spring, click loading of the magazin is just awesome in its simplicity !
Incredible stuff!!
Da hast du uns aber lange warten lassen. Schön das du zurück bist.
Damn, I saw a lot of learning today, I thought I hadn't subscribed to your channel, but it turns out I've been subscribing to you for a long time
Thanks for sharing your interesting journey, I really enjoy it!
The perfect shot is awesome!!! Haha. Great work
Great video, and great shot man!
If youre gonna do this like a rifle mag, copy the rifle mag and get the screws a lot closer to the chamber so they can't flip. Youre doing it the Teutonic way of over complicating things. Just move the screws closer and youre done.
welcome back Built to Scale [Rhythm Heaven]
Legend has it this is the only way to put together next years German cars
I wonder if an optical inspection phase coupled with a pneumatic or mechanical gating phase could help get the defects down to about 1:100,000. This defect rate would allow for a run of 1000 parts to have a 99% chance of being defect free - definitely a boon for the operator!
So far, I am thinking of an active system based on computer vision, with either an air jet or sliding block diverter.
Sensors:
The system has two sensors:
- Upstream from the diverter, a 1d lidar sensor and computer vision kernel scans the bolt profile and provides a go/no-go signal
- Close to the diverter, we have laser gates to verify part arrival and velocity, and trigger state changes
- We learn the go/no-go transform offline:
- By simulating the bolt's optical profile using its cad data
- Or by running the part through the sensor to learn its profile
Sliding Block Diverter:
In a mechanical diverter, the tube feeds into a spring loaded diverter block.
- If the part is flipped, a solenoid shifts the block so that the part enters a tube to the "reject bucket".
- Otherwise, it shoots through the diverter block.
- A sliding o-ring seal between the shunt block and outgoing tube seals minimizes pressure drop
Jet Diverter:
In a pneumatic diverter, the tube feeds into a section with an ejection slot.
- During normal operation, the bolt shots past the ejection slot, pulled by the vacuum of a second accelerator.
- If the bolt is defective, an air jet knocks it into the reject bucket.
- If the reject bucket is sealed and maintained at line pressure, the second accelerator may be unnecessary.
All this amounts to incredible bike shedding if we can't carefully model the reliability of the sensor and diverter, and persuade ourselves that this scales to 1:100,000 defect rates. I'll see if I can find a paper that lets us do some helpful napkin math here.
A proper engineer. My goodness.
We need more pioneers like you. 👍
Oh hell yeah, another Christopher Helmke video. It's been 6 months?!
You are my hero. Perfect shot.
If you are using after effects for the diagram, you can go to layer > transform > orientation > oriente along path.
Then you can draw a path copy and paste in position and the screw will curve automatically with the path. Making the bends of the tube etc.
Happy to be back for season 2!
Schöne Grüße aus AT :^)
Hey please Keep up the good work.
And please Keep us postet. You have very, very interesting content.
Gut gemacht!
Epic comeback!
Can't believe its already been almost 7 months since your last upload. Time flies!
Your videos are amazing, and have inspired me🎉🎉🎉, I do get "edged" thro out the video because you stop talking or it has a pause, one of the funniest things is when you have a video on the right and then I goes back to you talking in front of your "drawing board" I stare at your wall think it's another video
dude you are insane in the best possible way!!!!
I enjoy the opportunity to watch another creative’s process, thanks! I think that your previous design could also work with a parametric change. An asymmetrical v shape with a small bumper on the head side and a curve for the tail side to spin with a width at the top of the v that is slightly wider than the hardware you’re sorting is long. A claw or fang shape if that makes sense. The head will cause the hardware to spin when it hits the bumper and then the narrowing shape will prevent it from over rotating. The width of the funnel as well as the curves would depend on the length of the hardware but that’s just a little bit of math and the computer does the hard work.
I am pretty sure that the bolts that go upside down are ceiling bolts, or maybe Australian floor bolts.
they go into electric car battery packs, but maybe they are similar!
You could curve the path of the screw between the magazine and the chamber out of the XY plane to lock the orientation but allow movement
Indeed the coolest shot 🎉
What a satisfying shot.
Now that's some seriously good fan service. (I'm still a fan of using gravity to deliver as it's one resource that never gets turned off.) Really impressive tolerances, and those stacking units are yum.
But gravity gets re-oriented or momentarily "turned off" if the machine is mobile. And even fixed installations can become mobile in an earthquake 😅
10:31 Is there an Existing OS 3D Printed O-Ring Slicing Jig? If not that may be a nice thing to make if you are cutting a TON of o-rings
(If it would save time/effort that is, also I’m commenting this pre-finishing the video and will delete it if you already mention this!)
8:46 im sorry but this was a little silly. What rifle are you interpreting?? I've never seen a gun that drops its bullet 10 cm to load it into the barrel, the only reason this still has the issue is that you didnt bother to fix the issue in the first place? Havent finished the video yet but i feel like the first idea was made without the first issue in mind.
Oh cool prototype 2 is done the gun way but using a vacuum instead (which honestly i thought would happen at some point so yippee)
Dampning maybe? I like your first mechanism more, and maybe a simple material change lining the edges that the screws bounce off just need to be dampened.
I love the 'Money Shot' ...screw into the washer 😂
This is absolutely awesome! I've been watching and waiting for you to post, but I don't remember all the specifics, so feel free to ignore my suggestion if it doesn't fit your project plan or you're already doing something similar. I also don't have a ton of experience with automated systems so I could be way off.
I think it's already very marketable as a manual system, but I think what you need to really make this more widely marketable is software to control it all and update a database automatically. Or even have it be controllable from work orders from ERP systems. Like having 3 levels of available systems. Level 1 would be fully "manually" controlled where you choose how many of each from the control panel and it doesn't do any tracking. Level 2 would be controlled by some simple software that keeps and works off it's own database. And Level 3 (Where the BIG money would be) is a system that can take work orders from popular ERP systems and auto-update inventory levels. Level 3 would probably require some consulting work for install and integrating it with the customers process, but that's where the big company's would most likely be based on what I know about manufacturing. Medium and small companies would probably get by with a level 1 or 2 system or figure out the integration themselves if they purchased a level 3.
The programming to hook everything together to a single controller might be pretty simple like WS2812b individually addressable LED's?..... maybe you already have all this figured out though.
Again, I could be way off on what you are looking for out of the project and this is just my thoughts from an outside perspective.
I love your videos and watching you solve all of these problems! Keep on Keepn' on man!
No idea what use that machine is but it looks cool and I love some good engineering so I've subscribed.
Looks like you .... screwed up XD *insertcsisunglassesscene*
Great video as always, welcome back.
The factory must grow!
I was windering why not a tpu dampan/linging/ insert based on each akward screw size but this is a far superior over engineered German design then my tea break english odd job solution. Best if luck with the business you deserve it. Remember the right people can 10x or 100x your business
Umm... this is like watching someone build an empire from the very beginning, from bare metal! Amazing!
I do realize that there might not be enough space for this but if you'd add a snail shape colinear to the presure line the screws could slide into place instead of falling and bouncing (and flipping) around.
I think You can use revolver system (with an open exterior for feeding) for protect reverse screw. But it is design make thicker your device.
Daaaamn what a great trick shot ❤
In my experience with part feeders, never allow stubborn parts much free movement in air. Where that becomes an issue avoid bouncy hard surfaces and free space by controlling the part into the next transition or redirect. While mid-air assembly looks cool, it's impractical once the parts are no longer captured in path where timing and alignment are critical. Drop them out of the escapement or feed path when together. The best parts of your video's are the trial and error, cause and effect solutions letting it teach you how to rectify the issue.
I think some kind of an escapement mechanism that locks the column above, drops a screw and repeat would have worked, it would have minimized the fall distance and also seal the tube from leaking pressure into the screw tank. Great job indeed, also love the debate in the comments
Gratulations ! Nice work
Would you consider making a video on your Fusion 360 workflow? I'd love to see how you work through designs in realtime (in CAD).
Hi, first of all, very nice modeling with not only functionality in mind but also esthetics!
As an idea to solve the deviating rotaions, Maybe you can decrease the amount of bounces by let them enter in an angle? This way you can also use longer bolts aswell. The revolver type of loading as mentioned in the comments is laso promising but maybe does not fit your box design. All the best!
Amazing stuff! Looking forward to the bizz video :) Its amazing to see your Idea become a sustaining Business. If you can make it into an open ecosystem for others to expand on that would be just absolutely cool.
Just a thought, but maybe you could even colaborate with some other youtubers on building a sustainable open source/hardware micromanufacture ecosystem. Thinking about lumen-pnp for example ^^ just imagining to see a part go from digital to physical on the push off a button in your basement is putting a smile on my face for what our future could look like some day 😄
very cool! I am learning robotics and similar stuff, thank you for explaining details 👍
Amazing, great work
Also missed you and your contents :)