Origin of Plank's Constant | Birth of Quantum Mechanics | PHYSICA

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2024
  • #Physica #Planks #constant #Origin
    #PHYSICA
    An Initiative by a group of IIT Roorkee Scholars.
    Providing Free Education and Knowledge through Quality TH-cam videos is our goal!
    Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.

ความคิดเห็น • 200

  • @silent_traveller7
    @silent_traveller7 4 ปีที่แล้ว +176

    Wow, thanks for moving above marks and exams-and looking at subject for the sake of itself.

  • @shubhamuraon3552
    @shubhamuraon3552 2 ปีที่แล้ว +150

    I mean if they have taught me at school that 'h' stands for help it would have been more interesting, relatable and easier to learn this

    • @touristguy87
      @touristguy87 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      like you need to know why the letters were chosen for each equation to be interested in physics
      jesus how vapid can you be

    • @laurendoe168
      @laurendoe168 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I agree, knowing the background to the "unnecessary" aspects of physics can add to the enjoyment. I also did not know that the "h" came from the word "help," but am glad I now do.

    • @MictheEagle
      @MictheEagle 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@touristguy87 He literally said, "I mean if they have taught me at school that 'h' stands for help it would have been more interesting, relatable and easier to learn T*H*I*S" ... meaning, about Plank's constant. You're the one who's vapid.

    • @asicdathens
      @asicdathens 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Most likely 'Hilfe' , help in German

    • @laurendoe168
      @laurendoe168 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@asicdathens Yes, the video did say it was the German word for help.

  • @ab3040
    @ab3040 2 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    It's actually insane that this was discovered 100 years ago and now college students learn this their first year, and even plenty of high school students do

    • @bigsmall246
      @bigsmall246 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I like to think of it the reverse way - it was discovered 100yrs ago and yet 99% of the population doesn't know about it. It should be taught at secondary school

    • @ab3040
      @ab3040 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bigsmall246 this is pretty complex stuff tho
      I'm a mechanical engineer, and I don't fully understand it
      Alot of graduate students dont

    • @bigsmall246
      @bigsmall246 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@ab3040 it's really not that complicated. The underlying quantum mechanics are not fully understood, but the ultraviolet catastrophe itself is pretty easy to understand

    • @ab3040
      @ab3040 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@bigsmall246 yeah that's what I mean
      Quantum mechanics is tough
      Unlike "normal" physics we can't see it or test it by easy means

    • @a.pal_yt2018
      @a.pal_yt2018 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      History is full of bad jokes, I suppose

  • @douglasstrother6584
    @douglasstrother6584 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Planck's approach was to analyze the entropy of blackbody radiation as a function of energy. To make both high-frequency and low-frequency data consistent with the Second Law of Thermodynamics, he included an additional "guess" term proportional to the frequency (hf); this results in Planck's Law. Planck's subsequent application of Boltzmann's Statistical Mechanics to justify his guess then led to his revolutionary conclusion that the material of the walls emit and absorb radiation in discrete quanta.
    A paper titled "Planck’s Route to the Black Body Radiation Formula and Quantization" by Michael Fowler (7/25/08) gives a nice discussion.

  • @anugrahmathewprasad172
    @anugrahmathewprasad172 4 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Oooo this is a step up from the usual videos. The graphics as well.. and new refreshing type of content. Me likey!

  • @Skeptical_Numbat
    @Skeptical_Numbat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    Please use accurate *Scientific Nomenclature* when referring to *Scientific Experiments.*
    For example, at [1:20] *Planck* did Not put his *Theory* to a test, he put his *Hypothesis* to the test.
    A *Theory* is a highest, most robust conceptual explanation of an aspect of science, comprising of multiple *Scientific Laws,* *Facts* & perhaps thousands of disproved/proved *Hypotheses.*

    • @TheDavidlloydjones
      @TheDavidlloydjones 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Hey, no fair: TH-cam has a reputation to maintain: idiocy, inaccuracy, laziness in production. Physica is working hard to maintain that reputation.

    • @MrDino1953
      @MrDino1953 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheDavidlloydjones- no, the idiocy, inaccuracy and laziness is the job of the Republican Party.

  • @valeenoi2284
    @valeenoi2284 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If those people were living in our time, many would have called their discovery a "fake news".

  • @abhishekpatawari6871
    @abhishekpatawari6871 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    i never knew plack constant was written H because of help

  • @srijitayadav8460
    @srijitayadav8460 3 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    I am in 11th standard and it is taught is in very monotonous way.
    Thanks to this video for actually showing the past.
    Edit: Idk why there is a war going on in my comment section. Guys chill...

    • @veryprecious
      @veryprecious 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @Nuclear Nadal but syllabus are vast and we can't study continuously long to cover them

    • @mersenne2486
      @mersenne2486 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @Nuclear Nadal When you just study for exams and marks you loose the curiosity to explore further, even if you do you feel you have wasted your time.

    • @chitrangror8145
      @chitrangror8145 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Indians have discovered this 4000 years before Plank did .
      Read vedas . The quantum physics is derived from the vedas and the schrodinger equation is there in the upanishads 10,000 years before (or more than that) schrodinger came on earth
      Indians are the smartest..
      Also read what schrodinger had to say for the upanishads and sanatan dharm 🕉🙏
      Jai shree ram
      Har har mahadev 🙏🕉..

    • @Forever._.curious..
      @Forever._.curious.. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yaah please don't take Physics & math as taught in schools it's a HUGE MAGIC 🪄✨ BEAUTIFUL beyond it which schools are hiding explore it ..

    • @adityakaramcheti5389
      @adityakaramcheti5389 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@chitrangror8145 it's true that Hinduism has the most scientific information not everything you say is true. Rishis of old times were masters of philosophy than actual science. Only few of them did become scientists and mathematics.
      And many scientists like Oppenheimer took inspiration from philosophy of ancient Hindu texts than science.

  • @siddhantpathak9405
    @siddhantpathak9405 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Casually proceeded ....... To refute the established Laws of Physics!! Daaaayymn

  • @eurusholmes7
    @eurusholmes7 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Nice video 👍... If it's a series of videos my humble request, please upload the whole or share the link. Thanking you.

  • @lorenwilson8128
    @lorenwilson8128 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I think the birth of quantum mechanics rather had its roots in two other experiments, both of which Einstein explained. These are atomic spectra, and the photoelectric effect. Einstein explained the spacing of the lines observed when light from an excited gas (think a neon lamp) is passed through a prism. he used Plank's constant in the equation, showing that plank and he were correct. This proved that energy in the electrons around an atomic nucleus is quantized in steps, rather than being a continuous property. The second experiment, how a photocell works, also proved that the energy of a photon is quantized.

    • @nigelliam153
      @nigelliam153 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Schwarzschild played a part to. Amazing what these men achieved with such basic equipment. What could they have achieved with a modern lab today?

  • @mobilegameplay2090
    @mobilegameplay2090 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yo man I rewatch this video infinite amount of time

  • @murallivengadasalam1300
    @murallivengadasalam1300 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    More videos on these scientists who brought forward modern physics

  • @snowflakes4561
    @snowflakes4561 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Wooooooop
    So beautiful and knowledgeable

  • @professordanfurmanek3732
    @professordanfurmanek3732 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    As a wonderful physicist once said (AKA Dr. Don Lincoln) " Physics is everything!"

  • @rgudduu
    @rgudduu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Made me shiver w amazement. What wonderful brains those!

    • @chitrangror8145
      @chitrangror8145 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Indians have discovered this 4000 years before Plank did .
      Read vedas . The quantum physics is derived from the vedas and the schrodinger equation is there in the upanishads 10,000 years before (or more than that) schrodinger came on earth
      Indians are the smartest..
      Also read what schrodinger had to say for the upanishads and sanatan dharm 🕉🙏
      Jai shree ram
      Har har mahadev 🙏🕉...

    • @rgudduu
      @rgudduu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@chitrangror8145 , cite the Veda verse number if u know

    • @spectrum1909
      @spectrum1909 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@chitrangror8145 I am saying this as an indian, i am also proud of my culture and ancient works, but it's really not good spitting anything without knowing it properly, as it creates a bad image for all indians like we are arrogant and spit bs because it is reality that most of us don't know a damn about our culture so it is meaningless even if it was written in veda but we as an Indian have failed to develop that concept further besides we have abandoned those works. So we can't whining to other people to acknowledge our work besides we should work on our ancient knowledge and develop that or connect those knowledge with modern science etc but until then this false pride could lead us to nowhere as a community.

  • @scottmerritt9877
    @scottmerritt9877 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I highly recommend reading Thomas Kuhn’s book Blackbody Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity.

  • @hemantakumarmajhi3284
    @hemantakumarmajhi3284 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good experiment

  • @AdityaKantKushwaha
    @AdityaKantKushwaha 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I am just waiting Mr. Planck playing with his cool spectacles

  • @SpotterVideo
    @SpotterVideo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules:
    When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. (More spatial curvature). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are actually a part of the quarks. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" make sense based on this concept. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature.

  • @drstrangelove09
    @drstrangelove09 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I would love to know more about the device used. Do you happen to have a reference that shows the details?

  • @uniqueone4097
    @uniqueone4097 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Quantum Mechanics Is the Most Interesting Subject .....
    MAX PLANCK Is Known As The Father of Quantum Mechanics ❤️

  • @laurendoe168
    @laurendoe168 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I was hoping for something a little more in-depth - such as explaining in more detail why the "ultraviolet catastrophe" was so catastrophic to the theories at the time.

  • @subhadipsaha2667
    @subhadipsaha2667 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Ingenious. Inspiring. 💙

  • @davidrandell2224
    @davidrandell2224 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Juliana Mortenson website Forgotten Physics classicalized QM in 2010. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for final answers.

  • @jeeneetrk
    @jeeneetrk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good work!

  • @carlosalexandreFAT
    @carlosalexandreFAT 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The association of the main numbers in mathematics reflect numerical sequences that correspond to the dimensions of the Earth, the Moon, and the Sun, in the unit of measurement in meters, which is 1" (second) / 299,792,458 m/s (speed of light in a vacuum).
    Planck's constant.
    Planck’s constant: 6.63 × 10-34 m2 kg.
    Circumference of the Moon: 10,916.
    Gold equation: 1,618 ɸ
    (((6.63 ^ (10,916 x 10^-4 )) x 1.618 x (10^3)= 12,756.82
    Earth’s equatorial diameter: 12,756 km.
    Planck's temperature: 1.41679 x 10^32 Kelvin.
    Newton’s law of gravitation: G = 6.67 x 10^-11 N.m^2/kg^2.
    Speed of Sound: 340.29 m/s
    (1.41679 ^ 6.67) x 340.29 - 1 = 3,474.81
    Moon's diameter:: 3,474 km.
    Frequencies of the Planets of the Solar System:
    • Mercury: 141.27 Hz;
    • Venus: 221.23 Hz;
    • Earth: 7.83 Hz;
    • Mars: 144.72 Hz;
    • Jupiter: 183.58 Hz;
    • Saturn: 147.85 Hz;
    • Uranus: 432 Hz;
    • Neptune: 211.44 Hz;
    • Planck constant: 6.63 × 10^-34 m2 kg.
    • ((141.27 + 221.23 + 7.83 + 144.72 +183.58 + 147.85 + 432 + 211.44) ^ 6.63) x (10^-17) = 10,916.17
    Moon's circumference: 10,916 km.
    Orion: The Connection between Heaven and Earth eBook Kindle

  • @utkarshpuri3739
    @utkarshpuri3739 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Which movie or series is this?

  • @shariarmorshed5714
    @shariarmorshed5714 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What is the source of orginal Vedio ????

  • @official.rajarshidutta
    @official.rajarshidutta 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    can anyone provide a link to the full documentary

  • @israelsadovnik
    @israelsadovnik ปีที่แล้ว

    Where does unit (h) come from?
    To solve the blackbody problem, Max Planck introduced the quantum unit (h ), (h=Et ).
    The element (h) did not exist in physics before.
    The unit (h) does not come from formulas or equations.
    Planck introduced h-unit from the "heaven".
    Planck introduced the unit (h) intuitively, phenomenologically.
    Planck introduced the quantum of action "without recourse to explanations,
    metaphysical assumptions and traditional philosophical questions".
    For many years, Planck tried to find a rational (classical) explanation
    for his h-unit, but without success.
    We don't know where the unit (h) came from

  • @Kvltklassik
    @Kvltklassik 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Pronounciation of Kirchhoff - on point
    Pronunciation of formulae - on point
    Pronunciation of Planck - Plank -_-

    • @nightmare9597
      @nightmare9597 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      How do you pronounce it then?

    • @copywrite9396
      @copywrite9396 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nightmare9597 plahnk. With an ah sound like in father

    • @ethanhunt2263
      @ethanhunt2263 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      spelling of pronunciation -_-

    • @cosmicraysshotsintothelight
      @cosmicraysshotsintothelight 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It was also spelled wrong. Someone let their auto-correct turn it into a wooden ship part. for the sound... Now say it with me... Johann Sebastian Bach.
      Now I am bach into perspective.

    • @debabratabhattacharya6069
      @debabratabhattacharya6069 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's a video related to physics not english language, so who cares.

  • @andrewrussack8647
    @andrewrussack8647 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Planck was a German speaker. h = Hilfe!

  • @professorboltzmann5709
    @professorboltzmann5709 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    blackbody radiation was the central idea and enigma that led to this discovery. Also, Planck used the ideas earlier developed by the likes of Boltzmann, Maxwell, Rayleigh, Wien, and Stefan.

  • @chap666ish
    @chap666ish 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    That video literally explained nothing 😞

    • @cosmicraysshotsintothelight
      @cosmicraysshotsintothelight 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It explained what it states in the title. That is all. You expected an actual video about the constant itself to be that short? All this did was describe how he got into the work that resulted in the constant, just like the title declares.

  • @nitd955
    @nitd955 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In 1905 a Zurich physicist 😂😂
    What a veiled way to introduced synonym of genius 👍

  • @maskedmarvyl4774
    @maskedmarvyl4774 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Thanks for making a video about Planck's constant while not explaining what it is or how it works.
    Nice silent acting though.

    • @eastport839
      @eastport839 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I learned what it is.

    • @fatimalearns9618
      @fatimalearns9618 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It is the relationship between energy of a photon and its frequency

    • @maskedmarvyl4774
      @maskedmarvyl4774 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@eastport839 , Good for you, ma'am!
      Have a cookie!
      It's made from fresh Higgs Bosons....

    • @maskedmarvyl4774
      @maskedmarvyl4774 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fatimalearns9618 Thanks. You just explained more about this subject than the video did.....

    • @fatimalearns9618
      @fatimalearns9618 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@maskedmarvyl4774 My pleasure 🥰

  • @anupkushwaha7077
    @anupkushwaha7077 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank u sir

  • @pschroeter1
    @pschroeter1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It really brings the subject alive to see two men dressed in period clothes using what I assume is a model of the apparatus used to discover what was mention in a couple paragraphs of my general physics book. The origin of h for Plank's constant is hilarious.

  • @Forever._.curious..
    @Forever._.curious.. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Was all inspiring

  • @shouryagupta7785
    @shouryagupta7785 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Which show is this?

  • @jadghanayem2404
    @jadghanayem2404 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    what show is this clip from?

  • @dallasrieck7753
    @dallasrieck7753 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    we are ALL"researchers"; so say a person or Max Plank was doing research...

  • @tamuajay7858
    @tamuajay7858 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Voi la!! There's the inception of Quantum mechanics.....

  • @debabratabhattacharya6069
    @debabratabhattacharya6069 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice video, could anyone tell me the name of the background music.

  • @stevensprouse2449
    @stevensprouse2449 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much. Did Plank assign his constant the value of roughly 10E-34?

  • @parameshwarhazra2725
    @parameshwarhazra2725 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I was expecting Einstein's cameo...

    • @JL-fh4qw
      @JL-fh4qw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Einstein is overrated. His photoelectric effect is nothing more than using Planck's idea of energy quantization. He also gets way too much credit when he did not even set up the experiment himself but only interpreted the result.

  • @TheDavidlloydjones
    @TheDavidlloydjones 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Spoiler Alert: this video contains no reference to Planck's Constant, only vague handwaving in the direction of the origin of the quantum mechanics of light. A shoddy piece of work overall.
    Add in the misspellings and mispronunciations and it surely ought to be taken down and redone.

  • @touristguy87
    @touristguy87 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    ...ths real issue here is that the assumption that a black body spectrum is made up of a continuous range of light frequencies is just plain wrong. But the assumption of a range of discrete frequencies doesn't make a big difference. The total output energy is still the integral of all the energies of all the frequencies in the output spectrum. You would just need enough frequencies for the output energy to be effectively infinite. Much as lightspeed isn't infinite but over a suitable reference of space-time it is effectively infinite. If you are operating on a reference frame where light takes a detectable amout of time to cross then you have much bigger problems. So the issue really is to sustain such a reference-frame.

  • @kamele.belkacem4514
    @kamele.belkacem4514 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    And me struggling with javascript right now

  • @nilavtalukdar4426
    @nilavtalukdar4426 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    6.626x10^-34

  • @Chad-Giga.
    @Chad-Giga. 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Energy is quantised!

  • @brucewilliams6292
    @brucewilliams6292 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very well done video. I love seeing science taught from a historical perspective.

  • @ancient9182
    @ancient9182 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    After failing in physics exam!

  • @NupeWoop
    @NupeWoop 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The thermal radiator is the cathode tube correct?

  • @oldtvnut
    @oldtvnut 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The narration talks about a device that produces heat from light and then shows apparatus that produces light from heat?

  • @Yoyomama6256
    @Yoyomama6256 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I should have you as physic teacher…

  • @professorboltzmann5709
    @professorboltzmann5709 ปีที่แล้ว

    What documentary is this from?

  • @GeneralNdembo-rf9mp
    @GeneralNdembo-rf9mp 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Always planks constant related to Einstein relativity theory

  • @briankleinschmidt3664
    @briankleinschmidt3664 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The origin of Planks constant? Turns out it was this fellar named Bob Plank. . .

  • @nepgaming7338
    @nepgaming7338 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Jarvis?

  • @biswaborkakoty
    @biswaborkakoty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Max Plank yes but not Einstein... most of the theories and equations of Einstein's including E=mc^2 are copied from others...

    • @bullpuppy7455
      @bullpuppy7455 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      All new ideas are the union of two or more similar or competing ideas, transforming multiple specific concepts into a more generalized whole.
      To think of any lone scientist as being the sole-contributor of any discovery, is just plain silly my friend:)

  • @mahnoorkhan4044
    @mahnoorkhan4044 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Series name plz

  • @SuperlativeCG
    @SuperlativeCG 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Einstein finally developed a theory about space, and it was about time too!

  • @a.hardin620
    @a.hardin620 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The screenshot makes him look like a Disney villain.

  • @jmmahony
    @jmmahony 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    0:30 I think that should have been "light from heat", not "heat from light".

  • @Redant1Redant
    @Redant1Redant 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this does not explain Planks Constant...or its assumptions

    • @cosmicraysshotsintothelight
      @cosmicraysshotsintothelight 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Look at the title. It explains the origins of it, just as the title states. Explanation of the constant itself is a much much deeper subject than a quick video could cover even a small QUANTity of.

  • @TheDavidlloydjones
    @TheDavidlloydjones 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    There was no keer-shoff involved. The German Kirchhoff has two H's in his name. They belong to two different syllables, the kirch one, which ends in a guttural, often written KH, and the second one, hoff, which starts with a perfectly normal hoh sound: keerkh hoff.. No ch as in church, no sh as in ship. Guttural kh, straightforward h.
    Dunno who this Kirshoff fella, at 0:38 might have been.
    And Max Planck (sic) had a much softwer A than any english piece of wood.

  • @michaelgonzalez9058
    @michaelgonzalez9058 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's the power

  • @lifeonmars4088
    @lifeonmars4088 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the pen actor was using in the video?

  • @ganeshchandrajan9899
    @ganeshchandrajan9899 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Hlw brothers !!!
    I have 56.8% MSc.
    And gate score 372 or rank 2455
    Please suggest me anything.
    Kuch samajh nhi aa rha

    • @Seerat.Bashir
      @Seerat.Bashir 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh wow...some tips to qualify gate?

    • @ganeshchandrajan9899
      @ganeshchandrajan9899 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Seerat.Bashir are bas pichle kuch saalo k questions papers solve kar k gya tha

    • @aakanchaanand2223
      @aakanchaanand2223 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Try PhD in abroad as well as in IITs , NITs or go for MS if you have an engineering stream.

    • @ganeshchandrajan9899
      @ganeshchandrajan9899 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aakanchaanand2223 I'm afraid I can't,
      I'm a Physics student and on top of that I don't even have 60% in MSc. Besides that I have such an awful rank

    • @aakanchaanand2223
      @aakanchaanand2223 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bank ssc aur PO Karo tab

  • @mintusaren895
    @mintusaren895 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Janina
    Tabe
    Statics and dynamics
    Majhkhane.
    As per computer 0 and 1.

  • @kingsleynkereuwem-mt2kg
    @kingsleynkereuwem-mt2kg 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think i have found an equation that doesn't require the Planck's constant you can check the video i uploaded in my channel.

  • @citizengoodman8023
    @citizengoodman8023 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The music is not only unnecessary, it's an annoying distraction.

  • @primemagi
    @primemagi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You described current imposed belief. My grandfather was working with Max Planck. He was a real scientist. A theoretician who would only publish after experimentally proved the result of his theory. Max Planck experimentally proved black body radiation is emitted in discreet unit (photon). Sangy (Einstein) took his work as he did Olinto De Pretto calories= mv2 and others and presented it as his. So grandfather stopped his work and left Europe because Sangy was signed by Trojan project..
    Full science information in my 1975 Bremen Summerhouse notes or by official request only. Ferydoon Shirazi. MG1

  • @michaelgonzalez9058
    @michaelgonzalez9058 ปีที่แล้ว

    Plank made electrical combustiun appear

  • @pacajalbert9018
    @pacajalbert9018 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Musí sa vo sne napríklad keď chyba most a otvoríte oči 👀 most už je

  • @juleslopez3342
    @juleslopez3342 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ah, so its u

  • @zandor5657
    @zandor5657 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the background music is totally distracting

  • @savyasdwivedi2559
    @savyasdwivedi2559 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For those of you who don't know the value of h
    h =6.626 × 10^-34 J s

    • @cosmicraysshotsintothelight
      @cosmicraysshotsintothelight 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No it isn't. It was finalized in 2017. The exact number is 6.62607015 X 10^-34 J s (from NIST). Unlike pi, the digit count is low, so no need to chop it off and unlike loose calculations like those in say electronics where rounding off is not a problem, here, the exact number is what should always be used since we have it and we know it. That places ANY error occurrences elsewhere in other data elements.

    • @rahuljoshi3338
      @rahuljoshi3338 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cosmicraysshotsintothelight I use 6.6

    • @cosmicraysshotsintothelight
      @cosmicraysshotsintothelight 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rahuljoshi3338 And that throws off your current and downstream calculations.
      Nice attempt at a funny ribbing though. Pretty transparent, since if you are aware of the number and use it in your work, you would not be rounding, much less to that level. You could change your name to RaFool. Then I would have certainly believed you.

    • @rahuljoshi3338
      @rahuljoshi3338 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cosmicraysshotsintothelight i think rounding is what used for approximate results. Either you are pretty cool with head scratching floating point calculations or you are just not exposed to these yet!!!
      And I will continue with 6.6
      - RaFool

    • @cosmicraysshotsintothelight
      @cosmicraysshotsintothelight 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rahuljoshi3338 Your language indicated that you are very young. I was reading the CRC handbook way back in '72, when it was actually used, and that was likely before even your parents were born. Your "learned it at the disco" vernacular gave you away for just what *you* have been thus far exposed to.
      And Oh, looky... no more handbook needed for referencing as I have this sweet supercomputer level, Internet connected smart phone to look things up on and even do SIMPLE, yet precise calculations on. Oh my! What will I become!?
      Einstein said never memorize anything you can look up. I'll extend that to not performing calculations in my head when I have a readily and handily available device for it.
      Starting on Lotus 123 on an 80 x 25 character XT with a 150kb/s Arcnet network card on it back in '86, I think I've got the 'when to round off' thing covered. And with the mantissa available to me for advanced calculations, I think I'll remain as precise as my scratched head allows, and do my rounding on the final product... maybe.

  • @aru3385
    @aru3385 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍👍

  • @abhijitmore3729
    @abhijitmore3729 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did Plank knew that he had just measured the least count of universe!!?

  • @thedoanzone
    @thedoanzone 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this when planking was invented?

  • @pujyaaggarwal
    @pujyaaggarwal ปีที่แล้ว

    theory will only take you so far

  • @davidlanham99
    @davidlanham99 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the point of captions when they are speaking perfect English?

    • @stynershiner1854
      @stynershiner1854 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not everyone's first language is English.

  • @rgaleny
    @rgaleny 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    ARE QUANTA A FUNCTION OF HARMONICS OF A WAVE IN A BOUNDARY CONDITION ?

  • @crazyhq270
    @crazyhq270 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Try to even paint a different picture from the established 'experts' now.

  • @floridian2023
    @floridian2023 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    W.O.W.

  • @jobyjohn7576
    @jobyjohn7576 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🙏🏼👍🏽

  • @cosmicraysshotsintothelight
    @cosmicraysshotsintothelight 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    First off, you need proofreaders at the very least. Your sister or something... anything. You spelled Planck and Planck's wrong both in the graphic box at the vid beginning and in the title. You should be forced to walk the plank for that. :-)
    Then, the number is now finalized and is not that long a number, so you should give the whole thing, not just a 3 digit partial. it is 6.62607015 X 10-34th Js.

  • @mikecr4916
    @mikecr4916 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't see here where anything was 'discovered' nor proven..

  • @gopalsaini7755
    @gopalsaini7755 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can't you make it in hindi

  • @dozenalmath
    @dozenalmath 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Didn't mention Pi, which is an important part of the equation. Gets a thumbs down from me for that reason.

    • @ShaneClough
      @ShaneClough 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Pi actually isn't important in the blackbody radiation law, or even in relating the energy of a photon to it's frequency. Pi only shows up if you want to express the frequency of light as angular frequency, which is the exact same thing with a factor of 2 Pi, or if you express the momentum of a photon in terms of angular momentum with the reduced plancks constant. But it's the exact same thing, just a factor of 2 Pi for mathematical convenience.

    • @dozenalmath
      @dozenalmath 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ShaneClough Thanks for explaining that. I'm interested in how the Planck length is "the smallest unit in the Universe" and have been working on a base twelve version of Pi which reveals the solution to the challenge of rectifying an "infinite Pi" and a "shortest length". Explanation lies in the geometry of the circle from a base twelve perspective.

    • @hOREP245
      @hOREP245 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@dozenalmath Lul, crank complains about not including pi, and then rants about stupid base twelve stuff. Pi doesn't care about what base you are working in, go learn some real mathematics.

    • @dozenalmath
      @dozenalmath 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hOREP245 well alright, a spokesperson for base ten Pi. Welcome to the conversation!

  • @pacajalbert9018
    @pacajalbert9018 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ja som asi v 10 rokov myslel že niečo také to musí existovať cítil som to

  • @prakashjana7394
    @prakashjana7394 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Kal physics me fail ho gye

  • @puppetsock
    @puppetsock 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The man's name is spelled Planck. A plank is a chunk of wood.

  • @fatehyabali
    @fatehyabali 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    🥺

  • @James-bv4nu
    @James-bv4nu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You need to walk the plank if you can't spell Planck.

  • @cosimo7770
    @cosimo7770 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This "explanation" of the origin of Planck's constant is completely wrong. Planck did not believe or state that light (electromagnetic radiation) was quantised. He only assumed that the electrons in the the wall of a heated black-body container, during the actual process of emission, required quantised energy, but that the subsequent radiation of the light continued as waves. He made this ad-hoc physical assumption simply because he had introduced the constant `h` as a mathematical trick "in a last desperate effort" to obtain a radiation spectral formula which fitted the observations by the experimental physicists (not by Planck himself as the video states). Then, in 1905, Einstein criticised Planck for not providing a meaningful physical explanation for the formula. And Einstein proposed his famous theory (which he himself called "revolutionary") that the radiated light always consists of quanta (later called photons), and showed how this led to the correct radiation spectral formula. However, for more than ten years Planck did not accept Einstein's belief and theory that light radiation was quantised. Therefore, Einstein was the first physicist to introduce a quantum theory into physics, first for radiation and later for specific heats and other phenomena, even though Planck had earlier introduced the constant 'h'. Planck himself later explained that he was very conservative by inclination, and that he found it difficult to make truly revolutionary assumptions such as Einstein's, that all matter and radiation is quantum in nature.

    • @zaharianedealcov6370
      @zaharianedealcov6370 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Bullshit ...i dont get all these lies around Plank.
      He was the first one to postulate the quantization of energy ,and did it in an experiment and gave it a mathematical equation. Einstein recieved the Nobel Prize for explaining the photoelectric effect.
      But Plank was the first one to observe ,deduce and describe the first bits of the quantum world

    • @zaharianedealcov6370
      @zaharianedealcov6370 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He recieved his nobel Prize for discovering the energy quanta (and for making the term quamta popular) ,without him Einstein wouldnt have been able to gain his Nobel