*International laws* are very clear on the South China Sea: - parts of it belong to some ASEAN countries, including Philippines 🇵🇭, - the rest of it is the international water, - no part of it belongs to China🇨🇳 or Taiwan🇹🇼.
pabayaan nyo lng ang china basta continue nyo lng unahan parati sa pag challenge sa knila importante na kayo ang nauuna mag radio challenge.....pag pinadala ang mostership nila ipadala natin yung pinaka maliit natin na barko
i remember this one night i was scrolling aimlessly, feeling like i had hit rock bottom. it felt like nothing i wanted was ever going to happen for me. i don’t know why, but i clicked on this link about the book Vibrations of Manifestation by Alex Lane, and something about it drew me in. the more i read, the more i felt like it was written just for me. it’s wild how much a single book can change your perspective.
What basis po? Where is the evidence? Or baka haka haka lang or pamumulitika lang?kung may matibay ka pong evidence pwedi ka po magsampa ng kaso sa DOJ ng Treason, Espionage or conspiracy, democracy po tayo malaya po tayo magsampa ng kaso sa sinumang alam natin na nagkasalang mga publice officials
I pray that we start to think reasonably and not to be emotional. We are wasting people’s time and money. We are again going back to where we were before always moving backwards not forward. Looking for personal gains more than helping the need of all Filipino people. I pray that we will be more discerning more than self serving🙏❤️
Nations facing Chinese incursions on their sovereignty must present a united front. A coordinated response, like deploying its Coast Guard to counter intrusions, is essential to deter further encroachment.
West Philippine Sea dispute is an extension to Taiwan issue. Just imagine when china really owns the West Phillipine Sea, What impact does it hold to Taiwan issue if they can grab that part of the seas? This calls for the united stand of the Phillipine for its soveriegnty. Leaders of this country should be concerned of this. They must unite.
Bumbahin nyo rin nang tubig ang mga insikto baka naman gumagamit pa nang metro ng tubig ang mga barko natin kaya nanghihinayang kayo sa tubig o kaya wala talagang ganon sa mga barko nyo😢
hwag tayong maniwala sa mga pahayag ng china dahil alam naman natin na salungat ang kanilang sinasabi at ginagawa..maging wise tayo mga pinoy..hwag magpalin lang sa dragon.
a while back, i hit a point where i felt like everything was out of my control. i kept wondering why other people seemed to get what they wanted while i was stuck in the same place. then i came across this book called Vibrations of Manifestation by Alex Lane. i wasn’t expecting much, but the way it explains the connection between your energy and the life you create? it blew my mind. it’s not just a book, it’s like a blueprint for turning your life around.
mahalaga dyang ginagawa ng pinas ay continous presence ng ating mga asset with radio challenging sa mga chinese ship,continous fishing ng ating mangingisda sa ating eez na nakaantabay ang ating pcg at bfar,asaran ang ginagawa ng tsina unang maasar talo...
naku wala naman tayong magagawa dyan! wag na sana ninyo inews sayang lang segment mas lalong nagmumukhang duwag at walang alam mga pinoy na mandirigma, pabayaan nyo na! hintay nalang tayo ng awa sa ibang mga bansa kasi yun naman lumalabas mukha tayong kawawa at di kayang ipagtaggol ang teritoryo.
The government of the Philippines should do . Please remove his embassy to the Philippines return to china he is not deserve as an ambassador here please do a necessary action wang is not ambassador he pushing provocation to the PLA?
i used to think manifesting was all about repeating affirmations and hoping for the best. i tried it for months and…nothing. i was so frustrated. then i heard about this book, Vibrations of Manifestation by Alex Lane, and how it breaks down the science and energy behind manifestation. it’s like it flipped a switch in my brain. once i started applying what i learned, things started falling into place like never before. worth checking out if you’re serious about manifesting.
At the 2020 East Asia Summit, China’s foreign minister Wang Yi clearly stated : 1. China remains committed to the UNCLOS treaty. 2. Denied claiming the entirety of waters or seabed within the dashed U-shaped line. 3. Constrained China’s claims to only the maritime features within the dashed U-shaped line and the maritime entitlements of those features under UNCLOS. As a matter of international law, this means that China’s position is aligned with the legal principle of mare liberum (freedom of the high seas) and the conventions laid out in UNCLOS. The claims are not excessive and no different to Taiwan’s claim; however, Western media’s narrative continues to distort and portray China’s claim to be excessive. The UNCLOS treaty is about the maritime entitlements (eg. territorial waters and EEZ) generated by undisputed sovereign territory. The UNCLOS treaty was never meant to be used to resolve disputes over territorial sovereignty. The South China Sea is a dispute about sovereignty. The Philippines cannot construct sovereignty claims from a treaty (UNCLOS) about maritime entitlements generated from disputed territory. The Philippines abused the rights and procedures under UNCLOS in its 2016 PCA arbitration. This delegitimises the treaty and erodes the fundamental principles of international law. International law requires BOTH parties’ consent for arbitration over sovereignty disputes. China is not the first or the only claimant have reclaimed/ built artificial islands. For decades, the Philippines and Vietnam were the most active in building artificial islands in the area, but from 2014 to 2016 China's construction activity outpaced them. The American policy of containment ensured that the spotlight was focussed on China’s island reclamation activities. Vietnam is currently quietly reclaiming/ expanding islands in the Spratlys. Despite sovereignty disputes over maritime features, the freedom of commercial navigation and overflight enjoyed by all states in the South China Sea under international law has never been threatened. The South China Sea currently contains some of the safest and freest sea lanes in the world, with more than 100,000 ships and one third of the world's maritime trade passing through every year. Over 60% of China's foreign trade and energy imports pass through the South China Sea; peace and stability in the South China Sea is as vital to China as any other country. China’s interests lie in ensuring that these sea lanes remain safe and accessible to all. The UK & the US themselves blatantly defied the UN and ICJ rulings that affirm Mauritius’ sovereignty over Diego Garcia (which the UK took by force) for many years; they only recently negotiated a controversial settlement with the Mauritian government that excluded the original islanders right to return home or compensation; the UK and US negotiated another 99 years of occupation of Diego Garcia against the recommendations of the UN and ICJ court. Filipinos should also note the US herself has not ratified the UNCLOS treaty. The body of international law that is used to settle sovereignty disputes is not described or prescribed in the UNCLOS treaty. A fundamental principle governing the international law on sovereignty disputes is that of state consent. Hence, it was beyond the PCA’s jurisdiction to arbitrate on the sovereignty of the Spratlys or define the boundaries of the Philippines’ EEZ. Under customary international law, sovereignty is determined by factors like discovery, historical title, effective occupation, official acts, official documents, international treaties, official maps, acquiescence, abandonment etc. Geographical location and proximity are often not material considerations when deciding sovereignty disputes. There are many examples of islands and territories that fly a distant sovereign flag from its adjacent neighbours. Serranilla Bank and Baja Nuevo Bank are uninhabited high tide features in the Caribbean Sea that is administered by Columbia. The US still maintains claims over these features and considers them territories of the United States. There are many more examples: Phú Qúoc Island, South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, The Falklands, Gibraltar, Greek Islands in the Eastern Mediterranean off the coast of Turkey, Puerto Rico, The US and British Virgin Islands, Pedra Blanca….. etc. The 2008 ICJ case of Pedra Blanca and Middle Rocks illustrates this point. Pedra Branca is a cluster of high tide rocks with a lighthouse built on it; and Middle Rocks are high tide rocks that did not have any man-made structures at the time of litigation. These rocks lie in closer proximity to Malaysia than Singapore; Malaysia even held the historical title to the rocks via the Johor Sultanate. However, after Singapore gained its independence from Malaya in 1965, Singapore continued to occupy, maintain and administer the lighthouse on Pedra Branca for many decades without objection from the Malaysians. Both Singapore and Malaysia consented to submit the sovereignty dispute to the ICJ. The ICJ awarded the sovereignty of Pedra Branca to Singapore while the Middle Rocks were awarded to Malaysia. The legal principles (acquiescence & abandonment) that established the transference of sovereignty/title of Pedra Branca from Malaysia to Singapore had nothing to do with proximity or UNCLOS. A pragmatic solution to South China Sea disputes embraced by several ASEAN members is to shelve their sovereignty disputes (ie agree to disagree) and pursue agreements of cooperation over South China Sea resources through quiet diplomatic negotiations. This approach, initially suggested by Deng Xiao Peng in 1960, has achieved some progress between competing claimant states. This might lead to some agreement like the Svalbard Treaty for the Spratlys. An ASEAN-flavoured analogy to explain the SCS dispute: 2 neighbours with mango trees are arguing about a fallen mango on the ground. They cannot prove which tree the mango fell from. Consider the 3 scenarios below: 1. The neighbours fight, accidentally smash the mango and no one gets to taste it; 2. The neighbours stop arguing and sit down to share the mango in peace; 3. One neighbour decides to ask the village crime boss for help. The crime boss’ thugs take the mango forcibly from the other neighbour. However, the crime boss likes the mango so much he decides to keep the mango, collect protection money and tax all future mango harvests from both trees for himself.
Ano yan helikopter walang armas at takot din kayo magpaputok kahit warning shot lang di magdala kayo ng pana . hahahaha lagi nalang ganoon dba kayo nagsawa.....
Chinese Embassy in Philippines does not contribute anything to peace and security, why should we let them stay for a longer time
eject the amb outright
Because Filipinos need to go there to apply for a visa to work as domestic servants in China
Chinese Embassy in the Philippines probably is full of spies disguised as diplomats and clerical staff...
We Christians praying always for a Divine protection for our beloved country Philippines 🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🙏🙏🙏☝️☝️☝️💯%
*International laws* are very clear on the South China Sea:
- parts of it belong to some ASEAN countries, including Philippines 🇵🇭,
- the rest of it is the international water,
- no part of it belongs to China🇨🇳 or Taiwan🇹🇼.
The problem is China don't respect sea of law,They want to grab all the islands in SCS.
Ipadala jan ung mga DDS tutal kasalanan nila yan. 😢
Bigyan mo cla ng barko.
Ikaw ipadala Kasi madaldal ka. Mga addict at magnanakaw at NPA ayaw sa mga Duterte. Saan ka ba diyan
Kasalanan ng mga NPA at addict yan😂😂
What an idiotic comment
@@dwynnemini3729
MGA NPA KAIBIGAN NG SINASAMVA MO DIGONYO ASO NG KOMUNISTANG CHINA
China 🇨🇳 denies cyberattacks on the Philippines
is like the Sinaloa cartel denying about drug trafficking. LOL
i proseso na ang impeachment proceedings …
When they deployed a military helicopter they should have sent out our military as well. Sabayan ninyo para malaman nila na they are crossing the line
teka teka attitude
BBM recently signed into law the Maritime Zones and the Archipelagic Sea Lanes bills. Time to apply them.
The question is how?
Duterte did an irreversible damage, because he normalized CCP to feel at ease.
It is a piece of paper and has no power to stop Chinese aggressive action
How？ Without any milittary strength，those laws are euquivalent to toilet papers.
@@RichMidasPapa You got a point.
pabayaan nyo lng ang china basta continue nyo lng unahan parati sa pag challenge sa knila importante na kayo ang nauuna mag radio challenge.....pag pinadala ang mostership nila ipadala natin yung pinaka maliit natin na barko
i remember this one night i was scrolling aimlessly, feeling like i had hit rock bottom. it felt like nothing i wanted was ever going to happen for me. i don’t know why, but i clicked on this link about the book Vibrations of Manifestation by Alex Lane, and something about it drew me in. the more i read, the more i felt like it was written just for me. it’s wild how much a single book can change your perspective.
CN knows that their puppet dmonio is being kicked out of power
What basis po? Where is the evidence? Or baka haka haka lang or pamumulitika lang?kung may matibay ka pong evidence pwedi ka po magsampa ng kaso sa DOJ ng Treason, Espionage or conspiracy, democracy po tayo malaya po tayo magsampa ng kaso sa sinumang alam natin na nagkasalang mga publice officials
loko loko kayong mga NPA..sus kawawa talaga ?
I pray that we start to think reasonably and not to be emotional. We are wasting people’s time and money. We are again going back to where we were before always moving backwards not forward. Looking for personal gains more than helping the need of all Filipino people. I pray that we will be more discerning more than self serving🙏❤️
Nations facing Chinese incursions on their sovereignty must present a united front. A coordinated response, like deploying its Coast Guard to counter intrusions, is essential to deter further encroachment.
why do you call it monster ship? … it is just a ship … those manning that ship probably are “monsters” …
West Philippine Sea dispute is an extension to Taiwan issue. Just imagine when china really owns the West Phillipine Sea, What impact does it hold to Taiwan issue if they can grab that part of the seas?
This calls for the united stand of the Phillipine for its soveriegnty. Leaders of this country should be concerned of this. They must unite.
Bumbahin nyo rin nang tubig ang mga insikto baka naman gumagamit pa nang metro ng tubig ang mga barko natin kaya nanghihinayang kayo sa tubig o kaya wala talagang ganon sa mga barko nyo😢
hwag tayong maniwala sa mga pahayag ng china dahil alam naman natin na salungat ang kanilang sinasabi at ginagawa..maging wise tayo mga pinoy..hwag magpalin lang sa dragon.
a while back, i hit a point where i felt like everything was out of my control. i kept wondering why other people seemed to get what they wanted while i was stuck in the same place. then i came across this book called Vibrations of Manifestation by Alex Lane. i wasn’t expecting much, but the way it explains the connection between your energy and the life you create? it blew my mind. it’s not just a book, it’s like a blueprint for turning your life around.
Escalate tensions, again? or still?
Its hard to call yourselves a man when you have no bawls.
TGL NMN NG IMPEACHMENT
DAPT N KC TLGA ASK NG US ASSISTANCE WAG N MG ANTAY N MAY MSKTAN P SA ATING MGA UNIFORM MEN
NO TO IMPEACHMENT
YES to corruption and theivery.
mahalaga dyang ginagawa ng pinas ay continous presence ng ating mga asset with radio challenging sa mga chinese ship,continous fishing ng ating mangingisda sa ating eez na nakaantabay ang ating pcg at bfar,asaran ang ginagawa ng tsina unang maasar talo...
naku wala naman tayong magagawa dyan! wag na sana ninyo inews sayang lang segment mas lalong nagmumukhang duwag at walang alam mga pinoy na mandirigma, pabayaan nyo na! hintay nalang tayo ng awa sa ibang mga bansa kasi yun naman lumalabas mukha tayong kawawa at di kayang ipagtaggol ang teritoryo.
baka mas mauna pa tayong masakop kesa Taiwan 😅
The government of the Philippines should do . Please remove his embassy to the Philippines return to china he is not deserve as an ambassador here please do a necessary action wang is not ambassador he pushing provocation to the PLA?
nakakaawa si tarilla. ayaw nyan man. yong lang pwede nyang masabi. sumasakit na panga nya sa paulit ulit
Vp is hope of this country.
Nasaan na ang budget dyan???
Nasa bulsa pa ng goberno ni BBM
Pahagingan nyo n kc ng missile, kht sampol lang..😅
Akap kurakot kurakot
Puro lang kayo salita kulang sa action,
i used to think manifesting was all about repeating affirmations and hoping for the best. i tried it for months and…nothing. i was so frustrated. then i heard about this book, Vibrations of Manifestation by Alex Lane, and how it breaks down the science and energy behind manifestation. it’s like it flipped a switch in my brain. once i started applying what i learned, things started falling into place like never before. worth checking out if you’re serious about manifesting.
Pcg has no egg to fight😅😅😅
At the 2020 East Asia Summit, China’s foreign minister Wang Yi clearly stated :
1. China remains committed to the UNCLOS treaty.
2. Denied claiming the entirety of waters or seabed within the dashed U-shaped line.
3. Constrained China’s claims to only the maritime features within the dashed U-shaped line and the maritime entitlements of those features under UNCLOS.
As a matter of international law, this means that China’s position is aligned with the legal principle of mare liberum (freedom of the high seas) and the conventions laid out in UNCLOS. The claims are not excessive and no different to Taiwan’s claim; however, Western media’s narrative continues to distort and portray China’s claim to be excessive.
The UNCLOS treaty is about the maritime entitlements (eg. territorial waters and EEZ) generated by undisputed sovereign territory. The UNCLOS treaty was never meant to be used to resolve disputes over territorial sovereignty. The South China Sea is a dispute about sovereignty.
The Philippines cannot construct sovereignty claims from a treaty (UNCLOS) about maritime entitlements generated from disputed territory. The Philippines abused the rights and procedures under UNCLOS in its 2016 PCA arbitration. This delegitimises the treaty and erodes the fundamental principles of international law. International law requires BOTH parties’ consent for arbitration over sovereignty disputes.
China is not the first or the only claimant have reclaimed/ built artificial islands. For decades, the Philippines and Vietnam were the most active in building artificial islands in the area, but from 2014 to 2016 China's construction activity outpaced them. The American policy of containment ensured that the spotlight was focussed on China’s island reclamation activities. Vietnam is currently quietly reclaiming/ expanding islands in the Spratlys.
Despite sovereignty disputes over maritime features, the freedom of commercial navigation and overflight enjoyed by all states in the South China Sea under international law has never been threatened. The South China Sea currently contains some of the safest and freest sea lanes in the world, with more than 100,000 ships and one third of the world's maritime trade passing through every year. Over 60% of China's foreign trade and energy imports pass through the South China Sea; peace and stability in the South China Sea is as vital to China as any other country. China’s interests lie in ensuring that these sea lanes remain safe and accessible to all.
The UK & the US themselves blatantly defied the UN and ICJ rulings that affirm Mauritius’ sovereignty over Diego Garcia (which the UK took by force) for many years; they only recently negotiated a controversial settlement with the Mauritian government that excluded the original islanders right to return home or compensation; the UK and US negotiated another 99 years of occupation of Diego Garcia against the recommendations of the UN and ICJ court. Filipinos should also note the US herself has not ratified the UNCLOS treaty.
The body of international law that is used to settle sovereignty disputes is not described or prescribed in the UNCLOS treaty. A fundamental principle governing the international law on sovereignty disputes is that of state consent. Hence, it was beyond the PCA’s jurisdiction to arbitrate on the sovereignty of the Spratlys or define the boundaries of the Philippines’ EEZ.
Under customary international law, sovereignty is determined by factors like discovery, historical title, effective occupation, official acts, official documents, international treaties, official maps, acquiescence, abandonment etc.
Geographical location and proximity are often not material considerations when deciding sovereignty disputes. There are many examples of islands and territories that fly a distant sovereign flag from its adjacent neighbours. Serranilla Bank and Baja Nuevo Bank are uninhabited high tide features in the Caribbean Sea that is administered by Columbia. The US still maintains claims over these features and considers them territories of the United States. There are many more examples: Phú Qúoc Island, South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, The Falklands, Gibraltar, Greek Islands in the Eastern Mediterranean off the coast of Turkey, Puerto Rico, The US and British Virgin Islands, Pedra Blanca….. etc.
The 2008 ICJ case of Pedra Blanca and Middle Rocks illustrates this point. Pedra Branca is a cluster of high tide rocks with a lighthouse built on it; and Middle Rocks are high tide rocks that did not have any man-made structures at the time of litigation. These rocks lie in closer proximity to Malaysia than Singapore; Malaysia even held the historical title to the rocks via the Johor Sultanate. However, after Singapore gained its independence from Malaya in 1965, Singapore continued to occupy, maintain and administer the lighthouse on Pedra Branca for many decades without objection from the Malaysians. Both Singapore and Malaysia consented to submit the sovereignty dispute to the ICJ. The ICJ awarded the sovereignty of Pedra Branca to Singapore while the Middle Rocks were awarded to Malaysia. The legal principles (acquiescence & abandonment) that established the transference of sovereignty/title of Pedra Branca from Malaysia to Singapore had nothing to do with proximity or UNCLOS.
A pragmatic solution to South China Sea disputes embraced by several ASEAN members is to shelve their sovereignty disputes (ie agree to disagree) and pursue agreements of cooperation over South China Sea resources through quiet diplomatic negotiations. This approach, initially suggested by Deng Xiao Peng in 1960, has achieved some progress between competing claimant states. This might lead to some agreement like the Svalbard Treaty for the Spratlys.
An ASEAN-flavoured analogy to explain the SCS dispute:
2 neighbours with mango trees are arguing about a fallen mango on the ground. They cannot prove which tree the mango fell from. Consider the 3 scenarios below:
1. The neighbours fight, accidentally smash the mango and no one gets to taste it;
2. The neighbours stop arguing and sit down to share the mango in peace;
3. One neighbour decides to ask the village crime boss for help. The crime boss’ thugs take the mango forcibly from the other neighbour. However, the crime boss likes the mango so much he decides to keep the mango, collect protection money and tax all future mango harvests from both trees for himself.
Then, act nothing
Patulong na kasi kayo sa US.
matutong tumayo sa sariling paa … di naman po pilay o lumpo …
@@charliemonterojr𝙥𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙥𝙞𝙣𝙤 𝙢𝙖𝙝𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙜 𝙝𝙪𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙞 𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙪𝙡𝙤𝙣𝙜 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙜 𝙖𝙮𝙪𝙙𝙖 𝙢𝙖𝙝𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙜 𝙨𝙖 𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙞 𝙖𝙮𝙖𝙬 𝙩𝙪𝙢𝙖𝙮𝙤 𝙨𝙖 𝙨𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙥𝙖𝙖
@charliemonterojr di pa nga kaya eh, maliban sa sobrang takot, ay kulang din sa mga barko, eroplano, at missile system.
Kayo kawawa Hindi c vp
Si vp ipadala sa WPS 😂
Mag focus lang sa pag alis sa mga Chinese Business dito sa Pilipinas gaya ng Chairman sa Kuryente.
lessen buying made in china
pa tawa tawa lang manga opisyal ah
Ano yan helikopter walang armas at takot din kayo magpaputok kahit warning shot lang di magdala kayo ng pana . hahahaha lagi nalang ganoon dba kayo nagsawa.....