An 80,000 year old organism that uses clones to live forever and has a heart too far underground to be killed by conventional means. I'm sure it means us no harm, so long as we remember to feed the shoggoth.
Last year I found one of the oldest verified bristlecone pine trees. Though only 2,515~ years old it was still the oldest of its particular species of bristlecone. It was life changing in a weird way to touch something that's been alive since before Alexander the Great existed.
My grandfather as a member of the Sierra Club in the 60’s, 70’s took my brother and I on many trips to Yosemite and the Methuselah Walk among other places. He said he knew where the oldest tree in the world was and that it was a Bristlecone Pine, but he couldn’t tell us which one it was. We respected his wishes and enjoyed the 5 mile trek, nevertheless. RIP Grandpa Woody!
Old Tjikko is a clonal tree. The trunk is only a few hundred years old, but the root system has been continuous for over 9000 years. So we lumped this in with the clonal systems, of which Pando is the oldest known. But life is weird and hard to categorize, you could make the case that Pando is the oldest living single tree because it's a clonal individual, not a clonal colony.
I love how fast he and John talk! It's great because I usually can't watch videos for too long because I get impatient with how long the people are taking to just spit it out lmao. Also I now wonder how many other tree networks like Pando there are...
That's a good idea...I've had that one kickin' around in my head for a while. I think it's more a series than a single video though. Keep your eye out for it!
From Ancient Sea Life to the egg laying mammals and Koalas of my home, nature is beautiful and is as strange and amazing today as it was when it first started. :)
Volvirth The Catholic Church inducted Pando into sain-hood today, for proving to have more self restraint than all its ministers, combined, in it's entire history.
We probably should have included Old Tjikko, but we sorta lumped it in with the clonal colonies (some of which are much older) because it is a clonal tree...it's trunk is only a few hundred years old, but it's root system is far older. When trees fall, often their root systems will continue to survive and sprout new trunks. Old Tjikko is different from Pando in that it is a single trunk-and-root system that has persisted for many thousands of years, making it considerably more fragile
Nope, quite the contrary. The fact that it's 80K yrs. old means it hasn't evolved since then. Sentience is the product of evolution. I'd rather put my money on some sort of parasitic plant "hijacking" an organism with a synaptic system to be the first "sentient" plant. (Edit) In that case, it would no longer be a plant, but a hybrid :)
After watching this episode I have been convinced that the name "Pandora" was not just a chosen randomly in that movie. It could have been set on any other planet or moon but they chose Pandora.
Weather your'e a genius or just a great researcher, I always totally enjoy the facts and illustrations you put out. I hope you never loose your curiosity because often times you give answers to questions people haven't thought about. GOD BLESS YOU & your curiosity!
Alive for 80,000 years is simply amazing. It seems remarkably considering the 10k years sans romance. Isn't reproduction the ultimate goal of all living species? In any event, it must have an awesome retirement plan.
No, the goal is to not die, most creatures get around this by passing on their genes to their offspring but simply not dying yourself is also a valid strategy
It kinda depends on the organism. Like, a fly for example: its most likely primary goal of life is to reproduce before it dies. but a tree is more likely to want to survive _and_ reproduce/pass their genes. But if you really want a scientific answer you probably shouldn't be asking a TH-cam comment section.
Organisms die because dna gets damaged over time which endangers growth and healing so organisms reproduce and grow again with fresh supply of genetic material. Trees are very simple and protected from elements so they can afford to grow and live untill circumstances dont allow them to do.
As a stand alone individual tree non clone,there is a 10,500 year old Huon Pine in Tasmania. At my old primary school here in Armadale,Western Australia we had the oldest remaining Jarrah tree in the metropolitan area,dated at 1600 years old according to the plaque on it from 1966. It's surrounded by a shopping centre car park now but still living.
Mark, I wonder if it's possible to detach a portion of the Pando root system and get it to grow independently, perhaps in an even more ideal environment for it to flourish. What do you think?
+Theface ofawsomeness for some reason i didnt like the legend of korra as much as avatar but thanks for reminding me of that show. Im gonna watch the series again and see if i like it :)
Theface ofawsomeness IK i watched two episodes already. its the ones where it shows the first avatar, those two were EPIC.What if since the light spirit bonded with the avatar wouldn't it be crazy if there was also a dark avatar equivalent?
@cupheadfangamer8481 so you are saying that you are not alive. The root system of the tree works like a regeneration process ,if a tree connected to the root dies then another tree grows from the root. It is kinda like cutting and then regrowing your hands and as time passes the whole body changes but it is still you. I guess you agree with me that it is still you whether it's 7 years ago or now (after 7 years every single atom in an average human body replaces.)
Maybe they used underground scanning techniques to determine the size of the heart of the whole colony of trees and cross referenced it with smaller specimens growth rates and deduced that it would take 80,000 years for organisms of this type to get that large.
Well, you could do some research of your own and disprove the video. Or just go here: news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/04/080414-oldest-tree.html Sweden has some trees likely to be older than the Bristlecone mentioned first in the video.
Well, I mean. North America is a hell of a good place for trees. Not only the oldest, but the tallest tree and the biggest trees in the world live there.
Can a black hole exist in a black a hole? If it is possible, do they cancel each other out and can you call them black holes? I am Belgian, so sorry for my bad english.
Just a guess, but I would think that the black holes would converge and grow into a more massive black hole. At the same time, as all that super-dense matter collided and pressed into a singularity, I would think there would be a massive energy release.... except that the newly formed, massive, singularity may stop all that energy from escaping.... unless the energy released was greater than the force of the gravity generated by the singularity. Like I said I'm not an astrophysicist and I'm only guessing, but I'd love to see what an astrophysicist would have to say about this. There are too many guesses involved with black holes, since we can't see them.
I see you have been misled by the poor naming of such objects. Black holes are not actual holes, they just seem that way. Imagine a sun burning so bright, it would go out of our visual spectrum, hence you can't see it. That's a black hole. End of story. Also, you're equating "black", from black hole, to absence of energy/heat. Quite the contrary. The energy/heat there is so intense, that our sun-scale visual receivers (eyes) can't see that high.
+Jeffrey314159 Also Utah was far enough south that it wasn't covered in ice back then. So for Pando, the last ice age was just colder winters, colder summers, less rain, and more snow.
I'm quite certain that you're just trolling, but I'll bite. There's a concept of BC and AD. BC means "before Christ" and AD mean Anno Domini, which is Latin for "in the year of our Lord (Jesus Christ)". This system is what they based their year "numbering convention" from, which became standard all the way to modern times. Think of it as a "number line", counting from positive numbers to negative numbers (sans the negative symbol). For example, if we count in centuries, from 500 AD to 500 BC, it would look something like this: AD 500, AD 400, AD 300, AD 200, AD 100, 100 BC, 200 BC, 300 BC, 400 BC, & 500 BC. Traditionally, the convention for AD years, you put the AD before the year, but you can also write/say 500 AD, etc. So, by saying the world is only 2014 years old, you basically just counted the AD years, and not the BC years. They also changed the BC and the AD, to be more religion-neutral - we have CE (Common/Current Era) and BCE (Before Common/Current Era) now. CE replaced AD and BCE replaced BC. So there you go.
Even if you cut ALL of the trees visible above ground, you still won't exactly be able to kill it because they all grow from a single root system. They will eventually grow back unless you destroy the roots that's probably thousands or more feet below. Goodluck
Circular reasoning, like Darwin championed: common traits indicate common ancestry vs. logic, which is the cornerstone of the 'scientific method.' Testability and observation. For example, 99% of a creature is in its soft tissues; these are lost over time and only the bones > fossils remain. The 1% is open to interpretation. If one has an assumption such as 'deep time' (lawyer Lyell, whose 'Principles of Geology' were assumptions without E and O (experiments and observation) circular reasoning will create a mind picture of 'what was in the past' but which can't be proven by E and O. * Thousands of years is within the biblical time frame, but not millions of years. If the Flood was only a few thousand years ago, this is within the time frame of the oldest trees; millions of years do not parallel the 'deep time' hypothesis.* Check out Dr. Edmund Schulman, for some insight when he applied empirical science (not assumptions / scenario creating / sci fi)... for eg., on giant sequoias: "Does this mean that shortly preceding 3275 years ago all the then living GS were wiped out by some catastrophe?* Note than even secular geologists are accepting the possibility of catastrophism for shaping the Earth's face, not long ages. Eg., 70% of rocks on Earth are sedimentary. By definition these are created by water action plus sediments, not deep time. Also fossils are also created by catastrophe: rapid burial. So both fossils and rocks are likely young (this can be E and O). You can test for yourself, throw a dead fish on the beach and bury another in sediment. See Mt. St. Helens for demonstration of what a few decades after catastrophism looks like: an ancient topography. * a brief primer on tree dating 1. trees might grow more than one ring in one year. 2. ring dating must use rigorous, replicable crossdating -- comparative validation with other trees 3. but even CD does not always work; some rings are very faint, and again some trees produce more than one ring a year... 4. different dates for the same tree may sometimes be obtained 5. inconsistent ring growth ... eg., tropical trees may produce multiple rings -- uneven use of carbs. 6. a tree may configure a countable ring in a few weeks (emphasis). On a tangent we note that the human mutations (@100 per generation) weaken each generation, and the total human race life span is only a few thousand years old: genetic entropy / mutational meltdown, etc. Secular scientists have been astounded that the true human common ancestors are mtDNA 'Eve' and Y-chromosome 'Adam' with ages under 5,000 years. Now, even if they are off by a thousand years or so, this is still within the biblical timeline, and not with the 'deep time hypothesis' ... See 1000 Human Genomes Consortium. Further, if this is true (E and O, remember) then humans could not have lived even 50,000 years ago, because we would be extinct ... let alone millions of years ago. As fossils and rocks, the true human age is again within only thousands of years. Hm, biblical timeframe. Further, this is evidence that mutations are a very bad thing, this is why they are called birth defects... another nail in evolution's coffin that mutations are beneficial. Mutations are proven to be detrimental. How can they 'evolve' any species? E and O has shown this across the board to be a false idea.
Cool video, I subbed!!! Would be better if you kept the tempo at the slower pace just minutely slower than what you do when you speed up! So could you or have you done a video on the various clonal trees around the world? And how do they know how old pando is? and how do they know how deep the heart is?...I guess I kind of know how they could locate the heart but I think they are probably just guessing at the age!!!
Hot air rising from the black top of the road and meets with cooler air above. The hot air has a differing density than the cooler air. The difference in densities causes the light the refract or bend as it pass through the area. The density of the air is not homogeneous and so, like with the air above a fire, there is a distortion or waves in the refracted light image.
I've never seen the video you're talking about, but here Hank says forest fires have killed off previous generations, leaving the root system to produce more trees afterwards. So I don't think there would be any original trees left.
Yes the dendro comes from the greek word dendron, which means tree, specifically fruit tree, as opposed to timber (which is hyle in greek). The chronology comes from the latinised version of the word khronos, which means a defined time or a season As you said the dark rings are made in winter, and the thicker lighter rings in the summer. They're really xylem vessels that carry water through the tree and they only show up because of the different rates of growth through the year Hope this helps:)
As someone who just bought a bottle of "ancient trees" Greek olive oil, I'd much enjoy a video about old (but not OLDEST) trees. Stupendous oil BTW, though the claim of 3-4kyr old trees is doubtless exaggerated.
Okay, I am not sure if I got this down, but wouldn't "Old Tjikko" which is an individual living tree of age 9,550 years be older than the one mentioned in the video? Pretty cool since it's lies in Sweden which were under thick ice during the ice age, 11000 years ago. Edit: Okay, so Old Tjikko is the oldest clonal colony individual tree clone thingy.
Awesome as always! I know this hasn't much to do with this video but could you make a video on terraformation? I'm sure many scientists are thinking about it
I am guessing that has some special relevance to time, hence chrono, from chronos. Did you know that the dark, condensed rings are from winter, where growth is slowest in the year, and so has a tight grain. and The light, thicker, more open grain rings are from summer, as the growth rate is fastest?
You're probably one of the smartest people here. It's soo obvious I was trolling everyone, yet people seemed to believe I was serious. I mean really, a person who believes the world is only 2013 years old would not be subscribed to a channel like scishow....people these days have no deductive skills. Oh and not to mention my user name, That's like telling everyone I'm trolling you. lol
How old and large is the root system for the American Chestnut? Even though the mature stems are extinct, the root system still shoots up saplings. To be so resilient, the root system must be ancient! I hope biologists can find a cure or treatment for the blight of the Chinese Chestnut, soon. American Chestnut was a great building material that grew relatively fast and resisted rot. It also grew so large that doors used to be made of single boards. I really think this would make a great episode!
Actually it brought me here i was watching Vsauce 3 : How much can you carry? And in the middle of the video it has link to a video about Pando and from there i came.
I just saw his mold video, and Pando reminds me of a huge colony of mold. All the roots are connected. Maybe the first trees evolved from molds? I'm kidding about the evolution.
Pando is indeed a contender, but there are a few other clonal colonies that aren't trees that also are on the list, there's a ring. Of bushes in the Australian Outback that is the last genetic example of its species, but despite having nothing like the mass of Pando, is thought to have existed for near about as long! For a hedge in the desert that's pretty incredible, I feel.
An 80,000 year old organism that uses clones to live forever and has a heart too far underground to be killed by conventional means. I'm sure it means us no harm, so long as we remember to feed the shoggoth.
I'll get the virgin sacrifices...
When was the last time someone took the shoggoth for a walk? Its getting cranky...
That depends on what you consider a "conventional means". It's fairly easy to kill if you burn it and then use the empty land for something else.
Sanjay the thing cant be burned by forest fire.
A Lonely Person it can sprout again
Last year I found one of the oldest verified bristlecone pine trees. Though only 2,515~ years old it was still the oldest of its particular species of bristlecone. It was life changing in a weird way to touch something that's been alive since before Alexander the Great existed.
This is why I want to find one and just meet the tree
My grandfather as a member of the Sierra Club in the 60’s, 70’s took my brother and I on many trips to Yosemite and the Methuselah Walk among other places. He said he knew where the oldest tree in the world was and that it was a Bristlecone Pine, but he couldn’t tell us which one it was. We respected his wishes and enjoyed the 5 mile trek, nevertheless. RIP Grandpa Woody!
@@antoniomolina3612 I wanna meet the tree too
Pando has a heart hidden beneath the Earth? Sounds like a boss fight to me C:
+Blues BX its not a heart, just basically, one tree?? but like, ye...??
TheEmeraldBlock SHHHH DONT RUIN MY DREAMS QAQ!!!
Blues BX lmao
Contra on NES. Level 7: Alien's Lair. There's the heart!
Well, I'm pretty sure it inspired a Mass Effect boss
Spending 80'000 years only with clones of myself...
sounds like hell.
Facts lol
Phew that would be terrible.
@@kenneith312 you from TED too?
😂
That’s why none of them speak to each other. 😉
"Thats quite a dry spell" Good one hank! That made me lol!!
The way this comment is written really screams “I WAS WRITTEN 6 YEARS AGO”
Old Tjikko is a clonal tree. The trunk is only a few hundred years old, but the root system has been continuous for over 9000 years. So we lumped this in with the clonal systems, of which Pando is the oldest known. But life is weird and hard to categorize, you could make the case that Pando is the oldest living single tree because it's a clonal individual, not a clonal colony.
I love how fast he and John talk! It's great because I usually can't watch videos for too long because I get impatient with how long the people are taking to just spit it out lmao. Also I now wonder how many other tree networks like Pando there are...
That's a good idea...I've had that one kickin' around in my head for a while. I think it's more a series than a single video though. Keep your eye out for it!
I love nature. It never ceases to amaze me.
From Ancient Sea Life to the egg laying mammals and Koalas of my home, nature is beautiful and is as strange and amazing today as it was when it first started. :)
Ramesh
When you think you're suffering from blue-balls, just think about pando.
Volvirth The Catholic Church inducted Pando into sain-hood today, for proving to have more self restraint than all its ministers, combined, in it's entire history.
@@kristofersoultz9105 yo what
i dont get the joke
@@ultrasound914 same
We probably should have included Old Tjikko, but we sorta lumped it in with the clonal colonies (some of which are much older) because it is a clonal tree...it's trunk is only a few hundred years old, but it's root system is far older. When trees fall, often their root systems will continue to survive and sprout new trunks. Old Tjikko is different from Pando in that it is a single trunk-and-root system that has persisted for many thousands of years, making it considerably more fragile
I wonder if Pando was behind Cameron's inspiration of Pandora where trees are connected to each other.
most surely
Also a song of ice and Fire with the weirwoods
That's what I was thinking! It had to have been.
The white tree of Minas-Tirith!
you are my favourite now.
I was going to right that!!!!!
Andres Peralta
Type*
Andres Peralta
and even if... it's write*
Andres Peralta
Or were you going to "write" it? And before you flip out about this just being a comment section and grammar police. Words matter!!
I just realized I've visited both! The view of the Sierra Nevada from the white mountains is the best thing I've seen.
guys please check out my new book. "10,000 Years as a Forest with Blueballs"
Pando, the beginning of sentient plants...
Nope, quite the contrary. The fact that it's 80K yrs. old means it hasn't evolved since then. Sentience is the product of evolution.
I'd rather put my money on some sort of parasitic plant "hijacking" an organism with a synaptic system to be the first "sentient" plant.
(Edit) In that case, it would no longer be a plant, but a hybrid :)
I believe O_O I BELIEVE O_O
The Pando root system is like the whole weird thinking tree thing on Pandora(Avatar) O_o
After watching this episode I have been convinced that the name "Pandora" was not just a chosen randomly in that movie. It could have been set on any other planet or moon but they chose Pandora.
pretty legit
oldest tree? ur grandpas morning "wood"
Lmao
Wow, Pando gets even less action than I do!
Weather your'e a genius or just a great researcher, I always totally enjoy the facts and illustrations you put out. I hope you never loose your curiosity because often times you give answers to questions people haven't thought about. GOD BLESS YOU & your curiosity!
Absolutely fascinating!
Alive for 80,000 years is simply amazing. It seems remarkably considering the 10k years sans romance. Isn't reproduction the ultimate goal of all living species? In any event, it must have an awesome retirement plan.
No, the goal is to not die, most creatures get around this by passing on their genes to their offspring but simply not dying yourself is also a valid strategy
It kinda depends on the organism. Like, a fly for example: its most likely primary goal of life is to reproduce before it dies. but a tree is more likely to want to survive _and_ reproduce/pass their genes. But if you really want a scientific answer you probably shouldn't be asking a TH-cam comment section.
?what language are you trying to speak?????
@Linda ?Sans means without. en.wiktionary.org/wiki/sans I assume thats what you're talking about
Organisms die because dna gets damaged over time which endangers growth and healing so organisms reproduce and grow again with fresh supply of genetic material.
Trees are very simple and protected from elements so they can afford to grow and live untill circumstances dont allow them to do.
As a stand alone individual tree non clone,there is a 10,500 year old Huon Pine in Tasmania. At my old primary school here in Armadale,Western Australia we had the oldest remaining Jarrah tree in the metropolitan area,dated at 1600 years old according to the plaque on it from 1966. It's surrounded by a shopping centre car park now but still living.
the huon pine isnt 10500 years old, thats how old the colony is. the oldest tree there is estimated to be about 2400 years old.
I play too many video games. First thing I thought about when Pando came up was "It's the Thorian!"
Do you think it could have been studied to be used as a weapon against the reapers?
A definitive statement about the age of the pyramids of Ghiza is bold to say the least.
The olive trees in Jerusalem, on the site of the Gethsemane Gardens, are over 1000 years old. Olive trees can keep growing for centuries.
Mark, I wonder if it's possible to detach a portion of the Pando root system and get it to grow independently, perhaps in an even more ideal environment for it to flourish. What do you think?
that we humans should learn, if it ain't broke - don't fix it :~)
Am I the only one who thinks pando is cheating
No
"The heart of Pando, oldest living being in this world, hidden deep underground for 80 millenias"
That could totally be in a Tolkien book!
I saw the Ancient bristlecone forest. Amazing. Very powerful place.
Your words seem to fit your avatar :P
In Sweden theres a spruce nicknamed Old Tjikko which is 9550 years old
*_2:45_**_ - waiting for the memes about this..._*
What about the Eldergleam? It's the oldest living thing in Tamriel, and it doesn't even get a mention? :(
Kezajaws that's a different world than earth XD
Kezajaws This isn't a gaming facts channel.
I was joking +TheStargateNerd :P
Kezajaws Well, your comment didn't suggest that. In fact, the :( enforced that it wasn't.
In which of the provinces is the eldergleam ? Argonia ?
"When ten thousand years old you are, look as good as this tree you will not."
Why has no one commented on this comment!? That's hilarious!!! 🤣🤣🤣
Can we have an episode on just explaining pando and how it works and all the cool things we know about it
Ohhhh I love this little show
0:35 Legend of Korra fans might recognize the tree on the left as the Tree of Time, since the animators based it of that same tree.
+Theface ofawsomeness for some reason i didnt like the legend of korra as much as avatar but thanks for reminding me of that show. Im gonna watch the series again and see if i like it :)
JustJayson ™ It gets a lot better in the last two seasons.
Theface ofawsomeness IK i watched two episodes already. its the ones where it shows the first avatar, those two were EPIC.What if since the light spirit bonded with the avatar wouldn't it be crazy if there was also a dark avatar equivalent?
JustJayson ™ You are clever, that is all
Theface ofawsomeness lol
Well considering my own dry spell I should be the oldest person in the year 2090
It's true! :D
What is true?
@cupheadfangamer8481 so you are saying that you are not alive. The root system of the tree works like a regeneration process ,if a tree connected to the root dies then another tree grows from the root. It is kinda like cutting and then regrowing your hands and as time passes the whole body changes but it is still you. I guess you agree with me that it is still you whether it's 7 years ago or now (after 7 years every single atom in an average human body replaces.)
Poopy soupy
That thing looks magical
first educational channel on youtube?
old tjikko is the oldest tree on earth, 9500 years old. its in dalarna, sweden
Not continuous growth of a single organism...same as Pando.
9550...
80000 is more than 9500.
I get how you date the tree by the cross rings, however you gave no explanation on how the Panda 80,000 is determined, please explain.
Maybe carbon dating? I'm not sure if that works for living organisms.
Maybe they used underground scanning techniques to determine the size of the heart of the whole colony of trees and cross referenced it with smaller specimens growth rates and deduced that it would take 80,000 years for organisms of this type to get that large.
Because it told the native locals... not only has it developed consciousness after 80,000yrs but a wicked sense of humour too!
Firebrand funny :)
The pine looks like the tree of time from korra. Cool.
BenjerminGaye I wonder if they designed the tree of time specifically to look like one of those pines :)
The left one was the inspiration to that tree
Confirmed
Yep, exactly that, very very little of the atmosphere actually gets out to space, but it takes a long time for that to happen
How could you possibly hate anyone? Your icon is adorable :D
What about that tree in Sweden that is around 9000 years old or something lile that ?
If I'm not mistaken it is because 'Old Rasmus' which is about 9500 years old is a clonal colony clone like Pando.
i refuse to believe the two oldest trees in the world are both in america
Well, you could do some research of your own and disprove the video.
Or just go here: news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/04/080414-oldest-tree.html
Sweden has some trees likely to be older than the Bristlecone mentioned first in the video.
Well, I mean. North America is a hell of a good place for trees. Not only the oldest, but the tallest tree and the biggest trees in the world live there.
Yeah.. MURICA!!!!
Azukar he is being sarcastic
Why not? Both American continents were relatively sparsely populated with not a lot of deforestation or industry until the arrival of colonists.
That's quite a dry spell haha
Well said.
thanks for the videos, you've just earned a new suscriber
The oldest tree in the world "wood" have to be the world's "histree" ;)
did you just
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHA
Can a black hole exist in a black a hole? If it is possible, do they cancel each other out and can you call them black holes?
I am Belgian, so sorry for my bad english.
Erm.. your english is fine. also i have no idea about your question
Just a guess, but I would think that the black holes would converge and grow into a more massive black hole. At the same time, as all that super-dense matter collided and pressed into a singularity, I would think there would be a massive energy release.... except that the newly formed, massive, singularity may stop all that energy from escaping.... unless the energy released was greater than the force of the gravity generated by the singularity. Like I said I'm not an astrophysicist and I'm only guessing, but I'd love to see what an astrophysicist would have to say about this. There are too many guesses involved with black holes, since we can't see them.
Your English is just fine! Keep posting interesting questions. Please
I see you have been misled by the poor naming of such objects.
Black holes are not actual holes, they just seem that way.
Imagine a sun burning so bright, it would go out of our visual spectrum, hence you can't see it.
That's a black hole. End of story.
Also, you're equating "black", from black hole, to absence of energy/heat. Quite the contrary. The energy/heat there is so intense, that our sun-scale visual receivers (eyes) can't see that high.
Thank you!
2:45 10,000 years without sex, eh :(....That must suck Pando, I feel your pain.
lol... sounds like you're tryna make a move on the tree dude
Good one, lol. No just feel sorry for it. It's pain is the only thing I want to feel ;). I can relate to its suffering , but it's just not my type!
But you wouldn't deny that at some point in your life a Great Oak gave you wood?
*Nudges with elbow, Eh? Eh?
Mary Jane hahahaha :D
Fun fact,,, there's a tree in Sweden called Tjikko which is over 9500 years old
This forest of Quaking Aspen called 'Pando' is 80,000 years old!? How did it survive the Ice Age?
+Jeffrey314159 Since it's roots are deep down in the ground it should at least be slightly warmer, it might have been enough.
+Jeffrey314159 Also Utah was far enough south that it wasn't covered in ice back then. So for Pando, the last ice age was just colder winters, colder summers, less rain, and more snow.
How can there be trees this old if the world is only 2014 years old? 0.o makes you think
...
Wow I dont know where to begin on this one
I'm quite certain that you're just trolling, but I'll bite.
There's a concept of BC and AD. BC means "before Christ" and AD mean Anno Domini, which is Latin for "in the year of our Lord (Jesus Christ)". This system is what they based their year "numbering convention" from, which became standard all the way to modern times.
Think of it as a "number line", counting from positive numbers to negative numbers (sans the negative symbol). For example, if we count in centuries, from 500 AD to 500 BC, it would look something like this:
AD 500, AD 400, AD 300, AD 200, AD 100, 100 BC, 200 BC, 300 BC, 400 BC, & 500 BC.
Traditionally, the convention for AD years, you put the AD before the year, but you can also write/say 500 AD, etc.
So, by saying the world is only 2014 years old, you basically just counted the AD years, and not the BC years.
They also changed the BC and the AD, to be more religion-neutral - we have CE (Common/Current Era) and BCE (Before Common/Current Era) now. CE replaced AD and BCE replaced BC.
So there you go.
Thank you!
Nice try little buddy.
A land full of thousands of yellow trees and nobody cuts it down? Nigga you lyin'
They cant. IT CLONES
Even if you cut ALL of the trees visible above ground, you still won't exactly be able to kill it because they all grow from a single root system. They will eventually grow back unless you destroy the roots that's probably thousands or more feet below. Goodluck
I KNEW there would be religious zealots here. They must've absolutely lost their shit when he was talking about pando being 80,000 years old!
Seriously. I'm in middle school, I usually can't pay attention to anything, but u made this interesting. U gots a good speaking voice.
LoL for some reason I find people like you really funny xD
Oldest Tree, 80,000 years old.....
Religious Zealot: "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO"
you mean:
NO ! NO GOD PLEASE NO, NO!
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
they try to use age to disprove God's existence. ha. 👀👀
God Exists they try to prove god's existence with nothing. ha.
God Exists
If you're not the dumbest person in the world,I don't who is. Facts don't lie.
***** if only those who say the facts have no agenda. We know they do. New secular order 👀🔱🗽😂
A lifetime in a mans time span is but a wink in Gods time.
And pando time.
lol creationists
There's a prehistoric tree that has existed since the Dinosaurs. Really old as well. Why didn't you include the Something woodii??
That is just awesome.
there's no god....
TrollMaster300 u trolling
How do Christians explain the trees that have been around since before the supposed flood? Lol
They cant so they will just say the science is wrong. They always make up some excuse to justify their brainwashing
Circular reasoning, like Darwin championed: common traits indicate common ancestry vs. logic, which is the cornerstone of the 'scientific method.' Testability and observation. For example, 99% of a creature is in its soft tissues; these are lost over time and only the bones > fossils remain. The 1% is open to interpretation. If one has an assumption such as 'deep time' (lawyer Lyell, whose 'Principles of Geology' were assumptions without E and O (experiments and observation) circular reasoning will create a mind picture of 'what was in the past' but which can't be proven by E and O. * Thousands of years is within the biblical time frame, but not millions of years. If the Flood was only a few thousand years ago, this is within the time frame of the oldest trees; millions of years do not parallel the 'deep time' hypothesis.* Check out Dr. Edmund Schulman, for some insight when he applied empirical science (not assumptions / scenario creating / sci fi)... for eg., on giant sequoias: "Does this mean that shortly preceding 3275 years ago all the then living GS were wiped out by some catastrophe?* Note than even secular geologists are accepting the possibility of catastrophism for shaping the Earth's face, not long ages. Eg., 70% of rocks on Earth are sedimentary. By definition these are created by water action plus sediments, not deep time. Also fossils are also created by catastrophe: rapid burial. So both fossils and rocks are likely young (this can be E and O). You can test for yourself, throw a dead fish on the beach and bury another in sediment. See Mt. St. Helens for demonstration of what a few decades after catastrophism looks like: an ancient topography. * a brief primer on tree dating 1. trees might grow more than one ring in one year. 2. ring dating must use rigorous, replicable crossdating -- comparative validation with other trees 3. but even CD does not always work; some rings are very faint, and again some trees produce more than one ring a year... 4. different dates for the same tree may sometimes be obtained 5. inconsistent ring growth ... eg., tropical trees may produce multiple rings -- uneven use of carbs. 6. a tree may configure a countable ring in a few weeks (emphasis). On a tangent we note that the human mutations (@100 per generation) weaken each generation, and the total human race life span is only a few thousand years old: genetic entropy / mutational meltdown, etc. Secular scientists have been astounded that the true human common ancestors are mtDNA 'Eve' and Y-chromosome 'Adam' with ages under 5,000 years. Now, even if they are off by a thousand years or so, this is still within the biblical timeline, and not with the 'deep time hypothesis' ... See 1000 Human Genomes Consortium. Further, if this is true (E and O, remember) then humans could not have lived even 50,000 years ago, because we would be extinct ... let alone millions of years ago. As fossils and rocks, the true human age is again within only thousands of years. Hm, biblical timeframe. Further, this is evidence that mutations are a very bad thing, this is why they are called birth defects... another nail in evolution's coffin that mutations are beneficial. Mutations are proven to be detrimental. How can they 'evolve' any species? E and O has shown this across the board to be a false idea.
There goes the Christian myth of a 6 thousand year old earth. And Noah's flood. lol
Goog Le no gods name is Jehovah and he is real JW.org
the age of these tree's are mind blowing holy crap
my mind is once again blown.
You should make a video about why some photos/art looks strange when they're mirrored! I've never understood why that happens.
I also once saw a Baobab tree in Tzaneen, South Africa which is told to be over 6000 years old.
Cool video, I subbed!!! Would be better if you kept the tempo at the slower pace just minutely slower than what you do when you speed up! So could you or have you done a video on the various clonal trees around the world? And how do they know how old pando is? and how do they know how deep the heart is?...I guess I kind of know how they could locate the heart but I think they are probably just guessing at the age!!!
Hot air rising from the black top of the road and meets with cooler air above. The hot air has a differing density than the cooler air. The difference in densities causes the light the refract or bend as it pass through the area. The density of the air is not homogeneous and so, like with the air above a fire, there is a distortion or waves in the refracted light image.
I love scishow.. dayum even the most boring things are so interesting here :D thank you Hank :)
All Hale Pando! Also Thank You Scishow for all the wondrous info
When Hank talked about Pando 'dry spell' he had an almost 'Johnny Carson style' expression and tone to his voice.
I've never seen the video you're talking about, but here Hank says forest fires have killed off previous generations, leaving the root system to produce more trees afterwards. So I don't think there would be any original trees left.
Yes the dendro comes from the greek word dendron, which means tree, specifically fruit tree, as opposed to timber (which is hyle in greek). The chronology comes from the latinised version of the word khronos, which means a defined time or a season
As you said the dark rings are made in winter, and the thicker lighter rings in the summer. They're really xylem vessels that carry water through the tree and they only show up because of the different rates of growth through the year
Hope this helps:)
As someone who just bought a bottle of "ancient trees" Greek olive oil, I'd much enjoy a video about old (but not OLDEST) trees. Stupendous oil BTW, though the claim of 3-4kyr old trees is doubtless exaggerated.
There are some wild fig tree(s) which are similar to Pando.
Okay, I am not sure if I got this down, but wouldn't "Old Tjikko" which is an individual living tree of age 9,550 years be older than the one mentioned in the video? Pretty cool since it's lies in Sweden which were under thick ice during the ice age, 11000 years ago.
Edit: Okay, so Old Tjikko is the oldest clonal colony individual tree clone thingy.
Awesome as always!
I know this hasn't much to do with this video but could you make a video on terraformation? I'm sure many scientists are thinking about it
Hell yeah, West Coast America!! I saw the Bristlecone Pines over the summer. Ahhh, they're so cool!
Yeah! please do this
I am guessing that has some special relevance to time, hence chrono, from chronos.
Did you know that the dark, condensed rings are from winter, where growth is slowest in the year, and so has a tight grain.
and
The light, thicker, more open grain rings are from summer, as the growth rate is fastest?
The study of tree rings is called dendrochronology if anyone is interested :)
That's quite interesting! 😍
You're probably one of the smartest people here. It's soo obvious I was trolling everyone, yet people seemed to believe I was serious. I mean really, a person who believes the world is only 2013 years old would not be subscribed to a channel like scishow....people these days have no deductive skills. Oh and not to mention my user name, That's like telling everyone I'm trolling you. lol
I still hit like before the ad can be skipped :)
The fire has started!!
How old and large is the root system for the American Chestnut? Even though the mature stems are extinct, the root system still shoots up saplings. To be so resilient, the root system must be ancient! I hope biologists can find a cure or treatment for the blight of the Chinese Chestnut, soon. American Chestnut was a great building material that grew relatively fast and resisted rot. It also grew so large that doors used to be made of single boards. I really think this would make a great episode!
I saw these pine tress with my Dad and brothers back in 1976
Actually it brought me here i was watching Vsauce 3 : How much can you carry? And in the middle of the video it has link to a video about Pando and from there i came.
I just saw his mold video, and Pando reminds me of a huge colony of mold. All the roots are connected. Maybe the first trees evolved from molds?
I'm kidding about the evolution.
Great vidéo happy you know you stuff
the oldest tree( original) is under Antarctica. its small lives underwater is purple and sometimes is depending upon the tide exposed to land
Pando sound like an SCP
Actually there is an Alerce, type of birch, in Southern Chile which is 5600 YO confirmed known as the Great Granfather or El gran abuelo.
Pando is indeed a contender, but there are a few other clonal colonies that aren't trees that also are on the list, there's a ring. Of bushes in the Australian Outback that is the last genetic example of its species, but despite having nothing like the mass of Pando, is thought to have existed for near about as long! For a hedge in the desert that's pretty incredible, I feel.