California's "Assault Weapon" Ban Overturned!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 226

  • @kendan1839
    @kendan1839 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    It's not just a California issue, if we can overturn the Assault Weapons ban here, it will eliminate it across the entire country. Text, history, and tradition.

    • @Tennesseeroadster222
      @Tennesseeroadster222 ปีที่แล้ว

      True if every circuit would acknowledge it, here in Tenn they have no problems with any weapons. We are Cc state this mostly has to fall for the blue states that want to Outlaw and abolish our 2nd right.

  • @constitutionallyconscious165
    @constitutionallyconscious165 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    Hopefully the Supreme Court can give the 9th circus a whoopin for playing games as political activists instead of judges on behalf of the constitution.

    • @damanyocum149
      @damanyocum149 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I seriously doubt that is possible

    • @texture6
      @texture6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The METHODOLOGY is IGNORANCE is NOT a DEFENSE

    • @damanyocum149
      @damanyocum149 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@texture6 exactly

    • @scottp7587
      @scottp7587 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@damanyocum149 It will happen

    • @damanyocum149
      @damanyocum149 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@scottp7587I seriously doubt it

  • @1coryahicks
    @1coryahicks ปีที่แล้ว +38

    The biggest issue I have with The People's Republic Of California is the legislature can push a law through in a matter of weeks and we have to pay both sides for years to get rid of it.

    • @philipdepalma4672
      @philipdepalma4672 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Legislatures which pass and Governors who sign unconstitutional laws need to be penalized.

    • @1coryahicks
      @1coryahicks ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@philipdepalma4672 and incarcerated

    • @andnorr7738
      @andnorr7738 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's why I would recommend avoid living in the northeast and far west.

    • @scottman6969
      @scottman6969 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@andnorr7738why would we run away like cowards???. Real men stay and fight for their rights.

    • @andnorr7738
      @andnorr7738 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@scottman6969 Then stay and fight for your rights but I'll be enjoying them elsewhere. Honestly I think the northeast and far west are lost causes regarding high taxes and overregulation. High taxes and overregulation may ultimately be the fate of all states, but I intend to enjoy my life for as long as I can :)

  • @rhugh02
    @rhugh02 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Newsom crying like a beach is a real good sign. IMO.

    • @glockster68
      @glockster68 ปีที่แล้ว

      It wont last they will rule against it.....sadly

  • @bernardhernandez2396
    @bernardhernandez2396 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    These tyrannical crooks need to be jailed

  • @joesmith5604
    @joesmith5604 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    How many times do we have to do this? Cause we r way past insanity

    • @1810jeff
      @1810jeff ปีที่แล้ว +4

      This ends when enough people feel that the pain of inaction is more than the pain of action.

    • @MichaelDillin
      @MichaelDillin ปีที่แล้ว

      Over and over again as long as politicians don't uphold the constitution and the people are in support of laws that violate the 2A

  • @codyjenn8785
    @codyjenn8785 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The assault weapon ban being struck down is great news and thank you for the 2a News brother.

  • @susankluss8955
    @susankluss8955 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    ❤❤❤ Kudos to judge Benita's and his assisting clerks or attorneys that helped him our hats go off. To you guys, we thank you so much for all the hard work. And late countless hours you put in. Thank you so much, God bless you all.😊

  • @CF-cx3hg
    @CF-cx3hg ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This all means nothing until it's finalized.

  • @peanut3050
    @peanut3050 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    disband the 9th they know this is wrong!

  • @zantimisfits4021
    @zantimisfits4021 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you for these posts. They are so important on so many levels. Kudos to Joel and everyone who speaks with Joel on these posts, especially Chuck M., Sam P., and Rick T.

  • @americanpatriot2422
    @americanpatriot2422 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Outstanding video and presentation

    • @RASAllusion
      @RASAllusion ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Remember too- the word “Assault” is a Noun and a Verb but but it is not a adjective.
      There literally cant be “an assault rifle”

  • @marcnissen578
    @marcnissen578 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    So I wonder if Illinois watching California and it’s outcome

  • @TheDidjidude
    @TheDidjidude ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The icing on the cake will be challenging the need for a CCW permit.

    • @dragonf1092
      @dragonf1092 ปีที่แล้ว

      The icing would be elimination of all illegal unconstitutional background checks.

  • @francorama
    @francorama ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Why is it so easy for them to pass these unconstitutional laws. Yet they make it so hard to take them off. It sure sounds like a kangaroo court system.

    • @MichaelDillin
      @MichaelDillin ปีที่แล้ว

      Cost lots of money to fight the laws that corrupt inept politicians try to tyrannically force in it's minion's uhm I mean people

  • @jimblack5153
    @jimblack5153 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well done!

  • @TheThinker434
    @TheThinker434 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Brady and Giffords are also doing this.

  • @DouglasCMills
    @DouglasCMills ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Your right! So many times we win, then ………..😮 nothing! Time to load up some more popcorn and watch the rerun!
    Thanks for your show. 🙌🙏❤️

  • @johnvahl762
    @johnvahl762 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The long term problem is that law schools are teaching future lawyers and judges badly. They Progressive movement is in charge of the law school.

  • @RASAllusion
    @RASAllusion ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Caetano - All Bearable Arms Are Protected. It really is that simple.

  • @larrys.3992
    @larrys.3992 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Good job Joel!

  • @brianmitchell8964
    @brianmitchell8964 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Bruen made things worse in NY. The relalitory laws they passed were far worse than what we had before. Multiple suits have been filed but the circuit Court has denied staying the laws using interest balancing in violation of Bruen and the SCOTUS has declined emergency review of every case so far. It makes zero sense for them to have sent the cases that were already before them back down to have to work their way back up. They could have settled the matter narion wide. Instead of stalling. A right delayed is a right denied.

  • @jeffreymorgan4381
    @jeffreymorgan4381 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    For a minute then back to the 9th full panel and then rejected and we start all over again

    • @jimklemens5018
      @jimklemens5018 ปีที่แล้ว

      That can't happen.

    • @jeffreymorgan4381
      @jeffreymorgan4381 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jimklemens5018 why not? They did it with the magazine ban. Is there something I don't know

    • @jimklemens5018
      @jimklemens5018 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jeffreymorgan4381 How would the case get kicked back to Benitez again?

    • @jeffreymorgan4381
      @jeffreymorgan4381 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jimklemens5018 it wouldn't. it would go to 11 panel in the 9th circuit just like the magazine ban.

    • @jimklemens5018
      @jimklemens5018 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jeffreymorgan4381 The Miller case will go to a three judge panel first.

  • @birdsoup777
    @birdsoup777 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for your channel. Appreciate good men like you.

  • @williamclark755
    @williamclark755 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks great information 🦅🇺🇸

  • @JMark-zk5pj
    @JMark-zk5pj ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The only thing that actually changed was the sunset on the AW ban. Nothing else.

  • @jackgreenstalk777
    @jackgreenstalk777 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Bruen case has already made a MAJOR change, every state is now SHALL issue not MAY issue for CCW.. that is a major major change for CA and many other states using may issue to deny people on their whim

  • @kentpublic
    @kentpublic ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you, gentlemen

  • @georgeclontd4984
    @georgeclontd4984 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The SCOTUS has to clean The 9Th Sewer.

  • @StonePillar81
    @StonePillar81 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I’ve asked countless people this question…Will this be making its way to New York? I’m in Ticonderoga (Upstate) and we are being restricted to Death here. Kathy Hochul should be impeached.

    • @ih8suvz
      @ih8suvz ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If this thing is struck down in the 9th circuit court I think this will only apply to states under the 9th circuit jurisdiction. You guys in New York would still be sol.

  • @reevinriggin3570
    @reevinriggin3570 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    As frustrated as I am, I have to stay the course and agree with Mr. Michel and to keep fighting through the courts, and it will ultimately win this for us peacefully. I can kick in another $100 this month to CRPA. Thanks for fighting for us.

    • @MichaelDillin
      @MichaelDillin ปีที่แล้ว

      We need a better system. The current system incentives the gun lobby by getting more money the more 2A challenge laws that are enacted. There is a financial incentive that incentives the lobbyists. It's a mes

  • @texture6
    @texture6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The METHODOLOGY is IGNORANCE is NOT a DEFENSE

  • @RTRider.MaxCaptain
    @RTRider.MaxCaptain ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you so much for the video and update. This is not a sprint, it is a marathon, just like our independence from the crown, and our Bill of Rights was. I am supporting this effort for me, me fellow citizen, and for all our posterity to come.

  • @peanut3050
    @peanut3050 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    OK----ask chuck why his group has never fought for open carry or offered any help to Charles Nichols who has been fighting for Ca open carry since 2012!

    • @1coryahicks
      @1coryahicks ปีที่แล้ว

      I have been wondering about that also. He was the OG constitutional open carry advocate ❤

  • @timelliott6036
    @timelliott6036 ปีที่แล้ว

    Chuck Michel, the 9th District did NOT listen to the SCOTUS, and sent back the same verdict they did before Bruen. I wish Judge Benitez had at least given us another “freedom week.”

  • @REP46520
    @REP46520 ปีที่แล้ว

    will wait another 5 decades before we get and answer by all these courts. I'm 61 yrs of age and it's been like this for the last 40 yrs.

  • @saber0089
    @saber0089 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Question: What could the Bruen case say about the constitutionality of the National Firearms Act?

  • @Reach41
    @Reach41 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This almost certainly will go to the Supreme Court for final resolution, so the question is how long will we have to wait?

  • @alexandervargas5304
    @alexandervargas5304 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does this affect the first roberti-roos law!!!!!!!!!

  • @Bloosee
    @Bloosee ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When the Miller decision came out I yawned and went about my day and didn't give it a second thought. I know I'm still looking at years before my AR's can be normal.

  • @dragonf1092
    @dragonf1092 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anyone doing a background check should be sued and felony charges brought against them in a federal court in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. section 241 conspiracy against rights, Title 18 U.S.C. section 242 deprivation of rights under color of law, Title 5 U.S.C. section 7311 Ex. ORD. No. 10450 subsection (5).

  • @sentraselify
    @sentraselify ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Its a great day when i see a Mr. Persinger upload!

  • @078249
    @078249 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mr. Persinger, as we've seen around the country some judges just defy the supreme court. This happens not only in 2A cases but other cases as well. Unfortunately, the political winds sway some judges. How are these types of judges delt with?
    The 9th does this often without accountability. This is the ongoing problem with cases that never seem to be resolved.
    Can the supreme court disbar a judge in defiance? Pick a topic, there are defying judges out there.

  • @josedelao9925
    @josedelao9925 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The 9th circuit Court a Appeal there not for the people of the 2 Amendment it sad when people don't trust the courts

  • @hvega8199
    @hvega8199 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Man I can’t wait till you put up a video telling us to unCuck out rifles and get all the standard/high capacity magazines we want. We’re free!!!
    One day 🤙🏾.
    Thanks for what you do.

  • @rharrold
    @rharrold ปีที่แล้ว

    I was unsubscribed, apparently by Facebook. I re subscribed this a.m.

  • @marcofguzman3075
    @marcofguzman3075 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Extremely important for everyone in Comifornia that enjoys the second Amendment and would like to the desendants to actually also enjoy our rights 😮

  • @fertilerevitilizer7833
    @fertilerevitilizer7833 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Not really. It's going to get appealed and a stay is going to get placed. It'll be dragged for at least 5 more years through the courts.

  • @MrVideoyoulike
    @MrVideoyoulike ปีที่แล้ว

    So what happens to the 80% builds if they are no longer considered assault rifle any more under this decision?

  • @Freedmevr45
    @Freedmevr45 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A right delayed is a right denied. Granting a stay is direct defiance and should be a mandatory prison sentence for any judge who defies the supreme court and refuses to uphold the laws of the land.

    • @jimklemens5018
      @jimklemens5018 ปีที่แล้ว

      Benitez stayed his own ruling.

    • @Freedmevr45
      @Freedmevr45 ปีที่แล้ว

      @jimklemens5018 in the i was referring to the 11 judge panel when it gets there

  • @garystuber1
    @garystuber1 ปีที่แล้ว

    Joel is right, nothing ever changes, but the bottom line is we have to stay in the fight and support the organization who are fighting for our rights, whether county, state and federal, it is frustrating but we have to stay in it!!!🤔👊👊👊

  • @masonyahn5389
    @masonyahn5389 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    GOOD !!!

  • @christopherhubert1938
    @christopherhubert1938 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah, I’m 63 and I won’t live long enough to see my freedoms restored…..

  • @slam-master4187
    @slam-master4187 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love CRPA tweet to Gavin.. awesome

  • @hansenm2864
    @hansenm2864 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So when can good Californians purchase AR15s again, without restrictions on sCaRy FeAtUrEs or magazine capacity? And when will the rest of the tyrannical states remove their bans 🤷‍♂️? Prayers from the UN-Constitution State of Connecticut 🙏🇺🇸!!

  • @EverythingFilmmaking
    @EverythingFilmmaking ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Get out of my house Dude 😂

  • @benbradshaw5910
    @benbradshaw5910 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is Kommiefornia(I know that is what we are called).For us here time moves slowly .Wins for us are slow and long comming.But when they happen they affect the whole country.Which turns out to help alot of other states.I would suggest helping the the gun groups when you can.The people in the free states are helping us.The sad part is that it takes time.I truely believe we will WIN.

  • @michaelzendejas7416
    @michaelzendejas7416 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Actually both parties are in violation of the second Amendment. GRUSOM for continuing violating Constitution and his oath which is treason and Benitez for doing the same. there is no debate on the 2nd Amendment.

  • @rfjohns1
    @rfjohns1 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    If judge Benitez was really a saint, he wouldn't have put a stay on it. At least give us a freedom week, because that's the only opportunity you'll get for years, if ever, while the case bounces back and forth.

    • @freddieh5539
      @freddieh5539 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Drive to Nevada (wink, wink).

    • @hokanut
      @hokanut ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Freedom week for the assault weapon ban?

    • @ApocalypticFTW1776
      @ApocalypticFTW1776 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Due to politics freedom week is a no no in California now

    • @rfjohns1
      @rfjohns1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@hokanut Both the mag ban and the scary rifle ban.

  • @dragonf1092
    @dragonf1092 ปีที่แล้ว

    These judges can be removed from their benches under title 5 U.S.C. section 7311 Ex. ORD. No. 10450 subsection (5), Title 18 U.S.C. section 1918, Title 18 U.S.C. section 241,242. And article 2 section 4,article 3 shall hold their offices during good behavior (violating, waring against the constitution is bad behavior, grounds for a judges immediate removal from their bench).

  • @Steve-qt9ce
    @Steve-qt9ce ปีที่แล้ว

    The lifetime appointments are a horrible idea for the inferior courts. ONE 15 year Elected term with no chance for further fed. Employment should be the standard.

  • @dangiles5670
    @dangiles5670 ปีที่แล้ว

    Questions for Chuck:
    The last interview I saw with him (can’t remember if it was on Gun Guy TV or somewhere else) he was talking about taking Duncan to SCOTUS. Any further updates on that?
    I didn’t hear Boland/Renna cases mentioned here. Are they in a similar boat as all the others as far as how the 9th will approach them?
    The state put off micro stamping for a few years. Does he expect this to have any effect on Boland/Renna cases?

  • @unkle-
    @unkle- ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can someone file a lawsuit against these corrupt judges? They are effecting every one of these pending cases and personally effecting everyone that lives in California and supports the 2A.

    • @HoyaSaxaSD
      @HoyaSaxaSD ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No. Under longstanding Supreme Court precedent, judges have absolute immunity from
      suit (for better or worse)

    • @jimklemens5018
      @jimklemens5018 ปีที่แล้ว

      No.

  • @zmbombr
    @zmbombr ปีที่แล้ว

    Joel...the idea that we the people will not have to fight for our rights is the false proposition...tyranny exists in and outside this country and will forever strive to undermine human rights. The founders of the Greatest Country, knew this and did their best to give a perpetual structure for citizens to fight back....stay strong, stay vigilant, stay free...there is no silver bullet for this, just getting up everyday and standing our ground.❤

  • @alvingallegos6367
    @alvingallegos6367 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm going to miss breaking that law.

  • @BillAlexander-cv6oj
    @BillAlexander-cv6oj ปีที่แล้ว

    How can these judges be so misaligned , why do they need to find a Method to interpet the Bruen Case? Do they not understand Plain English "Shall not Be Infringed" Scotus needs to do their Job snd Rule accordingly.........

  • @trisystem
    @trisystem ปีที่แล้ว +4

    So can we put regular mag releases back on and pistol grips or not?

    • @jeffreymorgan4381
      @jeffreymorgan4381 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No you can't.

    • @hokanut
      @hokanut ปีที่แล้ว

      Not yet. Soon sounds like.

    • @trisystem
      @trisystem ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m not featureless. I have the cross armor break down rear pin release to remove mag. I thought this new ruling negates the features determining fixed or removable mag? Do we wait to see if the ruling sticks to see if my AR with a pistol grip can have a normal mag release?

  • @musicman7773
    @musicman7773 ปีที่แล้ว

    They also need to find how much these cases have cost from day one.

  • @lillyf40
    @lillyf40 ปีที่แล้ว

    Will I get my California assault weapon registration fee returned with interest?

  • @fakestreamedia5309
    @fakestreamedia5309 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    When will the CA gun roster be challenged?

    • @ApocalypticFTW1776
      @ApocalypticFTW1776 ปีที่แล้ว

      By making it out of wood

    • @1coryahicks
      @1coryahicks ปีที่แล้ว

      That is one of the cases we are still waiting for.

  • @mrsig7381
    @mrsig7381 ปีที่แล้ว

    The 9th Never goes in favor of gun owners!

  • @11B30Inf
    @11B30Inf ปีที่แล้ว

    Glad I moved to Nevada and don't have deal with the Bravo Sierra that is going on in occupied Kalifornistan.

  • @hoppy0720
    @hoppy0720 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think he is way to optimistic. The courts understand how the ruling is supposed to be applied. They’re just not doing it and they won’t anytime soon

  • @marc31415
    @marc31415 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bruen Didn't change the Safety Claws. (the safety claws is part of the foundation of being "well Regulated")
    regulations can be implemented to address very specific problems that pose a danger to public safety.

    • @andnorr7738
      @andnorr7738 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well regulated has nothing to do with government regulation.

    • @jimklemens5018
      @jimklemens5018 ปีที่แล้ว

      Claws?

  • @texture6
    @texture6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Still behind bars waiting for relief, you can’t depend on McDonald, Heller or Bruen.
    Time marches on….standby 3-5 years

  • @gunblade7610
    @gunblade7610 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Soooo can I have a pistol grip now?

    • @armadilllo
      @armadilllo ปีที่แล้ว +2

      no, you'll have to wait ten years to find out you can't

  • @chrisriker6421
    @chrisriker6421 ปีที่แล้ว

    What does it matter, after this week with a Czech corp. Purchasing our ammo producing companys, big ones .ike CCI, Speer, Remington and Winchester saying no more civilian sales 70% of our ammo is gone. Yesterday the was an exllosion at thd Hornady ammo plant, gee, what a convienent accjdent?!?!?!. Looks ,ike we could win everh case and still be scfewed !!!

  • @dragonf1092
    @dragonf1092 ปีที่แล้ว

    All background checks are unconstitutional therefore illegal in violation of article 4 section 2 paragraph 1, second amendment,9th amendment,14th amendment section 1. And illegal felonies in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. section 241 conspiracy against rights, Title 18 U.S.C. section 242, Title 5 U.S.C. section 7311 Ex. ORD. No. 10450 subsection (5).

  • @christopherreeves7915
    @christopherreeves7915 ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s all BS and none of this ever goes anywhere. We all get excited and get our hopes up for nothing and all these donations are becoming a waste of time of money and nothing ever changes.
    People are getting to their point where they don’t care anymore. I asked myself last night being a California native. Will I ever see any of these changes in my lifetime and I am now 50yrs old.

  • @lukehanson5320
    @lukehanson5320 ปีที่แล้ว

    38:45 Since we (arguably) only have 1 generation before SCOTUS swings left, any thoughts on the Court revisiting the holding of Miller '38, in light of Minneapolis Star '83, and Bruen to finally strike down the NFA? Or am I just wishing too hard?

  • @puppetguy64
    @puppetguy64 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, Joel 😁

  • @Edub-vp6rx
    @Edub-vp6rx ปีที่แล้ว

    How un-American how are these people even considered for America? Aren’t they supposed to uphold our laws not tear them down!!!
    I’m just a dumb floor layer and infringement is infringement. Do they not know how to read the definition of a word?

  • @Desperado3248
    @Desperado3248 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Groundhog Day

  • @carrollbridges9341
    @carrollbridges9341 ปีที่แล้ว

    No State or Federal Government can make a Law telling Gun Owner there guns are illeagal or take our Guns

  • @rebelstudio2720
    @rebelstudio2720 ปีที่แล้ว

    They are all committing maladministration against our rights. That is a felony crime.

  • @johnbrady9946
    @johnbrady9946 ปีที่แล้ว

    Forget about it

  • @SuperGiantGeckosLLC
    @SuperGiantGeckosLLC ปีที่แล้ว

    So can we now remove the fin grips & maglocks?!?!

    • @TheRealGunGuyTV
      @TheRealGunGuyTV  ปีที่แล้ว

      No. It's on appeal to the 9th Circuit.

  • @rickmadison7241
    @rickmadison7241 ปีที่แล้ว

    What are they going to do about background checks for ammunition

  • @constitutionalist4391
    @constitutionalist4391 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ok, let's just be honest...the reason nobody believe it will happen is that it seems the 9th is looking for a way to eliminate Bruen. If they can't come up with a legal reason, I'll really be shocked with these pukes that have violated our rights for my entire life. I'm similar age and just as skeptic as Joel. Voter ID ASAP!🗽(so we have better odds at the ballots)

  • @kelvinbel8910
    @kelvinbel8910 ปีที่แล้ว

    FEED THE GTMO

  • @vincentdeleonjr1039
    @vincentdeleonjr1039 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you gentlemen for your explanation but as a layman I'm overwhelm but I do understand bologna

  • @alfonsoarchuleta7280
    @alfonsoarchuleta7280 ปีที่แล้ว

    So with this decision, does this mean that we can take the wing off of our ARs?

    • @TheRealGunGuyTV
      @TheRealGunGuyTV  ปีที่แล้ว

      No. It's on appeal to the 9th Circuit.

  • @warlockcommandcenter
    @warlockcommandcenter ปีที่แล้ว

    Question what effect will the Benitez strike down have on the assault weapon registry that. The state imposed on it’s citizens when do we get to loss the fin grip?

    • @jimklemens5018
      @jimklemens5018 ปีที่แล้ว

      The law will go away when the Supreme Court rules against it.

  • @jr62graham
    @jr62graham ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome

  • @constitutionallyconscious165
    @constitutionallyconscious165 ปีที่แล้ว

    Don't forget about Staples decision

  • @dragonf1092
    @dragonf1092 ปีที่แล้ว

    The justice department (courts) and law enforcement have been operating illegally unconstitutionally for the past 100 years.

  • @dragonf1092
    @dragonf1092 ปีที่แล้ว

    Each and every American citizen is the militia (THE RIGHT of THE PEOPLE). Including felons.

  • @nathansilver4736
    @nathansilver4736 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is: Year's
    S/B: Days

  • @kevos823
    @kevos823 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mark from four boxes diner is saying Benitez is wrong in the way that he is putting the "common use" test in a way that the state in future cases might use to try and manipulate the pro 2A side into carrying the burden. Does Chuck have any concerns of that happening?

    • @TheRealGunGuyTV
      @TheRealGunGuyTV  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hmm... there's nothing specific in your question for me to ask Chuck. What is the gent's specific issue with common use?

  • @williamdurdin1964
    @williamdurdin1964 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Supreme Court, already decided