Are You Good at Being Random? | Attempting to Fake Randomness

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 71

  • @sheepisthename
    @sheepisthename 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    These videos have so much effort and skill put into them, if you targeted a more broad niche - this channel could go viral! Good job man.

  • @doylemichael
    @doylemichael 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Babe wake up, Minding The Data just posted!

  • @fingerbinks279
    @fingerbinks279 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Started gambling a few years back which is how I found you vids, took a stat class recently and the two combined have made probabilities so interesting to me. Your videos have only increased that! Great work and please keep it up for us more lazy but still interested people!

  • @soejrd24978
    @soejrd24978 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ohh yess! I love your channel/uploads dude! Hope you don't confine yourself to one topic, but make whatever you want to make.

  • @dot.4069
    @dot.4069 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    finally!!! a new video!! Great to see you again

  • @zacharylyman504
    @zacharylyman504 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    These videos keep getting better and better...

  • @paytonrodger4669
    @paytonrodger4669 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your videos are so cool and informative. I love the amount of detail you go into while also keeping it basic enough to understand. Really insightful work, good job!

  • @SuperZebezian
    @SuperZebezian 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Loved the video! It was very well-constructed and I think you did a great job of showing some of the discrepancies between human- and computer-generated "randomness."
    Here is a suggestion for future videos: The images of the heads and tails coins were difficult for me to quickly distinguish. I had to look closely at them when trying to tell the difference. If you are making a video in the future that has a similar situation where two or more items are close together but very visually similar, consider coming up with some way to graphically represent those items that allows them to be quickly distinguished by the audience.
    Still, though, like I said: I loved the video!

    • @mindingthedata4218
      @mindingthedata4218  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Appreciate the suggestion! Thanks for watching :)

  • @autismolink9356
    @autismolink9356 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    FYI Spotify needed to change its‘ „shuffle song“ feature from truly random, to an algorithm which mimicked randomness. Since it got too many complaints, that the shuffle didn‘t feel random enough.

    • @vrnvorona
      @vrnvorona 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Except it wasn't spotify but iTunes, and it was far before spotify existed.

    • @autismolink9356
      @autismolink9356 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vrnvorona Spotify does it aswell

    • @vrnvorona
      @vrnvorona 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@autismolink9356 because everyone does. literally. all "shuffle" methods are pseudo-random to prevent illusion of not-randomness.

  • @Brecherbernd
    @Brecherbernd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I always enjoy your vids, glad youre back

  • @RealLagu
    @RealLagu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    nice to see a new video from you

  • @Errichto
    @Errichto 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So what metrics were most useful? Is anything better than the longest run?

  • @questienick
    @questienick 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is my favorite channel

  • @WeGoToMars
    @WeGoToMars 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Welcome back!

  • @jaimalani6146
    @jaimalani6146 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Man! Why you stopped? We really need more videos from you

  • @daltonbough3302
    @daltonbough3302 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really glad to see videos from you

  • @nikvas_
    @nikvas_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Man i love your videos!

  • @JamystroV2
    @JamystroV2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    that's for the programming course been meaning to learn python for a while!

  • @oscarpetersson5324
    @oscarpetersson5324 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Truly Random 92.12%.
    I did know there have to be some streaks, but I really just typed it in myself.
    Still loved the video

  • @felipediniz2048
    @felipediniz2048 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you go over on some PCA analysis to know which metrics are more useful, and if you could get a similar prediction with a smaller number of metrics?

  • @rakshitrohan9136
    @rakshitrohan9136 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Damn, amazing research.

  • @naxnusternann332
    @naxnusternann332 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome vid!

  • @davisbarthen1142
    @davisbarthen1142 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video!

  • @VOMotion
    @VOMotion 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome video

  • @FebriyanaMuhammad
    @FebriyanaMuhammad 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I cant access the website

  • @saginisagini2612
    @saginisagini2612 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    @minding the data hey hello can you do a video on the math behind virtual football games

  • @gang8bp138
    @gang8bp138 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    do you work for jim simons?

  • @user-jd1cy9gp3q
    @user-jd1cy9gp3q 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good video!

  • @erick-llerenas
    @erick-llerenas 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow you are awesome!!

  • @Quantowski
    @Quantowski 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My personal input is random with 80% confidence :)

    • @mindingthedata4218
      @mindingthedata4218  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      W 🏆

    • @Quantowski
      @Quantowski 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mindingthedata4218 great video BTW. Any chance for at least a sequel to trading bot video?

    • @mindingthedata4218
      @mindingthedata4218  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks so much! Glad you enjoyed it :) I am definitely planning more stock market videos in the future

    • @floriangrawe1955
      @floriangrawe1955 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mine is around that aswell haha. But if you know the tricks you can outplay the AI quite easily. Would be nice to be able to correct the AI, so it can learn from its mistakes. But very interesting video, thanks for being active again. Missed your videos!

    • @floriangrawe1955
      @floriangrawe1955 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "HTHHHTTHTTTHHTHTHHTTTHHHHHHHTHTHTTTTHHHHHTTHTHTTTH" This was my input i came up with. 85.29% haha

  • @charlesfowler4308
    @charlesfowler4308 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could you make the training data available so people could try making their own models

  • @amiraalhasan2218
    @amiraalhasan2218 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you!! very helpful and informative video🥰🥰. However, I tried using the link to check how random I am, but the link is not working !
    and I visited your website, and the link was there, but it still didn't work.

  • @petertroep9085
    @petertroep9085 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome a new video

  • @jackdwyer22
    @jackdwyer22 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    another great video, facebook is shaking

  • @naxnusternann332
    @naxnusternann332 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could you maybe put the website back on?

  • @Cas_is_Cool
    @Cas_is_Cool 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Haven't you severely overfitted your model by having 1000 decision trees in your model? or did i not understand the model?

  • @marnopretorius9238
    @marnopretorius9238 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you make video on andar bahar Or roulette red black game because I've seen in online casino has straight red or black back to back 18 time. Same in andar bahar game card comes andar Or bahar more then 15 times or 18 time does it that even possible??

  • @Lvlerience
    @Lvlerience 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice vid =)

  • @doylemichael
    @doylemichael 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    No validation set?

  • @shotx333
    @shotx333 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Next crazy time or monopoly form evolution gaming pls.

  • @eli0uz
    @eli0uz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The website is down :(

  • @Dropout-gr9gx
    @Dropout-gr9gx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My random "TH" got a 99% confidence: THTTTTTTHTTTHTHTHTHTHHHHHTHHTHHTHTHTHTHTTHTHTHTHTH
    Try get 100%

  • @eduardoxenofonte4004
    @eduardoxenofonte4004 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i faked a sequence and got 95% random and right after i put a random sequence and it got 52% towards human generated 💀💀💀

  • @FizzyToni
    @FizzyToni 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes, at least pseudorandom. I use google rng or my python code or similar

  • @wsdea
    @wsdea 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fooled it on my first two tries ! I guess it helps to spam my keyboard keys

  • @dunnperfect8567
    @dunnperfect8567 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Let’s go first try and they are 92.75 confident that it is truly random

  • @FizzyToni
    @FizzyToni 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was clicking keys on my keyboard and the software predicted correctly sequences being human made for the first two times with low confidence of 55ish %. But then on the next run it gave 99% confidence on my sequence being truly random. I guess it was somewhat random since I was just pressing keys arbitrarily but not truly random.

  • @John-Smlth
    @John-Smlth 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like randomness problems like this, it is one of the very few times I can make use of the 500 digits of pi I memorised as a kid...
    Starting with a little offset, then taking even values as heads, and odds as tails. Me, a human, is able to generate a very random sequence that easily fools even your intelligent bot.

  • @gohluke
    @gohluke ปีที่แล้ว

    the site doesnt work

  • @dineshc3121
    @dineshc3121 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bro the website didn't working

  • @grizlethebear8652
    @grizlethebear8652 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i am very random! I got 95.59% truly random.

  • @sevir408
    @sevir408 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    pseudorandom function =/= truely random
    But sure, for this experiment it's good enough I guess...

  • @randomboii9166
    @randomboii9166 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    96% truly random first try before watching the vid

  • @GabrielSilva-jn7cp
    @GabrielSilva-jn7cp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This set of coin flips is predicted to be Truly Random
    Prediction Confidence: 97.06%
    Once you know the rules it's easy to fool the model

  • @brickkid30
    @brickkid30 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I got robot 75% confidence

  • @claw4120
    @claw4120 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I beat your bot