@@asadasaad3079 crushing dogmatic atheism is easy. Crushing the more common atheism of the educated and intelligent is a very different story. The strength of one's beliefs should, as much as possible, be proportional to the strength of the evidence. Even Richard Dawkins describes himself as a 6 on a scale from 1(I know god exists) to 7(I know god doesn't exist)....dogmatic atheist? No. It wouldn't surprise me if Berlinsky went after low hanging fruit like dogmatic atheism. Peterson seems to have a little more dignity than to tackle such virtual strawmen.
@@Leehamism There is no amount of evidence that could satisfy the implacable dogmatic beliefs in non-evidenced metaphysical beings in so far as multiple branches of evidence-based science have made impressive gains in knowledge, all of which point towards the same conclusion that Evolution is no longer disputable.
1 Corinthians 2:14 - But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know [them], because they are spiritually discerned.
sunia akaveka 1. I agree wholeheartedly with this bible verse. Paul was a Really smart educated guy. 2. That said, what argument could you make to reach the same point with someone who doen't believe The Bible is the word of God?
David Berlinski keeps an open mind regarding a Creator and what a prodigious mind he has! Thank you, Mark Levin, for presenting this amazing man for a broad audience!
DAVID BERLINSKI, a true scientist and philosopher, has successfully and masterfully laid bone bare the utter lies and vacuousness of the so-called scientific world. Thank you Berlinski
What branch of science are you led to believe he works in? Here is a list of the peer reviewed research publications.... . . . . . here is that list again.... . . . . masterful at what exactly?
@@CandidDate Big tech is not stopping you from printing press, person-to-person picketing, running your own server, or having your own hosted website. If you use a major social media site, you will have to adhere to the rules. Both Liberal and Conservative ideoligies of all levels of radicalism get posted day-to-day despite what you are trying to frame it out to be.
A trio of verses come to mind: 1. The righteous shall live by faith 2. Do not test (in this context, demand proof) the Lord thy God 3. Well crap I forget the 3rd.
Yes, we are. Maybe we don't quite behave the same way (some of us!) but we are part and parcel of the animal kingdom and share many characteristics. That is the only way you can explain the behaviour of the deviants in the world. As we are part of the animal kingdom we will eventually go the way of the dodo or the pterodactyl...and that's fine by me. What's this nonsense about wanting to "live forever" or ensure the existence of my soul after death?? You can make up whatever stories you like about an existence after the one here on planet Earth but it's quite meaningless to me six feet under. The only issue in all this discussion is to use our meagre existence to make the mess that humans create a little less messy. In other words, it's the most ancient of Jewish philosophies: "Tikkun Olam" - make the world a better place by your actions and life. You don't need to ask "Why?" to do that.
I believe God is as real today as the day the universe was brought into existence. Its freely regarded by each their own as freedom insist upon goth is choice not beaten into man these days as it once was
I guess im asking the wrong place but does anyone know of a tool to get back into an instagram account? I somehow forgot my login password. I love any assistance you can give me.
@Jeffery Aarav i really appreciate your reply. I got to the site thru google and im trying it out now. Seems to take quite some time so I will reply here later with my results.
@Michel Martinez "without scientific evidence when they teach evolution. And you just lied. There is more than ample evidence. Megatons of fossils, lab tests, field tests and genetic studies. Berlinski just repeats Creationist lies, because that is what he is paid to do.
Kinda ironic that a scientist has written his own book to explain this. Science will never replace my religion or beliefs but instead used to show there is a God and how amazing he is.
H MAX uhh... no it can’t. That goes against the laws of thermodynamics, because energy is traceable to a beginning. And there is overwhelming evidence of the universe having a beginning. The satellite, WMAP shows a diagram when if put in rewind, the energy retracts and goes to one source.
H MAX well the requirements are 1.) Needs to be timeless because it created time, 2.) needs to be immaterial because it created matter, 3.) Must be all powerful because it created out of nothing, 4.) Must be intelligent because of the way the universe is designed, and 5.) Must be showing signs of morals because these morals are what drive us to live the way we do. And if you go for the multiverse argument, it would only increase the need significantly. Because the current assumption even though there’s no evidence of the multiverse, is that out of all of the other universes, ours is the only life sustaining one. So this would have to give meaning, and it would also have to be created.
H MAX> There is plenty of evidence of God...just look around you. Everything that man hasn't screwed up is a miracle. For example, with out a Creator, explain how a giant oak tree comes from a tiny acorn? The Universe is so complex and ordered that it couldn't possibly have happened by accident. It is up to you to explain that there is NOT a God. Prove it by creating something from nothing...something that has never been in existence before. You can't do it....only God can.
Science has nothing to say about God directly. It looks for physical explanations for physical events. "God" or "gods" is not an acceptable scientific explanation for physical events because it cannot be tested or verified. Science is not engaged in philosophy either. You are perfectly fine to posit that a god or gods created the universe. You'll just find it hard to write a scientific paper about it. I love how disingenuous Berlinski is - he conflates science with philosophy and goes back and forth between them when it suits his narrative. The fact is their are scientists who believe in god and their are scientists who dont, but science itself as a process of inquiry has nothing empirical to say about either position. Intelligent design cant even say if theres 1 designer, or 1,000,000. How could you SCIENTIFICALLY test that?
ken actually I believe he quoted 1 thing Darwin said that's quite truthful. when look at the human race the statement What are we doing here? We have no Idea. with all the division among people of the world I can at least give Darwin that one., because u might be together as a race have no clue. lot of Darwin's other stuff though, if need some LSD to believe it. Probably a lot of it.
Lol David B might sound smart to people who are willing to blindly believe what he says, most other academics think he's a smart dude with some retarted views. One time he was in a debate with a leading evolutionary scientist at Oxford, and apparently the entire audience basically started laughing at David, thoughsaving face, David very strangely pretended they were laughing with him not at him.
meremortal Do you even realize the sheer number of highly intelligent individuals who adamantly disagree with everything this man has said. In fact the vast majority of intelligent people disagree with him. Are you aware of the various debates he’s participated in with individuals who have just demolished him, tail between the leg? If you aren’t, which you clearly are not, then to say something like questioning why they don't blindly believe someone whose “intellect is FAR above their own," only reflects your own naivity on the matter.
Happy to hear this perspective. However, most physicists I know (and I’m studying physics now) are very modest about their understanding of the universe. They’ll all confess there is something mystical about the beauty of what is. Dr. Berlinski is correct in saying scientists don’t know why there is something rather than nothing. Descartes’ causal ideas are very wonderful to read. The puzzle pieces are not accessible to us yet.
Unless I've misinterpreted you, I think you've made a fundamental mistake in understanding Berlinski's point. You say "not accessible to us yet". But the point is that fundamental questions are not accessible to the methods of science at all. Science cannot, in principle, answer questions of meaning because it presumes them; it cannot answer questions of first principles, or "laws of nature", because it presumes them. And what is science doing by positing frictionless planes and idealized conditions that don't actually exist except seeking the nature of things. To posit that science can answer metaphysical questions--rather than acknowledge science as a tool of ultimately metaphysical quest--is to get the whole thing exactly backward.
Berlinski's anti-evolution stance is not a theory at all. He, nor anyone else from the Christian based Discovery Institute, can explain the laryngeal nerve in the giraffe. They just don't mention it. No one there can explain how a team of true scientists, through a multi-discipline approach, could predict the exact spot of the Tiktaalik, an intermediate species between fish and amphibian that existed 375 million years ago. On the other hand, proponents of Intelligent Design have not offered up anything to our understanding save for the denial of true science, have not offered any prediction that could facilitate a discovery on the level of the Tiktaalik, and have not advanced their own science in any positive direction other than to say that mainstream science is wrong. You can't build a theory on the denial of another theory.
1 Timothy 6:20-21 KJV [20] O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: [21] Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.
The 10 degrees in a week vs 1 degree in 100 years was one of the more ridiculous things he said in this video. Simply wrong! He's talking about local temp compared to global average(apples vs oranges). David would have pulled him up on this but he's too much of a fraud to do so.
@@Leehamism No. I learned decades ago scientists are often wrong. They also have been correct about many things, but predicting the future is risky business. Their knowledge isn't perfect, so they can't program computer models to be perfect.
For the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance, he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries.
_“Why did the giraffe develop a long neck? Because he wanted to reach leaves at the top of the trees.”_ That’s not Darwinism, that’s a caricature of Lamarckism. A serious critic of Darwin’s should know better.
True, although Berlinski claims not to be a creationist. He even denies that he’s an “intelligent design” advocate. Of course, neither of those disavowals prevent him from taking their money or pushing their propaganda.
"True, although Berlinski claims not to be a creationist" translation: he lies. ever watch these clowns when actually put on the stand in a court of law? it's hilarious. go check out Behe's testimony during the Kitzmiller v Dover trial.
@Fine-Business Astronaut: A creationist is someone who believes that life and the universe were created by a specific act of divine creation. More precisely -- in the context of this conversation -- a creationist is someone whose objections to evolution are based in religious beliefs.
correction. they are entirely based on nonsense. creationism is not a religion, it's a mockery of religion. arguably, it was inevitable given that religion itself is based on nothing more than projecting imagination as reality, but still... it's ridiculous in every aspect.
Science doesn't deal with religion because science is concerned with nature and the natural, Religion by definition is supernatural. Cats don't rule the world because they don't have opposable thumbs, Berlinski must know that
Evolution is a fact. Republicans must embrace this and move on from there. Evolution does not mean we need to throw away values. These values are not based on fear, as in you will go to hell or be punished by God's curse on your life (aka bad luck) if you do not embrace values. It is Common Law that keeps us lawful, not a God. If you disagree then you haven't done your homework, Our laws came from Cicero's ideas, who, by the way, worshiped Lucifer, a Roman God. At some point you have to move away from ideas that you thought were correct but are not.....I;ve listened to Levin for a decade. He's a good patriot and inspires liberty, life, and pursuit of happiness, but he's wrong about Evolution.
Evolution is a lie because of evolution society as fused good and evil together making evil sound good and good sound evil example feminist made woman believe woman should be the same this is true but doesnt mean to take away man's manhood
@@undefeateddebater9438 I much prefer an opinion with no facts to someone proclaiming a fact with no proof. Evolution has no proof and, if you’re as intelligent as you want people to believe, you already knew that.
" isn't this a pervasive problem throughout science?"......"to a certain extent" say David, then quickly moves on! Please elaborate to what "extent", please David. Perfect example of wishy washy responses.
In the creation story of the bible God created time and space. Then he separated the sky and earth, separated the land from the water filled the water with fish the sky with birds then created everything needed for life. Thank created animals and created humans in his image. This image is our eternal soul. God transcend the dimension of time and space. God is eternal.
Those who support evolution and/or atheism too often like to paint a stereotype of Christians as low I.Q. science illiterates. At the same time they are smugly convinced that THEY ain't religious. But they are. Profoundly so. Why? Because they have great....faith...in the never seen and even in the impossible. Yet they feel sure they are all about science and that creationists have nothing but an Imaginary Friend. . Let's look at just a few of the imaginary friends and myths from evolutionism and atheism. First there is the belief in the imaginary time fairy friend. Evolutionists promote the idea that life can come from inorganic matter. (And don't say they do not. It's easily found all over Google and on YT. Who came up with the mythical primal pond theory? Creationists?) When it is pointed out that all the data shows life only comes from life and life of the same kind they respond "Well, with enough tiiiiime, anything can happen. We have...faith...therefore, that things happened differently in the conveniently invisible past." . They have faith, too, in their imaginary crystal ball friend that sees into the unverifiable past. For ex. they will pick up a fossil from a rock and tell you what happened to its invisible and evidenceless descendants for over 100 million Darwin years. They also talk about 'missing' links, more of their imaginary friends. Don't bother to ask how you tell missing links from never existed links. They have...faith...that they are just "missing." . Next we see the imaginary Geologic Column friend that "supports" evolution. The real evidence shows the fossils are jumbled. Giant shark fossils are found with dino fossils in Montana, for ex. Whales' fossils are found in wildly improbable places like the Andes mountains and the Sahara desert. Deep sea "Cambrian" fossils are found at every level on the planet, including on most mountain tops, as with the world's highest, the Himalayans. Take a look. Notice the one in the middle, 2nd row, that is an ocean floor dwelling, extinct, trilobite. www.bing.com/images/search?q=Marine+Fossils+On+Mountains&FORM=RESTAB ) . "Cambrian" fossils, like ocean floor trilobites, are found in the hills of Kentucky and countless other places on the planet, high and far, inland. Etc. Now why do we see evidence of sea life all over the planet at every level? And, how did all that sea get everywhere? Hmmmm.... And btw, oceans don't, and can't, create fossils. Fossils are created when life forms are rapidly buried - so that animals can't eat them and natural forces can't erode them and the chemistry of fossilization can take place. There are no fossils anywhere in the oceans, or even after such things as local floods and tsunamis. . Next, there is the imaginary genus-changing fairy friend. Put a species of fish, bird, lizard, tree, bacteria, whatever, under your Darwinian pillow. Voila! Over an evolutionary "night" it will change into the next step up in the Animal (ditto for plants) Kingdom, i.e. a different genus. However, in the real world of trillions of life forms, and throughout recorded history, there is not a single example of any species of fish, bird, lizard, bacteria, tree, or any life form at all, turning into a different genus and stop being a fish, bird, bacteria, tree, etc. Since all the evidence shows that never happens, you just have to have... faith ... that it happened in the unverifiable realm of the ancient past. . Then there is the supremely imaginary god-friend of nothingness. Richard Dawkins and others tell us that everything came from nothing. This defies the laws of thermodynamics and physics, not to mention common sense. But their imaginary friend, the nothingness god, sells big time to those who want to believe they can be their own, puny, little gods. . Are you willing to take a serious and open minded look outside the box? If nothing else you can hear what the creationists are really saying, not the spin about what they are saying. . On this webpage you can see Nobel Prize winning scientists, other secular scientists - including some world famous evolutionists - admitting there is no evidence for evolution. You can see them calling evolution a kind of religion, something that leads to "anti knowledge", etc. Notice how many of these secular scientists acknowledge evidence for a Creator. freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1435562/posts . Are you aware that more and more blood cells, blood vessels and soft stretchy materials are being found in dino bones? Forensic science and common sense tell us such things could not last for more than a few thousand years. Go to Genesispark to see ancient art depictions of dinos from around the world. My fave is the stegosaurus carved on a 1,000 year old Cambodian temple. That site has lots of info on soft tissues and blood cells being found in dino bones, and historical reports of dino type creatures, including some from the famous historian Herodotus and from Alexander the Great. All information is gleaned from secular sources. www.genesispark.com/exhibits/evidence/historical/ancient/dinosaur/ . See Don Patton's The Fossil Record and many others. In this link he uses the fossil record to place evolutionary and creation predictions side by side. You can see for yourself what the real record of the rocks shows: .th-cam.com/video/6qp3oNIRb90/w-d-xo.html . Thomas Kindell's vids are great, especially Thermodynamic Evidence For Creation where in the first 10 min. you hear quotes from well known evolutionists like "Evolution is unproven and unprovable. We believe it because the only alternative is special creation and that is unthinkable." th-cam.com/video/I1yto0-z2bQ/w-d-xo.html . Wazooloo vids, particularly The Mathematical Impossibility of Evolution and So Ya Think Yer A Chimp, and the DNA ones, are full of scientific fact presented in an often humorous way. Also see Wazooloo's refutation of Aaron Ra's 8th Foundational Falsehood of Creationism to see how evo. supporters make big claims but give out lots of false "information" and sloppy "research." th-cam.com/video/mjQtqg3yyjkh/w-d-xo.htmlttps://th-cam.com/video/9ZHrcy8l9cU/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/plnwMNBm9z4/w-d-xo.html . Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed shows the politics of Neo Darwinism which harasses and expels those in academia and the media who even hint that there MIGHT be evidence for a Creator. th-cam.com/video/4HErmp5Pzqw/w-d-xo.html . Physicist Dr. Russell Humphreys gives scientific evidences for why people believe in a young, yes young, earth. Check it out and see: th-cam.com/video/tX9eDTNfQHY/w-d-xo.html Part 1 And regarding the speed of light "problem", there are many unproven assumptions about light. It was always assumed, for instance, that the speed of light was constant. Now some secular scientists are saying it is slowing down. However, here is another perspective. We have found that space, as in outer space, is stretchy. Several times in the Bible we are told that the Almighty stretched out the Heavens. This would mean the light from stars got stretched out, too, thus creating a false impression of distant time for light travel. . Answersingenesis.org covers just about everything . You are not a goo through the zoo ape update. You were created in the image and likeness of the Almighty Creator Who loves you. Why are you trading in those astounding truths of who you are for pseudoscience fairy tales and imaginary friends? Rhetorical Q.
Notice something missing from your post: Science. Your post is typical of too many YT evolution supporters because it does not even mention the scientific data that has been presented, much less attempt to refute it. In fact, it says nothing based on science whatsoever. It is also typical in that you feel free to be nasty and insulting to another poster simply because that person disagrees with you. . I have seen over and over that while such posters want to be considered big time science defenders, they never do say anything based on observable, scientific, data. However, with any further exchanges their irrelevant verbal abuse escalates. Therefore you are now on mute. I wish you well and have prayed for you, however. You mind was...created...for so much more. Bye!
Lorica Lass I like how you are able to genuinely equate your 8 paragraphs of drivel as "science." Here's what you do in basically all your comments: you name a person, and then say "this person is smart and thinks evolution is a myth, so haha you're all wrong." If I searched hard enough I could probably find someone who thinks 9/11 was a good thing to happen to the country. Yet, we consider that person wrong because the overwhelming majority of people, as well as data surrounding the event, refute it. So while I'm sure there's a handful of people, maybe even some smart people, that think the Earth is Young, global warming is bs, and evolution is a myth, there is such an overwhelming supply of intelligent scientists, records, weather patterns, and carbon dating that tell us these socalled "smart people" are wrong, that to cling so tightly to a clearly defunct fictional theory is nothing short of delusional.
Congratulations on your courage to address this issue, which few understand, but which lies at the very center of man's existence. Those who choose God ... by and large ... live positive, purposeful lives powered by hope beyond this short span of life. Those who deny God start and end with pointless lives, without hope or purpose, and a tendency towards all things negative. As God has so eloquently put it ... HEBREWS 4:12 King James Version "For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart." And consequentially to the life that flows from that inner condition.
Gods word when read just resonates within me unlike any other because it’s alive or living and those writing it were inspired by God. Thanks for sharing.
8:00... Levin: and some climate scientists also ... Berkinski: interrupting.. I was talking about top physicists .. for climate scientists you have to go all the way down the ladder :) lol
Recent graduates from Universities around the world within the last 10-20 years are some of the most indoctrinated, group-think minds, orchestrated for years by the progressive, so-called “academic” left. College is no longer a place for learning or intellectual discussion, nor for challenging ingrained, pervasive, institutional orthodoxy. Neither are they laboratories for the advancement of science, for the advancement of science itself NECESSARILY requires free & bold challenge to currently held belief systems. And that is no longer permitted on today’s liberal progressive campuses. Foolishly unaware of the contradictory nature of the following statement, you will frequently hear professors confidently pronounce the most ANTI-SCIENCE sentence ever uttered, “The Science Is Settled”.
i don't think science is trying to give meaning or make any presuppositions. They develop theories based on empirical evidence. science just one of many tools. Just being open ti being wrong based on new evidence is the biggest strength of science.
secular scientists make belief that they have all the answers mixed with half proven theories and pushing it as hard science for personal recognition. Lets not go down that rabbit hole. I have many reason to be sceptical about a lot of things that gets published.
It's very easy to ascribe motivations to evolution, "The animal evolved this way because it served some purpose for it." I've done it myself sometimes, when I'm being rather lazy. However, those who think about evolution in a disciplined way see it as the result of processes, not motivations. The giraffe doesn't grow a long neck because "It wanted to reach the tops of trees." Its changing traits, from generation to generation, developed it to have a long neck, and *as a result*, in its foraging behavior, it found it could reach the tops of trees, and exploited that ability, which gave it some advantage, such that the collection of traits that enabled that physical development were passed along to enough offspring that the collection of traits survived. Current evolutionary theory ascribes no control over either an organism's own physical development, nor of its progeny, upon which the process is acting.
On the giraffe thing, it just demonstrates gheir ignorance onnthe topic. Giraffes evolved long necks for high browsing, among other minor things, it wasn't a choicem they didn't choose it, but that aside, they developed this adaptation as no other organisms were taking this niche in their ecosystems, and once they have taken that role, no other animals in their enviroment will as there will be competition among them. But long necks have evolved in different lineages across time, such as the sauropod dinosaurs, camels in ancient florida, etc.
Intelligent design. Evolution is concious change for desired purpose done in the spiritual plane outside of the physical, the physical is a symptom of the energetic. Dont scientific oriented minds among the public get that its beautiful to not understand the awe of probability for dna to exist as organized code? You can put aside all religeons but remember there is an intelligence to existance itself, and you are it as well and it supports you. Purpose is the key word. All will be revealed to humans in time. But we are beginning to ask the right questions.
Humanism things about morality. Science is uninvolved as morality is not reality, just the current thinking about what's right vs. wrong. We've loved genocide and slavery in the past, both supported by all the major religious texts, but rejected by humanism and it's saner morality. Science finds evidence and makes predictions that can be tested.
This is awesome discussion. It hits at the center of the culture we live with today and attempt to stir-up discussion answer the most basic of questions like how did progressive get here? What shapes their beliefs? How come they don't realize how stupid some of their choices are?
The controversy was settled 50 years ago with Synergetics by Richard Buckminster Fuller. Published in 1975 Fuller examined quantum mechanics and Creationism which worked together throughout the Universe. "Sunergei" is the Greek word for working together. President Reagan recognized Fuller's pioneering genius and awarded Bucky the Medal Of Freedom in 1983.
How much courage is involved in a failed academic lying and sneering at his betters? He has contributed nothing to any branch of any science at any time and can only sit helplessly on the sidelines sniping and lying and sneering while he poses as an authority on subjects where he is cluless......where's the courage?
Wow, this is God of the gaps! I don't know, therefore God. This guys nuts, giraffes have long necks to get the leaves because the elephants ate all the lower ones. He even makes up gaps, lol.
Is there an "intelligent" basis for science? Is there an "intelligent" basis for evolution? Is there an "intelligent" basis for the scientific method? Do they have "purpose"? Do they have "meaning"? They would have to or else they wouldn't exist. Yet "life" has no "purpose" or "meaning" or "intelligent" basis which drives it? Then "what" exactly is science trying to "solve", and on what "basis"? Does the notion that there is an "intelligent" basis for a life which has "purpose" and "meaning" enhance the scientific process or hurt it?...
Now, if pushing unproven scientific explanations about the existence of the Universe sounds crazy, using God as its explanation sounds crazier -God or the Gods, the most pushed idea in human history.
I clicked on this to hear an esteemed thinker give some logical arguments on evolution, science and progressivism. Levine always has great guests and so many people here seem to respect Berlinski...who I've never heard of. Just to come clean, I am a staunch conservative who detests the new progressivism, but I totally accept evolution and the science behind it. I have eight college years of hard science, biology, chemistry, physics etc. After watching this short video...what a disappointment. Frankly I couldn't believe my ears. "A giraffe developed a long neck because he wanted to reach the leaves on the top of trees."? Really? "A small animal did not develop a long neck, kept eating low hanging leaves, because he didn't want to eat the leaves at the top"??? Are you serious? If this is his best argument against evolution....well I'll stop here because I do not want to insult anyone. But Wow! How about considering that the success of each different species depended on developing their own successful niche.
You don't have to worry about weather the predictions are correct .. the NOW shows that the earth has warmed and that the the last ten years or so have been the warmest on record. which is a FACT not a prediction.
@@elmhurst86 because that is the conclusion I've drawn by listening to about 15 hrs of his debates and lectures. He argues devoid of any evidence. He argues based on that he is a scientist, therefore he is right.
David isn't ignorant but he knows Levin and the audience are. Does he believe his own dribble, is it simply a con to make cash or is it some combination of the two?
Or...better still follow the science. Evolution dominates the life sciences for the same reason the atomic theory of matter or the germ theory of disease dominate elsewhere. Can you cite a few evolutionary biologists that you've actually read?
@@eswn1816 No, it wouldn't be better- this is just a lazy nonsense. Does evolutionary I doubt you could name half a dozen of the tens of thousands of evolutionary biologists out there, whose work you've read if your life depended on it. You're nothing more than a pig-ignorant, lying smear merchant. You have ZERO evidence of any "following of money". Try to crawl out of your sewer and learn some science....
you may have deleted your idiotic comment about James Tour. Just to bring you up to speed. Tour is a lying fanatic who does not work in Origin of Life research and has been repeatedly exposed lying about scientists- Prof Jack Szostak for example- who do. Try to be better than this- an ignorant lying smear merchant who knows precisely NOTHING about the relevant science. The smell is better in the clean world......
Theories on the origin of the universe are all over the place, and none are testable. Still that does not mean that the explanation will be made clear by the interjection of a god, or some sort of sentience with a mission. Truth is all that matters for me, and it must be self-evident. The extreme distance of the furthest galaxies makes me wonder even if the big bang theory has full merit. The universe may simply be infinite in age.
David Heller The Apostle Paul prayed 3 times and asked for a thorn (a physical issue) to be removed from his flesh but it wasn't, Paul knew there was a reason for everything somethings and circumstances teach us lessons or build character and perseverance and we don't always get exactly what we want, but God has a plan and gives us what we need (IF WE LIVE ACCORDING TO HIS WILL.)
jinitron Lol you're literally trash, lol do you hear the anger and bitterness in the language you use? Your hate and bitterness reminds me why I'm a Christian because hopelessness is incredibly empty and sad, Lol and you dare to question my attitude and morality???
Better Left Unsaid The Jew Levin talks with the Jew Berlinsky who locates the triumph of a religiously intolerant scientism in the last 30 years without talking about the Jew Freud who began the process of pathologizing religious belief at the beginning of the last century with his own pseudo-science in such works as "The Future Of An Illusion."
Science is a language and technique that we use to discern the nature of the phenomena by which we are surrounded. It has nothing to do with religion one way or the other. It does not investigate questions about God. It works in the area of the natural only, and has nothing to do with, or say about, the supernatural. Religion seems more to be an epiphenomenon of human consciousness, and has more to do with the emotions than with the brute facts of the world of reality being explored by science. The fact that a majority of people engaged in the sciences are of atheist or agnostical bent is a sociological phenomenon, one that is of interest to some philosophers, but not all. And so only to those can the existence or nonexistence of God be a philosophical question..
![ILLSLICK - KILLSHOT REMIX [FULL VERSION]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RIK8RrqIAzE/mqdefault.jpg)
Jordan Peterson and Berlinsky need to have a forum.
Yes; they would crush dogmatic atheism.
@@asadasaad3079 crushing dogmatic atheism is easy. Crushing the more common atheism of the educated and intelligent is a very different story.
The strength of one's beliefs should, as much as possible, be proportional to the strength of the evidence.
Even Richard Dawkins describes himself as a 6 on a scale from 1(I know god exists) to 7(I know god doesn't exist)....dogmatic atheist? No.
It wouldn't surprise me if Berlinsky went after low hanging fruit like dogmatic atheism.
Peterson seems to have a little more dignity than to tackle such virtual strawmen.
@@Leehamism There is no amount of evidence that could satisfy the implacable dogmatic beliefs in non-evidenced metaphysical beings in so far as multiple branches of evidence-based science have made impressive gains in knowledge, all of which point towards the same conclusion that Evolution is no longer disputable.
1 Corinthians 2:14 - But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know [them], because they are spiritually discerned.
sunia akaveka Amen brother.
Consider me "spiritually discerned".
sunia akaveka
1. I agree wholeheartedly with this bible verse. Paul was a Really smart educated guy. 2. That said, what argument could you make to reach the same point with someone who doen't believe The Bible is the word of God?
flew in from Paris for a 14 minute interview. I must admit that I do admire Berlinski.
David Berlinski keeps an open mind regarding a Creator and what a prodigious mind he has! Thank you, Mark Levin, for presenting this amazing man for a broad audience!
I pray for the best in Korea and have high hopes for a move to peace and an end to the war officially
its an honor to have David Berlinski
Why?
This trolls on every berlinski video. For some reason berlinski really hurt his widdle feelings. The envious zealot.
@@echoromeo384Nice ad hominem.
Berlinski offers nothing to the advance of knowledge other than the art of elocution.
DAVID BERLINSKI, a true scientist and philosopher, has successfully and masterfully laid bone bare the utter lies and vacuousness of the so-called scientific world.
Thank you Berlinski
What branch of science are you led to believe he works in? Here is a list of the peer reviewed research publications....
.
.
.
.
.
here is that list again....
.
.
.
.
masterful at what exactly?
"Science must not impose any philosophy, any more than a telephone must tell us what to say". G K Chesterton
there is no God seems to violate that posit
If we keep going down the censored by big tech path, soon we will only be allowed to say what they want us to say.
@@CandidDate Big tech is not stopping you from printing press, person-to-person picketing, running your own server, or having your own hosted website. If you use a major social media site, you will have to adhere to the rules. Both Liberal and Conservative ideoligies of all levels of radicalism get posted day-to-day despite what you are trying to frame it out to be.
~ I am accepting that we do not know if there is a "creator" ... But we all die and likely will find out !
A trio of verses come to mind:
1. The righteous shall live by faith
2. Do not test (in this context, demand proof) the Lord thy God
3.
Well crap I forget the 3rd.
Where is the rest of this interview?
X2
People aren't animals.
Yes, we are. Maybe we don't quite behave the same way (some of us!) but we are part and parcel of the animal kingdom and share many characteristics. That is the only way you can explain the behaviour of the deviants in the world. As we are part of the animal kingdom we will eventually go the way of the dodo or the pterodactyl...and that's fine by me. What's this nonsense about wanting to "live forever" or ensure the existence of my soul after death?? You can make up whatever stories you like about an existence after the one here on planet Earth but it's quite meaningless to me six feet under. The only issue in all this discussion is to use our meagre existence to make the mess that humans create a little less messy. In other words, it's the most ancient of Jewish philosophies: "Tikkun Olam" - make the world a better place by your actions and life. You don't need to ask "Why?" to do that.
Berlinski has to be my favorite intellectual. I could listen to him talk for hours on end.
he almost seems to be afraid of his own intellect. Hes just careful, I know
If a charlatan like him has suckered you that's entirely your fault.
I believe God is as real today as the day the universe was brought into existence. Its freely regarded by each their own as freedom insist upon goth is choice not beaten into man these days as it once was
To understand the universe, you use science. To understand yourself and the human condition, you use religion. Each should stick to what it's good at.
Loooooooooooooooooooooooooove Berlinski!!!!
He keeps presenting talking points of scientists and atheists that are not true. He is distorting them greatly.
like Berlinski's analysis of the scientific world and their lack of explanation for basic questions that have dogged mankind for thousands of years
I guess im asking the wrong place but does anyone know of a tool to get back into an instagram account?
I somehow forgot my login password. I love any assistance you can give me.
@Camden Mayson Instablaster =)
@Jeffery Aarav i really appreciate your reply. I got to the site thru google and im trying it out now.
Seems to take quite some time so I will reply here later with my results.
Thank God for the non scientific world that brought us art and music and other powerful intuitions.
BERLINSKI WANTS FACTS, SCIENCE FACT, HE DOESN'T WANT SOME ONES OPPINION HE WANTS FACTS
No, Berlinski is paid to lie about facts. Life has been evolving for billions of years and that is a fact.
@Michel Martinez
"without scientific evidence when they teach evolution.
And you just lied. There is more than ample evidence. Megatons of fossils, lab tests, field tests and genetic studies. Berlinski just repeats Creationist lies, because that is what he is paid to do.
@@EthelredHardrede-nz8yv who is paying him?
@@Mark-pe2sh
The Discovery Institute.
A formidable intellect. Cheers from New Zealand.
There is nothing intellectual about creationism
A paid liar with training in rhetoric, not science.
@@smaaash94 there’s is nothing intellectual about ignorance am I right?
@@smaaash94 Why not?
@@smaaash94is it intellectual to not not the definition of creationism?
Kinda ironic that a scientist has written his own book to explain this.
Science will never replace my religion or beliefs but instead used to show there is a God and how amazing he is.
H MAX so everything came into being from nothing?
H MAX uhh... no it can’t. That goes against the laws of thermodynamics, because energy is traceable to a beginning. And there is overwhelming evidence of the universe having a beginning. The satellite, WMAP shows a diagram when if put in rewind, the energy retracts and goes to one source.
H MAX literally every scientist should know this, from Neil Degrasse Tyson and Richard Dawkins to The most basic scientists in the field.
H MAX well the requirements are 1.) Needs to be timeless because it created time, 2.) needs to be immaterial because it created matter, 3.) Must be all powerful because it created out of nothing, 4.) Must be intelligent because of the way the universe is designed, and 5.) Must be showing signs of morals because these morals are what drive us to live the way we do. And if you go for the multiverse argument, it would only increase the need significantly. Because the current assumption even though there’s no evidence of the multiverse, is that out of all of the other universes, ours is the only life sustaining one. So this would have to give meaning, and it would also have to be created.
H MAX> There is plenty of evidence of God...just look around you. Everything that man hasn't screwed up is a miracle. For example, with out a Creator, explain how a giant oak tree comes from a tiny acorn? The Universe is so complex and ordered that it couldn't possibly have happened by accident. It is up to you to explain that there is NOT a God. Prove it by creating something from nothing...something that has never been in existence before.
You can't do it....only God can.
This guy has been making the rounds lately. It seems that more and more the "science" and the true "intellectuals" are actually on our side
Science has nothing to say about God directly. It looks for physical explanations for physical events. "God" or "gods" is not an acceptable scientific explanation for physical events because it cannot be tested or verified. Science is not engaged in philosophy either. You are perfectly fine to posit that a god or gods created the universe. You'll just find it hard to write a scientific paper about it. I love how disingenuous Berlinski is - he conflates science with philosophy and goes back and forth between them when it suits his narrative. The fact is their are scientists who believe in god and their are scientists who dont, but science itself as a process of inquiry has nothing empirical to say about either position. Intelligent design cant even say if theres 1 designer, or 1,000,000. How could you SCIENTIFICALLY test that?
David B is legendary, this man has completely humiliated the leading atheist
unless both are correct
ken actually I believe he quoted 1 thing Darwin said that's quite truthful.
when look at the human race the statement
What are we doing here?
We have no Idea.
with all the division among people of the world I can at least give Darwin that one., because u might be together as a race have no clue.
lot of Darwin's other stuff though, if need some LSD to believe it. Probably a lot of it.
Lol David B might sound smart to people who are willing to blindly believe what he says, most other academics think he's a smart dude with some retarted views. One time he was in a debate with a leading evolutionary scientist at Oxford, and apparently the entire audience basically started laughing at David, thoughsaving face, David very strangely pretended they were laughing with him not at him.
ken YES! He is amazing! What's wrong with those who view this and find fault? They are hearing from someone who has an intellect FAR above their's!
meremortal Do you even realize the sheer number of highly intelligent individuals who adamantly disagree with everything this man has said. In fact the vast majority of intelligent people disagree with him. Are you aware of the various debates he’s participated in with individuals who have just demolished him, tail between the leg? If you aren’t, which you clearly are not, then to say something like questioning why they don't blindly believe someone whose “intellect is FAR above their own," only reflects your own naivity on the matter.
Happy to hear this perspective. However, most physicists I know (and I’m studying physics now) are very modest about their understanding of the universe. They’ll all confess there is something mystical about the beauty of what is. Dr. Berlinski is correct in saying scientists don’t know why there is something rather than nothing.
Descartes’ causal ideas are very wonderful to read. The puzzle pieces are not accessible to us yet.
Regan Ross This for the Laurence Krause of the world
Unless I've misinterpreted you, I think you've made a fundamental mistake in understanding Berlinski's point. You say "not accessible to us yet". But the point is that fundamental questions are not accessible to the methods of science at all. Science cannot, in principle, answer questions of meaning because it presumes them; it cannot answer questions of first principles, or "laws of nature", because it presumes them. And what is science doing by positing frictionless planes and idealized conditions that don't actually exist except seeking the nature of things.
To posit that science can answer metaphysical questions--rather than acknowledge science as a tool of ultimately metaphysical quest--is to get the whole thing exactly backward.
@VIII Maus I have no idea how you could have read what I wrote and came up with that understanding.
@@janethockey3297 💩💩💩
Berlinski's anti-evolution stance is not a theory at all. He, nor anyone else from the Christian based Discovery Institute, can explain the laryngeal nerve in the giraffe. They just don't mention it. No one there can explain how a team of true scientists, through a multi-discipline approach, could predict the exact spot of the Tiktaalik, an intermediate species between fish and amphibian that existed 375 million years ago. On the other hand, proponents of Intelligent Design have not offered up anything to our understanding save for the denial of true science, have not offered any prediction that could facilitate a discovery on the level of the Tiktaalik, and have not advanced their own science in any positive direction other than to say that mainstream science is wrong. You can't build a theory on the denial of another theory.
1 Timothy 6:20-21 KJV
[20] O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: [21] Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.
sunia akaveka Amen brother.
Perfect verse. Thank you!
I like that "we can't tell the temp. yet know it all back million yrs." very good
The 10 degrees in a week vs 1 degree in 100 years was one of the more ridiculous things he said in this video. Simply wrong! He's talking about local temp compared to global average(apples vs oranges). David would have pulled him up on this but he's too much of a fraud to do so.
@@Leehamism 25 years ago predictions were made about what the average global temp would be now. They were wrong.
@@scottb4579 does it surprise you that they were wrong?
@@Leehamism No. I learned decades ago scientists are often wrong. They also have been correct about many things, but predicting the future is risky business. Their knowledge isn't perfect, so they can't program computer models to be perfect.
For the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance, he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries.
hmm, you must of been there.
Thomas Aquinas?
Deep State Raccoon did you even read pnp6407 comment or watch the video?
Deep State Raccoon A bitter, miserable, atheist not surprised.
Deep State Raccoon Lol please lol your language and erratic behavior says it all.
david berlinski.....i have big respect to his work.....and i learn true science from him
no you don't
I've been watching and reading Berlin ski for years and he's such a genius. He's definitely a rarity and something special.
I see David B, I click.
i watch 5 mins and LMAO at the idiot and also at Levin who thinks he is the shit lol
@@jojojojo5353 You have aids. Poor thing! 😥
Excellent interview. Dr. Berlinski is worth listening to.
Worth listening to AND reading!
_“Why did the giraffe develop a long neck? Because he wanted to reach leaves at the top of the trees.”_
That’s not Darwinism, that’s a caricature of Lamarckism. A serious critic of Darwin’s should know better.
there's no such thing as a serious critic who is also a creationist.
not a one.
True, although Berlinski claims not to be a creationist. He even denies that he’s an “intelligent design” advocate. Of course, neither of those disavowals prevent him from taking their money or pushing their propaganda.
"True, although Berlinski claims not to be a creationist"
translation:
he lies.
ever watch these clowns when actually put on the stand in a court of law?
it's hilarious.
go check out Behe's testimony during the Kitzmiller v Dover trial.
@Fine-Business Astronaut: A creationist is someone who believes that life and the universe were created by a specific act of divine creation. More precisely -- in the context of this conversation -- a creationist is someone whose objections to evolution are based in religious beliefs.
correction. they are entirely based on nonsense.
creationism is not a religion, it's a mockery of religion.
arguably, it was inevitable given that religion itself is based on nothing more than projecting imagination as reality, but still... it's ridiculous in every aspect.
Science doesn't deal with religion because science is concerned with nature and the natural, Religion by definition is supernatural.
Cats don't rule the world because they don't have opposable thumbs, Berlinski must know that
empty words.
Common sense teaches us to believe in what is innate.
Know common senses teaches us to believe what has evidence.
Evolution is a fact. Republicans must embrace this and move on from there. Evolution does not mean we need to throw away values. These values are not based on fear, as in you will go to hell or be punished by God's curse on your life (aka bad luck) if you do not embrace values. It is Common Law that keeps us lawful, not a God. If you disagree then you haven't done your homework, Our laws came from Cicero's ideas, who, by the way, worshiped Lucifer, a Roman God.
At some point you have to move away from ideas that you thought were correct but are not.....I;ve listened to Levin for a decade. He's a good patriot and inspires liberty, life, and pursuit of happiness, but he's wrong about Evolution.
Evolution is a lie because of evolution society as fused good and evil together making evil sound good and good sound evil example feminist made woman believe woman should be the same this is true but doesnt mean to take away man's manhood
@@vee_da_reaper2350 Evolution is an observed fact and it a fact you need to go to school.
@@undefeateddebater9438 I much prefer an opinion with no facts to someone proclaiming a fact with no proof. Evolution has no proof and, if you’re as intelligent as you want people to believe, you already knew that.
" isn't this a pervasive problem throughout science?"......"to a certain extent" say David, then quickly moves on! Please elaborate to what "extent", please David. Perfect example of wishy washy responses.
In the creation story of the bible God created time and space. Then he separated the sky and earth, separated the land from the water filled the water with fish the sky with birds then created everything needed for life. Thank created animals and created humans in his image. This image is our eternal soul. God transcend the dimension of time and space. God is eternal.
one of thousands of creation myths.
Those who support evolution and/or atheism too often like to paint a stereotype of Christians as low I.Q. science illiterates. At the same time they are smugly convinced that THEY ain't religious. But they are. Profoundly so. Why? Because they have great....faith...in the never seen and even in the impossible. Yet they feel sure they are all about science and that creationists have nothing but an Imaginary Friend.
.
Let's look at just a few of the imaginary friends and myths from evolutionism and atheism. First there is the belief in the imaginary time fairy friend. Evolutionists promote the idea that life can come from inorganic matter. (And don't say they do not. It's easily found all over Google and on YT. Who came up with the mythical primal pond theory? Creationists?) When it is pointed out that all the data shows life only comes from life and life of the same kind they respond "Well, with enough tiiiiime, anything can happen. We have...faith...therefore, that things happened differently in the conveniently invisible past."
.
They have faith, too, in their imaginary crystal ball friend that sees into the unverifiable past. For ex. they will pick up a fossil from a rock and tell you what happened to its invisible and evidenceless descendants for over 100 million Darwin years. They also talk about 'missing' links, more of their imaginary friends. Don't bother to ask how you tell missing links from never existed links. They have...faith...that they are just "missing."
.
Next we see the imaginary Geologic Column friend that "supports" evolution. The real evidence shows the fossils are jumbled. Giant shark fossils are found with dino fossils in Montana, for ex. Whales' fossils are found in wildly improbable places like the Andes mountains and the Sahara desert. Deep sea "Cambrian" fossils are found at every level on the planet, including on most mountain tops, as with the world's highest, the Himalayans. Take a look. Notice the one in the middle, 2nd row, that is an ocean floor dwelling, extinct, trilobite. www.bing.com/images/search?q=Marine+Fossils+On+Mountains&FORM=RESTAB )
.
"Cambrian" fossils, like ocean floor trilobites, are found in the hills of Kentucky and countless other places on the planet, high and far, inland. Etc. Now why do we see evidence of sea life all over the planet at every level? And, how did all that sea get everywhere? Hmmmm....
And btw, oceans don't, and can't, create fossils. Fossils are created when life forms are rapidly buried - so that animals can't eat them and natural forces can't erode them and the chemistry of fossilization can take place. There are no fossils anywhere in the oceans, or even after such things as local floods and tsunamis.
.
Next, there is the imaginary genus-changing fairy friend. Put a species of fish, bird, lizard, tree, bacteria, whatever, under your Darwinian pillow. Voila! Over an evolutionary "night" it will change into the next step up in the Animal (ditto for plants) Kingdom, i.e. a different genus. However, in the real world of trillions of life forms, and throughout recorded history, there is not a single example of any species of fish, bird, lizard, bacteria, tree, or any life form at all, turning into a different genus and stop being a fish, bird, bacteria, tree, etc. Since all the evidence shows that never happens, you just have to have... faith ... that it happened in the unverifiable realm of the ancient past.
.
Then there is the supremely imaginary god-friend of nothingness. Richard Dawkins and others tell us that everything came from nothing. This defies the laws of thermodynamics and physics, not to mention common sense. But their imaginary friend, the nothingness god, sells big time to those who want to believe they can be their own, puny, little gods.
.
Are you willing to take a serious and open minded look outside the box? If nothing else you can hear what the creationists are really saying, not the spin about what they are saying.
.
On this webpage you can see Nobel Prize winning scientists, other secular scientists - including some world famous evolutionists - admitting there is no evidence for evolution. You can see them calling evolution a kind of religion, something that leads to "anti knowledge", etc. Notice how many of these secular scientists acknowledge evidence for a Creator. freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1435562/posts
.
Are you aware that more and more blood cells, blood vessels and soft stretchy materials are being found in dino bones? Forensic science and common sense tell us such things could not last for more than a few thousand years. Go to Genesispark to see ancient art depictions of dinos from around the world. My fave is the stegosaurus carved on a 1,000 year old Cambodian temple. That site has lots of info on soft tissues and blood cells being found in dino bones, and historical reports of dino type creatures, including some from the famous historian Herodotus and from Alexander the Great. All information is gleaned from secular sources. www.genesispark.com/exhibits/evidence/historical/ancient/dinosaur/
.
See Don Patton's The Fossil Record and many others. In this link he uses the fossil record to place evolutionary and creation predictions side by side. You can see for yourself what the real record of the rocks shows: .th-cam.com/video/6qp3oNIRb90/w-d-xo.html
.
Thomas Kindell's vids are great, especially Thermodynamic Evidence For Creation where in the first 10 min. you hear quotes from well known evolutionists like "Evolution is unproven and unprovable. We believe it because the only alternative is special creation and that is unthinkable." th-cam.com/video/I1yto0-z2bQ/w-d-xo.html
.
Wazooloo vids, particularly The Mathematical Impossibility of Evolution and So Ya Think Yer A Chimp, and the DNA ones, are full of scientific fact presented in an often humorous way. Also see Wazooloo's refutation of Aaron Ra's 8th Foundational Falsehood of Creationism to see how evo. supporters make big claims but give out lots of false "information" and sloppy "research." th-cam.com/video/mjQtqg3yyjkh/w-d-xo.htmlttps://th-cam.com/video/9ZHrcy8l9cU/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/plnwMNBm9z4/w-d-xo.html
.
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed shows the politics of Neo Darwinism which harasses and expels those in academia and the media who even hint that there MIGHT be evidence for a Creator. th-cam.com/video/4HErmp5Pzqw/w-d-xo.html
.
Physicist Dr. Russell Humphreys gives scientific evidences for why people believe in a young, yes young, earth. Check it out and see: th-cam.com/video/tX9eDTNfQHY/w-d-xo.html Part 1 And regarding the speed of light "problem", there are many unproven assumptions about light. It was always assumed, for instance, that the speed of light was constant. Now some secular scientists are saying it is slowing down. However, here is another perspective. We have found that space, as in outer space, is stretchy. Several times in the Bible we are told that the Almighty stretched out the Heavens. This would mean the light from stars got stretched out, too, thus creating a false impression of distant time for light travel.
.
Answersingenesis.org covers just about everything
.
You are not a goo through the zoo ape update. You were created in the image and likeness of the Almighty Creator Who loves you. Why are you trading in those astounding truths of who you are for pseudoscience fairy tales and imaginary friends? Rhetorical Q.
That was really funny. Do people of faith find that nonsense real?
Notice something missing from your post: Science. Your post is typical of too many YT evolution supporters because it does not even mention the scientific data that has been presented, much less attempt to refute it. In fact, it says nothing based on science whatsoever. It is also typical in that you feel free to be nasty and insulting to another poster simply because that person disagrees with you.
.
I have seen over and over that while such posters want to be considered big time science defenders, they never do say anything based on observable, scientific, data. However, with any further exchanges their irrelevant verbal abuse escalates. Therefore you are now on mute. I wish you well and have prayed for you, however. You mind was...created...for so much more. Bye!
Lorica Lass I like how you are able to genuinely equate your 8 paragraphs of drivel as "science." Here's what you do in basically all your comments: you name a person, and then say "this person is smart and thinks evolution is a myth, so haha you're all wrong." If I searched hard enough I could probably find someone who thinks 9/11 was a good thing to happen to the country. Yet, we consider that person wrong because the overwhelming majority of people, as well as data surrounding the event, refute it. So while I'm sure there's a handful of people, maybe even some smart people, that think the Earth is Young, global warming is bs, and evolution is a myth, there is such an overwhelming supply of intelligent scientists, records, weather patterns, and carbon dating that tell us these socalled "smart people" are wrong, that to cling so tightly to a clearly defunct fictional theory is nothing short of delusional.
Congratulations on your courage to address this issue, which few understand, but which lies at the very center of man's existence. Those who choose God ... by and large ... live positive, purposeful lives powered by hope beyond this short span of life. Those who deny God start and end with pointless lives, without hope or purpose, and a tendency towards all things negative. As God has so eloquently put it ...
HEBREWS 4:12 King James Version
"For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart." And consequentially to the life that flows from that inner condition.
LOVEANDOBEY nice. I just would like to see atheist admit to what you say. I would have more respect for them if they would admit that.
Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks” Psalm 137:9
The 9/11 terrorists believed vehemently in God. Did they also have such positive fulfilling lives?
Gods word when read just resonates within me unlike any other because it’s alive or living and those writing it were inspired by God. Thanks for sharing.
He should of done 2 hrs! Great conversation!😉👍
I’m looking for the talk Levin had re: climate change. It was an older video. Can anyone help me find it, pls?
8:00... Levin: and some climate scientists also ... Berkinski: interrupting.. I was talking about top physicists .. for climate scientists you have to go all the way down the ladder :) lol
So true, great comment!
@Johnny Casteel before you say something about mental damage make sure you can spell, 'severe.' Just saying!!!
Recent graduates from Universities around the world within the last 10-20 years are some of the most indoctrinated, group-think minds, orchestrated for years by the progressive, so-called “academic” left. College is no longer a place for learning or intellectual discussion, nor for challenging ingrained, pervasive, institutional orthodoxy. Neither are they laboratories for the advancement of science, for the advancement of science itself NECESSARILY requires free & bold challenge to currently held belief systems. And that is no longer permitted on today’s liberal progressive campuses. Foolishly unaware of the contradictory nature of the following statement, you will frequently hear professors confidently pronounce the most ANTI-SCIENCE sentence ever uttered, “The Science Is Settled”.
i don't think science is trying to give meaning or make any presuppositions. They develop theories based on empirical evidence. science just one of many tools. Just being open ti being wrong based on new evidence is the biggest strength of science.
Sometimes I feel like a cosmic accident. Sometimes I feel like a cosmic train wreck.
Science means evidence which makes you smarter. Therefore if science leads to progressivism then Progressives are smarter.
Love David Berlinsky! He is an honest scientist. He simply refuses to make scientific leaps of faith to atheism.
honest. LOL
the man erects an army of strawmen, and YOU call that honest.
what a maroon.
All religions and religious books are man-made. Live and let live.
how can you live and let live without knowing right and wrong? that which comes from religion and religious books.
@@Chineseguy001 You can live a highly ethical life without believing in any religion.
(6:27) Excellent point.
Mark, please do an interview with Ben Stein!!!
Never seen such closed minded intellectuals
secular scientists make belief that they have all the answers mixed with half proven theories and pushing it as hard science for personal recognition. Lets not go down that rabbit hole. I have many reason to be sceptical about a lot of things that gets published.
When a philosopher denies science.
It's very easy to ascribe motivations to evolution, "The animal evolved this way because it served some purpose for it." I've done it myself sometimes, when I'm being rather lazy. However, those who think about evolution in a disciplined way see it as the result of processes, not motivations. The giraffe doesn't grow a long neck because "It wanted to reach the tops of trees." Its changing traits, from generation to generation, developed it to have a long neck, and *as a result*, in its foraging behavior, it found it could reach the tops of trees, and exploited that ability, which gave it some advantage, such that the collection of traits that enabled that physical development were passed along to enough offspring that the collection of traits survived.
Current evolutionary theory ascribes no control over either an organism's own physical development, nor of its progeny, upon which the process is acting.
You can't separate process from motivation
The variations involved in evolution are not always gradual, in fact they are not patterned.
On the giraffe thing, it just demonstrates gheir ignorance onnthe topic. Giraffes evolved long necks for high browsing, among other minor things, it wasn't a choicem they didn't choose it, but that aside, they developed this adaptation as no other organisms were taking this niche in their ecosystems, and once they have taken that role, no other animals in their enviroment will as there will be competition among them. But long necks have evolved in different lineages across time, such as the sauropod dinosaurs, camels in ancient florida, etc.
An interesting talk, but I come back to his question of what is our purpose? My response is: why do we have to a have a purpose?
Berlinski is brilliant!!
Why is it cut short?
Intelligent design. Evolution is concious change for desired purpose done in the spiritual plane outside of the physical, the physical is a symptom of the energetic. Dont scientific oriented minds among the public get that its beautiful to not understand the awe of probability for dna to exist as organized code? You can put aside all religeons but remember there is an intelligence to existance itself, and you are it as well and it supports you. Purpose is the key word. All will be revealed to humans in time. But we are beginning to ask the right questions.
Humanism things about morality. Science is uninvolved as morality is not reality, just the current thinking about what's right vs. wrong. We've loved genocide and slavery in the past, both supported by all the major religious texts, but rejected by humanism and it's saner morality. Science finds evidence and makes predictions that can be tested.
When you die, that's it. There's nothing. There's no reason to believe otherwise.
You're at the top of these intellectual physicist. David should have mentioned you.
It's actually called "The Origin of Species, and the Master Race."
No, it’s not.
One way=yahshua. Only one that can save.
This guy is refreshing. Guys like this are just not heard. Nice to they exist.
No point trying to answer someone's post on you tube it never comes up , does anyone else have this problem ?
This is awesome discussion. It hits at the center of the culture we live with today and attempt to stir-up discussion answer the most basic of questions like how did progressive get here? What shapes their beliefs? How come they don't realize how stupid some of their choices are?
how come conservatives never realize how much they project?
@@thomasneal9291 I am sorry that you have aids.
wheres the complete vídeo🤔
Neither progressives nor conservatives tolerate each other. It's a classic win/lose zero sum game. At least that's what I'm aware of now.
Science doesn't cannot deal with ultimate causes.
The controversy was settled 50 years ago with Synergetics by Richard Buckminster Fuller. Published in 1975 Fuller examined quantum mechanics and Creationism which worked together throughout the Universe. "Sunergei" is the Greek word for working together. President Reagan recognized Fuller's pioneering genius and awarded Bucky the Medal Of Freedom in 1983.
Reagan is not a scientist, neither was Buckminster, all it takes is a quick Google search.
Thank you for your intellectual courage and brilliance, David!
How much courage is involved in a failed academic lying and sneering at his betters? He has contributed nothing to any branch of any science at any time and can only sit helplessly on the sidelines sniping and lying and sneering while he poses as an authority on subjects where he is cluless......where's the courage?
Wow, this is God of the gaps! I don't know, therefore God. This guys nuts, giraffes have long necks to get the leaves because the elephants ate all the lower ones. He even makes up gaps, lol.
When the older generation dies, these primitive ideas will be lost to time.
Is there an "intelligent" basis for science? Is there an "intelligent" basis for evolution? Is there an "intelligent" basis for the scientific method? Do they have "purpose"? Do they have "meaning"? They would have to or else they wouldn't exist. Yet "life" has no "purpose" or "meaning" or "intelligent" basis which drives it? Then "what" exactly is science trying to "solve", and on what "basis"? Does the notion that there is an "intelligent" basis for a life which has "purpose" and "meaning" enhance the scientific process or hurt it?...
Now, if pushing unproven scientific explanations about the existence of the Universe sounds crazy, using God as its explanation sounds crazier -God or the Gods, the most pushed idea in human history.
I clicked on this to hear an esteemed thinker give some logical arguments on evolution, science and progressivism. Levine always has great guests and so many people here seem to respect Berlinski...who I've never heard of.
Just to come clean, I am a staunch conservative who detests the new progressivism, but I totally accept evolution and the science behind it. I have eight college years of hard science, biology, chemistry, physics etc. After watching this short video...what a disappointment. Frankly I couldn't believe my ears. "A giraffe developed a long neck because he wanted to reach the leaves on the top of trees."? Really? "A small animal did not develop a long neck, kept eating low hanging leaves, because he didn't want to eat the leaves at the top"??? Are you serious? If this is his best argument against evolution....well I'll stop here because I do not want to insult anyone. But Wow! How about considering that the success of each different species depended on developing their own successful niche.
He makes a very good point in saying that even atheists need to have the comfort of a belief.
How many agnostics here? Voted for Trump.
You don't have to worry about weather the predictions are correct .. the NOW shows that the earth has warmed and that the the last ten years or so have been the warmest on record. which is a FACT not a prediction.
Would have been great if they had invited Lawrence Krauss to rebuttle.
You've bumped your head.
@@1974jrod huh?
@@elmhurst86 Lawrence Krauss is a bafoon.
@@1974jrod why?
@@elmhurst86 because that is the conclusion I've drawn by listening to about 15 hrs of his debates and lectures. He argues devoid of any evidence. He argues based on that he is a scientist, therefore he is right.
David isn't ignorant but he knows Levin and the audience are. Does he believe his own dribble, is it simply a con to make cash or is it some combination of the two?
Why hasn't the supernatural deity provided us with an uncorruptable government chartering system?
This guy is brilliant.
Really not. He creates straw men and makes vague, broadly-sweeping comments that sound semi-intelligent.
"This guy is brilliant."
nope, it's really just that you're quite gullible and ignorant.
avoid people who want to sell you bridges. trust me.
Thomas Neal LOL. OK bud.
see? you cannot even question my description of you.
now, I have several bridges you might be interested in purchasing.
Thomas Neal LOLz
Wanna know why evolution dominates the college departments...?
Follow the money!!! 💰 💰 💰
Or...better still follow the science. Evolution dominates the life sciences for the same reason the atomic theory of matter or the germ theory of disease dominate elsewhere.
Can you cite a few evolutionary biologists that you've actually read?
@@mcmanustony
"Follow the science" is silly.
Science doesn't 'go anywhere.'
Follow the scientists and their worldview would be better.
@@eswn1816 No, it wouldn't be better- this is just a lazy nonsense. Does evolutionary
I doubt you could name half a dozen of the tens of thousands of evolutionary biologists out there, whose work you've read if your life depended on it. You're nothing more than a pig-ignorant, lying smear merchant. You have ZERO evidence of any "following of money".
Try to crawl out of your sewer and learn some science....
you may have deleted your idiotic comment about James Tour. Just to bring you up to speed. Tour is a lying fanatic who does not work in Origin of Life research and has been repeatedly exposed lying about scientists- Prof Jack Szostak for example- who do.
Try to be better than this- an ignorant lying smear merchant who knows precisely NOTHING about the relevant science.
The smell is better in the clean world......
Do you have evidence to falsify evolution? Berlinski certainly doesn’t. how about you? Is this ignorant sneer as good as it gets?
Theories on the origin of the universe are all over the place, and none are testable. Still that does not mean that the explanation will be made clear by the interjection of a god, or some sort of sentience with a mission. Truth is all that matters for me, and it must be self-evident. The extreme distance of the furthest galaxies makes me wonder even if the big bang theory has full merit. The universe may simply be infinite in age.
What a load on nonsense!! Levin is dangerous right-wing nut job and most of his guests are dishonest charlatans.
And the progressive fall-back position finally appears, sophomoric name calling without intellectual discussion.
Take the jump David
People are finding out prayers or invisible emails just dont work
David Heller What a sad way to exist.
David Heller The Apostle Paul prayed 3 times and asked for a thorn (a physical issue) to be removed from his flesh but it wasn't, Paul knew there was a reason for everything somethings and circumstances teach us lessons or build character and perseverance and we don't always get exactly what we want, but God has a plan and gives us what we need (IF WE LIVE ACCORDING TO HIS WILL.)
jinitron Lol you're literally trash, lol do you hear the anger and bitterness in the language you use? Your hate and bitterness reminds me why I'm a Christian because hopelessness is incredibly empty and sad, Lol and you dare to question my attitude and morality???
jinitron Lol hilariously sad playlist lol you think TYT is real news lol gross sad.
Street epistemology for the win
Where’s a loose light to fall on Levon’s head when you need it"
sounds like you're perilously close to asking for divine intervention.
Evolution precludes catastrophism.
Better Left Unsaid
The Jew Levin talks with the Jew Berlinsky who locates the triumph of a religiously intolerant scientism in the last 30 years without talking about the Jew Freud who began the process of pathologizing religious belief at the beginning of the last century with his own pseudo-science in such works as "The Future Of An Illusion."
a philsopher is just a scientist without the science
Berlinski is a charlatan.
Science is a language and technique that we use to discern the nature of the phenomena by which we are surrounded. It has nothing to do with religion one way or the other. It does not investigate questions about God. It works in the area of the natural only, and has nothing to do with, or say about, the supernatural. Religion seems more to be an epiphenomenon of human consciousness, and has more to do with the emotions than with the brute facts of the world of reality being explored by science. The fact that a majority of people engaged in the sciences are of atheist or agnostical bent is a sociological phenomenon, one that is of interest to some philosophers, but not all. And so only to those can the existence or nonexistence of God be a philosophical question..
I've heard Berlinski a number of times, and I am somewhat of a new fan, and it's probably me, but he is just not connecting w/ me here.
could be because he's a complete fraud.
Yes,that old chestnut from Leibnitz again: why is there something rather than nothing. Why is there anything at all?
I think this guy majored in double talk.
I'm so relieved there isn't an atheist troll here talking about the 'Flying Spaghetti Monster'.
@I Z Needless to say, you trolls always show up.