California Screamin' (2001) vs Incredicoaster (2024, Non Copyright) POV comparison

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 72

  • @510cristian4
    @510cristian4 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    i honestly miss california screaming just because it was the first rollercoasters i’ve ever been on, i remember my dad making me go on it i went in crying and came out with a smile on my face and my love for roller coasters/rides started there

    • @idiot_studios_animation
      @idiot_studios_animation 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's the same thing that happened to me!

    • @1saamor897
      @1saamor897 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      bruh stop missing coasters 💀

    • @510cristian4
      @510cristian4 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@1saamor897 outta here

    • @RobloxAndToilets
      @RobloxAndToilets 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@1saamor897 shut up let him express his feelings >:(

  • @Calfornia_Coasters
    @Calfornia_Coasters 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    The kick of the older LIMs felt a lot quicker than it is now

    • @ejectorseatcoasters
      @ejectorseatcoasters  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yeah it sure did! I remember riding back in 2016 and it did feel more powerful. And at my home park, SFGAm, V2 still uses the old LIMs and I also feel that the start of the launch is much more powerful. Plus, at the start it probably doesn't even hit the speed that Incredicoaster goes.

  • @shaun4591
    @shaun4591 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    The scream tunnels were extended to create more "darkness" for the showscene figures. Gives the illusion of going faster but it's the same ride system.

  • @Legos-u1v
    @Legos-u1v 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    Is it just me or does incredicoaster now break down more than when it was california screamin cause the times i went to disneyland when it was california screamin it only broken down once in the entire trip, but when I went with the refurbishment and i just gone on it this week it broke down at least 5 times every day and it was for almost 3 hours down. Loved it more when it was california screamin less of a wait to ride. Oh and nice video btw.

    • @ejectorseatcoasters
      @ejectorseatcoasters  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Yeah, I don't seem to recall California Screamin' breaking down at all the day I was there when I was 8. As I was about to get my 10th ride on Incredicoaster, it shut down for the rest of the night and people were stuck on the launch. And I agree, Incredicoaster had over an hour wait the day I was there so I had to spam the single rider line lol!

    • @fxsupermaster
      @fxsupermaster 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      that is probably because there is more people wanting to ride it per day now. Like you said, "less of a wait to ride", theres more people visiting disney parks nowadays than in the 1990s and 2000s and maybe this ride can't handle the amount of people coming 🤷‍♂🤷‍♂ idk

    • @adventuresinsplashmountain6
      @adventuresinsplashmountain6 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      No its not just you. The Incredicoaster is just stupid

    • @1ronEntertainment
      @1ronEntertainment 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’m actually glad you mentioned it. Every comment here has an incorrect theory. Disney maintenance has just been slacking recently. Nothing to do with rides or more ppl wanting to ride, since the capacity it operated at is the same. Lots of rides have been broken recently. That’s why I stopped going to DL

    • @genappithy
      @genappithy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It was a younger ride when it was screamin’. It’s getting older and more unreliable

  • @thedoctor4637
    @thedoctor4637 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Screamin’ soundtrack was awesome!

  • @mynameiskrysta
    @mynameiskrysta 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +135

    I dont trust comparing the speed of two coaster videos, completely imperceptible skipped frames can drastically change the speed of a video and there’s a lot of room for that in a video that’s been uploaded to youtube, downloaded, edited, and reuploaded to youtube
    Edit: not to mention the differences between how standardized cameras are now vs in 2001

    • @SlushysSecret
      @SlushysSecret 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      But Screamin in 2001 did go faster because the break runs weren’t as strong as they are now

    • @WoWUndad
      @WoWUndad 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      wtf is wrong with you schizo its literally the exact same roller coaster and youre trying to dispute microseconds

    • @FK_TRUMP
      @FK_TRUMP 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      True

    • @olympicbuilder-JHKimaginnering
      @olympicbuilder-JHKimaginnering 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Also depending on how
      Many train is running and how crowded the park it at the moment.

    • @mynameiskrysta
      @mynameiskrysta 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@olympicbuilder-JHKimaginnering neither of those would change the speed of the coaster.

  • @ryanc.3372
    @ryanc.3372 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The ride ran faster 2001-2006. After a train in 2006 slipped the break zone before the final helix and bumped a train in the final break run, magnetic trims were added to the ride at : 1:15 and 1:41. The loop used to be much more intense and the bunny hills use to give strong air-time.

    • @donuts-df8on
      @donuts-df8on 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      i did notice that in the video that Increadicoaster got trim-breaked more during the last part

    • @bleepiestofbloops
      @bleepiestofbloops 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's interesting! My first ride would have been when it was faster, and it had me sidelined for at least 30 minutes after the ride. I never had an issue when I rode it more often after '06 and thought it was more chill than I remembered. Maybe this did it.

  • @1saamor897
    @1saamor897 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    i actually thought it was slower before on Screamin. and personally i think the theme and music makes the ride more “alive”.

  • @gaogaenssb5737
    @gaogaenssb5737 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    2024 is slower toward the end cause of some added trim brakes you can see in the right hand shot @1:40 ish

  • @dindog22
    @dindog22 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    looks like they added some trim brakes in the final third of the ride

    • @heavenandhello6629
      @heavenandhello6629 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That was added wayyyy before the ride became incredicoaster though.

    • @richardespinoza2839
      @richardespinoza2839 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      they were added in I believe 2005 after a train was rear ended, Disney did add a new safety mechanism after that but they opted to use the trim brakes instead

  • @Tortoise1Plaz
    @Tortoise1Plaz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The launches can differ how long the train waits there we can’t trust that

  • @S.K.R.E.Inc.
    @S.K.R.E.Inc. 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    They should have made Pixar its own land and not retheme one, would have fit perfectly in between Hollywood Pictures backlot and Cars Land. Brings back memories and my inner critique seeing the comparison

    • @Sticky_sausage69
      @Sticky_sausage69 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah and they could try to put Monsters Inc. in it only thing would be they might have to get rid of Mission Breakout

  • @63fahrenheit
    @63fahrenheit 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Looks like it went faster before, but the breaking sections slowed it down more temporarily?

    • @ejectorseatcoasters
      @ejectorseatcoasters  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      It looked like it was slower in 2001 up until the bunny hills, mainly because of the 2005 incident where 2 trains collided on the final brake run and they had to really slow down the ride from there

  • @02_valkyrie
    @02_valkyrie 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Idk if it was faster but it was definitely more jarring back then. I went in 2003 and the starting propulsion actually gave me a minor injury in my neck. (I was 12 at the time)

    • @ejectorseatcoasters
      @ejectorseatcoasters  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Getting even just a minor injury on a coaster sounds pretty rough, but from what I experienced when I went on this ride in 2016 (I was almost 8 at the time) I did feel a bit more of a kick on the launch. I'm not sure if it was more jarring back in 2003 because I did not exist during this time, however I do have some family members that rode this during its early years.

    • @adventuresinsplashmountain6
      @adventuresinsplashmountain6 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Back in the early years of this coaster it was pretty jarring from what I heard. But in 2005, there was a serious accident where 2 trains collided at the very end of the ride sending 15 riders to the emergency room. And that was a pretty big deal, so they did have to slow it down just a little bit

  • @xbox07
    @xbox07 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I remember going on california screamin' when i was 6, because i got lost after i got off the ride and thought that the best way to find my mom again was to scrounge for coins and then call her on the payphones at the exit to the ride. At the same time however, I don't think they would have let a 6 year old ride by themselves in 2013...

  • @VestedUTuber
    @VestedUTuber 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    This ride really doesn't benefit from the retheme. It removes some of the suspense from the launch by having a countdown and while the original felt like it was designed to resemble a classic wooden coaster, the new Incredibles theming just feels tacked on.

  • @ilikerollercoasters4757
    @ilikerollercoasters4757 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    It honestly seems to be running exactly the same as it did when it was new.

    • @heavenandhello6629
      @heavenandhello6629 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Actually no, because when the coaster was california screamin, the motors that the ride was using were LIM (Linear Induction Motors) and when they changed it to the incredicoaster, they changed the motors to LSM (Linear Synchronous Motor)

  • @jumbo6498
    @jumbo6498 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    To be back in 2001 again.

  • @arielperez3613
    @arielperez3613 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The maliboomer was way better than the boring inside out attraction

  • @vmanila5096
    @vmanila5096 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    California Screamin’ - FASTER!!! Incredicoaster got slower.

  • @Lepewplayzz
    @Lepewplayzz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It’s the same speed

  • @frankthecat1660
    @frankthecat1660 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Still boring!

  • @SMGW64
    @SMGW64 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Worst intamin ever. Yes even worse than the zac spins