i honestly miss california screaming just because it was the first rollercoasters i’ve ever been on, i remember my dad making me go on it i went in crying and came out with a smile on my face and my love for roller coasters/rides started there
Yeah it sure did! I remember riding back in 2016 and it did feel more powerful. And at my home park, SFGAm, V2 still uses the old LIMs and I also feel that the start of the launch is much more powerful. Plus, at the start it probably doesn't even hit the speed that Incredicoaster goes.
The scream tunnels were extended to create more "darkness" for the showscene figures. Gives the illusion of going faster but it's the same ride system.
Is it just me or does incredicoaster now break down more than when it was california screamin cause the times i went to disneyland when it was california screamin it only broken down once in the entire trip, but when I went with the refurbishment and i just gone on it this week it broke down at least 5 times every day and it was for almost 3 hours down. Loved it more when it was california screamin less of a wait to ride. Oh and nice video btw.
Yeah, I don't seem to recall California Screamin' breaking down at all the day I was there when I was 8. As I was about to get my 10th ride on Incredicoaster, it shut down for the rest of the night and people were stuck on the launch. And I agree, Incredicoaster had over an hour wait the day I was there so I had to spam the single rider line lol!
that is probably because there is more people wanting to ride it per day now. Like you said, "less of a wait to ride", theres more people visiting disney parks nowadays than in the 1990s and 2000s and maybe this ride can't handle the amount of people coming 🤷♂🤷♂ idk
I’m actually glad you mentioned it. Every comment here has an incorrect theory. Disney maintenance has just been slacking recently. Nothing to do with rides or more ppl wanting to ride, since the capacity it operated at is the same. Lots of rides have been broken recently. That’s why I stopped going to DL
I dont trust comparing the speed of two coaster videos, completely imperceptible skipped frames can drastically change the speed of a video and there’s a lot of room for that in a video that’s been uploaded to youtube, downloaded, edited, and reuploaded to youtube Edit: not to mention the differences between how standardized cameras are now vs in 2001
The ride ran faster 2001-2006. After a train in 2006 slipped the break zone before the final helix and bumped a train in the final break run, magnetic trims were added to the ride at : 1:15 and 1:41. The loop used to be much more intense and the bunny hills use to give strong air-time.
That's interesting! My first ride would have been when it was faster, and it had me sidelined for at least 30 minutes after the ride. I never had an issue when I rode it more often after '06 and thought it was more chill than I remembered. Maybe this did it.
they were added in I believe 2005 after a train was rear ended, Disney did add a new safety mechanism after that but they opted to use the trim brakes instead
They should have made Pixar its own land and not retheme one, would have fit perfectly in between Hollywood Pictures backlot and Cars Land. Brings back memories and my inner critique seeing the comparison
It looked like it was slower in 2001 up until the bunny hills, mainly because of the 2005 incident where 2 trains collided on the final brake run and they had to really slow down the ride from there
Idk if it was faster but it was definitely more jarring back then. I went in 2003 and the starting propulsion actually gave me a minor injury in my neck. (I was 12 at the time)
Getting even just a minor injury on a coaster sounds pretty rough, but from what I experienced when I went on this ride in 2016 (I was almost 8 at the time) I did feel a bit more of a kick on the launch. I'm not sure if it was more jarring back in 2003 because I did not exist during this time, however I do have some family members that rode this during its early years.
Back in the early years of this coaster it was pretty jarring from what I heard. But in 2005, there was a serious accident where 2 trains collided at the very end of the ride sending 15 riders to the emergency room. And that was a pretty big deal, so they did have to slow it down just a little bit
I remember going on california screamin' when i was 6, because i got lost after i got off the ride and thought that the best way to find my mom again was to scrounge for coins and then call her on the payphones at the exit to the ride. At the same time however, I don't think they would have let a 6 year old ride by themselves in 2013...
This ride really doesn't benefit from the retheme. It removes some of the suspense from the launch by having a countdown and while the original felt like it was designed to resemble a classic wooden coaster, the new Incredibles theming just feels tacked on.
Actually no, because when the coaster was california screamin, the motors that the ride was using were LIM (Linear Induction Motors) and when they changed it to the incredicoaster, they changed the motors to LSM (Linear Synchronous Motor)
i honestly miss california screaming just because it was the first rollercoasters i’ve ever been on, i remember my dad making me go on it i went in crying and came out with a smile on my face and my love for roller coasters/rides started there
That's the same thing that happened to me!
bruh stop missing coasters 💀
@@1saamor897 outta here
@@1saamor897 shut up let him express his feelings >:(
The kick of the older LIMs felt a lot quicker than it is now
Yeah it sure did! I remember riding back in 2016 and it did feel more powerful. And at my home park, SFGAm, V2 still uses the old LIMs and I also feel that the start of the launch is much more powerful. Plus, at the start it probably doesn't even hit the speed that Incredicoaster goes.
The scream tunnels were extended to create more "darkness" for the showscene figures. Gives the illusion of going faster but it's the same ride system.
Is it just me or does incredicoaster now break down more than when it was california screamin cause the times i went to disneyland when it was california screamin it only broken down once in the entire trip, but when I went with the refurbishment and i just gone on it this week it broke down at least 5 times every day and it was for almost 3 hours down. Loved it more when it was california screamin less of a wait to ride. Oh and nice video btw.
Yeah, I don't seem to recall California Screamin' breaking down at all the day I was there when I was 8. As I was about to get my 10th ride on Incredicoaster, it shut down for the rest of the night and people were stuck on the launch. And I agree, Incredicoaster had over an hour wait the day I was there so I had to spam the single rider line lol!
that is probably because there is more people wanting to ride it per day now. Like you said, "less of a wait to ride", theres more people visiting disney parks nowadays than in the 1990s and 2000s and maybe this ride can't handle the amount of people coming 🤷♂🤷♂ idk
No its not just you. The Incredicoaster is just stupid
I’m actually glad you mentioned it. Every comment here has an incorrect theory. Disney maintenance has just been slacking recently. Nothing to do with rides or more ppl wanting to ride, since the capacity it operated at is the same. Lots of rides have been broken recently. That’s why I stopped going to DL
It was a younger ride when it was screamin’. It’s getting older and more unreliable
Screamin’ soundtrack was awesome!
I dont trust comparing the speed of two coaster videos, completely imperceptible skipped frames can drastically change the speed of a video and there’s a lot of room for that in a video that’s been uploaded to youtube, downloaded, edited, and reuploaded to youtube
Edit: not to mention the differences between how standardized cameras are now vs in 2001
But Screamin in 2001 did go faster because the break runs weren’t as strong as they are now
wtf is wrong with you schizo its literally the exact same roller coaster and youre trying to dispute microseconds
True
Also depending on how
Many train is running and how crowded the park it at the moment.
@@olympicbuilder-JHKimaginnering neither of those would change the speed of the coaster.
The ride ran faster 2001-2006. After a train in 2006 slipped the break zone before the final helix and bumped a train in the final break run, magnetic trims were added to the ride at : 1:15 and 1:41. The loop used to be much more intense and the bunny hills use to give strong air-time.
i did notice that in the video that Increadicoaster got trim-breaked more during the last part
That's interesting! My first ride would have been when it was faster, and it had me sidelined for at least 30 minutes after the ride. I never had an issue when I rode it more often after '06 and thought it was more chill than I remembered. Maybe this did it.
i actually thought it was slower before on Screamin. and personally i think the theme and music makes the ride more “alive”.
2024 is slower toward the end cause of some added trim brakes you can see in the right hand shot @1:40 ish
looks like they added some trim brakes in the final third of the ride
That was added wayyyy before the ride became incredicoaster though.
they were added in I believe 2005 after a train was rear ended, Disney did add a new safety mechanism after that but they opted to use the trim brakes instead
The launches can differ how long the train waits there we can’t trust that
They should have made Pixar its own land and not retheme one, would have fit perfectly in between Hollywood Pictures backlot and Cars Land. Brings back memories and my inner critique seeing the comparison
Yeah and they could try to put Monsters Inc. in it only thing would be they might have to get rid of Mission Breakout
Looks like it went faster before, but the breaking sections slowed it down more temporarily?
It looked like it was slower in 2001 up until the bunny hills, mainly because of the 2005 incident where 2 trains collided on the final brake run and they had to really slow down the ride from there
Idk if it was faster but it was definitely more jarring back then. I went in 2003 and the starting propulsion actually gave me a minor injury in my neck. (I was 12 at the time)
Getting even just a minor injury on a coaster sounds pretty rough, but from what I experienced when I went on this ride in 2016 (I was almost 8 at the time) I did feel a bit more of a kick on the launch. I'm not sure if it was more jarring back in 2003 because I did not exist during this time, however I do have some family members that rode this during its early years.
Back in the early years of this coaster it was pretty jarring from what I heard. But in 2005, there was a serious accident where 2 trains collided at the very end of the ride sending 15 riders to the emergency room. And that was a pretty big deal, so they did have to slow it down just a little bit
I remember going on california screamin' when i was 6, because i got lost after i got off the ride and thought that the best way to find my mom again was to scrounge for coins and then call her on the payphones at the exit to the ride. At the same time however, I don't think they would have let a 6 year old ride by themselves in 2013...
This ride really doesn't benefit from the retheme. It removes some of the suspense from the launch by having a countdown and while the original felt like it was designed to resemble a classic wooden coaster, the new Incredibles theming just feels tacked on.
It honestly seems to be running exactly the same as it did when it was new.
Actually no, because when the coaster was california screamin, the motors that the ride was using were LIM (Linear Induction Motors) and when they changed it to the incredicoaster, they changed the motors to LSM (Linear Synchronous Motor)
To be back in 2001 again.
Especially in new york
The maliboomer was way better than the boring inside out attraction
California Screamin’ - FASTER!!! Incredicoaster got slower.
It’s the same speed
Still boring!
Worst intamin ever. Yes even worse than the zac spins