My teacher is making me watch like 4 videos [I assume all around 5 minutes long], and then doing a bunch of questions. Pretty boring, but I'm doing it right now
The video is talking about the Lw of Conservation of mass which basically tells us that mass can not change( increase or decrease) in an enclosed space. For example, let's say we put baking soda inside a balloon and put that balloon over a flask that already had vinegar inside. When the baking soda falls and creates a reaction with the vinegar there will be little to no decrease or increase in mass as the atoms are not able to disperse. The only reason the mass can change is if the atoms have dispersed but in an enclosed space there is no room for the atoms disperse, hence the reason for the lack of change in mass. I may be wrong but that is what I got from the video also the example is not provided in the video, it is an experiment that my school used to teach us this phenomenon so you may not want to use that! Hope this helps!
Yeah he doesn't spell out the part about what he means about man is being energy and matter. This is a very irritating bad habit whatever words you use what you need to say is that depending upon the arrangement it's going to change its weight. As some of the mass turns into energy the amount of mass that is attracted gravitationally to the Earth is reduced. Now I understand that some people believe that if this container prevents a infrared or just flight from getting out then the light will attract the Box to the Earth the heat in there. In other words this is hard for people to understand because the narrator has a script that accidentally or deliberately tries to keep this fact Secret. Historically the loss of mass that happens when you freeze water for example has been hidden from late Observers buy the expansion of the water into ice explaining why it floats. It would float even if it took up the same amount of space or slightly less. Liquid water has added weight per molecule because of the Heat that you have to add to ice to make it liquid. The weight of energy is of course easily solved for by dividing the equation Buy what's the variable for energy to remove it from the left side and then multiplying by m which replaces that e for energy with the m for Mass. So that means that on the right side of the equation you have M squared multiplied times c squared the speed of light and then of course you have to know what the units are as someone recently did the math for to prove what I am saying to be false but only in his mind.
Nothing exploded, and that the thing. The Big Bang is not an explosion of matter moving outward to fill an empty universe. Instead, space itself expands with time everywhere and increases the physical distance between two comoving points. In other words, the Big Bang is not an explosion in space, but rather an expansion of space.
No shit sherlock! The big bang is more accurately described as "the everywhere stretch". I'm saying If matter and energy can't be created, then what caused all that energy to come into existance?
Levshu Whovian The total amount of the Universe is actually zero, so no energy was ever need to "come into existence". There's a thing called negative energy, you know. This theory, the Zero-energy universe theory, states that the total energy in Universe is actually counteracted with negative potential energy. Since potential energy always is negative, it cancels out the positive energy.
Do you have evidence that this "negative energy universe" exists? or is it just another thing someone made up to try to make sense of the contradicting nature of out universe? Also, what caused our universe to come into existence along with the negative energy to counteract it? or do objects at rest tend to stay at rest unless they happen to be a universe, in which case all bets are off.
Levshu Whovian Really, "energy" itself does not really exist at all, but is rather the integral of the force with respect to the distance which the force acts.
Can’t understand the video for the life of you? Well then, I’ve got your back. No matter what you do to mass, wether it be a chemical or physical change, the amount of mass is always the same. You can’t create new mass or destroy existing mass.
What a beautifully explained and illustrated lesson. I'll be using this to introduce the Law of Conservation of Mass to my students next week - I think they'll enjoy it! Thank you for creating and sharing.
Good things are coming my way! My life is changing for the better! This will be the best year of my life! I will receive amazing news today! Thank you god 🙏
why is science such a controversial topic.. I believe in God and all that, and science to me is really amazing. To think how far we have gone with the help of science really blows my mind sometimes. Cant we all just appreciate it for what it is? Yea, well thats not gonna happen... Humans will be humans
why is there only 1 electron in the 1s orbital? and being a noble gas why hasn't the electron been expelled? I'm only in year 11 chemistry but I'm pretty sure it's wrong
Thanks for this video... I really enjoyed it and the graphics were ultimate.... I really liked the saying at the end " we are also made of star stuff "😊😊😊😊☺☺☺☺
There is an incorrect statement here: "The energy we supplied is stored in the bonds of the atoms". Bonds actually form by releasing energy. Of course the entropic part gives rise to the necessity of adding energy to form more complex 'ordered' molecules like glucose. At least I think so. Molecules like ATP are 'high energy' substances only because upon breaking that molecule even more strongly bonded molecules like inorganic phosphate or glucose-phosphate are formed where the energy released is greater than that released when ATP itself formed. So to make ATP out of ADP and a phosphate, it takes more energy to break one P-O bond from the phosphate than the energy released when that phosphate bonds with ADP to make ATP. So overall, some energy went into making ATP and so technically it is storing energy by virtue of difference.
If you don't understand what this video is saying (as most of the Top Comments seem to be) - The tl;dr is that (1) *You cannot create or destroy* matter, only rearrange it (2) All matter was created during the Big Bang and most of it was shaped in stars
In order to theorize you have to think outside of the box. Every person on earth lives their daily life thinking inside the box. Be different. Change the world. -Its24x
Since Einsteins E=mc^2 we know that mass is not conserved! Example: In a nuclear reaction mass is not conserved. But energy is. Always. This video is not wrong it's title is just misleading.
Surprisingly, I met a lot of folks who were aware of this... "...existence does not become absolute non-existence, and absolute non-existence does not acquire existence." ~ Abdu’lBaha, Baha'i Faith
but how does this explain life growth and procreation? like a 1yr old baby should have less atoms compared to when he's 21yr old, or does it? any article or book anyone can recommend for this inquiry?
So how come when these molecules go through chemical reactions and explosions, they survive, but us humans are made out of the molecules, but when we go through chemical reactions and explosions, we don't survive, or are damaged?
A debate for the law of conservation of mass/ energy ,I watched a video about these laws in you tube and I asked to him : Hello professor , can I ask you a simple question : imagine if you put a quantity( amount) of water in a glass ( simple glass) , can you put this water in another glass ( I mean : to the extent of 100% of quantity of water ) , can you carry this amount of water( 100% of amount) in another glass ( to put all quantity of water in another glass( without losing any drop or molecule of water during the transportation) , can you do that ? I think If you would try it you wouldn't, if you do that then your law( or equation) would be correct. Same thing happens when water condenses, is impossible to transport( to be transported)all amount of water ( all molecules) during the cycle of condensation,( during the rain formation ),it mean : the matter is losing during the cycles verify the physics pls, Someone reply to me : You need to distinguish between water being left behind and disappearing completely. As you transfer water from one glass to another you leave some behind so the original glass is wet , none of the water actually "dissapears"- matter is conserved . Same with the water cycle,, some water evaporates from the sea, but most remain as sea, some condenses as clouds, but some will remain as vapor ( gas) , some of the cloud will fall as rain but some remains as cloud- and so on. It's all there all the time Another ( someone) replied to me : That's incredible difficult, but you should know that the water you put in the glass will not go away. All of the contents in the first glass of water cannot be destroyed and the water cannot create any more water. It may change state( physically to ice or water vapour) but none of it will vanish, so technically it is possible to do this transfer a, and the law of conservation of mass is still correct. My rocket 🚀 reply was : My intention was to say : after a cycle the matter isn't turning back( at the extent of 100% )( all quantity, all molecules ,) By the way that is happening to the energy too, not only the matter is not turning back,but even the energy isn't turning back too ( as the matter isn't turning back too, so even the law of conservation of energy is not correct, These laws are atheists's laws, they are trying to say : we are eternal ,but that is not true. We're losing, friend ,matter is losing ,energy is losing,( everything is disappearing vanishing ,is losing) Were separating from energy,that is my law, Question : why energy is separating from the matter ? For example : sun is losing energy( heat or light ) where is going this energy ?! Are you saying : the energy will turn back ,it will conserve back into the matter ?; I doubt on it When I say : energy is losing I mean : is disappearing( vanishing) from our dimension ( our world) I can say another thing : if you transfer an amount of energy to another object ( from a battery to another) ,this energy will lose ( vanish ,disappear) anyway ,even you can transfer all energy ( all enectrons ,all atoms) ,it will lose (vanish) again ,or disappear( by casuality, spontaneously) The meaning is : you( all of you ) can conserve nothing ,nothing can be conserved ,that is my law, For example : if you transfer energy from a battery to another battery ( from a power bank to a phone), the phone will lose its energy after four(teen) days ( even if you wouldn't use it ), with other words : energy will separate from matter( from battery), like the sun 's energy,it is separating from it( the sun). Everything is separating ,that's my law. I have made a post in f book about this case ,against atheists ,with simply words the point is : the matter and energy are joined together,question is : who joined them ( it) ?! For example : sun ,sun is made by energy and matter , the sun is losing energy ( heat , light ) , it mean : it was made by two things : energy and matter ,it was joined together ,question is : who joined together them ? There were a high intelligence energy who joined( welded ) them ,( God)
Ps. Not looking for a religious debate just politely wondering because he kinda glossed over that part. Also I have heard the idea that the laws of thermodynamics where created by the Big Bang which also doesn't make sense to me.
The laws of physics describe the physical universe. You're asking a question about "before the physical universe existed." (And, also, "before time existed.") Physics won't help; religion might help with the WHY, but not the HOW.
bcubed72 Well, time isn't really a thing it is more like a measurement created by man to measure entropy. That was what Einstein proved with his theory of relativity. But I see what you are saying. Though I do have another question. If there were no natural laws how did the Big Bang bang (I know it wasn't a real explosion but like how were the quarks attracted to each other and how was there only a set amount of energy in the universe). In my mind the only way something like this would obey the laws of nature would have to be if a infinite source of energy existed out side our universe ( it would have to be outside because according to the first law of thermodynamics if energy exists than it must of come from an outside source.) But thank you for replying. I have had these questions for years.
Both mass and energy can be created and destroyed in an isolated system. However, the total amount of the energy, plus the correspondent energy of the rest mass of particles in the system, is constant. Since when did "mass" became synonymous with "matter and energy"? All matter has mass, but all forms of energy haven't a propriety of mass, including but not limited to gauge bosons, the photon and the gluon. Thus, the mass in a system constantly changes, since blackbody radiation applies to all things hotter than zero Kelvins. If light is produced, than mass is lost, because photons have no mass. However, the _momentum_ in an isolated system is always conversed, except for very local events in quantum mechanics where the law of conservation of momentum actually is broken. However, these small fluctuations zeroes each other out, so overall, the momentum is conserved. And since when did the Big Bang became a literal "bang"? The Big Bang wasn't an explosion of matter into already existing space, but the very beginning of the expansion of spacetime itself.
***** No. Energy is mass times length squared divided by times squared. Mass is a fundamental physical quantity itself. You can easily see this if you consider the SI units for mass versus energy. Mass is measured the base unit kilogram but energy is measured in the derived unit Joule.
Gluons, photons, etc in a isolated system can contribute to the mass of the system itself, even if they don't have mass themselves.. An isolated system by definition does not give off black body radiation, neither does it absorb any (if it did it would be a closed system, not an isolated one). Think of it as a white body rather than a black body
Mass is defined as A. Amount of gravitational influence of an object B. Amount of momentum of object (for given velocity) Both of which "massless" particles posses a non zero amount of.
everything he's saying is going in one ear and out the other
tbh
Ye
Truee
ye
I know right I am in science class like...huh
Raise your hand if your teacher is making you watch this to answer questions for homework
Me
my teachers making me summerize this whole video
My teacher is making me watch like 4 videos [I assume all around 5 minutes long], and then doing a bunch of questions. Pretty boring, but I'm doing it right now
hand: raised
meh
i've watched this like 6 times and still have no clue what he's talking about
Lmaooo same😭
You right
same :/
We all do
its nice i understand more
POV: you look at the comments to get answers.
I found none 😔
POV: this isn't hard for you
yup
No I'm not
The video is talking about the Lw of Conservation of mass which basically tells us that mass can not change( increase or decrease) in an enclosed space. For example, let's say we put baking soda inside a balloon and put that balloon over a flask that already had vinegar inside. When the baking soda falls and creates a reaction with the vinegar there will be little to no decrease or increase in mass as the atoms are not able to disperse. The only reason the mass can change is if the atoms have dispersed but in an enclosed space there is no room for the atoms disperse, hence the reason for the lack of change in mass. I may be wrong but that is what I got from the video also the example is not provided in the video, it is an experiment that my school used to teach us this phenomenon so you may not want to use that! Hope this helps!
U are a life saver
@@ealice5633 literally. I couldn't understand the video but I understood this.
you're a lifesaver thank you
Pov: Your taking classes online
I’m paying thousand to basically teach myself through TH-cam videos. 👨🎓
@@kaei193 same..
😭
YUP
Same man😎
“Thanks to Einstein”
Einstein
He’s the reason I’m failing chemistry
I understood NOTHING 🙃(I have to watch this video for homework and answer questions about this video I’m gonna cry myself to sleep)
did you cry yourself to sleep?
siplezz no I don’t remember what this was for anymore
Superfangirl 101 LMFAO
Me too, i wanna cry, but i have that finish firts after cry. Let's go!!!!! We can't stop now.
pedro nunes HELP ME
I kinda zoned out and just started vibing to the music in the background.
Video: Energy can’t be created or destroyed
Thanos: Hold my beer
KevinGamer KevinGamer ur not funny, it’s matter not energy
Lol, this is funny lighten up you guys
good one
The energy went to the dust
@Lilian Long you're*
When I saw the Carbon Dioxide atom at 1:05, I thought "Dang, Carbon's gettin all the bitches."
lemme correct you, You saw the carbon dioxide molecule*
Sanjay Vasnani Yeah, my bad.
lol
same
Thank you for being the comic relief
the only thing i got from this is that everyone in the comments is confused, and we are made of star stuff
@James Henry Smith yeah sorry buster but I'm an atheist that follows science, not concepts of possible gods or outdated beliefs of the solar system
@James Henry Smith ok you're a bit too much with your preaches, I would like to kindly ask you to leave and find someone else who will listen
@James Henry Smith not in my eyes he ain't, we all see the world differently. we can agree to disagree
*literally haven't processed anything that this guy said DJJDJFJDF-*
Yeah he doesn't spell out the part about what he means about man is being energy and matter. This is a very irritating bad habit whatever words you use what you need to say is that depending upon the arrangement it's going to change its weight. As some of the mass turns into energy the amount of mass that is attracted gravitationally to the Earth is reduced. Now I understand that some people believe that if this container prevents a infrared or just flight from getting out then the light will attract the Box to the Earth the heat in there.
In other words this is hard for people to understand because the narrator has a script that accidentally or deliberately tries to keep this fact Secret. Historically the loss of mass that happens when you freeze water for example has been hidden from late Observers buy the expansion of the water into ice explaining why it floats. It would float even if it took up the same amount of space or slightly less. Liquid water has added weight per molecule because of the Heat that you have to add to ice to make it liquid. The weight of energy is of course easily solved for by dividing the equation Buy what's the variable for energy to remove it from the left side and then multiplying by m which replaces that e for energy with the m for Mass. So that means that on the right side of the equation you have M squared multiplied times c squared the speed of light and then of course you have to know what the units are as someone recently did the math for to prove what I am saying to be false but only in his mind.
I had to watch this video for Science homework but the comments are so distracting
same
Who knew I’d be 29, now seeking this information out! Wish I appreciated it in school!!!
We are all made of star stuff = best thing in this video
yay finally i am the 1st reply and you read this
we are all stars
Bruh
Tell that to a Christian
@@ambwow5969 Christian approved
You are forgetting the biggest question. What caused the big bang? If matter and energy can't be created, how did nothing explode into everything?
Nothing exploded, and that the thing. The Big Bang is not an explosion of matter moving outward to fill an empty universe. Instead, space itself expands with time everywhere and increases the physical distance between two comoving points. In other words, the Big Bang is not an explosion in space, but rather an expansion of space.
No shit sherlock! The big bang is more accurately described as "the everywhere stretch". I'm saying If matter and energy can't be created, then what caused all that energy to come into existance?
Levshu Whovian The total amount of the Universe is actually zero, so no energy was ever need to "come into existence". There's a thing called negative energy, you know. This theory, the Zero-energy universe theory, states that the total energy in Universe is actually counteracted with negative potential energy. Since potential energy always is negative, it cancels out the positive energy.
Do you have evidence that this "negative energy universe" exists? or is it just another thing someone made up to try to make sense of the contradicting nature of out universe? Also, what caused our universe to come into existence along with the negative energy to counteract it? or do objects at rest tend to stay at rest unless they happen to be a universe, in which case all bets are off.
Levshu Whovian Really, "energy" itself does not really exist at all, but is rather the integral of the force with respect to the distance which the force acts.
this narrator always helps me sleep..ty dude..😁
Can’t understand the video for the life of you? Well then, I’ve got your back.
No matter what you do to mass, wether it be a chemical or physical change, the amount of mass is always the same. You can’t create new mass or destroy existing mass.
tysm
tysm
A forever hero
absolute life saver omg
Law of conservation of mass basically means that it can't be destroyed or created during a chemical reaction but it changes from one form to another
Does this mean....COWS FART ROCKET FUEL?!?!?!?!?! Literally the only thing i got from the video xD
you fart rocket fuel as well.
Or is a rocket just a huge cow?
Shut your pie hole that’s unfunny you moron guts
Michael Perry your an example of that one annoying , irrelevant kid who tries to act cool and/or ruin anything e.g a joke for other people
Th3D4rkKn16ht I might have ruined this “joke” if it was even remotely funny
What a beautifully explained and illustrated lesson. I'll be using this to introduce the Law of Conservation of Mass to my students next week - I think they'll enjoy it! Thank you for creating and sharing.
how'd it go
3:54 DORITOS EVERYWHERE!
Verdeil Cyprien mlg Army!!
lolololllolololollolololololollololoplolo
*OMNOMNOMNOMNOMNOMNOMNOMNOM*
@@darrenanimatic9675 yay
*aggressively throws cheese*
It's fascinating when you connect physics with spirituality
0:51 I see what you did there with the arms 😂😂
What does it mean tho?
@@walnutbrain5471 the number of covalent bonds each element has
@@jae3966 Kay thanks
This actually really helped me understand the increase of mass, thank you!
i love ted. ted is love. ted is life.
ted is ed
Bruh I HATE science class I just wanna enjoy my weekend but NO I have to watch this and answer a million questions
Good things are coming my way!
My life is changing for the better!
This will be the best year of my life!
I will receive amazing news today!
Thank you god 🙏
I wish
2:57, If you have functional ear, you can listen at that back music right, so that music is also used in a roblox game call ''Flood Escape''' tho
Kevin Macleod’s royalty free music is good to use anywhere without worrying about copyright problems
the particle animations give me joy
This dudes Voice is amazing
I think it is familiar
I love how people in your class will watch this, may see your comment and never know it’s you
big bang lol... I don't know anyone whose satisfied with that theory of existence.
HuckleberryFFinn must be tough having no friends, it’s okay tho you should just try harder 💚💚
Big bang 🔥 Presenting theories as if they were facts. 👍
So if we're all made of star stuff, does that mean we literally mean it when we say "You're a star!"?
@Kevin Alfredo Henriquez Duran we’re talking scientifically not religiously
Thanks for helping me i really need this for my school
spot on. to the point. will definitely be using this in class this year!
3:39 3:39 when the lightbulb in your head finally lights up and everything suddenly makes sense and you end up mind blown
What came first? The narration or the animation?
why do you care
Having narration come first would've been easier
@@marwaalfahim9013 why do you care about why he cares?
VWLZ this was one year ago and I was forced to watch this so like my mood wasn’t the best then 😪
I don't get why this has so many dislikes, he is literally explaining how the law of conservation of mass works. I think it's just the haters.
People who have to watch this video for their homework or during science class 👇
Thank you please upload more law of chemistry
I actually think learned more from this video than I did in my 2 hours lecture lol
2:40 this part till end was out of my syllabus but such an itch in the brain! thanks for the explanation helped and satisfied my doubts!
why is science such a controversial topic.. I believe in God and all that, and science to me is really amazing. To think how far we have gone with the help of science really blows my mind sometimes. Cant we all just appreciate it for what it is? Yea, well thats not gonna happen... Humans will be humans
This. I guess you and me are both special for being theists as well as well educated in things like science...
I have a question, why these videos does not have ads? its a hard work to make these videos so they deserve a remuneration for what they are doing.
TED is a nonprofit
Way more fun to watch when I'm playing the Animal Crossing theme in the background.
I Love All Ted Eds
Amazing. Thank you for an awesome video
Honestly adds more question in my head. Good explanation though.
Biology :you're made up of cells
Chemistry:you're made up of atoms
Physics :you're made of up 'star dust'
Me:😐
The atoms make up the star dust make up the cells make up the you!
Chemistry is the best way possible to get a blessed life
Stars Are Made Up Of Atoms ,So
Atoms Makes Cells -> Cells Makes The Human Body ,
Indirectly The Human Body is Made Up Of Stars(Atoms)..!!
Got to watch this in class today, way better than the usual BrainPop
I’m an 11 year old watching this for fun and I acc understand most of it
Tryna help me I have an assignment on this😭💀
Very nice explanation
0:19
Helium anion represented with the Bohr model with three different orbitals.
Ow. All these years of chemistry... Ow.
why is there only 1 electron in the 1s orbital? and being a noble gas why hasn't the electron been expelled? I'm only in year 11 chemistry but I'm pretty sure it's wrong
Yeah
I feel really sad for people who believe in a random creation by explosion rather than a dynamic creation by a kind and loving God. Bless you.
"We're all made of star-stuff" now that was deep 😂
Thanks for this video... I really enjoyed it and the graphics were ultimate.... I really liked the saying at the end " we are also made of star stuff "😊😊😊😊☺☺☺☺
A 1- helium ion? I would have thought better from you guys! 00:18
There is an incorrect statement here: "The energy we supplied is stored in the bonds of the atoms". Bonds actually form by releasing energy. Of course the entropic part gives rise to the necessity of adding energy to form more complex 'ordered' molecules like glucose. At least I think so.
Molecules like ATP are 'high energy' substances only because upon breaking that molecule even more strongly bonded molecules like inorganic phosphate or glucose-phosphate are formed where the energy released is greater than that released when ATP itself formed. So to make ATP out of ADP and a phosphate, it takes more energy to break one P-O bond from the phosphate than the energy released when that phosphate bonds with ADP to make ATP. So overall, some energy went into making ATP and so technically it is storing energy by virtue of difference.
YOO WHY WE GOIN SO FAST 💀
Addison Anderson is basically narrating my whole schooling, I rely on these videos too much 0-0
mass comes from energy, E=mc^2
This equation describes how energy comes from mass, not the other way around.
Thank you it is very very useful
So... God created matter that we can't have more nor less.
no god didnt create anything it was an everlasting expansion if space
God was created by humans to explain things primitive humans didn't know the answers to
If you don't understand what this video is saying (as most of the Top Comments seem to be) -
The tl;dr is that (1) *You cannot create or destroy* matter, only rearrange it (2) All matter was created during the Big Bang and most of it was shaped in stars
In order to theorize you have to think outside of the box. Every person on earth lives their daily life thinking inside the box. Be different. Change the world.
-Its24x
Great video ...thank you man
Since Einsteins E=mc^2 we know that mass is not conserved!
Example: In a nuclear reaction mass is not conserved.
But energy is. Always.
This video is not wrong it's title is just misleading.
But energy and matter are just 2 sides of the same coin, so that comment is misleading.
Really glade that i have subscribed your channel
From gen chem to astrophysics
Surprisingly, I met a lot of folks who were aware of this... "...existence does not become absolute non-existence, and absolute non-existence does not acquire existence." ~ Abdu’lBaha, Baha'i Faith
I ♥︎ cow.
Eric Morrison
spare ribs or t-bone ?
Ooo😯
Thank you
If it cant be created
Then how does it exist?
"we are all made of star stuff" is actually such an aesthetic verse.
but how does this explain life growth and procreation? like a 1yr old baby should have less atoms compared to when he's 21yr old, or does it?
any article or book anyone can recommend for this inquiry?
We eat stuff
We don't make new stuff, we just we just kind of absorb it. Think of something like agar.io
Very nice too watch.How many elements are they on the periodic table
Hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha hahahaha
"We are all made by star stuff" How about God?
He simply doesn’t exist logically, only religiously.
That’s offensive to Christians, they don’t believe that and you can’t judge them just because you don’t..
@@Lotus3.2.2. No, I’m saying that he isn’t taken into account, not that he doesn’t exist
No.
This is one of the best educational videos I've seen in a while!
i'm tired of my teachers sending me links to these mfs
I didn't know these things..am so interested in this
So how come when these molecules go through chemical reactions and explosions, they survive, but us humans are made out of the molecules, but when we go through chemical reactions and explosions, we don't survive, or are damaged?
the molecules survive but or body doesn't
What a great question
Small (
Nuclear Weapons: Am I a joke to you?
My dad just said this and I needed to watch a video on it
3:53 flying Doritos!!!
So many questions must answer
2:53. “The Big Bang” *Switches on tv*
Impressive explanation.
i have small test on this wish me luck😅
A debate for the law of conservation of mass/ energy ,I watched a video about these laws in you tube and I asked to him :
Hello professor , can I ask you a simple question : imagine if you put a quantity( amount) of water in a glass ( simple glass) , can you put this water in another glass ( I mean : to the extent of 100% of quantity of water ) , can you carry this amount of water( 100% of amount) in another glass ( to put all quantity of water in another glass( without losing any drop or molecule of water during the transportation) , can you do that ?
I think If you would try it you wouldn't, if you do that then your law( or equation) would be correct. Same thing happens when water condenses, is impossible to transport( to be transported)all amount of water ( all molecules) during the cycle of condensation,( during the rain formation ),it mean : the matter is losing during the cycles
verify the physics pls,
Someone reply to me :
You need to distinguish between water being left behind and disappearing completely. As you transfer water from one glass to another you leave some behind so the original glass is wet , none of the water actually "dissapears"- matter is conserved . Same with the water cycle,, some water evaporates from the sea, but most remain as sea, some condenses as clouds, but some will remain as vapor ( gas) , some of the cloud will fall as rain but some remains as cloud- and so on. It's all there all the time
Another ( someone) replied to me :
That's incredible difficult, but you should know that the water you put in the glass will not go away. All of the contents in the first glass of water cannot be destroyed and the water cannot create any more water. It may change state( physically to ice or water vapour) but none of it will vanish, so technically it is possible to do this transfer a, and the law of conservation of mass is still correct.
My rocket 🚀 reply was :
My intention was to say : after a cycle the matter isn't turning back( at the extent of 100% )( all quantity, all molecules ,)
By the way that is happening to the energy too, not only the matter is not turning back,but even the energy isn't turning back too ( as the matter isn't turning back too, so even the law of conservation of energy is not correct,
These laws are atheists's laws, they are trying to say : we are eternal ,but that is not true.
We're losing, friend ,matter is losing ,energy is losing,( everything is disappearing vanishing ,is losing)
Were separating from energy,that is my law,
Question : why energy is separating from the matter ? For example : sun is losing energy( heat or light ) where is going this energy ?! Are you saying : the energy will turn back ,it will conserve back into the matter ?; I doubt on it
When I say : energy is losing I mean : is disappearing( vanishing) from our dimension ( our world)
I can say another thing : if you transfer an amount of energy to another object ( from a battery to another) ,this energy will lose ( vanish ,disappear) anyway ,even you can transfer all energy ( all enectrons ,all atoms) ,it will lose (vanish) again ,or disappear( by casuality, spontaneously)
The meaning is : you( all of you ) can conserve nothing ,nothing can be conserved ,that is my law,
For example : if you transfer energy from a battery to another battery ( from a power bank to a phone), the phone will lose its energy after four(teen)
days ( even if you wouldn't use it ), with other words : energy will separate from matter( from battery), like the sun 's energy,it is separating from it( the sun). Everything is separating ,that's my law.
I have made a post in f book about this case ,against atheists ,with simply words the point is : the matter and energy are joined together,question is : who joined them ( it) ?! For example : sun ,sun is made by energy and matter , the sun is losing energy ( heat , light ) , it mean : it was made by two things : energy and matter ,it was joined together ,question is : who joined together them ? There were a high intelligence energy who joined( welded ) them ,( God)
I think he love cows
Believing nothing created everything is crazy in my opinion
So where did the Big Bang get all that energy.
Ps. Not looking for a religious debate just politely wondering because he kinda glossed over that part. Also I have heard the idea that the laws of thermodynamics where created by the Big Bang which also doesn't make sense to me.
The laws of physics describe the physical universe. You're asking a question about "before the physical universe existed." (And, also, "before time existed.") Physics won't help; religion might help with the WHY, but not the HOW.
bcubed72 Well, time isn't really a thing it is more like a measurement created by man to measure entropy. That was what Einstein proved with his theory of relativity. But I see what you are saying. Though I do have another question. If there were no natural laws how did the Big Bang bang (I know it wasn't a real explosion but like how were the quarks attracted to each other and how was there only a set amount of energy in the universe). In my mind the only way something like this would obey the laws of nature would have to be if a infinite source of energy existed out side our universe ( it would have to be outside because according to the first law of thermodynamics if energy exists than it must of come from an outside source.) But thank you for replying. I have had these questions for years.
Lol the big bang defies every law of physics and is still 'scientific'
I'd much rather believe God loves me
@Jack Narloch yes I believe in God he started it all
satisfying video!! great
What about the newest theory that there was no big bang and the universe had no beginning nor it will have an end.
What theory?
*Hypothesis
Walz
Big bang is Hypothesis aswell
It's not so much a new theory as an old one that has recently got a resurge in publicity.
riskzerobeatz It's a scientific theory
Can you say BS? I like how you present theories as facts
Both mass and energy can be created and destroyed in an isolated system. However, the total amount of the energy, plus the correspondent energy of the rest mass of particles in the system, is constant.
Since when did "mass" became synonymous with "matter and energy"? All matter has mass, but all forms of energy haven't a propriety of mass, including but not limited to gauge bosons, the photon and the gluon. Thus, the mass in a system constantly changes, since blackbody radiation applies to all things hotter than zero Kelvins. If light is produced, than mass is lost, because photons have no mass. However, the _momentum_ in an isolated system is always conversed, except for very local events in quantum mechanics where the law of conservation of momentum actually is broken. However, these small fluctuations zeroes each other out, so overall, the momentum is conserved.
And since when did the Big Bang became a literal "bang"? The Big Bang wasn't an explosion of matter into already existing space, but the very beginning of the expansion of spacetime itself.
***** At rest mass?
***** No. Energy is mass times length squared divided by times squared. Mass is a fundamental physical quantity itself. You can easily see this if you consider the SI units for mass versus energy. Mass is measured the base unit kilogram but energy is measured in the derived unit Joule.
ashX How's my age relevant to the debate?
Gluons, photons, etc in a isolated system can contribute to the mass of the system itself, even if they don't have mass themselves..
An isolated system by definition does not give off black body radiation, neither does it absorb any (if it did it would be a closed system, not an isolated one). Think of it as a white body rather than a black body
Mass is defined as
A. Amount of gravitational influence of an object
B. Amount of momentum of object (for given velocity)
Both of which "massless" particles posses a non zero amount of.
This teacher made them watch this :D