The Ottomans helped the Mughals many times with military or economic aid. The last Ottoman Sultan was the father in law of The Nizam of Hyderabad. Babur may have gotten his first artillery from the Ottomans.
Totally incorrect. Mughals were among the richest in the world. There were occasional diplomatic exchanges but no such aid you speak of. There were vast expanses of land between the two empires. Nizam of Hyderabad was an English stooge, a big ass licker. Have you seen his Emblem. Go check it.
Empires help and assist each other that is a given. Babur initially in the 1st battle of panipat was supported by ottoman cannon makers(a political move) thats about it. What came after Akbar until Aurangzeb...The ottomans ..safavids...infact no empire in the world was a match to the Mughals.
Babur's early with the Ottoman dynasty were poor because Selim I provided Babur's Uzbek rival Ubaydullah Khan with powerful matchlocks and cannons. When Selim I offered Shah Babur to accept him as his rightful suzerain, Babur refused even to accept those envoys. They were not even allowed to enter Kabul
@@zwpm Mughal Empire or Saltanat e Gurkaniye, was the rightful successor of Timurid dynasty in Indian subcontinent. There could no word about comparing Mughals with any other middle eastern sultanate. 1) Mughals controlled 35% of entire economy of the world! 2) Mughals had 7 times bigger economy that Ottomans and Safavids together 3) Ottomans and Safavids were rather regional powers in the Middle East without any presence in world ocean and without any leverage to impact world events.
Respect Muslim history is very underrated and we have very good examples to share to the world one example is the civilisation in Spain and Portugal al -andalus ruled by Muslims for 800 years the best nation in Europe for hundred of years, alhambra palace
It's not just sultans, their whole bureaucratic structure was spectacularly well organised. The cracks began to arrive in the era of Suleiman and the figure of sultan declined dramatically after him.
That's where the fall of empire started. When you'll study about Sultans of Ottoman Empire untill Sultan Suleiman, then you'll realise the amount of damage empire got after they started lacking visionary sultans. Yes women or sulatanas does prevent empire to fell into the hands of Europe but we can't just run away from the facts. @@ferdousshiekh4893
I had this question stuck in my mind for many days.Thank you for making a video on this intresting topic. I would love to learn more about Ottomans. Keep it up 🤍👍
This was an awesome vid as usual. Keep this stuff up, ignore any random hate comments down below. I really agree with the part where the west wants us to forget the insane thriving of the east, it’s part of their ‘domination’ way to completely change the narrative of the thrival of the east’s past and position themselves as superior just because they had a phase of an intellectual golden age. The narrative of a people’s heritage that they embrace (and not distance themselves away from saying it’s just the past, or even worse, taking ‘false pride’ in their past like most Indians do), is very important in setting the standards of their current position in global order since they would have a ‘benchmark’ to meet.
There are so many western movies on European kings and queens but I wish they had more on either ottoman rulers, middle eastern rulers, East Asian etc…. There are so many historic rulers outside of the European monarchies that have really interesting stories
That was how the bloody succession system worked in the Ottoman Empire. But it was not the reason the Ottoman Empire was successful. The Ottoman Empire was successful because they followed the Islamic principles of serving justice and freedom of worship to ALL citizens without bias, be they Muslim or non Muslim. This is what made them distinct from the Crusaders, the Byzantines, the Mongols, the Saffavids and all the other competing powers that failed. Marrying into the local population and promoting non elites into high ranking positions was part of that process.
Mongols were more religiously tolerant before they converted to Islam. Chengez Khan and his descendants for a few generations had zero problems with religious diversity. And it were the Ottomans under whom the Christians revolted because they had second class status.
@@grapeshott wrong. The majority of the supporters of the Ottoman Empire were Christians. In fact they formed the majority of Ottoman citizens for centuries. And there was no "religous" revolt against the Ottomans. When the empire started to collapse, those who fought against it included Muslim Arabs, Muslim Bosnians. Muslim Albanians, Muslim Sudanese, Muslim Egyptions etc. As for the Mongols, they were quite well known for carrying out ethnic cleansing against Sunni Muslims. For example, the sacking of Baghdad. Ironically the majority of Mongols eventually converted to Sunni Islam after coming more into contact with Muslims.
@@help123research4 the Ottomans were not superior warriors to anyone else in their region. The man reason they succeeded is because they allowed people to keep their religion, culture and language and protected them from the brutal medieval world around them. This is the reason why the former Ottoman lands are the most culturally diverse lands in the world. The same can be said for the Mughal lands.
Unpopular opinion: The over-involvement of women (wives/mothers/concubines) in politics is what led to the destabilization and fall of so many of these empires and dynasties, including Roman julio-claudian as well as ottoman.
Thank you for presenting such an interesting topic in such great detail. I have just finished watching the web series Payitaht: Sultan Abdul Hamid, and I was fascinated by his intelligence and strategic brilliance. I tried to research more about him, but as you mentioned, there isn’t much consolidated material available. Even where information exists, it is scattered all over the internet. I hope you make more videos on ottman Empire, especially sultan abdul hamid II. He had extraordinary political accumen, and i strongly believe that people should know about him
Sister, focus on the Ottoman Empire. It definitely is going to bring you a bigger audience. You can focus on Sultan Orhan right now, as the Osman series is ending. People will naturally want to know what happens next. Mark my word. I just watched Kurulus Osman, and your video showed up. And I understand TH-cam SEO. That's why this is my recommendation for you, though you did not ask for it. Also, Sultan Bayezid is my favorite. Bayezid the Thunderbolt who fought against Timur. Have a read; the history is better than any film story. One more thing, you can just make an ottoman series based on each sultan. May be 3 video each. There are famous Lala nad commanders you can also include. For example, Lala Shahin pasha, Chandarly Khalil pasha, Haci Ilbey. Also, sultans like Nilufar Khatun, Gul Bahar (you already mentioned).
The Ottoman Empire is often considered the third great Islamic caliphate, following the Rashidun and Umayyad Caliphates. Unlike other empires the holy cities of Mecca and Medina, which strengthened its claim to leadership in the Muslim world
What a great video is this. A perfect blend of knowledge and decent editing and on the top of that, the youtuber is a female which is gaining views just by sharing her knowledge with zero nu*ity and bad words.
Very informative video, Pakistan and Ottoman have always had good relations especially at the time of khalipeth and let us not forget the engineers of URDU language ottoman generals both from the religion and historical ties we are always in good alignment with our brothers and sisters from Pakistan. Love from Turkiye 🇹🇷 ❤ 🇵🇰
During Sultan Mehmed's long 30-year reign, the Sultan not only conquered Constantinople, but spent his entire life fighting, as summarized below, viz... 1. Conquest of Constantinople (1453) Opponent: Byzantine Emperor Constantine XI Description: The Byzantine Empire fell with the conquest of Constantinople and it was established as the capital of the Ottomans. 2. Siege of Belgrade (1456) Opponent: John Hunyadi, Hungarian general Description: The Ottoman forces were not successful in this battle and it became a hindrance to their advance towards Western Europe. 3. The Morea Campaign (1458-1460) Adversaries: Local rulers of the Byzantine peninsula Description: The remaining Byzantine forces on the Morea Peninsula are eliminated. 4. Conquest of Trebizond (1461) Antagonist: David Komenenos, ruler of the Trebizond Empire Description: The remnants of the Byzantine Empire at Trebizond fall. 5. Bosnian Campaign (1463) Opponent: King Stephen Tomasevic of Bosnia Description: Bosnia became part of the Ottoman Empire and Ottoman power increased in the Balkans. 6Expedition to Wallachia (Moldova) (1475-1476) Antagonist: Vlad Dracula, ruler of Wallachia Description: Sultan Mehmed launched a campaign against Vlad, the ruler of Wallachia, but it was considered a long-term war. 7. Battle of Otluqbeli (1473) Opponent: Ak-Koyunlu ruler Uzun Hasan Description: Mehmed Ak-Koyunlu defeated the Empire in this battle and strengthened Ottoman influence in Eastern Anatolia. #MehmedFetihlerSultanı
Very informative video but i would suggest to be in a flow. Because the video is feels like it is boring. Add a little effects and emotions and a sequential flow to the video overall nice job.
Nope. The empire generally stagnated because of the loss of hegemony over eastern trade and lagging behind the rest of Europe in technology and military organisation
These succession battles are the one of the reasons of declining of the mughal empire. And give East India Company easy access to internal matters of kingdom which eventually led to British Rule in India.
What I've heard about sending princes to other provinces is that after sultan Suleiman when his drunk son selim II ascented to throne he didn't sent his sons to any province and it was the beginning of the destruction of Ottoman Empire. I've also heard that his son Mehmet III or murad III had 124 ladies and they were just enjoying in Palace and their vezirs were running the empire all by themselves. First 10 Sultans were the only real and most intelligent sultans of ottomans... Yes Murad VI (the brutal according to west) was the last sultan who was powerful but he was killed by his mother 😔
@@AbdurrehmanRiaz-u4e Abdul hamid was a sultan which was intelligent and tried to save the empire but failed as their forefathers had destroyed it to such an extent
Yıldırım Bayezid indeed killed his own brother to take the throne but we see these dynastic murders as early as Osman Bey the founder who killed his uncle. It was the Mehmed the II who legalized murder of the brothers for sultans in order to maintain governmental power.
Ottoman Empire should be taught not because its achievements but how it ensured Muslims to fall behind in the scientific thinking by freezing the free movement of Ideas, People and goods. It created rigid structures which was modern in terms of 13th century but was one of the worst systems for 18th century.
The Ottoman Caliphate represented a cohesive and disciplined governance system, functioning as a unifying force for the Muslim Ummah through the principles of Islamic brotherhood. Rather than being authoritarian, it fostered unity among Muslim regions under the guiding ethos of mutual solidarity and collective responsibility.
Bullshit It was not efficient outside of anatolia The empire was good when it faced much smaller and weaker disunited and backward european states of medieval times But those states saw their flaws and improved Ottomans didn’t. They continued ruling in a medieval state up until mid 19th century with tax farmers and segregated laws
@@ssmot113 The Ottoman Empire treated Non-Muslims better compared to those in Medieval Europe. But it is true that non-Muslims are second-class citizens. With the Decrees of the Tanzimat(1839), the inequality between Non-Muslims and Muslims decreased. The Greeks and Armenians became the richest people. The trade was carried out by them. Everyone knows what happened to the Jews in Spain. It was the Ottomans who saved the Jews. The Balkans could have been completely Turkish. This was also not done.
Can you guide me on how they would be trained and educated about different matters, any expert recommendation will be helpful in terms of the curriculum for those princes
if ottomans were that strict about their next sultans then why did the empire fall, i know there are many reasons like Economic difficulties & scabbing but if they were trained that hard then how they missed these basic points?
Sorry but this video is flawed from the start. Selim I's mother Ayşe (Gülbahar) Hatun was the daughter of Alauddevle Bozkurt Beg, Beg of Dulkadirs, so no her father didnt convert to Islam and sent her daughter to harem while aiming to be next sultan's grandfather.
As the video progresses, you made it sound as if princes mother's are the one who educate them, princes would have numerous tutors and they are the one actually taught stuff to them. Also princes mother's doesnt govern their sanjaks, its prince's tutors who governed the sanjak on the behalf of princes until they are old enough to do it themselves.
And no Sultans didnt took concubines from minorities to help their sons understand the issues of the minorites through their mothers, its done because those woman was daughters of nobodies, since being wife or mother of a sultan is a useful position, their families would have exploit her relationship with sultan, To prevent that Ottomans took concubines.
The most important times the world has ever had had . Europe knows that very well - and so does world historians - the problem is they were afraid of the Muslim influence .
There are valid criticisms in the comment section about Pakistanis learning Ottoman history so seriously, as if its their own national heritage. Yes, every school worldwide learn about history of foreign countries like USA, France, Russia, Japan, etc, but most dont attach a national pride to it. Pakistanis attach a national pride to Ottoman history, even if they had very little to do with South Asia.
“Valid criticisms”? What exactly does that mean. People derive heritage, identity and values from a plethora of sources in the modern world. While the whole world is busy chasing after western cultural and civilisational idioms, what’s wrong with any nation chasing after Ottoman (or any other) cultural or civilisational idioms?
No he didnt. It was because he didnt have any brothers to kill. Most of them died young. Plus mehmed the second even ruled for few years even when his father Murad 2 was still alive.
@ Dont know What language you are speaking or your reading comprehension is below average. MEHMET THE SECOND (2) aka MEHMET the conquerer was the one who created the law of fracticide also known as killing the princes so there will be no civil war within the empire just like it happend between MEHMET the First and his bother during the ottoman Interregum aka civil war in 1402-1413. MEHMET THE SECOND ruled twice once during when his Father Sultan Murad || was alive, at the years 1444 - 1446 and he ruled again after his Father Sultan Murad || died in 1451 and he didnt have brothers at that time… you should go read some history books before you comment on here and increase in your understanding on it.
It is an ancient manuscript. Thus, the existence of a person named Panini goes no further than epic. Prest PLEARS There is a great deal of falsification regarding the manuscript Panini from 1663 found in Kashmir. There is a grammar book written by a person whose period is unknown. However, there is no such ending. There is also no document proving that Panini is alive. The claim reads: "Since the nineteenth European scholars found and published Panini's work, Panini has been affirmed as the first linguist and father of linguistics." It is claimed that Panini wrote this book around 500 BC. However, there is no text or writing left from that period. There is only one manuscript dating from AD 1663. From this, it is understood that the oral hymn, which is claimed to be the epic person named Panini, was first written down in 1663. Hence, this written language is 17th century Sanskrit. Panini is an epic person like our Korkut Ata (Dede Korkut). Korkut Ata, in the ancient epics of the Oghuz Turks (page 31) He is a wise person who was glorified and sanctified and a poet who is supposed to tell the ancient epics of the Turks. It is unclear whether he ever lived or not. There is no information about his life. The oldest source that mentions Korkut Ata is the ending Câmi el Tevârih of the Ilkhanid prime minister (vizier) Reşidüddin Fazullah Hamedani (1247 - 1318). The epic of Korkut Ata was written down several times by unknown authors in the 14th or 15th century. The name of the manuscript in Dresden is "Kitab-ı Dedem Korkud Ala Lisan-1 Täife-i Oğuzân", the name of the manuscript in the Vatican is "Hikayet-i Oğuznâme, Kazan Beğ ve Gayri". Now, if we say that Korkut Ata is the oldest linguist or the father of linguistics, we would be bogus. However, Mahmud of Kashgar is the oldest known linguist on earth and the true father of linguistics. Because he wrote the oldest known dictionary between 1072-1074. With extensive explanations and grammatical explanations. This dictionary named "Divan-1 Lugat el Türk" is Turkish-Arabic. European scientists engage in genealogy (racism). This is a fascist understanding of science. The so-called European linguists, who put forward the fabricated "Indo-European language" thesis, try to make a manuscript that is about four hundred years old look like it is thousands of years old in order to cover it up. Because, according to European linguists, Sanskrit "is a classical language spoken in South Asia from the Indo-Aryan branch of the Indo-European languages, and originated by spreading from the north to South Asia in the late Bronze Age." The Late Bronze Age is the name given to the period between 1500 BC and 1200 BC. The north of India is Central Asia, the homeland of the Turks. In short, the dimensions of falsification are that wide. The hymn called segurft astadhyayi (eighth chapter), allegedly written by Panini, is the argued to be oldest surviving hymn Sanskrit grammar writings. However, there is no written document. There are hyms that have been handed down only orally from generation to generation, not a written document. Those who try to deceive them as if they are written documents are only committing fraud. There is also no documented script in Sanskrit. It is claimed to have been first written in various Brahmi scripts in the late 1st millennium AD, but there is no evidence or documentation. Sanskrit was written in the Devanagari script in the contemporary period. There is no written document remaining from this language, which is called "Vedic Sanskrit" and is claimed to cover the period between 1500 BC and 500 BC. The Vedas have been orally transmitted from generation to generation for centuries. The oldest written farewells found today are manuscripts written in the Devangari script of the early 19th century, called 'Rigveda' (Sanskrit: Rigvidy). However, European scholars argue that the Rigveda is the oldest known Sanskrit script. However, the Rigveda was also transmitted orally until the beginning of the 19th century. Devangari script, which is claimed to have emerged in the 7th century, is the script known today as Indian script. However, it is not known exactly when the Devangari script was formed. Duismeism (fraud) in the field of "written documents" does not end there, either. It is claimed that Kalidasa, who is said to be the greatest Sanskrit playwright, wrote in classical Sanskrit and laid the foundations of modern sang (arithmetic) in this language. However, it is not known in which age he lived, and there is no information about his life. The exact period of his "writing" is also unknown, but it is suggested that it was probably written before the 5th century AD. But again, there is no written document. There are only küğs (hymns). The two great Sanskrit epics, the Mahabarat and the Ramayana, are also a series of oral hymns. (Page 33) European pseudo-linguists and inspired by Indian linguists refer to the local languages spoken in the Indian subcontinent from the 3rd century BC to the 8th century AD as Prakrit. He also defines Sanskrit as a standardized language used by ancient Indian khanates for literary, official and religious purposes. Prakrit is a word taken from Sanskrit. The Sanskrit word ri prakrit means 'rough', 'primitive', 'low', 'natural'. This word has been transformed into Sanskrit from the Old Turkic word birg, which means 'dirty', 'not pure', 'stool', 'dirt'. However, there is no written document between the 3rd century BC and the 8th century AD. Existing "Prakrit" manuscripts date from between 1300 AD and 1800 AD. It is assumed that these manuscripts were copied from earlier manuscripts. To make such a claim without any written documents dating from the 3rd century BC to the 8th century AD is unscientific and fraudulent. Linguistics cannot be built on assumptions, and anyone who tries to do so is at odds with science. The formation of Hindi and its dialects took quite a long time. The formation of Sanskrit, a divine language, took place in parallel with this. This formation process, which started with the influence of Turkish from Daravidian, then continued with the influence of Pelasg and finally completed its formation with the influence of Arabic and Persian. The first Muslim Turkish rule, the Delhi Sultanate, included present-day Northern India, Pakistan, Nepal, and Bangladesh. During the Delhi Sultanate, the Hindustani language, which was spoken as a lingua franca, emerged in Northern India, which consisted of these lands. Present-day Hindi, Nepali, Bengali, Urdu and other Indian languages are variants of the Hindustani language. These languages are close to each other and are generally mutually intelligible. page 34 Part 3 of Transformation/Reset Of Tatars To Indians. Linguist Researcher Arif Cengiz Erman's book North Indian peoples origin. Küzey Hint Toplukların Kökeni
I would gift u 100 dollars. But i don't have it. I pray Allah to gift you hundred & hundreds of dollars. Dear, please keep grifting us videos like those. Love from Bangladesh ❤
I'm a Turkish girl and I can say it's okay to despise harem system, people try to sugarcoat it by saying it was a place of learning and so on but every monarchy holds their prestigious education nevertheless. Education of heirs is everybody's concern for all monarchs on Earth, have you played Crusader Kings before? Harem is a system of abuse, locking kidnapped women made sex slaves. It's better to have Ulugh Beg,Sultan Alparslan or Omar Khayyam born out of nikah instead of sultans born out of concubineage, morally at least. Ottoman state was glorious but machiavellian just as much. Turkic state structure always included influencial empresses, focus on formal marriage mind you. Ottomans breached it fearing another dynasty will contest their power but harem system is still disguisting.
Being Muslim we should learn n understand Muslim history .. what’s wrong in owning Muslim history . All the Christian countries on the contrary carry their faith and interests both gracefully n rigidly. It’s ironic that we Muslims are always targeted even just for talking about Muslim empires in different eras .
The Formation Of Sanskrit Language. part1 The very first Tatar kingdoms İn India is the: (and all of them were Turkish administrations with their Real Tatar/Turkish Names. Never in Hindistan History Others then the Turks Ruled. Delete also the words Mongols, Persians, Chinees, Slavs, Celts, Europeans.. out of your memory... actually the list is much longer.. These were/are all Turks Kuru Khanate, then the Sixteen (16) Khanate, (after the union of the smaller khanates). Magad Khanate. Morya (Maurya Empire) Khanate, Satavhana (includes the word Han) Khanate, India Sak (Saka/Scythian Turks) Khanate, and then The KusHan or Kuşan Khanate. Then, AK Hun Khanate.. More precisely AK Kun (Sun/Day) Khanate.. Watka Khanate, Kurça Khaganate, After the..... .. Khanate, The Delhi Sultanate, The Halac period, The Tugluks period, The Sa(E)yyids period, the Bengal Sultanate, the Baybarli Sultanate, Then the British colonialism and frauds are coming, they are doing their best not to call/count them as Turks.. Politics of erasing Tatars/Turks from history.. (I will add a summery of what exactly the Brits did how long these dynasties lasted why they ended and why and when an other arrised) I will add later writing/articles passages from books about their religion similarities with Tengrism religion, exactly the same: evolved much later in to (actually just called Hinduism and after Budha Buddhism.. and articles of each of those khaganates and a summery from Turkish historians.. I have gathered already tens of articles adding to this narrative for who want to know more about it pls check my group The Turkic Origin of Indian societies and the formation of their languages for more articles about this subject. ×××××××÷ From Arif Cengiz Erman's book. The location of the BMAC, Andronovo and Yaz Tepe civilizations (camera translation) The Dravidians were the indigenous people of the Indian subcontinent. As the Turks spread from the Indus Valley into the interior of India, the Indian elgini (ethno) was formed in northern India from a mixture of fair-skinned Turks and dark-skinned Dravidians. However, this mixture did not emerge in a short time, but as the result of a process that developed over centuries. The Dravidians in southern India, on the other hand, retained their bee identity. Today there are approximately 245 million Dravidian native speakers of Dravidian languages such as Kannada, Malayalam, Tamil, Telugu and Brohi, making up the majority of Southern India and Sri Lanka. There are also small Dravidian communities in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal. It is higher among South Indian societies with about 17-19. It (Y-DNA) originated in Southeast Asia. This gene is restricted to Austro-Asiatic-speaking populations in India and is found among Tibeto-Burmese males in the Himalayas and Northeast India. Austro-Asiatic languages are the majority languages of Southern China, Thailand, Vietnam, and Cambodia. Sanskrit and its contemporary forms, the Indian languages spoken in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka, can be considered a distant branch of the Turanian language cluster. In contrast, Dravidian languages spoken mostly in South India are not closely related to languages outside India. Evidence of a long-term communication between speakers of these two language clusters in India is evident from the fact that a large number of Dravidian words are found in ancient Hindu hymns such as the vedas. The Vedic Age, between 1500 BC and 500 BC, is the period when the Vedas, the oldest sacred hymns of the Hindu faith, were created. Aften vidy ('veda'), which means 'science' / 'knowledge' in Sanskrit, has been transformed from the Old Turkic word bitig, which means bitik (book), writing, document. This word is derived from the root biti, which means 'to write' in Old Turkish. Da Rigvid, which means 'the knowledge of counsel' in Sanskrit, was composed in the Punjab region around 1500 BC. Erig, meaning 'advice' in Old Turkic, has been transformed into Sanskrit as rig with this meaning. In Old Turkish plum, it means 'to warn', 'to advise', 'to suggest', 'to encourage'. Hence, Old Turkic Erig Bitig has been transformed into Sanskrit as Rig Vidy. Rig Vidy consists of 1028 composed poems clustered into 10 chapters ('mandala'). Mantal, which means 'değre' (circle) and 'region' in Old Turkish, has transformed into Sanskrit as aisct mandal, which also means these things. 27 The old Turkish word "mantal" is derived from the root man, which means 'banmak'. The two great Indian epics, the Mahabharat and the Ramayan, also appeared during this period. However, in later periods, it was transformed into a sacred literature by being rewritten and arranged and the heroes of the epic were sanctified. Thus, although they are important to literary and religious tradition, they cannot be genuinely identified with a historical period. Set in the Upper Ganj region, the Mahabharat describes the war between two related tribes. Ramayan also describes the life of Rama, an epic son of the Kosal Khanate in the Middle Ganj region. The word bag/bay/bey, which means 'big', 'great', 'sublime' in Turkish, means aimaha (big) in Sanskrit; The Old Turkic word banT, meaning 'all' / 'whole', also translated into Sanskrit as Bharat, which means 'Hindistan(India). The Sanskrit word rama has no direct meaning, but zaffera ramaniyetoa means 'delicacy'. Therefore, the word 'rama' has been transformed from the word arim /erim, which means 'behavior', 'attitude' in Old Turkish. Auryan, meaning 'journey', 'trip' and 'car' in Sanskrit, has been transformed from the Old Turkic sub-word meaning 'to turn, 'to deviate', 'to go away'. The Vedic Age includes the conflicts between the Turks and the Dravidians. In the Vedas, the Dravidians are called das, meaning 'slave'. This word has been transformed into Sanskrit from fas/taz/daz, which means 'every object is bad', 'vulgar', 'empty'. In the Vedas, Stones (Dravids) are defined as those who do not make offerings to or obey the lords' commands. The possessors, who are the holy spirits in the Tengrism belief, are today. incorrectly referred to as "gods". In the Vedas, the language of the Dravidians is called mirdhr, which means 'sweet', 'soft'. This word has been transformed from the Old Turkic word mir, which means 'honey'. [Mir has also been transformed from Turkish into Mandarin, which means 'honey' as mi.]. During the centuries-long period of mixing of Turks and Dravidians in northern India, he was greatly influenced by the phonology of Old Turkic and the radiant Dravidian language. Apart from that, Pelasg, which was the official language of the Macedonians during the Seleucid Empire (323 BC-63 BC), also influenced the Old Turkic language, and many Pelasg words were mixed into Old Turkic. Pelasg, which the Westerners forged and called "Ancient Greek", is a language that evolved from Early Turkish. Thus, a broken language emerged from the mixture of Old Turkish, Old Daravidian and Pelasg. This broken language is Sanskrit, the predecessor of modern Indian languages. This broken language, called Sanskrit (zip), continues to be widely used in Brahmin and Buddhist hymns. Sanskrit is a combination of the Old Turkic words san, which means 'respect', 'glory', 'un', and sekrit, which means 'to move' (to act) and is composed of the words 'respectable', 'sacred', 'top' (perfect), ' means 'extraordinary'. For example, amba, one of the Sanskrit words meaning 'main', comes from Early Turkish amma, Pelasg dupá amma; the other, au matr, comes from the Pelasg word páup mátir, which also means 'mother'. While this word is translated from Dravidian languages as sbor am'ma in Tamil and soda am'ma in Malalayam, in Kannada tayi and Teleguca 58 talli ___________________________( For detailed information on this subject, see. Arif Cengiz Erman, "An Introduction to Turan History", ) preserved its Dravidian structure. The Sanskrit word canani, which means 'mother', is also derived from Farça ole (see picture for the right alphabet/symbol) canan (beloved). This word, on the other hand, was translated into Persian from the word Turkish can (Old Turkish bell). Considering that Persian was a literary language created from a mixture of old Turkish and Arabic in the palace of the Turkish Ghaznavids in the 11th century and 12th century, the fact that Sanskrit completed its formation after the 13th century, when the Muslim Turks began to rule India, emerges. ATA tata, a Sanskrit word meaning 'father', is a conversion from Turkish ata and Pelasg ärra átta. The Sanskrit word api bhratr, which means 'brother', is derived from the word ppárpa frátra, which means 'brother' in Sanskrit; The word bala has been transformed from the Turkish word bala which means 'child', and the word am gav which means 'cow' has been transformed from the Turkish word kuv (bulk, large, fat). , ko (Scandinavian).]. There are many words like these that have been converted from Turkish to Sanskrit. I give a small part of these conversions as an appendix at the end of this book. European linguists who argue that Sanskrit emerged in the 5th century BC, edited Sanskrit They claim that the person was Panini, an epic personality. However, the century in which Panini lived is uncertain. It is debatable whether he even lived. Although it is debatable whether Panini's "work" is dated between the 6th and 4th centuries BC. Although it is claimed that he wrote it in the period, there is no document proving this. The oldest Sanskrit script that exists today is from 1663, unearthed in Kashmir and written on birch bark.
meine apki video watch list mei add krdi hei apke views km hei to ap yh na sochna ke apki video mei msla hei no im in love with history wo bhe muslims ki or wo bhe sultans ki history, ill watch this video aram seee abhi mere ps time nhe hei yes apki videos pr views km hein because logon ko to fazool chezain dekhni hein vlogs drama pr is trh ka content bhe less than 1% log psnd krte hein or wo aisa psnd krte hein ke wo is se addicted ho jate hein to apne yh nhe sochna ok Allah Hafiz
Hereditary rule is the cause of decline in empires! The only things I oppose against the Ottomons is that how can you follow hereditary rule if Islam doesn't allow that! I agree they accomplished great things but same is the reason for their decline!
Every Muslim empire of middle age used to follow hereditary rule. What are you talking about? Only the Rashidun didn't follow that because they are the rightly guided caliph.
Great video, i hope you make detail video about harem in the future. My first encounter about harem actually in japanese manga genre, i don't know the actual history about harem. Not to long ago, i read about orientalism and harem is one of anything western fantasies and imagination. they heard about harem and fantasized harem with their promiscuis mind and make money with their vulgar fantasies imagination about harem. there is painting about harem that look like its sultans private prostitution as harem is about everything pleasure. the painter never go to the actual harem. the "myth" about harem travel across the world, japanesse adopted it and make it worse.
Disgusting. Celebrating an empire that brought only bloodspill and brutallity to people of other religion. having them enslaved. but we stood up and that empire has fallen
You're looking too deeply into the demographics of the harems imo when the actual reason is a simple one. Most of them were eastern Europeans, and they were sought after for their beauty, that's it.
@@nearoblivion4510 its normal that beautiful ones are more demanded, which makes them expensive. Point is they can’t regularly take danish German French etc slaves that’s why Eastern Europeans and Italians was the main target.
@@faziruddin Oh, yes I agree. She was placing an emphasis on the "diversity" of the Harem and how it was deliberate etc. I was arguing against that. It was not very diverse, mostly eastern European. Just a consequence of geography and demand due to attractiveness of mostly Slavic women.
![เป็นไปได้ไหม - WanMai [Performance Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Eh5hItD4Mr0/mqdefault.jpg)
The Ottomans helped the Mughals many times with military or economic aid. The last Ottoman Sultan was the father in law of The Nizam of Hyderabad. Babur may have gotten his first artillery from the Ottomans.
Totally incorrect. Mughals were among the richest in the world. There were occasional diplomatic exchanges but no such aid you speak of. There were vast expanses of land between the two empires. Nizam of Hyderabad was an English stooge, a big ass licker. Have you seen his Emblem. Go check it.
Empires help and assist each other that is a given. Babur initially in the 1st battle of panipat was supported by ottoman cannon makers(a political move) thats about it. What came after Akbar until Aurangzeb...The ottomans ..safavids...infact no empire in the world was a match to the Mughals.
Mughal took help of many out siders to rule India like Ottomans,Safavids,afghans
Babur's early with the Ottoman dynasty were poor because Selim I provided Babur's Uzbek rival Ubaydullah Khan with powerful matchlocks and cannons. When Selim I offered Shah Babur to accept him as his rightful suzerain, Babur refused even to accept those envoys. They were not even allowed to enter Kabul
@@zwpm Mughal Empire or Saltanat e Gurkaniye, was the rightful successor of Timurid dynasty in Indian subcontinent. There could no word about comparing Mughals with any other middle eastern sultanate.
1) Mughals controlled 35% of entire economy of the world!
2) Mughals had 7 times bigger economy that Ottomans and Safavids together
3) Ottomans and Safavids were rather regional powers in the Middle East without any presence in world ocean and without any leverage to impact world events.
Respect Muslim history is very underrated and we have very good examples to share to the world one example is the civilisation in Spain and Portugal al -andalus ruled by Muslims for 800 years the best nation in Europe for hundred of years, alhambra palace
It's not just sultans, their whole bureaucratic structure was spectacularly well organised.
The cracks began to arrive in the era of Suleiman and the figure of sultan declined dramatically after him.
sounds misogyny but women started to lean in power.
That's where the fall of empire started. When you'll study about Sultans of Ottoman Empire untill Sultan Suleiman, then you'll realise the amount of damage empire got after they started lacking visionary sultans. Yes women or sulatanas does prevent empire to fell into the hands of Europe but we can't just run away from the facts. @@ferdousshiekh4893
Crazy he Suleiman took the empire to it's peak and then he himself kinda ruined it. Through many mistakes in his ending years of his reign.
You really have a good taste in history.
Seems like u learned history from genuine sources.
Well Researched video didi 👍🏽. Just keep doing well
Was quite informative for the one who is interested in the historicity of the Ottoman Empire...
Excellent video, you definitely deserve more views
I had this question stuck in my mind for many days.Thank you for making a video on this intresting topic. I would love to learn more about Ottomans. Keep it up 🤍👍
This was an awesome vid as usual. Keep this stuff up, ignore any random hate comments down below. I really agree with the part where the west wants us to forget the insane thriving of the east, it’s part of their ‘domination’ way to completely change the narrative of the thrival of the east’s past and position themselves as superior just because they had a phase of an intellectual golden age. The narrative of a people’s heritage that they embrace (and not distance themselves away from saying it’s just the past, or even worse, taking ‘false pride’ in their past like most Indians do), is very important in setting the standards of their current position in global order since they would have a ‘benchmark’ to meet.
I haven't read any hate comment, lol fake sympathy
overall she is doing great
loved the simple explanation, quite intriguing history of the ottomans
There are so many western movies on European kings and queens but I wish they had more on either ottoman rulers, middle eastern rulers, East Asian etc…. There are so many historic rulers outside of the European monarchies that have really interesting stories
Very good content. keep it up.
Excellent video. We need more such channels. Eastern stories deserve space.
Thank you! I'm glad you're enjoying. Please do share ☺️
That was how the bloody succession system worked in the Ottoman Empire. But it was not the reason the Ottoman Empire was successful. The Ottoman Empire was successful because they followed the Islamic principles of serving justice and freedom of worship to ALL citizens without bias, be they Muslim or non Muslim. This is what made them distinct from the Crusaders, the Byzantines, the Mongols, the Saffavids and all the other competing powers that failed. Marrying into the local population and promoting non elites into high ranking positions was part of that process.
Good joke😂
Mongols were more religiously tolerant before they converted to Islam. Chengez Khan and his descendants for a few generations had zero problems with religious diversity. And it were the Ottomans under whom the Christians revolted because they had second class status.
@@grapeshott wrong. The majority of the supporters of the Ottoman Empire were Christians. In fact they formed the majority of Ottoman citizens for centuries. And there was no "religous" revolt against the Ottomans. When the empire started to collapse, those who fought against it included Muslim Arabs, Muslim Bosnians. Muslim Albanians, Muslim Sudanese, Muslim Egyptions etc. As for the Mongols, they were quite well known for carrying out ethnic cleansing against Sunni Muslims. For example, the sacking of Baghdad. Ironically the majority of Mongols eventually converted to Sunni Islam after coming more into contact with Muslims.
@@AliSidTexOttomans were great warriors, they had no justice or equality , they were brutal . What's that got do to with Islamic principles
@@help123research4 the Ottomans were not superior warriors to anyone else in their region. The man reason they succeeded is because they allowed people to keep their religion, culture and language and protected them from the brutal medieval world around them. This is the reason why the former Ottoman lands are the most culturally diverse lands in the world. The same can be said for the Mughal lands.
lot of knowledge and very informative video, keep it up ❤
Great content but you are underrated....you deserve millions
Unpopular opinion: The over-involvement of women (wives/mothers/concubines) in politics is what led to the destabilization and fall of so many of these empires and dynasties, including Roman julio-claudian as well as ottoman.
Nope. You're just a sexist
agreed no doubt
If you were in their place, what would you have done to help the Ottoman Empire thrive and prevent its destabilization and fall?
Involvement of women led to some extremely successful regimes too. That cannot be the reason
Thank you for presenting such an interesting topic in such great detail. I have just finished watching the web series Payitaht: Sultan Abdul Hamid, and I was fascinated by his intelligence and strategic brilliance. I tried to research more about him, but as you mentioned, there isn’t much consolidated material available. Even where information exists, it is scattered all over the internet. I hope you make more videos on ottman Empire, especially sultan abdul hamid II. He had extraordinary political accumen, and i strongly believe that people should know about him
Great. I think you had spent a good time in Ottoman history. Explanation was clear. I like the accent, cause this is common in this subcontinent
I just watched till end... thanx for sharing the knowledge.. so i can teach to my kids how to survive in this world..
Very good video Masha'ALLAH, You just gained a subscriber.
A little correction: GulBahar wasn't Bayezid's wife but rather His mother.
There is more then one Gulbahar, I think his mother was also named Gulbahar. But the woman who had selim I was also named the same
@@TareekhiTalesVery Well, Thank You.
Very educational video. Thanks.
great video mashallah love the narration flow as well
Sister, focus on the Ottoman Empire. It definitely is going to bring you a bigger audience. You can focus on Sultan Orhan right now, as the Osman series is ending. People will naturally want to know what happens next.
Mark my word. I just watched Kurulus Osman, and your video showed up. And I understand TH-cam SEO. That's why this is my recommendation for you, though you did not ask for it. Also, Sultan Bayezid is my favorite. Bayezid the Thunderbolt who fought against Timur. Have a read; the history is better than any film story.
One more thing, you can just make an ottoman series based on each sultan. May be 3 video each. There are famous Lala nad commanders you can also include. For example, Lala Shahin pasha, Chandarly Khalil pasha, Haci Ilbey. Also, sultans like Nilufar Khatun, Gul Bahar (you already mentioned).
Good work, keep it coming
Very informative content
The Ottoman Empire is often considered the third great Islamic caliphate, following the Rashidun and Umayyad Caliphates. Unlike other empires the holy cities of Mecca and Medina, which strengthened its claim to leadership in the Muslim world
Love your videos. You are an amazing content creator.
Good work. Carry on. I want sultan Abdul hamid 2
What a great video is this. A perfect blend of knowledge and decent editing and on the top of that, the youtuber is a female which is gaining views just by sharing her knowledge with zero nu*ity and bad words.
Very informative video, Pakistan and Ottoman have always had good relations especially at the time of khalipeth and let us not forget the engineers of URDU language ottoman generals both from the religion and historical ties we are always in good alignment with our brothers and sisters from Pakistan. Love from Turkiye 🇹🇷 ❤ 🇵🇰
appreciate
Great work
During Sultan Mehmed's long 30-year reign, the Sultan not only conquered Constantinople, but spent his entire life fighting, as summarized below, viz...
1. Conquest of Constantinople (1453)
Opponent: Byzantine Emperor Constantine XI
Description: The Byzantine Empire fell with the conquest of Constantinople and it was established as the capital of the Ottomans.
2. Siege of Belgrade (1456)
Opponent: John Hunyadi, Hungarian general
Description: The Ottoman forces were not successful in this battle and it became a hindrance to their advance towards Western Europe.
3. The Morea Campaign (1458-1460)
Adversaries: Local rulers of the Byzantine peninsula
Description: The remaining Byzantine forces on the Morea Peninsula are eliminated.
4. Conquest of Trebizond (1461)
Antagonist: David Komenenos, ruler of the Trebizond Empire
Description: The remnants of the Byzantine Empire at Trebizond fall.
5. Bosnian Campaign (1463)
Opponent: King Stephen Tomasevic of Bosnia
Description: Bosnia became part of the Ottoman Empire and Ottoman power increased in the Balkans.
6Expedition to Wallachia (Moldova) (1475-1476)
Antagonist: Vlad Dracula, ruler of Wallachia
Description: Sultan Mehmed launched a campaign against Vlad, the ruler of Wallachia, but it was considered a long-term war.
7. Battle of Otluqbeli (1473)
Opponent: Ak-Koyunlu ruler Uzun Hasan
Description: Mehmed Ak-Koyunlu defeated the Empire in this battle and strengthened Ottoman influence in Eastern Anatolia.
#MehmedFetihlerSultanı
Very informative, thank you
Excellent video, great work ❤
A very detailed analysis 👍
Very informative video ❤
Nice and informative
cfbr, keep up the good work.
heyy please recommend books on the Ottoman Empire, also love ur videos so much
you have earn my respect
Amazing content
Informative ❤
Very informative video but i would suggest to be in a flow. Because the video is feels like it is boring. Add a little effects and emotions and a sequential flow to the video overall nice job.
So underrated video.
This was good
Can you recommend a books about Ottoman Empire?
amazing and very knowledgable
Make a video on the fall of ottoman empire.
After 1566 or during the reign of Sultan Murad lll they started to lack the training of young princes
Unfortunately true...
Nope. The empire generally stagnated because of the loss of hegemony over eastern trade and lagging behind the rest of Europe in technology and military organisation
These succession battles are the one of the reasons of declining of the mughal empire. And give East India Company easy access to internal matters of kingdom which eventually led to British Rule in India.
Loved it ❤ would like to train my kids the same way❤
What I've heard about sending princes to other provinces is that after sultan Suleiman when his drunk son selim II ascented to throne he didn't sent his sons to any province and it was the beginning of the destruction of Ottoman Empire. I've also heard that his son Mehmet III or murad III had 124 ladies and they were just enjoying in Palace and their vezirs were running the empire all by themselves. First 10 Sultans were the only real and most intelligent sultans of ottomans... Yes Murad VI (the brutal according to west) was the last sultan who was powerful but he was killed by his mother 😔
you are talking about murad the fourth not the sixth
and dont forget abdulhamid the second
@@AbdurrehmanRiaz-u4e Abdul hamid was a sultan which was intelligent and tried to save the empire but failed as their forefathers had destroyed it to such an extent
Hello, just one correction or addition 'killings of other siblings legalized during the reign of Sultan Beyzed Yaldrim not Mehmet the 2nd' Thanks
Yıldırım Bayezid indeed killed his own brother to take the throne but we see these dynastic murders as early as Osman Bey the founder who killed his uncle. It was the Mehmed the II who legalized murder of the brothers for sultans in order to maintain governmental power.
Ottoman Empire should be taught not because its achievements but how it ensured Muslims to fall behind in the scientific thinking by freezing the free movement of Ideas, People and goods. It created rigid structures which was modern in terms of 13th century but was one of the worst systems for 18th century.
very intersting
saw for the first time
Nice Content 👍 Keep it up .
Really smarty kingdom and sultans are very intelligent.
I can feel .. How much taste is inside n outside of you..❤
The Ottoman Caliphate represented a cohesive and disciplined governance system, functioning as a unifying force for the Muslim Ummah through the principles of Islamic brotherhood. Rather than being authoritarian, it fostered unity among Muslim regions under the guiding ethos of mutual solidarity and collective responsibility.
Bullshit
It was not efficient outside of anatolia
The empire was good when it faced much smaller and weaker disunited and backward european states of medieval times
But those states saw their flaws and improved
Ottomans didn’t. They continued ruling in a medieval state up until mid 19th century with tax farmers and segregated laws
@@supersuper111 On the contrary, the biggest revolts, the Celali revolts, originated from Anatolia.
The Ottoman Empire treated non-Muslims as second class citizens. That’s partly why so many revolts happened by Xtians
@@ssmot113 The Ottoman Empire treated Non-Muslims better compared to those in Medieval Europe. But it is true that non-Muslims are second-class citizens. With the Decrees of the Tanzimat(1839), the inequality between Non-Muslims and Muslims decreased. The Greeks and Armenians became the richest people. The trade was carried out by them. Everyone knows what happened to the Jews in Spain. It was the Ottomans who saved the Jews. The Balkans could have been completely Turkish. This was also not done.
wow mesha it was great
Appreciate your lucid presentation. But just a little correction; you are pronouncing Baa Yazeed as Bayzid.
Insightful
Can you guide me on how they would be trained and educated about different matters, any expert recommendation will be helpful in terms of the curriculum for those princes
You can find more details in the sources I have listed, in the description box
@@TareekhiTales thanks
if ottomans were that strict about their next sultans then why did the empire fall, i know there are many reasons like Economic difficulties & scabbing but if they were trained that hard then how they missed these basic points?
قال تعالى لكل امة اجل
Later they Weren't that strict..I mean.. Sultan ahmed Didn't had strict training I guess
wow. very interesting
if you add more pictures in videos in would be more amazing video to watch
Provide me with book resources related to the Ottoman Empire
Your program are decent.
decent lady u r
Sorry but this video is flawed from the start. Selim I's mother Ayşe (Gülbahar) Hatun was the daughter of Alauddevle Bozkurt Beg, Beg of Dulkadirs, so no her father didnt convert to Islam and sent her daughter to harem while aiming to be next sultan's grandfather.
As the video progresses, you made it sound as if princes mother's are the one who educate them, princes would have numerous tutors and they are the one actually taught stuff to them. Also princes mother's doesnt govern their sanjaks, its prince's tutors who governed the sanjak on the behalf of princes until they are old enough to do it themselves.
And no Sultans didnt took concubines from minorities to help their sons understand the issues of the minorites through their mothers, its done because those woman was daughters of nobodies, since being wife or mother of a sultan is a useful position, their families would have exploit her relationship with sultan, To prevent that Ottomans took concubines.
The most important times the world has ever had had . Europe knows that very well - and so does world historians - the problem is they were afraid of the Muslim influence .
There are valid criticisms in the comment section about Pakistanis learning Ottoman history so seriously, as if its their own national heritage. Yes, every school worldwide learn about history of foreign countries like USA, France, Russia, Japan, etc, but most dont attach a national pride to it. Pakistanis attach a national pride to Ottoman history, even if they had very little to do with South Asia.
Ottoman ruled in the south asia
“Valid criticisms”? What exactly does that mean. People derive heritage, identity and values from a plethora of sources in the modern world. While the whole world is busy chasing after western cultural and civilisational idioms, what’s wrong with any nation chasing after Ottoman (or any other) cultural or civilisational idioms?
Pakistani are so interested in history of ottoman empire because of Turkish series Kurulus Osman and ottoman empire was last Islamic caliphate
And all the West isnt idealizing ancient Greece offcourse and nowadays Israel. Because off an so called shared Judeo/Christian heritage.
Munafiqeen will never be happy if muslims keep ethnicities aside and maintain brotherhood based on islam
Can YOU post what was about hurrem's sons she had several prince.
It gives me goosebumps when I think about faith sultan Mehmet
Sultan mehmed 2 stopped and abondoned the practice of killing brothers after taking the throne
No he didnt. It was because he didnt have any brothers to kill. Most of them died young. Plus mehmed the second even ruled for few years even when his father Murad 2 was still alive.
@taminahhzz4496 ye to apne meri knowledge me izafa kia hai 😀
Go get some education and see what I mentioned again
@ Dont know What language you are speaking or your reading comprehension is below average. MEHMET THE SECOND (2) aka MEHMET the conquerer was the one who created the law of fracticide also known as killing the princes so there will be no civil war within the empire just like it happend between MEHMET the First and his bother during the ottoman Interregum aka civil war in 1402-1413. MEHMET THE SECOND ruled twice once during when his Father Sultan Murad || was alive, at the years 1444 - 1446 and he ruled again after his Father Sultan Murad || died in 1451 and he didnt have brothers at that time… you should go read some history books before you comment on here and increase in your understanding on it.
بر صغیر میں انگریزوں نے پابندی لگائی تھی, دولت عثمانیہ کی تاریخ پڑھانے سے کیونکہ ترکوں نے یورپ میں سلطنت قائم کی تھی یہ بات ان سے برداشت نہیں ہوتی,
Where are you from?
There should be a discipline in training a child and youth... It doesn't even matter which background just A.
Make videos for sultan abdul hamid ❤
Ah, the greatest Sultan to ever lived!
It is an ancient manuscript. Thus, the existence of a person named Panini goes no further than epic. Prest PLEARS There is a great deal of falsification regarding the manuscript Panini from 1663 found in Kashmir. There is a grammar book written by a person whose period is unknown. However, there is no such ending. There is also no document proving that Panini is alive. The claim reads: "Since the nineteenth European scholars found and published Panini's work, Panini has been affirmed as the first linguist and father of linguistics." It is claimed that Panini wrote this book around 500 BC. However, there is no text or writing left from that period. There is only one manuscript dating from AD 1663. From this, it is understood that the oral hymn, which is claimed to be the epic person named Panini, was first written down in 1663. Hence, this written language is 17th century Sanskrit. Panini is an epic person like our Korkut Ata (Dede Korkut). Korkut Ata, in the ancient epics of the Oghuz Turks (page 31)
He is a wise person who was glorified and sanctified and a poet who is supposed to tell the ancient epics of the Turks. It is unclear whether he ever lived or not. There is no information about his life. The oldest source that mentions Korkut Ata is the ending Câmi el Tevârih of the Ilkhanid prime minister (vizier) Reşidüddin Fazullah Hamedani (1247 - 1318). The epic of Korkut Ata was written down several times by unknown authors in the 14th or 15th century. The name of the manuscript in Dresden is "Kitab-ı Dedem Korkud Ala Lisan-1 Täife-i Oğuzân", the name of the manuscript in the Vatican is "Hikayet-i Oğuznâme, Kazan Beğ ve Gayri". Now, if we say that Korkut Ata is the oldest linguist or the father of linguistics, we would be bogus. However, Mahmud of Kashgar is the oldest known linguist on earth and the true father of linguistics. Because he wrote the oldest known dictionary between 1072-1074. With extensive explanations and grammatical explanations. This dictionary named "Divan-1 Lugat el Türk" is Turkish-Arabic. European scientists engage in genealogy (racism). This is a fascist understanding of science. The so-called European linguists, who put forward the fabricated "Indo-European language" thesis, try to make a manuscript that is about four hundred years old look like it is thousands of years old in order to cover it up. Because, according to European linguists, Sanskrit "is a classical language spoken in South Asia from the Indo-Aryan branch of the Indo-European languages, and originated by spreading from the north to South Asia in the late Bronze Age." The Late Bronze Age is the name given to the period between 1500 BC and 1200 BC. The north of India is Central Asia, the homeland of the Turks. In short, the dimensions of falsification are that wide. The hymn called segurft astadhyayi (eighth chapter), allegedly written by Panini, is the argued to be oldest surviving hymn Sanskrit grammar writings. However, there is no written document. There are hyms that have been handed down only orally from generation to generation, not a written document. Those who try to deceive them as if they are written documents are only committing fraud. There is also no documented script in Sanskrit. It is claimed to have been first written in various Brahmi scripts in the late 1st millennium AD, but there is no evidence or documentation. Sanskrit was written in the Devanagari script in the contemporary period. There is no written document remaining from this language, which is called "Vedic Sanskrit" and is claimed to cover the period between 1500 BC and 500 BC. The Vedas have been orally transmitted from generation to generation for centuries. The oldest written farewells found today are manuscripts written in the Devangari script of the early 19th century, called 'Rigveda' (Sanskrit: Rigvidy). However, European scholars argue that the Rigveda is the oldest known Sanskrit script. However, the Rigveda was also transmitted orally until the beginning of the 19th century. Devangari script, which is claimed to have emerged in the 7th century, is the script known today as Indian script. However, it is not known exactly when the Devangari script was formed. Duismeism (fraud) in the field of "written documents" does not end there, either. It is claimed that Kalidasa, who is said to be the greatest Sanskrit playwright, wrote in classical Sanskrit and laid the foundations of modern sang (arithmetic) in this language. However, it is not known in which age he lived, and there is no information about his life. The exact period of his "writing" is also unknown, but it is suggested that it was probably written before the 5th century AD. But again, there is no written document. There are only küğs (hymns). The two great Sanskrit epics, the Mahabarat and the Ramayana, are also a series of oral hymns. (Page 33)
European pseudo-linguists and inspired by Indian linguists refer to the local languages spoken in the Indian subcontinent from the 3rd century BC to the 8th century AD as Prakrit. He also defines Sanskrit as a standardized language used by ancient Indian khanates for literary, official and religious purposes. Prakrit is a word taken from Sanskrit. The Sanskrit word ri prakrit means 'rough', 'primitive', 'low', 'natural'. This word has been transformed into Sanskrit from the Old Turkic word birg, which means 'dirty', 'not pure', 'stool', 'dirt'. However, there is no written document between the 3rd century BC and the 8th century AD. Existing "Prakrit" manuscripts date from between 1300 AD and 1800 AD. It is assumed that these manuscripts were copied from earlier manuscripts. To make such a claim without any written documents dating from the 3rd century BC to the 8th century AD is unscientific and fraudulent. Linguistics cannot be built on assumptions, and anyone who tries to do so is at odds with science. The formation of Hindi and its dialects took quite a long time. The formation of Sanskrit, a divine language, took place in parallel with this. This formation process, which started with the influence of Turkish from Daravidian, then continued with the influence of Pelasg and finally completed its formation with the influence of Arabic and Persian. The first Muslim Turkish rule, the Delhi Sultanate, included present-day Northern India, Pakistan, Nepal, and Bangladesh. During the Delhi Sultanate, the Hindustani language, which was spoken as a lingua franca, emerged in Northern India, which consisted of these lands. Present-day Hindi, Nepali, Bengali, Urdu and other Indian languages are variants of the Hindustani language. These languages are close to each other and are generally mutually intelligible. page 34
Part 3 of Transformation/Reset Of Tatars To Indians.
Linguist Researcher Arif Cengiz Erman's book North Indian peoples origin.
Küzey Hint Toplukların Kökeni
I would gift u 100 dollars. But i don't have it. I pray Allah to gift you hundred & hundreds of dollars.
Dear, please keep grifting us videos like those. Love from Bangladesh ❤
I'm a Turkish girl and I can say it's okay to despise harem system, people try to sugarcoat it by saying it was a place of learning and so on but every monarchy holds their prestigious education nevertheless. Education of heirs is everybody's concern for all monarchs on Earth, have you played Crusader Kings before? Harem is a system of abuse, locking kidnapped women made sex slaves. It's better to have Ulugh Beg,Sultan Alparslan or Omar Khayyam born out of nikah instead of sultans born out of concubineage, morally at least. Ottoman state was glorious but machiavellian just as much. Turkic state structure always included influencial empresses, focus on formal marriage mind you. Ottomans breached it fearing another dynasty will contest their power but harem system is still disguisting.
Being Muslim we should learn n understand Muslim history .. what’s wrong in owning Muslim history . All the Christian countries on the contrary carry their faith and interests both gracefully n rigidly. It’s ironic that we Muslims are always targeted even just for talking about Muslim empires in different eras .
Its very unknown fact that some of the most famous muslim empires were not muslims majority.
You are the witness of that era, who conquered Islambul.
Roman Caesar Sultan mehmed the conqueror
#MehmedFetihlerSultanı
The Formation Of Sanskrit Language. part1
The very first Tatar kingdoms İn India is the: (and all of them were Turkish administrations with their Real Tatar/Turkish Names.
Never in Hindistan History Others then the Turks Ruled.
Delete also the words Mongols, Persians, Chinees, Slavs, Celts, Europeans.. out of your memory... actually the list is much longer.. These were/are all Turks
Kuru Khanate,
then the
Sixteen (16) Khanate,
(after the union of the smaller khanates).
Magad Khanate.
Morya (Maurya Empire) Khanate, Satavhana (includes the word Han) Khanate,
India Sak (Saka/Scythian Turks) Khanate,
and then The KusHan or Kuşan Khanate.
Then, AK Hun Khanate.. More precisely AK Kun (Sun/Day) Khanate..
Watka Khanate,
Kurça Khaganate,
After the..... .. Khanate,
The Delhi Sultanate,
The Halac period,
The Tugluks period,
The Sa(E)yyids period,
the Bengal Sultanate,
the Baybarli Sultanate,
Then the British colonialism and frauds are coming, they are doing their best not to call/count them as Turks..
Politics of erasing Tatars/Turks from history.. (I will add a summery of what exactly the Brits did how long these dynasties lasted why they ended and why and when an other arrised)
I will add later writing/articles passages from books about their religion similarities with Tengrism religion, exactly the same: evolved much later in to (actually just called Hinduism and after Budha Buddhism.. and articles of each of those khaganates and a summery from Turkish historians..
I have gathered already tens of articles adding to this narrative for who want to know more about it pls check my group The Turkic Origin of Indian societies and the formation of their languages for more articles about this subject.
×××××××÷
From Arif Cengiz Erman's book.
The location of the BMAC, Andronovo and Yaz Tepe civilizations
(camera translation)
The Dravidians were the indigenous people of the Indian subcontinent. As the Turks spread from the Indus Valley into the interior of India, the Indian elgini (ethno) was formed in northern India from a mixture of fair-skinned Turks and dark-skinned Dravidians. However, this mixture did not emerge in a short time, but as the result of a process that developed over centuries. The Dravidians in southern India, on the other hand, retained their bee identity. Today there are approximately 245 million Dravidian native speakers of Dravidian languages such as Kannada, Malayalam, Tamil, Telugu and Brohi, making up the majority of Southern India and Sri Lanka. There are also small Dravidian communities in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal.
It is higher among South Indian societies with about 17-19. It (Y-DNA) originated in Southeast Asia. This gene is restricted to Austro-Asiatic-speaking populations in India and is found among Tibeto-Burmese males in the Himalayas and Northeast India. Austro-Asiatic languages are the majority languages of Southern China, Thailand, Vietnam, and Cambodia. Sanskrit and its contemporary forms, the Indian languages spoken in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka, can be considered a distant branch of the Turanian language cluster. In contrast, Dravidian languages spoken mostly in South India are not closely related to languages outside India. Evidence of a long-term communication between speakers of these two language clusters in India is evident from the fact that a large number of Dravidian words are found in ancient Hindu hymns such as the vedas. The Vedic Age, between 1500 BC and 500 BC, is the period when the Vedas, the oldest sacred hymns of the Hindu faith, were created. Aften vidy ('veda'), which means 'science' / 'knowledge' in Sanskrit, has been transformed from the Old Turkic word bitig, which means bitik (book), writing, document. This word is derived from the root biti, which means 'to write' in Old Turkish. Da Rigvid, which means 'the knowledge of counsel' in Sanskrit, was composed in the Punjab region around 1500 BC. Erig, meaning 'advice' in Old Turkic, has been transformed into Sanskrit as rig with this meaning. In Old Turkish plum, it means 'to warn', 'to advise', 'to suggest', 'to encourage'. Hence, Old Turkic Erig Bitig has been transformed into Sanskrit as Rig Vidy. Rig Vidy consists of 1028 composed poems clustered into 10 chapters ('mandala'). Mantal, which means 'değre' (circle) and 'region' in Old Turkish, has transformed into Sanskrit as aisct mandal, which also means these things. 27
The old Turkish word "mantal" is derived from the root man, which means 'banmak'. The two great Indian epics, the Mahabharat and the Ramayan, also appeared during this period. However, in later periods, it was transformed into a sacred literature by being rewritten and arranged and the heroes of the epic were sanctified. Thus, although they are important to literary and religious tradition, they cannot be genuinely identified with a historical period. Set in the Upper Ganj region, the Mahabharat describes the war between two related tribes. Ramayan also describes the life of Rama, an epic son of the Kosal Khanate in the Middle Ganj region. The word bag/bay/bey, which means 'big', 'great', 'sublime' in Turkish, means aimaha (big) in Sanskrit; The Old Turkic word banT, meaning 'all' / 'whole', also translated into Sanskrit as Bharat, which means 'Hindistan(India). The Sanskrit word rama has no direct meaning, but zaffera ramaniyetoa means 'delicacy'. Therefore, the word 'rama' has been transformed from the word arim /erim, which means 'behavior', 'attitude' in Old Turkish. Auryan, meaning 'journey', 'trip' and 'car' in Sanskrit, has been transformed from the Old Turkic sub-word meaning 'to turn, 'to deviate', 'to go away'. The Vedic Age includes the conflicts between the Turks and the Dravidians. In the Vedas, the Dravidians are called das, meaning 'slave'. This word has been transformed into Sanskrit from fas/taz/daz, which means 'every object is bad', 'vulgar', 'empty'. In the Vedas, Stones (Dravids) are defined as those who do not make offerings to or obey the lords' commands. The possessors, who are the holy spirits in the Tengrism belief, are today.
incorrectly referred to as "gods". In the Vedas, the language of the Dravidians is called mirdhr, which means 'sweet', 'soft'. This word has been transformed from the Old Turkic word mir, which means 'honey'. [Mir has also been transformed from Turkish into Mandarin, which means 'honey' as mi.]. During the centuries-long period of mixing of Turks and Dravidians in northern India, he was greatly influenced by the phonology of Old Turkic and the radiant Dravidian language. Apart from that, Pelasg, which was the official language of the Macedonians during the Seleucid Empire (323 BC-63 BC), also influenced the Old Turkic language, and many Pelasg words were mixed into Old Turkic. Pelasg, which the Westerners forged and called "Ancient Greek", is a language that evolved from Early Turkish. Thus, a broken language emerged from the mixture of Old Turkish, Old Daravidian and Pelasg. This broken language is Sanskrit, the predecessor of modern Indian languages. This broken language, called Sanskrit (zip), continues to be widely used in Brahmin and Buddhist hymns. Sanskrit is a combination of the Old Turkic words san, which means 'respect', 'glory', 'un', and sekrit, which means 'to move' (to act) and is composed of the words 'respectable', 'sacred', 'top' (perfect), ' means 'extraordinary'. For example, amba, one of the Sanskrit words meaning 'main', comes from Early Turkish amma, Pelasg dupá amma; the other, au matr, comes from the Pelasg word páup mátir, which also means 'mother'. While this word is translated from Dravidian languages as sbor am'ma in Tamil and soda am'ma in Malalayam, in Kannada tayi and Teleguca 58 talli ___________________________( For detailed information on this subject, see. Arif Cengiz Erman, "An Introduction to Turan History", )
preserved its Dravidian structure. The Sanskrit word canani, which means 'mother', is also derived from Farça ole (see picture for the right alphabet/symbol) canan (beloved). This word, on the other hand, was translated into Persian from the word Turkish can (Old Turkish bell). Considering that Persian was a literary language created from a mixture of old Turkish and Arabic in the palace of the Turkish Ghaznavids in the 11th century and 12th century, the fact that Sanskrit completed its formation after the 13th century, when the Muslim Turks began to rule India, emerges. ATA tata, a Sanskrit word meaning 'father', is a conversion from Turkish ata and Pelasg ärra átta. The Sanskrit word api bhratr, which means 'brother', is derived from the word ppárpa frátra, which means 'brother' in Sanskrit; The word bala has been transformed from the Turkish word bala which means 'child', and the word am gav which means 'cow' has been transformed from the Turkish word kuv (bulk, large, fat). , ko (Scandinavian).]. There are many words like these that have been converted from Turkish to Sanskrit. I give a small part of these conversions as an appendix at the end of this book. European linguists who argue that Sanskrit emerged in the 5th century BC, edited Sanskrit They claim that the person was Panini, an epic personality. However, the century in which Panini lived is uncertain. It is debatable whether he even lived. Although it is debatable whether Panini's "work" is dated between the 6th and 4th centuries BC. Although it is claimed that he wrote it in the period, there is no document proving this. The oldest Sanskrit script that exists today is from 1663, unearthed in Kashmir and written on birch bark.
My Fvrt empire 🇹🇷🤍
How to whitewash barbaric, misogynistic, and autocratic rulers : 101
to good
I don't know what it is all about, I just subscribed because of your cuteness.
Please tell about Sultan Sulaiman Khan and his married concubine Hurrem
meine apki video watch list mei add krdi hei apke views km hei to ap yh na sochna ke apki video mei msla hei no im in love with history wo bhe muslims ki or wo bhe sultans ki history, ill watch this video aram seee abhi mere ps time nhe hei
yes apki videos pr views km hein because logon ko to fazool chezain dekhni hein vlogs drama pr is trh ka content bhe less than 1% log psnd krte hein or wo aisa psnd krte hein ke wo is se addicted ho jate hein to apne yh nhe sochna ok
Allah Hafiz
They were good, Until Timur Happened, who nearly wiped them out & still they bounced back!
I love you ❤️😗❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️,
I love you 💓💓😘😘😘
Hereditary rule is the cause of decline in empires! The only things I oppose against the Ottomons is that how can you follow hereditary rule if Islam doesn't allow that! I agree they accomplished great things but same is the reason for their decline!
Every Muslim empire of middle age used to follow hereditary rule. What are you talking about? Only the Rashidun didn't follow that because they are the rightly guided caliph.
Great video, i hope you make detail video about harem in the future. My first encounter about harem actually in japanese manga genre, i don't know the actual history about harem. Not to long ago, i read about orientalism and harem is one of anything western fantasies and imagination. they heard about harem and fantasized harem with their promiscuis mind and make money with their vulgar fantasies imagination about harem. there is painting about harem that look like its sultans private prostitution as harem is about everything pleasure. the painter never go to the actual harem. the "myth" about harem travel across the world, japanesse adopted it and make it worse.
Your story is not for all sultan its most probably is some med of sualtan
Disgusting. Celebrating an empire that brought only bloodspill and brutallity to people of other religion. having them enslaved. but we stood up and that empire has fallen
You're looking too deeply into the demographics of the harems imo when the actual reason is a simple one. Most of them were eastern Europeans, and they were sought after for their beauty, that's it.
What she says about concubines are incorrect. Eastern European concubines were taken because it was possible geographically.
@@faziruddin Also due to demand. You can look at the price differences between women from there and other regions.
@@nearoblivion4510 its normal that beautiful ones are more demanded, which makes them expensive. Point is they can’t regularly take danish German French etc slaves that’s why Eastern Europeans and Italians was the main target.
@@faziruddin Oh, yes I agree. She was placing an emphasis on the "diversity" of the Harem and how it was deliberate etc. I was arguing against that. It was not very diverse, mostly eastern European. Just a consequence of geography and demand due to attractiveness of mostly Slavic women.
@ I mean, she’s wrong through all of the video …
Agar urdu mei video bna leti to zayada mza ata, Americans nay yay video ni dekhni, hm ny dekhni ha, akal kro
Tareekhi tales urdu bhe hai channel. Dekh lo ja kar