Great review. Simply the best auto cinematography there is! Is the CX-5 just that good or did Mazda miss on the 50? My theory, and its theory only, is that Mazda will continue to make the CX-50 the rough and tumble outdoorsy one while the CX-5 will be the fun to drive elegant one. The interior of the CX-5 is still one of the best in the industry. I don’t think a CX-5 redesign will come until they have new drivetrains for it. A mild 48 V hybrid CX-90 derived 4 cylinder would be quite intriguing.
Thanks! I got really lucky with the fog & morning sun on that day. In my opinion, the CX-50 isn't even that much of an outdoorsy vehicle. Yea it has more ground clearance, but it's done through the use of big wheels and it has low profile tires. It's not proper off-road equipment. Everything else is basically the same as the CX-5 just at a higher cost. I do hope that the next gen CX-5 will have at least a 48Volt mild-hybrid (or a PHEV option). They have to in today's market.
Great video. Love the details you put into creating it. Very informative as well. I finally made a decision and going with the 2024 Mazda CX-5 2.5 Turbo Premium AWD in Machine Gray Metallic. Paying in cash. Should be here within the next three weeks. Can't wait!
I looked at both CX-50 and CX-5 last month when our 21 y/o mini van died. We went for the CX-5 finally because it is better cost/feature worthy towards the CX-50. We picked the base trim without turbo/sun roof/ i-stop functions, not only we don't need them(1st 2 features) but we just hate the i-stop. It's been a month now and we are very happy with the CX-5's performance for daily drive around town. Hi-way merging is no problem at all when I floored the gas pedal and if we have pax sitting at the back row(heavy load) just click the Mi-drive sw to sport and it would roar at your command. Overall the build quality and handling is top-notch and almost perfect( it would be if it has the Hybrid option, hope they will come soon)
I think Mazda shouldnt stop the CX5. The turbo more satisfying to drive than the base Macan, while being insanely more reliable and practical. The steering is the best of any crossover period and its well build and looks great
CX5 defintiely is a better design than the CX50 which is more of a raised wagon ( like the Subaru Outback) than a SUV. After owing my 2018 CX5 GT for 6 years, I still think that CX5 is still the best SUV in its class for driving dynamics, interior quality and NVH. Waht it lacks for 20224 is the choice of a hybrid power train in addition to the base and turbo engines.
@carenthusiast4984 ok, a quick Google search has yielded some answers. Yes, the CX50 has a twin-scroll turbo vs a dynamic pressure turbo in the CX5. But here's an interesting quote: "Mazda engineers say the Dynamic Pressure Turbo achieves a 20 to 25 per cent quicker response than a twin-scroll turbocharger at engine speeds below 1500rpm to produce a power delivery equivalent of a larger displacement, naturally aspirated engine." www.drivencarguide.co.nz/news/turbo-system-a-world-first/
The car dealers here in Ireland will not trade them pity as they are lovely and comfortable in fairness I have not heard of any problems with the petrol Mazdas .
Stunning cinematography with that sunlight through the fog! great video
Great review. Simply the best auto cinematography there is! Is the CX-5 just that good or did Mazda miss on the 50? My theory, and its theory only, is that Mazda will continue to make the CX-50 the rough and tumble outdoorsy one while the CX-5 will be the fun to drive elegant one. The interior of the CX-5 is still one of the best in the industry. I don’t think a CX-5 redesign will come until they have new drivetrains for it. A mild 48 V hybrid CX-90 derived 4 cylinder would be quite intriguing.
Thanks! I got really lucky with the fog & morning sun on that day.
In my opinion, the CX-50 isn't even that much of an outdoorsy vehicle. Yea it has more ground clearance, but it's done through the use of big wheels and it has low profile tires. It's not proper off-road equipment. Everything else is basically the same as the CX-5 just at a higher cost. I do hope that the next gen CX-5 will have at least a 48Volt mild-hybrid (or a PHEV option). They have to in today's market.
Great video. Love the details you put into creating it. Very informative as well. I finally made a decision and going with the 2024 Mazda CX-5 2.5 Turbo Premium AWD in Machine Gray Metallic. Paying in cash. Should be here within the next three weeks. Can't wait!
I looked at both CX-50 and CX-5 last month when our 21 y/o mini van died. We went for the CX-5 finally because it is better cost/feature worthy towards the CX-50. We picked the base trim without turbo/sun roof/ i-stop functions, not only we don't need them(1st 2 features) but we just hate the i-stop. It's been a month now and we are very happy with the CX-5's performance for daily drive around town. Hi-way merging is no problem at all when I floored the gas pedal and if we have pax sitting at the back row(heavy load) just click the Mi-drive sw to sport and it would roar at your command. Overall the build quality and handling is top-notch and almost perfect( it would be if it has the Hybrid option, hope they will come soon)
Your reviews and videos are top notch. I enjoy watching your videos. When are you reviewing the cx 90?
Thanks!
Yes I did. I reviewed the I6 MHEV: th-cam.com/video/pjtqJZwkUIc/w-d-xo.html
And the PHEV: th-cam.com/video/mdRXiOR_4Yg/w-d-xo.html
I think Mazda shouldnt stop the CX5. The turbo more satisfying to drive than the base Macan, while being insanely more reliable and practical. The steering is the best of any crossover period and its well build and looks great
CX5 defintiely is a better design than the CX50 which is more of a raised wagon ( like the Subaru Outback) than a SUV. After owing my 2018 CX5 GT for 6 years, I still think that CX5 is still the best SUV in its class for driving dynamics, interior quality and NVH. Waht it lacks for 20224 is the choice of a hybrid power train in addition to the base and turbo engines.
Any unforeseen issues with your CX-5?
Canadians have an excellent new car market it seems their price is lowest ive ever seen. In Australia similar turbo model is $38,500 Usd. (57.5K aud)
I find that the CX-50 feels more powerful than the 5. The turbo is different and it’s quite noticeable.
But it's not. They're identical engines & transmissions.
@@MGReviewsBlog the turbo chargers are different.
@@carenthusiast4984 do you have info to back that up? The only thing I was able to find is that the final drive is different between the cars.
@@MGReviewsBlog it has a twin scroll turbo.
@carenthusiast4984 ok, a quick Google search has yielded some answers. Yes, the CX50 has a twin-scroll turbo vs a dynamic pressure turbo in the CX5. But here's an interesting quote: "Mazda engineers say the Dynamic Pressure Turbo achieves a 20 to 25 per cent quicker response than a twin-scroll turbocharger at engine speeds below 1500rpm to produce a power delivery equivalent of a larger displacement, naturally aspirated engine."
www.drivencarguide.co.nz/news/turbo-system-a-world-first/
Mazda CX5 2016 The worst car I have ever owned the 2.2 deisel engine have such a bad rep none of the dealerships will take them .
Ahhh yes, that brief period it had a diesel engine. What went wrong with it or did it just get a bad reputation due to the fact it was a diesel?
Seems to just the 2.2 deisel engines
The car dealers here in Ireland will not trade them pity as they are lovely and comfortable in fairness I have not heard of any problems with the petrol Mazdas .