Rick Roderick on Hegel and Modern Life [full length]

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.พ. 2025
  • This video is 5th in the 8-part lecture series Philosophy and Human Values (1990).
    Thanks to rickroderick.org for making this available. I'm merely interested in redistributing to anyone who might enjoy and benefit.
    I. Hegel was conservative.
    A. The culmination of this long historical process is that history proper came to an end.
    B. Right wing Hegelians took Hegel to be fundamentally right and therefore applied his method over and over.
    C. To left wing Hegelians such as Marx Hegel's is a classic text but has an ambiguous legacy.
    II. Marx criticized capitalism.
    A. A criticism of capitalism is a criticism of Hegel because for Hegel, capitalism coupled with liberal democracy is the highest achievement of humanity.
    B. The democratic state is in contradiction with the imperatives of the capitalist economy.
    1. We are used to these contradiction in our current society. This was not true in Marx's time.
    2. The secret of capitalism is the shift in identity from what you are in a society to what you own or have.
    C. Marx identified several effects of capitalism.
    1. It reduces human needs to those which can be bought and sold in the market place.
    2. It produces from nature more technological abilities than in all of history.
    3. These come into contradiction because of the imperative of the economy to make a profit and to fulfill nil these new needs.
    III. Marx's ideology:
    A. If you really want to know how someone thinks, look at their surroundings. This outlook, "materialism," criticized ideas by examining.
    B. Moral or philosophical clilemnas must be understood in terms of being different for different classes.
    C. There is a difference between a theoretical approach and an approach rooted in daily life.
    D. You must not let your life be reduced to poverty or work.
    E. Before moral problems arise, there are preconditions for human life that have to be fulfilled such as food, shelter, health care and freedom to pursue other goals besides work.

ความคิดเห็น • 309

  • @eudemaniac
    @eudemaniac ปีที่แล้ว +40

    27:56 The absolute moral clarity of this moment actually sent chills down my spine. Rick was clearly an affable guy - political and opinionated, but charming enough to get his digs in without turning off his auddience. But for just a moment at the end of this lexture series, he just throws down his gloves and smacks us with the truth we Americans will do anything to avoid acknowledging. Its a message as true in 1990 as it was in 1960 and sadly still is in 2023.

  • @Deantrey
    @Deantrey 8 ปีที่แล้ว +184

    "If you live by an ideology the most dangerous ideology to you is your own, because someone may expect you to do what you say."
    God dam... he could have just dropped the mic and went home right there. Words can't express how true I have found this statement to be in my own experience.

    • @robertgreenwood2258
      @robertgreenwood2258 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      ideology is an empty term. @@boris3866

    • @boris3866
      @boris3866 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@robertgreenwood2258 Would you elaborate? I'm not sure about its meaning yet, but it has to at least refer to a set of shared ideas, an interpretative frame, containing a normative dimension.

    • @boris3866
      @boris3866 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@robertgreenwood2258 Perhaps you mean something like the term is always used by someone outside of the frame itself, so it's nothing more than verbal weaponry. I'm curious.

    • @robertgreenwood2258
      @robertgreenwood2258 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      yes thats what i meant. just misused very often

    • @robertgreenwood2258
      @robertgreenwood2258 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      i said "its an empty term
      because Rick Roderick says that exact line contradicting himself and it is pure genius. he's just rambling and holding two thoughts at the same time for fun .. its a great moment in the video.. thats all i was doing was quoting him .. should have mentioned it was his quote in original comment my bad.. anyways i know what you mean totally and i think Rick did too even though he contradicted himself for the heck of looking down the other end of the argument.. cheers mate for the good convo! i love rick and his videos / lectures are amazing!@Oners82

  • @Nikh__
    @Nikh__ ปีที่แล้ว +28

    "It’s not utopian to demand that in a world with this kind of technology, that as a moral demand, a society feed, clothe and house its people. A society that doesn’t do it, with the kind of technology and the wealth we have is beneath contempt and makes a mockery of all the previous history of civilization."
    Even after years I couldn't forget this quote. He said that in the 90s.

    • @molochfrolics8443
      @molochfrolics8443 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Marx said it in many more words, in the 1840s

  • @DavidE-jd3ze
    @DavidE-jd3ze 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This talk represents the best of Rick Roderick: fierce moral and social critic, passionate humanitarian, philosopher as interpreter and judge of their time, proletarian preacher and sage in the street, antithesis to a loafer in the museum of knowledge.

  • @davidfoust9767
    @davidfoust9767 5 ปีที่แล้ว +97

    This lecture so clearly identifies the sickness of our society. It is eerie at the end to hear the name of our current president mentioned.

    • @enzogonzales608
      @enzogonzales608 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      definitely did a double take. if he wins this election somehow, the system is truly irreparable and will either kill us or be killed by us.

    • @s1lentsound
      @s1lentsound 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And Biden has made it all the worse . Is there any hope ?

    • @davidfoust9767
      @davidfoust9767 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@s1lentsound there's always some hope, but it's tough for sure. I do think US hegemony is weakening and in a long time that could lead to change in the US.

    • @neurojitsu
      @neurojitsu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@davidfoust9767 in the UK we're still playing 'catch-up'...

    • @nickolasconnor3661
      @nickolasconnor3661 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      sorry to be so off topic but does anybody know a tool to log back into an instagram account??
      I was dumb forgot my password. I love any tricks you can give me

  • @patriceortovent6451
    @patriceortovent6451 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Mr.Rick Roderick was one of the few most human intellectual America ever had. His lectures in philosophy and philosophers were most enlightening. Sadly missed by many around the world.

  • @jimmyn9259
    @jimmyn9259 11 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    This is the best lecture I have ever seen/heard.

  • @achraf-g-idrissi
    @achraf-g-idrissi ปีที่แล้ว +1

    “Philosophy, at its best, should be our time comprehended in thought” beautifully articulated.

  • @MrMnoorist
    @MrMnoorist 10 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    The last minute of this lecture is very powerful.
    rick is Americas most profound philosopher. All of his lectures are a deep meditations on the human condition,

    • @jonhellstrom1411
      @jonhellstrom1411 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree! I was moved to tears.

    • @Maziedivision
      @Maziedivision 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But he's not a "philosopher" . He is a professor of philosophy.

    • @crsbeats5509
      @crsbeats5509 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Maziedivision i disagree, he juggles around these philosophies like they each are a pair of glasses. In one moment he observes our society through the eyes of Hegel, in the next he puts on his Foucault glasses and in any case he gives striking and precise critics of the presence. He might not be an extremely innovative or outstanding philosopher, but he defenitely is one. I mean really, what‘s the big difference between him teaching thousands about Hegel, Marx and many more while critisizing the presence and Sokrates teaching the youth on the athenian market?

    • @Enjoyer5222
      @Enjoyer5222 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That last moment was the weakest moment. Karl Marx opposes turning things into monetary exchanges, but Roderick is bitter that old men telling stories arent paid a wage by their listeners.

    • @liveoak227
      @liveoak227 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Enjoyer5222 the currency roderick was looking for was the simple act of listening to our elders.
      Your misunderstanding of him reinforces his point.

  • @kseniahoroshenkova2614
    @kseniahoroshenkova2614 4 ปีที่แล้ว +83

    "Don't work for 8 years.. and if really bad things happen to you, you are in the working class" - in 2020 that process takes 8 days when the economy shuts down and millions are out with nothing...

    • @Souljahna
      @Souljahna 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Exactly my thoughts. In fact I played that section twice because I was thinking he must have said 'a' year, not '8' years. This is
      how bad the economy has fared for working people in the good ole USA today.

    • @mksybr
      @mksybr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What working class can forgo work for 8 years?

    • @SP990
      @SP990 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@mksybr 1995 middle class Americans apparently

    • @mksybr
      @mksybr 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SP990 Middle class is semi propertied class, the working class the one that MUST work for its income-- exactly my point, if you are living off capital earnings or property or ownership of a business you arent working class.

    • @SP990
      @SP990 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mksybr Fair enough

  • @Israel2.3.2
    @Israel2.3.2 5 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    "It neither has nor deserves a very long existence."

    • @peterhooper2643
      @peterhooper2643 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      He's so right, this society is pathological and I can feel it soaking into me

    • @granitesevan6243
      @granitesevan6243 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@peterhooper2643Yet even watching this lecture and thinking about these things is an act of resistance. Keep going...

    • @peterhooper2643
      @peterhooper2643 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @ Thanks for commenting, it brought me back to this video and I'm going to watch it again. You'll be happy to know I discovered a way out pathology for myself and no longer feel overwhelmed by a sense of doom

    • @granitesevan6243
      @granitesevan6243 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@peterhooper2643 I'm very glad to hear that. Personally, I think that understanding the conditions in which we live is important for psychological wellbeing. Paradoxically, perhaps, even realising that things are absurdly effed up is huge part of it. Depression feeds off uncertainty

  • @sylviavasquez9523
    @sylviavasquez9523 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My favorite TH-cam philosopher.

  • @johnmiller7453
    @johnmiller7453 6 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Rick was a beacon of philosophical logic and good will. I've found no one to replace him. If you know of anyone please share.
    Good luck to us all. We certainly need some luck along with our limited amounts of skill. Be well friends and if things aren't well in your world don't go off blaming yourself. This world is designed to enslave.

    • @donaldjc1596
      @donaldjc1596 ปีที่แล้ว

      You’ve got my attention, friend. Well spoken. 👍

    • @senior.danzig
      @senior.danzig ปีที่แล้ว

      Lectures on Lacan is pretty cool

  • @empiricalmiracle8592
    @empiricalmiracle8592 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    A powerful lecture. I think the fact that he speaks with a 'non-intellectual' accent really drives home the message. We need more Rick Rodericks.

  • @lapollod8497
    @lapollod8497 8 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Cheaply and totally incorrectly found myself profile the man on account of his accent. Fanfeckintastic lecture.

  • @ttacking_you
    @ttacking_you 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Sugrue's & Staloff's lectures are more evergreen because they preclude dated pop culture references but this guy is a worthy contemporary

  • @BelatedCommiseration
    @BelatedCommiseration 10 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    This lecture seemed more about Marx than Hegel! Whilst I know Marx is probably the best known student of Hegel, the title does seem a bit misleading. He also didn't mention the dialectic of history, or the master slave dialectic, although I suppose its sort of implied when he talks about the haves and have not's. Interesting stuff though, but I often find it interesting that there is a gulf between what we value personally and what society motivates us to accept. I feel Marx hit the nail on the head when he talked about the alienation of labour and social alienation in modern society. I think that was probably the most accurate observation he ever made.

    • @naimulhaq9626
      @naimulhaq9626 10 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Hegel and Marx is about evolution and about what we are evolving into. The problem being that the program that drives evolution (environment, genome and the brain as the central processing unit) is not in our control, and we do not even have a model either.
      This program exists independent of whether we like it,or whether we have a proper understanding.
      Hegel' appeal involves the courage displayed in claiming dialectics as the universal program.
      With the big bang, dark matter and dark energy were produced with opposite properties, followed by production of particles and anti-particles, resulting in production of elements, molecules, compounds, organic compounds, amino acids etc., and on to life and intelligence.-!!!

    • @syourke3
      @syourke3 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Marx was never a student of Hegel. Hegel dies several years before Marx went to university. Hegel was still the leading philosopher in German universities and his thought certainly influenced Marx.

    • @continuousminer
      @continuousminer 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      jay very silly thing to say.

    • @emmanueloluga9770
      @emmanueloluga9770 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@continuousminer He is right though, to adopt the pragmatic blunt style of Rick Roderick..In quite simple terms, HE DIDNT READ HEGEL OR AT LEAST FAILED TO PRESENT HIM IN THIS SEGMENT. This is all Marx and the toilet should reflect so

    • @lronSky
      @lronSky 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@emmanueloluga9770 Failed to read Hegel? Thats a massive leap in logic because he didn't cover him as you'd like.

  • @TJmK1
    @TJmK1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I am envious of those student who were so lucky to attend his lectures

  • @darrellee8194
    @darrellee8194 ปีที่แล้ว

    This lecture is the beating heart of the series. Such a powerful and prescient critique of our way of life.

  • @tonikaila5512
    @tonikaila5512 11 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    One of the very finest from Roderick - many powerful points and transformative insights inspiring further investigations. Thank you so much for posting!

  • @jali4000
    @jali4000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    "Marx's name of course is not used much anymore" ha this almost dates it more than the tape artifacts, great lecture

  • @Deantrey
    @Deantrey 11 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    That ending though.. dam. Time to go rethink my life.

  • @williammaxwell2239
    @williammaxwell2239 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What an inspirering human being. Thank you Rick Roderick.

  • @dillagentlychillin
    @dillagentlychillin 11 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    stuff gets real at 28:11

  • @SwordShape
    @SwordShape 11 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    And his words are still ringing true... and that existence that doesnt deserve itself seems to be ever in danger of ending.

  • @Octochinchilly
    @Octochinchilly 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Look how timeless this is.

  • @BowofRama10
    @BowofRama10 11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wow! Amazing! That was one of the best lectures I ever heard.

  • @nightoftheworld
    @nightoftheworld 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    31:12 *Hegelian praxis* “You notice how after Hegel we’ve started giving a theory of the present and stuff-well see that was what we promised we would do. Is that philosophy at its best should be _our time_ comprehended in thought. That keeps it from being what Nietzsche says sort of _a museum of ideas which is built for loafers in the garden of knowledge._ Well for philosophy to be more than that sort of museum of ideas built for loafers in the garden of knowledge, it needs to give an intransigent account of conditions in the present. Now it could be wrong, ok I told you I was a fallibilist, what I’m saying there could be wrong. But that shouldn’t be decided by slogans or TV commercials or by Willie Horton ads but by debate, by argument among a public body-public citizens talking and arguing.”

  • @mythnow
    @mythnow 10 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I NEED A VCR!

  • @thereisonlythecave
    @thereisonlythecave 10 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Great lecture! It's truer today than in 1990. I love Rick Roderick!

  • @Matchbox20Official
    @Matchbox20Official 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Absolutely fascinating talk, thank you for posting

  • @Buttmannopfer19
    @Buttmannopfer19 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    "It is no argument to say our tribe is a little better than the other so that's fine" - Beautiful

  • @Paljk299
    @Paljk299 11 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great lecture, very impressed with this professor.

  • @jonhellstrom1411
    @jonhellstrom1411 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for this post. This man was s great teacher.

  • @nicolaasleach
    @nicolaasleach 11 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The way the video ends. We live in a pathological society, that was fucking epic!

  • @7kurisu
    @7kurisu 12 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    despite being a bit thin on hegel, rick you were right on the money with this lecture.
    there are limited theaters were human experience is prized, and these are not on the 6oclock news

  • @sedeslav
    @sedeslav 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Rick Roderick was an intellectual mountain!

  • @bwg1677
    @bwg1677 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I REALLY NEED a hiss-less audio recording of this lecture!!

  • @dark14cs
    @dark14cs 12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for these videos. Im still watching the first but I love Hegel and will watch this next.

  • @michaelknight4041
    @michaelknight4041 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Rick at his most based and most pissed. Its hard to believe that this was recorded so long ago, he even references Trump.

  • @forocultural81
    @forocultural81 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    This man is very uplifting. Sad he is gone.

    • @nightoftheworld
      @nightoftheworld 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Foro Cultural 81 will be the same with Zizek

  • @davidlogan8905
    @davidlogan8905 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Fascinating lecture.

  • @MangledMarionettes
    @MangledMarionettes 9 ปีที่แล้ว +105

    Look at all the neutrinos zipping across the screen from deep space.

    • @BunstanMcFunkstan
      @BunstanMcFunkstan 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      +Mangled Marionettes namaste loved your comment, made me giggle, thankyou :D

    • @benjaminhennessy8050
      @benjaminhennessy8050 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol I was just thinking that.

    • @boris3866
      @boris3866 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mangled Marionettes you're funny

    • @timhorton2486
      @timhorton2486 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mangled Marionettes hahaha if only...

    • @Bluudclaat
      @Bluudclaat 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      😂☀️

  • @craigtunnicliffe9095
    @craigtunnicliffe9095 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    mic drop at the end! well done RR

  • @blackmetalbanana
    @blackmetalbanana 10 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    If I weren't diogenes I would also want to be diogenes

  • @juliussw9153
    @juliussw9153 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    how come he didn't say what diogenes responded to alexander: "if i wasn't diogenes i woulf want to be diogenes too"
    that's what makes the story iconic

  • @spookybuk
    @spookybuk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great lecture.

  • @nightoftheworld
    @nightoftheworld 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    37:29 *Necessary human requirements* “What I’ve been trying to fill out today for you is a richer notion of freedom in which we recognize that before moral problems really come up in the philosophical sense... before they really come up there are conditions for human life that have to be fulfilled which I call _necessary human requirements._ They’re not sufficient to live a good life, but they’re necessary. Among them are: food, shelter, ordinary healthcare-real exciting huh? See that’s not as much fun as Kant but they’re real important because without that it’s hard to follow the _categorical imperative._ You know.. it’s easier to follow a ham sandwich without that. So that’s a necessary but not a sufficient condition for a good life.”

  • @NoahsUniverse
    @NoahsUniverse 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    beautiful lecture !! rick roderick was truly intelligent!

  • @granitesevan6243
    @granitesevan6243 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The end hit like a hammer...

  • @jamiecochran3286
    @jamiecochran3286 8 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I wonder what Roderick would say if he knew Trump was running the country today.

    • @kingofurukgilgamesh7828
      @kingofurukgilgamesh7828 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Watch his lecture on Baudrillard in the "Self under siege" series. Much of what he says about Reagan can be applied to Trump.

    • @Maziedivision
      @Maziedivision 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He'd whip up some of Jameson's postmodern theory in the Logic of Late Capital about revivalism and the "continuous present ", definitely lots of Baudrillard's hyperreality, and obviously a critique of how neoliberalism and the 08 stock market crash allowed Trump to be seductive in the first place.

  • @brandonmiles8174
    @brandonmiles8174 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Imagine still having to, or even having the privilege to quit working for 8 years before things get real bad. We're at a point here where if you quit working for 8 days, 8 weeks for the lucky, your life is upside down.

  • @arsenelupin123
    @arsenelupin123 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    "No one spells quite clearly [that we think the poor deserve their condition]"
    This makes me almost glad he left us so early. If had seen what we're capable of...

  • @Tezman82
    @Tezman82 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the post.

  • @jasonshajan929
    @jasonshajan929 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "If I were not Alexander, then I should wish to be Diogenes."
    But what Diogenes would say is, "If I were not Diogenes, I would still wish to be Diogenes"

  • @BSGofficial001
    @BSGofficial001 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Talking about the lack of respect for unwaged roles in life makes me think of the different reactions people have when gifted something bought Vs something made by the gifter. More often than not in my experience giving people a present like a drawing generates far less joy than if I bought them something, because the thing that's bought seems more genuine and desirable. Buy someone a book and they will see it as legitimate; write a book, bind it yourself and gift it and it falls flat lol

  • @christopherepperson3583
    @christopherepperson3583 8 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    Hot damn, Rick Roderick just demolished Donald Trump years before he ever ran for president. Superb lecture.

    • @S2Cents
      @S2Cents 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I hope Trump wins.

    • @TheCrankydragon
      @TheCrankydragon 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      me too

    • @freezybiscuit
      @freezybiscuit 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      LOL

    • @MacSmithVideo
      @MacSmithVideo 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      lol

    • @NoahsUniverse
      @NoahsUniverse 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @CountFenrir It is sick what is happening in America--and for that matter... all around the world. People's conceptions of a meaningful involvement is absolutely deprived of a lasting meaning, aside from an abjectly hedonistic rejection of humanism.

  • @LethalBubbles
    @LethalBubbles 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    that final quote hits hard.

  • @Paseosinperro
    @Paseosinperro 11 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Does anyone know any other lectures or videos of this kind and quality? I am hungry for more and I have watched Roderick's videos many times

    • @ResearchReveals
      @ResearchReveals 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Open TH-cam; Search Sartre or Kant or Socrates, etc; explore some of the videos. I like Wes Cecil's series on the lives and philosophies of various people. The series from A Partially Examined Life offers indepth discussions of particular works of philosophers.

    • @Paseosinperro
      @Paseosinperro 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hey thanks, I'll check this Wes
      Cecil

    • @Paseosinperro
      @Paseosinperro 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ResearchReveals Hey I have listening to Wes Cecil's videos and they are wonderful. Thanks!!

    • @chrisc7265
      @chrisc7265 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      if you're after philosophy, Gregory B Sadler's channel is the best I've found on YT
      he's quite a bit less political, though

  • @3rd_POV
    @3rd_POV 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow some strong themes there

  • @vidividivicious
    @vidividivicious 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Magnificent

  • @kaimarmalade9660
    @kaimarmalade9660 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pilgrim from the Sugrueverse here! Cheers ya'll.

  • @chadcrabtree6455
    @chadcrabtree6455 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    The really hard cuts in these lectures make me wish we had access to the unedited tapes.

    • @AndreasDivus1
      @AndreasDivus1 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      In the uncut ones Roderick tells bar jokes and anecdotes that are totally inappropriate and quite ribald honestly.

    • @davidd854
      @davidd854 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AndreasDivus1 Now I really want to see it

  • @brendanhutsell208
    @brendanhutsell208 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This dude rocks

  • @davidfost5777
    @davidfost5777 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm always looking for new interesting lectures on Psychology/Philosophy, please let me know if you guys have any recommendations, would be highly appreciated

  • @stndsure7275
    @stndsure7275 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It isn't the financiers that are the axis of evil - it is the advertising industry - they created all the "new needs"...

    • @nightoftheworld
      @nightoftheworld 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oners82 and they’d both argue that people _freely_ choose to buy these things, that they decided themselves to _need_ VCRs, Nikes and Infinity cars (while actively denying any responsibility in massaging those desires of course..)

    • @ttacking_you
      @ttacking_you ปีที่แล้ว

      Let's reduce it further and give "attention" all the culpability

  • @nfn58
    @nfn58 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good lecture.

  • @nightoftheworld
    @nightoftheworld 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    25:30 *no book is 100% right* “I don’t care if it’s _right_ [...] because what we want from books is to get something out of them that we can use.”

  • @drprofessor1414
    @drprofessor1414 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did anyone catch what he said @ 2:00?? And see what we facing rn… damn this is on point p

  • @8301TheJMan
    @8301TheJMan 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    "It neither has nor deserves a long existence", so fuckin true

  • @almostengineering1929
    @almostengineering1929 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    10:00 Replace the word rubble with riot

  • @willowbell3756
    @willowbell3756 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now that capital is concentrated into so few hands people are expendable, thus the possibility of robotisation in the coming decade.
    I'm sure Rick would be astounded by the developments of the last 20 years.

  • @RinatNugayev
    @RinatNugayev 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There seems to be a strong correlation between the amount of Rick's Western Texas accent and the amount of US social problems. Maybe quite unconsciously he had tried to obfuscate the social problems to foreigners ?

  • @achillespapakon
    @achillespapakon 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @Stella Maris
    Well, it's not so easy to separate Hegel's followers to admirers and detractors. For exemple, Feuerbach and young Marx were pretty much criticising Hegel and his idealism. But for them too, his was the absolute reference, the philosopher who you had absolutely positively the obligation to face. I think as far as political thinkers of 20th century goes, Marcuse and Adorno are the best "readers" of Hegel I've ever read, and you forgot to mention them. ;)

    • @nightoftheworld
      @nightoftheworld 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      What about Zizek’s Hegelian reading?

  • @maneatingseas
    @maneatingseas 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sharpest guy on this shitshow of philology

  • @abcrane
    @abcrane 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very refreshing...the calmness of the lecture and lecture hall...in comparison with today where the hall would be filled with people texting and fidgeting...indicative of how much worse things have gotten with regards to "Veblen Goodism" and how conspicuous has become the "work" as well (internet get rich scams and "spectator economy" (likes, shares and ads on the cooky cat vids).

  • @abcrane
    @abcrane 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    31:30 that guy really enjoyed the Nietzsche reference:)

  • @dm6801
    @dm6801 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    19:18 onward is a great point

  • @derwandschauer
    @derwandschauer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Now we finally know what Luke Skywalker studied on that island. 🤔😉

  • @SkyofChange
    @SkyofChange 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    oh dear, that was good.

  • @canceresbunny
    @canceresbunny ปีที่แล้ว

    That VCR line goes harder than acknoledged. 😅

  • @joenobody8997
    @joenobody8997 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Love it in 2019. Time to study Marx carefully without the bias that have been brainwashed into us.

  • @pokokor6121
    @pokokor6121 ปีที่แล้ว

    19:14 20:12 27:47 29:12 38:57

  •  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    He named the lesson 'Hegel' but spoke about Marx instead because he wanted to sneak Marx in without turning people off from buying the product.

    • @emmanueloluga9770
      @emmanueloluga9770 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Classic tactic. Despite the fact, this was still a great lecture

  • @-33312
    @-33312 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Was the video cut at the 34 minute mark?

  • @iMissMyHomies
    @iMissMyHomies 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you imagine how Roderick would react if we could tell him that in 2008 the USA elected a black president who served two consecutive terms. And then in 2016 we elected Donald Trump?

  • @emmanueloluga9770
    @emmanueloluga9770 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    TITLE IS MISLEADING. While this was an astute and succinct commentary that serves more as a practical joke especially the end segment, this was about Marx, not Hegel. Oh wait..isn't Marx about Hegel?.......badadumsssttt

  • @PaulSouthernCross
    @PaulSouthernCross 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    He gave a great talk on how to mood-alter through self-righteousness, though he thought he was doing something else.
    For a talk that was very polemical, highly selective and incomplete, he could have shown more humility. But humility is not a strong point of the sanctimonious.

  • @calebgrasse
    @calebgrasse 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    @5:56 damn my boy Rick going HAM lol

  • @griggins6205
    @griggins6205 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great lecture, but Rick was wrong about the actually existing Comminist states. He forgot that they were also in a state of dialectical flux, a new Being in the state of Becoming.

  • @xalian17
    @xalian17 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wait is this Marx or Hagel lecture.....?

  • @nightoftheworld
    @nightoftheworld 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    23:19 *Texomarxist theory of Ideology* “If you wanna know how someone thinks, look at how they dress, who they hang out with, where they live-right-the kinds of folks they went to school with, sorta how big is their bank account, and you’ll pretty much know where they’re coming from. Which is the banal west Texas way of stating _Marxist theory of ideology._ And it’s right-it’s true, you pretty much do. And it’s not a rigid theory, it’s not like you’re never surprised, but you’re rarely surprised. It’s the best rough generalization about social [class] relations that I know of.“

  • @CobaltSthenia
    @CobaltSthenia 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    When he talks about hissless music, he becomes George Carlin.

  • @3576alan
    @3576alan 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    40:15 I'm curious what Roderick thinks about Trump being president.

    • @elrodtherocker
      @elrodtherocker 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thankfully, he is dead.

    • @3576alan
      @3576alan 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@elrodtherocker 😳 Wow! You obviously wouldn't know this; we buried my stepmother today.
      I also found out that several people on my father's side passed away; From an aunt to an uncle and my grandfather.
      Not to mention both stepmothers.
      So, your comment is just so f

  • @nightoftheworld
    @nightoftheworld 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mic drop ending

  • @MatthewBorn88
    @MatthewBorn88 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    In another miniseries so it seems.

  • @quagapp
    @quagapp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great, Rick Roderick was great (and is here in these lectures) -- but re ball bearings -- machines cannot operate on frictionless systems. I think that the creation of needs is not always designed. Solar power and now less polluting systems conflict with Capitalism's (automatic need) to "expand or die". (From the 'singularity' we have a process. Scarier, we have a chain of causation. So we have to assume free will.) But another aspect is the alienation of man from labour (in being in factory work etc as against, say farm work or 'cottage industries'), displaced from what Heidegger calls 'Techne' where the making of a shoe can be known and understood by most people, and larger and larger of groups of people. In something very strange -- nations.

  • @Callamatteomatisch
    @Callamatteomatisch 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Feel a little clickbaited and decieved into listening to a lecture on Marx (when I was curious about Hegel). Was interesting enough though.

    • @singleoneonly
      @singleoneonly 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      To be fair, marx is the most famous hegelian and basically the way everyone finds out about hegel today. But if you want a better hegel centric lecture I recommend the ones by Arthur f Holmes from wheaton College.

  • @willowbell3756
    @willowbell3756 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I don't believe that Russia has eradicated its history. I was there last year and stayed in hostels, where I saw young, men in particular, watching old black and white films of the revolution etc.
    I doubt that Stalin is as unpopular among all Russians, as the west imagines.
    People are far too hard on Joe Stalin, I say this as a South Wales Valley person, who feels grateful to his attempts to maintain the communist momentum, of course communism could not have become a reality, but he tried.
    The Hitler war shook Russia to the core, and destabilised, both the country, and what remained of the communist momentum, which was probably the western intention. It is interesting that Hitler entered Russia, but left Britain alone by and large.

    • @davidd854
      @davidd854 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes it was all a capitalist conspiracy

  • @levinb1
    @levinb1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    40:10 Donald Trump reference to wages