What the HOPE Accord Means for You with Dr. Joseph Fraiman
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ค. 2024
- In this video, we dive into the HOPE Accord, a significant movement led by over 1,000 doctors and scientists advocating for the suspension of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. The Accord calls for a thorough reevaluation of the vaccine’s safety and efficacy amid growing concerns about lockdowns, school closures, and vaccine mandates.
We explore key issues such as the potential harms of the vaccine, the importance of informed consent, and the need for randomized controlled trials to provide more reliable data. Additionally, we discuss the controversial topics of publication bias, the suppression of dissenting studies, and the need for a more ethical and responsible regulatory body. Join us as we unravel the complexities of this critical conversation and consider the future of vaccine policy and medical ethics
Receive Exclusive Episodes & Q&A Content by joining our Substack Community: www.illusionconsensus.com/
Sponsors
- Alcami Elements :www.alcamielements.com/
Receive 10% OFF first order or 30% OFF subscription order using code: ILLUSION
-Brownstone institute: brownstone.org/
Timestamps
0:20 Introduction to Dr Joe Fraiman
2:38 Calling for the suspension of the COVID-19 vaccine
10:25 Weighing the risks and benefits
12:20 Is there a group that benefits from the vaccine?
15:55 We can no longer trust regulatory bodies
17:30 The cautionary tale of Thalidomide
26:56 Acting on blind belief
34:23 Vaccine manufacturers are not liable for injuries
37:00 Government propaganda & gaslighting the injured
43:10 Coercion in education and immigration
53:10 Randomized trials, bias & accurate data
58:15 Drug companies vs the hit-list of critics
01:03:42 The need to return to ethical regulation - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Thank you very much Dr. Fraiman. I have had a Covid vaccine injury for over 3 years and it is a nightmare.
Saying the mRNA's could've, might've, possible, maybe could have helped some, a few, a cohort of, is not a reason to keep these shots on the market. AND believing that pharma (one of the most compromised industries in terms of regulation) somehow would now be transparent and do appropriate trials to prove mRNA technology is safe and effective is a joke. These lying creeps belong in jail. Pull the mRNAs until the industry and regulators are restructured and have accountability and liability.
Strongly agree with you!!!
How do they know the mRNA shots help? The effects waned fast. Ivermectin was forbidden and Dr. Kory had great results, it seems like a no-brainer which truly was the safe and effective intervention.
100%
It is unethical to FORCE spike disease upon unwilling people.
PULL IT FROM THE MARKET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Advertising it every day on the radio, for everyone including pregnant women.
Ask yourself. When was there another time in history where a group of people were othered and had civil rights removed?
Horrific times, all.
Yeah many times. Nazi Germany "othered" the Jews, Gypsies, other groups. In Africa Rwanda 2 groups took turns "othering" each other. U.S. "othered" the Japanese and locked them up in camps. They lost their houses. The Japanese "other" their minority groups. The Chinese have Huigers that they "other." Black people were "othered" and mistreated horribly when compelled to perform farm work as slaves. Prisoners arrested for smoking marijuana are "othered" when they are black or Hispanic. When asked to free these prisoners Kamala Harris refused because she wanted to keep using them for low cost fire fighting in California. The poor are "othered" and felt to feel shame. The Indians "othered" the "untouchable" class. "Othering" is a powerful form of social control and maintaining power.
Why didn’t you include a link to the Hope Accord in the show notes?
A tried to publish it in a comment without success. It could be google censoring it.
I am one of those "less than those" who will sign this accord
How do I sign this accord?
Just follow the instructions that say "Click here to sign."
Signed the accord two days ago.
An early GBDeclaration-signer
i signed the GBD 10/21 if I remember well. Hoped to find a link to HOPE here.
Thanks for keeping this conversation alive. And thanks for the opportunity to participate in this via the hope accord🙏
Shedding is the reason, Jay.
The vaccinated SHOULD HAVE BEEN FORCED TO QUARANTINE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To protect against shedding to the unvaxxed?
Complete support for Dr Fraiman !
I have never understood why mucosal vaccines were not explored ab initio in this pandemic. We know from polio that they have the potential to protect from disease AND reduce transmission.
A big THANK YOU from Ontario, Canada❣
Given that mRNA vaccines serve as their own adjuvant .. how can the control group be getting saline?
Thank you for this great thoughtful conversation about the pros and cons. Co-ersion is definitely a problem. I am over 70 but decided after the 3rd update that this is silly. I will not take it until the risk is outweighed by the benefits for me. I want the choice! I have also trusted the agencies but now I don't. I have a question: didn't something change with the "Obamacare" law that allowed the pharmaceutical companies to advertise and also (indirectly?) change how the immunizations are set up? I believe that there have been changes that incentivize pushing drugs or vaccines, is that true and are there details to consider? Why has this change taken place?
Where to I go to sign,?
Sorry if I’m wrong, but I tried to publish the link to the accord two times and the app throws errors at me.
But this comment got through. Guess google doesn’t like the link. Can anyone else try?
However, a search at DuckDuckGo for the hope accord did help.
if the MRNA platform gets rolled out as they plan what % of the world's productive workforce could end up either dying, being seriously injured and so unable to work, or having to come out of the workforce to support the injured? I have read reports that it could be as high as 20% within 10 years. That would destroy the global economy (more than the state its already in) which could be disastrous.
The safety review period for vaccines in clinical trials is a mere 24-48 hours. All vaccines should be suspended until proper safety studies are completed. Jay, if you don’t believe this - please watch the deposition of Stanley Plotkins conducted by Aaron Siri - time stamp 12:38:48.
I believe europe has disallowed vax for those under 65 for a few years now... so it's not a crazy concept to ban it entirely (or at least recommend against it)
If you watch this guy's interview with John Campbell, he does a lot to cover his own you-know-what and defend the pharmaceutical industry.
John Campbell is a Johnny-Come-Lately.
@@gerrymcguire2863 Correct, but he arrived a lot sooner than Fraimam, and Jay's still miles behind.
@@gerrymcguire2863 no he is not he was around & one of the only people I listened to that was pro covid actions but I had already made up my mind that most of it was BS but I liked the way he took time to try to explain it all ...he then had his eyes opened & has made it his mission these last 3 years to expose the unscientific nonsense & the evil behind it all
We need to get mean.
Isn't this Jay based at Stanford university? And didn't Stanford run the children's Pfizer trial?
The problem is, Jay, with the government we have, I can't imagine a responsible agency.
On immigrants, how many illegal aliens need to present evidence of vaccination, as in any vaccination whatsoever? But legal immigrants are, what, second class immigrants?
I signed as a concerned citizen. Bullshit Bhattacharya has not, to date, figured out what is True concerning these covid times.
He's a pressure valve. Limited hangout. Conteolled opposition. Point to the smaller crimes committed during the pandemic (lockdowns, mandates, etc.) and scream bloody murder about them to cover for the much bigger crime, and we all know what that is.
@@abe1996 well said
Isn't he based at Stanford Uni and didn't they do the Pfizer children's trial? (Jay).
He is based at Stanford Uni. Stanford ran the children's Pfizer trial I believe.
I love Jay - but he makes some of the weakest arguments in this discussion that I've ever heard him make. Jay always strikes me as cautious which I think is generally a good trait, however in this case it seems overdone since he must be aware that Joe has also proven himself a cautious individual. I'll be signing and encouraging others to do so!
Yes his arguments are weak in this instance. But that’s maybe because he to a large degree agrees with Fraiman. In order to make his guest use his best arguments, he tries to shoot it down in the meantime. It’s not the usual way to do interviews, but it’s definitely interesting.
Jay is based at Stanford Uni. Stanford ran the children's Pfizer vaccine trial I believe. You can see from his stuttering he is uncomfortable.
Jay is a highly principled and honest person. He is usually clear minded but in this case, by allowing it to continue it will do more harm than good. Whereas by discontinuing it, even if he is right that some will possibly benefit, that number is very small compared to those it will hurt (young people). I think Joe successfully debunks this with the above argument... hopefully Jay will come to his senses on this
This Jay is uncomfortable. A lot of stuttering.