Supreme Court 8-1 Decision Impacting Emergency Orders To End All "Assault Weapon" Bans Nationwide!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 มิ.ย. 2024
- In this video I break down important developments in the Supreme Court rifle and mag ban cases!
🎥 Follow Me On Other Social Media 🎥
Instagram: / armedscholaryt
Twitter: / armedscholaryt
Twitch: / armedscholar
📷 My TH-cam Setup 📷
Camera: (Sony A7siii) amzn.to/36YIe96
Lens: (Tamron 17-28) amzn.to/3wSPn5H
Lighting: (GVM RGB) amzn.to/3zpDfdT
Microphone: (Rode Wireless) amzn.to/3iBgnkU
Camera Stand: (Broadcast Boom) amzn.to/2V7meWV
Legal Disclaimer: This content is not intended to provide any legal guidance or advice. Although I am a licensed attorney I am not providing any legal advice through this video. If you have any legal questions please contact a licensed professional in your area to address your specific issues.
DISCLAIMER: This video and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. This helps support my channel and allows us to continue making awesome videos like this. Thank you for the support!
Support the channel by liking the video and subscribing!
Don’t forget to share the video too.
when are you going to get it right -- GOA does NOT have a separate lawsuit. GOA is one of the plaintiffs in the FFL lawsuit
FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENSEES OF ILLINOIS, an
Illinois not-for-profit corporation, GUNS SAVE LIFE, an Illinois not-for-profit corporation, GUN
OWNERS OF AMERICA, a California non-stock corporation and
a not-for-profit membership organization, GUN OWNERS FOUNDATION, a Virginia non-stock corporation
and a not-for-profit legal defense and educational foundation, PIASA ARMORY, a Missouri
corporation, DEBRA CLARK, a resident of Cumberland County, Illinois, JASMINE YOUNG, a resident of
Madison County, Illinois, and CHRIS MOORE, a resident of Hardin County, Illinois,
I'm still waiting for someone to realize that the entire Bill of Rights is being violated by these gun control laws, not just the 2A.
oh, many of us well know. just can't get any stupid lawyers to file a case citing those other rights violations.
Lol boomer
One must argue that the Bill of Rights is nothing more than a document restricting the government's ability to regulate your God given rights.
@@ParisLawLess
@@SoloRenegade
That's the problem with lawyers. They're too hidebound with their traditions to see what's right in front of them.
Screw that Illinois governor
He should ban his own assault burgers. It will cause heart issues.
Because he's fat
Maybe we get LUCKY he DOES A HARALD WASHINGTON THEN HE CAN JOIN HIM IN HELL
And the California one too
Don't forget Inslime in WA state!
You know apparently the SUPREME COURT DECISION'S DON'T MEAN ANYTHING WHEN THE INDIVIDUAL STATES CAN JUST IGNORE THE DECISION AND MAKE THEIR OWN DECISIONS AND LAWS.
I know for one Texas isn't following this garbage.
You forget that;
when a State is putting out the hand to enjoy federal funding, there is an application process and the contractually binding contract to hold into account the terms and conditions and penalties.
Yeah really.
The law that applies to situations where state and federal laws disagree is called the supremacy clause, which is part of article VI of the Constitution. The supremacy cause contains what's known as the doctrine of pre-emption, which says that the federal government wins in the case of conflicting legislation.
So glad i dont live in a liberal gun hating state
We the people need to stop waiting for the government to save us we must save ourselves
It's the only way
Right keyboard warrior 😂
Violent uprising is what they want. It will give them justification to go full commie and most of the population will go along with it. Gotta educate the population and turn them against the oligarchy.
@@MustPassTruck
We're well past that bub.
@@Ineedanewdong Far from it sucka
What we have learned from the last ruling is that we only have one justice upholding the constitution.
I think SCOTUS took Rahimi (sp) as a way to play politics. It was a stupid case from the beginning and allowed SCOTUS to regain favor with the people and politicians to show they will to their bidding. The only one who doesn't think that way is our guy Justice Thomas. He just calls it like it is regardless of what people think of him. A true American Hero.
Agree!
Agree. I don’t agree trying to get this rahimi thug and 2A rights. He assaulted his girlfriend and shot someone. I don’t give a crap if he has not been “convicted”, he’s a bad guy and should never have a firearm in my opinion. I don’t know why all the 2A folks think this decision is terrible.
Forget this rahimi guy quit spending money on him. and go after real anti 2A rulings.
People aren't really paying attention to the one part in Rahimi that really matters: The fact that SCOTUS vote the way it did because it openly stated ".. been adjudicated".. ie.. went to court. Not a bench order. Not a random decision. But an actual court case. It's going to slaughter "red flag" laws in short order. I'm just wondering why these TH-camrs haven't caught onto that other than VivaFrei.
I think the biggest point is the statement in Cargill by Sotomayor that AR15s are in common use. That kind of blows a hole in Illinois argument.
You'd think, but remember, politics, especially in the last 8 years, is about emotion, not logical consistency.
By that metric an AR 15 with a Hostess Twinkie attached to it is not in common use, so it must be illegal.
@@greg_austin which is exactly the point imo. open the door. after all, you can't have full communism with an armed populace.
@@MrKago1 Judiciary is supposed to be apolitical. Clearly it is not. Judiciary proves as corrupt as the legislative and executive branches and its DOJ, or a communist dictatorship, a hereditary monarchy ...all forms of government. Judiciary just makes up these rules as they go along .... e.g. "text, history and tradition of the legal practices in 1791 is the true metric." Uh. okay ...based on what, exactly? Thin air?
Abolish the ATF
The right to bear arms shall not be infringed! (Unless your ex gives herself a bruise and gets a restraining order against you)
... and gets to steal your house, your kid, your money, and everything you have ever loved.
Happens a lot actually. Look at Colorado you lose all your rights for nonviolent domestic violence charge enhancements. I've seen people lose 2A rights over yelling in public. Look it up.
Or if you try to shoot at witnesses that saw you assault your girlfriend. Rahimi should be thrown in jail.
@@Paiadakine Instead of being thrown in jail, "Restraining Orders" dump the government's responsibility of placing criminals who should have been under custody onto the detainee himself, and onto the public at large. By decree, the restrained party is suddenly faced with homelessness, a cruel and unusual punishment.
Therefore, detainees are suddenly faced with the situation that they must BEG to be housed in prison--at least with three hots and a cot--which is a big step up from his homelessness that has been decreed in exchange for not abiding by the wife's whining orders for oral sex, when she refuses to shower or shave, or for his inability to supply her with more money to waste vacationing.
We need clemency reform for non violent felons please. They allow 2a for illlegals that could have escaped prison but I cannot protect my family over a 20+ year old non violent charge that’s now one of the countries biggest income
Free men don't ask permission.
They had to leave enough wiggle room for the grabbers to keep up their shenanigans.
Fence sitters eventually get it in the end;)
You misspelled Grabblers..
@@mikeborrelli193 Gobblers. As in gobblin' weiners...
@@mikeborrelli193 ain't no L in grabber.
@@robertkoonce8365
Right. Which is why he said *_grabblers._*
Justice Thomas is correct.
Regardless, he's also bought and paid for. He's financially compromised. Even if we agree with decisions he makes, we must acknowledge that he lacks ethics.
Thomas is a low witted lazy judge. Apparently, he forgot all the laws he quoted in the Bruen decision having to do with the history and tradition.
Thanks for the update. I wish the SCOTUS would just come out and spank these lower courts for clearly going against the precedent set in Bruen. It's maddening.
My thoughts too, why hear any of the arguments that are either a clear waste of time or clearly TRYING to waste time ✌️
Agree just tell theses petty tyrants go f themselves and anything they want to do is unconstitutional and citizens can sue them personnelly
So basically, we’re gonna keep going up and down the course system they’re never going to relinquish anything
do oligarchs ever (willingly) return power to the People?
It’s difficult to believe that the same court that gave us Bruen just dropped the ball with Rahimi.
This channel takes 5 minutes to get to a 30 second point...good God man
He really does, the intro takes forever and is repetitive then repeats the same
Information from prior videos then gets to the point, and then relates the same thing at the end. I skim them for the important bits and move on.
He really does, the intro takes forever and is repetitive then repeats the same
Information from prior videos then gets to the point, and then repeats the same thing at the end. I skim them for the important bits and move on.
He's gotta earn his bread too, playtime is his paycheck.
The U.S. Supreme Court needs to get off their butts and actually do some work and put an end to all these Outstanding cases. My 87 year old Grandmother who's been dead for ten years does more work than the U.S Supreme Court.
Sooo…. Any of these gun groups going to help out CA and the 11% tax on gun and ammo purchases? It takes effect July 1st this year.
Move out of California
Probably not. Thats why I bought what I wanted before july 1. Not paying these tyrants.
They can't until July 1st.
You have to actually pay the 11% to establish the grounds to challenge it first. It's how you obtain legal standing to bring the case.
Thank you , I'm so glad you're able to keep up with all these cases.
I want to believe that good things are coming… SCOTUS cowardly behavior doesn’t give me much hope though….
Good things come eventually ...but when Rome fell it took over a thousand years of The Dark Ages to finally come to a Renaissance.
What you’re doing and the Information you are providing us with is highly important and extremely appreciated .. thank you
Thanks for all of your content Anthony
Thanks for watching!
If we all simply fail to comply with the laws and take up arms against unjust enforcement we wouldn't have to worry about supreme court decisions or the lower courts....
Keep it going! Everyone needs to stand and be more involved.
Thanks as always for your update.
Outstanding the update! Thank you!
Good info! Thanks
🇺🇸 thanks for the update!
Thanks for the information.
Thank you for the information.
Thanks for the update!
Great channel and information as always
As a long-time viewer, I wanted to compliment you on slowing down your speech. You have always had great info and amazing legal insight, but your slower delivery makes it much more enjoyable to watch. Thank you for all your great work for the 2A cause!
When I listen to Ben Shapiro I set playback speed to 75% 😂. It is a huge help
Thanks for the accurate and clear updates 🤙🙏
Thank you for all your hard work bringing all these cases to us.
We appreciate you Mr. Miranda!👍✌️👊
Thank you for the updates.
Thank you for your content.
Thanks for the updates
Thank you for your reporting.
Great job unpacking this decision Anthony. Thank you for keeping this understandable.
The right to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Unless you live in Illinois. Where you have to jump through 1000 hoops, pay money, get background checked, to use a right already yours.
Thank you again, as always.
I subscribed brotha! This content is priceless thank you.
Thanks!
Love your content and breakdowns my man. Keep it up!
Thanks for the good report
Thanks for the info
I just feel that I am going to stay screwed for a long time.
Thank you for all you do. Your a blessing sir.
The supreme Court is like going to a car dealership, what trim or rims that'll make me look like the norm. I'm sick of people that are not elected but selected
Careful what you wish for… if we were a direct democracy, you’d have long since lost all of your constitutional protections. The SCOTUS is currently the only branch attempting to remain somewhat close to the rule of law.
The supreme Court is currently the only reason we have a 2A at all.
Andrew Jackson gave us elected judges and prosecutors. The 17th Amendment made the US Senate a longer tenured House of Representatives, in effect and outcome. Both have hurt our country.
I'm far more sick of people who are elected.
Thank you
Thanks Anthony
Thank you for your analysis of these very important issues…
Thank you!🎉🎉🎉🎉
AND HOW CAN A PRESIDENT CAN PUT OUT A EO WITHOUT CONGRESS AGREEMENT TO THE EO AND PASSED INTO LAW ? AND NOT JUST THE OPINION OF A PRESIDENT !...
Executive irders only apply to departments within thhe executive branch. They're just memos from the boss.
Only applicable to federal employees just as stated governors only to state employees not the public.
It's like a memo, it has zero bearing on the law. It is like a policy position letter.
He's not a real president just a senile old man who lies every time he opens his mouth.
You are a wealth of knowledge!
Good job
Great video!
Excellent analysis
Thanks for all your hard work.
Great recap
Thx Anthony
Subscribed for a long time and very pleased with your channel.. Wish I could afford to support more.
Good stuff
Thanks for the update! Love the channel and just some positive feedback: 1.) Explain it to me like I’m a fifth grader. 2.) now explain it to me like a 3rd grader. I’m sure there are plenty of Illinois residents current and new gun owners who are ready to jump when these restrictions are struck down.
10,000 Views in under an hour. AMAZING 👏 🇺🇸 🌎
Don't read anything about "common use" , "tradition" , or "usual" in the 2nd amendment as written in 1791 writing of the US Constitution
When wiil they reread and apply as written into the cases (BTW it should never get out of county courts and just affirm the 2nd Amendment as written)
I am so glad.!!
Thanks
You are one of my main sources for 2A news
Thank you man can’t wait for Illinois to hopefully correct the unconstitutional PICA act
So am I.
Good job A.S solid
Thank you
God bless you
Gracias por el updates
Will watch and see what happens this week .
Good Morning from Corrupt Illinois. Thanks for the info. I'm still wondering since Justice Sotomayor mentioned something about not being able to Ban things in Common Use in her opinion.
I did not hear any stupid booms. I'm impressed. Much better. I am resubscribing.
Thank you for this 2A update.
I've been subscribed for quite a while
Excellent ❤
They say the AR - 15 isn't in common use.
They sure as hell want to wish them away.
" SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"
If the government lapdogs can have those weapons, then we as the people have the exact same right so we can defend ourselves from a tyrant in power!
For the Algorisms
Thank You Anthony 👍😎👍
SCOTUS or SCrOTUmS?
Hello Al
First place, they aren't "assault weapons". Semi auto is not fully automatic.....
2A Constitutional Carry........no Bureaucratic B.S. needed
Wrong! All guns are assault weapons. Their primary function is to assault. With that said that is the reason they call them assault weapons so they can take EVERY gun.
Mar 8, 2024 - SPOKANE - A federal judge today agreed with Attorney General Bob Ferguson ... “My legal team remains undefeated against the gun lobby in court,”
What does the decision do for states that have magazine laws that prohibit buying or selling “high capacity” magazines, but not specifically banning the possession of them? A MD resident cannot buy or sell them in MD, not buy them via mail. But they can travel out of state and bring them home.
500K+ to 700K+ in such a short time, proves how awesome your work is!
What are the correct channels that we need to be using. Organize and share.
“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States.”
-Noah Webster
Rahimi decision green lighted red flag laws. Not good!
Here is the Rahimi language you may want to consider.
“The conclusion that focused regulations like the surety laws are not a historical analogue for a broad prohibitory regime like New York’s does not mean that they cannot be an appropriate analogue for a narrow one.” Rahimi at pp. 15-16. (Don’t recall the correct citation to a slip opinion).
General prohibitions on entire classes of weapons or magazines above certain capacity would likely be unconstitutional under this test.
A bar on individuals judicial determined to be a threat to the public, after providing an opportunity to heard, from possessing certain kinds of guns or magazines about a particular capacity would likely be constitutional.
Yes
Loved that there is someone tracking and presenting these issues to us peanuts.
Hi Al
i feel Rhemi was a bad example to move that case to the supreme court.. he had a lot more against him then an unrulily wife or a false restraining order. he is legitimately a nut job and using him for a 2a poster child was a bad decision to begin with.
There are so many mixed opinions about the Rahimi case out there so I guess we will just have to wait and see and hope for the best. When it comes to the 9th Circus, I still expect bad news all around. I would be surprised if they send Duncan back to Benitez again, lol.
Could you do a section where you summarize and dumb it down? I have trouble understanding all the legal terminology.
Here to help that rythem