Can you make a video on this detailed ... Like start with a web application using APIs and if there is a requirement for a mobile app, then we can easily go since we have developed APIs For this we need to decide on which point we need to go for app development and what type of architecture we need to use, that makes it easy to move to mobile app development I want to understand that..
That's only an advantage if you have experience in webdev. If you are proficient with Java it'll be easier to write native android apps then go through some weird library to get a website (I'm neither so sorry if there's a very obvious solution)
Try using those web apps with no or limited internet and then get back to me. Mobile apps gives the user the ability to use the app offline if need be.
I mean, the information in the blog itself isn't false. The average person most likely uses less than half of all apps on their phone, on a daily basis.
You ducking say that but it’s because your ok downloading a 50mb once and waiting like 10 minutes for it to install but if the website take more then 3 seconds to load with the same functionality as that app you like nah it’s too long. Websites are constrained by this, if you would wait the same amount of time and then install a website as a pwa then you’d get the same functionality but unfortunately websites are thought of as different from an app even though they are the same
@@AcidiFy574 , the entire point of a mobile app is that you can pull out your small and easily portable phone to use it at any time. This video completely ignores while MOBILE apps were invented.
@@Shark-hn4mvThis proves that you don't know what web technologies can do because what you just described CAN be done using web technologies. You can install the app from the app store and open it from and icon
Websites are not convenient for users logically following its better to have a mobile app for companies to promote their businesses. Its better start with startup for small entrepreneurs but then its must have to have an app if they want to grow bigger and attract a huge audience
@@sqfzerzefsdf well a majority of people still use 2 to 3 year old devices which lag greatly when you apply too much css on it. If you add less styling the app would just look dull and kinda like "atleast it works". On the other hand Mobile apps are much more optimised for those hardware and you don't have to worry about responsive design. You'll be missing a lot more customers if you don't make a mobile app that's optimised enough to run on most devices.
@@anasabubakar4125 thanks for taking the time to reply. I started kotlin 3 days ago and I've been enjoying it so far, I will look into Java and c# in the future
Websites are not convenient for users logically following its better to have a mobile app for companies to promote their businesses. Its better start with startup for small entrepreneurs but then its must have to have an app if they want to grow bigger and attract a huge audience
As a user I‘m sometimes annoyed by this approach - the amazon app is really just the website and it feels that way. Native iOS Apps have a different way of navigating than a website and when I open an App, I want to have this workflow. But of course starting with a website is a great way to start and then you can add specific custom items and workflows for the different operating systems with React native e.g.
@@Vivi-xn9iz They have to do it because they want to be in touch with users. And they can't afford to create native apps or possibly don't have knowledge about native apps development.
@@gulabpatel7477 I know but people are thinking that web apps are only websites i'm sure they have knowledge about native apps development but it's much easier to make 1 web app to distribute to everyone rather than deal with compatibility issues
Don't undervalue notifications! They can be good for reminders, music control, alarms, status updates and really improve the retention rate of your app.
No need to explain. Notification is a very important thing itself. Without it we may lose almost 50% of the smartness of mobile phones. So many heavy use cases are required to have notification. Strong notification delivery is also compulsory as the web doesn't provide this
Me starts learning we development This guy why you shouldn't learn web development Next starts learning android development This guy why you shouldn't learn android development
As web developer and mobile developer, I think you are wrong because mobile app can do everything that web app can do but web app can't do everything like mobile app. So, we still should build a mobile app anyway.
Oh right, cuz we all want our apps to load forever under the weight of numerous poorly optimized JavaScript frameworks. Boo-hoo, poor software engineers don’t wanna learn to build good software, so everyone should suffer. This is what software development has become. First we saw language abstractization. Who needs these pointers and memory management, ew, too hard. Better wrap every element and even every operator into a chain of classes! Now that’s fast - to develop, but not to run. And voilà, now everyone builds slow sh*tware prone to memory leaks. Now we see this f*cking tendency to build everything on the web. And who knows what next.
sounds about right but what if you wanted to make an application like spotify, or discord, or like signal? it's better for me that some dudes are believing this, so i can have more probability of landing a job. let me tell you something, think about RFID application that are being used in every single business that needs tracking. what are you supposed to do with a web app? will you be able to scan barcodes, qr codes that fast with RFID devices? and those devices are built with Android. not iOS, not with a library. and thats where you need Android app development. if you need an intense app like spotify or RFID devices example, you need native development. and also good knowledge of basics of linux
Nah, it is really inconvenient to use web apps on mobile. They're great on PC but on mobile it's just inconvenient, an app is much better to use so makes sense to build one
Native mobile apps are optimised for better user experience on mobile. Web pages trying to work on a mobile app are mostly crap and annoy the hell out of me as a user. So nah.
as a web developer this guy is bullshting only simple apps that for most of the parts are serving users some data like social media apps have this ability and even in those situations for getting a much better performance companies make there apps like Instagram twitter whats app there are simple apps just simply transform data but still for better performance , better UX and support they make there apps with native language like swift and java or they use things like react native and flutter apps will not die so soon (im a 3+ years experienced web developer who knows some react native )
I can't track user's live geolocation with a web application unless it's instance is running in focus and the phone is unlocked. So nope, you should build native apps, as long as you must do so.
It's not about just, creating APPs. We need professionals to maintain, to fix, to improve it. Like Daft punks say; Work it Make it Do it Makes us ( it ) Harder Better Faster Stronger
It's called Deceptive Pushing - scare people away from your wheelhouse to minimize competition, so you feel special, else feel others or Ai won't take your job.
One thing web can't do yet, at least as far as I'm aware, is Bluetooth stuff. If you've got some specialty equipment there's no going around an app. Plus I can do a webapp and a normal app with flutter so I get the best of both worlds.
Internet connection slow, and boom your stupid web app can't open. But I agree that often for a startup you might try a web app first to test the waters.
People, try FLUTTER and you will love it. Engineers: please make more FLUTTER PACKAGES so that it would become the killer multi platform framework of our age. Flutter stands for F uck yeah it’s the future!
You SHOULD build a mobile app (and that is the only correct video to make). A dev's job is to meet the needs of phone users and a half-assed website that is referred to as a "web app" to mislead people into using it, is not what we need. We need developers to actually do their job.
I am using react native for building video calling app. Gotta say that react native is not the best to do it. It doesn't give performance like other languages. And also Webrtc library is missing lots of features which is included in react JS. Only advantage is that we can develop on both platform
@@proNOOBIE_ That's an SDK. I don't know about Agora that much. Even though they will be using some kind of Webrtc. For mobile it will probably react native webtc. The normal web / desk SDK with Webrtc adapter doesn't play nicely with mobile platforms. And the mobile version might be missing a lot of things . For example stun switching since we don't get rtcrtpsender on mobile version
@@proNOOBIE_ Also I am not using third party SDK for this since it will limit the flexibility and features. Plus my company wants to make an SDK of their own
@@Shalinity I use both all the time they are the same if anything its super easy to transfer your skills. TBH native apps are still really useful the mobile browser isn't ready for rendering heavy graphics just yet. This is why native apps are way better.
don't worry man this doni is saying true things but andriod development will never die, it will if android dies but nevertheless if you master react native you can easily master another language or api cause you will learn core programming language from what you're doing rn, keep learning it will be of worth!
Then there's ME who barely use web applications in the past years. I think Mobile App is the easiest form of accessibility for those Web Applications. If you have no presence in Mobile Application I think you're missing 70% or more of the population!
Your title isn't entirely correct. For a business it's true they need to evaluate whether a native mobile app would serve them. But what about the developers?
Im Sr. Android developer . U can build these in web thats right..but its shit as hell man .+ my salary is 3x web developer btw😐+web will replace native apps when sun 🔆 is hidden forever
Lol, just a bad take. There are downsides to apps but I didn't hear em here. You just pointed out that the web can do many things that native can. Congratulations, but that isn't a downside for native 😂. Here are some real downsides: 1. Users need to download the app. This adds friction to the growing process. 2. Apps take up space on the phone. 3. Getting an app approved is a hassle. 4. A website is available for more devices than an app. 5. The app store takes a cut from micro transactions
I have to agree with this one WebApps are more lightweight than mobile application. WebApps are faster and more efficient. So you're right 👍 but creating a mobile application is also good to learn.
@@codegambit2507 haha WebApps are faster maybe internet troubles is the problem, but web Apps are faster because on a mobile app the more the updates extra dependencies are being added to the app so this means less storage on the user's phone but websites and WebApps access files and other metadata with ease
Considering you said you’ll release a video on why you also should build an app shows you know both pros and cons on it so I won’t judge this too much. 😅 cause it’s true everything is on web now but everyone is on their phone 24/7 everything being run on apps. Plus mobile development is very niche thus a good place to getting a good place for getting jobs 🎉
Video will come for why you SHOULD build an app :) so don’t think I hate you
Can you make a video on this detailed ...
Like start with a web application using APIs and if there is a requirement for a mobile app, then we can easily go since we have developed APIs
For this we need to decide on which point we need to go for app development and what type of architecture we need to use, that makes it easy to move to mobile app development
I want to understand that..
Like iOS push notifications 😀
@@shanmukhapatil7131 you don't need capable enough to ask a question correctly. I suggest working on that first and then programming. Good luck !
@@sebastianzdroana7834 okay bro
@@sebastianzdroana7834 updated brother, hope you can now understand what i am trying to say
Please stop this kind of clickbait.
Exactly
"Here's why you should handwrite instead of type"
That's only an advantage if you have experience in webdev. If you are proficient with Java it'll be easier to write native android apps then go through some weird library to get a website (I'm neither so sorry if there's a very obvious solution)
That's a great point!
@@CodingWithLewis thx for knowledge
Bro 😂😂 literally reality is opposite , people use all sorts of apps to handle the pdfs , edit images , listen songs , make payments , etc
Makes a good point but building one from scratch is good practice 👍
I start learn english and i watch you speak, is can be improve my english thank you 😍
You know what? It's nice to hear your perspective and it actually makes sense. Thanks for that.
I'd like to know more about this topic and I wonder if you could flush it out further in another video.
Try using those web apps with no or limited internet and then get back to me. Mobile apps gives the user the ability to use the app offline if need be.
"research" - shows some nameless blog post.
Just for spec topic so its really not for everyone 🤷🏻.
He probably automatically create these videos with stock photos with sone kind of py bot, so there will be things that don’t make sense
@@AleOnTH-cam no?
I mean, the information in the blog itself isn't false. The average person most likely uses less than half of all apps on their phone, on a daily basis.
@@NigerianWeeb most likely doesn't count as a statistic.
actually web apps are slower and janky sometimes. For products I usually use, I prefer downloading the app.
True websites are slower on my phone and its boring
Nice answer
Only true for nartive apps and not for apps that just hosts the web code
You ducking say that but it’s because your ok downloading a 50mb once and waiting like 10 minutes for it to install but if the website take more then 3 seconds to load with the same functionality as that app you like nah it’s too long. Websites are constrained by this, if you would wait the same amount of time and then install a website as a pwa then you’d get the same functionality but unfortunately websites are thought of as different from an app even though they are the same
@@sc76399 Well websites are inherently made for quick access whereas apps are made for reliable and regular access
On the next episode “This is why you shouldnt breathe”
Threatening
scary
😂😂
Research
only 25% of the population breathes
Source - Trust me bro!
Hes on about nothing lol how is he going to store data locally without an app, not everyone wants to use the internet connection for everything
@@nesletchimaew9209LocalStorage
@@nesletchimaew9209web is best
@@nesletchimaew9209you can probably do web apps that store things locally. like syncthing
@@nesletchimaew9209 no way you don’t know how to store data locally, cookies exist for a reason
Noted but still gonna make one.
That's a open threat
Lol
Did u make one
lol that was mean 😂
Tell me you're a web dev without telling me you're a web dev
All phone apps are glorified web apps
@@AcidiFy574ok I believe you my child.
@@AcidiFy574 , the entire point of a mobile app is that you can pull out your small and easily portable phone to use it at any time. This video completely ignores while MOBILE apps were invented.
@@Shark-hn4mvThis proves that you don't know what web technologies can do because what you just described CAN be done using web technologies. You can install the app from the app store and open it from and icon
@@Shark-hn4mvPWAs have entered the chat
Imagine someone really believes in this, lol. Mobiledev won't die soon.
Websites are not convenient for users logically following its better to have a mobile app for companies to promote their businesses. Its better start with startup for small entrepreneurs but then its must have to have an app if they want to grow bigger and attract a huge audience
@@Drannn54 true!
@@Drannn54 isn't that what he said tho? Like building a todo app is redundant. But something for ur company is kinda expected..
@Westerner please explain why you think that because I hardly ever download any app I can access on the web
@@sqfzerzefsdf well a majority of people still use 2 to 3 year old devices which lag greatly when you apply too much css on it.
If you add less styling the app would just look dull and kinda like "atleast it works".
On the other hand Mobile apps are much more optimised for those hardware and you don't have to worry about responsive design.
You'll be missing a lot more customers if you don't make a mobile app that's optimised enough to run on most devices.
I am a self employed mobile app developer. This advice is hilarious.
Which tech stack would you suggest learning please?
@@EUU100 it depends on the language you know. i use java/Kotlin for native android and C# for ios and windows
but i prefer C# since you can use Unity to develop awesome mobile games and 3D apps
@@anasabubakar4125 thanks for taking the time to reply. I started kotlin 3 days ago and I've been enjoying it so far, I will look into Java and c# in the future
@@EUU100 swift and Kotlin
Beautiful/stable interfaces also? I find webapps look and act crappy on my phone. It may be just the case for the apps I came across.
Well it depends on whether or not the website considered actually supporting mobile web usage
Websites are not convenient for users logically following its better to have a mobile app for companies to promote their businesses. Its better start with startup for small entrepreneurs but then its must have to have an app if they want to grow bigger and attract a huge audience
Probably because they aren't tested properly.
As android developer, i am offended 😂
How mobile apps were UI design?
Like webs are designed by css, so how java do that?
same bro 🤣
@@ganeshmk2652 java/kotlin using xml,
@@ganeshmk2652 java isn't popular in android development anymore its kotlin
@@JoeMemes Still used and the two can be jointed.. also it’s better for starters.
I would develop a mobile app just to avoid Javascript
Native Performance left the chat..
As a user I‘m sometimes annoyed by this approach - the amazon app is really just the website and it feels that way. Native iOS Apps have a different way of navigating than a website and when I open an App, I want to have this workflow. But of course starting with a website is a great way to start and then you can add specific custom items and workflows for the different operating systems with React native e.g.
As an android Amazon user. I like the app better than going to the web browser and doing it. But idk might just be me
Well… why tf would they make the app different from the website 😂😂
@@-keiskx1774 why would they then create an app if you could just go on the web?
@@simonkraemer3725 the app feels fine for me on iOS, what are you talking about?
You can achieve a near native feel with PWA’s if you’re skilled enough.
People basically like to open a software rather than search everytime
No need to search or open a browser. PWA
@@mgr1282 pwa is shit
a lot of apps/softwares nowadays are just web browser displaying a website.
@@Vivi-xn9iz They have to do it because they want to be in touch with users. And they can't afford to create native apps or possibly don't have knowledge about native apps development.
@@gulabpatel7477 I know but people are thinking that web apps are only websites
i'm sure they have knowledge about native apps development but it's much easier to make 1 web app to distribute to everyone rather than deal with compatibility issues
What you are suggesting is right, but only from a developer's perspective, from a client's perspective, achieving the best user experience is a must.
Stop demotivating and fear mongering.
Hands down worst video you’ve posted yet !
I respect your opinion 🙏
@@CodingWithLewis 🤣🤣
Bro I’m trying so hard for months now to be an android app dev and this just made me shit my pants…
Hhhhhhhh i feel u bro
🤣 You are good dude!! Android devs is a high in demand industry.
Just stick one thing!
@@CodingWithLewis good thing then because my future depends on it 😅🤣
I am into flutter and i shit my pants too
You can't access file system freely in the web
Don't undervalue notifications! They can be good for reminders, music control, alarms, status updates and really improve the retention rate of your app.
No need to explain.
Notification is a very important thing itself. Without it we may lose almost 50% of the smartness of mobile phones. So many heavy use cases are required to have notification. Strong notification delivery is also compulsory as the web doesn't provide this
Developers prefer web apps, non-developers prefer mobile apps. Unless your target are developers, mobile apps are the way to go.
Me starts learning we development
This guy why you shouldn't learn web development
Next starts learning android development
This guy why you shouldn't learn android development
I WoUld jUst sTiCk tO tHe wEB
- some guy
As web developer and mobile developer, I think you are wrong because mobile app can do everything that web app can do but web app can't do everything like mobile app.
So, we still should build a mobile app anyway.
Oh right, cuz we all want our apps to load forever under the weight of numerous poorly optimized JavaScript frameworks. Boo-hoo, poor software engineers don’t wanna learn to build good software, so everyone should suffer. This is what software development has become. First we saw language abstractization. Who needs these pointers and memory management, ew, too hard. Better wrap every element and even every operator into a chain of classes! Now that’s fast - to develop, but not to run. And voilà, now everyone builds slow sh*tware prone to memory leaks. Now we see this f*cking tendency to build everything on the web. And who knows what next.
sounds about right but what if you wanted to make an application like spotify, or discord, or like signal? it's better for me that some dudes are believing this, so i can have more probability of landing a job. let me tell you something, think about RFID application that are being used in every single business that needs tracking. what are you supposed to do with a web app? will you be able to scan barcodes, qr codes that fast with RFID devices? and those devices are built with Android. not iOS, not with a library. and thats where you need Android app development. if you need an intense app like spotify or RFID devices example, you need native development. and also good knowledge of basics of linux
Nah, it is really inconvenient to use web apps on mobile. They're great on PC but on mobile it's just inconvenient, an app is much better to use so makes sense to build one
The entire point of mobile apps is that they're mobile and can be pulled out anywhere at any time.
Native mobile apps are optimised for better user experience on mobile. Web pages trying to work on a mobile app are mostly crap and annoy the hell out of me as a user. So nah.
You are still living in the 2010 👀
as a web developer this guy is bullshting
only simple apps that for most of the parts are serving users some data like social media apps have this ability and even in those situations for getting a much better performance companies make there apps like Instagram twitter whats app there are simple apps just simply transform data but still for better performance , better UX and support they make there apps with native language like swift and java or they use things like react native and flutter
apps will not die so soon
(im a 3+ years experienced web developer who knows some react native )
I can't track user's live geolocation with a web application unless it's instance is running in focus and the phone is unlocked. So nope, you should build native apps, as long as you must do so.
Web app is shit !!!!! Specially with performance and user experiences !!! Also you can’t do a lot of things with web instead native
Ah yes, let me just take my laptop to the gym to listen to music on TH-cam.
Ever heard of progressive web apps?
Lack of common sense in this vid... 😐
It's not about just, creating APPs. We need professionals to maintain, to fix, to improve it. Like Daft punks say;
Work it
Make it
Do it
Makes us ( it )
Harder
Better
Faster
Stronger
It's called Deceptive Pushing - scare people away from your wheelhouse to minimize competition, so you feel special, else feel others or Ai won't take your job.
As a mobile and web dev i completely disagree with this
What about in developing countries where the internet sucks or is just expensive?
Think about the users not the developers.. Business 101😅
Bro i learnt flutter dart programming language used to develop native mobile apps. But now I am worried after this video 🥲
You shouldn't be. Do some research yourself
Dont worry. I prefer the apps over web browser. I will use your app. 😂😂🤞
Horrible advice. I was looking for ios development course and came up to this video. Guess, I know whose channel I should not watch 😂
"This why you shouldn't breath through your nose, bringing through your nose sounds like fun, but you could literally breathe through your mouth."
One thing web can't do yet, at least as far as I'm aware, is Bluetooth stuff. If you've got some specialty equipment there's no going around an app.
Plus I can do a webapp and a normal app with flutter so I get the best of both worlds.
Yep!
i always search for something and this DUDE ALWAYSS "WHY YOU SHOULDN'T" like bruh leave me breath ffs
As a wise man once said:
"Do not develop his app Jerry"
I don't think that man is very wise hahaha
Internet connection slow, and boom your stupid web app can't open. But I agree that often for a startup you might try a web app first to test the waters.
Yes some apps can be developed as both web and mobile apps however the mobile version will deliver better quality and much better user experience
Well, You sholdn't stick to the web anymore! IOS is dropping support for them...
Gotta love those calculator Apps that need 200 MB of RAM to run.
🤮 how about I stick to building apps that I would use, instead of pumping out webshit
I will still develop mobile apps 👍
Nah I want more customers for my product. Mobile apps are significantly more profitable
People, try FLUTTER and you will love it. Engineers: please make more FLUTTER PACKAGES so that it would become the killer multi platform framework of our age. Flutter stands for F uck yeah it’s the future!
It's great but lacks backend resources
yeah mate +1 flutter is killer
@@trevortrevose9124 u can use firebase
You SHOULD build a mobile app (and that is the only correct video to make). A dev's job is to meet the needs of phone users and a half-assed website that is referred to as a "web app" to mislead people into using it, is not what we need. We need developers to actually do their job.
Your completely forgetting brand loyalty and ease of use
Honestly, whenever I get a notification through chrome I straight up block the site. Looks tacky in the android UI.
As a developer with years of experience. I can confidently say you don't know what you talking about..
I am using react native for building video calling app. Gotta say that react native is not the best to do it. It doesn't give performance like other languages. And also Webrtc library is missing lots of features which is included in react JS. Only advantage is that we can develop on both platform
Use agora
@@proNOOBIE_ That's an SDK. I don't know about Agora that much. Even though they will be using some kind of Webrtc. For mobile it will probably react native webtc. The normal web / desk SDK with Webrtc adapter doesn't play nicely with mobile platforms. And the mobile version might be missing a lot of things . For example stun switching since we don't get rtcrtpsender on mobile version
@@proNOOBIE_ Also I am not using third party SDK for this since it will limit the flexibility and features. Plus my company wants to make an SDK of their own
Can i upload the Web to play store? Because i can do all that on Web this days.
I just can't imagine how many mobile dev students got demotivated and lost their interest in android devlopment by this video
A random guy on TH-cam should not be able to demotivate them. Also, it doesn't say do not learn mobile development. 😊😊
If Google deprecating the Deprecated didn't demotivated them, how did this video do it? 😂
Screw this guy follow your dream pursue your visions you’ll be mad if you didn’t try.💯
I'd always prefer a mobile app than opening the website in mobile browser. Nothing beats the native app experience
I am the opposite. I'll only download an app when I know I use it everyday. Otherwise I prefer the web.
There's still a huge demand for native developers on the market and on average we earn more than frontend web developers...
That's very true :) I didn't say you shouldn't learn mobile apps!
I disagree with you completely on this sir.
So on android push notifications can be done?
Yes they can be!
whay about making use of the sensors, gps, giroscope, and other sensors oj the phone as input for our data?
apps still have a place
Crying in react native :)
same 😅
But if you know react native it’s very easy to transfer your skills to react?
@@dD-tn8tf hello ! Yes it's quite similar, but learning react will be better rather than learning react native first
@@Shalinity I use both all the time they are the same if anything its super easy to transfer your skills. TBH native apps are still really useful the mobile browser isn't ready for rendering heavy graphics just yet. This is why native apps are way better.
I would put a paper if asked me to work on hybrid
Mobile App is far better than Web I've seen both of them.
🥺🥺🥺😓 and i just started learning react native
don't worry man this doni is saying true things but andriod development will never die, it will if android dies but nevertheless if you master react native you can easily master another language or api cause you will learn core programming language from what you're doing rn, keep learning it will be of worth!
Don't you think anything like that.
React Native is the most high in demand for cross platform applications or mobile applications in general
People built mobile games and there not complaining
Imagine people spending thousands of dollars on a new iPhone just to access website
Yup that's what phones are
Then there's ME who barely use web applications in the past years.
I think Mobile App is the easiest form of accessibility for those Web Applications. If you have no presence in Mobile Application I think you're missing 70% or more of the population!
High performance left the chat
Your title isn't entirely correct. For a business it's true they need to evaluate whether a native mobile app would serve them. But what about the developers?
Developers need to make the right decision that will save them on development time :) that being said, mobile apps still have lots of use cases!
please stop telling people to create web apps😐💀
Or just use Flutter and build it everywhere
Not ideal for web. Flutter + react for website
Im Sr. Android developer .
U can build these in web thats right..but its shit as hell man .+ my salary is 3x web developer btw😐+web will replace native apps when sun 🔆 is hidden forever
Yes, that's a bullshit.
🔥 I *HATE* mobile apps! I do everything I can to avoid them, always preferring web apps on PC, so yeah, I agree 💯!!!
BS. Web is very far away from native experience. And it feels.
Not very far away at all, but it is behind still :)
@@CodingWithLewis Web browsers add another layer of software, and that can make for poor performance on low-end devices. Ask me how I know.
@@CodingWithLewis bro you don't know how to make native apps so you do this type of video correct??
Are you watching this vedio in web😎
I'm with your thought 💭. yes web is way better than apps. most people don't know that.
What kind of awful advice is this
Salute Lewis… awesome content as always… 👋🏻🇮🇹
Lol, just a bad take. There are downsides to apps but I didn't hear em here. You just pointed out that the web can do many things that native can. Congratulations, but that isn't a downside for native 😂.
Here are some real downsides:
1. Users need to download the app. This adds friction to the growing process.
2. Apps take up space on the phone.
3. Getting an app approved is a hassle.
4. A website is available for more devices than an app.
5. The app store takes a cut from micro transactions
So wrong, web on mobile sucks
I have to agree with this one WebApps are more lightweight than mobile application. WebApps are faster and more efficient. So you're right 👍 but creating a mobile application is also good to learn.
Agreed!
"Faster"? I don't think you know what you are talking about
@@codegambit2507 haha WebApps are faster maybe internet troubles is the problem, but web Apps are faster because on a mobile app the more the updates extra dependencies are being added to the app so this means less storage on the user's phone but websites and WebApps access files and other metadata with ease
@@CreativeTutorialsWeb I still don't think you know what you are talking about
@@codegambit2507 Yeah right okay then 😂
Considering you said you’ll release a video on why you also should build an app shows you know both pros and cons on it so I won’t judge this too much. 😅 cause it’s true everything is on web now but everyone is on their phone 24/7 everything being run on apps. Plus mobile development is very niche thus a good place to getting a good place for getting jobs 🎉
you forget to mention that business apps are important and the majority of the app store shareholding
Converting web apps to desktop apps however is a fantastic idea... If your web app needs to run local files without them being uploaded.