"U IS a CRIMINAL" not dismissed but held account by law but the not allowed people are likely invaders to take over security jobs and out all the hwites
It's not often you find a clued up security guard, when you do it's usually because they watch Audit Videos. I might stand Invoicing the SIA for the additional Training Services I provide
@@ade3628 no, because lots of you think the job is below you, and also, because many of you are weak spermed incels still living at home. Get of the internet and go find a woman or two and make some babies. you aint slowly being replaced, you are being out fucked.
Im 100% sure some of these security guards have actually watched these videos and just come out to be on the Internet. If they didn't want to be filmed, they would check their protocol before leaving their premises. Obviously some are just stupid and ignorant and dont know the rules 😂😂😂
You should start reporting these encounters as this is pure harassment from these goons. They can not tell anyone what to do outside on the footpath. Also they are refusing to give you information you need to obtain a copy of the photos they are taking which is in breach of GDPR laws.
Fair play to the man with the weird beard, that is genuinely a skill the way he talked over you about GDPR. It was a tactic designed purely to encourage you to lash out, well done on not taking the bait. Someone who wants to antagonise people like that has no business being in a security role though
6:52 & 8:30 🙄 Jesus 😳!!! It’s an interruption factory. It’s non stop 🫣. Don’t think I’ve ever seen the middle of someone’s sentences interrupt the beginning of someone else’s so many times in a row 😄. Must be fun growing up n their houses 😬😮🫢
Testing your rights is fair game, no issue, but have seen a few of your videos where you are demonstrating a lack of understanding of the things you are saying. Firstly s33 cja doesn't confer you any rights, let alone unfettered unhindered access to places. You fail to understand that access anywhere within the precinct of their privately owned property is conferred by implied permission. Similarly when accessing Tesco owned land. If you are behaving in a manner which conflicts with the conditions of use of their property, as long as lawful, they can request you desist what it is that breaches said conditions. Failure may result in your implied permission being rescinded meaning your presence on their privately owned property will be without permission and as such a trespasser. At which point they can lawfully ask you to leave their property, and a refusal would then permit them to use no more than reasonable force to enforce the demand. You can spout s33, but a place is only publicity accessible if you have or are permitted to have access, without that permission it is then not a public place to you any longer. As for article 10 etc and other hra legislation, you do understand that much of it is based on being qualified, that's to say you don't have carte blanche to do as you please if it causes infringements on other people's lawful rights. You have freedom of expression, but within the bounds of the law. Trespassing on privately land after having permission withdrawn and refusing to leave that private land wouldn't be circumvented by article 10. Police and security are clueless as well which is why you get away with it, as well as it not being worth all the aggro over a few metres of land. I don't see a big issue with filming etc, but your information is wrong and could lead to people getting caught out by following it, if they encounter people actually clued up.
If people couldn't access or leave the building because the photographer's were blocking the doors, then their would be evidence. As there would be several people unable to enter or leave. Yet I saw several people enter and leave the building without any issues at all.
More incompetent security from foreign countries And what is that stupid thing on his chin. Doesn’t he realise it looks ridiculous. Obviously not I suppose. I would like to see these companies get huge fines from the independent commissioners office. And where where the SIA badges. That should be reported.
If he would not give you the Data Controller details then you had every right to enter the building and get them either from a pubic display or from reception - it is your legal right to obtain the DC details.
You are mistaken, the only one that needs educating is sa, section 33 nonsense, they were actually correct in what they said, and just disengaged cottoning on to what was happening.
Being " a member of the public " is unfortunately not a recognised exemption from GDPR. If your pictures / footage are only ever going to be used for private, domestic purposes then no specific exemption from GDPR needs to be stated or claimed but when it comes to PUBLISHING potential personally identifying data, GDPR and the Data Protection Act DO apply ... UNLESS ... you fit the criteria to be able to claim a proscribed Exemption. There are proscribed exemptions to GDPR and the most appropriate one for "Auditors / Social Media Bloggers / Vloggers" to claim (where applicable) is the exemption for "Journalism, academia, art and literature" ... The big question which would determine whether this exemption would apply or not would of course be > Who can call themselves a Journalist and what kind of material would and wouldn't be considered worthy of publication in the public interest !? ( see below ) - - - Exemption for "Journalism, academia, art and literature" ... This exemption can apply if you process personal data for: journalistic purposes; academic purposes; artistic purposes; or literary purposes. Together, these are known as the ‘special purposes’. This exemption relieves you from your obligations regarding the UK GDPR’s provisions on: all the principles, except the security and accountability principles; the lawful bases; the conditions for consent; children’s consent; the conditions for processing special categories of personal data and data about criminal convictions and offences; processing not requiring identification; the right to be informed; all the other individual rights, except rights related to automated individual decision-making including profiling; the communication of personal data breaches to individuals; consultation with the ICO for high risk processing; international transfers of personal data; and cooperation and consistency between supervisory authorities. - - - Extract from TIMELEX web site ... *Is a TH-camr a journalist?* The Court of Justice of the European Union, in a judgment of 14 February 2019, gave an interesting answer to that question. The Court was asked to answer the Latvian Supreme Court if the recording, in a police station, of police officers carrying out procedural measures and publication of the video on TH-cam, may be regarded as the processing of personal data for journalistic purposes. The case of Mr. Buivids The case relates to a Mr. Buivids, who made a video recording in a station of the Latvian national police while he was making a statement in the context of administrative proceedings which had been brought against him. He filmed his meeting with the police officers secretly using his mobile phone and published the recorded video on TH-cam The Latvian data protection agency estimated that Mr. Buivids violated the data protection legislation by having videotaped the police officers without informing them and requested him to remove the video from the internet. In its decision of 14 February 2018, the Court of Justice first refers to its former jurisprudence according to which, in order to take account of the importance of the right to freedom of expression in every democratic society, it is necessary to interpret notions relating to that freedom, such as journalism, broadly. More precisely: ‘Journalistic activities’ are those which have as their purpose the disclosure to the public of information, opinions or ideas, irrespective of the medium which is used to transmit them. In other words, you don’t have to work as a professional journalist for a media undertaking to be qualified as a journalist. This jurisprudence has been confirmed by Recital 153 of the GDPR. On the other hand, the Court emphasises that: The view cannot be taken that all information published on the internet, involving personal data, comes under the concept of ‘journalistic activities’ and thus benefits from the exemptions or derogations. In order to benefit from the exemptions and derogations granted to the processing of personal data for journalistic purposes, information has to be published on the internet for the sole purpose of the disclosure to the public of information, opinions or ideas.
They are not breaking the law just for taking a photo of you (same as capturing you on CCTV), however they will be breaking the law if they publish or distribute the photo/video of you.
Euroclear is a clearing-house for some financial investments and types of securities. It is like a third-party in a transaction that pays the "winner" and takes from the loser. Oversimplifying here but pretty much it. They take a %age of the sum as a fee.
" Individuals can be subject to the GDPR, if their data processing is beyond the scope of “purely personal or household activity” as defined in Article 2 of the GDPR. The regulation does not apply to the processing of personal data by a natural person for purely personal or household activity." It can reasonably be argued that taking a video that you later post on TH-cam takes you out of 'purely personal or household activity' rendering you liable to GDPR regulations. Better understand what is involved in that!
Why are all of the security guards allergic to letting people finish their sentences. Is it a cultural thing? Is it that they just have so much of melanin in their ears they don’t realize you’re still speaking?
In a corner of a building like this, it could be discussed wether that area is public or private. It depends of, if that area belongs to the house or not.... I guess...!?!
It's actually their ignorance of the law that allowed you to remain. Had they known the law better, they would have known they could escort you off the property.
@stepbackandthink, he was never on their property. Even if they claim that part of the pavement in front of the building is their property, they could probably escort him about a foot away, which would achieve nothing except expose their pettiness.
@@musiclover9361They weren’t advised correctly though. This is often a cause of confusion by auditors that don’t really fully understand the law themselves.
![ลองสุ่มไอโฟน 990 โกงมั้ย? [ โกงมั้ยครับ ep.101 ] | DOM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bfsWe0j492k/mqdefault.jpg)
Didn’t know Tutankhamun moonlighted as incompetent security 🤔
LOL
Love it
Tit the hoon, more like.
Steady, he will set the sphinx on you. 😁
Don't argue with idiots who talk over you
@@AD-53 look at the eyes of that black man.......looks like he wants to k.......lll someone !
The problem with this kind of box ticking security is that I doubt they would be of any use in an emergency situation.
headless chickens
As soon as security get it wrong they should be dismissed.
Or discipline and retraining
"U IS a CRIMINAL"
not dismissed but held account by law
but the not allowed people are likely invaders to take over security jobs and out all the hwites
Big flash building but if you're gonna pay peanuts, youre gonna ge...oh i better not😅
Monkeys... There. Said it
God you are so good at this. The way you speak is so clear you get your voice heard love it. Getting better young man 👍
Thanks Ann, Wish I was a young man
@@scorpionaudits me too lol woman
I find it shocking that almost every security guards DON'T KNOW THE LAW. it's part of their job. Owned them once again. ✊️
It's not often you find a clued up security guard, when you do it's usually because they watch Audit Videos. I might stand Invoicing the SIA for the additional Training Services I provide
@@scorpionaudits Good idea ! 😄👍
@@GlasgowCelticforever1888 Not proper one's at that.
Given the sparse amount of justice we see, its extremely satisfying to finally see SA getting the respect he has so surely commanded. Good show !
Thanks EA, we must do a joint audit together.
They endeavour to force pedantry, while you by contrast 'successfully apply' pragmatism!
Thankyou. 😊
Was that guy with the gold foil thing on his chin from the circus? He is a clown.
Looks like a large worm. I'm sorry but its not a good fashion idea to display a gold magot.
He's a good one though.
Thinks he's fuqin pharaoh.
I thought it was Ming The Merciless!!
@@ruddock7 Ruler of the universe.
Now where's Flash?
He's got a stinger on the end of his chinny chin chin 😂
Why does England import all that human refuse to act as security?
Because we're slowly being replaced
@@ade3628 no, because lots of you think the job is below you, and also, because many of you are weak spermed incels still living at home. Get of the internet and go find a woman or two and make some babies. you aint slowly being replaced, you are being out fucked.
You got a chicken leg on your beard mate
I just found your channel. I Liked, Subscribed and hit the Notification Bell.
Thanks, appreciate that
That guard might look respectable but he clearly is lacking in people skills and he is lacking in laws
Thick as P S.
Im 100% sure some of these security guards have actually watched these videos and just come out to be on the Internet. If they didn't want to be filmed, they would check their protocol before leaving their premises.
Obviously some are just stupid and ignorant and dont know the rules 😂😂😂
You should start reporting these encounters as this is pure harassment from these goons. They can not tell anyone what to do outside on the footpath. Also they are refusing to give you information you need to obtain a copy of the photos they are taking which is in breach of GDPR laws.
Security are always clueless and unprofessional is the norm . Retired lifeboatman
As well as looking stupid, he actually was stupid, without doubt ! Education dispensed 👍
Interesting and strong vlog. The great unwashed will just follow what this aggressive security commands.
Fair play to the man with the weird beard, that is genuinely a skill the way he talked over you about GDPR. It was a tactic designed purely to encourage you to lash out, well done on not taking the bait. Someone who wants to antagonise people like that has no business being in a security role though
Thanks....he tried
Who walks around with a ice cream cornet on their chin.
Mr Whippy.
'Ghostbusters' 🤣🤣🤣 ALWAYS brilliant content SA, thank you!
6:52 & 8:30 🙄 Jesus 😳!!! It’s an interruption factory. It’s non stop 🫣. Don’t think I’ve ever seen the middle of someone’s sentences interrupt the beginning of someone else’s so many times in a row 😄. Must be fun growing up n their houses 😬😮🫢
Testing your rights is fair game, no issue, but have seen a few of your videos where you are demonstrating a lack of understanding of the things you are saying. Firstly s33 cja doesn't confer you any rights, let alone unfettered unhindered access to places. You fail to understand that access anywhere within the precinct of their privately owned property is conferred by implied permission. Similarly when accessing Tesco owned land. If you are behaving in a manner which conflicts with the conditions of use of their property, as long as lawful, they can request you desist what it is that breaches said conditions. Failure may result in your implied permission being rescinded meaning your presence on their privately owned property will be without permission and as such a trespasser. At which point they can lawfully ask you to leave their property, and a refusal would then permit them to use no more than reasonable force to enforce the demand. You can spout s33, but a place is only publicity accessible if you have or are permitted to have access, without that permission it is then not a public place to you any longer. As for article 10 etc and other hra legislation, you do understand that much of it is based on being qualified, that's to say you don't have carte blanche to do as you please if it causes infringements on other people's lawful rights. You have freedom of expression, but within the bounds of the law. Trespassing on privately land after having permission withdrawn and refusing to leave that private land wouldn't be circumvented by article 10. Police and security are clueless as well which is why you get away with it, as well as it not being worth all the aggro over a few metres of land. I don't see a big issue with filming etc, but your information is wrong and could lead to people getting caught out by following it, if they encounter people actually clued up.
If people couldn't access or leave the building because the photographer's were blocking the doors, then their would be evidence. As there would be several people unable to enter or leave. Yet I saw several people enter and leave the building without any issues at all.
Exactly my point
Love a constructive challenge based on fact SA, well handled.
Thanks
Hi great video, bloody Nora those guys had no idea about the law, are security guards where’s sia badge . Regards mark
Thanks Mark
More incompetent security from foreign countries And what is that stupid thing on his chin. Doesn’t he realise it looks ridiculous. Obviously not I suppose. I would like to see these companies get huge fines from the independent commissioners office. And where where the SIA badges. That should be reported.
Great job fella's ! love your vids.
Thanks, appreciate that
The old Corp of Commissionaires would have had common sense and handled this situation professionally.
Turnip Act 2024 🧔🏾♂️👈🏽
Should have gone masked up, don’t let the bastards see your face.
What the hell is that on his beard 😂😂😂
Was going to write the same thing 😂
A man’s load that dried there.
First chap out had 5:25 some of his lunch hanging off his chin 😂😂😂😂
He thinks he’s a unicorn with his head upside down 😂
good job, because your right they think you have no rights
If he would not give you the Data Controller details then you had every right to enter the building and get them either from a pubic display or from reception - it is your legal right to obtain the DC details.
Bloomberg must've moved. They used to have a big office at Finsbury Square once upon a time with a free food cafeteria even for visitors!
Security need to educated and were very arrogant
Awesome pal 👍
Thanks 👍
Is that a 90 degree narwhal????
SIA Licence?
As you see you cannot converse with fools, great audit,continue the education 👍👍👍👍👍. Our once great country has been reduced to this , it’s pityful
You are mistaken, the only one that needs educating is sa, section 33 nonsense, they were actually correct in what they said, and just disengaged cottoning on to what was happening.
Do you receive your copies under gdpr ?
Via a Subject Access Request
Being " a member of the public " is unfortunately not a recognised exemption from GDPR. If your pictures / footage are only ever going to be used for private, domestic purposes then no specific exemption from GDPR needs to be stated or claimed but when it comes to PUBLISHING potential personally identifying data, GDPR and the Data Protection Act DO apply ... UNLESS ... you fit the criteria to be able to claim a proscribed Exemption.
There are proscribed exemptions to GDPR and the most appropriate one for "Auditors / Social Media Bloggers / Vloggers" to claim (where applicable) is the exemption for "Journalism, academia, art and literature" ... The big question which would determine whether this exemption would apply or not would of course be > Who can call themselves a Journalist and what kind of material would and wouldn't be considered worthy of publication in the public interest !? ( see below )
- - -
Exemption for "Journalism, academia, art and literature" ... This exemption can apply if you process personal data for:
journalistic purposes;
academic purposes;
artistic purposes; or
literary purposes.
Together, these are known as the ‘special purposes’.
This exemption relieves you from your obligations regarding the UK GDPR’s provisions on:
all the principles, except the security and accountability principles;
the lawful bases;
the conditions for consent;
children’s consent;
the conditions for processing special categories of personal data and data about criminal convictions and offences;
processing not requiring identification;
the right to be informed;
all the other individual rights, except rights related to automated individual decision-making including profiling;
the communication of personal data breaches to individuals;
consultation with the ICO for high risk processing;
international transfers of personal data; and
cooperation and consistency between supervisory authorities.
- - -
Extract from TIMELEX web site ...
*Is a TH-camr a journalist?*
The Court of Justice of the European Union, in a judgment of 14 February 2019, gave an interesting answer to that question.
The Court was asked to answer the Latvian Supreme Court if the recording, in a police station, of police officers carrying out procedural measures and publication of the video on TH-cam, may be regarded as the processing of personal data for journalistic purposes.
The case of Mr. Buivids
The case relates to a Mr. Buivids, who made a video recording in a station of the Latvian national police while he was making a statement in the context of administrative proceedings which had been brought against him. He filmed his meeting with the police officers secretly using his mobile phone and published the recorded video on TH-cam
The Latvian data protection agency estimated that Mr. Buivids violated the data protection legislation by having videotaped the police officers without informing them and requested him to remove the video from the internet.
In its decision of 14 February 2018, the Court of Justice first refers to its former jurisprudence according to which, in order to take account of the importance of the right to freedom of expression in every democratic society, it is necessary to interpret notions relating to that freedom, such as journalism, broadly. More precisely:
‘Journalistic activities’ are those which have as their purpose the disclosure to the public of information, opinions or ideas, irrespective of the medium which is used to transmit them.
In other words, you don’t have to work as a professional journalist for a media undertaking to be qualified as a journalist. This jurisprudence has been confirmed by Recital 153 of the GDPR.
On the other hand, the Court emphasises that:
The view cannot be taken that all information published on the internet, involving personal data, comes under the concept of ‘journalistic activities’ and thus benefits from the exemptions or derogations.
In order to benefit from the exemptions and derogations granted to the processing of personal data for journalistic purposes, information has to be published on the internet for the sole purpose of the disclosure to the public of information, opinions or ideas.
Great Comment
COMPLETLY CLUELESS SO CALLED SECURITY, AND STAFF, MORONS
Wtf has he got dangling from his chin?
He looks like a right muppet!
Very very rare I see security do the job properly, what training do they do, except drink coffee or tea
The fallacy of section 33 continues.
Guard looks ridiculous and sounds ridiculous talking over you. I found your videos 2 days or so ago and liked shared and subbed
Thanks, very much appreciated
They are not breaking the law just for taking a photo of you (same as capturing you on CCTV), however they will be breaking the law if they publish or distribute the photo/video of you.
Euroclear is a clearing-house for some financial investments and types of securities. It is like a third-party in a transaction that pays the "winner" and takes from the loser. Oversimplifying here but pretty much it. They take a %age of the sum as a fee.
SIA badges? There was a criminal conviction for failure to display recently I heard.
There are loads on the SIA Website, usually tied in with section 5 and Section 18 or 19
You have to close your eyes as you go past, just in case you see someone coming out...lmao...
Imported Attitudes.
Security are my favourite 😉👍
They never fail to let you down....
S head Invader 7wats always giving it the bigun.
Oh lovin your Energy 😁
Thanks
The standards of dress of City people has gone downhill. Suits and ties and proper work attire are things of the past since I retired or so it seems.
What has he got on his chin 😂😂😂
Where did you film ?
This was Cannon Street
You didn't mention about a possible breach of gdpr ?
Gdpr isn't relevant in the UK.
There's definitely a sting in your tail. 🦂
You got that right!
Sec.33 at No.33 … and an orange tie to boot
With matching pointy chin
“Challenge accepted”.
😂😂😂
3 ring circus
Get um told lol
What has that silly man with the orange tie got on his chin? It looks ridiculous. Is it something he is wearing for a bet?
What is that thing on his face. Is it his girlfriends bling tampax.
Sorry but your mate looks like a right berk with that camera on his head,, 😂😂
lol
" Individuals can be subject to the GDPR, if their data processing is beyond the scope of “purely personal or household activity” as defined in Article 2 of the GDPR. The regulation does not apply to the processing of personal data by a natural person for purely personal or household activity."
It can reasonably be argued that taking a video that you later post on TH-cam takes you out of 'purely personal or household activity' rendering you liable to GDPR regulations. Better understand what is involved in that!
Journalistic Exemption
Why are all of the security guards allergic to letting people finish their sentences. Is it a cultural thing? Is it that they just have so much of melanin in their ears they don’t realize you’re still speaking?
The whole thing is so juvenile from both sides!!
Who ya gonna call... audit buster's
Lol
Why does he have a spliff stuck to his chin?
Keeping it for “ron”
Secret antenna maybe ?😂
@@janbaukespoelstra6839 Ooh, I never thought of that!😆
In a corner of a building like this, it could be discussed wether that area is public or private. It depends of, if that area belongs to the house or not.... I guess...!?!
Just weird.....
What the hell is that on his chin 😂
What’s that thing on his chin called?
1992.
These guys NEVER follow through with anything !
well they often call the cops
SIA badges ????????????????????????????????????????????????????
It's actually their ignorance of the law that allowed you to remain. Had they known the law better, they would have known they could escort you off the property.
@stepbackandthink, he was never on their property. Even if they claim that part of the pavement in front of the building is their property, they could probably escort him about a foot away, which would achieve nothing except expose their pettiness.
@@musiclover9361 It’s certainly their property. It would have been about the principle, not the distance.
@@stepbackandthink they were advised three times on the precise law; Act and Section. They would have had no right to escort him anywhere.
@@musiclover9361They weren’t advised correctly though. This is often a cause of confusion by auditors that don’t really fully understand the law themselves.
@@stepbackandthink they were indeed advised correctly. The man cited the exact act and section.
What’s the deal with the carrot in that guys face?
So all in all after all that challenging yellow spike and co weren’t up for round 2 with SA…keep it up that was a good one.
why have these non British not got a clue of english law until they have the should not be employed
@@helmsdale100 why is he non British. I did not detect a foreign accent...
Why is he non British. I did not detect a foreign accent on the first guy with the weird thing in his beard.
No speekee engrish….wheres his sia pass?