Full Lecture: The Ultimate Aim of Psychoanalysis

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 47

  • @julianphilosophy
    @julianphilosophy  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Thank you for your attention today. You can find my “Complete Guide to Žižek” ebook here: www.patreon.com/julianphilosophy

  • @isaacgrant3784
    @isaacgrant3784 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    Your videos stand out from the rest.

    • @zoeasimaki6921
      @zoeasimaki6921 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      💯💯💯💯

  • @whowereweagain
    @whowereweagain 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What u say at the end... This is why I like guattari's observation that all fantasies are group fantasies, also his machinic unconscious discovery, that is perfect for nooetic quantum woo woo theory, very prescient.
    In anti-oedipus they say that capitalism society couldn't handle even one living desire so instead of oedipedializing desire and forcing it to traverse the void of castration we should recognize that it produces the real and push it past the limit, or something I don't know, I dont care, to say anything too smart or even for grammar, thanks again this is really helping me out for understanding anti-oedipus and some mysterious secret stuff

  • @surelygettingthere
    @surelygettingthere หลายเดือนก่อน

    This probably gave me the new vocabulary to expand on my past attempts in explaining what it is exactly that is happening to me. Such luck to find this lecture. Thank you!

  • @joseestrada395
    @joseestrada395 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Please continue to make content, this is very good quality material

  • @raw_dah
    @raw_dah 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Your lectures are very very helpful. Words can not encapsulte my feelings gratefulness for your work. Thank you.

  • @satyasyasatyasya5746
    @satyasyasatyasya5746 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    "Any mental analysis of the self without a material analysis of the world in which one lives, is nothing but solipsistic wankery"

    • @ir0n2541
      @ir0n2541 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      "Wankery"... i'm going try to use this word today at some point.

    • @satyasyasatyasya5746
      @satyasyasatyasya5746 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ir0n2541 haha you're welcome :D

    • @EMC2Scotia
      @EMC2Scotia 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is this video in some ways saying this is impossible?

    • @havadatequila
      @havadatequila 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      True, but you can't do much about material conditions. Adaptation occurs in the individual.

    • @satyasyasatyasya5746
      @satyasyasatyasya5746 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@havadatequila one cannot adapt to fire

  • @scriptea
    @scriptea 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is a fantastic series. Love the concept of subjective destitution. Recently wrote "There is a nonbeing of the I that thinks," which mirrors the "I think where I am not" statement of 21:22. Gonna use it as a lens to go through (again) Derrida's Margins of Philosophy.

  • @TheBlapo
    @TheBlapo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for this video and for your work. Greetings from Slovenia

  • @carlosdelclos
    @carlosdelclos 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That was really good, man. Thanks!

  • @kolmol9097
    @kolmol9097 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Did psychoanalysis take Michel Foucault's criticisms seriously? Does psychoanalysis deny the influence of the environment, surroundings, and society? Is a person's personality affected by experiences after childhood? Such as adolescence and youth

  • @CaptainBaat
    @CaptainBaat 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing lecture, thank you for all of this

  • @nightoftheworld
    @nightoftheworld 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    30:01 *Zizek’s materialism* “If we were to collectively reframe, as it were, our fantasmatic frame then reality itself would change.
    Hence, we are not the passive agents of a cruel reality and we have to flee into fantasy-it is that we are the active agents of fantasy and therein we can change reality.”

  • @maryreilly5102
    @maryreilly5102 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    When are you going to interview zizek Julian?? its due!!!

    • @nabeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaal
      @nabeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaal 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It’s like the Talmud interviewing the Torah. Simcha!

    • @maryreilly5102
      @maryreilly5102 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@nabeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaal regular people interview him all the time in youtube!

  • @sina8883
    @sina8883 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sheesh- The mental acrobatics you have to go through to obtain a sense of inner peace in the modern world….🙄

  • @DrSolimanMD
    @DrSolimanMD 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Good afternoon Jolian. Engaging as always. The Zizekian definition of the goal of psychoanalysis is intriguing as it combines theories across time. Per Freud's theories, the goal of psychoanalysis is to "bring unconscious material in mind into conscious awareness." I believe the attachment theories emerged later, around Lacan's time. I would love to know your perspective regarding connecting the being and becoming concepts to the perspective shared in this lecture? I can "small" a connection but I can't place my fingers on it if you know what I mean.

    • @Kingofcrocs1
      @Kingofcrocs1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Attachment theories is partly what Lacan in some ways went against in his theories

  • @romerobjuancarlos
    @romerobjuancarlos 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cheers! Has there been a change in the way audio is recorded? It sounds so much better. I'd been struggling a little bit for like a month or so. Thank you so much for what you do, Julian! Big hug.

  • @whowereweagain
    @whowereweagain 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I read deleuze and guattari and they tell me I should be proud not to understand the psychoanalysis they are talking about in antioedipus, but here I am so I know and I thank you for the content to help me see what they were responding to.
    should the point not be to produce a happy and joyous subject? This destitution stuff sounds bad.

  • @whowereweagain
    @whowereweagain 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    (post)structuralists have a lot to say about simulation and stuff and I have experimented with that very intensely, so I definitely know what they are talking about, besides their nonsensical semiology.Idk I think the Peirceian takes on iconicity and symbols and anti-nominalism is probs better for understanding that. Like Frederick Sterjnfelt talks about in diagrammotology. also, I like a thousand plateaus, that's a good book.

  • @muditha-Asanga-Hewage
    @muditha-Asanga-Hewage 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why did you tell that ticklish subject is more important than sublime object of idealogy?

  • @haopowei
    @haopowei 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sorry , I just want to clarify. Are ultimate fantasy and fundamental fantasy the same thing?

  • @candycane106
    @candycane106 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾 I wonder what you’d say about the movie I Saw the TV Glow

  • @michaelyoon9355
    @michaelyoon9355 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Achieve the ego ideal.

  • @erdwaenor
    @erdwaenor 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    *FAZEDORES DE BAÚS*
    Seguramente, não fez todas as Pérolas originais.
    Ainda assim, confeccionou um Baú para então as Amostrar.
    _Epistemic Gnomes_

  • @zatoichiMiyamoto
    @zatoichiMiyamoto 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I thought about another movie, "Being John Malkovich"

  • @tovialbores-falk3091
    @tovialbores-falk3091 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is the evidence for any of this?

  • @TheWay-u1n
    @TheWay-u1n 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You want to place the fantasy of hope at the center of your frame..
    Fishing..
    fisherman gather in liminal spaces discussing the frames and baits

    • @TheWay-u1n
      @TheWay-u1n 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Children free of parental guidance escape the frame..
      Lucifer unbound as the antichrist

    • @satyasyasatyasya5746
      @satyasyasatyasya5746 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      i really hope you outgrow the edgelord stuff someday :)

    • @TheWay-u1n
      @TheWay-u1n 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@satyasyasatyasya5746
      I am what everyone else wants to be..
      On point

    • @satyasyasatyasya5746
      @satyasyasatyasya5746 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@TheWay-u1n oh its like a real life anime villain :P

  • @chrisrichardson8988
    @chrisrichardson8988 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    All these Western jargony philosophies are watered down Buddhism.