Hey, guys if it's of any value. I'd like to point out that Equation (3.9) in lecture note 10, should be (h^2) in the denominator as it is k^2 = (2mE)/(h) right now.
@@islam13ish The best introductory ones I've seen are by Tobias Osborne. At least, that's what I've used. Then you pretty much just try to read through some of the standard QFT books like Peskin/Schwartz to fill in the details.
Hey, guys if it's of any value. I'd like to point out that Equation (3.9) in lecture note 10, should be (h^2) in the denominator as it is k^2 = (2mE)/(h) right now.
Why assuming no potential??
Es una partícula que se mueve libremente en el círculo, sin la presencia de campos u otras fuentes externas. Por eso el potencial el 0
Why only the positive exponential and not a sum Aexp(ikx)+Bexp(-ikx)>
He took k in Z so you have the positive and negative solutions. The idea is to find the basis. You will see why in next lecture
Exp(ikt) with k negative and positive, span the same space as vect(exp(ikt)) + vect(exp(-ikt))
@@cafe-tomate can you please elaborate it a bit more?
Does it mean they are Linearlly dependent..
e^ikx and e^-ikx?
Absolutely well done and definitely keep it up!!! 👍👍👍👍👍
Clean the audio ! It's barely audible. Too much background noise
Cramming for PHYS 137A at UCB >: ^ ). Thanks MIT.
Same thing for me at UCLA, Quantum II (115B)
Hey you were watching also fred schuller course
@@datsmydab-minecraft-and-mo5666 yeppp
Do you guys have any good QFT lectures? on youtube or elsewhere
@@islam13ish The best introductory ones I've seen are by Tobias Osborne. At least, that's what I've used. Then you pretty much just try to read through some of the standard QFT books like Peskin/Schwartz to fill in the details.
U simplified QUANTUM PHYSICS. U GREAT