One small correction -@0.47 - Sun is biggest in the universe. -- Sun is biggest star in our solar system. There are bigger stars in the universe than Sun.
First part of the hypotesys(not the theory) is true, but the second half is wrong. Here is why. 1) Sun in not the bigest star, obviously. 2) Sun and other stars are relatively not much older than their planets. 3) I am sure, that elements heavier than Iron(26 protons)are not emitted from the Sun, because nuclear fusion stops on Iron. It is the most stable element. Not a coincident it is so abundant on earth, altrough it is relatively heavy. The nebulla consisted this element before the formation of the Sun. They are product of a Super Nova 4) I am also almost sure, that even the lighter elements on earth were never part of the Sun. They are also product of a Super Nova. Because after fusion inside the star the heaviest elements go to the center, they are not emited. They form layers. From outside to the inside H(1), He(2),..C(6).. 0(8).. Na(11), Mg(12) ...... Fe(26). Until too much iron is accumulated in the core. Then somehow even Iron can't resist the tension it fuses. The star bursts(Super Nova) and form nebulas. Which already consist all of the elemnts of the planet's.
BS prove one word...you cant...oh wait i take it back..my golf ball is orbiting my basketball and im sorry about the mess all these damn photons flying out of my phone...deceived or deceiving?
🎯 Key points for quick navigation: 00:00 *🌌 Nebular Hypothesis Overview* - Introduction to early Earth origin theories, focusing on the nebular hypothesis, - Emanuel Kant and Laplace's contributions to the theory, - Key concept: the formation of planets and stars from a nebular cloud. 00:28 *🌠 Formation of the Sun and Stars* - Stars formed before planets, with the Sun emerging as the largest star, - Initial nebula composed of hydrogen and helium leading to star formation, - Fusion reactions creating pure energy at the center formed the Sun. 01:22 *🪐 Planetary Formation* - Lighter elements moved to the center, forming the Sun; heavier elements formed planets, - Denser elements like carbon and silicon moving outward initiated planet formation, - Accretion process led to planets being formed layer by layer from clumped heavier elements. Made with HARPA AI
Sooo cool!! I literally wasted three days in understanding the nebular hypothesis... You just made it that simple and explained it in two minutes thank you so much.... Please keep posting!!
Sir, I have got a few questions from this video. It'd mean a lot if you could clear my queries. 1. @0:58: "The cloud started rotating very heavily." What was the force that shaped the clouds to rotate? 2. Sir, was this cloud rotating in any specific direction? 3. How far is this hypothesis accepted within the scientific community? Thank you so much, Sir, for such informative videos.
There is drawback in this hypothesis that is outermost planets are in gaeous state that means these planets have less density than inner most planets.So according to this theory heavier planets are away from the sun but we have lighter elements away from from
Whaaaaaat????? 0:47 "The sun is the biggest star in the universe" This clearly is a medieval view of the universe. I never thought that I would hear these hypothesis in our time.
Great way of breaking down the concept. Fab job sir. It looks like child's game which otherwise needs a lot of imagination to understand while reading. You are doing actually what you claim- " Breaking them down for easy digestion" :-)
Moreover He comprehended in His design the sky, and it had been (as) smoke: He said to it and to the earth: "Come ye together, willingly or unwillingly." They said: "We do come (together), in willing obedience." (Fussilat 41:11)
Vivek Pachouri's Comment : NEBULA HYPOTHESIS WAS STATED IN 1734 AND VY CANIS MAJORIS WAS DISCOVERED IN 1801.. SO THE AT THAT TIME ONLY SUN WAS THE LARGEST STAR
I really appreciate your efforts...cz u r the one ..i found on TH-cam channel which is purely in English....this is what actually cbse students want 😅😅
Sir...early while formation of sun you told that the heavy matter moves away and ligher ones including H & He forms the sun....and in later theory of planet you told heavy matter sinks towards core and lighter ones moves away.... When the matter and process is same how the methodology differs ?
@@lucky-rx6qi no one recognised ! Just a hypothesis ..... An assumption ! 🤦 Don't change the meaning of hypothesis by just saying no one recognised ! Even I know that ! 😒 Ok ok...let it be ! ... I can't just argue with someone like this ! Try thinking in different perspective
Hello sir your videos are just woww.. I plz request you to cover some of the things from gc Leong too. And other upsc syllabus of geography.. Thanks for your efforts sir
At that time they considered sun as bigger star because they were not aware of other bigger stars other than sun...At earlier times many of the facts known to us nowadays are not explored by the philosophers and scientists lived at those time.
Biggest known star in the universe is VY Canis Majoris, and also other stars like UY scuti are much bigger than the sun. The sun definitely isn't the biggest star in the universe, not even close!
One small correction -@0.47 - Sun is biggest in the universe. -- Sun is biggest star in our solar system. There are bigger stars in the universe than Sun.
But that was acc. to theory
@0.47 - sun
U Y Scuti is the biggest star in universe
He told correctly that sun is the biggest STAR in the universe . Pls replay the video @ 0.47
I'm the biggest star in mine universe 😂😂
Master ji kamaal kr diya apne.. Thanks alot and God bless you....
you have made geography so simple. very nice explanations and your voice makes it more concentrating
Pay some respect by Saying "Sir" 🙄
@@OnlyCAPF did you get into the army yet?
First part of the hypotesys(not the theory) is true, but the second half is wrong. Here is why.
1) Sun in not the bigest star, obviously.
2) Sun and other stars are relatively not much older than their planets.
3) I am sure, that elements heavier than Iron(26 protons)are not emitted from the Sun, because nuclear fusion stops on Iron. It is the most stable element. Not a coincident it is so abundant on earth, altrough it is relatively heavy. The nebulla consisted this element before the formation of the Sun. They are product of a Super Nova
4) I am also almost sure, that even the lighter elements on earth were never part of the Sun. They are also product of a Super Nova. Because after fusion inside the star the heaviest elements go to the center, they are not emited. They form layers. From outside to the inside H(1), He(2),..C(6).. 0(8).. Na(11), Mg(12) ...... Fe(26). Until too much iron is accumulated in the core. Then somehow even Iron can't resist the tension it fuses. The star bursts(Super Nova) and form nebulas. Which already consist all of the elemnts of the planet's.
BS prove one word...you cant...oh wait i take it back..my golf ball is orbiting my basketball and im sorry about the mess all these damn photons flying out of my phone...deceived or deceiving?
absolutely
They are also somewhere around 4 bl yrs old
Sir could please tell us is this theory is same as gaseous hypothesis of British physist Kelvin
NEBULA HYPOTHESIS WAS STATED IN 1734 AND VY CANIS MAJORIS WAS DISCOVERED IN 1801.. SO THE AT THAT TIME ONLY SUN WAS THE LARGEST STAR
🎯 Key points for quick navigation:
00:00 *🌌 Nebular Hypothesis Overview*
- Introduction to early Earth origin theories, focusing on the nebular hypothesis,
- Emanuel Kant and Laplace's contributions to the theory,
- Key concept: the formation of planets and stars from a nebular cloud.
00:28 *🌠 Formation of the Sun and Stars*
- Stars formed before planets, with the Sun emerging as the largest star,
- Initial nebula composed of hydrogen and helium leading to star formation,
- Fusion reactions creating pure energy at the center formed the Sun.
01:22 *🪐 Planetary Formation*
- Lighter elements moved to the center, forming the Sun; heavier elements formed planets,
- Denser elements like carbon and silicon moving outward initiated planet formation,
- Accretion process led to planets being formed layer by layer from clumped heavier elements.
Made with HARPA AI
Thank you so much, sir! This will really help for my earth science test 2 days from now.
Thank you so much Sir. Makes NCERT so easy.
u had made some general mistakes in your videos
it could be drastic for me
but other than this its good & time saving for me.
Deepak singh which mistake sir done
@@vaibhavkorde4711 sun is not the biggest star.
@@Kevin-sy9xv LOL BRO THAT HYPOSTHESIS SAID THAT.DONT BE TOO OVERSMART
Sooo cool!! I literally wasted three days in understanding the nebular hypothesis... You just made it that simple and explained it in two minutes thank you so much.... Please keep posting!!
Sir, I have got a few questions from this video. It'd mean a lot if you could clear my queries.
1. @0:58: "The cloud started rotating very heavily." What was the force that shaped the clouds to rotate?
2. Sir, was this cloud rotating in any specific direction?
3. How far is this hypothesis accepted within the scientific community?
Thank you so much, Sir, for such informative videos.
It was the 'Centripetal force' in which objects revolve along the curved path which is directed towards the center..
There is drawback in this hypothesis that is outermost planets are in gaeous state that means these planets have less density than inner most planets.So according to this theory heavier planets are away from the sun but we have lighter elements away from from
@@Agnostic7773 nice doubt
I'm amazed that this is so easy
wow wow champ man ..............proficient control on language and best NCERT explanation....keep on making videos hats off you sir
It's the very easy way to get understand.. Thanks 4 marking this type of video
Whaaaaaat????? 0:47 "The sun is the biggest star in the universe"
This clearly is a medieval view of the universe.
I never thought that I would hear these hypothesis in our time.
Great way of breaking down the concept. Fab job sir. It looks like child's game which otherwise needs a lot of imagination to understand while reading.
You are doing actually what you claim- " Breaking them down for easy digestion" :-)
If possible do start MCQ series also for various subjects. It'll help to re-calibrate/ re-validate the assimilation of the concepts.
Best explanation of nebular hypothesis👍👍👍❤️❤️
better than those xyz tutorials. thanx. best part abt the channel is that u keep everything simple. n hence understood-able.
Beautifully presented, thanks.
Moreover He comprehended in His design the sky, and it had been (as) smoke: He said to it and to the earth: "Come ye together, willingly or unwillingly." They said: "We do come (together), in willing obedience."
(Fussilat 41:11)
Really helpful, thanks a lot.
YO A BLEACH FAN STUDYING GEO JUST LIKE ME MAN
Hats off to u sir..u make dis very easy to understand....
Sun is the biggest star....
UY Scuti : Am I a joke to you?
😂😂thts what I was thinking
I can't trust sun is the biggest Star in the whole universe
he also said remember that 😂😂😂
UY scuti itself isn't the biggest star
Vivek Pachouri's Comment : NEBULA HYPOTHESIS WAS STATED IN 1734 AND VY CANIS MAJORIS WAS DISCOVERED IN 1801.. SO THE AT THAT TIME ONLY SUN WAS THE LARGEST STAR
very useful and clear understanding of the concept tku sir
sir UY-SCUTI(BD 125055) is the bigest star in observable universe
I thing here Sir were just explaining the theory according to which sun is biggest star of the universe.
Heartfelt blessings To you 🥺🥺✨✨
simplest and also most powerful explanation.. thank you sir.. like from 2020
You rocked sir 😭 Easiest way I have ever understand 🫀✨ Allah bless you Sir ❣️
Thank you Rajesh koothrapali
Wowsome, thanks❤
God bless you sir 🙏🏻🙏🏻☺️
Best explanation of Nebular Hypothesis.
I really appreciate your efforts...cz u r the one ..i found on TH-cam channel which is purely in English....this is what actually cbse students want 😅😅
Amazing ...u made it so simple
Wow.... simply wow 😍
Explanations are understandable.But some real factors are missing in this video. otherwise it's good. And your way of explanation are Understandable .
You are a great teacher
0:46 sir, sun is the biggest star in solar system not in universe
Scientists also didn't know the biggest star in universe
0:45 UY Scuti is approximately 1,700 times larger than the sun in radius.
Thanks for the update
Marvellous explanation. ....
1:13, Ring Nebula instead of Sun.
Sir...early while formation of sun you told that the heavy matter moves away and ligher ones including H & He forms the sun....and in later theory of planet you told heavy matter sinks towards core and lighter ones moves away.... When the matter and process is same how the methodology differs ?
My doubt too
Exactly... This was my doubt!!
Very interesting I always thought I was born from a nebula😬😬😀...thanks for your information...
Sir excellent video but the largest star of the universe is UY Scuti not Sun...👍👍👍👍👍
you speak so well...
thanks rashmi :)
Amit Sengupta men will be men lol..
I wish I had this video two weeks ago when I was doing a test on this
I love ur voice ... It's hard to concentrate on concepts in this voice ☠️🥺
it's confusing how lighter comes inside and heavier thrown away outside pls explain me
Yes bro....
its because of thier difference in densities
lighter body ex. lithosphere come outside
havier one like core moves or remain inside
Go for John d winter book of petrology chapter 1 , well explained there.🙏
@@gauravwatchyoutube I think you also committed a mistake.You explained about planets only.what about star?
its easier when u understand centrifugal force
Hey. Great explanation. But please, correct that " Sun is the biggest star in the universe ". It is not.
yeah
@@lucky-rx6qi no one recognised ! Just a hypothesis ..... An assumption ! 🤦
Don't change the meaning of hypothesis by just saying no one recognised !
Even I know that ! 😒 Ok ok...let it be ! ... I can't just argue with someone like this ! Try thinking in different perspective
its nice...thanks... but a mistake in this video.... u said 'sun is the biggest star in the universe'...
Hello sir your videos are just woww.. I plz request you to cover some of the things from gc Leong too. And other upsc syllabus of geography.. Thanks for your efforts sir
Sir please make videos on previous years Prelim. mcq (upsc) as well as give us some tips (guideline) on Mains answer writing. Please Sir
Concept of Fusion in stars was known after 1920-- in 1939, paper was released regarding fusion in stars. Kant and Laplace existed way before 1920's.
very good explanation ......keep it up👍👍
sir ur ncert serious was really awesome ty so much fr the vedio
Thank u so much sir finally your video help me lot to understand about NEBULA THEORY
I m going to watch your all videos
Sir your writing not visible clearly can your please change the writing style to get better visibility sir.. The explaination is awesome. .thanku
so clear and easy explanation
Thanks U sir U made my day
Awesome way to explain
sir very very nice explanations. thanks
Eloquent speaker....sooo articulate. Hats off to teaching skills 👍. 👍 × 1000
💕Thx sir u r great 💕
🙏💖God bless u💖🙏👍👍
Clean and crisp info !! Superb ..
बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद सर जी
Great one sir👍
Nice explain ....
great video but the sun is not the biggest star its Vy Canis Majoris
now it is UY Scuti.....
dharmesh soneji this theory was made in 1796 by Laplace a French mathematician
At that time they considered sun as bigger star because they were not aware of other bigger stars other than sun...At earlier times many of the facts known to us nowadays are not explored by the philosophers and scientists lived at those time.
It is according to the theory
What about density of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune.. Khopstar
sir it is doubtful
whether sun is largest star or nearest to our planets
as we have read in foundation classes it is mentioned to be nearest
Biggest Star nearest to our Planet.
Chemistry reduced to heavy & light elements. Nice!
Biggest known star in the universe is VY Canis Majoris, and also other stars like UY scuti are much bigger than the sun. The sun definitely isn't the biggest star in the universe, not even close!
good explination...thnx
really brief and accurate. thank you sir!
Sir your explanation is the best I've heard so far.ty
Thank you sir ❤️
Bhut accha samjhaya
Nicely done
Thanks a lot sir❤️
👍it will help me tommorow
0:46 Sun is not the biggest star 🌟 in the universe, it is the biggest star in Milky way galaxy 🌌.
Not that either. The pistol star is the largest star in the milky way. Our sun is tiny compared to most giant stars in the universe
Thank you soo much sir !
Please make video on planetesimal theory ....
It helpss...tqq sir
good clearity info....
Great video
Great video!!!
Sir will you please help me with WHAT IS EXTRA TERRESTRIAL PROCESS ??? IN GEOMORPHOLOGY PLZ EXPLAIN IT SIR
AWESOME !! KEEP IT UP!
Best video sir
so, where did the nebular appear? How did the particles that it was made of appear??
The real question is how did the initial helium nebula occur?
Thank you very much sir
Beautifully explained sir 🙏
Thanks a lot sir..
Sir ,please make videos on GC leong .
Nicely explained thanks 👍👍
Thanku sir,💞💞💞
Jai Hind 🇮🇳
at @0:57 Is Sun really the biggest star in Universe?
Acc to theory