Christians React to Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is mentioned in Bible (Shocking Truth) | Ahmed Deedat
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 พ.ค. 2024
- Welcome back to Spice Paradise! Continuing our Ramadan special series! Thank you for all the love and support!
Welcome back to Spice Paradise!
Make sure to Like & Subscribe!
Original Video:
• [Shocking Truth]- Prop...
Follow us!
TikTok: / ispiceparadise
Instagram : / thespiceparadise
Twitter: / ispiceparadise
Email: thehypeconvo@gmail.com
Timeline:
0:00 Intro
0:30 React
12:35 Discussion
Keywords:
#Bible #Prophet #islam
#ramadan
#RationalBeliever
#Bible
Prophet Muhammad -The greatest man in history
Ahmad deedat
Muhammadim
old testament
New testament
Sheikh Khalid Yasin
Who was Muhammad (PBUH)
100 most influential people in history
Jesus Christ
George Bernard Shaw
#Prophet Muhammad
Prophet of Islam
Messenger of Allah
Mercy to mankind
#quranmiracles
#quran
#islammiracles
#reaction
#quran
#islamicvideo
#islamic
#quranfacts
#ramadan - บันเทิง
Watch us talk about Ramadan here!
th-cam.com/video/w-neAKtXB3o/w-d-xo.html
Hey guys, in 14:00 you were talking about translating a name. But I ensure you, the classic Hebrew מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is not even a name, but it is a masculine plural noun. Just inform every high valuated classic Hebrew dictionary or lexicon. And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to the name of 'Muhammad'.
And when you read John 14-16 in context, then it will become clear that the Paracletos (translated as Comforter or Helper) does not fit Muhammad at all. First of all, in John 14-16 Jesus Christ was speaking to His disciples.
But Muhammad was not with the disciples (John 14:17).
And Muhammad was not in the disciples after Jesus Christ's ascension (John 14:17).
Muhammad was not sent in Jesus' name (John 14:26).
Muhammad was not the Holy Spirit (John 14:26).
Muhammad did not teach the disciples (John 14:26).
Muhammad did not remember the disciples everything what Jesus Christ has said to them (John14:26).
Muhammad is not sent by Jesus Christ (John 15:26 and 16:7).
Muhammad did not testify about Jesus Christ to the disciples (John 15:26).
Muhammad did not guide the disciples in all truth (John 16:13).
Muhammad did not disclose it to the disciples (John 16:13).
Muhammad did not glorify Jesus Christ (John 16:14).
Muhammad did not become his 'revelation' from Jesus Christ (John 16:14 and 16:15).
So the Paracletos is definitely not Muhammad.
@@reneandjohn *_John 14:16 does not speak only to the disciples_*
*_It speaks about the whole humanity_*
*_The comforter, Prophet Muhammad (Sal) is a human being who is sent for whole humanity_*
*We have sent you ˹O Prophet˺ only as a mercy for the whole world.*
(Holy Quran - 21:107)
@@jesusisfalsegodfalsesaviou9114 Stop ly!ng. In John 14-16 Jesus Christ was speaking to His present disciples:
“But when the Helper comes, whom I will to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness about me. And you also will bear witness, because YOU have been WITH ME FROM THE BEGINNING.” John 15:26-27
Jesus said to him, “Have I been WITH YOU so long, and you still do not know me, Philip? Whoever has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’?” John 14:9
“But I HAVE SAID these things TO YOU, that when their hour comes you may remember that I told them to you. “I did not say these things to you from the BEGINNING, because I WAS WITH YOU.”
John 16:4
@@jesusisfalsegodfalsesaviou9114 Stop ly!ng. Jesus Christ was speaking to His disciples:
“But when the Helper comes, whom I will to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness about me. And you also will bear witness, because YOU have been WITH ME FROM THE BEGINNING.” John 15:26-27
May Allah guidance be with you guys Ameen much love to you guys from Gambia waste Africa
Much love from Canada!
Muhammad copied books of Bible and made Quran.
He married many to help them.
He killed many as they were bad.
So he added polygamy and jihad and made Quran.
You will get many women on earth and in heaven.
Beware in the last days many logical men will make many to fall.
Pray nonstop till you know God
Jesus is the only way ,truth and life.
@@SpiceParadise Hey guys, in 14:00 you were talking about translating a name. But I ensure you, the classic Hebrew מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is not even a name, but it is a masculine plural noun. Just inform every high valuated classic Hebrew dictionary or lexicon. And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to the name of 'Muhammad'.
Three silly young boys becoming more foolish and very stupid trying to embrace a violent and demonic religion called islam
@@reneandjohn *Prophet Jesus’ mission is limited to the banu Israelis*
*Prophet Jesus’ mission was over*
*Prophet Jesus’ disciples are banu Israelis*
*Prophet Jesus advised them to follow his Comforter, Prophet Muhammad (Sal) who is yet to come after Prophet Jesus*
*That is why, Jesus says he will ask God to send ANOTHER COMFORTER who will abide with you forever*
(John 14:16)
*Jesus’ Comforter is not a holy spirit*
*Holy spirit was there with Jesus & his disciples*
*ANOTHER COMFORTER is a human being who is Prophet Muhammad (Sal)*
this passage was shown to many rabai who speak Hebrew for all their life and they stayed amazed with no comeback but the Christians as always fighting in subjects that they do not know none of!
There is not one rabbi who pronounces מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as 'muhammadim'. Maybe you've seen a guy disguised as a rabbi in the video. That guy 'rabbi' Mort is exposed as a deceiver, he is no rabbi. He is pretending to be a rabbi but he is no. Real Jews and rabbis like rabbi Elhanan Miller has shown he is no rabbi. Quotation by rabbi Elhanan Miller:
“No Jew would believe this guy as a Jew or rabbi.”. And Arabic native speaking people has discovered ‘rabbi’ Mort as an Iranian speaking Muslim. So said that islamic apologists disguise themselves to fool their own people.
‘Rabbi’ Mort also don't know Hebrew. He claimed that 'muhammadin' is found in Songs of Solomon. But he is wong, מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is pronounced as ‘ma-kha-madim’. Just check every high valuated Hebrew dictionary or lexicon. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad.
The other deception made by 'rabbi' Mort is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again he is wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is an masculine plural noun, so it is not a name (like יְהוִֹה, Yhvh). Again check every high valuated Hebrew dictionary or lexicon. And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to the name of ‘Muhammad’. So please, don't let yourself be deluded by an ignorant islamic apologist who disguised themselves as a rabbi. Soooo sad.
@@reneandjohnlmao so it's Makhamdim. So different it's crazy. Hebrew doesnt have the arabic "ha" so that's who it's kh. Your argument falls apart 😂 the lack of integrity is hilarious
@@abdallayoussef3129 Hebrew scholars apply high valuated Hebrew dictionaries and lexicons for analysing the Tanakh. Like the Brown Driver Briggs Hebrew and English / BDB, HALOT, DCH and Jastrow, etc.
And they are very clear about the Hebrew מַחְמַד:
Noun masculine
Meaning: desire, desirable thing
Pronounce: makh-mawd
So there is no pronunciation of 'muhammad'. And it is clearly a masculine NOUN. So it is NOT a name. So it is IMPOSSIBLE that it refers to the name of 'Muhammad'.
@abdallayoussef3129 But if you stubbornly, against all evidence, still hold on that it still means 'muhammad' then tell me, is Muhammad also mentioned in the other verses in which the same word appaers?
For example, Isaiah 64:11 mourns the destruction of Jerusalem: “Our holy and beautiful temple, where our fathers praised You, is burned up with fire; and all our pleasant things are laid waste.” “Pleasant things” is a form of the same word in Song of Solomon 5:16. Would the Islamic ‘scholars' contend that Muhammad was “laid waste” in Jerusalem?
Additional occurrences of the same word are seen in 1 Kings 20:6; 2 Chronicles 36:19; Lamentations 1:10,11; Ezekiel 24:16,21,25; Hosea 9:9,16; Joel 3:5. Is in this verses also Muhammad mentioned?
If yes, why? If not, why not?
@@reneandjohn *do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God; for many false prophets have gone out into the world.*
(1 John 4:1)
*Your bible clearly calls spirits are Prophets*
*Spirits of truth are Prophets, according to bible*
*John 16:13 clearly proves that the spirit of truth is Prophet Muhammad (Sal)*
But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all the truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come. (John 16:13)
👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
_When the spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth_
*This speaks about the coming of Prophet Muhammad (Sal) who will guide people into the truth*
_He will not speak on his own_
*Of course!*
*Prophet Muhammad (Sal) will not preach on his own*
*Prophet Muhammad (Sal) will preach people through the revelation from God Almighty Allah*
_He will speak what he hears_
*Prophet Muhammad (Sal) will speak what he hears from God Almighty Allah*
_He will tell you what is yet to come_
*This speaks about Prophet Muhammad (Sal)’s Prophecies*
*So, John 16:13 clearly proves Jesus’ Comforter is a human being who is Prophet Muhammad (Sal)*
WORDS COULD BE WRONG IN TRANSLATIONS.
BUT what he was saying IT WAS A "NAME" so there was an intention to change it so people dont find out he was mentioned BY NAME.
Mind blowing
Its no mind blowing Muhammed name was not in the Bible, deedat was lying to you guys
@@Trothoflife lmao your lying to yourself buddy. go read it yourself its simple to logically understand what he said and to see it yourself. ik its ok the truth hurts you won't die
@Yaser624 If you guys are not dumb and read your own quran instead of listening to the like of deedat and your dawah gang, maybe you'll be able to actually apply a logical sense on silly issues like this
Many places in your book, quran 16.101, 25.4-5 to quote but few, we read how people were mocking Muhammed calling him crazy, liar and so on. Don't you think if what deedat claimed were true, Gabriel, or allah wouldn't have told Muhammed those verses to prove to the Jews then.
But according to you, allah nor Gabriel knew such existed until 1400 years after when deedat is now coming to rescue your allah and Gabriel right.
You guys boost of logical thinking, It seems you dont know how to apply such when required
@@Trothoflife
But I took the word from the original and translated it he was right so is Google translation with Ahmad or what?!? Does the translation lie
@Jojo It's beyond delusion, answer my previous question: Does that mean that deedat know more than allah, gabriel and mohammed how come when people were mocking Muhammed allah didn't tell him to show them those verses from the bible to prove to them.
Muhammed is not anywhere in the Bible, deedat, zirk nikr are all been lying to you guess. Do they know more than your allah? What loads of bullocks tell me what you put into Google translation that claimed Muhammed is in the Bible.
My dad in his time read an old Jewish scripture and there was a page at the end prophesying Muhammad pbuh, it got removed.
Lol, and your dad was able to find that out right. And yet your mere logical quran many aspect were unknown by your scholars, but the very book that makes your prophet an ummi was known by your dad 🤦
What are you talking about we know every single person mentioned in the quran and there's only one author is allah not like your bible 4554565231 person and wrote it after jesus 200 years what are you talking about man?? read the quran then speak @@Trothoflife
Nice video ❤thanks dears
I am your 800th sub
You do not translate a person's name, if your name is Trevor then it remains as Trevor no matter where you go in the world or what language you speak.
The classic Hebrew, מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים, ma-kha-madim, is NOT a name, but it is a masculine plural noun. Just check every high valuated Hebrew dictionary or lexicon. And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to the name of 'muhamnad'. Please, don't let yourself be deluded by lying layman in classic Hebrew like Deedat and Naik.
So why is it Allah and not YHWH as God revealed himself to Moses?
@@TatyanaKoshask Arab Christian
@@reneandjohn😂 why in english translated as altogether lovely
@@raiden0801 Because this noun means 'altogether lovely'. Just check every high valuated Hebrew dictionary or lexicon.
awesome bro ❤️🔥🥹👼
Prophet Mohammed PBUH is mentioned in almost every holy scripture. Let's go to the oldest religion (Hinduism ) this is the first religion basically and it stats According to Bhavishya Purana in the Prati Sarag Parv Ill Khand 3 Adhay 3 Shloka 5 to 8.
"A malecha (belonging to a foreign country and speaking a foreign language) spiritual teacher will appear with his companions. His name will be Mohammad. (Bhoj after giving this Maha Dev Arab (of angelic disposition) a bath in the Panchgavya and the Ganga water (i.e. purifying him of all sins) offered him the present of his sincere devotion and showing him all reverence said, "I make obeisance to thee. O ye! The pride of mankind, the dweller in Arabia Mantral
He is Narashansah or the praised one (Muhammad).
He is Kaurama: the prince of peace or the emigrant, who is safe, even amongst a host of 60,090 enemies.
Mantra2
He is a camel-riding Rishi, whose chariot touches the heaven..
A similar prophecy is also found in Rigveda Book 1, Hymn 53 verse 9:The Sanskrit word used is Sushrama, which means praiseworthy or well praised which in Arabic means Muhammad (PBUH))
Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is also prophesised in the Samveda Book Il Hymn 6 verse 8:
Keep going
Truth is easy lies are difficult..
❤ O Allah, Lord of Jibraīl, Mīkaīl and Israfīl (great angels), Creator of the heavens and the Earth, Knower of the seen and the unseen. You are the arbitrator between Your servants in that which they have disputed. Guide me to the truth by Your leave, in that which they have differed, for verily You guide whom You will to a straight path."❤️
😍
Im is plural of respect...
It will be used with a noun
With person,so name
It will never be used for a verb
Sunan-an Nasa'i Sahih Hadith 3415 Aisah said,Muhammad hit her in the chest that hurt her.False teacher Deedat said the bible is corrupt but he is looking for muhammad in the bible.The comforter sent by Jesus is the Holy Spirit.If Jesus sent Muhammad it means Jesus is God.
Wrong. The verse explicitly states the spirit of truth will not speak of himself. If the holy spirit is god, why doesnt he speak of his own will? he needs permission as a god to speak?😂😂😂😂
React More video on, Ahmed deedat, and Dr zakir naik, 🙏🙏🥰🥰
Allah is the greatest
Salam Alaikum
I subscribed your chanel right now becouse your topic mohammad name mintioned in the bible?
If you disagree with my previous post then you’re well to deal with all the scripture verses well the mohamadim ie “all together lovely”is used in the scriptures regardless of negative statement in the biblical text.
Then do a search 🔍
16 For the other passages where machmad appears see 1 Kings 20:6; 2 Chr 36:19; Isa 64:10; Lam 1:7,10-11; 2:4; Ezek 24:16, 21, 25; Hos 9:6,16 and Joel 3:5.
You can’t have it both ways.
It’s dishonest to accept some and reject the rest that disagrees your interpretation of machmmad ie or machmmadim for the name of Mohammed.
And again there’s no such thing as a plural im of respect!
Indeed, the Prophet Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, is mentioned in the Bible, in the Hebrew language
That is false. Altogether lovely only refers to the Jews and Israelites and Gods relationship to them.
@@jerrygerardtetaiaharereroa1052 refer to Jesús no mahomed😊
exactly , Muslims twist everything.
If you think that's about Mohammed then in proper context you're calling Mohammed a woman
Lies lies.
Michael Brown too
1:35 it is maḥmāḏ not as he say muhamad-im. “maḥmāḏ” means lovely not Muhammad. It is talking about Christ which is coming in New Testament.
Interesting
The "im" was there. You cant delete it.
Prophet is mentioned in the Bible only once, its in Revelation 20:10 (google it)
1 John 2:22
Matthew 24:11
@SpiceParadice Hey guys, in 14:00 you were talking about translating a name. But I ensure you, the classic Hebrew מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is not even a name, but it is a masculine plural noun. Just inform every high valuated classic Hebrew dictionary or lexicon. And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to the name of 'Muhammad'.
even God translated in Hebrew as a plural noun ilaho'im you need to differentiate between the plural of respect and the plural of many
@@ibrahim2086 Niwhere in Songs of Solomon 5 it speaks about אֱלהִים, elohim, the masculine noun for a godhead. But Song of Solomon 5 speaks about ממתקים, mamtaqim and מחמדים, ma-kha-madim. So you can't compare apples with oranges.
Nevertheless, the classic Hebrew מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים, ma-kha-madim, is a masculine plural noun. So it is not a name. So every islamic apologist who speaks about מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as a name is a liar.
@@reneandjohn
you should go and look out in the first book of the Bible where it says "In the beginning God created the heaven and the Earth" the translation of God in the Hebrew version is Elohim. same im that représente the plural of glorification
@ibrahim2086 Sure in Genesis 1 it speaks about אֱלֹהִ֑ים ’ĕ-lō-hîm, a title of the Godhead. But we do not talk about אֱלֹהִ֑ים ’ĕ-lō-hîm, and we do not talk about Genesis. But we talk about מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים, ma-kha-madim, in Songs of Solomon. So don't compare apples with oranges.
@ibrahim2086 The claim that the plural 'im' (or 'eem') in ma-kha-madim in the Hebrew language was ‘added for respect’ is in this case false. First of all, nowhere in Songs of Solomon 5 it speaks about אֱלהִים, elohim, the masculine noun for a godhead. But Song of Solomon 5 speaks about ממתקים, mamtaqim and מחמדים, ma-kha-madim. So you can't compare apples with oranges. Biblical poetry is typically built on pairs of metaphors, for example "they were swifter than eagles, they were stronger than lions". In Song of Songs 5:16 it's "His mouth is most sweet, ממתקים, he is altogether lovely, מחמדים. So מחמדים, ma-kha-madim is equivalent to ממתקים, mamtaqim. So the addition ‘-im’ is just a superlative of ‘desire', so it means 'most desire'. Exactly in line with the other words in vers 16: ‘mamtaqim’ = most sweet and other places ‘partamim' = most noble.
When American Mr. Red , coming to Spain, then Spanish people calling him Mr. Roja.. LOL.
not only name of Prophet mohammad but also name of Mekka , 12 emams of eslam (mainly shia branch) and Coming of Mahdi ( the saviour) is also mentioned in torah and bible
And who is layman Deedat to make such a statement? Deedat was no scholar in classic Hebrew. Moreover he was not even officially educated at all. Never did Deedat refer to a Hebrew dictionary or scholar to prove his point.
The first mistake by Deedat is that he pronounced מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as ‘muhamaddim’. But he is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad. Just check every high valuated Hebrew dictionary or lexicon.
The other mistake made by Deedat is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים’ is a name. Again he is very wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name. Again, just check every high valuated Hebrew dictionary or lexicon. And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to the name of ‘Muhammad’.
Deedat only fooled his ignorant and gullible audience.
And also nowhere in the Jewish and Christian Scriptures is the name of 'mekka' mentioned. Please, don't let yourself be deluded by lying layman.
@@reneandjohn The name "Muhammad" is written in the Bible in the original Hebrew language.
In the 5th chapter of the Shir haShirim ( שיר השירים ), which is one of the five megilot or Sacred Scrolls that are part of the Hebrew Bible or for short the "Song of Solomon" (also called "Song of Songs"). That chapter is giving a prophecy about an individual to come, a mystery man.
Song of Songs 5:15 compares this prophetic mystery man to the land of "Lebanon" which is the land of the Arabs. This implies that the mystery man would be an Arab.
Verse 15 of the NIV Bible says: “His appearance is like Lebanon", so this is an Arabic gentleman (or Arab looking).
Verse 11 says: "his head is as the most fine gold, his locks are
wavy, and black as a raven". Verse 10 describes this man as being "radiant and ruddy" which means he was slightly light-skinned with a rosy color. This physical description matches exactly with the authentic Islamic sources.
Sahih Al Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 56, Number 747, says Muhammad was slightly light skinned, with a rosy color (and has the same hair as is mentioned in verse 11)
Song of Songs 5:10 says: "My beloved is white and ruddy, pre-eminent above ten thousand." This is a prophecy of Prophet Muhammad as he conquered Mecca. It is a well known historically documented fact that in the year 630 CE Muhammad entered Mecca as the leader of an army of "ten thousand men".
In reading the English translation of Song of Songs 5:16 it finishes the description by saying: "He is altogether lovely" but what most people don't know is that the name of that man was given in the original megilot. Here is the name written in ancient Hebrew as it appears in verse sixteen: מחמד . It is read as : "Mahammad".
Hebrew: חִכּוֹ, מַמְתַקִּים, וְכֻלּוֹ, מַחֲמַדִּים; זֶה דוֹדִי וְזֶה רֵעִי, בְּנוֹת יְרוּשָׁלִָם.
English: His mouth is most sweet; yea, he is ALTOGETHER LOVELY. This is my beloved, and this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem.
There is a plural used together with this Hebrew word, with
the plural it’s pronounced “Mahamadd-im”. The ending letters 'im' is a plural of respect, majesty and grandeur for God’s prophet, just as in the word Eloh-im.
According to Ben Yehuda's Hebrew-English Dictionary, it is correctly pronounced as "Mahammad".
If you don't believe me, go to these translator links, paste the name מחמד and then translate it into English. You will see that מחמד is translated as "Muhammad".*
In Hebrew there’s a plural usage of respect? Wait what ?
That Not True !
On that alone the argument or claim that the Arabian Warner is found in the bible is absurd and No true as well .
In fact I am not even trying to argue about his non Hebrew language accent
Simply stating the obvious.
Christianity dies without lies
Pinoy Brothers? May Allah guide you's to Islam, Islam has a rich history, And you can find that the dark complexion Filipinos are actually decent from The Indonesians who mixed with the Australian Aborigines and migrated to the Philippines around 16th-17th century
Hey guys, appreciate the effort, but if John 16:12-14 is talking about the prophet Muhammad, why does it say that "He" (Muhammad), shall glorify "me" (Jesus)?. Isn't that revealing Jesus to be greater than the prophet Muhammad?
Is this something you're okay to accept?
Jesus and Muhammad, peace be upon them, are just messengers of the King, Lord of the Worlds
Clearly, Jesus also glorify Muhammad. They respect and speak highly about each other. They are all prophets of the one true God.
When you read John 14-16 in context, then it will become clear that the Paracletos (translated as Comforter or Helper) does not fit Muhammad at all. First of all, in John 14-16 Jesus Christ was speaking to His disciples.
But Muhammad was not with the disciples (John 14:17).
And Muhammad was not in the disciples after Jesus Christ's ascension (John 14:17).
Muhammad was not sent in Jesus' name (John 14:26).
Muhammad was not the Holy Spirit (John 14:26).
Muhammad did not teach the disciples (John 14:26).
Muhammad did not remember the disciples everything what Jesus Christ has said to them (John14:26).
Muhammad is not sent by Jesus Christ (John 15:26 and 16:7).
Muhammad did not testify about Jesus Christ to the disciples (John 15:26).
Muhammad did not guide the disciples in all truth (John 16:13).
Muhammad did not disclose it to the disciples (John 16:13).
Muhammad did not glorify Jesus Christ (John 16:14).
Muhammad did not become his 'revelation' from Jesus Christ (John 16:14 and 16:15).
So the Paracletos is definitely not Muhammad.
100%, Amen 🙏🏼
Exactly but muslims will claim that Muhammad is the greatest of all the prophets
Bible says, Jesus is the only one god in the universe. God is real love. 🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹JESUS IS ALIVE 🕎 God bless you.
In Islam, a man can’t be saved until believing in Jesus.
So What?
Bible is corrupt and not devine book. It contradicts itself on several chapters
Bible is corrupt and not devine book. It contradicts itself on several chapters
No doubt whatsoever that Muhammad (PEACE BE UPON HIM). !
Is the final prophet.
The true miracle of Islam is that there are people who believe such nonsense.
Solomon’s wife was singing praises about her beloved man and how beautiful he is and then she breaks out into a song about Muhammad? And a word that only sounds kind of like his name, and does not actually say a name, nor does it say anything about a coming prophet😂
This is not a name. It is an adjective. An adjective describes a noun.
It is officially a masculine plural noun. But in context applied as an adjective. Nevertheless it is definitely not a name, so it has nothing to do with the name 'muhammad'.
@@reneandjohn The name "Muhammad" is written in the Bible in the original Hebrew language.
In the 5th chapter of the Shir haShirim ( שיר השירים ), which is one of the five megilot or Sacred Scrolls that are part of the Hebrew Bible or for short the "Song of Solomon" (also called "Song of Songs"). That chapter is giving a prophecy about an individual to come, a mystery man.
Song of Songs 5:15 compares this prophetic mystery man to the land of "Lebanon" which is the land of the Arabs. This implies that the mystery man would be an Arab.
Verse 15 of the NIV Bible says: “His appearance is like Lebanon", so this is an Arabic gentleman (or Arab looking).
Verse 11 says: "his head is as the most fine gold, his locks are
wavy, and black as a raven". Verse 10 describes this man as being "radiant and ruddy" which means he was slightly light-skinned with a rosy color. This physical description matches exactly with the authentic Islamic sources.
Sahih Al Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 56, Number 747, says Muhammad was slightly light skinned, with a rosy color (and has the same hair as is mentioned in verse 11)
Song of Songs 5:10 says: "My beloved is white and ruddy, pre-eminent above ten thousand." This is a prophecy of Prophet Muhammad as he conquered Mecca. It is a well known historically documented fact that in the year 630 CE Muhammad entered Mecca as the leader of an army of "ten thousand men".
In reading the English translation of Song of Songs 5:16 it finishes the description by saying: "He is altogether lovely" but what most people don't know is that the name of that man was given in the original megilot. Here is the name written in ancient Hebrew as it appears in verse sixteen: מחמד . It is read as : "Mahammad".
Hebrew: חִכּוֹ, מַמְתַקִּים, וְכֻלּוֹ, מַחֲמַדִּים; זֶה דוֹדִי וְזֶה רֵעִי, בְּנוֹת יְרוּשָׁלִָם.
English: His mouth is most sweet; yea, he is ALTOGETHER LOVELY. This is my beloved, and this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem.
There is a plural used together with this Hebrew word, with
the plural it’s pronounced “Mahamadd-im”. The ending letters 'im' is a plural of respect, majesty and grandeur for God’s prophet, just as in the word Eloh-im.
According to Ben Yehuda's Hebrew-English Dictionary, it is correctly pronounced as "Mahammad".
If you don't believe me, go to these translator links, paste the name מחמד and then translate it into English. You will see that מחמד is translated as "Muhammad".*
Without lies.....................
Blind devotee
@@MohidulIslam-zp2rf Islam dies without lies.
@@a_melly 🤣🤣🤣 your comment show your happiness
Muhammad is prophet for bani israel and prophet for all people in the world .
Muhammad is mentioned in every holybook .
Bani Israel more knew the charateristic of muhammad than their children .
But bani israel unbelieved , because Muhammad born from bani ismail .
I'm not arab man, i'm from indonesia, but i believe muhammad is true prophet and true messenger
Plain rubbish Mr Indonesia.
❤❤❤
Future Muslims.... InshaAllah
They are muslim pretending to be
Christian
He is mentioned in the old testimment I have made a research about it
So many liars and unscrupulous people with ulterior motives have done unreliable research to support false prophets like muhammad... just to discredit the Bible.But take courage GOD IS STILL IN CHARGE.
What a nonsense did Deedat made up. Nothing is changed. Now, is Muhammad predicted in Songs of Solomon 5:16?
חִכֹּו֙ מַֽמְתַקִּ֔ים וְכֻלֹּ֖ו מַחֲמַדִּ֑ים זֶ֤ה דֹודִי֙ וְזֶ֣ה רֵעִ֔י בְּנֹ֖ות יְרוּשָׁלִָֽם׃
ḥikwō maməṯaqqîm wəḵullwō maḥămadîm zeh ḏwōḏî wəzeh rē‘î bənwōṯ yərûšālāim:
“His mouth is most sweet; he is altogether lovely. This is my beloved, and this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem.”
The first mistake in here is that many islamic apologists say מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is ‘muhamaddim’. But that is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad.
The other mistake made by islamic apologists is that they say that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name (like יְהוִֹה, Yhvh). And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to name of Muhammad.
Also the claim that the plural 'im' (or 'eem') in ma-kha-madim in the Hebrew language was ‘added for respect’ is in this case false. First of all, nowhere in Songs of Solomon 5 it speaks about אֱלהִים, elohim, the masculine noun for a godhead. But Song of Solomon 5 speaks about ממתקים, mamtaqim and מחמדים, ma-kha-madim. So you can't compare apples with oranges. Biblical poetry is typically built on pairs of metaphors, for example "they were swifter than eagles, they were stronger than lions". In Song of Songs 5:16 it's "His mouth is most sweet, ממתקים, he is altogether lovely, מחמדים. So מחמדים, ma-kha-madim is equivalent to ממתקים, mamtaqim. So the addition ‘-im’ is just a superlative of ‘desire', so it means 'most desire'. Exactly in line with the other words in vers 16: ‘mamtaqim’ = most sweet and other places ‘partamim' = most noble.
Forms of the same Hebrew word are also used elsewhere in the Old Testament, yet Islamic ‘scholars' do not claim that those passages refer to Muhammad. Rightly so, since those verses cannot be forced to fit the notion that Muhammad is under consideration. For example, Isaiah 64:11 mourns the destruction of Jerusalem: “Our holy and beautiful temple, where our fathers praised You, is burned up with fire; and all our pleasant things are laid waste.” “Pleasant things” is a form of the same word in Song of Solomon 5:16. Would the Islamic ‘scholars' contend that Muhammad was “laid waste” in Jerusalem?
Additional occurrences of the same word are seen in 1 Kings 20:6; 2 Chronicles 36:19; Lamentations 1:10,11; Ezekiel 24:16,21,25; Hosea 9:9,16; Joel 3:5. Is in this cases also Muhammad mentioned? If yes, why? If not, why not?
So in Songs of Solomon no Muhammad.
This is all rubbish you are spouting
@@equityjustice2695 Don't accuse without evidence. If I'm wrong, please correct me with clear evidences and references. But it seems you're not able to do so.
@@reneandjohn you must be blind bro or you’re just deliberately being ignorant… I just you watch the video one more time , even a Jewish Rabbi confirmed the pronunciation of Mohammedim … look it up
@@reneandjohn *_[Jesus] said, "Indeed, I am the servant of Allah . He has given me the Scripture and made me a prophet._*
(Holy Quran - 19:30)
*_[Jesus said], "And indeed, Allah is my Lord and your Lord, so worship Him. That is a straight path."_*
(Holy Quran - 19:36)
@@reneandjohn The name "Muhammad" is written in the Bible in the original Hebrew language.
In the 5th chapter of the Shir haShirim ( שיר השירים ), which is one of the five megilot or Sacred Scrolls that are part of the Hebrew Bible or for short the "Song of Solomon" (also called "Song of Songs"). That chapter is giving a prophecy about an individual to come, a mystery man.
Song of Songs 5:15 compares this prophetic mystery man to the land of "Lebanon" which is the land of the Arabs. This implies that the mystery man would be an Arab.
Verse 15 of the NIV Bible says: “His appearance is like Lebanon", so this is an Arabic gentleman (or Arab looking).
Verse 11 says: "his head is as the most fine gold, his locks are
wavy, and black as a raven". Verse 10 describes this man as being "radiant and ruddy" which means he was slightly light-skinned with a rosy color. This physical description matches exactly with the authentic Islamic sources.
Sahih Al Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 56, Number 747, says Muhammad was slightly light skinned, with a rosy color (and has the same hair as is mentioned in verse 11)
Song of Songs 5:10 says: "My beloved is white and ruddy, pre-eminent above ten thousand." This is a prophecy of Prophet Muhammad as he conquered Mecca. It is a well known historically documented fact that in the year 630 CE Muhammad entered Mecca as the leader of an army of "ten thousand men".
In reading the English translation of Song of Songs 5:16 it finishes the description by saying: "He is altogether lovely" but what most people don't know is that the name of that man was given in the original megilot. Here is the name written in ancient Hebrew as it appears in verse sixteen: מחמד . It is read as : "Mahammad".
Hebrew: חִכּוֹ, מַמְתַקִּים, וְכֻלּוֹ, מַחֲמַדִּים; זֶה דוֹדִי וְזֶה רֵעִי, בְּנוֹת יְרוּשָׁלִָם.
English: His mouth is most sweet; yea, he is ALTOGETHER LOVELY. This is my beloved, and this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem.
There is a plural used together with this Hebrew word, with
the plural it’s pronounced “Mahamadd-im”. The ending letters 'im' is a plural of respect, majesty and grandeur for God’s prophet, just as in the word Eloh-im.
According to Ben Yehuda's Hebrew-English Dictionary, it is correctly pronounced as "Mahammad".
If you don't believe me, go to these translator links, paste the name מחמד and then translate it into English. You will see that מחמד is translated as "Muhammad".*
God has certainly made ONE religion for ALL with pure logic and no difficulty for his servant to understand, as we only use 10% of our brain capacity........ many many think they can fool the Most Merciful but indeed it is satan that is fooling them. Allah o Akbar!!
God hasn't made any religions. All religions are man made
The most noble,the most influenced people on earth is prophet Muhammad SAW. No one is equal to him. He has followers more than 1,9 billion people who is still alive plus his passed-away followers, totally his followers maybe more than 2,5 Billion. Not only followers but following what he teach such as sholat ( prayer ) 5 x /day, Fasting, not drinking alcoholic drink, not eating haram (pork) etc. His name is said ( called ) by his followers every day at least 5 billion times a day all over the world. What is the fact ? Every muslims do prayer ( sholat ) at least five times a day. In one sholat at least we called asyhha duannaMuhammadurasulAllah 2 times by every moslem doing sholat plus shalah sunnah, plus Sholawat,Adzan from Mosques, from medias etc and this is done every day by his followers, 1,9 Billion followers plus all medias. So his name is said at least 5 Billions or more every day? Who is more noble than him? Jesus? No. No follower of Jesus following what he teach. Most of those who describe theirself as follower of Jesus they still drink alcoholic, eating pork, having statues,Idol etc. In Indonesia only, there are at least 1 million Mosques ( big and small mosques ). Many muslims in indonesia like sholawat to our beloved leader, prophet Muhammad SAW.
Hi Brothers From Morocco
i am Muslim AL hamdo Lilah
they didnt translated it, they just use the meaning of the word muhammadim means "sweet, lovely, desire"... it is obviously not muhammad... totally different person and meaning.. People nowadays are spitting misinformation for their own benefit.. if u dont agree with me. then search it for yourself.
React "Dr Zakir Naik proves Hell and Heaven in Two Ways"
You 3 going good work
Is so painful to see how this man was blind by his teachings and he had led so many blinded people to fall in a ditch, makes me wonder how tormented his soul will be in hell, what makes me even more sorry for his people is that he can’t come back to life to correct this false teaching.
You said your Muslim when your title says Christians react?
Firstly why didn't allah or jibreel reveal to Muhammad he is named in the Bible. Secondly if Muhammad was schooled by Waraqah in the scriptures why didn't Waraqah or Muhammad himself testify of Muhammad in the scriptures. It is obvious that allah, jibreel, Waraqah and Muhammad could not because Muhammad's name isn't there, that's logical commonsense.
Finally muslims claim that Ahmed supposedly another name for Muhammad is found in John 16:12-14 as the spirit of Truth. Now that passage says Jesus will send the spirit of Truth and the Quran says allah sent Muhammad as a mercy to the world, would it not make sense then that Jesus is allah since the spirit of Truth was sent by Jesus.
Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.
John 16:7
How Mohammed is the comforter if he is send by Jesus?
Every prophet or messenger will bring news, something new like a revelation given from God...in that revelation there is some part will prophercise the coming new prophet in each era
@@hufun3789 That’s not the answer to the question. The phrase says that the Comforter will be sent by Jesus Christ. Now again, is Muhammad sent by Jesus Christ? Yes or no.
@@hufun3789but the new thing that is sent by a prophet also should not contradict what every true prophet before him said.
@@reneandjohn *Prophet Jesus’ mission is limited to the banu Israelis*
*Prophet Jesus’ mission was over*
*Prophet Jesus’ disciples are banu Israelis*
*Prophet Jesus advised them to follow his Comforter, Prophet Muhammad (Sal) who is yet to come after Prophet Jesus*
*That is why, Jesus says he will ask God to send ANOTHER COMFORTER who will abide with you forever*
(John 14:16)
*Jesus’ Comforter is not a holy spirit*
*Holy spirit was there with Jesus & his disciples*
*ANOTHER COMFORTER is a human being who is Prophet Muhammad (Sal)*
No they did on PURPOSE to derail the truth
*do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God*
(1 John 4:1)
*Your bible clearly calls spirits are Prophets*
*Spirits of truth are Prophets, according to bible*
*John 16:13 clearly proves that the spirit of truth is Prophet Muhammad (Sal)*
But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all the truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come. (John 16:13)
👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
_When the spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth_
*This speaks about the coming of Prophet Muhammad (Sal) who will guide people into the truth*
_He will not speak on his own_
*Of course!*
*Prophet Muhammad (Sal) will not preach on his own*
*Prophet Muhammad (Sal) will preach people through the revelation from God Almighty Allah*
_He will speak what he hears_
*Prophet Muhammad (Sal) will speak what he hears from God Almighty Allah*
_He will tell you what is yet to come_
*This speaks about Prophet Muhammad (Sal)’s Prophecies*
*So, John 16:13 clearly proves Jesus’ Comforter is a human being who is Prophet Muhammad (Sal)*
Ahmad deedat the master of twisting.
When you read the Text of John, you will never understand that this is "Muhammed".
Absolutely Impossible.
Very sad that he is lying about the text, and even sadder ist that so much people believe the lie. Why the people dont Open the bible and Look in the context.
why one man can lie so bold and so much people celebrate him?
You are the one who lying
the Prophet Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace. It is mentioned in the Bible, in fact, in the Hebrew language
@@KhaledneganGyop I thing you mean the Text in the book "Songs of Salomo"
Because John was written in greece.
In the "Songs of Salomo" is written "mahmadim" and it is meaning "beloved"
When you Look at the context you will understand this is Not a prophecy its only a Love Song.
look we can do Something together, you send me, step by step, all Verses where do you thing its a prophecy for Muhammed, and we look into the Texts together.
@@KhaledneganGyop Deedat was wrong in many ways. When you read John 14-16 in context, then it will become clear that the Paracletos (translated as Comforter or Helper) does not fit Muhammad at all. First of all, in John 14-16 Jesus Christ was speaking to His disciples.
But Muhammad was not with the disciples (John 14:17).
And Muhammad was not in the disciples after Jesus Christ's ascension (John 14:17).
Muhammad was not sent in Jesus' name (John 14:26).
Muhammad was not the Holy Spirit (John 14:26).
Muhammad did not teach the disciples (John 14:26).
Muhammad did not remember the disciples everything what Jesus Christ has said to them (John14:26).
Muhammad is not sent by Jesus Christ (John 15:26 and 16:7).
Muhammad did not testify about Jesus Christ to the disciples (John 15:26).
Muhammad did not guide the disciples in all truth (John 16:13).
Muhammad did not disclose it to the disciples (John 16:13).
Muhammad did not glorify Jesus Christ (John 16:14).
Muhammad did not become his 'revelation' from Jesus Christ (John 16:14 and 16:15).
So the Paracletos is definitely not Muhammad.
@@KhaledneganGyop Deedat was no scholar in classic Hebrew. Moreover he was not even officially educated. And never did Deedat refer to Hebrew scholars or high valuated Hebrew dictionaries to make his point.
Now, is Muhammad predicted in Songs of Solomon 5:16?
חִכֹּו֙ מַֽמְתַקִּ֔ים וְכֻלֹּ֖ו מַחֲמַדִּ֑ים זֶ֤ה דֹודִי֙ וְזֶ֣ה רֵעִ֔י בְּנֹ֖ות יְרוּשָׁלִָֽם׃
ḥikwō maməṯaqqîm wəḵullwō maḥămadîm zeh ḏwōḏî wəzeh rē‘î bənwōṯ yərûšālāim:
“His mouth is most sweet; he is altogether lovely. This is my beloved, and this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem.”
The first mistake by Deedat is that he pronounced מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as ‘muhamaddim’. But he is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad.
The other mistake made by Deedat is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again he is very wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name (like יְהוִֹה, Yhvh). And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to the name of ‘Muhammad’.
Also the claim that the plural 'im' (or 'eem') in ma-kha-madim in the Hebrew language was ‘added for respect’ is in this case false. First of all, nowhere in Songs of Solomon 5 it speaks about אֱלהִים, elohim, the masculine noun for a godhead. But Song of Solomon 5 speaks about ממתקים, mamtaqim and מחמדים, ma-kha-madim. So you can't compare apples with oranges. Biblical poetry is typically built on pairs of metaphors, for example "they were swifter than eagles, they were stronger than lions". In Song of Songs 5:16 it's "His mouth is most sweet, ממתקים, he is altogether lovely, מחמדים. So מחמדים, ma-kha-madim is equivalent to ממתקים, mamtaqim. So the addition ‘-im’ is just a superlative of ‘desire', so it means 'most desire'. Exactly in line with the other words in vers 16: ‘mamtaqim’ = most sweet and other places ‘partamim' = most noble.
Forms of the same Hebrew word are also used elsewhere in the Old Testament, yet Islamic ‘scholars' do not claim that those passages refer to Muhammad. Rightly so, since those verses cannot be forced to fit the notion that Muhammad is under consideration. For example, Isaiah 64:11 mourns the destruction of Jerusalem: “Our holy and beautiful temple, where our fathers praised You, is burned up with fire; and all our pleasant things are laid waste.” “Pleasant things” is a form of the same word in Song of Solomon 5:16. Would Deedat contend that Muhammad was “laid waste” in Jerusalem?
Additional occurrences of the same word are seen in 1 Kings 20:6; 2 Chronicles 36:19; Lamentations 1:10,11; Ezekiel 24:16,21,25; Hosea 9:9,16; Joel 3:5. Is in this cases also Muhammad mentioned? If yes, why? If not, why not?
So in Songs of Solomon there is no Muhammad.
Deedat was also wrong about 1 John 4. It says: “Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.”. But the verse is clear e.g. in the word ‘because’. In Greek “ὅτι’ = ‘hoti” which means ’that’ or ‘since’ or ‘because’. Clearly this verse only states that spirits are the result of the presence of false prophets in the world. So 1 John 4:1 clearly states that false prophets are the course and spirits are the result. That makes clear that prophets and spirits are NOT the same, they are two different types of entities.
Muhammad never performed miracles and never preached God's Word, he never raised the dead, he never claimed God as his father, nor did he claim to be God, no one Worshipped him, no one acknowledged him as the Saviour, he never gave sight to the blind, he never opened the ears or mouth of a mute, he had no authority over the devil or demons, he couldn't cast out evil spirits from within the soul of a human, he couldn't make the lame to walk, or feed the multitudes of people with a few loaves of bread and fish, he couldn't turn water into wine, The God of Heaven never spoke to him, The God of Abraham never sent him as a servant or a messenger, he gave no one Hope, Direction, Truth, Eternal Life or Salvation, he was not a prophet, he was not a Son of God, the Holy Spirit was not with or living in him, he died and was buried by his own followers never to raise again, he did not die for anyone, he did not die for our sins, he is not seated at the right hand of the Father. Only Jesus, Lord of lords and King of kings our Saviour Forever and ever Amene.
There is an important prophecy in the Song of Songs (5:9-16). In this prophecy, the person being talked about here is God's lover. One of the characteristic names of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is Habibullah - the one whom God loves. Second: "My lover is white and ruddy". This is the skin color of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) Third, "Leader among ten thousand". We have shown that the Prophet Muhammad was the leader of his ten thousand followers at the time of the conquest of Mecca.
The fourth and most striking point in this prophecy is the name of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) in verse 16. It reads: " Yea, he is altogether lovely"(Everything about him is interesting) in the English Bible. In the Hebrew Bible, this word is written " Muhammad-im ". See Hebrew Bible printed for the British and Foreign Bible Society by Trowitzsch & Sons, Berlin, P. 1159.
, أحمد = the praise one. its name of prophete muhammed pbuh
Not in Bible ! Paulus or saulus from tartus' change original teks aramic to Greek language 😡
The idea of one god and only one is to much for there brain
Yuall go to Rob Christian and Christian Prince waste of time what yuall doing 😅😅😅😅
Just remember that Satan is a better deceiver than you are a perceiver. God warned us about ALL this
Also who claims to be the greatest deceiver as well? Allah. Allah claims he is the greatest deceiver. Either Satan has some big competition or Allah is Satan
@@TatyanaKosh*_Allah is not the deceiver of anyone_*
*_Jesus was a Muslim & his faith was Islam_*
👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
*_[Jesus] said, "Indeed, I am the servant of Allah . He has given me the Scripture and made me a prophet._*
(Holy Quran - 19:30)
*_[Jesus said], "And indeed, Allah is my Lord and your Lord, so worship Him. That is a straight path."_*
(Holy Quran - 19:36)
For people who say why would they change the name muhammah pbuh to altogether lovely or whatever they do that becuase if christians see it and understand what jesus was really trying to preach everyone would become a muslim because muhammad preached for the uniqueness of god no son no nothing all alone and powerful so by that there's no proof of muhammad pbuh in the bible and try to corrupt it for people to go astray from the truth. May allah guide us all to his path and grant us jannah ameen.
So you are saying that all the Jews and all the Christians for together and changed it to mean “not Muhammad” in all translations and all nations and languages that were translated to that point, by both the Jews and the Christians? 😂
@@TatyanaKosh in Hebrew it says Muhammad 🐸 in English AlTogEthEr LoVeLy🐸
@@houssxm7016 but that mukhamadim is not a name.
Like in English a magazine is called a magazine, but in Russian magazin is a store. They SOUND the same but they are not the same thing. Context matters.
The “altogether lovely” is not a prophecy. Just a word that sounds like a name. There are a lot of names that sound like Hebrew words. Does not mean it is prophecy of those people
NO!
These are some of the important biblical passages which Muslims emphasize contain prophecies concerning Muhammad. Quite clearly not a single one constitutes a prediction about him. Muhammad is not mentioned explicitly or ;implicitly in the Bible, God's oldest written revelation (and the only written revelation as far as Christians are concerned). But Christ Jesus is found in the Quran. And what it says about Him places Him far above the founder of Islam.
Nope. Muhammad the prophet is no where in the Bible. Not even the original Hebrew text. Do your study and research. The Arabic name, Muhammad (مُحَمَّد), apparently means “praiseworthy”, but its Hebrew cognate (a passive participle of the verb חמד) would be “beloved”.
Q7:157 muhammad mentioned in torah and gosples, not any where in the bible song of solomons is not part of torah or gosple, the comforter is the holy spirit, muhammad was not holy or a spirit
John 14:15-17
If you love me, keep my commands. And I will ask the Father and he will give you another Helper, that he may abide with you forever- the Spirit of Truth, whom the World cannot receive, because it neither sees him nor knows him, because he dwells with you and will be in you.
Is Allah a father?
Did Jesus send Muhammad?
Did the world not see Muhammad?
Does Muhammad dwell with you?
Is Muhammad in you? 🤔
@@TatyanaKosh *Prophet Jesus’ mission is limited to the banu Israelis*
*Prophet Jesus’ mission was over*
*Prophet Jesus’ disciples are banu Israelis*
*Prophet Jesus advised them to follow his Comforter, Prophet Muhammad (Sal) who is yet to come after Prophet Jesus*
*That is why, Jesus says he will ask God to send ANOTHER COMFORTER who will abide with you forever*
(John 14:16)
*Jesus’ Comforter is not a holy spirit*
*Holy spirit was there with Jesus & his disciples*
*ANOTHER COMFORTER is a human being who is Prophet Muhammad (Sal)*
Ahmed Deedat is telling a lie
It is NOT "Muhammadim"
It is ma-kha-madim
Sorry to Lie TV
Mohammed in Arabic has the letter ح which is equivalent to the Hebrew to the sound kha
You are a fooled the song of Solomon is concerning Jesus, no mahomed .
Hello, i hope you are doing well. I think you must watch the story of yusuf estes. How he became muslim. You will learn a lot of things. God bless you all. 😊
8:21 the verse he mentiones not only proves coming of Mohammad(PBHU) but also coming of Mahdi , the 12th decendent of Prophet and the saviour
Try harder next time.
PLEASE react to this video i linked below,
How Is Prophet Muhammad Mentioned In the 4,000 Years Old Book Of Hinduism?
This Christian also reacts to this stuff: LOL LOL I mean there are lies in the world and then there is dahwah LOL funny.
Islam is the only religion which glorified jesus( hazrat isa pbuh
“Take advantage of five before five: your youth before your old age, your health before your sickness, your wealth before your poverty, your free time before your busyness, and your life before your death.”
Prophet Muhammad ﷺ
This is incorrect. I don’t understand why it’s used over and over again🤦🏻♂️
I can’t understand why Muslim followers would keep using this argument. I am here to learn of the truth. Not them trying to justify their prophet.
It does not say Mohamed
Can you explain your knowledge on this?
@@CosmicJayy Song of Solomon if Muhammad is mentioned there it’s means he’s gay
@@mhizummy2091
And if your mother is mentioned, this means that she is a prostitute 😒
He isn't justifying the prophet. It just happens that the bible actually refers to Muhammad in few places. Many proved and disproved the argument, but in the end there is only one truth, and I really hope you find it.
@@mhizummy2091 Not quite. The song of Solomon is written from different perspectives (he and she). People who don't read it attentively, might confuse the perspectives. Have a good day!
In your dreams 😅
Mohamed is not in the Bible but Praise God Jesus Christ 🙏🔥
Always struggling to validate their Islam religion through lies and deceit.
1:50 first lie. This isn't a "plural of respect". It's just plural 🤦♂️🤣. Horses in the plural would be "susim". Mountains are called "harim". Rivers are "naharim" There isn't anything about "respect". Just plural
5:00 fake jew
Ultimately, the word "hmd" חמד is all over the hebrew Bible. Because it's a common word. Many people have names that are all over the Bible. The thing is, none of these חמד mentions in the Bible have anything to do with Muhammad. In the context of the passages it doesn't make any sense at all to pretend they refer to him
Are you scared the name Muhammad mention in the Bible
@@zanzillahsaruji9966 the name "חמד" is all over the Bible, you m0r0n🤣
@@zanzillahsaruji9966 are you afraid to be honest about things like "plural of respect"? Hebrew doesn't have that🐐🐐🐐
@@tbishop4961 i'm a Jewish . Muhammad was mentioned in your bible . Don't make a false information brother
@@Kaiser.ego0 🤣🤥🤥🤥
It's important to kwow that all Muslim will be in the hell. Please to read your Qur'ran Sura Maryam verse 71. If You want to be free from the hell fire, just to believe in Jesus as Your Savior right now.
Christians just keep on making sin no need to repent hell is waiting for you
Nah we will be in hell if we following your false religion . Nothing can change my mind . Jesus is the messenger of Allah . I'm an ex-Christian and I bear witness that Islam is a true religion
The truth is undeniable, may Allah help your heart find the Truth
My understanding,, Muhammad is not coming inside the Holy Bible ,,, Only the God of Abraham, Issac's Jacob and the Son of God ,, Jesus Christ. Muhammad is not Jesus Christ , no Muhammad name replace to Jesus Christ the Son of God.
Jesus mentioned not Muhammad.
Ahmed deedat spoke against Holy God and his tongue was struck till his last death.
Lies. Lies.
When you read John 14-16 in context, then it will become clear that the Paracletos (translated as Comforter or Helper) does not fit Muhammad at all. First of all, in John 14-16 Jesus Christ was speaking to His disciples.
But Muhammad was not with the disciples (John 14:17).
And Muhammad was not in the disciples after Jesus Christ's ascension (John 14:17).
Muhammad was not sent in Jesus' name (John 14:26).
Muhammad was not the Holy Spirit (John 14:26).
Muhammad did not teach the disciples (John 14:26).
Muhammad did not remember the disciples everything what Jesus Christ has said to them (John14:26).
Muhammad is not sent by Jesus Christ (John 15:26 and 16:7).
Muhammad did not testify about Jesus Christ to the disciples (John 15:26).
Muhammad did not guide the disciples in all truth (John 16:13).
Muhammad did not disclose it to the disciples (John 16:13).
Muhammad did not glorify Jesus Christ (John 16:14).
Muhammad did not become his 'revelation' from Jesus Christ (John 16:14 and 16:15).
So the Paracletos is definitely not Muhammad.
Absolutely. Amen
Muhammad never performed miracles and never preached God's Word, he never raised the dead, he never claimed God as his father, nor did he claim to be God, no one Worshipped him, no one acknowledged him as the Saviour, he never gave sight to the blind, he never opened the ears or mouth of a mute, he had no authority over the devil or demons, he couldn't cast out evil spirits from within the soul of a human, he couldn't make the lame to walk, or feed the multitudes of people with a few loaves of bread and fish, he couldn't turn water into wine, The God of Heaven never spoke to him, The God of Abraham never sent him as a servant or a messenger, he gave no one Hope, Direction, Truth, Eternal Life or Salvation, he was not a prophet, he was not a Son of God, the Holy Spirit was not with or living in him, he died and was buried by his own followers never to raise again, he did not die for anyone, he did not die for our sins, he is not seated at the right hand of the Father. Only Jesus, Lord of lords and King of kings our Saviour Forever and ever Amene.
read the quran please muhammad did one of them he split the moon and made it go back together by the will of god (allah) and of course he won't preach jesus being god because he's not and of course he didn't claim to be god because he's not he's just a prophet as jesus pbuh he spoke to jinns and many more miracles jesus god gave him his own miracles just like he did with all the other prophets why jesus is special and god he never claimed to be one you've been missguided jesus is a prophet of god pbuh and he shall come back at the end of the time to kill the antichrist and say the truth you either going to follow him or as most christians do say he's not our god because he'll preach allah and say that he is a messenger of god may allah guide you and bless you and as i said read the quran or read the old original scriptures of the bible @@jerrygerardtetaiaharereroa1052
@@jerrygerardtetaiaharereroa1052Muhammad(PBUH) had the greatest miracle of all, which you can still see today and witness. It is the Quran. You will not find any historical, scientific or logical error in it. If you can, we’d all convert. Muslims read and try to memorize the entire Quran, while most Christians haven’t read their book. It’s a shame
@Elion004 you and mohammed are a joke. Anyone can write that fraudulent book.
Stop these lies 😂
That's only alibi of the Muslim no evidence.
no evidence??? are you fkn blind and deaf????? the whole video is evidence.
This is a stupid argument. What difference does it make whether Prophet Muhammad is mentioned or not. Jesus is mentioned in the Quran. So, what difference it has made to a Muslim? This is absolute Hog wash. Hope Ahmed Deedar repented before he died. What he says is pure blasphemy. He died a horrible death.
Jesus is mentioned in the Quran so Muslims believe in him as Christ
Mohammed is mentioned in the Bible yet the Christians don’t believe in him. that’s the difference
@@acultofpersonality7162what does it mean to you that he is “Christ” does the Quran explain?
And Muhammad is in fact indirectly mentioned in the Bible, though Song of Solomon passage is not it. The Bible does not speak of a coming prophet after Jesus, only warns about the coming false prophets. Your desperate attempt to fit Muhammad into the Bible is laughable. He was a false prophet.
@@TatyanaKosh
So You are just going to ignore the existence of Mohammed name in the Hebrew Bible? I am talking about the sos 5:16
Didn't the bible predict a prophet coming to the Mount Sela' ?? And people are singing for his arrival? Tell me throughout the history when and where did this prophecy came to be fulfilled?? I double dare you!! I'm talking about Isaiah 42
What about the prophet who is going to receive the revelation and will respond with "I am not literate" When and to who this prophecy was fulfilled??? I double dare you to appoint 1 man throughout the history!! I am talking about Isaiah 29:12
What about Jesus's prophesy in John 16:12-13 John 14:16 ???? Who is this??
It can't be the holy spirit because Jesus Christ said in John 16:7 that he can NOT come until Jesus depart and we all know that the holy spirit was present at the time of Jesus!!
@@acultofpersonality7162 no, Song of Solomon does not include Muhammad’s name. Just because one word might sound like another word or a name, does not make it so. There are many names that sound like Hebrew words. Are those too prophecies about those people? It’s silly to take a somewhat same sounding word and take it way out of context and say that is some kind of prophecy. Context matters, a LOT.
Also there are other places in scripture that use that same Hebrew word in other places, and no Muslim ever mentions those. Would you be willing to accept those places as prophecies about Muhammad as well
That word machmad means something like pleasant, treasured, lovely and is used in other places. Shall we take a look at a few?
First we will look again at Song of Solomon. Solomon’s bride is going back and forth and telling her love and desire for him, and he about her.
If the her beloved means Muhammad,
In 7:10 she says:
I belong to my beloved, and his desire is for me.
So does that mean Solomon’s bride belongs to Muhammad and Muhammad desires her, a woman dead for some 1500 years?
Ezekiel 24:16
“Son of man, with one blow I am about to take away from you the DELIGHT of your eyes. You do not lenient of weep or shed any tears.”
Ezekiel’s wife is being called machmad, because she is treasured be Ezekiel.
So if Machmad means Muhammad, then Muhammad must have been Ezekiel’s wife?
Ezekiel 24:21
“Say to the people of Israel: this is what the Sovereign Lord says: I am about to desecrate my sanctuary- the stronghold in which you take your pride, the DELIGHT of your eyes, the object of your affection. The sons and daughters you left behind will fall by the sword.”
Again the word delight here is machmad.
So if machmad means Muhammad, God is therefore promising to desecrate Muhammad?
This is what happens when Muslims try to force Muhammad into the Bible.
@@acultofpersonality7162 and now Isaiah 42.
The “servant” imagery was fulfilled in Jesus Christ. (Matthew 12:15-21)
“A large crowd followed him, and he healed all who were ill. He warned them not to tell others about him. This was to fulfill what was spoken through the prophet Isaiah:
“Here is my servant whom I have chosen,
the one I love, in whom I delight;
I will put my Spirit on him,
and he will proclaim justice to the nations.
He will not quarrel or cry out;
no one will hear his voice in the streets.
A bruised reed he will not break,
and a smoldering wick he will not snuff out,
till he has brought justice through to victory.
In his name the nations will put their hope.”
This is also applicable to Israel at times as well, being the “servant”
Isaiah 41:8
“But you, Israel, my servant, Jacob, whom I have chosen, you descendants of Abraham my friend”, and the other places refers to the servant being those of Israel who are faithful, not the unfaithful
And then from 42:10 it says that the praises of the earth will be sung by the sea and on the islands and emotes kedar and selah, Kedar being towns in plural, meaning not a specific one little town but scattered throughout the wilderness,
And Selah was actually a name for several geographical locations in history.
Again, this is more talking about that the praises of the Lord will be sung throughout the earth, not that a single prophet will come out of Sela
😂😂😂you muslims are dillusional.
No Mo to be found in the bible
Muhammad (pbuh) his there no matter whatever u think u Christians took his name out so why did u to that the reason his if u Christians find the truth u will convert so Christianality his finshed so all u Christians Muhammad (pbuh)his in your bible case closed.
We Christians took his name out when?
And Jews also all of et the world took his name out as well? 😂
Sunan-an Nasa'i Sahih Hadith 3415 Aisah said,Muhammad hit her in the chest that hurt her.False teacher Deedat said the bible is corrupt but he is looking for muhammad in the bible.The comforter sent by Jesus is the Holy Spirit.If Jesus sent Muhammad it means Jesus is God.