TOP 10 DIFFERENCES Between THE BAD GUYS Movie and Books
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ค. 2024
- The Bad Guys movie is actually pretty good, but what did Dreamworks change from The Bad Guys books? What are the biggest changes that Dreamworks made to The Bad Guys film? Here are my top 10 differences between The Bad Guys movie and books.
Music from Uppbeat (free for Creators!):
uppbeat.io/t/soundroll/good-t...
License code: 8DYTQOI9TVAZXGXS
uppbeat.io/t/hartzmann/clear-sky
License code: BHKH36BBEXRZFRBU
the bad guys books,the bad guys book 1,the bad guys movie 2022,the bad guys movie,differences between the bad guys books and movie,changes dreamworks made to bad guys movie,differences between the bad guys movie and books,the bad guys first 6 minutes,the bad guys isn't that bad,the bad guys isn't your typical dreamworks movie,the bad guys isn't bad,the bad guys adaption changes - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
“Ok what changes should we make?”
“Definitely make the wolf hot.”
“What??”
"and also make the snake hot"
"What-?!"
@@NightLandscapes256 And the tarantula.
@@genetlair5999 yup
@@genetlair5999 "WH-"
Me: shhhh- no questions
@@NightLandscapes256 come on guys! Don't forget to add Diane in the party! That fat tush was pretty uncalled for... But so needed xd
You forgot one more detail. In the movie, it’s a world we’re humans and anthropomorphic animals coexist. But in the book, the whole world is populated with anthropomorphic animals
And they introduce the multiverse later on in the book series.
Edit: 100 Likes, WTF!?
Oh yeah
*where.
Not we're (meaning 'we are')
Yes
Ur sonic
If you also didn’t notice, Pirahna ( dont know how to spell his name) had limbs. In the book, Pirahna is just a fish and dosen’t really have hands and legs. But in the movie, they gave him limbs.
Uhhh I think those limbs are supposed to be his fins and tail? Then again what do I know. To be honest with you his head looks like a papaya or mango to me.
*Piranha. You had it close. :)
Same with shark
Piranha
@@ivanacurna6577 Actually I think his ponytail is his tail...
Another detail: In the books, Snake and Wolf are childhood friends, knowing each other with a same or similar age while in the movie, if you look closely when they're getting their mugshots, you can see Wolf was born in 1991 while Snake in 1965, meaning that he's 26 years older. I think that Snake was already a young adult when he met Wolf as a child. Maybe Moe (Wolf's real name in the books) was an orphan until Snake somehow found him and took care of him, teaching him how to be a experienced criminal (maybe he was a rejected orphan too so he identified with him. In the books they don't explain if they have parents). Giving us to understand that in the movie's universe they have more like a dad-son relationship. That's whay they have a stronger bond than the other members of the crew, because they already came from diferent paths (This is confirmed by the fact that they used to be individual criminals).
:0 cool theory
@@whyl0ser91 its notva theory
m-man...
this movie just got dark...
Me: *looking at comments*
Also Me: *Sees this comment and presses read more* ‘dam that’s a big comment’
They ship snake and wolf which is are pretty fck up
The last part of marmalade being an alien with many butts makes me think of the meteor where piranha calls it a butt-rock
They actually used a running gag from much later in the book series. In the movie Marmalade keeps correcting that the meteorite isn't a butt. Later in the books another character continually corrects that they are hand tentacles not butts.
that explains a lot xD
Fun fact: In an interview (need to find it again), the producers of The Bad Guys Movie said that they were originally going to reveal Marmalade's true form as an Alien in the Movie just like how he does in the books, but it was deemed to be going too far. And it made them think that people would just leave theaters during the movie because it just got too crazy, despite it being based off the source material, aka the books. So in that case, they said they're saving the reveal for a potential sequel (which they say they really want to do.) It's also another reason why they put in the butt jokes that Piranha makes in the movie which annoys Marmalade, because it was already established that he would be the one to annoy him with that when he reveals his true form in the potential sequel, and it's a reference to Marmalade's real form as an alien in the books where he has tentacles with some butts at the end (as wierd as that might sound to those who haven't read the books.) So yes, it's confirmed that Marmalade is an alien in the movie verse as well. That gives me more credibility on my theory of him being the one who brought down the meteorite onto the city in the movie.
Also, here's what Director Pierre Perifel had to say about there being humans in the movie, unlike the books where it's all anthropomorphic animals. "A few reasons. The first is, from the beginning, I wanted to do something that is different. The big idea in the film is that those are legendary characters that we wrote stories about and are afraid of, and it really comes from a human standpoint, you know? When you write about the Big Bad Wolf, it's a human idea it's not another animal idea. I didn't wanted to end up with the idea that those were predators in a world of preys, that would've been full on Zootopia. First of all, that concept is not exactly what I wanted to tell as a story, the story was like, we are having these characters which are prejudices, or we're prejudices against them. It was all about stereotyping and not about prey vs predator, you know? We thought 'hang on. How would a giraffe react to a piranha? They wouldn't care. But we, as humans, we do care.' and so therefore, for me, it's a metaphor our fears, these characters are a metaphor for our fears and it was important to just get the rest of the world as humans. They're really just wearing masks, they're criminal wearing masks, they're scary people wearing masks of scary animals. And Marmalade is the same thing, it's stereotyping something that is cute but is actually the opposite of that. So, it was important to keep the human standpoint on prejudice."
Love this movie!!💖💖💖 And I find all of this interesting.
I don’t mind humans in the world, but why not add anthro characters with good reputations like Golden Retrievers or Sheep in prominent roles in society? My issue with the human characters is they all look the same and that ugly Steven universe styles ruins the film visually.
Also surprised they made tiffany fluffit a human as well, I mean she was a cat in the book and don’t they want to sell more toys?
Yo that's interesting
@@jamesaragonastudio6476 I totally agree. Could’ve been a conscious mixture of anthro and humans. It didn’t have to end up like Zootopia. I don’t see the excuse for at least not making Tiffany a cat like she was supposed to
At least do you remeber where do you found this information?
@@jamesaragonastudio6476 they took inspiration from anime on the visual style, it’s not actually a “Steven Universe” or “CalArts” thing. Tbh, it’s a Studio Ghibli thing. And an Aardman thing as well, but the Artist took inspiration from anime. I’m just pointing out that that style has been around for a while already.
They could add the whole part with Diane losing her parents to hunters if they ever do a sequel, it would explain a bit more about her and why she would become a thief in the first place. trama and grief can affect someone.
@Random_Aj i know right
That confirms there is a part 2 of the movie
@@ankhaforest9249 well yeah
4:18 I believe he’s still an alien but the movie only goes up to Book 4 if I remember correctly. Marmalade wasn’t revealed to be an alien until Book 5
I am certain they are going to make bad guys 2 which involves marmalade being an alien
SO WE WILL GET A BAD GUYS 2!
There’s one thing we should all keep in mind. This whole thing about Dreamworks basing a movie off of a book and changing the story has happened before. Look at how different the HTTYD books are compared to the HTTYD movies
Also Shrek was based off a book that was completely different
@@djfan-naf8136 Rise of the Guardians too
I think they might have changed Trantulas nickname from "Legs" to "Webs" because they changed her character to female. Probably didn't want to sound like the guys didn't respect her.
Or you know, the fact that she’s a computer genius and “webs” can be a double entendres.
@@TheGreatestSpy4life WEBsite
@@TheGreatestSpy4life or both
Turning Tiffany Fluffit into a human made no sense since she still retains the surname, 'Fluffit'.
I think I like Dreamworks’s adaptations better than the original source material. How To Train Your Dragon is a good example. I never knew about the books existence until a couple years ago an I can definitely say the movies are better despite them having almost a completely different plot and character design in comparison to the original. Dreamworks knows what’s more appealing to the audience, so it makes sense why they would do things like converting Toothless’s tiny green snake dragon design into a cool, ferocious kitty cat creature. Same goes for this movie by giving the characters more humanoid designs and personalities in order to keep it from being childish and obnoxious.
i 100% agree on that
I remember trying to read the books and I just couldn't get into them.
I concur.
I quite like the books. While I agree the movies are better storywise (books were very inconsistent) I liked the whole vibe of the books better than the movies.
Random things about the books:
The books were really gritty (I’m not sure if gritty is the right word, but yeah I’m gonna use it). Hiccup went through a LOT of ordeals in the books, a LOT worse than what he went through in the movies.
Don’t get me wrong, Movie hiccup went through some bad crap, but Book Hiccup was dipped into freezing cold water tied up in chains, surfed on lava, got poisoned, got imprisoned in a tree with a creepy old witch, etc, etc. (that isn’t even the worst of it)
The world was really dark and dank, and they didn’t just show berk, they showed the entire archipelago in the books.
Snoutlout was way more developed in the books.
There’s this character named Camicazi who they replaced with Astrid in the movies. I prefer Camicazi over all as a character, IMO she is way more fun, but it makes sense to me why they replaced her because Astrid fit more for the narrative of the movies.
But the biggest problem with the books is that they were VERY inconsistent, the maps were inconsistent, the details were inconsistent, many things were messed up.
I really loved the character growth and developpement in the movie, it was beautiful and a thing I was SO glad to see
From what I've heard, female tarantulas can live pretty long lives (ranging from 20+ to 30+ years) compared to their smaller and leggier males. Maybe that's why they changed Webs' gender.
Or they wanted to add a female to the crew to change it up
@@KayKorTeeVee I think it was a good choice. I'm tired of the "all male gangs" in movies. My only problem is her voice, it's kinda annoying for me.
@@redpanda6497 yea I get that, I like a change now and then
@@redpanda6497 If you think that was annoying, the person that voiced her (Awkwafina) also did the voice of Sisu in Raya and the Last Dragon and from what I heard, she has a ton of terrible lines in that film.
@@redpanda6497 "annoying".
Can you explain how's that "annoying"?
You forgot the fact that the Zittens are in book 4 and marmalade was barely in the first one and it was mainly just about wolf trying to get the gang to go gun
I was unaware that the movie went up to book 4
He said top 10
An adaptation doesn't necessarily have to follow its source material to the letter.
But considering this is the first time these characters are being adapted to this medium with 14 books worth of material there wasn’t a need to stray to far from it
They shouldn't stray too far from it, anyway. That would defeat the purpose.
@@berengerdietiker22 which is?
To adapt the source material faithfully. That's the whole point of film adaptations.
@@berengerdietiker22 first
No not really
Some movies take the idea and the plot but make an entire different thing out of them and it might turns out way better than the actual material ( tho definitely not usually does that happen )
Second I think the wolf's character in the movie was way better than the overly nice one from the book tbh that's one good change
Finally
Don't worry if it is about the whole alien thing they apparently are going to show it in the sequel they didn't add it in the first movie just because they felt it would be too crazy the audience might leave the theatres not knowing what the heck did they just see (which I also agree with them on tbh)
more details:
-the superpowers after they time travel
-milton
-everyone had a name change since all the characters names were also revealed in the books
-evil serpent thingy from series 2
MILTON NOOOOOO.
i just noticed they left milton out of the movie :(
@@galaxygirllilsis7807 ikr :(
Nobody's gonna talk about how the Butt-light which was actually just the meteorite thingy was a reference to Marmalade being an alien with too many Butts?
I prefer the movie versions of them especially Wolf his friends Diane Foxington Professor Marmalade being a full fleshed Guinea Pig and not an alien impersonating a guinea pig and I always liked the idea of Anthro Animals and Humans living in the same world especially The Sonic the Hedgehog Videogame Series.
I enjoyed reading the books with my little brother and was upset the books were not that known, but I’m glad they made a movie so people know this series more, also I’ve never seen a video about books vs movies so thx for this vid
(I like the books better)
Haha! They do always say that the book is better than the movie! I haven't been able to read the books or watch the movie, but I can't wait! I think the book looks really cool and creative from what I've seen so far! The movie seems like it's gonna be a lot different but still good! lol Yes! My goal is to read the books!
I love the book series but the worst part of the book series is that you have to read EVERY SINGLE BOOK FOR IT TO MAKE SENSE
And you aren’t wrong about that
a.k.a. every book ever, I mean I never read harry potter but if you read the 3rd book, it really wouldn't make sense. because you skipped the rest.
@@sentineleditz
I like the movie versions of The Harry Potter Series better.
Although I haven't seen the movie yet, it's become official: I'll like the movie better than the books.
It actually makes me so mad that most people don't even know that The Bad Guys was inspired by a book series.
the bad guys book is really good too
If DreamWorks ever plans on making a sequel for the Bad Guys movie, it should definitely include the part when Professor Marmalade reveals himself as a multi-butt alien.
With Diana's backstory
@@Cute-ic5jv
I keep the backstory of Diane's parents being killed but not the alien impersonating a guinea pig cause that's going a little too far and really gross the multiple butts nasty.
And they meet the International League of heroes
I read all the freaking books before they even THOUGHT of making a movie
Lol same
As a bad guys book lover, I can say I’m kinda weirded out by the design of the characters since they are so different
Relatable
I saw at the beginning of the book that wolf used snake as a grappling hook when snake ate prana after he insulted him in the cat scene
Only true legends remember legs
I’m surprised they gender swapped him despite the books having several unique females.
I enjoyed this movie, it had a unique plot. I even read the books to understand the movie.
For a person who was reading the books for years, I can definitely see the differences.
If you read the book before the movie you deserve an award
I’m kinda glad marmalade is a real guinea pig in the movie because him being an alien felt like the most unnecessary plot twist ever
Yeah I really hope he doesnt turn out to be an alien in the sequel
And has a more realistic goal
@@Bredkid96
Yeah glad you guys agree with that an Alien impersonating a guinea pig looks boring.
I like Wolf's design in the movie version too especially the others' and Anthro Animals and Humans coexisting in the same world too.
I didn't know that wolf is a *✨SMOOTH CRIMINAL ✨*
These are not butts. These are hands actually🤣🤣
00:39 gizmo from Teen Titans (2003)
First off, I thought about reading the books first, but then the drawings were so different from the animation of the movie. Also, it didn't look right in the book to me. Second, if the events of the story are different from the movie, how come they changed it in the movie? Shouldn't the events in the books stay as is in the movie? Not to mention some of the character changes. Why change some of their personalities, backgrounds, gender, and species?
Changes happen all of the time in adaptations. If I had a penny everytime I hated something people changed in the Sherlock Holmes canon for a adaptation, I'd be a billionaire. My salt aside, I do think that the changes in this adaptation are more well-thought out than the travesty people tend to do with my boy, especially considering that the source material is aimed towards younger children and big movie features try to target a wide audience with a variety of ages. I doubt 10 year olds would enjoy a too simplistic story on the screen, because it'd lack the action scenes with colors that get their attention.
Sometimes, differing completely from the source is fun. See Tangled for example. It still remains my favorite princess movie because it is so far off what Rapunzel always was about, it feels like a breath of fresh air even 12 years later
Also the change in species was adressed by one of the directors, who thought the stereotypes surrounding the animals made more sense if there were humans inventing them rather than other animals. It'd also help this movie stand out when compared to Zootopia, he said. I think the changes, though jarring, still have soul to them and are charming in their own way. They've changed a book in the past with How To Train Your Dragon and it was pretty good
@@herlocksholmes-uv5qw
And you can't adapt the whole story version of the book into a whole movie that would be boring.
Here are the differences I noticed
Rupert marmalade iv doesn’t wear a lab coat and only wears a mayor suit
Marmalade is an alien creature in the books but not in the movie
Mr piranha is a fish in the books but in the movie he has a body.
he said marmalade is an alein, it was literaly number1
@@Coraplayzzz I know I’m only saying the fifferences I think I know
I like that they changed webs to a woman for at least SOME representation for women nowadays 💀 it really fits her and she’s a great character overall.
I still find weird that the film went the route of making humans and anthro animals existing simultaneously, specially since there isn't even an explanation. If they were like "Hey, so the heart (butt) meteor that crashed on Earth kinda mutated some humans into animals", it would at least give it some context.
I was very disappointed that marmalade didn’t rip off his flesh suit to become an alien with butts for hands 😔
Apparently,, Mr. wolf only has the Michael Jackson outfit during the first Golden Dolphin heist in the movie.
This is a Pretty Good Video!! 👍
By the Way, Is there a Link or Any ways that I can Watch the Full Movie??
I feel like they just didn’t make the movie that good. It’s not at all like the book. Wolf is very confident and kinda stuck up in the movie but in the book he’s just so nice. It’s stupid how they did that
Ikr? It really bugs me that they changed Ellen to Diane, set it ina human world and not an animal world, and the fact that Wolfs fur is brown in the books, but in the movie, it’s gray.
Pirhana looks to humanoid, too.
At 1:46 tarantula is actually there, if you look around sharks arm you can see tarantula, just wanted to point out if you didn’t notice she’s there :)
Before the movie came out, I literally was expecting Mr. Wolf to be the wolf/judge from Sing 2
Yesh you aren’t the only one that notice.
4:20 So the butt heart scene in the movie was actually a reference to this.
Tanto la película como los libros son geniales, ahora tengo muchas ganas de leer los libros agradecida con dreamworks 😊
Another thing you missed is piranha doesn’t have a body. He is just a fish that can stand up straight
Did you know a reference in the book for the heart when marmalade was holding it actually meant to be a similarities to to help marmalade is supposed to be a representative of the bad guy who is an alien with me but when Snake called it a giant but that was no mistake.
Movie was really enjoyable and eye-catching. Would've kept it set in an animal world but it does make the main cast stand out.
people who haven't seen the bad guys movie see the intro
walks in movie theater and presses the badguys on netflix
tyty for this, God be w yall
OMGGGG yesssss I never read the books but while in the theater when they revealed the professor was evil and wanted the comet my first thought was 'Holy fuck is he an alien that came with the comet and took shape of the real professor'??? Because I thought the whole steal the charity money thing was too predictable. But nope, guess Dreamworks wanted to play it safe. It was still a good movie, and I wasn't expecting Mermalade to be the granny, that one DID take me off guard
Phew someone finally acknowledged the actual book
Man I grew up with the books
1:49 Is it just me or does Snake's disguise look very similar to a certain dictator in the 1930s - 1940s
One thing that I noticed in the book that I personally hate is that FOX IS THE ONE. Why isn’t wolf? He’s technically the main character and the first one introduced!
I love the books art style.
You miss one the piranha has legs in the movie but in the book he does not have legs
Ive been waiting for someone to make this
WOW! What a great video! Good job!
As much as I loved this movie, I feel that a lot of these changes were very drastic and unnecessary. Tiffany Fluffit in the movie broke my heart, as I’ve known her for so long in the books and she used to remind me a lot of Ann Gora from Swat Kats. I kept telling my mom “That’s not the Tiffany Fluffit I know!”. Even worse, I was worried that Agent Fox wasn’t going to be in the movie, as I saw no sign of her in the trailer, but of course they had to tweak her too. She’s barely even recognizable in the movie, and that’s very sad. There’s not even a single hint of the International League of Heroes.
And don’t even get me STARTED on that Guinea Pig thing. The second book in the series, Mission Unpluckable, was all about the gang sneaking in to save CHICKENS in the same way they did with the Guinea Pigs. That iconic scene where Snake eats all those Guinea Pigs and gets a swollen gut also happened in the book, but with chickens instead. He’s even called “The Chicken Swallower” in the book. They basically just took that chicken stuff and turned it right back around to make it Guinea Pigs.
My mom kept telling me that these changes were likely to avoid copyright issues with the books’ publisher. It’s even more sad since the writer of the books, Aaron Blabey, was involved in the movie (You see his name in the credits).
PLEASE don’t get the idea that I hated this movie, because I loved it. It’s just the drastic changes that I wasn’t a fan of. The character design changes were honestly amazing! I didn’t mind the fact that they anthropomorphized Piranha, because he still looked great and they even made an effort to make his colors look like an actual Piranha!
All and all, I do love this movie a lot, but I just wish that they didn’t change so much.
Finally someone who knows about the book!
one thing I loved about the adaption is how I feel like the creators of the film actually read the books. Like sure a bunch of stuff changed but there were so many detailed references:
the butt rock to represent Marmalade being a butt alien in the book, legs/webs calling Wolf “wolfie”, and heck, they even chose to play “fly me to the moon”, which is literally a chapter name in which the gang travels to the moon to destroy the cute-zilla ray :00
Also is no one gonna talk about how snake also went to the dark side 😭😭
I think tiffanys last name was what it is as an easter egg to her book version
the movie seems to be this very loose adaptation of the book, like an alternative universe, and i like this approach of adaptation as the movie lovers and book lovers both have something unique to love and the overlap makes it even more satisfying knowing the common scenes, but there are a lot of differences that are kinda sad to see
Mr. wolf also had had a salesman personality in the books
In my opinion, the movie is much better than the books because the books look like horror books.
I’m a big fan of the books and the movie I just watched it
Personally I think the cat version of Tiffany might have been a whole lot better. Changing Mr. Tarantula to Miss Tarantula was a good choice. Probably a realistic looking spider wouldn't have made such a great screen character. Hopefully we'll see the International League of Heroes in the sequel.
Me too
0:26 finally! Someone pointed it out!
Yes ive seen da movie, it’s EVERYTHING! Sadness, anger, betrayal, EVERYTHING! And yes tarantula changed ALOT
I’ve actually read almost all of the books. Tho i havent seen the film. I got kinda choked when i saw a trailer for the movie. It was pretty unexpected.
Where can i find the movie?
I know its in the theaters
I already noticed EVERYTHING I was like what Tiffany is a a HUMAN?!
Hot take smooth criminal should have been played in the movie lol
Where can you watch it
You Miss One Different: In The Books, Mr Wolf Had A Crush On Agent Fox. But In The Film, Mr Wolf Didn't Had A Crush On Diane. Instead He Smitten On Her.
Where did you watch it, I can't find it anywhere
I read the 1st book before the movie came out And I didn't know there was a tarantula character🤨😁
Movie came out!?!!!!?
Please tell me what the movie is on so I can watch it I’ve been reeding there books for two years
Alien? Looks like I saw this video too early. Where this was revealed? Can't wait for sequel.
Yo
Great video
The movie only takes place until book 4 so Marmalade probably still IS secretly an alien and if they do the same number of books the sequel will take place books 5-8, so in like 2/4 of the sequel movie he will be revealed as an alien.
Bro! I knew this movie reminded me of something, i completely forgot about the bookkekwokwjsns s s, i literally loved it as a small kid
where did you guys watch it??
he truly is a "smooth criminal"
I personally like both book and movie :)
Is it on Paramount plus Netflix on demand
I wish you would have said something about the changes with the characters that wasn't wolf
At cat rescue tarantula is on sharks shoulder
Number 1 should be that fact that they had super powers in the book
Wait what?! (Btw I haven’t read the books)
They did? I m trying to find the episode 4 online but can't find any 😓
So, Wolf used to basically be a cross between Leslie Knope and Michael Scott?
4:16 I love the way he says it has a lot of butts I laughed sooo hard TYSM
Cool vid yo
Wait.. What about piranha? Well, he’s a fish but out of all water it’s agua dulce and he went to toilet water?
The big bad Wolf once he robbed a bank be like: *you've been hit by a smooth criminal*
Interesting and cool vid. I watched the movie; it was good. Also I may have to read that book sometime.
Miss tarantula was Mr. tarantula in the book
You Know, Your Voice Actually Sounds Like Mr. Wolf With A Little High Pitch Voice At The Start Of The Video.
Number one. The mr.wolf has heart pink underpants 😂