WINNERS AND LOSERS FROM NHL 2024 TRADE DEADLINE

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ก.ย. 2024
  • WHO WON THE 2024 NHL TRADE DEADLINE?!? COMMENT BELOW!!
    Donate to Patrik Laine's mental health pledge at the link below:
    e.givesmart.co...
    Check out my social!
    TH-cam: Undrafted Hockey Fan
    TikTok: @undraftedhockeyfan
    Twitter: @undrftdhckeyfan

ความคิดเห็น • 10

  • @moneydynamicmatanya9541
    @moneydynamicmatanya9541 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You used the wrong Logo for the Coyotes lol Also no shot you put the Canucks at Big Loser Tier.

    • @undraftedhockeyfan
      @undraftedhockeyfan  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Still is a coyotes logo! Also, the Canucks picked up Lindholm and he’s not looking like a good fit. Seven points in 17 games isn’t what you wanted for what they paid. Also, they missed out on Guentzal so big loss from them

    • @moneydynamicmatanya9541
      @moneydynamicmatanya9541 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@undraftedhockeyfan That’s because of cap issues.

    • @nameless_no_name
      @nameless_no_name 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@undraftedhockeyfan Gentzel is injured and who knows how that rental works out. Gentzel has not scored one point yet because he is injured, nor has he gelled with his players and that might take time considering he has never played on any other team or lived in any other NHL city other than the Pit.
      Lindholm has been getting better each game. You likely know that Swedes seem to always take time to adjust. His wife and kids JUST made it to VanCity a week ago-think about how disruptive that is. We have plenty of time for Lindholm to get up to speed for the playoffs.
      Also Zadorov has been looking good. "Big loser" suggests that one is not looking at the parts and looking at things pretty superficially.

    • @undraftedhockeyfan
      @undraftedhockeyfan  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nameless_no_name I agree about Guentzal but the fact that cheap Carolina owners advised going out and getting him shows they are serious which is not something they have shown the last couple years.
      For the Trade deadline, I put big loser but standings and performances throughout the season have been phenomenal for Vancouver. But for the assets they gave up for Lindholm, I expected it more of him.

    • @nameless_no_name
      @nameless_no_name 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@undraftedhockeyfan I think Vancity expects more.... but regular season is not why he was bought. I think Trader Jim is one of the solid Pres/GMs with a proven history... We'll see on Lindholm. Zadorov is looking very good for the Nucks

  • @JoeUber
    @JoeUber 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Agreed with the Canucks choice, they reeeeeaaaalllly should've got at least one or two guys, could've put Myers in LTIR or traded him, plus a few other changes could've been done.

  • @nameless_no_name
    @nameless_no_name 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lindholme makes the Nucks have the strongest spine in hockey. They should have cheated and stole like Vegas, like Tampa, like and Chicago have done in the past and manipulated the LTIR for Myers and maybe Joshua. They could have picked up Toffoli and Tanev, and signed Kessel.
    Think about it:
    forwards:
    Miller, Boeser, EP40= loaded up dominant Lotto Line
    Toffoli, Lindholm, Hogie = potential scary good punch with guys who can/have scored 40/30/20 goals ( with responsible D sensibilities)
    Joshua, Garland, Blueger = Best 3rd line in hockey before Joshua got hurt
    Mikheyev (you know this dude is going to break out any second) Suter, Lafferty (speed, with D sensibilities, and can score if you are not on your toes)
    back ups incase of injury or switches:
    PDG, Pods
    Defense
    Huges and Tanev
    Hronik and Sousi
    Myers Zadorov
    Back-ups to injury or switches
    Cole
    Juulsen
    Demko DeSmith

    • @undraftedhockeyfan
      @undraftedhockeyfan  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's what I am saying! A 2nd and 3rd rounder for Toffoli is totally a piece that Vancouver could have done. Plus adding Tanev would have been electric! I expected ownership to get so excited about being good that they would go all in.