I don’t like this explanation: it would be fundamental to state that Newton laws are refered to inertial frame of reference, whilst D’alembert is refered to non inertial (accelerated) frames of reference. Taking this into account, leads you to the understanding of the issue, otherwise is just playing with equations.
You are correct that the reference frame is an important consideration when discussing the laws of motion. Newton's laws of motion are indeed based on inertial frames of reference, which are frames that are not accelerating relative to each other. In contrast, D'Alembert's principle is based on non-inertial frames of reference, which are frames that are accelerating relative to each other. When we apply Newton's laws of motion in an accelerating frame of reference, we need to introduce fictitious forces (such as the centrifugal force or Coriolis force) to account for the acceleration. On the other hand, D'Alembert's principle eliminates the need for these fictitious forces by considering the total force acting on a system in an accelerating frame to be zero. Therefore, when considering the motion of objects in different reference frames, it is important to take into account whether the frame is inertial or non-inertial. This distinction can help us understand the underlying principles of the laws of motion and their application in different situations.
I don’t like this explanation: it would be fundamental to state that Newton laws are refered to inertial frame of reference, whilst D’alembert is refered to non inertial (accelerated) frames of reference. Taking this into account, leads you to the understanding of the issue, otherwise is just playing with equations.
You are correct that the reference frame is an important consideration when discussing the laws of motion. Newton's laws of motion are indeed based on inertial frames of reference, which are frames that are not accelerating relative to each other. In contrast, D'Alembert's principle is based on non-inertial frames of reference, which are frames that are accelerating relative to each other.
When we apply Newton's laws of motion in an accelerating frame of reference, we need to introduce fictitious forces (such as the centrifugal force or Coriolis force) to account for the acceleration. On the other hand, D'Alembert's principle eliminates the need for these fictitious forces by considering the total force acting on a system in an accelerating frame to be zero.
Therefore, when considering the motion of objects in different reference frames, it is important to take into account whether the frame is inertial or non-inertial. This distinction can help us understand the underlying principles of the laws of motion and their application in different situations.
woahh your explaining skills are amazing . Understood the topic clearly, thanks a lot Jai Shri Ram
Understood....
Thanks a lot
Glad it helped
Which course are you into? What are the next topics you wish to see on this channel?
Thanks
Welcome
Will you please upload a video of the proof of d Alembert's principle? Asap
Nice
Glad to help! Which course are you into? What are the next topics you wish to see in our channel?
Not a great explanation, should’ve been in much more depth
Thanks
Welcome