NSF GRFP tips from a reviewer and PI

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 25

  • @concernedroadrat
    @concernedroadrat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Thank you for this video, Professor Lipomi! It is actually nice to hear such encouragement from someone who did not end up receiving this award but by all metrics went on to still become very successful.

    • @djlipomi
      @djlipomi  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad it was helpful!

  • @M16xDr0pSh0tz
    @M16xDr0pSh0tz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I am not even pursuing a PhD but I could listen to this guy talk for hours. Perfect mix of professionalism and nonchalance (ie hard ass reviewers - lol). I'm sure your students are lucky to have you.

    • @djlipomi
      @djlipomi  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks!

  • @mdsaifurrahman5376
    @mdsaifurrahman5376 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for this short tutorial on NSF GRFP, Professor Lipomi!
    Tips are really helpful, as I am preparing for NSF GRFP

  • @MrHowbout
    @MrHowbout 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Thanks for breaking this down! I was feeling a little overwhelmed by the whole process. Much obliged professor.

    • @djlipomi
      @djlipomi  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sure! Spread the word :)

  • @coffee_mouth
    @coffee_mouth 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Post-bac going for 2nd application cycle - thanks for the guidance and insight!

  • @aetobatus
    @aetobatus 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thank you! This was really helpful.

    • @djlipomi
      @djlipomi  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great to hear! Good luck in your application.

  • @Lucas-Sutorus
    @Lucas-Sutorus 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you Dr. Lipomi!

    • @djlipomi
      @djlipomi  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hey Lucas, of course! I hope you're doing well.

  • @joshramer7
    @joshramer7 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you, Professor Lipomi, for being an excellent resource for NSF-GRSP applicants...
    You discussed having 1-2 figures and were explicit about the first type of figure. Is there a second recommended figure type or something that you found visually appealing in applications?

  • @TheFall0fSummer
    @TheFall0fSummer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you for delineating the process, this video was really helpful!

  • @sarahl8004
    @sarahl8004 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks Darren. I have just submitted my application and I've got my fingers crossed! I was wondering - how important are tables and figures? I am between undergrad and graduate school (working) and I've not done any preliminary studies that would produce data on my research proposal. Are 2 full pages of text frowned upon by reviewers?

  • @brandomiranda6703
    @brandomiranda6703 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Advice on broader impact?

  • @PaulScotti
    @PaulScotti 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This was very helpful, thanks!

  • @cloudgalaxy9231
    @cloudgalaxy9231 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very helpful. Thank you.

  • @js8936
    @js8936 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, could you explain how I can do a molecular modification on Gromacs? Thx prof

  • @dpm1004
    @dpm1004 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is awesome. Thank you so much!!

  • @matanshtepel1230
    @matanshtepel1230 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    super helpful! thanks!

  • @WordsworthAugustine-t8e
    @WordsworthAugustine-t8e 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Flatley Crest

  • @BerkeleyHaley-q7k
    @BerkeleyHaley-q7k 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hudson Bridge

  • @bulldogmadhav5762
    @bulldogmadhav5762 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It’s probably just a waste of time for most people to even bother at least without a publication

    • @djlipomi
      @djlipomi  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Applications are divided into 3 pools and applicants are compared against each other: senior undergrads, 1st year grads, and 2nd year grads. Senior undergraduates are not likely to have a paper by the time they submit their applications in October of their senior years. For applicants applying in their second year of grad school, I would agree it would be difficult to stand out without a paper. First year grad students are somewhere in the middle, but not having a paper would be a tougher sell, though posters and senior design projects can make up for it.