Rob suggest that the Chicago photo was not the results of atmospheric refraction - in his own mind. He did not explain how the sunset can be observed twice nor why the bottoms of ALL objects disappear below the horizon from bottom up including the Sun and the Moon and the stars. He offered no answers. He offered only personal opinions which were not supported by scientific evidence. Common sense is only useful if the conditions are understood. Rod guesses and offers personal opinions from ignorance. Common sense does not work in such cases. He seems to think that his camera magnifies 83x although that is the RANGE of the Lens and not how much the skyline is magnified. Of course, Rod did not have the knowledge that we have today of space tourist returning to Earth having images captured by their own cell phones which clearly indicate that Earth cannot be flat. I am really surprised when Skiba used the yoga instructor as a reference when the yoga instructor also claims on his own web pages that Jesus never existed and that Christianity is nothing more than a conspiracy. The "perspective" claims in this video make little sense when applied to the flat earth beliefs. For example, the Sun and the Moon remain the same angular size during the day although the distances to them change. If the Sun and Moon were "local" and "small" then there should be a very noticeable change. I have yet to come across any flat earth explanation for these observations of the Sun and of the Moon. It is interesting that this video uses a video of Walter Lewin has been cherry picked while his other papers and lectures clearly shows us that he knew Earth is not flat. It is very easy for anybody to use the latency of ham radio waves to estimate the size and distance to the Moon. None of those estimates ever match any claims offered by the flat earth community but they do match what is offered by mainstream science. Why is this fact ignored and not addressed by the flat earth community? Bottom line: Rob did not offer evidence which would indicate that tens of thousands of mainstream scientist are wrong. Rob did not offer any reason for why we should assume that Earth is flat if it could be shown that Earth does not have the curvature as predicted by mainstream science. No evidence was presented in this video which would indicate that Earth must be flat. What evidence indicates that Earth must be flat? The flat earth community offers no answers.
Rob suggest that the Chicago photo was not the results of atmospheric refraction - in his own mind. He did not explain how the sunset can be observed twice nor why the bottoms of ALL objects disappear below the horizon from bottom up including the Sun and the Moon and the stars. He offered no answers. He offered only personal opinions which were not supported by scientific evidence. Common sense is only useful if the conditions are understood. Rod guesses and offers personal opinions from ignorance. Common sense does not work in such cases. He seems to think that his camera magnifies 83x although that is the RANGE of the Lens and not how much the skyline is magnified. Of course, Rod did not have the knowledge that we have today of space tourist returning to Earth having images captured by their own cell phones which clearly indicate that Earth cannot be flat.
I am really surprised when Skiba used the yoga instructor as a reference when the yoga instructor also claims on his own web pages that Jesus never existed and that Christianity is nothing more than a conspiracy.
The "perspective" claims in this video make little sense when applied to the flat earth beliefs. For example, the Sun and the Moon remain the same angular size during the day although the distances to them change. If the Sun and Moon were "local" and "small" then there should be a very noticeable change. I have yet to come across any flat earth explanation for these observations of the Sun and of the Moon. It is interesting that this video uses a video of Walter Lewin has been cherry picked while his other papers and lectures clearly shows us that he knew Earth is not flat.
It is very easy for anybody to use the latency of ham radio waves to estimate the size and distance to the Moon. None of those estimates ever match any claims offered by the flat earth community but they do match what is offered by mainstream science. Why is this fact ignored and not addressed by the flat earth community?
Bottom line: Rob did not offer evidence which would indicate that tens of thousands of mainstream scientist are wrong. Rob did not offer any reason for why we should assume that Earth is flat if it could be shown that Earth does not have the curvature as predicted by mainstream science. No evidence was presented in this video which would indicate that Earth must be flat.
What evidence indicates that Earth must be flat?
The flat earth community offers no answers.
Who cares...round...flat..triangle. Doesn't seem very important.