Understanding APSK and QAM

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 47

  • @KrampflOtto
    @KrampflOtto 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    This is one of the best explanations out there! Thank you!

  • @darktemplari0
    @darktemplari0 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for the explanations guys, I´ll give it good use. Rohde Schwarz you earned my appreciation.

    • @pauldenisowski
      @pauldenisowski 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks! Appreciate the feedback!

  • @Nonchalant2023
    @Nonchalant2023 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Rohde & Schwarz provides better education than my university lol, my classes were like explaining the turbo encabulator now it is so much clearer ++ Thanks

    • @pauldenisowski
      @pauldenisowski 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks! We try :)

  • @joe_ey2173
    @joe_ey2173 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for the understandable and compact wrap up of the topic! Also the comparison between (A)PSK and QAM really helped me to better understand the topic. Cheers.

    • @pauldenisowski
      @pauldenisowski 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad it was helpful - thanks for the feedback!

  • @pradeep0037
    @pradeep0037 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Kudos to you on a great presentation. You basically covered the essence of Digital communications subject in my undergrad school. Please keep it coming. Thank you.

  • @balamuralikrishna6082
    @balamuralikrishna6082 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This kind of explanation is required for proper understating of the concept . Thanks for such great explanation.

    • @pauldenisowski
      @pauldenisowski 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks - appreciate the feedback!

  • @arenaengineering8070
    @arenaengineering8070 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Simple and straightforward in general terms.
    Thank.

  • @HelmutTschemernjak
    @HelmutTschemernjak 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thanks for this great explanation of the basics, very helpful.
    Regards from Hannover/Germany, Danke.

  • @yz250ftony
    @yz250ftony 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I work with QAM equipment. Repairing, tuning, and bench testing. Watching the constellation during testing is cool to see live. This technology goes back decades but is still widely used today for cable internet. For sending large amounts of data through copper, this is primary. Fiber is superior, but even that is converted to QAM for coax. ATX, Broadband International, Scientific Atlanta and Arris still manufacture QAM amplifiers. In the beginning, the bandwidth ranged 54-330mhz, then to 450(i think), 550, 750, 860/870, 1,000, and now we're at 1.2hgz. GHZ doesn't play nice with coax over long runs, so eventually to keep up with data rate demands, either the modulation will change, coax will change, or everything goes to fiber. Great presentation!

  • @AD_Dongre
    @AD_Dongre 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great ...Love from India🇮🇳

  • @zonglehuang4147
    @zonglehuang4147 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks a lot. This video has saved me much time.

  • @CliveReyes
    @CliveReyes 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Very clear and informative. Thanks.
    Would love to hear more about the Crest factor (PAPR).

    • @pauldenisowski
      @pauldenisowski 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I actually am planning on a video on this very topic (CF / PAPR) as well as another video on crest factor reduction - stay tuned!

    • @CliveReyes
      @CliveReyes 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pauldenisowski Fantastic! You earned my subscription.

  • @sawanbhattacharyya3789
    @sawanbhattacharyya3789 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    straight to point thanks

  • @tingoyeh4903
    @tingoyeh4903 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You save my day again, thanks.

  • @dirkl9652
    @dirkl9652 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very clear and precise explaination. Thx

  • @panduwilantara3070
    @panduwilantara3070 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    great

  • @harshpreetsingh1228
    @harshpreetsingh1228 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice presentation

  • @kozhenidres314
    @kozhenidres314 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    it was so informative , thank you alot , what is the name of the playlist than contain this video ?

    • @Rohde-Schwarz
      @Rohde-Schwarz  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you very much! You can find the playlist here:
      th-cam.com/play/PLKxVoO5jUTlvsVtDcqrVn0ybqBVlLj2z8.html
      Test & Measurement Fundamentals.
      All the best, R&S Social Media Team

  • @sirac19
    @sirac19 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thx a lot

    • @pauldenisowski
      @pauldenisowski 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      My pleasure - thanks for the feedback!

  • @JonaTheLegend
    @JonaTheLegend 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the video - What does it mean when there are two extra symbols on a 64QAM measurement? I've noticed there are two symbols with 0 and 180 degree phase on every 802.11g measurement I do.

    • @pauldenisowski
      @pauldenisowski 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Two symbols 180 degrees apart is BPSK (binary phase shift keying). In 802.11g the subcarriers can be modulated with different modulation orders: BPSK, QPSK, 16QAM or 64QAM. So the signal you're looking at has some subcarriers that are modulated with 64QAM and some that are modulated with BPSK. Please see the video "Understanding Phase Shift Keying" for more details on BSPK - thanks!

    • @JonaTheLegend
      @JonaTheLegend 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pauldenisowski Thanks for the reply. I looked at the settings on my SPA and it turns out it was called the pilot signal, which I think is the underlying carrier wave.

    • @pauldenisowski
      @pauldenisowski 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@JonaTheLegend The pilot signals in 802.11are special subcarriers used to estimate and correct for variations in amplitude and phase caused by the channel and are usually present, so that makes sense. :)

    • @Rohde-Schwarz
      @Rohde-Schwarz  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      👍

  • @TheHiphopgems
    @TheHiphopgems 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't understand how you get the number of bits at 2:00

    • @user-rf4li7fc7p
      @user-rf4li7fc7p 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      number of bits = log2( modulation order )

  • @asdrty258
    @asdrty258 ปีที่แล้ว

    Qam or qfm is the thing #ofdm

  • @DonnaMartin-u3j
    @DonnaMartin-u3j หลายเดือนก่อน

    Garcia Patricia Robinson Paul Perez Anthony

  • @KhanTena-t8z
    @KhanTena-t8z 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Williams Kenneth Walker Jose Clark Paul

  • @JacquelynBell-q2b
    @JacquelynBell-q2b 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Martinez Paul Rodriguez Sharon Garcia Betty

  • @SharonDavis-v6n
    @SharonDavis-v6n หลายเดือนก่อน

    Clark Ruth Robinson Donald Lewis Maria

  • @lixiang7349
    @lixiang7349 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why bother creating the word among when between is used for greater than two anyway.

  • @MelissaWilliams-o4y
    @MelissaWilliams-o4y หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wilson Daniel Wilson Michael Johnson Betty

  • @JacquelynBell-q2b
    @JacquelynBell-q2b 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Moore Melissa Clark Christopher Anderson Jennifer