Excellent video! Thanks bro. Is the PTC Creo the best 3D CAD software now? Can you help by saying shortly how OnShape compares with PTC Creo in terms of Parametric modeling and stress/strain simulation/modeling?
@@theemptyatom CREO has a steep learning curve compared to Solidworks. Several of CREO's advanced features make it difficult to learn for users who are new to CAD. CREO is the best choice when its high-end features, such as topology, optimization, mold design, surfacing, and simulations, are needed.
This was awesome! I've been using Creo (Pro/E) since 1989 and it feels good to learn some new stuff. I had forgotten about TRAJPAR and how useful it can be. When working through this on my own, I approached it a bit differently. When doing the first sketch, before completing it, I converted it to a spline so that the curve was one segment. I then created the points along the curve using a ratio. I also created a datum plane through the point and normal to the curve. I used that to drive my X-trajectory on the sweep. That way the weave was always normal to the first curve. By doing that, I could use one pattern for the sides, curve, and base. Instead of the three separate patterns. Also, to make the alternate weave, after creating the first weave, I created a pattern of two and "unpatterned" it. I then just changed the relation in the sketch to sd4=1*cos((trajpar*360*10)+180). Anyway, awesome tutorial and will be subscribing.
Thaliva am your big fan . Thanks ❤
Sir, the vertical dimension (increment dimension 2) isn't showing after grouping and patterning.
its an awesome, I have been doing Cad modeling since 17 years, still i got to learn a lot of things
Sir 21:10 pe o segment main select nehin ho raha he kese karen
Dimension didn't appear while pattern of ribs along dimension. Please explain how to show dims.
All the steps are explained neatly in the video. Go through the video step by step slowly. You will get the result.
Excellent video! Thanks bro. Is the PTC Creo the best 3D CAD software now? Can you help by saying shortly how OnShape compares with PTC Creo in terms of Parametric modeling and stress/strain simulation/modeling?
the same as Solidworks, but SW is stronger on the drawing end than CREO imho.
@@theemptyatom CREO has a steep learning curve compared to Solidworks. Several of CREO's advanced features make it difficult to learn for users who are new to CAD. CREO is the best choice when its high-end features, such as topology, optimization, mold design, surfacing, and simulations, are needed.
@@DigiSculptStudio I have been using CAD since it has existed basically.
@@theemptyatom Alright, but the internet disagrees with you. I did not type the response. this is the consensus i got from many many sites.
@@DigiSculptStudio Lol okay. Logical fallacy much?
Kindly create you complete PRO E toutorial from beginner to expert. If you have kindly share plate form with me i am ready to buy it.
Hi Could you please make Pro/program and Drawing program tutorial videos..?
Для полного раскрытия темы нужно было ещё расход проволоки посчитать)
Your creativity is very unique sir. Thank u sir.
Now got the point where it was missing. I was using creo 3.
Make plastic fruit crate in Creo parametric
god blass you
good very nice
Sir, it would be great if you explain the working of the complicated techniques
This was awesome! I've been using Creo (Pro/E) since 1989 and it feels good to learn some new stuff. I had forgotten about TRAJPAR and how useful it can be. When working through this on my own, I approached it a bit differently. When doing the first sketch, before completing it, I converted it to a spline so that the curve was one segment. I then created the points along the curve using a ratio. I also created a datum plane through the point and normal to the curve. I used that to drive my X-trajectory on the sweep. That way the weave was always normal to the first curve. By doing that, I could use one pattern for the sides, curve, and base. Instead of the three separate patterns. Also, to make the alternate weave, after creating the first weave, I created a pattern of two and "unpatterned" it. I then just changed the relation in the sketch to sd4=1*cos((trajpar*360*10)+180).
Anyway, awesome tutorial and will be subscribing.