I have a doubt regarding 17:20 that if the induced emf is such that it opposes the change in flux at that 'instant' then why does the phasor diagram of electrical machines represent the phasors of induced emfs 'always' opposing their causes (applied voltages)
![CAMPปลิ้น | EP.83[1/2] เปิดแคมป์หลอนต้อนรับ 2 ตัวพ่อแห่งวงการผี!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2uPuHYHgwiI/mqdefault.jpg)
![ILLSLICK - THE KING'S LANDING [Freestyle]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/feIJJnNkTfk/mqdefault.jpg)
My dream professor. i would be very lucky if I get to meet his legacy once in my life. IIT KGP please help me to meet him.
Me too bro......
I have a doubt regarding 17:20 that if the induced emf is such that it opposes the change in flux at that 'instant' then why does the phasor diagram of electrical machines represent the phasors of induced emfs 'always' opposing their causes (applied voltages)
All fine..
You need to study all again slowly
lenz law, but he says lunches law,,,sorry , just opinion ,
It's not Lenz law. It's Lenz's law.
@@Richa_cute ok
But why lunches law? He says
@@transientmatter6088 bro he didn't say lunches. Either you don't know english or just trolling around.
@@Richa_cute indians know englisb than me?
@@transientmatter6088 yes. Your sentence has a grammatical mistake. Now you can leave and focus on english first!