Very well researched video. As a Romanian, thank you. His castle is intact, beautiful and can be visited. I am looking foreward for the video on his son, Matei
I'm just very thankful for all the border land Christian nations, Hungary and Romania kept their freedom and their faith, and fought for truth and justice before it became fashionable to do so.
@@85szabolcs u realize that he was half Romanian,and he didn`t said that because we where consider peasants by some mongols thats why!! ;) ohh and matia was made with a Romanian woman that changed her name!!!
He is a key figure of the Hungarian history and that of the wider region. He was an excellent strategist and diplomat, who became nevetheless also the largest landowner of Hungary. There is a new international TV show just presented in October in Cannes called the Rise of the Raven , we expect it to be available to watch from Spring 2025. The creators were very thoughtfull in trying to present the era including the various languages spoken by characters as documentaristic as possible. We will see how they managed soon, the trailer looks impressive.
I just watched the trailer The fighting scenes looked very "Hollywood" (not realistic) with the "heroes" fighting in full armour but without helmet and with perfect hair in the midst of battle... You can leave most of your armour at home, but never your helmet. Even the lowest peasants had some kind of head protection.
@@guycalabrese4040 not sure if that was the case in Central Eastern Europe and Balkans for those who were not mercenaries, but simple serfs from Balkans. Please note, these campaigns were multiethnic from armour to weapons used varied based on the region. It will be easier to validate when you see which battle is depicted- Belgrade, Varna etc etc.
The truth is that no one knows Hunyadi's exact origins, no one knows what his mother tongue was or what language his parents spoke, and we don't even know what nationality Hunyadi considered himself to be. In the Middle Ages, this was not as important as it is today, but a few things are certain: Hunyadi was the governor of Magyarorszűg, then its captain-in-chief, and he fought for Hungary as a Hungarian nobleman. All the rest is speculation and shouldn't be dealt with, but for some reason Romanians can't let go of this atheme. On such a basis, one could also deal with the fact that Mihály Vitéz was of Greek origin, but interestingly, under the videos related to him, the Romanians do not write that Mihály Vitáz was not even Romanian. A joke.
Janos Hunyadi for a Hungarian or Jancu the son of Voicu, was born around the today city of Hunedoara. I grew up in the village Racastia and then in the city proper Hunedoara. The whole county Hunedoara is a very old land that belonged to the Dacians occupied by Roman armies after 106 AD. The Castle was built on a old Dacian fortress. Jancu served the Hungarian king and he NEVER did anything good for his Vlach people. Mattias, his son forgot that he was half Vlah or Romanian he married into the Hungarian nobility and stopped speaking Vlach, latin.
These are fairy tales and historical falsifications invented by Romanians like Daniel Roxin, so 0.1% is based on reality! In reality, there never was a Hunyadi named Iancu, these are the invented names of the great Romanian history falsifiers like Nicolae Iorga, because it is true that the Serbs and Croats called Hunyadi Jankó, but they were never called that way in the Hungarian kingdom, and no such name is known from the Hunyadi archives! The Romanians faked his name from this Croatian Jankó to make it seem more Romanian than the name of Avram Iancu! Even 150 years ago, the majority of Romanians had not heard much about the Hunyadi people, they didn't even know who János Hunyadi and King Mátyás were! But the Romanian intellectuals knew, and they were very disturbed that the Hunyadi name became famous throughout Europe and that they were included among the greatest heroes of the world, and the main problem was that they were the Hungarian rulers! Because these references were all much later writings, which were often spread by the enemies of King Matthias, and therefore it is quite possible that they were not true! But what we know for sure is that János Hunyadi's father was already a Catholic noble, because in the Hungarian kingdom only Catholic nobles could receive land and property, this was required by law! Based on the latest research, Hunyadi János was also born in Kolozsvár, and then it is understandable why his wife gave birth to his younger son, Mátyás, in the same royal city, because at that time it was the most developed center in the Eastern Hungarian kingdom! It also turned out that there is no contemporary information that the Vajk whom King Sigismund awarded with the county of Hunyad was really János's father! Posterity considered Vajk to be the father of János Hunyadi because two chroniclers in the time of King Matthias hinted that János's father might have come from Valachia?! Thuróczy János claims that he is "nobili et claro Transalpinae gentis de gremio natus erat", i.e. he comes from a noble and notable family from Transalpina, and that Zsigmond brought his father from there to his own country, but he adds: "fertur", that is, that's what they say, so you don't know from a reliable source! However, neither these chroniclers nor even King Matthias himself ever mentioned that his grandfather was called Woyk or Vajk! On the other hand, everyone is deeply silent about the fact that since then King Ulászló's certificate has also been found, in which he probably writes the following about Hunyadi János, who became her greatest general: "Joannes, filius Vajvode de Verebel." And this is also very interesting, because no one disputes that in the certificates "Petrus, filius Georgii de Vereb" or "Petrus Vajvode de Verebel" was the voivode Verebélyi Péter of Transylvania! And who became the voivode of Transylvania a few years later, but Hunyadi János?! Historians are silent about the fact that this Verebélyi family also has the raven in its coat of arms, and it looks like only these two great noble families in Hungary at that time had the raven in their coat of arms! For the Verebélyi family, the raven was by all accounts a reference to their origin, as it also turned out that there was a settlement called Hollós, which was their property and where a Hollósvár built by their ancestors could have existed! According to contemporary data, King Sigismund donated this settlement together with Kikinda to Hagymás László, and in an interesting way Hagymás sold it to Hunyadi János! Could it be that Hunyadi bought this settlement because he knew very well that his ancestors came from there?! It is also very interesting that nobody wanted to take this seriously, that the Italian chronicler of King Matthias, Antonio Bonfini, took the name "Corvinus" from the name of the Hungarian settlement of Hollós, because the name of the raven is corvus in Latin, but it was also written as corvinus in Roman times, from which Bonfini also derived a fictitious Roman origin. But the most likely data is what Bonfini could have taken from King Matthias himself, when he writes: "Mátyás Corvin, born to the father of János Hollós Hunyadi, took the first of his first names from the castle of Hunyad in the farthest part of Transylvania, and the other from the village in which he born." And here Bonfini was probably thinking of King Matthias' paternal ancestors. No matter how we take it, Bonfini clearly describes that King Matthias took his second given name, Corvin, Hollós in Hungarian, from the village Hollós, where his ancestors probably came from! According to the unmistakable words of King László V's often mentioned certificate of 1453, Hunyadi's ancestors received the right to use the coat of arms thanks to the grace of the Hungarian kings! This made it clear that their right to use the coat of arms did not start with his father, but much longer, which again contradicts the fact that Vajk was Hunyadi's father! However, we know very well about the family of "Vajk son of the Serb" that they did not use any coat of arms, at least no description of this has yet been found, so it is quite possible that they were really Cumans or Vlachs from Wallachia, who then disappeared in the storm of history, and János Hunyadi probably either received it from the king or bought their estates! And then this explains why King Matthias never wrote about his grandfather named Vajk, and also why the people of Hollós and Hunyadi had the right to use the ancient Hungarian coat of arms! Because it is certain that already in the first half of the 15th century, Hunyadi became the owner of the entire county of Hunyad, which is already mentioned as Huniad in the 1256 papal charter, and the town and the earthen castle where the castle of the Hunyadis was later built, as "Hungnod" and "Huniad", and it was never called Hunedoara until the 20th century! And this is certainly a name with an ancient Hungarian meaning, which was already written down from the 13th century, but it is probably much older! And I am writing this only because the Romanians also falsified the origin of this name, because they say that it has always been Hunedoara, only the Hungarians Hungarianized all ancient Romanian names! All these data also prove that the name and origin of Hunyadi János was already tried to be muddied and falsified during the time of King Matthias, but especially after Matthias's death, because more and more people have been doing this ever since, and if you think about how many enemies they already had in their lives too, then it's no wonder! Anyway, no one is talking about the fact that the genetic research taken from the bones of King Matthias's son and two grandsons also proved that the ancestors of the Hunyadi's had more ancient Avar and Hungarian genes from the Carpathian basin, and had nothing to do with the Balkan Vlachs! The other problem that contradicts Hunyadi's Romanian origin is the repeated betrayal of the Vlachs, who betrayed Hunyadi János several times in different battles, but later also his son King Mátyás, and this also proves that they were hated because they were Hungarians!
The problem is that the Romanians are misled about the ethnogenesis of the Hungarians, without even knowing that the Hungarian chroniclers of the Middle Ages wrote about the multi-millenary ethnogenesis of the Magors-Hungarians, which begins with Nemrot - Nimrod, who was the first king in the world and who had two sons, Hunor and Magor, from whom came the Scythians called Huns and Magyars! Foreign chroniclers also wrote about them, and historians agree that this mythology is much more ancient than the mythology of European peoples in general. The difference between mythologies like "Romulus and Remus" and the mythology with "Hunor and Magor" is huge, not only in time and space, but also as cultural ethnogenesis, because Hunor and Magor always lived in brotherhood, and sought peace between peoples , they never went to war with each other, but their peoples were never in conflict either! The authors of Antiquity also wrote about Magor, but it also appears in the Bible as Magog. Titus Flavius Iosepphus roman writer wrote in the 1st century A.D. that all the Magorians come from Magog, who are all Scythians! The new historical data collated with the archaeogenetic ones proved to us that Magor's people were Europeans, probably European Scythians, and Hunor's people were those from Central Asia, and the mythology of the brothers "Hunor and Magor" would have been created from these two union of tribes! It's just that the genetic data clearly showed us that those who came from Asia were always in the minority compared to those from Europe. I quote a few lines from the publications of genetic origin research from the website of the Hungarian Research Institute: "The presence of the ancestors of today's Hungarians in the Carpathian Basin has been continuous for thousands of years" "A new database of 16,000 mitogenomes of 172 ancient and living populations has been created and investigated their connection system based on artificial intelligence method. The new algorithm recognizes all haplogroup correlations, regardless of the time of the process behind the correlation. A new methodological article has been published in the journal Molecular Genetics and Genomics by the researchers of the Archaeogenetic Research Center of the Hungarian Research Institute, the Department of Genetics of the University of Szeged, the Institute of Technical Physics and Materials Science." "The Carpathian Basin is an unbreakable unit Applying the method to the investigation of the former and present-day populations of the Carpathian Basin, the authors found that the vast majority of the present-day population is from a Copper Age (4500 BC-2800 BC) - Bronze Age (2800 BC-700 BC) can be traced back to a basic population, while immigration from the eastern steppe region seems to have had a smaller genetic impact on the population in the tenth-eleventh centuries." These data confirmed what the Hungarian chroniclers had already written, and some ancient writers also wrote such as Paulus Orosius, who wrote in the 5th century during the time of the Huns, that "The Huns invaded Pannonia, but the people there call that country Hungarya." And what some Hungarian archaeologists and anthropologists have also realized, especially in the last 120 years, that Árpád's people were very few compared to the population here, who stayed here even after the destruction of the Avars and welcomed Árpád's people as well! Archaeologist and historian László Gyula also came to the conclusion after several decades of research and excavations that Árpád's people found Hungarians in large numbers here in the Carpathian Basin, since in many places where Hungarian place names were already in the first descriptions, the so-called "conquerors" did not settle not even close! And archaeologist, historian and geographer Marjalaki Kiss Lajos describes the real origin of the Hungarians in a more comprehensible and concrete way in his work entitled "Historical Studies": „At the time of Árpád's occupation, the vast majority of Hungary, especially the eponymous but peasant population of the regions east of the Danube-Garam line - based on the geographical names of Anonymus - could not have been other than Hungarian, because since slavic nouns denoting Bulgarian-Slavic and Czech rule in the 9th century are dwarfed by the mass of more ancient Ugric-Hungarian names denoting larger geographical objects. None of the river names with Hungarian names mentioned in Anonymus's gesta has yet been proven to have been called something else before! But this is not likely, because the Danube, Tisza, Szamos, Körös, Temes, Olt, Zala, Rába, Balaton, etc. are known from sources before the 10th century. our waters also kept their old names, although their shores were known from history as Dacians, Celts, Illyrians, Romans, Sarmatians, Germans, Huns, Avars, Bulgarians, Slavs and Hungarians. It should be noted that if the Hungarian-speaking common people had only come to our country with Árpád, then there would be no Hungarian vineyard names in our earliest certificates. And there are quite a few of them already. Who were the original inhabitants of Transylvania? The crown witnesses of this case are the river names. And the water names of the landscapes east of the Tisza, both in Anonymus and in Ortvay's two-volume collection of water names from Árpád's time, as well as the water names that have developed in the course of history and are still in use today, and which have been commonplace in the Hungarian, Transylvanian Saxon and Vlach languages, indisputably testify to Hungarian origin and Hungarian aboriginal population. Some examples: Szamos, Almás, Kapus, Sár, Körös, Tekerő, Tur, Maros, Poklos, Hölgyes, Hódos, Gyepes, Medgyes, Barca, Olt, Árpás, Hévíz, Sebes, Nádas, Kékes, Aranyos, Bodza, Homoród, Hideg, Lápos… Not one of the larger river names has an Vlach name, but they also use the same names as the Hungarians and Saxons. Witnesses of the primacy of the population, the river names thus testify to the certainty of Hungarian ancestry."
@Ταργιτάος1 not just hydronyms but toponyms as well prove that that vlachs are latecomers to the area, as these names are hungarian/germanic/slavic/ old turk origin. Moreover daco-taco romanians dont really care about the fact that for 700 years they used hungarian names for roman/dacian names such as Cluj to Napoca, slavic Gradiste for the dacian fort Sarmisgethusa etc. This had only changed after the big fairytale creator Ceausescu rewritten their history in a chauvinistic style.
@@nicknem174 The renowned historian and linguist Kniezsa István writes, based on his research, that 83% of the names of the places mentioned in Transylvania up to the year 1300 are Hungarian, and only 0.6% are Romanian! Of the 1757 names recorded up to the year 1400, 1355 names are of Hungarian origin (77%) and 76 Romanian (4.3%), and a small number of names are Slavic, Germanic, Turkish and of unknown origin! These data are very important from the perspective of the origin of these communities, because from these names of settlements and geographical names you can see the emergence and gradual growth of the Wallachian population, who spoke a completely different language! And this is what the indoctrinated Romanians don't want to understand, that these names clearly understood in the Hungarian language could not be translated by them, because these two languages differ extremely much, and that's why they started to imitate these names, and it just came out crooked , which often means absolutely nothing in Romanian! Because there are still many uneducated Romanians who believed the story of these falsifiers of history, that the Hungarians would have Hungarianized the old Romanian names from Transylvania and from the parts of eastern Hungary, where Romanians still live, but for someone who knows both languages this is absolutely absurd! And all this clearly proves that the Romanians could not be natives of Transylvania, something that the Vlachs never believed anyway, but until the historians of the Transylvanian Romanian school appeared with these phantasmagoric stories in the 19th century!
Really? He was betrayed by the Romanians in every battle, and even taken prisoner after the defeat in Varna. (Vlad Tepes) If Hunyadi had been asked what nationality he considers himself to be, he would have said Romanian last.
@jozsinagy9833 the kingdom were broken up some fought for Poland and while other fought for Hungarian and his own people would betray him to that time was hard to understand
You're right *Ð,đ* is pronounced as *G* like in Germany and by the way Ðurađ is a variation of Georg. And about letter ć is almost the same as tch in witch.
@@thieph According to all real data, she came from an ancient Hungarian noble family and had nothing to do with the Romanians, because this was recently confirmed by archaeogenetic studies! The reality is that there is no contemporary data that "Woyk", whom King Sigismund rewarded with Hunyad Castle, was really the father of Hunyadi János, because these were all much later references that were falsified even in the last century! But what we know for sure is that Hunyadi's father was already a Catholic noble, because in the Hungarian kingdom only Catholic nobles could receive lands and estates, laws stipulated this! Or why did Hunyadi János or his son King Matthias, never say that their ancestors came from Wallachia? Because in all contemporary data, he and his entire family considered themselves Hungarian Catholic nobles! In fact, he never went to Wallachia to visit his birthplace, because no one can name what kind of settlement it is, and that's only because there isn't one! Many people refer to Thuróczy János and Antonio Bonfini when discussing Romanian ancestry when want to prove it, but in fact these chroniclers did not write anything specific and wrote their works many decades after Hunyadi János death! Thuróczy claims that "nobili et claro Transalpinae gentis de gremio natus erat", and they refer to this as meaning that he comes from a noble and notable family from Transalpina, and that Zsigmond brought his father from there to his own country. But these falsifiers of history never say that Thuróczy then adds: ‟‟fertur‟‟ that is, they just say it like that, so this means that it is a rumor, he does not know from a reliable source! On the contrary, all such forgers are now deeply silent about the fact that since then the certificate of King László V., under whom Hunyadi János served the most, has been found, and in this certificate he writes the following about Hunyadi: "Joannes, filius Vajvode de Verebel." And this is also very interesting, because no one disputes that in the certificates "Petrus, filius Georgii de Vereb" or "Petrus Vajvode de Verebel" was the Hungarian voivode Péter Verebélyi of Transylvania! And who became the voivode of Transylvania ten years later, but Hunyadi János?! Historians are silent about the fact that this Verebélyi family also has the raven in its coat of arms, and it looks like only these two great noble families in Hungary at that time had the raven in their coat of arms! For the Verebély family, the raven - holló was by all accounts a reference to their origin, as it also turned out that there was a settlement called Hollós, which was their property and where a Hollósvár built by their ancestors could have existed! Because those who don't know Hungarian don't even know that the name of the raven is holló in Hungarian, and that's how this settlement and the castle were called! According to contemporary data, King Sigismund donated this settlement together with Kikinda to László Hagymás, and Hagymás sold it to János Hunyadi. Isn't it logical that Hunyadi bought the settlement where his ancestors came from? And then here comes the very interesting thing, that no one thought that the Italian chronicler of King Matthias, Antonio Bonfini, took this name "Corvinus" from the name of the Hungarian settlement Hollós, because the name of the raven is corvus in Latin, but also corvinus in the time of the Romans was written, from which Bonfini also derived a fictitious Roman origin. But this had nothing to do with the Romanians at that time, since at that time the Vlachs had not even invented their Roman origins, let alone their Daco-Roman origin! And now the most likely data that Bonfini could have taken from Mátyás is when he writes: "Matthias Corvin, born to the father of Hunyadi Hollós János, took the first of his first names from Hunyad Castle, located in the farthest part of Transylvania, and the other from the village in which he born." And here, Bonfini was probably referring to the paternal ancestors of King Mátyás, but some people deliberately misinterpreted his writing, because our academic historians explain this as Bonfini must have been wrong here as well, since Mátyás was born in Kolozsvár - Cluj, but here it is not about Mátyás and not even about Hunyadi János! No matter how we take it, Antonio Bonfini clearly describes that Mátyás took his second first name, Corvin, or Hollós in Hungarian, from the village, i.e. Hollós, from which his ancestors came! According to the unmistakable words of King László V's often mentioned 1453 certificate, Hunyadi's ancestors had the right to use a coat of arms thanks to the grace of the Hungarian kings! So this also strongly proves that they could not use their coat of arms starting with their father, but for much longer, probably for many centuries, which completely contradicts the fact that Hunyadi's father was Woyk! However, we do not know of the Woyk's family that they used any kind of coat of arms, at least no description of this has yet been found, so it is quite possible that they were really Cumans or Vlachs from Wallachia, who then disappeared in the storm of history, and may have been taken their property by Hunyadi János, and this is where the confusion comes from later! Because it is certain that already in the first half of the 15th century, Hunyadi became the owner of the entire county of Hunyad, which is already mentioned as Huniad in the 1256 papal charter! And the town and the earthen castle where the castle of the Hunyadis was later built, was mentioned as Hungnod and Huniad. And this is certainly a name with an ancient Hungarian meaning, which was already written down from the 13th century, but it is probably much older! And I am writing this only because the Romanians also falsified the origin of this name, because they say that it has always been Hunedoara, but it is certain that this did not mean anything in Romanian either, and the first Vlachs renamed this county and castle in their own language in a mirror translation! Anyway, it is now a genetically proven fact that the Hunyadi family could not have come from the Romanians, because they were able to take very good quality samples from the bones of King Matthias' son János Corvin and his minor child found in Lepoglava, Croatia! The samples belonging to the same main group as the Hunyadis from the Carpathian Basin are the following: an Avar sample (AD 650-675). A sample of a Hungarian elite soldier, conquest period (895-950 AD) (Neparáczki et al. 2019) and a sample of a medieval Hungarian noble (Nagy et al. 2021, Olasz et al. 2019). And all of this confirms Hunyadi's blood relationship with the Verebélyi's family! But I ask, about which these scoundrel historians are deeply silent, where are the graves of Woyk and his family? Because if the graves of Hunyadi and his son László are there in the Archbishop's Cathedral of Gyulafehérvár, then at least the graves of his father and mother should be somewhere nearby, right? But no one knows anything about them, not even his mother, and this can only be explained by the fact that it was because they were from Verebélyi blood, and they really have their graves, and moreover, sarcophags similar to Hunyadi's, and the raven is also on them!
Strange, the he gave such a whupping to the Turks in 1456 that they went home with their tail between their legs, and came back only 70 years afzet his death.
According to most contemporary sources, he was the member of a noble family of Wallachian ancestry! János Hunyadi’s father, Vajk( VOICU in Romanian), came from Wallachia (now southern Romania) to the court of the Hungarian King Sigismund of Luxemburg, and received the estate of Hunyadvár (today Vajdahunyad in Hungarian and Hunedoara in Romanian, located in Transylvania, Romania) as a perpetual gift in 1409. Where is the mystery and why saying his ancestry is a matter of debate?!...the only thing here is that he was a Romanian/valach who ruled Hungary as Governor! He spoke well Romanian and also Hungarian!...Either you do not have the whole information about him or you just cited the Western sources + of course the Hungarian ones- they will present him always something else, but not a Romanian!( guess why?) :))))....you should check also the sources from the country of Romania. You will be surprised!
You Romanians have already written so many lies about the Hunyadians and the whole of Hungarian history that a river could be blocked with them! But the reality is that there is no contemporary data that "Woyk", whom King Sigismund rewarded with Hunyad Castle, was really the father of Hunyadi János, because these were all much later references that were falsified even in the last century! But what we know for sure is that Hunyadi's father was already a Catholic noble, because in the Hungarian kingdom only Catholic nobles could receive lands and estates, laws stipulated this! Or why did Hunyadi János or his son King Matthias, never say that their ancestors came from Wallachia? Because in all contemporary data, he and his entire family considered themselves Hungarian Catholic nobles! In fact, he never went to Wallachia to visit his birthplace, because no one can name what kind of settlement it is, and that's only because there isn't one! Many people refer to Thuróczy János and Antonio Bonfini when discussing Romanian ancestry when want to prove it, but in fact these chroniclers did not write anything specific and wrote their works many decades after Hunyadi János death! Thuróczy claims that "nobili et claro Transalpinae gentis de gremio natus erat", and they refer to this as meaning that he comes from a noble and notable family from Transalpina, and that Zsigmond brought his father from there to his own country. But these falsifiers of history never say that Thuróczy then adds: ‟‟fertur‟‟ that is, they just say it like that, so this means that it is a rumor, he does not know from a reliable source! On the contrary, all such forgers are now deeply silent about the fact that since then the certificate of King László V., under whom Hunyadi János served the most, has been found, and in this certificate he writes the following about Hunyadi: "Joannes, filius Vajvode de Verebel." And this is also very interesting, because no one disputes that in the certificates "Petrus, filius Georgii de Vereb" or "Petrus Vajvode de Verebel" was the Hungarian voivode Péter Verebélyi of Transylvania! And who became the voivode of Transylvania ten years later, but Hunyadi János?! Historians are silent about the fact that this Verebélyi family also has the raven in its coat of arms, and it looks like only these two great noble families in Hungary at that time had the raven in their coat of arms! For the Verebély family, the raven - holló was by all accounts a reference to their origin, as it also turned out that there was a settlement called Hollós, which was their property and where a Hollósvár built by their ancestors could have existed! Because those who don't know Hungarian don't even know that the name of the raven is holló in Hungarian, and that's how this settlement and the castle were called! According to contemporary data, King Sigismund donated this settlement together with Kikinda to László Hagymás, and Hagymás sold it to János Hunyadi. Isn't it logical that Hunyadi bought the settlement where his ancestors came from? And then here comes the very interesting thing, that no one thought that the Italian chronicler of King Matthias, Antonio Bonfini, took this name "Corvinus" from the name of the Hungarian settlement Hollós, because the name of the raven is corvus in Latin, but also corvinus in the time of the Romans was written, from which Bonfini also derived a fictitious Roman origin. But this had nothing to do with the Romanians at that time, since at that time the Vlachs had not even invented their Roman origins, let alone their Daco-Roman origin! And now the most likely data that Bonfini could have taken from Mátyás is when he writes: "Matthias Corvin, born to the father of Hunyadi Hollós János, took the first of his first names from Hunyad Castle, located in the farthest part of Transylvania, and the other from the village in which he born." And here, Bonfini was probably referring to the paternal ancestors of King Mátyás, but some people deliberately misinterpreted his writing, because our academic historians explain this as Bonfini must have been wrong here as well, since Mátyás was born in Kolozsvár - Cluj, but here it is not about Mátyás and not even about Hunyadi János! No matter how we take it, Antonio Bonfini clearly describes that Mátyás took his second first name, Corvin, or Hollós in Hungarian, from the village, i.e. Hollós, from which his ancestors came! According to the unmistakable words of King László V's often mentioned 1453 certificate, Hunyadi's ancestors had the right to use a coat of arms thanks to the grace of the Hungarian kings! So this also strongly proves that they could not use their coat of arms starting with their father, but for much longer, probably for many centuries, which completely contradicts the fact that Hunyadi's father was Woyk! However, we do not know of the Woyk's family that they used any kind of coat of arms, at least no description of this has yet been found, so it is quite possible that they were really Cumans or Vlachs from Wallachia, who then disappeared in the storm of history, and may have been taken their property by Hunyadi János, and this is where the confusion comes from later! Because it is certain that already in the first half of the 15th century, Hunyadi became the owner of the entire county of Hunyad, which is already mentioned as Huniad in the 1256 papal charter! And the town and the earthen castle where the castle of the Hunyadis was later built, was mentioned as Hungnod and Huniad. And this is certainly a name with an ancient Hungarian meaning, which was already written down from the 13th century, but it is probably much older! And I am writing this only because the Romanians also falsified the origin of this name, because they say that it has always been Hunedoara, but it is certain that this did not mean anything in Romanian either, and the first Vlachs renamed this county and castle in their own language in a mirror translation! Anyway, it is now a genetically proven fact that the Hunyadi family could not have come from the Romanians, because they were able to take very good quality samples from the bones of King Matthias' son János Corvin and his minor child found in Lepoglava, Croatia! The samples belonging to the same main group as the Hunyadis from the Carpathian Basin are the following: an Avar sample (AD 650-675). A sample of a Hungarian elite soldier, conquest period (895-950 AD) (Neparáczki et al. 2019) and a sample of a medieval Hungarian noble (Nagy et al. 2021, Olasz et al. 2019). And all of this confirms Hunyadi's blood relationship with the Verebélyi's family! But I ask, about which these scoundrel historians are deeply silent, where are the graves of Woyk and his family? Because if the graves of Hunyadi and his son László are there in the Archbishop's Cathedral of Gyulafehérvár, then at least the graves of his father and mother should be somewhere nearby, right? But no one knows anything about them, not even his mother, and this can only be explained by the fact that it was because they were from Verebélyi blood, and they really have their graves, and moreover, sarcophags similar to Hunyadi's, and the raven is also on them! The other big lie is the name Voicu, because nobody knows such Romanians from history, and it is just like Iancu, because they never called Hunyadi named Iancu, this was also forged after the name of Avram Iancu to make it acceptable to the Romanians! These are the invented names of the great Romanian history falsifiers, such as Nicolae Iorga, because it is true that the Serbs and Croats called Hunyadi Janko, but no one in the Hungarian kingdom ever called him that, so probably not even his family, and such a name is not known from the medieval archives! Even 150 years ago, the majority of Romanians had not heard much about Hunyadi, they didn't even know who János Hunyadi and King Mátyás were! But the Romanian intellectuals knew, and they were very disturbed that the Hunyadi name became famous throughout Europe and that they were included among the greatest heroes of the world, and the main problem was that they were the Hungarian rulers! The Vlachs betrayed Hunyadi János several times in favor of the Turks, for example, in the battle of Varna, the voivode of Muntenia broke his promise and turned against the Hungarians! Why would the Vlachs have always betrayed Hunyadi János and his son King Matthias if he had been of Romanian origin?!
@@historyprofiles Forgive me but sometimes you have to get someone else to do the presenting - years ago I was forced (by the company I was working for) to watch a documentary on the idea of 'zero defects' in Computing. The funny thing was that the American guy who gave the video presentation had a speech defect which made one wonder why he hadn't employed someone to give the message. I'm sure you know many colleagues who would read your fine detailed text.
@@yllbardh Not suggesting you use AI, just suggesting you find a friend / colleague who has a good voice for presentation - I don't want to cause you extra expense - but if you really wish to improve your product a good presentation voice is paramount.
Hunyadi is not a hero but a coward bastard. He ditched his men two times in varna and in second kosovo battles and fled the battlefiled sneakily and left the coalition army in varna, and his own infantry in kosovo to be butchered by Ottomans next day.
It was NOT cowardice, it was all according to plan AND only some of the common soldiers were slaughtered, most were enslaved or settled in remote parts of the empire while the noblemen were usually ransomed back for a handsome price although some "died in captivity" (pledged loyalty to the Sultan, married local women, abandoned their families back home and became Ottomans) . It was all done to promote modern values of multiculturalism and genetic diversity.
@@jym22jym22 hahahhaha ...true enough but....to promote values of multiculturalism and genetic diversity??? hahahhahahah....they were afraid not to be killed there and accepted Islam in the end...they were never thinking of multiculturalism...hahahhaha...good joke mate!
3 different pictures of 1 man, 🙄😂 narrative off this programme is half baked information...Lies again..European history always leaves out the fact alot of Knights were Moors..this dude shown pictures of different people..
Those Hungarian castles are incredible.
Very well researched video. As a Romanian, thank you. His castle is intact, beautiful and can be visited. I am looking foreward for the video on his son, Matei
You do realize that he was not a Romanian and that he definitely not consider himself one?
I'm just very thankful for all the border land Christian nations, Hungary and Romania kept their freedom and their faith, and fought for truth and justice before it became fashionable to do so.
Thank you so much for watching! I hope you enjoyed the video! I may have to make a video on his son!
@@85szabolcs u realize that he was half Romanian,and he didn`t said that because we where consider peasants by some mongols thats why!! ;) ohh and matia was made with a Romanian woman that changed her name!!!
@@andreasbalamuc2103 u delulu but okay
He is a key figure of the Hungarian history and that of the wider region. He was an excellent strategist and diplomat, who became nevetheless also the largest landowner of Hungary. There is a new international TV show just presented in October in Cannes called the Rise of the Raven , we expect it to be available to watch from Spring 2025. The creators were very thoughtfull in trying to present the era including the various languages spoken by characters as documentaristic as possible. We will see how they managed soon, the trailer looks impressive.
Thank you so much for watching!! I hope you enjoyed the video! I can't wait for the show to come out!
I just watched the trailer
The fighting scenes looked very "Hollywood" (not realistic) with the "heroes" fighting in full armour but without helmet and with perfect hair in the midst of battle... You can leave most of your armour at home, but never your helmet. Even the lowest peasants had some kind of head protection.
@@guycalabrese4040 not sure if that was the case in Central Eastern Europe and Balkans for those who were not mercenaries, but simple serfs from Balkans. Please note, these campaigns were multiethnic from armour to weapons used varied based on the region. It will be easier to validate when you see which battle is depicted- Belgrade, Varna etc etc.
@@katalinkozak9869 Total wrong.
@@jozsefsandor671 what is wrong?
John Hunyadi is the greatest man that ever lived
Thank you so much for watching! He was the ultimate man for sure utterly epic
One of the great unsung heroes of the middle ages. His story definitely warrants a Hollywood blockbuster, but that will never happen
One of the greatest hungarian
Thanks Ollie. Amazing
Thank you so much for watching!! I hope you enjoyed the video!
Excellent documentary. Very many thanks
@@ChristopherBowly thank you so much for watching!! I hope you enjoyed!!
Thank you for the video I've heard of him before but I learned something new today as well.
Thank you so much for watching! He really was quite a man!
@historyprofiles enjoy the rest of your week
Never heard of this guy, but I'm glad I watched your video. Great fuc**** historical video
@@jackiec.barnes9567 thank you so much! Glad you enjoyed!!
I'm a bit late for the history lesson, but Hunyadi sounds like an intriguing figure
Thank you so much for watching! I hope you enjoyed the video!
Just the video I needed before I visit Romania later this evening, thank you!
@@johnbuxton4484 hope you enjoy the video!!!
The castle is in Transylvania, the picture of the video are not showing his castle in Hunyad.
@katalinkozak9869 thank you for the correction 👍
Thanks For this! Love your content ❤❤❤❤
Thank you so much for watching!!
Sorry i am late History Profiles, but very amazed with this great video. Thank you so much, listening now on my evening
Thank you so much for watching ELKE! I hope you enjoyed the video!
@historyprofiles
You're welcome Ollie. Thank you, i really enjoyed it and rewatched it!
@ thank you Elke! Hunyadi really was quite a man!
@@historyprofiles
He was indeed! I really loved this history too, as much. Thank you Ollie, i hope you get the ads also! 👍
As always, brother, great hearing from you and keep on bringing the great content 🤙🏾 ✊🏽
Thank you so much for watching!! I hope you enjoyed the video brother! Have a great day!
Thank you for not filling your video with junk ai Images
Thank you so much for watching! I hope you enjoyed the video!
This is His/Her Story, that is now becoming your iconic phrase (so many youtubers have their iconic phrase)
I hope you enjoyed the video! haha yes, it is becoming my phrase!
Janos Hunyadi the Hungarian Savior! We have paintings and statues of him and the beautiful Hungarian castle in modern day romania.
Thank you so much for watching! I hope you enjoyed the video! I cant wait to visit Hungaria one day!
@ Yes great video
Please consider doing videos on the Habsburgs! Your format is great
Their family tree is more of a grape vine.
@@jayterry8551so true 😂
Thank you so much! & Thank you for watching! Any suggestions?
My favorite faction in Medieval 2 total war
Thank you so much for watching!! I hope you enjoyed the video!
Great hungarian noble and leader.
Amazing so interesting well done
Thank you so much for watching!! I hope you enjoyed the video!
Good video, interesting story.
The truth is that no one knows Hunyadi's exact origins, no one knows what his mother tongue was or what language his parents spoke, and we don't even know what nationality Hunyadi considered himself to be. In the Middle Ages, this was not as important as it is today, but a few things are certain: Hunyadi was the governor of Magyarorszűg, then its captain-in-chief, and he fought for Hungary as a Hungarian nobleman. All the rest is speculation and shouldn't be dealt with, but for some reason Romanians can't let go of this atheme. On such a basis, one could also deal with the fact that Mihály Vitéz was of Greek origin, but interestingly, under the videos related to him, the Romanians do not write that Mihály Vitáz was not even Romanian. A joke.
"Turk-Buster"!! The man ate Turks for breakfast with a sprinkling of blood
I have turkey every thanksgiving
Turk Buster, The White Knight, what cool nicknames to have. Thank you so much for watching!! I hope you enjoyed the video!
Amazing
"She married a young noblewoman"??😃
I was confused too lol
Mistake, was meant to say nobleman! Im so sorry! I can't beleive that made it past the quality check! My bad everyone!
@@historyprofiles , You're totally fine, it just made me question whether I was understanding things correctly! That's all!😂
Janos Hunyadi for a Hungarian or Jancu the son of Voicu, was born around the today city of Hunedoara. I grew up in the village Racastia and then in the city proper Hunedoara. The whole county Hunedoara is a very old land that belonged to the Dacians occupied by Roman armies after 106 AD. The Castle was built on a old Dacian fortress. Jancu served the Hungarian king and he NEVER did anything good for his Vlach people. Mattias, his son forgot that he was half Vlah or Romanian he married into the Hungarian nobility and
stopped speaking Vlach, latin.
Dacians have nothing to do with vlachs
These are fairy tales and historical falsifications invented by Romanians like Daniel Roxin, so 0.1% is based on reality! In reality, there never was a Hunyadi named Iancu, these are the invented names of the great Romanian history falsifiers like Nicolae Iorga, because it is true that the Serbs and Croats called Hunyadi Jankó, but they were never called that way in the Hungarian kingdom, and no such name is known from the Hunyadi archives! The Romanians faked his name from this Croatian Jankó to make it seem more Romanian than the name of Avram Iancu! Even 150 years ago, the majority of Romanians had not heard much about the Hunyadi people, they didn't even know who János Hunyadi and King Mátyás were! But the Romanian intellectuals knew, and they were very disturbed that the Hunyadi name became famous throughout Europe and that they were included among the greatest heroes of the world, and the main problem was that they were the Hungarian rulers! Because these references were all much later writings, which were often spread by the enemies of King Matthias, and therefore it is quite possible that they were not true! But what we know for sure is that János Hunyadi's father was already a Catholic noble, because in the Hungarian kingdom only Catholic nobles could receive land and property, this was required by law!
Based on the latest research, Hunyadi János was also born in Kolozsvár, and then it is understandable why his wife gave birth to his younger son, Mátyás, in the same royal city, because at that time it was the most developed center in the Eastern Hungarian kingdom! It also turned out that there is no contemporary information that the Vajk whom King Sigismund awarded with the county of Hunyad was really János's father! Posterity considered Vajk to be the father of János Hunyadi because two chroniclers in the time of King Matthias hinted that János's father might have come from Valachia?! Thuróczy János claims that he is "nobili et claro Transalpinae gentis de gremio natus erat", i.e. he comes from a noble and notable family from Transalpina, and that Zsigmond brought his father from there to his own country, but he adds: "fertur", that is, that's what they say, so you don't know from a reliable source! However, neither these chroniclers nor even King Matthias himself ever mentioned that his grandfather was called Woyk or Vajk!
On the other hand, everyone is deeply silent about the fact that since then King Ulászló's certificate has also been found, in which he probably writes the following about Hunyadi János, who became her greatest general: "Joannes, filius Vajvode de Verebel." And this is also very interesting, because no one disputes that in the certificates "Petrus, filius Georgii de Vereb" or "Petrus Vajvode de Verebel" was the voivode Verebélyi Péter of Transylvania! And who became the voivode of Transylvania a few years later, but Hunyadi János?! Historians are silent about the fact that this Verebélyi family also has the raven in its coat of arms, and it looks like only these two great noble families in Hungary at that time had the raven in their coat of arms! For the Verebélyi family, the raven was by all accounts a reference to their origin, as it also turned out that there was a settlement called Hollós, which was their property and where a Hollósvár built by their ancestors could have existed! According to contemporary data, King Sigismund donated this settlement together with Kikinda to Hagymás László, and in an interesting way Hagymás sold it to Hunyadi János! Could it be that Hunyadi bought this settlement because he knew very well that his ancestors came from there?! It is also very interesting that nobody wanted to take this seriously, that the Italian chronicler of King Matthias, Antonio Bonfini, took the name "Corvinus" from the name of the Hungarian settlement of Hollós, because the name of the raven is corvus in Latin, but it was also written as corvinus in Roman times, from which Bonfini also derived a fictitious Roman origin. But the most likely data is what Bonfini could have taken from King Matthias himself, when he writes: "Mátyás Corvin, born to the father of János Hollós Hunyadi, took the first of his first names from the castle of Hunyad in the farthest part of Transylvania, and the other from the village in which he born." And here Bonfini was probably thinking of King Matthias' paternal ancestors. No matter how we take it, Bonfini clearly describes that King Matthias took his second given name, Corvin, Hollós in Hungarian, from the village Hollós, where his ancestors probably came from! According to the unmistakable words of King László V's often mentioned certificate of 1453, Hunyadi's ancestors received the right to use the coat of arms thanks to the grace of the Hungarian kings! This made it clear that their right to use the coat of arms did not start with his father, but much longer, which again contradicts the fact that Vajk was Hunyadi's father! However, we know very well about the family of "Vajk son of the Serb" that they did not use any coat of arms, at least no description of this has yet been found, so it is quite possible that they were really Cumans or Vlachs from Wallachia, who then disappeared in the storm of history, and János Hunyadi probably either received it from the king or bought their estates! And then this explains why King Matthias never wrote about his grandfather named Vajk, and also why the people of Hollós and Hunyadi had the right to use the ancient Hungarian coat of arms! Because it is certain that already in the first half of the 15th century, Hunyadi became the owner of the entire county of Hunyad, which is already mentioned as Huniad in the 1256 papal charter, and the town and the earthen castle where the castle of the Hunyadis was later built, as "Hungnod" and "Huniad", and it was never called Hunedoara until the 20th century! And this is certainly a name with an ancient Hungarian meaning, which was already written down from the 13th century, but it is probably much older! And I am writing this only because the Romanians also falsified the origin of this name, because they say that it has always been Hunedoara, only the Hungarians Hungarianized all ancient Romanian names! All these data also prove that the name and origin of Hunyadi János was already tried to be muddied and falsified during the time of King Matthias, but especially after Matthias's death, because more and more people have been doing this ever since, and if you think about how many enemies they already had in their lives too, then it's no wonder! Anyway, no one is talking about the fact that the genetic research taken from the bones of King Matthias's son and two grandsons also proved that the ancestors of the Hunyadi's had more ancient Avar and Hungarian genes from the Carpathian basin, and had nothing to do with the Balkan Vlachs!
The other problem that contradicts Hunyadi's Romanian origin is the repeated betrayal of the Vlachs, who betrayed Hunyadi János several times in different battles, but later also his son King Mátyás, and this also proves that they were hated because they were Hungarians!
The problem is that the Romanians are misled about the ethnogenesis of the Hungarians, without even knowing that the Hungarian chroniclers of the Middle Ages wrote about the multi-millenary ethnogenesis of the Magors-Hungarians, which begins with Nemrot - Nimrod, who was the first king in the world and who had two sons, Hunor and Magor, from whom came the Scythians called Huns and Magyars! Foreign chroniclers also wrote about them, and historians agree that this mythology is much more ancient than the mythology of European peoples in general. The difference between mythologies like "Romulus and Remus" and the mythology with "Hunor and Magor" is huge, not only in time and space, but also as cultural ethnogenesis, because Hunor and Magor always lived in brotherhood, and sought peace between peoples , they never went to war with each other, but their peoples were never in conflict either! The authors of Antiquity also wrote about Magor, but it also appears in the Bible as Magog. Titus Flavius Iosepphus roman writer wrote in the 1st century A.D. that all the Magorians come from Magog, who are all Scythians! The new historical data collated with the archaeogenetic ones proved to us that Magor's people were Europeans, probably European Scythians, and Hunor's people were those from Central Asia, and the mythology of the brothers "Hunor and Magor" would have been created from these two union of tribes! It's just that the genetic data clearly showed us that those who came from Asia were always in the minority compared to those from Europe. I quote a few lines from the publications of genetic origin research from the website of the Hungarian Research Institute: "The presence of the ancestors of today's Hungarians in the Carpathian Basin has been continuous for thousands of years"
"A new database of 16,000 mitogenomes of 172 ancient and living populations has been created and investigated their connection system based on artificial intelligence
method. The new algorithm recognizes all haplogroup correlations, regardless of the time of the process behind the correlation. A new methodological article has been published in the journal Molecular Genetics and Genomics by the researchers of the Archaeogenetic Research Center of the Hungarian Research Institute, the Department of Genetics of the University of Szeged, the Institute of Technical Physics and Materials Science."
"The Carpathian Basin is an unbreakable unit
Applying the method to the investigation of the former and present-day populations of the Carpathian Basin, the authors found that the vast majority of the present-day population is from a Copper Age (4500 BC-2800 BC) - Bronze Age (2800 BC-700 BC) can be traced back to a basic population, while immigration from the eastern steppe region seems to have had a smaller genetic impact on the population in the tenth-eleventh centuries."
These data confirmed what the Hungarian chroniclers had already written, and some ancient writers also wrote such as Paulus Orosius, who wrote in the 5th century during the time of the Huns, that "The Huns invaded Pannonia, but the people there call that country Hungarya."
And what some Hungarian archaeologists and anthropologists have also realized, especially in the last 120 years, that Árpád's people were very few compared to the population here, who stayed here even after the destruction of the Avars and welcomed Árpád's people as well! Archaeologist and historian László Gyula also came to the conclusion after several decades of research and excavations that Árpád's people found Hungarians in large numbers here in the Carpathian Basin, since in many places where Hungarian place names were already in the first descriptions, the so-called "conquerors" did not settle not even close! And archaeologist, historian and geographer Marjalaki Kiss Lajos describes the real origin of the Hungarians in a more comprehensible and concrete way in his work entitled "Historical Studies":
„At the time of Árpád's occupation, the vast majority of Hungary, especially the eponymous but peasant population of the regions east of the Danube-Garam line - based on the geographical names of Anonymus - could not have been other than Hungarian, because since slavic nouns denoting Bulgarian-Slavic and Czech rule in the 9th century are dwarfed by the mass of more ancient Ugric-Hungarian names denoting larger geographical objects. None of the river names with Hungarian names mentioned in Anonymus's gesta has yet been proven to have been called something else before! But this is not likely, because the Danube, Tisza, Szamos, Körös, Temes, Olt, Zala, Rába, Balaton, etc. are known from sources before the 10th century. our waters also kept their old names, although their shores were known from history as Dacians, Celts, Illyrians, Romans, Sarmatians, Germans, Huns, Avars, Bulgarians, Slavs and Hungarians. It should be noted that if the Hungarian-speaking common people had only come to our country with Árpád, then there would be no Hungarian vineyard names in our earliest certificates. And there are quite a few of them already. Who were the original inhabitants of Transylvania? The crown witnesses of this case are the river names. And the water names of the landscapes east of the Tisza, both in Anonymus and in Ortvay's two-volume collection of water names from Árpád's time, as well as the water names that have developed in the course of history and are still in use today, and which have been commonplace in the Hungarian, Transylvanian Saxon and Vlach languages, indisputably testify to Hungarian origin and Hungarian aboriginal population. Some examples: Szamos, Almás, Kapus, Sár, Körös, Tekerő, Tur, Maros, Poklos, Hölgyes, Hódos, Gyepes, Medgyes, Barca, Olt, Árpás, Hévíz, Sebes, Nádas, Kékes, Aranyos, Bodza, Homoród, Hideg, Lápos…
Not one of the larger river names has an Vlach name, but they also use the same names as the Hungarians and Saxons. Witnesses of the primacy of the population, the river names thus testify to the certainty of Hungarian ancestry."
@Ταργιτάος1 not just hydronyms but toponyms as well prove that that vlachs are latecomers to the area, as these names are hungarian/germanic/slavic/ old turk origin. Moreover daco-taco romanians dont really care about the fact that for 700 years they used hungarian names for roman/dacian names such as Cluj to Napoca, slavic Gradiste for the dacian fort Sarmisgethusa etc. This had only changed after the big fairytale creator Ceausescu rewritten their history in a chauvinistic style.
@@nicknem174 The renowned historian and linguist Kniezsa István writes, based on his research, that 83% of the names of the places mentioned in Transylvania up to the year 1300 are Hungarian, and only 0.6% are Romanian! Of the 1757 names recorded up to the year 1400, 1355 names are of Hungarian origin (77%) and 76 Romanian (4.3%), and a small number of names are Slavic, Germanic, Turkish and of unknown origin! These data are very important from the perspective of the origin of these communities, because from these names of settlements and geographical names you can see the emergence and gradual growth of the Wallachian population, who spoke a completely different language! And this is what the indoctrinated Romanians don't want to understand, that these names clearly understood in the Hungarian language could not be translated by them, because these two languages differ extremely much, and that's why they started to imitate these names, and it just came out crooked , which often means absolutely nothing in Romanian! Because there are still many uneducated Romanians who believed the story of these falsifiers of history, that the Hungarians would have Hungarianized the old Romanian names from Transylvania and from the parts of eastern Hungary, where Romanians still live, but for someone who knows both languages this is absolutely absurd! And all this clearly proves that the Romanians could not be natives of Transylvania, something that the Vlachs never believed anyway, but until the historians of the Transylvanian Romanian school appeared with these phantasmagoric stories in the 19th century!
Sir Sidney Smith - Guillermo Miller (Latin American Wars of independence), please do them.
💙
I'm from Romania and he a legend to my people
I hope you enjoyed the video! He is indeed a legend!
Really? He was betrayed by the Romanians in every battle, and even taken prisoner after the defeat in Varna. (Vlad Tepes) If Hunyadi had been asked what nationality he considers himself to be, he would have said Romanian last.
@jozsinagy9833 the kingdom were broken up some fought for Poland and while other fought for Hungarian and his own people would betray him to that time was hard to understand
@@catalindale7296 Bullshit.
@@jozsinagy9833 .... especially that there was no such an option for several centuries to come...
Sigismund has interesting headgear. It is a hat?
@@brassteeth3355 it looks like one of those hats you wear when it’s cold like a Russian one 😂 multiple portraits of him though in various headgear
I didnt know john hunyadi was such a controversial figure
these comments are wild
So one of his descendant found the automobile company?
Was Hunyadi was a contemporary of Vlad Tepes?!
This is slow at 1.5x but if I go to 2x I can’t examine the art at all. Record at a faster speaking pace.
Watch at 1,25 speed
10:40: Ð,đ is pronounced "g", so the name is "Djuradj". Also, I think that ć at the end of sirname is "tsh", so the name is "Brankovitsh".
You're right *Ð,đ* is pronounced as *G* like in Germany and by the way Ðurađ is a variation of Georg. And about letter ć is almost the same as tch in witch.
His father was romanian, this is what historian sources say. Hungarians don't want to recognize that their best dynasty was romanian😂
Must be good stuff you’re smoking there bud.
@@TheCount01 i don't smoke dry horse shit like you, mongol
@@thieph According to all real data, she came from an ancient Hungarian noble family and had nothing to do with the Romanians, because this was recently confirmed by archaeogenetic studies!
The reality is that there is no contemporary data that "Woyk", whom King Sigismund rewarded with Hunyad Castle, was really the father of Hunyadi János, because these were all much later references that were falsified even in the last century! But what we know for sure is that Hunyadi's father was already a Catholic noble, because in the Hungarian kingdom only Catholic nobles could receive lands and estates, laws stipulated this! Or why did Hunyadi János or his son King Matthias, never say that their ancestors came from Wallachia? Because in all contemporary data, he and his entire family considered themselves Hungarian Catholic nobles! In fact, he never went to Wallachia to visit his birthplace, because no one can name what kind of settlement it is, and that's only because there isn't one! Many people refer to Thuróczy János and Antonio Bonfini when discussing Romanian ancestry when want to prove it, but in fact these chroniclers did not write anything specific and wrote their works many decades after Hunyadi János death! Thuróczy claims that "nobili et claro Transalpinae gentis de gremio natus erat", and they refer to this as meaning that he comes from a noble and notable family from Transalpina, and that Zsigmond brought his father from there to his own country. But these falsifiers of history never say that Thuróczy then adds: ‟‟fertur‟‟ that is, they just say it like that, so this means that it is a rumor, he does not know from a reliable source! On the contrary, all such forgers are now deeply silent about the fact that since then the certificate of King László V., under whom Hunyadi János served the most, has been found, and in this certificate he writes the following about Hunyadi: "Joannes, filius Vajvode de Verebel." And this is also very interesting, because no one disputes that in the certificates "Petrus, filius Georgii de Vereb" or "Petrus Vajvode de Verebel" was the Hungarian voivode Péter Verebélyi of Transylvania! And who became the voivode of Transylvania ten years later, but Hunyadi János?! Historians are silent about the fact that this Verebélyi family also has the raven in its coat of arms, and it looks like only these two great noble families in Hungary at that time had the raven in their coat of arms! For the Verebély family, the raven - holló was by all accounts a reference to their origin, as it also turned out that there was a settlement called Hollós, which was their property and where a Hollósvár built by their ancestors could have existed! Because those who don't know Hungarian don't even know that the name of the raven is holló in Hungarian, and that's how this settlement and the castle were called! According to contemporary data, King Sigismund donated this settlement together with Kikinda to László Hagymás, and Hagymás sold it to János Hunyadi. Isn't it logical that Hunyadi bought the settlement where his ancestors came from? And then here comes the very interesting thing, that no one thought that the Italian chronicler of King Matthias, Antonio Bonfini, took this name "Corvinus" from the name of the Hungarian settlement Hollós, because the name of the raven is corvus in Latin, but also corvinus in the time of the Romans was written, from which Bonfini also derived a fictitious Roman origin. But this had nothing to do with the Romanians at that time, since at that time the Vlachs had not even invented their Roman origins, let alone their Daco-Roman origin! And now the most likely data that Bonfini could have taken from Mátyás is when he writes: "Matthias Corvin, born to the father of Hunyadi Hollós János, took the first of his first names from Hunyad Castle, located in the farthest part of Transylvania, and the other from the village in which he born." And here, Bonfini was probably referring to the paternal ancestors of King Mátyás, but some people deliberately misinterpreted his writing, because our academic historians explain this as Bonfini must have been wrong here as well, since Mátyás was born in Kolozsvár - Cluj, but here it is not about Mátyás and not even about Hunyadi János! No matter how we take it, Antonio Bonfini clearly describes that Mátyás took his second first name, Corvin, or Hollós in Hungarian, from the village, i.e. Hollós, from which his ancestors came! According to the unmistakable words of King László V's often mentioned 1453 certificate, Hunyadi's ancestors had the right to use a coat of arms thanks to the grace of the Hungarian kings! So this also strongly proves that they could not use their coat of arms starting with their father, but for much longer, probably for many centuries, which completely contradicts the fact that Hunyadi's father was Woyk! However, we do not know of the Woyk's family that they used any kind of coat of arms, at least no description of this has yet been found, so it is quite possible that they were really Cumans or Vlachs from Wallachia, who then disappeared in the storm of history, and may have been taken their property by Hunyadi János, and this is where the confusion comes from later! Because it is certain that already in the first half of the 15th century, Hunyadi became the owner of the entire county of Hunyad, which is already mentioned as Huniad in the 1256 papal charter! And the town and the earthen castle where the castle of the Hunyadis was later built, was mentioned as Hungnod and Huniad. And this is certainly a name with an ancient Hungarian meaning, which was already written down from the 13th century, but it is probably much older! And I am writing this only because the Romanians also falsified the origin of this name, because they say that it has always been Hunedoara, but it is certain that this did not mean anything in Romanian either, and the first Vlachs renamed this county and castle in their own language in a mirror translation! Anyway, it is now a genetically proven fact that the Hunyadi family could not have come from the Romanians, because they were able to take very good quality samples from the bones of King Matthias' son János Corvin and his minor child found in Lepoglava, Croatia! The samples belonging to the same main group as the Hunyadis from the Carpathian Basin are the following: an Avar sample (AD 650-675). A sample of a Hungarian elite soldier, conquest period (895-950 AD) (Neparáczki et al. 2019) and a sample of a medieval Hungarian noble (Nagy et al. 2021, Olasz et al. 2019). And all of this confirms Hunyadi's blood relationship with the Verebélyi's family! But I ask, about which these scoundrel historians are deeply silent, where are the graves of Woyk and his family? Because if the graves of Hunyadi and his son László are there in the Archbishop's Cathedral of Gyulafehérvár, then at least the graves of his father and mother should be somewhere nearby, right? But no one knows anything about them, not even his mother, and this can only be explained by the fact that it was because they were from Verebélyi blood, and they really have their graves, and moreover, sarcophags similar to Hunyadi's, and the raven is also on them!
@@Ταργιτάος1 acording to real data in your imagination, stinky troll🤣
@@thiephwhy did the romanians tore down Màtyàs's statue in Kolozsvàr (Cluj) in 1919???
Verbose, but enjoyable
Give me the Medici’s and the Sforza’s
Sultan vinegar
That is a fabulous stash 😂
Hunya
Why you couldn't use his real name, Hunyadi János, is beyond me.
He was severely beaten and Hungary defeated and absorbed by Ottoman Empire .lol
Strange, the he gave such a whupping to the Turks in 1456 that they went home with their tail between their legs, and came back only 70 years afzet his death.
"I believe it's pronounced Hyundai..." :p
According to most contemporary sources, he was the member of a noble family of Wallachian ancestry! János Hunyadi’s father, Vajk( VOICU in Romanian), came from Wallachia (now southern Romania) to the court of the Hungarian King Sigismund of Luxemburg, and received the estate of Hunyadvár (today Vajdahunyad in Hungarian and Hunedoara in Romanian, located in Transylvania, Romania) as a perpetual gift in 1409.
Where is the mystery and why saying his ancestry is a matter of debate?!...the only thing here is that he was a Romanian/valach who ruled Hungary as Governor! He spoke well Romanian and also Hungarian!...Either you do not have the whole information about him or you just cited the Western sources + of course the Hungarian ones- they will present him always something else, but not a Romanian!( guess why?) :))))....you should check also the sources from the country of Romania. You will be surprised!
You Romanians have already written so many lies about the Hunyadians and the whole of Hungarian history that a river could be blocked with them! But the reality is that there is no contemporary data that "Woyk", whom King Sigismund rewarded with Hunyad Castle, was really the father of Hunyadi János, because these were all much later references that were falsified even in the last century! But what we know for sure is that Hunyadi's father was already a Catholic noble, because in the Hungarian kingdom only Catholic nobles could receive lands and estates, laws stipulated this! Or why did Hunyadi János or his son King Matthias, never say that their ancestors came from Wallachia? Because in all contemporary data, he and his entire family considered themselves Hungarian Catholic nobles! In fact, he never went to Wallachia to visit his birthplace, because no one can name what kind of settlement it is, and that's only because there isn't one! Many people refer to Thuróczy János and Antonio Bonfini when discussing Romanian ancestry when want to prove it, but in fact these chroniclers did not write anything specific and wrote their works many decades after Hunyadi János death! Thuróczy claims that "nobili et claro Transalpinae gentis de gremio natus erat", and they refer to this as meaning that he comes from a noble and notable family from Transalpina, and that Zsigmond brought his father from there to his own country. But these falsifiers of history never say that Thuróczy then adds: ‟‟fertur‟‟ that is, they just say it like that, so this means that it is a rumor, he does not know from a reliable source! On the contrary, all such forgers are now deeply silent about the fact that since then the certificate of King László V., under whom Hunyadi János served the most, has been found, and in this certificate he writes the following about Hunyadi: "Joannes, filius Vajvode de Verebel." And this is also very interesting, because no one disputes that in the certificates "Petrus, filius Georgii de Vereb" or "Petrus Vajvode de Verebel" was the Hungarian voivode Péter Verebélyi of Transylvania! And who became the voivode of Transylvania ten years later, but Hunyadi János?! Historians are silent about the fact that this Verebélyi family also has the raven in its coat of arms, and it looks like only these two great noble families in Hungary at that time had the raven in their coat of arms! For the Verebély family, the raven - holló was by all accounts a reference to their origin, as it also turned out that there was a settlement called Hollós, which was their property and where a Hollósvár built by their ancestors could have existed! Because those who don't know Hungarian don't even know that the name of the raven is holló in Hungarian, and that's how this settlement and the castle were called! According to contemporary data, King Sigismund donated this settlement together with Kikinda to László Hagymás, and Hagymás sold it to János Hunyadi. Isn't it logical that Hunyadi bought the settlement where his ancestors came from? And then here comes the very interesting thing, that no one thought that the Italian chronicler of King Matthias, Antonio Bonfini, took this name "Corvinus" from the name of the Hungarian settlement Hollós, because the name of the raven is corvus in Latin, but also corvinus in the time of the Romans was written, from which Bonfini also derived a fictitious Roman origin. But this had nothing to do with the Romanians at that time, since at that time the Vlachs had not even invented their Roman origins, let alone their Daco-Roman origin! And now the most likely data that Bonfini could have taken from Mátyás is when he writes: "Matthias Corvin, born to the father of Hunyadi Hollós János, took the first of his first names from Hunyad Castle, located in the farthest part of Transylvania, and the other from the village in which he born." And here, Bonfini was probably referring to the paternal ancestors of King Mátyás, but some people deliberately misinterpreted his writing, because our academic historians explain this as Bonfini must have been wrong here as well, since Mátyás was born in Kolozsvár - Cluj, but here it is not about Mátyás and not even about Hunyadi János! No matter how we take it, Antonio Bonfini clearly describes that Mátyás took his second first name, Corvin, or Hollós in Hungarian, from the village, i.e. Hollós, from which his ancestors came! According to the unmistakable words of King László V's often mentioned 1453 certificate, Hunyadi's ancestors had the right to use a coat of arms thanks to the grace of the Hungarian kings! So this also strongly proves that they could not use their coat of arms starting with their father, but for much longer, probably for many centuries, which completely contradicts the fact that Hunyadi's father was Woyk! However, we do not know of the Woyk's family that they used any kind of coat of arms, at least no description of this has yet been found, so it is quite possible that they were really Cumans or Vlachs from Wallachia, who then disappeared in the storm of history, and may have been taken their property by Hunyadi János, and this is where the confusion comes from later! Because it is certain that already in the first half of the 15th century, Hunyadi became the owner of the entire county of Hunyad, which is already mentioned as Huniad in the 1256 papal charter! And the town and the earthen castle where the castle of the Hunyadis was later built, was mentioned as Hungnod and Huniad. And this is certainly a name with an ancient Hungarian meaning, which was already written down from the 13th century, but it is probably much older! And I am writing this only because the Romanians also falsified the origin of this name, because they say that it has always been Hunedoara, but it is certain that this did not mean anything in Romanian either, and the first Vlachs renamed this county and castle in their own language in a mirror translation! Anyway, it is now a genetically proven fact that the Hunyadi family could not have come from the Romanians, because they were able to take very good quality samples from the bones of King Matthias' son János Corvin and his minor child found in Lepoglava, Croatia! The samples belonging to the same main group as the Hunyadis from the Carpathian Basin are the following: an Avar sample (AD 650-675). A sample of a Hungarian elite soldier, conquest period (895-950 AD) (Neparáczki et al. 2019) and a sample of a medieval Hungarian noble (Nagy et al. 2021, Olasz et al. 2019). And all of this confirms Hunyadi's blood relationship with the Verebélyi's family! But I ask, about which these scoundrel historians are deeply silent, where are the graves of Woyk and his family? Because if the graves of Hunyadi and his son László are there in the Archbishop's Cathedral of Gyulafehérvár, then at least the graves of his father and mother should be somewhere nearby, right? But no one knows anything about them, not even his mother, and this can only be explained by the fact that it was because they were from Verebélyi blood, and they really have their graves, and moreover, sarcophags similar to Hunyadi's, and the raven is also on them!
The other big lie is the name Voicu, because nobody knows such Romanians from history, and it is just like Iancu, because they never called Hunyadi named Iancu, this was also forged after the name of Avram Iancu to make it acceptable to the Romanians! These are the invented names of the great Romanian history falsifiers, such as Nicolae Iorga, because it is true that the Serbs and Croats called Hunyadi Janko, but no one in the Hungarian kingdom ever called him that, so probably not even his family, and such a name is not known from the medieval archives! Even 150 years ago, the majority of Romanians had not heard much about Hunyadi, they didn't even know who János Hunyadi and King Mátyás were! But the Romanian intellectuals knew, and they were very disturbed that the Hunyadi name became famous throughout Europe and that they were included among the greatest heroes of the world, and the main problem was that they were the Hungarian rulers! The Vlachs betrayed Hunyadi János several times in favor of the Turks, for example, in the battle of Varna, the voivode of Muntenia broke his promise and turned against the Hungarians! Why would the Vlachs have always betrayed Hunyadi János and his son King Matthias if he had been of Romanian origin?!
Interesting story but what an unfortunate voice!!!
@@steveditchburn5887 I’m so sorry! I can’t change it!
@@historyprofiles Forgive me but sometimes you have to get someone else to do the presenting - years ago I was forced (by the company I was working for) to watch a documentary on the idea of 'zero defects' in Computing. The funny thing was that the American guy who gave the video presentation had a speech defect which made one wonder why he hadn't employed someone to give the message. I'm sure you know many colleagues who would read your fine detailed text.
@@steveditchburn5887 it is much, much better than using AI voice.
@@yllbardh Not suggesting you use AI, just suggesting you find a friend / colleague who has a good voice for presentation - I don't want to cause you extra expense - but if you really wish to improve your product a good presentation voice is paramount.
Hunyadi is not a hero but a coward bastard. He ditched his men two times in varna and in second kosovo battles and fled the battlefiled sneakily and left the coalition army in varna, and his own infantry in kosovo to be butchered by Ottomans next day.
It was NOT cowardice, it was all according to plan AND only some of the common soldiers were slaughtered, most were enslaved or settled in remote parts of the empire while the noblemen were usually ransomed back for a handsome price although some "died in captivity" (pledged loyalty to the Sultan, married local women, abandoned their families back home and became Ottomans) . It was all done to promote modern values of multiculturalism and genetic diversity.
@@jym22jym22 hahahhaha ...true enough but....to promote values of multiculturalism and genetic diversity??? hahahhahahah....they were afraid not to be killed there and accepted Islam in the end...they were never thinking of multiculturalism...hahahhaha...good joke mate!
@@jym22jym22 I have no idea what are talking about!
Why do westerners use despitism or despot as somewhat as derogative today ?
because they do not the true meaning of the word despot :))
He also makes good cars
Its Smederevo not Sendri
Szendrő.
3 different pictures of 1 man, 🙄😂 narrative off this programme is half baked information...Lies again..European history always leaves out the fact alot of Knights were Moors..this dude shown pictures of different people..
@@denzilessy253 a lot of different artists have drawn him? So I showed all the images of him? What points in the video were lies?