Damn, this is epic. Now, all I need to do is sit with some bright-minded people and ask them for software ideas they think can help them in the business.
We have been running an AI Start-up for a year now at RLVNT⚡✨ Having a team and employees is overrated now. We're just 3 people super productive and epic agency 🚀 We close high ticket clients, do some epic work, and expand through word of mouth.
With this and some improvements, you could build a one Human company surrounded by many AI agents working for you to generate a product, affiliate, marketing, market analysis, game development, content creation… skys the limit
how do we give it a document of information of web app, because off course one would not use to build a ping pong game, and instead would want to use it to build an actual useful product for which the prompt wont be as simple as "make me a ping pong game"
why not 100 ai? why not 1000 ai employees? You wait and soon we will be running the idea through 100000 coder agents alone that are all slightly different, and overall getting a very efficient output (in terms of quality)....then run it through 100k quality expert agents... I think doing it that way to capture the nuances is a faster way to better output rather than one large agent trying to be godlike. If individual skillsets are an efficient way to combine 'ideas' for a better output in real life, why not add a SHIT LOAD more ai agents and get recursive and re-iterative about it. It should only refine your output. If someone can come up with a way to have the similar agents NOT re-run the exact same parts in each individual that are producing identical output, but only their nuanced differences to save tokens, you could get far with it imo. Maybe after 100 iterations (arbitrary number) of the same chunk producing identical outputs, don't do it anymore and consider it an accepted truth. Don't run that part in future iterations and *assume* the outcome, within a range. You'd still get a bulk of nuanced takes giving you some intelligent variance, but admittedly you might lose a small percentage of random unique ways to solve a problem. Then down the road you keep analyzing which ways to 'solve x' are best. At a point you'd have a truth of sorts, after running many iterations through many different agents and getting the same thing. You can keep doing this refinement for parts of a much larger system and end up with a much more complex output. Disclaimer, I know basically nothing. School me on these thoughts if they are stupid, please.
You guys are great together as a team. I have a request. Please remake this with a free LLM instead of OpenAI. I paid a small fortune to OpenAI to create multiple agents to make my startup and it was an epic failure. Can this be done with opensource AI for free? Thanks
#ChatDev is not free to use. If you read the license, you cannot use it commercially without paying. If you use it as an interesting toy, you don't have to pay. If you use it in any moneymaking activity, you'll need to pay. They assert the code is licensed under the Apache 2.0 License (which allows free commercial use). Next, they say "it is important to note that any utilization of the project's components for commercial purposes necessitates separate licensing agreements" which directly conflicts with the legally binding Apache 2.0 License. If you want to use it, you have 2 choices. You can risk them suing you and use it or pay for a license. There is no third option.
Okay, subscribed. I'm gonna test ChatDev, see how easy it is to do more and how much can be done. I'll find: How far can it be pushed? How complicated can it go? How much can it automate?
y'all delusional as fk if u think thats the path were going, imagine if everyone can be a CEO cause u can build anything with AI, the economy will just collaps, everyone will just be able to build products of other companies lol.
we don't have to worry about replacing nancy, boe jiden and the rest of the cronies cuz they gonna be dead in a few years anyways and we can go see them in a museum along with the rest of the fossils but @@GetRealwithMike we can replace your mom
If you follow many of the AI "Thought Leaders," they are saying exactly that. The economy is in for a massive and inevitable shift with AI. As for people who "build products of other companies," most software is simply yet another copy of existing software. There are very, very few companies that create truly novel and innovative software. People are now able to create their own customized software at a very low cost. Because of this, many software companies will quickly become extinct. They simply won't be able to adapt minute by minute.
@@RicardoEBeck idk if we go that path where AI can do everything for everyone, governments will step in and prevent that, you think they want to lose their power and become simple humans like us ? And AI of today isnt really that good, can answer simple stuff and can get lost very quickly and try to bs its way out.
@@dan-cj1rr No doubt. The governments and "other powers that be" will want to remain in control. I think AI and other events will remove them from power. It will be interesting to see exactly how things unfold.
what a time to be alive. i love the back and forth between you two to clarify in simple terms. would be amazing to see more experiments with chat dev!
It's a game changer
Two minute papers
Damn, this is epic. Now, all I need to do is sit with some bright-minded people and ask them for software ideas they think can help them in the business.
Depends on your problems/what you want to automate, what you want to put out to the world.
We have been running an AI Start-up for a year now at RLVNT⚡✨
Having a team and employees is overrated now. We're just 3 people super productive and epic agency 🚀 We close high ticket clients, do some epic work, and expand through word of mouth.
Can I know more about it?
what's your website? would love to learn more!
You've said epic twice. Use synonyms
@@GEMSofGOD_com ah! Noted!
I have AI customers if anyone's interested.
I am, please share details??
Me too
Mee Too , Please share the details
Hii I am intrested please do tell me
I also interseted. Wow
hey , i have question how do you choiced the other terminal , what comand did you wrote , after you did the link ..
With this and some improvements, you could build a one Human company surrounded by many AI agents working for you to generate a product, affiliate, marketing, market analysis, game development, content creation… skys the limit
Will probably try that.
Virtual Software Company ❤
I stuck at step two, it wrote " conda js not recognised as an internal kr external command" what should i do
Nice, good luck
Heyy do I need to have gpt4 paid version to use this application?
how do we give it a document of information of web app, because off course one would not use to build a ping pong game, and instead would want to use it to build an actual useful product for which the prompt wont be as simple as "make me a ping pong game"
Yeah, probably need to get much more specific, do lots of iterations.
I'm gonna test that.
Can we use any other llm or like google palm api rather than open ai?
It works using OpenAI-style API, so you should be able to hack it to use it with local LLMs that can run a local OpenAI-style API
@@MayeulHP can you tell me more about this?
Wow how complex can we get?
why not 100 ai? why not 1000 ai employees? You wait and soon we will be running the idea through 100000 coder agents alone that are all slightly different, and overall getting a very efficient output (in terms of quality)....then run it through 100k quality expert agents...
I think doing it that way to capture the nuances is a faster way to better output rather than one large agent trying to be godlike.
If individual skillsets are an efficient way to combine 'ideas' for a better output in real life, why not add a SHIT LOAD more ai agents and get recursive and re-iterative about it. It should only refine your output.
If someone can come up with a way to have the similar agents NOT re-run the exact same parts in each individual that are producing identical output, but only their nuanced differences to save tokens, you could get far with it imo. Maybe after 100 iterations (arbitrary number) of the same chunk producing identical outputs, don't do it anymore and consider it an accepted truth. Don't run that part in future iterations and *assume* the outcome, within a range. You'd still get a bulk of nuanced takes giving you some intelligent variance, but admittedly you might lose a small percentage of random unique ways to solve a problem. Then down the road you keep analyzing which ways to 'solve x' are best. At a point you'd have a truth of sorts, after running many iterations through many different agents and getting the same thing. You can keep doing this refinement for parts of a much larger system and end up with a much more complex output.
Disclaimer, I know basically nothing. School me on these thoughts if they are stupid, please.
Nothing much more than party tricks
this is a startup?
Then why didn’t you get your entire ai company to make this video?
❤
link
You guys are great together as a team. I have a request. Please remake this with a free LLM instead of OpenAI. I paid a small fortune to OpenAI to create multiple agents to make my startup and it was an epic failure. Can this be done with opensource AI for free? Thanks
You'll need a lot of GPU to run the open source models which would be costlier than OpenAI is the scale is small.
You'll spend a lot on gpu unless you are willing to use castrated versions of LLMs.
मेरे अहंकार को नष्ट करो और मुझे अपने करीब लाओ, विद्या शिव।.
So much talk but what do you do?
#ChatDev is not free to use. If you read the license, you cannot use it commercially without paying. If you use it as an interesting toy, you don't have to pay. If you use it in any moneymaking activity, you'll need to pay.
They assert the code is licensed under the Apache 2.0 License (which allows free commercial use). Next, they say "it is important to note that any utilization of the project's components for commercial purposes necessitates separate licensing agreements" which directly conflicts with the legally binding Apache 2.0 License.
If you want to use it, you have 2 choices. You can risk them suing you and use it or pay for a license. There is no third option.
AI CPO sounds ironic !
Okay, subscribed.
I'm gonna test ChatDev, see how easy it is to do more and how much can be done.
I'll find:
How far can it be pushed?
How complicated can it go?
How much can it automate?
y'all delusional as fk if u think thats the path were going, imagine if everyone can be a CEO cause u can build anything with AI, the economy will just collaps, everyone will just be able to build products of other companies lol.
Can we replace Donald Trump and Congress?
we don't have to worry about replacing nancy, boe jiden and the rest of the cronies cuz they gonna be dead in a few years anyways and we can go see them in a museum along with the rest of the fossils but @@GetRealwithMike we can replace your mom
If you follow many of the AI "Thought Leaders," they are saying exactly that. The economy is in for a massive and inevitable shift with AI.
As for people who "build products of other companies," most software is simply yet another copy of existing software. There are very, very few companies that create truly novel and innovative software.
People are now able to create their own customized software at a very low cost. Because of this, many software companies will quickly become extinct. They simply won't be able to adapt minute by minute.
@@RicardoEBeck idk if we go that path where AI can do everything for everyone, governments will step in and prevent that, you think they want to lose their power and become simple humans like us ? And AI of today isnt really that good, can answer simple stuff and can get lost very quickly and try to bs its way out.
@@dan-cj1rr No doubt. The governments and "other powers that be" will want to remain in control. I think AI and other events will remove them from power. It will be interesting to see exactly how things unfold.