21. Bayesian Statistical Inference I

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 พ.ย. 2012
  • MIT 6.041 Probabilistic Systems Analysis and Applied Probability, Fall 2010
    View the complete course: ocw.mit.edu/6-041F10
    Instructor: John Tsitsiklis
    License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA
    More information at ocw.mit.edu/terms
    More courses at ocw.mit.edu

ความคิดเห็น • 45

  • @dania_884
    @dania_884 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    his teaching is rigorous, precise, strict and concise, to the point, helps me clarifying the cloudy understanding in statistics.

  • @EndureTemptation
    @EndureTemptation 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This is a very fitting explanation for me, hwo has studied statistics, but some time ago. This really clarifies things.

  • @philippe177
    @philippe177 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Excellent. It is so to the point and brilliant. It is like a diamond!

  • @MegaBeautysoul
    @MegaBeautysoul 10 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Excellent professor

  • @mrnettek
    @mrnettek 10 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Amazing! Thanks MIT and Professor.

  • @salaheamean
    @salaheamean 10 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    this prof. is just perfect. I wish he taught me...!!

  • @umbrellageeks9421
    @umbrellageeks9421 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Amazing class ! This had helped me a lot in my studies in statistics and probability for Artificial Intelligence. Thank you!!

  • @alinapol
    @alinapol 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    great lecture

  • @oglala_lakota2o
    @oglala_lakota2o 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i believe this particular professor has reached a level of understanding on bayesian inference that is referred to as hyper-sanity, this was a beautiful lecture, similar to classical music like panagini

  • @Gruemoth
    @Gruemoth 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    a very clear, no wishy washy lecture on Bayesian Statistical Inference

  • @markchambers9378
    @markchambers9378 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Seriously good lecture. Very thoughtful presentation.

    • @torincody8378
      @torincody8378 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      sorry to be so off topic but does anyone know a way to log back into an Instagram account??
      I was dumb lost my account password. I love any tricks you can give me.

    • @alessandronoel4289
      @alessandronoel4289 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Torin Cody Instablaster ;)

    • @torincody8378
      @torincody8378 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Alessandro Noel i really appreciate your reply. I found the site thru google and im in the hacking process now.
      I see it takes quite some time so I will reply here later with my results.

    • @torincody8378
      @torincody8378 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Alessandro Noel It worked and I actually got access to my account again. I'm so happy!
      Thanks so much, you really help me out !

    • @alessandronoel4289
      @alessandronoel4289 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Torin Cody glad I could help :)

  • @Bea_remembrance
    @Bea_remembrance 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video thanks will use information to finish my book

  • @Rainstorm121
    @Rainstorm121 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks Sir. Couldn't get well the big diff between posterior and prior distributions.

  • @zyzzyva57
    @zyzzyva57 10 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Excellent presentation...Start watching 10 minutes in
    ...Bayesian starts 18 minute in

  • @anyonetherealready
    @anyonetherealready 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    he is a legend

  • @melodyh5993
    @melodyh5993 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    couldn't be better.

  • @ayubaalim2201
    @ayubaalim2201 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very helpful

  • @nabilakdim2767
    @nabilakdim2767 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hi, Thank you for these nice videos.
    One small note : at 27:40, I think that to justify the use of uniform distribution for θ, one should use entropy, so given that uniform distribution (discrete r.v)/Guassian (continious r.v with a given 1st and 2nd moments) has the highest entropy, i.e the highest degree of randomness, if we estimate/detect θ assuming those distributions, the solution would be the best (in randomness sense, so lower probability of error maybe ?) also for other distributions based θ, given that those other distributions have lower degree of randomness.
    Cheers
    Nabil

  • @lemyul
    @lemyul 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks

  • @hanxiaoliu4941
    @hanxiaoliu4941 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thx Professor

  • @cemsavasaydn7053
    @cemsavasaydn7053 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    5:00 I would definitely use Support Vector Machine

    • @MrSinalta
      @MrSinalta 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not sure as SVM want to separate data in 2 separates cluster and this problem is not exactly of this type

  • @Palikpalik9964
    @Palikpalik9964 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Bayesian, yes bayesian..

  • @pramu_dithawickrama_tunga1672
    @pramu_dithawickrama_tunga1672 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Statistics is nothing else
    1.deviation
    2.mean
    Equals,
    Understanding primes
    Equals,
    The clay institute statement about riemann hypothesis:
    1.The PNT determines the average distribution of the primes.
    2.The riemann hypothesis tells us about the deviation from the average. Average mens statistical mean or 0
    Stochastic means 0
    Statistis means 0.
    Order means 1.

  • @aylinakkus7753
    @aylinakkus7753 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i am big Aylin

  • @tobiasfan5407
    @tobiasfan5407 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    His sniffling is making me sniffle

  • @jamespaz4333
    @jamespaz4333 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent accent

  • @mazensayed3250
    @mazensayed3250 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    opa el machine learning

  • @y031962
    @y031962 9 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Too much talk and not enough example. He doesn't not go through one single basic example to help understanding the subject. He just repeats what is said on intorduction to probablity by Dimitri Berteskas. Just read the book is just as good as watching this video. Unless u know the subject very well, I would not recommend watching the video

    • @PewPew4QQ
      @PewPew4QQ 9 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      This is MIT, not Univ of Podunktown.

    • @c_na_man
      @c_na_man 9 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      y031962 he is the co-author of that book.

    • @penny6724
      @penny6724 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +y031962 Have you ever read the book sly?

    • @jayquelin
      @jayquelin 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      dude ur just a bad who didnt study his probability theory

    • @christianjimenez1877
      @christianjimenez1877 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well. That's the MIT system. Moreover, you may say there are not questions. This is because it is a Lecture.
      Recitations and Tutorials complete the educational structure. However, this Lecture is clear and powerful.
      Professor Tsitsiklis has 45 minutes to communicate his ideas and does it in an excellent manner.