Sir it's a treat to watch and listen to you. I'm a first generation young lawyer and I learn a lot from you. Can you kindly suggest a comprehensive commentary on the Constitution of Pakistan 1973? It would be a great favour.
Sir, mostly the lawyers think according to their political determination but it's not good as this state of thoughts is misleading the mass/public. I appreciate your explanation without political influence. regards
Sir i heard and somewhere read that head of the constitutional bench will called Chief Justice of Pakistan and head of supreme court will called chief justice of supreme only. Is it true?
@@maqsimillion oh really it does not then ? politicians will now decide which judge will hear which case. They will decide which judge will now be the cjp in other words judges will be busy in pleasing their handlers. How can anyone in the world can justify such amendments by an illegitimate parliment
@@Cine95 i do agree this part needs to be challenged and set aside. i don't have much of an issue with who appoints judges. the devil will be in the details. how the commission handles the benches. if it is a one time or sporadic and non case specific thing, then may be acceptable (but even then not). if used to micromanage, then yes, there is an issue. once again let's see how the SC deals with it or will it be the constitutional bench. i am not sure regarding your illegitamacy of parliament argument. the voting did not rely on the disputed member seats i believe. let's see if this makes for less or more turbulence.
@@maqsimillion do you really think it is a wise decision to allow politicians to select judges for benches and selecting the cjp ? Don’t you think it’s quite obvious that the judge who shows biasness towards the government will be automatically elected as the cjp ? What about the separation of powers in the constitution; this is clearly violated by this amendment. Regarding the parliament we all know who gets them in. It’s the military establishment. This parliament got elected on form 47; how the heck can they be even allowed to make such amendments. 2 sentors of bnp were abducted by the agencies and they suddenly came to sight in the parliament lodges and voted against their party. 5 members of pti also voted in the favour. So this parliament is illegitimate in both aspects
@@Cine95 cjp yes, same in the US. cj us can come from outside SC even. Out of 3 is a decent mechanis. for appointment of benches i do have a problem with the role of the commission dominated by politicians, but then again it is representative. As regards the rest of the stuff you mention, i do not agree. the 5 members who voted with suffer the consequences under law. i did not agree with the 63 A judgment and that wrong has been corrected correctly. parliament is no less legitimate than any earlier one.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 91 | คู่เอก "คมอาวุธ vs อเล็กเซย์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/V0RkEfYFsgM/mqdefault.jpg)
![แฉกลโกงงานวัด 2024 [ โกงมั้ยครับ ep.106 ] | DOM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/taC5dpP3HXA/mqdefault.jpg)
Sir it's a treat to watch and listen to you. I'm a first generation young lawyer and I learn a lot from you. Can you kindly suggest a comprehensive commentary on the Constitution of Pakistan 1973? It would be a great favour.
Honoured. Ahmer fazeel is good but outdated.
Ahmer fazeel is good but outdated.
@@maqsimillion thank you sir.
@@hussnainbaqar2000 welcome
Sir, mostly the lawyers think according to their political determination but it's not good as this state of thoughts is misleading the mass/public. I appreciate your explanation without political influence. regards
Thanks for it my dear bro ❤ always wait for your precious talk
welcome
Very well explained. Thank you for creating such informative videos
@@bilalrawn8881 welcome
Sir i heard and somewhere read that head of the constitutional bench will called Chief Justice of Pakistan and head of supreme court will called chief justice of supreme only. Is it true?
@@shahidgill9952 no basis here.
No it was the head of constitutional court who will be called as cjp of Pakistan. This amendment was rejected by mulana
@@Cine95 name doesnt psrticularly matter, the powers do.
@@maqsimillion yes the first draft of that amendment made constitutional as the top court
Dear sir,kindly upload videos regarding civil judge preparation .
have uploaded a couple here: soundcloud.com/momin-282665820
Overall this Amendment destroys the independence of judiciary
how?
@@maqsimillion oh really it does not then ? politicians will now decide which judge will hear which case. They will decide which judge will now be the cjp in other words judges will be busy in pleasing their handlers. How can anyone in the world can justify such amendments by an illegitimate parliment
@@Cine95 i do agree this part needs to be challenged and set aside. i don't have much of an issue with who appoints judges. the devil will be in the details. how the commission handles the benches. if it is a one time or sporadic and non case specific thing, then may be acceptable (but even then not). if used to micromanage, then yes, there is an issue. once again let's see how the SC deals with it or will it be the constitutional bench.
i am not sure regarding your illegitamacy of parliament argument. the voting did not rely on the disputed member seats i believe.
let's see if this makes for less or more turbulence.
@@maqsimillion do you really think it is a wise decision to allow politicians to select judges for benches and selecting the cjp ? Don’t you think it’s quite obvious that the judge who shows biasness towards the government will be automatically elected as the cjp ? What about the separation of powers in the constitution; this is clearly violated by this amendment.
Regarding the parliament we all know who gets them in. It’s the military establishment. This parliament got elected on form 47; how the heck can they be even allowed to make such amendments.
2 sentors of bnp were abducted by the agencies and they suddenly came to sight in the parliament lodges and voted against their party. 5 members of pti also voted in the favour.
So this parliament is illegitimate in both aspects
@@Cine95 cjp yes, same in the US. cj us can come from outside SC even. Out of 3 is a decent mechanis. for appointment of benches i do have a problem with the role of the commission dominated by politicians, but then again it is representative.
As regards the rest of the stuff you mention, i do not agree. the 5 members who voted with suffer the consequences under law. i did not agree with the 63 A judgment and that wrong has been corrected correctly.
parliament is no less legitimate than any earlier one.
Dear respected sir your voice demanding medicine 💊 plz take rest and sleep.
main aisa hi hoon :) voice is fine.
@@maqsimillionاللّٰہ تعالیٰ اپکو اپنے حفظ و امان میں رکھے آمین ثم آمین 🤲