Mandamus writ (99.99%). Quo-warranto isn't possible because it's only related to question on the appointment done by govt. Prohibition & certiorari writs are related to only judiciary. And habious corpus is related to "presenting the body before court of law". Then the answer is. "MANDAMUS" writ.
Sir if companies don't have fundamental rights then how could union govt violate article 14(Right to equality) - Regarding selective nationalisation of 14 banks only on the basis of deposits /// 14:20 onwards
Companies do not come within the purview of 'citizens', but they are considered to be juristic persons and hence can claim all those fundamental rights which are available to persons, but not those expressly made available to citizens. Hence, Article 14 would apply in case of companies since the wording goes "The State shall not deny to any *person*..."
Sir thanks for your help through these videos. I am also want to know that - After 370 and 35A The applicability of laws is whole of India (except j&k) is applicable or not? It very confusing me 😌 Please sir reply जरूर कीजिए. Thanks again Dear sir
Sir please make the video immediately on New Horizon Limited vs Union of india case. Because this case is very difficult nd then I can't understand. So please sir make video on this case.
Your explanation of violation of article 14 is confusing as you said fundamental rights are not for companies and you said that govt has not given equal treatment to all BANKS is violation of article 14...Kindly Explain.
Excellent explanation and deep research...i request you to upload all landmark judgements.. really helpful for law students 😊
Namaste I’m korean boy! 🇰🇷
I like your video 💜🙏🏻✨
And I love india 🇮🇳❤️❤️❤️
Hi..
Good morning sir
We love Korean dramas ❤
🤣
bro this is not indian street food video what you're doing here .
Haha love you to
Mandamus writ (99.99%).
Quo-warranto isn't possible because it's only related to question on the appointment done by govt.
Prohibition & certiorari writs are related to only judiciary.
And habious corpus is related to "presenting the body before court of law".
Then the answer is. "MANDAMUS" writ.
Please discuss more cases like it ......it's wonderful explanation ....waiting for rest cases over ordinance and act and amendments
सर आपने इस कान्सेप्ट को बहुत ही अच्छे तरीके से समझाया है। बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद सर आपकों....
Pura India ke bestest video, wah sir. Wah sir
Tussi grt ho
sir please start a series of important judgements of SC for upsc
One thing I would say
Bhaiya aap samjhate bahut ache se hai...
Gratitude and blessings to u sir
Your delivery and preciseness and choice of words are really wonderful. You just made it understand in a very simple language. Thank you Sir!
to the point explanation. Thanks Sir
Wow sir great lecture ever i have watched.
Awesome explanation 😊👍
Awesome Lecture Sir
Very helpful sir. Thank you so much!!
Nicely explained 👍
Great sir🙏🙏❤
Nice explanation. I liked....
Bahut shandar tarike se bataya aappne
Thank you very much sir 🙏🙏
Sir if companies don't have fundamental rights then how could union govt violate article 14(Right to equality) - Regarding selective nationalisation of 14 banks only on the basis of deposits /// 14:20 onwards
Companies do not come within the purview of 'citizens', but they are considered to be juristic persons and hence can claim all those fundamental rights which are available to persons, but not those expressly made available to citizens. Hence, Article 14 would apply in case of companies since the wording goes "The State shall not deny to any *person*..."
@@sudarshanb.k5513
Thanks bro 👍
Hlo sir plz provide more videos on important case laws of different subjects
Absolutely perfect
Amazing explanation sir 😊
Nice explanation
Very very helpful sir!🙏❤️✨
Loved the session.... +1 in the subscribers.
sir , i like ur video .
Very helpful sir🙏 thank you
Certiorari or quo warranto
Sir if company is an artificial person then how can it be prohibited to go in court & enjoying fundamental rights.
Their representative can go in the court n FR can be enforced by a natural person only.
Sir thanks for your help through these videos.
I am also want to know that -
After 370 and 35A
The applicability of laws is whole of India (except j&k) is applicable or not?
It very confusing me 😌
Please sir reply जरूर कीजिए.
Thanks again Dear sir
Yesssssssssss, according to the declaration of union minister Amit Sah...
Very informative, thank u sir
Writ of certiorari?
Thank you sir
Mandamus❤
Amazing 👍
Thanku so much sir 🙏
Alot of thanks sir, sir apse request hai sabhi amendment ko outline discussion provide kra digiye
President was V.V.Giri then right?
sir plz explain PA Inamdar vs State of Maharashtra. Thank you.
Thanks 🙌
Quo warranto
Sir please make the video immediately on New Horizon Limited vs Union of india case. Because this case is very difficult nd then I can't understand. So please sir make video on this case.
💓
Useful
Sir can u give one lecture on introduction part on crpc
Hi..
Good morning sir..
More videos uploaded sir
sir please make a vedio on union bank of india vs khader international construction
I really need a vedio
sor please ek vedio farmers protest
Sc ki jo judgement govt Ko na pasand aye use amendment kr do
Fir fyada kya itna kuch krne ka
Artcle 19 kese aya isme
Your explanation of violation of article 14 is confusing as you said fundamental rights are not for companies and you said that govt has not given equal treatment to all BANKS is violation of article 14...Kindly Explain.
Writ of mandamus
Sir please can you upload English videos
Under quo warranto
4_ cercerotry rit
Write pition of habeas corpus🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋
Yo
Biggest Blunder of India, and Worst mistake of Indira Gandhi : Nationalisation of Banks
How?
Haebus corpus
Mandamus
Vv giri was the acting president.... hidayatullah is after that become president i guess
Habeus corpus
It's for produce a body
Quo warronto
Sir speak fully in english dont use hindi
Wow sir great lecture ever i have watched.
Quo warranto
Mandamus
Quo warranto
Mandamus