Unreal Royalties Cut From 5% to 3.5%! But...
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ต.ค. 2024
- At Unreal Fest in Seattle, along side the announcement of Unreal Engine 5.5 preview, they also announced Launch Everywhere With Epic. This program enables you to reduce your royalty rate for Unreal Engine from 5% to 3.5% (after the first million as normal), but there is a catch. There is always a catch...
Key Links
gamefromscratc...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Support : / gamefromscratch
GameDev News : gamefromscratc...
GameDev Tutorials : devga.me
Discord : / discord
Twitter : / gamefromscratch
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
![เปิดบ้าน พี่ตูน Bodyslam หลังใหม่คนแรก ที่ภูเก็ต l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/flFwcmyDQSk/mqdefault.jpg)
Key Links
gamefromscratch.com/unreal-engine-launch-everywhere-with-epic/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Support* : www.patreon.com/gamefromscratch
*GameDev News* : gamefromscratch.com
*GameDev Tutorials* : devga.me
*Discord* : discord.com/invite/R7tUVbD
*Twitter* : twitter.com/gamefromscratch
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"if your game makes a million dollars" LOL
I wouldn't mind paying those 5 %.
yea... I have been considering jumping into Unreal after the trouble with Unity and now Godot going woke broke and massing banning anyone that won't worship them.
Eh, idk man, you don't get the whole million dollar is a thing, also 5% of a million is already 50k. As far as I know, that's a year worth of salary for many ppl. Accounting for taxes and the cost to make games, I could see why some might hesitate to pay the royalty
@@laikhoabang It's 5% AFTER the first million. You get the whole million.
@@indexius AND you need to keep sending Epic your bank account info 2-3 times a year afterwards, just to prove how much you've earned.
It's outright dangerous scam for lone devs.
@@GugureSux sure, I'll do it if I earn 1 million with Unreal. Easiest choice of my life.
Smart move made by Epic instead of trying to get people to make a game an Epic Exclusive they're encouraging people to make sure their games AREN'T a Steam (or console) exclusive.
and it's incentivizing rather than punishing. this method of lowering the cost for putting it on Epic store is better than what they could have done: raising the cost for anywhere other than Epic store. That would have been a shitstorm if they did that
If I was able to release UE5 game I would make it Epic store exclusive out of respect for Epic, they released such amazing engine for free and made it open source.
There's no such thing as a Steam exclusive.
An exclusive is a title where the developers or publishers CANNOT by contract publish to other platforms.
If the devs/publishers just refuse to publish to other platforms, but aren't bound to do that by contract, then they're not exclusives.
The only exception to this is when the publisher and the platform are the same entity (like Sony creating playstation exclusive games), which Valve does not do (every Valve first party game is multi platform).
@@meyes1098 "An exclusive is a title where the developers or publishers CANNOT by contract"
No, having a contract is *WHY* something can be exclusive but there can be other reasons *WHY* something is exclusive. A developer/publisher CHOOSING not to put their title on any other platform except one is another reason *WHY* something is exclusive, because either way it's still *EXCLUSIVE TO* the platform (i.e. the ONLY place you can get the game).
Steam is a rip off. People should get together and demand they lower their price to 10% of sales.
As someone thai is working on a game with a with a character creator.
The Mutable plugin that they showed off is such a time saver.
Especially not having to worry about pants clipping into footwear and auto hiding the clipping parts of clothing.
Correction with the royalties:
You are charged 5% on the revenue ABOVE 1 million.
You make $1,000,010
You owe them $0.50 ($10.00 * 0.05)
Learn count
Yes, the first million is free
Wow, that's even better for that pie in the sky 😆
@@YansPLlearn to count*
That's already what the video said. He said the first million is free. Making a million after that you'd bay 50k. Ect
ect. Now, that's changing to 3.5% if you release on epic simultaneously. 🤨
tbh that sound reasonable and it is just good
But as demonstrated a year ago, executives may demand to raise it at any time with zero warning. Never going back.
Yea in the long run both Unreal and Unity will have similar pricing (as they both are competitors). But it doesn't hurt to have working knowledge of both.
Ironically I left Unreal for Unity. That's twice I've been kicked in the teeth. If it ain't open source I'm not interested.
One thing to mention, Unreal is different. Pricing and licensing is locked to versions. So if you build on 5.5, the license and pricing for 5.5 stays in effect. They did that to prevent price jumps on in-development titles.
Unity on the other hand did just increase pricing for non-games by a whopping 2.5x overnight (mandatory - and retroactive) a few years ago. Got rid of their cheap tier. And now price increased the pro tier, mandatory, regardless of the version you are on.
Definitely makes someone want to be refocusing on open source...
@@avp2501 No open source engine is good enough as of now. Godot is bare bones and over-complicates things. Also, recently it went into politics so not sure about its future. Others dont even have basic 3D functionality.
I think it's better to ignore the licensing and pricing part. Most likely the game we're building will fail as most indie games fail. If by 0.1% chance we get a hit and become millionare it'll not hurt you in any way to give unity or unreal engine some small percentage of money.
We should focus on speed of development, time to market and our game as a product. The licensing part is for future if we make it as successful indie dev with multiple hits.
@@kipa_chu Considering that what I'm making is 100% free, royalties don't come into the equation.
that sound unreal
(•_•)
( •_•)>⌐□-□
(⌐□_□)
What's unreal is that this unoriginal joke still gets spammed years later 😂
@@DeavtheDev well is hard to be creative .
@@kinrechoo3183 I see 🤣
I don't know why Am commenting this suddenly but....
Thank you Mike,,
Thank you for introducing me to Game dev and Other Software techs.
I don’t believe the vast majority of indie game developers have to worry about paying any percentage, large or small.
* Bottom 13% of Steam games are free.
*14% of paid games have earned less than $1,000 in their lifetime.
*Almost half of Steam games have never made more than $5,000.
*Only 25% of the games have made more than $50,000.
*Top 10% of games or c. 3,100 games on Steam have made more than $430,000. We’re now getting into really successful indie game and AA and AAA games territory.
*The top 1% of Steam games make more than $25,000,000 per game on Steam alone.
100%
This is a hobby for most of us, a pipe dream for many of us, and a successful money-making "job" for very very very very very few of us.
Only thing a dev really needs to worry about is "Can i make something cool and enjoy making it." with luck, others will think it's cool as well. that's as much success as most people can ever hope for.
yea only 1% gonna pay it, but 100% of game devs dream about success and this statement tells them: "if you get lucky and succeed we wil ask you for 3.5%", compare it to: "if you get lucky and succeed we will bankrupt you with our new runtime fee", from unity.
@@MEMUNDOLOL yah there is nothing wrong with dreaming, and for those very few who hit the million revenue mark, less royalties is better than more royalties, for sure.
Thanks for the reality check. Time for my procrastination.
There's a huge amount of shovelware or gamejam games on Steam, it skews the statistics towards the bottom. Go look at the bottom 15% of games on SteamDB, and tell me that most of them don't deserve to be there. The odds are better if you put any sort of effort on your games. Not saying you'll make a million but only really really bad and low effort games tend to go below $1000(or games that aren't putting in marketing effort to gain wishlists, but even those do go above $1000 if your stuff is eyecatching enough to get 10 positive reviews on its own)
I'm good on the UEFN stuff. Speaking for myself, i have no interest unless it applies to the engine proper as well
Good for those able to run Unreal Engine. Mine keeps crashing in Windows, and installing it in Linux is a pain for no reason. Epic could really invest in some stability and ease of use...
Right
installing it on Linux is very easy from my experience (unlike a couple years ago) it's very very buggy though and misses a couple features which is the main reason i still dualboot windows
So, the battle against Steam isn't going as smoothly as they thought, hum
Singing up for FAB has been a pain, have to dox myself 4 times with same info over and over
you ABSOLUTELY need to start covering UEFN. You need to understand, LEGO fortnite was made in UEFN. So LEGO has their own LEGO editor in house, which means we're going to be getting something like it soon. A LEGO builder game made with UEFN/UE5. You're going to see more like this. LEGO Roblox, and LEGO Minecraft are already a thing. I guarantee you LEGO makes the first move into the metaverse using Unreal. UEFN is the very beginning of the metaverse.
Edit: ...aaaaand TMNT x Fortnite.
The problem is not the percentage; the problems are: 1. They can change it to whatever percentage they like; 2. The CEO can also change someday; 3. Tencent, a big shareholder, bows to the CCP and censorship. These risks make Unreal not suitable for any long-term projects.
"big butt, I cannot lie" 😂 I see what you did there
I am going for O3DE instead.
why ? can you give a reason other than because it is open source
O3DE still not complete. Choose stability first. Take another game engine or....
Use Frameworks.
i think it would be a good idea to cover uefn on the channel because epic said they aim to make ue and uefn be as similar as possible. also some feature come to uefn before ue such as the scene graph.
I thought they pulled percentage to the 12%. I'm definitely in !
Fundamentally Tim Sweeney's plan is based on the understanding that no game lasts forever and one day the Fortnite well will dry up. The only way to really sit on a forever-sustainable position is to make a store like Steam, and that is exactly what Gaben understood almost 2 decades ago, that why we never got Episode 3. Stores > games as businesses. Like I said in the previous comment, everything Tim is doing here is pretty wise, he is trying to make the Epic Store emerge as a Steam competitor.
It's also why Nintendo will never make peripherals.
Why tf would you want to give up 30% of every sale ever made for a platform?
"Oh but Nintendo's so good at making games but their hardware underperforms"
Yeah no sh but you literally can't lose money when you own the whole freaking casino and the nostalgia blinded pokemorons.. of which I am one of them, but haven't picked up a game since Platinum x.x
It's a great and fair change, really cornering the industry ,but in the most pleasant standards ever offered.
Paying for developers to publish exclusively on Epic doesn't work, that's why they are offering only benefits now. Will get them a bunch of data to sell because of EOS.
This is great news and would make me want to release on EGS, i definitely wouldn't want to use the Epic First Run unless their was a cash incentive as i feel exclusivity on the PC market really can hurt a games sales. I know i have personally boycotted games that only release on EGS before because i want to discourage the exclusivity mindset that is so prevalant in the console market.
Just curious, why is your channel name gamesfromscratch when you mostly post about game engines? :)
the channel has tutorials on how to make games from scratch
@@TsukatsukiRio I thought from scratch meant to write a game without an engine but perhaps its more plainly "make a game"
@nights312312 yea
@@nights312312he just kept the name
Varying degrees of "scratch". Like making a game using only assembly language would be a pain in the butt for sure. He has videos on some game frameworks like Raylib. But that's probably as far down the stack he'll go. Another question one could ask is why doesn't he feature more news from the "Scratch" game engine?
After the Unity thing last year I get worried about investing in Unreal, however they have not disapointed yet!
Hey Mike, I'd like to watch your UEFN coverage, especially it's business model side. Like, how realistic would it be to get an OK revenue there with a good map for an indie dev? I heard Epic changed their payouts calculation system not in favor of UEFN creators recently, and there was a lot of unhappiness about that, as the revenue dropped significantly. Also, people complain that the map discoverability is quite poor inside Fortnite, there's lots of spammy maps, and that there are even cases of maps theft. I would be interested in your takes on this ecosystem and it's significant updates.
Simply doesn’t worth it, epic store simples doesn’t sell games, everyone there just to play free games, no one buys shit there, the 1.5% you will earn more if you publish on steam tbh
Considering each platform will earn 1m, Ps,Xbox,PC, 3m total, this 1.5% is equal to 45k, will epic sell 1million? Probably not, But if they release on all pc store fronts, xbox and playstation the 1.5% will be meaningless
I'd like to point out that opening links in iOS via Launch URL is broken on iOS 18 because they haven't updated the API use they for years... Unity updated it in 2022, so Unreal for iOS kind of sucks at times. Seriously tempted to just port my game to Unity.
The source is available. Get the source and change the api yourself. Or make PR.
Could be a good thing for mobile gamers, seems like a incentive to develop to those.
It depend on the services. As long it reduce time to release. Plus if staff handle some network code stuff. Just guess work.
Medium but and as such not to my liking. At least they're only asking for parity and not insisting you release first on their store, to be fair.
With the epic first run, you dont pay the 100 bucks per game? Its all free?
If that´s the case, that´s cool.
Why is no one talking about NANITE SKELITAL MESHES???
No fair, what about my VR game? Can’t say it will run in all devices.
does anyone know if the fab store let's you keep the original license you bought your assets with in unreal marketplace? great news though from 5 to 3.5% is amazing!
I'm pretty sure that if you made the purchase in unreal marketplace and it processed completely, the license should remain intact in perpetuity. It wouldn't make sense for so many devs to have to re-buy every asset they ever purchased on marketplace.
exclusive deals with Epic going to play well in court when they go against Apple regarding the iOS store.
Apples and oranges. Exclusive deals aren't forced. The devs have a choice in that. They aren't stopping devs from publishing on steam if they really want to.
There is no choice if you want to dev for iOS.
Assets bought on the Fab store are only for use in Unreal?
They’ve been clear that Fab won’t be exclusive to Unreal.
My guess is that content that moved over from UE Marketplace and stays on that license will be Unreal Exclusive, but assets with Fab license will across softwares
That’s not really a big but I expected a much juicier but. Maybe not Sir Mix-a-Lot level.
It sounds good, I'm just to lazy to learn c++ and translate my custom c# libraries to it.
chat GPT doing an ok job of it for me.
with generative AI getting more advanced everyday. FAB is going to punish creators instead of help them.
Smart move by Tim. He will lose money on the royalties instead of losing money paying for exclusives. That is a best way to use their budget because this is trying to normalize the practice of releasing in all stores at the same time. HOWEVER, I predict many games still won't do it. Steam promotes your game on their recommendations and lists based on the amount of SALES your game has so, the number one way to get more attention on the Steam store is to have large sales spikes. Selling in two stores day 1 would diminish this effect, potentially affecting overall sales.
Can someone clear something up for me? So if you make multiple games on unreal and only one of them gets an annual gross revenue of 1 Million does the cut come from all of your games or just the million dollar one?
Each game is calculated separately. If only one break the $1 mil barrier, you only pay for that one. If all your game break $1 mil, you need to pay for all of them.
@@SylvanFeanturi thanks for clarifying that
Please keep this in mind, the revenue applies to the LIFETIME revenue of each individual game.
So, if over 10 years, exactly one game slowly makes 1 million dollars, and in the 11th year surpassing the threshold, then you've got to start sending 5% or (3.5%) to epic of anything above that forever after. And I believe they require quarterly disbursements. So 4 times a year you'll pay them what you owe.
Ahhhh, it's FAB...
I no wonder when I did voice search I got questionable content....
I don't understand with the u-haul everything to Fab.. why..?
feels like unnecessary..
Actually, the move to Fab makes a lot of sense from Epic's point of view. First, Fab will bring in customers from different engines as well as different fields (like artists that render scenes in Blender, Maya, 3D Coat, etc.) This is because the assets on Fab won't be locked to the use of the Unreal Engine. Because of the increased traffic from this wider range of customers, this will also draw in _sellers_ from these other engines or industries. Right now the Unreal Engine Marketplace is, of course, only catering to UE developers/users and will only draw creators from this same developer pool.
Second, and more important to Epic, is that Fab will draw developers away from Unity due to the 88/12 revenue split on Fab. I believe that Unity's store still has a 70/30 split, so developing your Unity plugin or asset pack and selling it on Fab will be more financially viable. Unity really relies on the revenue from their asset store...not exclusively, but I'm sure it makes up a sizable chunk of their revenue. Epic is probably hoping that they can lure a reasonable percentage of developers away from the Unity Asset Store and rob Unity of the revenue that they would have received from those sales. To my limited understanding, Gadot doesn't have an official asset store, so maybe Epic is hoping that Fab can become the de facto Gadot asset store by virtue of having so many assets and allowing Gadot developers to monetize their work on a large platform with a lot of traffic. But mainly, I believe this move is all about sticking it to Unity.
Third, and probably the least impactful but the most touted by Epic's marketing, is that consolidating everything into one market will reduce Epic's running costs. This will be trumpeted as a way to save money and pass that savings onto the customers and developers, but I believe the second reason I gave is the true reason for this move. But, to be fair, consolidating everything into one market *_will_* save Epic money, so I don't think this is a lie.
Sorry for the long post. This is something that I've been thinking about since the announcement that Megascans will no longer be free for UE developers and would be moved to Fab. These are just my thoughts; I don't have any insider information to back this up.
@@TheRabidgoalie wow.. thanks man, I can see what their goal now
it's really a battlefield out there for major game engines.. you got to best your opponent, always one step ahead
i would like UEFN content , but not as frequent .
I will rather just publish my game on epic for the first 6 months and then release it on steam for the rest.
Seems like a good deal to me, and you should be porting any prefessionally made game to all platforms anyway. Not doing so would like be shooting yourself in the foot. I'd understand if your game is too technical for game consoles, but lately that is not really any issue now is it? Maybe if you planned on porting to Nintendo's consoles 😂
People that will never reach 1 million USD in sales and will never launch a project rushing to UE5 are prob rushing to Unreal after abandoning some other engine for the 5953395th time
not for everybody, Myanmar etc can not
-1 on UEFN 👎
ngl
I like this move
You really said 5% fee applies on the first million? This is not how tax brackets work, and this was a good chance to educate people on how tax brackets actually work, since so many don't understand it. 5% and now 3.5% is applied on everything AFTER 1 mill, excluding this 1 mill completely. You would pay 50k only after earning 2 mill.
He literally said you get the first million free. Like, he speaks fast, but he said it very clearly.
His words were, you get the first million free then if you make 1 million dollars...
He's attempting to say then if you make 1 million dollars after the first million which is free. He speaks fast, and most people know that already, so he skimmed over it. But, he wasn't wrong, he just wasn't as clear as some people needed.
Agressive. Cannot say I don't like it.
They're smelling blood. 😅
I just wish they would start triming the fat of the UE editor - my laptop can hardly run it
That's a good thing, my work machine easily outpaces the editor. The result is I can crash the editor ten times an hour now instead of only 3. Epic need to seriously invest in the stability of the editor and completely refactor UMG.
Something that might help you: in the editor console do t.MaxFPS 20 or something. Lowering the FPS causes it to chunk less when you're trying to do stuff.
Sounds like Godot might suit you better then.
It’s incredibly lightweight, pretty sure the core engine is only like 50MB or so!
Flax is also super fast. It's impressive.
Damn, Unreal Engine is unreal now, and that "BUT" you spoke of, is completely okay and nothing wrong with it.
Should you learn unreal or godot? I would say unreal is better choice, especially after all the shenanigans godot organization they showed us last week.
what shenanigans? you mean the moderator thing?
@@InsaneAlphaBeta what else? the main developers are siding with her/it.
@@RebelliousX I’d still say use Godot, despite being someone that would publicly pi no chet wo kest ers if I was in charge.
It’s just more lightweight and is genuinely open-source, so no sign-ins required and forks are allowed.
There’s already a fork called Redot if the com mie nonsense is too much for you.
And for the record Unreal is like that too, but they go so far as to enforce it in the engine code!
@@RebelliousX Again your being vague, what are you talking about? what happened?
@@liquidsnakex I kind of agree, buy it is sad that we have to censor our (the majority) voices and talk in puzzles to appease the 1 or 2 in the minority.
are you going to do a video about Redot ?
That shit is dead. Godot, Redot and whatever fork comes next.
If it takes off, yes. For now, no.
@shinobi1975 godot isn't dead, but Redot on the other hand...
@@shinobi1975 i don't wish for that
I suspect it won’t be sustainable in its current state. Their official tweets are already causing a stir, with the risk of repeating the same mistakes as the original. There are so many things they need to prove to demonstrate their sustainability. Might be best to wait for at least a month.
Unity have a 0% revenue share.... so if 5% is "Very generous" how would you describe Unity's pricing? Oh yeh, that's right, you said ""remember that really stupid thing they did a year ago with the runtime fee, well they got rid of that".
This channel should be called, Unreal Fanboy, because the reporting is very biased!!
He's quite fair. Watch the Unity videos, he's covered it too. And while I do prefer Unity myself, it's not 100% free. It's misrepresenting it to act like it's just paying 0% of anything ever. It just has a different pricing style.
It's simply amazing how I'm a Godot fanyboy, a Unity fanboy and an Unreal fanboy depending on the video comment section I'm currently reading...
Plus it's not the 5% part that was "very generous" it's 5% after $1,000,000 earned...
This is good
Got it. Unreal royalties are as clear as mud and it all depends on x, y, z. I think I'll stick to something that doesn't change it's T&S as often as the weather
What an absurd reaction to a change that is ONLY positive for developers.
say whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Why UE cut smaller percentage? because people need to pay for rent, gas, electric, housing, new housing, employees, etc.
Number of game developers died of developing games due to Sleep deprivation or missed game deadline.
Myself as game developer. I don't even remember who won 2010-2019 MLB World Series championship. not even football. Let me ask you question, who won 2023 Super Bowl? how about 2024? Me.... I don't remember....I tried. it makes me burst into tears. it's long work. People would get upset.... The work is unforgiven....
You might be overworking... (Also I don't care about sports? Weird assumption that it's important to everyone)
You should probably take breaks and take it easier. Also I doubt Unreal cares about your bills, they have their own reasons
Personally, i don't think it really matters what PC sales platform one publishes to, at least for the most part.
Since it costs about a hundred USD to publish a typical game, on a typical porthole.
What us nobody's need to focus on is marketing. lol
Why did they do this? Aren't already enough companies using UE? Do they want it to be THE universal engine used by everyone?
unreal is going in the good direction ? what you mean ?
I think it is all irrelevant to your channel viewers as no one will make more than a million anyway.
That is a good move for Unreal to do after with the Godot incident. However if they pull a woke political move then they will also suffer.
Have you ever heard of the unreal coding standard? If you don't like woke, you're better off not using the engine
EDIT: I'm not saying epic coding standard is bad. I'm just pointing out the hypocritical nature of this comment.
@@mrtegs Yeah, I was learning Unreal until I saw that shit. Unistalled.
I think that only applies if your coding the Engine itself like plug-ins and such.
guys please save yourself from godot.
,today after opening godot I suddenly grew a pair of boobs, idk how, maybe its just that woke, now I suddenly want to play the sims 4.
@@blacksage81 It is enforce for internal but not your own project. my statement is it is just a good move for unreal to do this right after people are leaving godot.
The Godot incident was unfortunate. I wish godot was open source with a free lisnce so we could do with the software whatever we want without being tied to corporation that inject politics into our product. Oh wait...
Good bye unity.
As long as you put LGBTQ characters in your game you don't have to pay anything.
I dont know why more devs don't use unreal? Is it corporate or mainstream or something I don't get it.
The freedom to choose whatever you want.
I guess it is the bloat and C++. Many prefer C# and a lightweight core that runs on low end hardware and mobile well. That is why most indies go with Unity.
Unreal is overkill for some projects. Too complex, too many features, too much time spent in testing systems and mechanics and knowledge transfer/ training. Hiring experts is pricey. Unreal games also start feeling samey.
@@jefreestyles Complaining about having too many features seems sillty. Just use the stuff you need. How is Unreal more complex to use when it is far easier to achieve high quality stuff and visuals? Imagine all the things and quirks you have to do to achieve good lighting in Unity compared to Unreal.
I'm tempted to switch from Unreal to Unity because their iOS support kind of really sucks at times and they have broken things they haven't fixed in years. So if you care about iOS Unreal is kind of a major pain.
Please don't cover UEFN content ♥
Why? To limit his audience, this doesn't make sense.
I think he should do market research to evaluate if it's worth his time and effort to appeal to that market. If he does UEFN, he should also look into doing Roblox and even Minecraft. IMHO, he would need at least 1 other person to help him. There's a ton of content in these other "game engines". Might be worth it though.
There's a good chance he will hurt the algorithm if subscribers skip videos. I doubt many people who are interested in creating "games from scratch" are here for UEFN
So they dropped the royalty fee, but aren't they now charging on Fab?
So either way they are getting their money.
Well, they need to get money somehow xD
0:30
This is mostly a (White) dev community, so the joke is likely missed or unappreciated.
My Black ass, however, loves it.
You think Whites don't like big butts?
Man, most of milleniums and previous generation heard the song xD
@@Vondoraexactly. Its a classic, all shades of butts agree.
Godot 🔥
Me hace gracia la gente que va saltando de engine en engine como buscando una especie de engine santo, inocente. Me importa un pito el rollo LGTB ese, me mola godot y ese rollo simplemente es algo en lo que no me involucro y no me va a impedir seguir usando godot. En fin cada uno a la suya.
bro the amt of pissy people crying abt woke in the comments is so annoying 😭😭. stfu I just wanna hear opinions abt UE5's new decisions, not hateful shit abt me I get enough of that in regular life 🙄. Is this really what the community's become smh
You have a skewed idea of what it's about. You're a victim of misinformation. People having different political beliefs does not automatically equate to hating anyone with this or that orientation. They have you believing that all this or that type of people are part of their party or else they're some kind of traitors or have "internalized" something-ism, but that's not how it works. Not all gay people for example agree with that stuff. They try to make it like "all women are part of our group!" and that just very obviously is not the case, and the same goes for others. When you tie these things together, you take hits that weren't even aimed at you. They have you feeling like anyone that disagrees is a hateful enemy, all for their political gain, without care for how it affects you personally. All they care about is your vote, and they don't care if they make you live in fear or with mistrust - it only benefits them.
(Not that there aren't people who are both associated things, on both sides, but separate things are separate things.)
Stop trying to make Epic Game Store happen. It's not going to happen.
OK Google
You know you have the choice to not use their store right? Having more than one store is a good thing. Right now Steam is a better place than epic store for sure, but Gabe will not live forever the next steam CEO could be an asshole and having all the power of the PC Gaming market in one hand is a bad thing.
Also this is a gamedev channel and Epic Games has been empowering game development for many years.
I just use the epic games store....
Did you not hear about the fab transfer off of unreal store?
If they make a native app and not web based they will succeed
No on is going to make an anti-woke engine?
Unigine is pretty much guaranteed to be anti-woke as it is Russian.
You're free to do so if you'd like. How would that even work, though? Say I want to make a game with a black soldier in it. Would the engine just...prevent me from doing so? Would it just delete the fbx file and rename my variables?
@@jmanners I like how u think
@@jmanners an engine that only allows Straight White Men to be the protagonist, forces all female characters to be large-breasted anorexic waifus, and a dialogue system that only allows stories about holocaust denial. and it would be powered by bitcoin XD
Bro a woke game isn’t woke because a black soldier is in it.
It would be woke if your game was based on history and you decided to change it to fit a narrative.
Example you make a game about Pearl Harbor and to be inclusive to modern events you decide to add a character in who is a gay trans Palestinian and is the best kamikaze pilot in history who also survived the crash and joined with Japan to fight against the US and wins the war. That is a woke game.
Why are you not covering the Godot dumpster fire the same way that you were covering the insanity with Unity and Adobe? You have always showed obvious favoritism for Godot, but now you are doing a message disservice to the community that you claim to serve impartially.
There isn’t much more to say about it. Dumpster still on fire isn’t news.
Pretty sure he already made a video about it.
because mike's channel is about making games, and the tools used for making games
the godot controversy doesnt matter to anyone who actually makes games. it only matters to 'anti-woke' culture warriors looking for a new manufactured outrage to jump onto.
there is absolutely nothing more that mike could cover about the controversy that would have any relevance to actual devs who consume his content.
if something changes with the state of the so-called dumpster fire, then i bet he'll cover it in a nuanced way, like he did the other day.
Probably because it's all drama and doesn't really affect anyone the way Adobe's TOS debacle did.
...I did cover it. Nothing of significance has happened since. Not exactly sure what you are wanting from me here? If you want this channel to drama farm and focus on culture war topics, that isn't going to ever happen.
i will only use the engine if they remove the cringe pronouns faction
not only is this unnecessary
but dumb and a complete waist of the program part .
like its bad enough we must code in some games
but in the game engine itself its taking way too far in my book .
and i am not politically interested i just want to make dumb cash grab games damn it
Oh, white boy problems. Words.
If you don't like them in your games, don't use them.
what the hell are you even talking about? there is no "pronouns faction". But if by any chance you're talking about the coding standards, well they're just recommendations that you don't have to follow, and also they're only for Epic employees working on the engine itself, not the developers making their games with it
@@randomcommenter10_ awwwww
awwwwwwwwww
well Gussie i fell for the right wing grifter trap of taking context out of context to push there agenda .
in that case i might check it out .
if this doesn't apply for the engine itself
and the rules only apple for the epic
then its fine by me
@@randomcommenter10_
I’m against those coding guidelines but look at the way this guy writes… he was clearly never gonna code, let alone release anything anyway.
1:02 that is not how it works. If you make 2M dollars you pay 50 or 35k. Everything up to 1M you pay nothing.
"You get the first million dollars in revenue free...,"
You quoted it but didnt hear him say it.