Inside The Tanks: The Sturmtiger - World of Tanks

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ม.ค. 2015
  • With the final episode of the Inside the Tanks filmed at The Deutsches Panzermuseum - Munster, we bring you an armoured monstrosity - The Sturmtiger!
    The Sturmtiger was a World War II German assault gun built on the Tiger I chassis and armed with a large calibre mortar. It was designed to provide heavy fire support for infantry units fighting in urban areas.
    Visit our forums and talk about your favourite tanks with our Military Specialist:
    forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.ph...
    The Challenger on Facebook: / wgchallenger
    To keep up to date with our latest development, contests and events visit our portal or follow us on Facebook:
    worldoftanks.eu/
    Facebook: / worldoftanks
    Twitter:
    / wargaming_neten
    / wargaming_netfr
    / wargaming_netde
    / wargaming_netpl
    / wargaming_netcz
    / wargaming_netes
    / wargaming_nettr
  • เกม

ความคิดเห็น • 2K

  • @johnwulffe
    @johnwulffe 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4989

    Funniest thing about this is that you can use that gun as an emergency exit.

    • @WargamingEurope
      @WargamingEurope  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1593

      +High-End Benchmarks We tried fitting in some of our team inside of it. Worked well.

    • @dr_hellcat_6664
      @dr_hellcat_6664 8 ปีที่แล้ว +145

      LOL

    • @SgtJohnRemairez
      @SgtJohnRemairez 8 ปีที่แล้ว +310

      +High-End Benchmarks wouldn't wanna escape through there after it fired...would burn my bollocks off...

    • @1madcanuck
      @1madcanuck 8 ปีที่แล้ว +176

      +High-End Benchmarks or (with a small charge) an ejection port for unwanted crew

    • @ristomladich246
      @ristomladich246 8 ปีที่แล้ว +67

      +High-End Benchmarks yeah sure, it also is a good oven after firing...

  • @louzenger6692
    @louzenger6692 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2309

    Imagine this thing exploding with 13 shells inside. Holy shiet

    • @halolime117
      @halolime117 9 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      xD

    • @embersaffron5522
      @embersaffron5522 9 ปีที่แล้ว +121

      As they are also rocketrs... ...FOR SCIENCE!

    • @nasrath42
      @nasrath42 9 ปีที่แล้ว +116

      well, it will be first (part of ) man on moon :)

    • @shovalhorovitz3658
      @shovalhorovitz3658 9 ปีที่แล้ว +64

      you wont feel a thing

    • @embersaffron5522
      @embersaffron5522 9 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      ***** WELCOME TO THE MOO...Oh...he's dead...

  • @saucydip2466
    @saucydip2466 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1679

    You do not call artillery with this tank
    You are the artillery

    • @raiben4437
      @raiben4437 6 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Mhg hunter Actually It's kind of both since it was used to destroy Heavily Fortified Bunkers and Could also destroy Tanks but that was not recommended as the reloading time was very long and the crew had to get out of the tank to use the crane the enemy tank could Spray them down with the Enemy tanks MG

    • @avsbes98
      @avsbes98 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Mhg hunter 4000-6000 metres is short distance ?

    • @jackofshadows8538
      @jackofshadows8538 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      When it creates a cloud about 200m high and 300m around it when it fires...
      YES!
      And it was bloody slow, prone to breakdowns and if an enemy tank got within 3km then it was fkd.

    • @mango_tgo8361
      @mango_tgo8361 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Harry D it’s a tank, a spg tank

    • @sol2544
      @sol2544 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@jackofshadows8538 Its gun had a range of 6km!

  • @masterchief3726
    @masterchief3726 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    They did it. They actually did it. They added the Sturmtiger to the game after 7 years of originally covering it.

    • @Idkwhattoput151
      @Idkwhattoput151 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      This is world of tanks

    • @CloneBricksz
      @CloneBricksz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Idkwhattoput151WOT console

  • @RibbonInsignia
    @RibbonInsignia 9 ปีที่แล้ว +534

    Don't worry kids the the Sturmtiger will be in World Of Warships where it belongs.

    • @Drache191200
      @Drache191200 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      RibbonInsignia 😂😂😂😂😂

    • @thedarkartist3635
      @thedarkartist3635 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      *fires round* *decimates warship* perfect

    • @Imashork
      @Imashork 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      It will be a tier 10 battleship along with the tog2:)

    • @_shivesh_12
      @_shivesh_12 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Damn right

    • @_shivesh_12
      @_shivesh_12 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Damn right

  • @joeclone345
    @joeclone345 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1051

    Could u just imagine this thing rolling up to your trench and looking down at you

    • @WargamingEurope
      @WargamingEurope  9 ปีที่แล้ว +304

      Lol, nope

    • @toecranky
      @toecranky 9 ปีที่แล้ว +104

      I couldn't either mostly due to the fact that trench warfare was mainly used in the First World War and not the second. Also the sturmtiger was used at long distances and would usually fire in indirect arches at it's target. Finally the gun depression was not good at all so it could not be able to point it's gun down into a trench.

    • @thegeneralissimo470
      @thegeneralissimo470 9 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Wargaming Europe Bet you guys had a lot of fun filming this series!

    • @xxbenjiboyxx2215
      @xxbenjiboyxx2215 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yea O.O

    • @zauppi
      @zauppi 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      eleventyfour WoT the Sturmtiger was a close range vehicle firing a rocket of the front.

  • @maximilienrobespierre7927
    @maximilienrobespierre7927 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1208

    I like how the channel is called Wargaming EUROPE but he uses feet instead of meters.

    • @gk10002000
      @gk10002000 7 ปีที่แล้ว +71

      Brits typically use feet, and miles also.

    • @maximilienrobespierre7927
      @maximilienrobespierre7927 7 ปีที่แล้ว +82

      But all the Europeans don't.

    • @WargamingEurope
      @WargamingEurope  7 ปีที่แล้ว +280

      But I am a Brit, long live feet !!!

    • @maximilienrobespierre7927
      @maximilienrobespierre7927 7 ปีที่แล้ว +102

      Bud I am using metric. And so does the overwhelming majority of the world.

    • @alphadelta2954
      @alphadelta2954 7 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Lol, was converting from feet to metres too difficult for your simple mind?

  • @alexanderchenf1
    @alexanderchenf1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    I have been saying this for years: diameter is more important than length!

  • @chems
    @chems 9 ปีที่แล้ว +442

    Rate Of Fire: 0.48 (125 seconds)
    Accuracy: 1.65 (T92 = 0.92)
    Aim time: 17.2 Seconds
    Penetration: 370mm
    Damage: 3440
    Splash radius: 12.7m

    • @Bynk333
      @Bynk333 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Its rocket shells man that thing dont need aiming time, they can aim while flight. :-)

    • @nickyxd6596
      @nickyxd6596 4 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      @@Bynk333 it unguided

    • @trainboi014
      @trainboi014 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nickyxd6596 l u l

    • @ronkennethbalitao1337
      @ronkennethbalitao1337 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Bynk333 but the rocket weight

    • @dutchvanderlinde2636
      @dutchvanderlinde2636 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@Bynk333 yeah a rocket. A rocket is unguided but a missile is guided

  • @JackSteadlan
    @JackSteadlan 7 ปีที่แล้ว +300

    6:31 Is that sexual assault?

    • @rotgutthebloated4730
      @rotgutthebloated4730 7 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      No, its Hugh Mungus!

    • @Rubashow
      @Rubashow 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      He was actually pointing at this!

    • @IIAndersII
      @IIAndersII 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hugh Mungus what?!
      HUGH MUNGUS WHAT?!?!
      SEXUAL ASSAULT!

    • @lutin_mi06
      @lutin_mi06 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      FBI,OPEN UP!!!!

    • @sergiomissaglia6380
      @sergiomissaglia6380 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      How dare you !

  • @dirt0133
    @dirt0133 3 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    Very interesting. I only wish he'd gone into detail concerning how they got that enormous shell (Rocket) into the breech.

  • @cutterbacon
    @cutterbacon 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1096

    War thunder.................Direct hit on a t34....................non-penetration.

    • @quadgod8111
      @quadgod8111 8 ปีที่แล้ว +77

      all about angles

    • @danmetrou
      @danmetrou 8 ปีที่แล้ว +104

      +cutterbacon Russian plated armor it deflects even the bombs from the planes.

    • @gaborcoolmc7903
      @gaborcoolmc7903 8 ปีที่แล้ว +155

      Russian bias xD
      In war Thunder, I dropped a 5000kg bomb with a Pe8 (russian heavy bomber) directly on a t34 and it bounced it off into the water..
      Fuck logic xD

    • @cutterbacon
      @cutterbacon 8 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Its confirmed the t34 is a good tank lol.

    • @X3riv3X
      @X3riv3X 8 ปีที่แล้ว +83

      Except the T-34 is not a good tank IRL. It was "decent" enough, and that is putting it lightly

  • @kauilaacasio8432
    @kauilaacasio8432 5 ปีที่แล้ว +99

    Looking back at it and playing games like BFV, the Germans really made some great and terrifying weaponry. The people they had in there developing their tools were definitely thinking ahead of their time

    • @noturkill9879
      @noturkill9879 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If Germany had more equipment and supplies they probably would of been a more formidable for(not that they weren't one already). But the allies had America and canada and their armies and resources which were larger than those of Germany's. So tigers and panzers were more powerful or deadly tanks. But there were more Russian tanks and Sherman's than there were any of the former. And when Germany lost control of the air they lost the war.

  • @cybermollusk
    @cybermollusk 7 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    "...a Sturmtiger taking out three M4 Shermans." Probably at the same time haha.

    • @kennethreese2193
      @kennethreese2193 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      With a 761 pound HE round that thing could take out 3 Abrams at the same time if they weren't dispersed,

    • @thethirdman225
      @thethirdman225 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Did you guys not pay attention? This was not intended for use against tanks. It was mobile siege artillery.

    • @Omen_Seven
      @Omen_Seven 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Honestly, I'm not so sure; the protection that modern MBT's have borders on stupid. Modern tanks are actually at a point right now where one nation's tank can't take out another frontally because of how effective the armor is.
      Here's some numbers for perspective and to help illustrate what I'm talking about: the smooth bore, Rheinmetall based 120 mm on an Abrams is said to have "about" 600 mm of penetration against rolled homogeneous steel armor (the steel tanks used to be made out of), while the front of an Abrams is estimated to have the equivalent of 800-1300 mm of RHS armor.
      All that being said, that is against physical impacts, and I don't know how the ceramic, composites, air pockets and all the other crap that makes up its armor would stand up to explosives.

    • @thethirdman225
      @thethirdman225 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Aaron Turner The natural enemy of modern MBTs is not other tanks. It's aircraft and missiles. Frontal armour is largely irrelevant if you can disable the tank with a shaped charge, detonated over the engine compartment.

    • @Omen_Seven
      @Omen_Seven 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      TheThirdMan True, but that's not really what the topic was. It would be interesting to see what would happen if this monstrosity fired an HE round that detonated near an Abrams. I say near it, because even with how well protected an Abrams is, a 380 mm HE shell exploding on the tank would most likely still cause some significant damage.

  • @randomwatermelon1
    @randomwatermelon1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +88

    "7 ton heavier than tiger 1"
    Tiger transmission: *incohearent screaming*

    • @trainboi014
      @trainboi014 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rip

    • @scorchclasstitan6727
      @scorchclasstitan6727 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      RandomWatermelon1 an artillery piece doesn’t really need to move very much .

  • @markusdupree5317
    @markusdupree5317 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    When War thunder updates also update your TH-cam recommendations

  • @elnewbie2611
    @elnewbie2611 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Here after warthunder added it lol

  • @matthewspence7476
    @matthewspence7476 9 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    The gunners alternative gunner hatch is through the gun 😆

    • @keithparkinson6170
      @keithparkinson6170 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      At 38cm(15") he have to reasonably thin.

  • @thatwolffe3802
    @thatwolffe3802 9 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    you can fire babies out of that thing

    • @SunnySikdar
      @SunnySikdar 9 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      ThatWolffe lol.... not only babies it can fire adults too from its gun.

  • @joshdudeguy2830
    @joshdudeguy2830 8 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    I think it's funny that this beast can carry 14 rounds but in WoT, the Sturer Emil can only carry 12. lol

    • @Tj1056
      @Tj1056 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      because its such a large tank. It has the actual room to fit it, the Emil is much smaller in size to fit the same amount of ammo

    • @pandaspurp6334
      @pandaspurp6334 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Tj1056 Lol I'm always running out of ammo in the Emil, I got 3 marks and a 98% standing but I always goof some important shot and can't get that last 2 percent

    • @aidenmacdonald6677
      @aidenmacdonald6677 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pandas Purp with the emil you don't really kill them you more damage them a lot other wise you just waste ammo

    • @no00ob
      @no00ob 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Joshua Reyes lol

    • @unnecessaryammorack
      @unnecessaryammorack 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Joshua Reyes the St Emil carries 15 (or is that only in blitz)

  • @SpudsMcHaggis
    @SpudsMcHaggis 9 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Another fine and informative video Richard.
    A massive thank you for showing this rare beast!

  • @laylalua5722
    @laylalua5722 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    War Thunder laughing in the back already having that tank ingame.

  • @idsfxtm5759
    @idsfxtm5759 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Wargaming : Using Feet
    European except British : *We dont do that here*

  • @mercinary110
    @mercinary110 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    So glad I got to go to that Museum when I was stationed in Germany. Seeing all the Tigers and all was a real treat

  • @Gryglicki_za_oknem
    @Gryglicki_za_oknem ปีที่แล้ว +5

    World of tanks devs after seeing comments saying "warthunder better" 🎧💀

  • @bertiemilner
    @bertiemilner ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Who's here after the War Thuder Update

  • @alecmcd552
    @alecmcd552 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I wish I could buy a DVD with all these episodes on it, my grandpa would love this stuff but you don't see him getting on TH-cam...lol.

  • @benjaminsande8711
    @benjaminsande8711 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    this video is only relevant again because Warthunder added the SturmTiger

  • @Technologeek92
    @Technologeek92 8 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    Hey Fritz
    Yes Klaus
    You know what would be cool?
    What?
    A tank that fires 2 stage rockets.
    Sure why not.
    Germans, what will they think of next.

  • @TexWiller92
    @TexWiller92 9 ปีที่แล้ว +473

    We want it on Wot!!!!

    • @Askorti
      @Askorti 9 ปีที่แล้ว +109

      No, you do NOT want it, believe me.

    • @metkic94
      @metkic94 9 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      This tank is in coh 2

    • @simonba0462
      @simonba0462 9 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      I want it but not as arty maybe a tier10 TD

    • @BlackBunik
      @BlackBunik 9 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      It would be ultra derp :D

    • @redheadsg1
      @redheadsg1 9 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      I would be happy at least with Brummbär.

  • @yevrahhipstar3902
    @yevrahhipstar3902 8 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    Those shermans would've been a mess.......

    • @Exodon2020
      @Exodon2020 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      +Yevrah Hipstar Want to see the penetration hole on one of them. Holy crap. If anyone survived the impact he didn't have to use the hatch to climb out ;-)

    • @CoIdHeat
      @CoIdHeat 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +VgDestroyer493 He wasn't adressing the numbers obviously but how these shermans must have looked after a hit

    • @Enzo012
      @Enzo012 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They won't really have looked like anything there would just be some charred fragments of metal scattered across a wide area.

    • @Huwberts_Emporium
      @Huwberts_Emporium 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Unless they could put a round through the barrel of that thing

    • @mrfuzzerkins4170
      @mrfuzzerkins4170 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      what shermans? all i see is a hole in the ground

  • @Cristian-su7yz
    @Cristian-su7yz 8 ปีที่แล้ว +667

    Russians found the this tank*
    Russian: Are you thinking what I'm thinking
    Russian2: Oh yeah....
    *Driving the Sturmtiger shooting nukes*
    Russian: I love my job

    • @WargamingEurope
      @WargamingEurope  8 ปีที่แล้ว +135

      +Cristian Great idea for a premium tank. Thanks!

    • @traroberts1705
      @traroberts1705 8 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      +Wargaming Europe wargaming plz

    • @neurofiedyamato8763
      @neurofiedyamato8763 8 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      +Tra Roberts Let me finish that sentence for you,"wargaming plz, add it"

    • @veme2857
      @veme2857 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +Neurofied Yamato XD

    • @slap_my_hand
      @slap_my_hand 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      being russain is a job? :D

  • @fishbmw
    @fishbmw 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for a facinating insight into this impressive looking vehicle.👍
    Although I can't help but find it slightly disappointing that the procedure for moving the massive rounds from the rack into the breech wasn't covered whilst you had access to the interior of the vehicle.

  • @Leka5oo
    @Leka5oo 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Big respect Richard ! Can't wait for the next one :)

  • @tracyerik
    @tracyerik 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I love these videos. Lots of information. A very good presenter.

  • @sharpy_666
    @sharpy_666 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good vid it’s so fun to heat about one of your favorite tanks

  • @breemy2242
    @breemy2242 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Any other warthunder players got this recomended

  • @UnhingedRage
    @UnhingedRage 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I know you guys have tried to implement the sturmtiger into World of Tanks in the past but failed to due to the struggle in balancing its power but would you guys ever reconsider trying again one day with the help of the World of Tanks community?
    Or if you could consider events based purely around that tank even if it's restricted to that game mode

    • @masterbowler6454
      @masterbowler6454 ปีที่แล้ว

      This tank is present in Company of Heros 2 (a ww2 strategy game), and it got nerfed so hard that now it has like 5 meters range lol

    • @Luftwaffles1
      @Luftwaffles1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wat thunder has it so I guess you could try that

  • @petepan9696
    @petepan9696 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome video. Thanks.

  • @tomatoes3
    @tomatoes3 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for a concise video.

  • @KingPeaceus
    @KingPeaceus 9 ปีที่แล้ว +199

    I can't wait to Ammo Rack this tank in WarThunder

  • @Shiraumere
    @Shiraumere 9 ปีที่แล้ว +114

    Wouldn't have a problem seeing this as a ultra-derp TD with no camo , no accuracy and the reload time of an arty.

    • @martv3868
      @martv3868 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      wood be awesome

    • @vavra222
      @vavra222 9 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      ***** It would delete the cap circle...

    • @Autechltd
      @Autechltd 9 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      vavra222
      New Game Mode: Kill the enemy's sturmtiger before it nukes the map.
      Game Time: 15 minutes

    • @JaHeSt
      @JaHeSt 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Is there not one standing on the map Severogorsk in one of those Garages

    • @TheTripleAce3
      @TheTripleAce3 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Heinrich Dethahal New game mode: Run.
      Game Time: how fast can you hit the Esc key.

  • @MGB-learning
    @MGB-learning ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video!

  • @Nik.42
    @Nik.42 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The cannon is that much big that a small pearson could fit in

  • @MadTad
    @MadTad 8 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    Did you just say 6000 to 8000 meters? Well it's definetly a bit smaller in CoH2. ^^ (20 m lol).

    • @MadTad
      @MadTad 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      With Wildhide In the most cases. I've seen how a katjuscha was NOT destroyed by a direct hit. ^^

    • @kennethreese2193
      @kennethreese2193 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      with a 380mm 700+ pound HEAT round that thing could one shot a battleship turret. That beast could likely pop the top off a modern MBT with a miss.

    • @darthbrayl8693
      @darthbrayl8693 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      lol

    • @thethirdman225
      @thethirdman225 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wasn't meant for use against tanks. It was mobile siege artillery.

    • @MadTad
      @MadTad 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      TheThirdMan That didn't really matter though, right? I mean.. you can use it against almost everything.^^

  • @literallyDH
    @literallyDH 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is just getting recommended now

  • @daveatlarge5030
    @daveatlarge5030 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I really enjoy your channel!

  • @lucasrc3140
    @lucasrc3140 9 ปีที่แล้ว +241

    If they added it to wot it would be the new king of derp, bye kv-2

    • @gitagrasa2269
      @gitagrasa2269 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lucas Alex they will add it

    • @elitecassidy8258
      @elitecassidy8258 9 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      I bet it'll appear in war thunder first, considering how the world of tanks engine can't render graphics like that much smoke for a rocket without failing

    • @Renousim
      @Renousim 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gita Nasteviča Chances are they wont for balance issues, the thing already had a lot of armor and that shell would one shot any tank regardless of tier

    • @johnkats14
      @johnkats14 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Renousim the accuracy though.. its even shorter than the C GC, also being a rocket not a shell

    • @leopold7148
      @leopold7148 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Renousim they will make mechanical failures to balance it lol

  • @prohunter5433
    @prohunter5433 9 ปีที่แล้ว +142

    gets added to warthunder, gets br 4. russians get it as a premium "captured" tank for br 3.

    • @akid1263
      @akid1263 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      gay

    • @xXMegaUltraNinjaXx
      @xXMegaUltraNinjaXx 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      +prohunter543 ... should be added to german tech tree...

    • @ollie9790
      @ollie9790 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +Keegan “xXxMUNxXx” Oliver wow.... you really didn't get the joke did you -_-

    • @xXMegaUltraNinjaXx
      @xXMegaUltraNinjaXx 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Oliver Cave NOPE, because soviets have technology that is at least 69 years ahead of current technology.

    • @ollie9790
      @ollie9790 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Keegan Oliver No, you didn't get the joke...

  • @braith117
    @braith117 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Those things are pretty damn impressive in person, especially the Tiger II next to it.

  • @tomatoes3
    @tomatoes3 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this video,very helpful. 👌

  • @idunnomane
    @idunnomane 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    They should add a "special tech tree" with unique tanks like this sturmtiger and more noice tanks!

  • @thekev506
    @thekev506 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Director: were doing a video about a very rare and unusual tank in-person, better make sure all of the shots are close ups of the presenter and not do any shots where you can see lots of the tank

  • @unaidedpizza2650
    @unaidedpizza2650 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So this is what Wargaming is hinting at in their feature testing video

  • @yamabushi170
    @yamabushi170 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I never realised Barry Chuckle was so knowledgeable about late era WWII German heavy assault armour

  • @Blueatchley12
    @Blueatchley12 9 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Imagine being inside a Sherman and getting hit by that thing, rest in pieces

    • @vmx189
      @vmx189 9 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Thunder Atchley If you were inside a sherman tank and took a direct hit from that gun no one would know you existed at all.

    • @tutel19
      @tutel19 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      More like rest in nothing bc that explosion would leave nothing afterwards

    • @dwiwahyu7638
      @dwiwahyu7638 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      PAK-40 enough to make sherman crew sweating

    • @scorchclasstitan6727
      @scorchclasstitan6727 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hakatus “Hans where did that enemy tank go?”
      *shrugs while looking at a pile of ash*

  • @rony_ftw
    @rony_ftw 8 ปีที่แล้ว +105

    how did they reload this thing if one round has 300 kg

    • @CarrierHasArrived
      @CarrierHasArrived 8 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      +Miron Klescik Crane inside crew compartment.

    • @boxadmiral
      @boxadmiral 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +HaveBKYourWay That is a really funny thought

    • @EricTanGH0ST
      @EricTanGH0ST 8 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      I can confirm this, because I was just playing COH2, after firing a rocket, it takes forever to reload !
      There's two crew member reloading the gun with a crane built on top of the tank = ="""

    • @BADASSDaniDusk
      @BADASSDaniDusk 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      There were germans

    • @StryderK
      @StryderK 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Building the RFM Sturmtiger with interior. It has mobile pully to the rear. This can swing from left to right and two hooks up front. To load a shell, chains and cables would be attached to the rear pully. This would be swung to either left or right to grab a shell by the rear and swing it first onto the loading tray. The front is held by the two hooks near the breech. Once the rear is onto the tray, the front is then slowly winch to place. Afterwards, the chains and cables are put away, a huge hand crank would be attached to the rear to literally crank the shell into the breech.

  • @TheFunkhouser
    @TheFunkhouser 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Churchill AVRE (Armoured Vehicle Royal Engineer) was a modified Churchill tank fitted with a Petard spigot mortar. Was done.

  • @americanpatriot2422
    @americanpatriot2422 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video

  • @CrniWuk
    @CrniWuk 9 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I wish they would not always repeat this same myth over and over again that the Tiger 1 was an unreliable machine ... even many historians continue to parrot this lines that someone somewhere decided. According to direct battle and repair reports the Tiger 1 was actually a formidable tank in the field. However it WAS a heavy tank without a doubt! And thus it came with the deficiencies that have been TYPICAL for a heavy tank - pretty much ALL of them had those in WW2. With correct crew training and proper maintenance the Tiger 1 was a very reliable machine in the field.

    • @CrniWuk
      @CrniWuk 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Depends about which designs and tanks we are talking about. The panzer IV and III? They have been relatively well designed. The Panther though? Was rushed in to combat, and thus suffered a lot from unreliable mechanics. Anyway, in those cases where the Germans could keep up basic maintance their tanks have proven to be usually very reliable machines. Even the Tiger 1 and Tiger 2. That's all I am saying. Of course in 1945 it becames all simply to difficult for the Germans. It was the end of the war after all.

    • @SoldatenTroopen
      @SoldatenTroopen 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +CrniWuk I think it's more of that by the end of the war, strategic bombing was actually showing results in the staggering losses in production for the German war-machine in that fuel, munitions, and spare components combined with lack of trained crew all led to the inevitable breakdown of most of their machines. Compared to all the other nations fighting, the Germans were more prone to having unreliable vehicles because they were using either hastily produced machines or ones that had been refitted too many times that they eventually broke down.
      Look at the Ardennes offensive, the only reason why the Germans halted was because they ran out of fuel and ammunition for their vehicles and ended up scuttling most of their vehicles or they simply broke down in the cold weather and mud and were abandoned as the Wehrmacht infantry support were forced back. When the Allies came in, they just assumed it was due to faulty machinery when in fact it was because the Germans could no longer support their heavy armour.
      Primarily, the main issue goes to their fighting doctrine. They relied too heavily on Blitzkrieg tactics and always being able to capture the resources they needed that when the tide was turned, their infrastructure for the military couldn't bounce back.
      There are however a very small percentage of vehicles that were sabotaged from PoW and concentration camp labor but those numbers are unreliable and much smaller to what actually was the more common source: self destruction as the Wehrmacht retreated.

    • @CrniWuk
      @CrniWuk 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Commissar Gaunt
      Well as much issues as the Germans had, but you have to take a look at the other nations and their tanks as well. Take the Pershing or KV1 as example or the early version of the T34-76. Those havn't been exactly the most reliable tanks either. All nations had issues with transport, reliablity and the economy. Sometimes more, sometimes less. Even the US, since they had not only to manufacture everything but also send it like several thousand miles over the atlantic ocean.
      I would say you can not make a general argument either about the Germans or the Allied tanks. You have to look at the machines and battles they where thrown in. The Panther has proven to be a very unreliable machine in the battle of Kurks with almost all of the Panthers lost due to mechanical failures. Yet the Panther later provd to be a very good tank once most of the flaws have been worked out. Tanks like the Tiger and Panzer IV, that is shown by the battle reports and the experience of the Soldiers have been for their time and use reliable machines.
      Of course at the time of 1944 and 45 it was nigh to impossible to keep up the warmachine. So much is correct. But even in situations like the Ardenes tanks like the Tiger 2 and Panther performed reasonably well. Much better than their reputation would suggest. Of course you have also those situations where a column of Shermans took out a Tiger 2 by causing a damage to it's electical firing mechanism and the crew had to abandon their tank.

    • @zelanoid7334
      @zelanoid7334 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +CrniWuk the tiger was only reliable in its retreating defensive role. Damned tank was too heavy, and an engine that consumed to much fuel making it not a good tank at all in reality.

    • @CrniWuk
      @CrniWuk 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      zela noid
      The Tiger, was for 1942 and 43 a decent heavy tank. As Otto Carius describes in his book, what the German heavy tanks required the most, have been good drivers and experienced crews.
      tankarchives.blogspot.de/2014/08/carius-interview.html
      About the Tiger. How reliable was it?
      "Initially, there were growing pains. The first company with Tigers was used at Ladoga, near Volkhov. The terrain is nearly impassable for tanks, and it was winter. All Tigers broke down! This happens always, with every new technology.
      A significant factor in a Tiger's reliability was the training of the driver. An experienced driver can reduce technical issues. At first, thank god, I had experienced drivers. Then we had young drivers for Jagdtigers, and it was a catastrophe. My personal tank #217 had to be blown up at Danzig, and it held out until almost the end of the war."
      However, that doesn't mean that the allies have been completely defenseless when ever a Tiger or Tiger 2 started to pop up. Particularly once they spotted the enemy vehicle.

  • @FinALIEN93
    @FinALIEN93 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "Demolisher cannon loaded!" vindicator much :P from 40k :D

  • @scambroselauntrellus3681
    @scambroselauntrellus3681 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The fact that this thing can even carry a dozen shells is impressive. It doesn't look like they'd all fit.

  • @mecrac
    @mecrac 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    nice little video but my biggest question wasnt answered which was "how did they load those rounds into the gun inside the tank? and how much did the shells weigh?" just looking at them makes me curious

  • @xpression111
    @xpression111 9 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    if they add this in the game the stats of the gun will be
    rate of fire 0.30
    acurracy 0.150
    aim time 15 sec
    nice video thx wg eu.

    • @MrTheZerstorer
      @MrTheZerstorer 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      the best guns in game so far have around 0.30 accuracy (it's basically the spread of the gun)
      so 0.150 would be deadly accurate
      more like 1.5

    • @keksik989
      @keksik989 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Then the acc will be 1.50 lol also
      Pen with shells: 350 mm
      Dmg: 4500 hp
      Hp: 750
      Max speed: 25 km/h

    • @andgoodbye696
      @andgoodbye696 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sebastian Bugar 4500 hp damage, maus has 3000 hp...lol

    • @Skrabob
      @Skrabob 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      probably less than1 shot per minute (65-72sec)
      13 shells
      2500 damage
      55 pen (i know the pen is low, but if the pen is too high, it would be extremly OP)
      1.5 unbeliveable worse accuracy (but when it hits, it hurts bad)
      25m splash radius
      range is across complete map
      15sec aim time (well your enemy have to camp badly :D)
      420 HP
      25km/h
      even for an SPG, this is a RNG cannon
      and this as an Tier8 prem SPG

    • @MrTheZerstorer
      @MrTheZerstorer 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Skrabob 2500 damage? T92 can oneshot a maus
      it'd have to be 3500 damage with HE
      and AP with 180mm pen and 2500 damage

  • @t___m
    @t___m ปีที่แล้ว +3

    How ridiculous is it that this video is made by WG, yet Gajin added it to War Thunder sooner?

  • @danielcaballito4992
    @danielcaballito4992 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much for the video, and for the subtitle, just the English language is very clear

  • @SarntRexxo
    @SarntRexxo 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    These vids are the only thing i enjoy as far as wot goes

  • @kharnthebetrayero9036
    @kharnthebetrayero9036 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I want this tank as a German premiums tier 7 or 8

    • @KazagiriRaidon
      @KazagiriRaidon 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      kharn the betrayer O this would be a Tier 11 Tank

  • @Tentacl
    @Tentacl 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Reload time: 12 minutes.

  • @2ash.2
    @2ash.2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The little you need to know is that for reloading it takes 5 minutes but its worth it

  • @GamingChannel-bg1rz
    @GamingChannel-bg1rz 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice, I love World of Tanks :)

  • @GudrezBilly
    @GudrezBilly 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The Tiger I was actually pretty darn reliable. You just couldn't let the engine RPM go past... Was it 2000? Or 2200...?

  • @googlemyfist114
    @googlemyfist114 8 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    Great, now review the Karl! ( 600mm gun )

    • @Spitfirefan1397
      @Spitfirefan1397 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      have you seen the film?

    • @googlemyfist114
      @googlemyfist114 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Spitfirefan1397 Indeed I have, I shit my pants when I saw the Karl.

    • @dylankey_
      @dylankey_ 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      jesus christ GuP fans well *PANZER VOR*

    • @danialhakim1427
      @danialhakim1427 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +AnimeGamersYT there's a survivor, im pretty sure Karl is in Kubinka

    • @dylankey_
      @dylankey_ 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Danial Hakim did i say there wasnt one left

  • @muhamadabubkr2361
    @muhamadabubkr2361 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm a War thunder fan but these vids are too informative and interesting to miss. But i can't help but notice his eyes moving from right to left periodically and i'm sure he's reading from some sort of screen. Anyways thumbs up :)

  • @dantonhulet911
    @dantonhulet911 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I may not like World of Tanks but I do love this show!

  • @StyrbjornStarke
    @StyrbjornStarke 9 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Didnt think there where any of these left.

  • @marceoveja69
    @marceoveja69 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    War Thunder: ¡WRITE THAY DOWN!

  • @scudwerfer
    @scudwerfer 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    the Sturmtiger was my favorite Vehicle in SuddenStrike 2! It was awesome and deadly

  • @drstrangelove4998
    @drstrangelove4998 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great series. The presenter has a sound grasp of German pronunciation too 👍🏻

  • @Josef2820
    @Josef2820 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    2:43 die gute alte "Sturm Möse"

  • @EndersFPS
    @EndersFPS 5 ปีที่แล้ว +79

    BFV anyone?

  • @justincancelosa5773
    @justincancelosa5773 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I love how the radioman had to be the machine gunner, the callout guy, and the loader at the same time. Oh and don’t forget they all had to load the ammo into the tank together. That makes 4 jobs for one guy with a walkietalkie 😂.

  • @tenhendee5479
    @tenhendee5479 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Porsche turret on the Tiger 2: perfect design.

  • @anthonycoon6955
    @anthonycoon6955 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    They need to get this into war thunder man

    • @pablopons572
      @pablopons572 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is xd

    • @anthonycoon6955
      @anthonycoon6955 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pablopons572 it is now it wasn’t when I made this

    • @meepy2739
      @meepy2739 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@anthonycoon6955 lucky you

  • @theamericanfarmer6223
    @theamericanfarmer6223 8 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    put it in world of tanks

    • @WargamingEurope
      @WargamingEurope  8 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      +Kyle Swartfager We tried, gun could fit on the map!

    • @mrgoose2108
      @mrgoose2108 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      couldn't*

    • @RuggedCoyote69
      @RuggedCoyote69 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +I_hate_people_with_really_long_names_on_TH-cam *rckt

    • @mrgoose2108
      @mrgoose2108 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Arctrooper Rob k

    • @vapourrevive2307
      @vapourrevive2307 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Wargaming Europe u mean couldn't?

  • @blimlp891
    @blimlp891 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You: There is an enemy Tank!!! Run!
    Sturmtieger: "shoots"
    You: ...
    Sturmtieger: were?

  • @Nixonitus
    @Nixonitus 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looks like something out of Metal Slug. Pretty awesome

  • @christopherwendorf2008
    @christopherwendorf2008 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Was that the museum in Münster?

  • @fakepepe9424
    @fakepepe9424 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    WoT's new garage brought me here I WANT THE STURMTIGER IN WOT

  • @MyLateralThawts
    @MyLateralThawts 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonder what kind of combat team you would build around this? Would it consist of a platoon of 3, or a demolition team of 2? Would you have a full platoon of infantry to support and protect them, or a full company? Would you have regular tanks such as the PZKW IV tasked to support them as well? I'm guessing the employment of the Brumbar in Stalingrad might give us some idea.

  • @CIoudStriker
    @CIoudStriker 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Such an absurd vehicle. I love it to bits.

  • @BeetleatWar
    @BeetleatWar 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Hope my sources are right:
    In January 1945, a single round from a PzStuMrKp 1001 Sturmtiger reportedly destroyed three American M-4 Sherman tanks located in a targeted village.
    One Shot - 3(!) Kills...........

    • @WargamingEurope
      @WargamingEurope  9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      As I said in vid though totally unconfirmed report.

    • @Slycarlo
      @Slycarlo 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Wargaming Europe
      just like russian claiming a 122mm of the IS variant can pen a tiger 2 frontal armor

    • @Alte.Kameraden
      @Alte.Kameraden 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Carl Miester Doesn't even do it on World of Tanks unless you use the good ammunition. lol

    • @Fallout3ProHunter
      @Fallout3ProHunter 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      1 shot 3 kills? Allahu Akbar?

    • @ADirtyScrub
      @ADirtyScrub 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      BeetleatWar High explosive? I mean, this is like a really early Javelin, with the two stage propellant so a 380mm HE shell coming down would cause quite a mess.

  • @buschpilot9017
    @buschpilot9017 9 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    So..russians got a KV2 ingame... when is this one coming?!

    • @vilxux9752
      @vilxux9752 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It actually was on a event

  • @DaUsher
    @DaUsher 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The closest thing to a real-world Demolisher Cannon.

  • @officialhogryda4027
    @officialhogryda4027 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Everyone that plays battlefield 5 knows how much of a beast this thing is

  • @s.shadow8094
    @s.shadow8094 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    6:31 amogus? Lol jk

  • @TheSunkenSwede
    @TheSunkenSwede 9 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Great arty, too bad the narrator makes it feel a little uninterresting when he is just reading facts from a screen/sheet next to the camera :/

    • @deadpan237
      @deadpan237 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      lol I didn't even notice, guess I was too busy looking at the armored monstrosity behind him to care where his eyes were looking

    • @Zipcot
      @Zipcot 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Sunken Swede It's not a artillery. It's a Heavy assault gun

    • @TheSunkenSwede
      @TheSunkenSwede 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Zipcot but if they add it to WoT i think it will be an arty :P

  • @giloncho7609
    @giloncho7609 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    0:53 "where the hole idea came from..." good one

  • @striv5546
    @striv5546 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Using that kind of gun on a M4 Sherman is overkill to the max

  • @hurricaneman7777
    @hurricaneman7777 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Who's watching this in 2016

    • @Trillock-hy1cf
      @Trillock-hy1cf 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Today in 2017 mate....:)

    • @KazagiriRaidon
      @KazagiriRaidon 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Roman Soldier actually in 2021 lol #Timetravel