Being a student of Jordan Peterson and Just listening to How Jordan Peterson talks and thinks it's clear he does not have a photographic memory which makes him even more extraordinary
He has interesting things to say at times, but if strays into other fields that are not his areas of expertise all the time. If you look at what experts in those fields have to say about his claims in those areas, they’re frequently wrong. He’s really not all he’s cracked out to be
Jordan Peterson just made me appreciate my own brain. What he described and physically acted out is how my own brain organizes things but I have so often tried to make it work differently. I also appreciate how he didn’t let the other guy tell him how his own brain worked; he stuck with what he knew about himself to be true.
I could tell this is how JBP thinks. I've developed the same way with programming. Everything self directed and incorporated into a a sort of working model. Each new piece of info is either plugged in to expand the model, or the model adapts. Once you have this model, you can easily pull from it to answer questions, or just talk for hours as you explore different sections.
Does this process transcend professions and academics? Say if you have such a system for approaching a profession, that in itself is a micro compartment in a larger approach to life that also runs similarly.
@@ElvisismI reason to believe so. The model encapsulates all knowledge learned almost like a 3D puzzle. I want to know what lectures he’s referring to.
Yes, I perceive and process basically the same as JP. I always refer to my unifying theory as he sort of states it, as my jigsaw puzzle. All experience, all information, I receive, I search for then reorganize and place the pieces to form the picture of all things together. There's always a place for everything, and nothing is left out. And I look at all layers of a thing, and try to understand their essence, and the fabric of all.
I see patterns in the pieces, and how every piece fits together, or at least that's the goal. It's a constant process, and my mind is often lost to the effort, and enjoyment of the process. It's both straining, and highly enjoyable at times. I often know and understand things before others, and in deeper and further reaching ways. I often am able to solve problems that others aren't even aware of, or if they are, in ways they do not consider. I see answers that can only be seen, if you can see the grand picture. I also recognize that my strength and ability therein, is both a gift, and curse, and that all forms of intelligence, and ability, have their important places, and roles. I see myself as a speaker, a philosopher, an artist, an advisor, a problem solver, an innovator, a consultant, a visionary, etcetera. I am one whose greatest work is on ideas and concepts, so from the outside it may seem that I do little work at all, but it hardly stops internally.
@@Frejborg You have a massively over inflated ego, as well as delusions of grandeur. Seek therapy, I recommend cognitive behavioral therapy so you can learn the causes of your ego mania
He relates to life.. this is the best way to teach children.. they ask why tell tell them .. explain everything they want and let them figure out the rest on their own .. that’s how you end up with quick thinking.. you have to think for yourself. And be able to ask questions and decide the answer and outcome for yourself By making connections to your life and experiences. Then the information is easier to understand and decipher. This man is brilliant!
Best ways to organize the thoughts based on shared theory... every thing revolves around fundamental, once connect the subjects with fundamental concept that evolved and build and organize them...
Just a tidbit of information the "interviewer" is Patrick bet David and if you go to the full video you won't find anyone who says that he cuts Jordan off and asks him a million times about this. Because in the greater context of the conversation makes it obvious that it's not the case and this video cut out about 30% of this specific part of the conversation making it seem like he is cutting him off and being very persistent but due to the cuts and what seems to be a slight speed up i can see how it would give you that idea
Peterson is able to compartmentalize with precision. A natural librarian. He sorts and categorizes, using subject to pigeonhole. In a sense, his thinking is like chain lightning, tying topics and references together into different pathways with each addition supporting the other in any argument or lessons, going places that few think to go. I don’t always like him or agree with him, but he’s brilliant, and that’s enough.
When we listen to people like this, with this much knowledge and such a good vocabulary, we instantly admire and want to be more like them than athletes, actors or singers 😂
Shit, my eyes widened a little when he said that, I realize I think the exact same way. General concepts that are compartmentalized into the supporting evidences that build up the concept. I found it was easier to hold a concept or view longer by doing this. Eventually, some piece of evidence (or even many pieces) come in that topple the entire things structure, and I have to build it up as a new thing, but this happens less and less as I keep adding more structured concepts. I guess it's how I am able to keep stability in my psyche, in a way.
Oooh. That might be it. I have a big picture mentality and people can marvel at what I remember. I call it a filing cabinet but I like Dr. P’s explanation. It fits the picture so I remember it almost pre cognitively.
When complex emotions are involved, you have to organize knowledge in a complex way. Logic is just the start. Much more difficult and critical unbiased judgement is required
The funny thing here is WHY Jordan so vehemently said NO about how he organises himself when asked if he had a photographic memory, is that he knows that the interviewer in this video would attack anywhere he could see a potential political edge or leaning toward one side or another, probably because the interviewer wouldn't just shut up and ask the questions, kept interrupting and introducing new obstacles to any answer
That is the secret to intelligence. Its not knowing things, its not being great at math or chess. Its the ability to more quickly combine data into correct conclusions, to combine things others would not have thought of to create something new or better.
Same as myself, well conceived unified theories efficiently integrate new information and are transformed when the axioms need to be shifted, otherwise, the axioms dictate how everything fits together.
I actually had Jordan Peterson as a professor in Canada, in the 90s. He tried to teach us about Post Modernism. I and many others were also taking film 101. Petersons descriptions were so confusing that when we studied post modern film, the film prof has to schedule extra weekend lectures to un teach the garbage peterson taught and reteach the correct concepts of post modernism. The university had to discipline peterson for teaching garbage.
@@johnnygoodman2003 His reachings about PM (which is a relatively minor topic compared to his primary specialization) might have been limited, as John V., I think, communicated to him (which may have led to changes), but overall it sounds like he was well rated as a lecturer. His available lectures appear to be more interesting and relevant than most of the psyc courses I can recall. In any case, academics scarcely agree with one another when they're devoted to specific frames of reference.
@@pneumaE that's just it. He teaches clinical psychology. He's was not supposed to dedicate 3 lectures to post modernism philosophy. But that year, that's what he did. He filled his lecture time with culture war garbage instead of the actual content on the curriculum.
I would love to hear this "Theory" of Mr. Peterson 's Edit: I was very tired when I wrote my first comment. A better way of putting it, would be to say i would love to have a one on one conversation with Dr. Peterson about his theory.
It's actually quite literally laid out across his lectures, if his reference to his lectures is anything to go by. Real quick: I'm not being a dick! It just seems it's actually the case, as he often says he tries his best to draw his conclusions from what he understands to be the prevalent and truest consensuses in science (even if it's at odds with laymen's theories, such as the concept of EQ vs IQ). I'm no psychologist, so I can't really vet him on it all, but that's his foundation. What he's built on top is his idea of the application of this science. To fully explain that, though, his lectures and long-form interviews are great places to start short of asking the man in an appropriate format yourself or maybe reading his books. I think all of that combined is his "theory" (of being, or how to be).
I actually had Jordan Peterson as a professor in Canada, in the 90s. He tried to teach us about Post Modernism. I and many others were also taking film 101. Petersons descriptions were so confusing that when we studied post modern film, the film prof has to schedule extra weekend lectures to un teach the garbage peterson taught and reteach the correct concepts of post modernism. The university had to discipline peterson for teaching garbage.
I am like him, a fractal memory. I even remember surprises from childhood and I kept the idea until I could discover their slot. I am Asperger's and I have a global idea where everything fits in. It extends as a fractal around, so it's not a list.
Does that allow for the theory to modify or outline change? And if you plug something in a slot, could the old slot become unappropriate once we plug a new bit of data? How does one account for this? I'd love to hear the answer. I'm 99th percentile trait openness but low conscientiousness. I'm a deeply intuitive thinker, but chaotic and disorganized.
Omg right. That’s so annoying when I can’t remember something well enough to even broadly explain what it was about but then if I’m asked a specific question suddenly I know the most irrelevant details.
This guy had to hear Peterson say no 8 times before he shut his mouth and let the interviewee speak and clarify what he does actually think. This guy has no business interviewing Katy Perry, much less Jordan Peterson
No, he has a strict ideology and belief system, and he makes note of things that support that belief system and discards things that don't. It's called confirmation bias.
@@heldinahtmlhellreally what evidence do you have to make a claim like that? There are many time where Jordan has stated that he has changed his mind, was surprised by the results, etc. there is also evidence that this information has altered his theory as well. So where do you get off with your claim.
@@heldinahtmlhell I can see how it seems like that's what he said, but I disagree. He plugs things he disagrees with into the theory as well, and if the results are unexpected, he changes the theory
I find a good way to remember information is to think of how you would explain it to someone else. It seems more personal after that and that seems to help.
He treats his mind like an infinite puzzle not a photo library it’s the way we gotta do it because we have limited ram and gotta be imaginative to solidify the importance of the information to recall it in a more thought out way
The photographic memory thing is amusing because it's indicative of how people who do not think like us, often perceive intelligence, and intellectualism, etc. So it shows how far they are in perceiving the true nature of such thought as ours. There's a large difference in possessing knowledge, and attaining understanding, and evaluating new thoughts, to flesh out the comprehension of reality, in all it's dimensions. So that the new take hold, and the old pass away.
@@regerbryan You seem insecure. Strange that you don't realize that there are some quite intelligent people using this site. Learn some humility What it seems like is that this person you're criticizing isn't shouting his intelligence but instead just stating a fact. Not every one in the comments section is average or an idiot. I get the sense that the OP is neither
@@regerbryan Abstract thinkers. If you want me to simplify it for you, it's scoring high in a personality trait called "openness." There are also subcategories of openness, which you can look up further. The way you understand things have to have some relevance, in that the concept you are discovering has to slot in with the general knowledge you already have, rather than being pure detail. This is what makes it abstract, and what I could probably even say is opposite to remembering specific details. It is somewhat ignorant that some people could think being high in openness in this particular manner means that you have photographic memory. The two are not remotely the same. And as I explained earlier, could probably even be called opposites.
That’s more or less how I read non fiction books! I love the way he articulates it. You can easily retain far more info by categorization of different aspects of the information itself!
Being a student of Jordan Peterson and Just listening to How Jordan Peterson talks and thinks it's clear he does not have a photographic memory which makes him even more extraordinary
Do you know how we can ask him questions?
Is he still giving lectures?
He has interesting things to say at times, but if strays into other fields that are not his areas of expertise all the time. If you look at what experts in those fields have to say about his claims in those areas, they’re frequently wrong. He’s really not all he’s cracked out to be
imagine listening to his psychotic ramblings and finding them extraordinary
Lucky you!!! He is an extra ordinary man. I wish I had the honour of being his student :)
The interviewer needed to shut up and ask the question 😅
Ik XD
The interviewer did a fine job. It's how he thinks
@@PagesofWisdom313 my thought exactly.
I can't stand the interviewer. He also sounds like every pastor ever.
This is a short TH-cam edited for a quick view. So he's not really jumping in or cutting Peterson in any way I would assume only
Some interviewers just like the sound of their own voice a little too much
Jumping to conclusions at it's finest
Have you ever watched a valuetainment interview before?
@@Dr.Spooky No. Judging by context I assume that’s a good thing?
@@Dr.Spooky yes, he still talks too much.
Ironically the first lesson in how to interview is to let the other person elaborate freely
Jordan Peterson just made me appreciate my own brain. What he described and physically acted out is how my own brain organizes things but I have so often tried to make it work differently. I also appreciate how he didn’t let the other guy tell him how his own brain worked; he stuck with what he knew about himself to be true.
I could tell this is how JBP thinks.
I've developed the same way with programming. Everything self directed and incorporated into a a sort of working model. Each new piece of info is either plugged in to expand the model, or the model adapts. Once you have this model, you can easily pull from it to answer questions, or just talk for hours as you explore different sections.
This this this thank you! Wanted to comment something like you said but couldn’t find the words.
So… HOW??
Never felt this understood before i swear
Does this process transcend professions and academics? Say if you have such a system for approaching a profession, that in itself is a micro compartment in a larger approach to life that also runs similarly.
@@ElvisismI reason to believe so. The model encapsulates all knowledge learned almost like a 3D puzzle. I want to know what lectures he’s referring to.
I cracked up at him trying to convince jordan that he has a photographic memory
Yes, I perceive and process basically the same as JP.
I always refer to my unifying theory as he sort of states it, as my jigsaw puzzle.
All experience, all information, I receive, I search for then reorganize and place the pieces to form the picture of all things together. There's always a place for everything, and nothing is left out. And I look at all layers of a thing, and try to understand their essence, and the fabric of all.
I see patterns in the pieces, and how every piece fits together, or at least that's the goal. It's a constant process, and my mind is often lost to the effort, and enjoyment of the process.
It's both straining, and highly enjoyable at times. I often know and understand things before others, and in deeper and further reaching ways.
I often am able to solve problems that others aren't even aware of, or if they are, in ways they do not consider.
I see answers that can only be seen, if you can see the grand picture.
I also recognize that my strength and ability therein, is both a gift, and curse, and that all forms of intelligence, and ability, have their important places, and roles.
I see myself as a speaker, a philosopher, an artist, an advisor, a problem solver, an innovator, a consultant, a visionary, etcetera.
I am one whose greatest work is on ideas and concepts, so from the outside it may seem that I do little work at all, but it hardly stops internally.
TI linked with SI.
@@jhinthevirtuoso4886 What's that?
I've come up INTP each time I did Myers Briggs test.
@@Frejborg Myers Briggs is pretty shit cognitive functions, and the type grid are more accurate to type yourself with.
@@Frejborg You have a massively over inflated ego, as well as delusions of grandeur. Seek therapy, I recommend cognitive behavioral therapy so you can learn the causes of your ego mania
Plugging knowledge into your own working model is a great way to go
Watching how he remains on point and doesn’t lose his thoughts are what I was watching for. He is charming kind and intelligent.
Smart, articulate & handsome... Wow
He's not leaving until jordan has photographic memory
So a theory that dr peterson has been working on for a longtime ! .. it always makes me smile if he says this .. i like that
He relates to life.. this is the best way to teach children.. they ask why tell tell them .. explain everything they want and let them figure out the rest on their own .. that’s how you end up with quick thinking.. you have to think for yourself. And be able to ask questions and decide the answer and outcome for yourself By making connections to your life and experiences. Then the information is easier to understand and decipher.
This man is brilliant!
My way of thinking exactly 🤩 somebody gets it
Jordon is such a brilliant mind. He is humble about it too
The piecing together he said at the end is EXACTLY how I think.
Best ways to organize the thoughts based on shared theory... every thing revolves around fundamental, once connect the subjects with fundamental concept that evolved and build and organize them...
The definition of introverted intuition
What mbtis have that?
@@KGS922 All the NJ's and SP's
Just a tidbit of information the "interviewer" is Patrick bet David and if you go to the full video you won't find anyone who says that he cuts Jordan off and asks him a million times about this. Because in the greater context of the conversation makes it obvious that it's not the case and this video cut out about 30% of this specific part of the conversation making it seem like he is cutting him off and being very persistent but due to the cuts and what seems to be a slight speed up i can see how it would give you that idea
So in other words, he just one up’d the photographic memory with his theory method 😂😂😂 genius
I kinda know that strategy I also use it
It is using an ideal model that fits everything
Peterson is able to compartmentalize with precision. A natural librarian. He sorts and categorizes, using subject to pigeonhole. In a sense, his thinking is like chain lightning, tying topics and references together into different pathways with each addition supporting the other in any argument or lessons, going places that few think to go. I don’t always like him or agree with him, but he’s brilliant, and that’s enough.
Jordan applies knowledge holisticly.
As long as it’s not conformation bias. We also need to let our awareness stand sentinel at the gates of our perception
Me too Jordan. Me too.
When we listen to people like this, with this much knowledge and such a good vocabulary, we instantly admire and want to be more like them than athletes, actors or singers 😂
This guy is so smart
I use the same approach - theory connectivity.
Shit, my eyes widened a little when he said that, I realize I think the exact same way. General concepts that are compartmentalized into the supporting evidences that build up the concept.
I found it was easier to hold a concept or view longer by doing this. Eventually, some piece of evidence (or even many pieces) come in that topple the entire things structure, and I have to build it up as a new thing, but this happens less and less as I keep adding more structured concepts. I guess it's how I am able to keep stability in my psyche, in a way.
Oooh. That might be it. I have a big picture mentality and people can marvel at what I remember. I call it a filing cabinet but I like Dr. P’s explanation. It fits the picture so I remember it almost pre cognitively.
I love Japes.
When complex emotions are involved, you have to organize knowledge in a complex way. Logic is just the start. Much more difficult and critical unbiased judgement is required
Well said Peterson
No, he doesn't have a photographic memory. He has a thinking memory, which is tenfold more amazing...
He works with logic and understand the logic of what he have read
WTF I literally organize my knowledge the same way, first time I hear someone mention that style of thinking
The funny thing here is WHY Jordan so vehemently said NO about how he organises himself when asked if he had a photographic memory, is that he knows that the interviewer in this video would attack anywhere he could see a potential political edge or leaning toward one side or another, probably because the interviewer wouldn't just shut up and ask the questions, kept interrupting and introducing new obstacles to any answer
I understand. Someone will ask me something and I gather all I know and it comes out very quick and factual. Don’t really know how.
He basically described a memory palace. Where the palace is his theory.
If Jordan’s fifty hours of lectures that contain his theory were all in one place and laid out logically, it would be a gold mine to access.
That is the secret to intelligence. Its not knowing things, its not being great at math or chess. Its the ability to more quickly combine data into correct conclusions, to combine things others would not have thought of to create something new or better.
Jordan Peterson has made being brilliant sexy and hip!!
I think peter speaking about mind mapping
There are some people try to be famous by interviewing famous and popular people.
Remembering a page is easy. I do it all the time.
Same as myself, well conceived unified theories efficiently integrate new information and are transformed when the axioms need to be shifted, otherwise, the axioms dictate how everything fits together.
I actually had Jordan Peterson as a professor in Canada, in the 90s. He tried to teach us about Post Modernism. I and many others were also taking film 101. Petersons descriptions were so confusing that when we studied post modern film, the film prof has to schedule extra weekend lectures to un teach the garbage peterson taught and reteach the correct concepts of post modernism. The university had to discipline peterson for teaching garbage.
@@johnnygoodman2003 His reachings about PM (which is a relatively minor topic compared to his primary specialization) might have been limited, as John V., I think, communicated to him (which may have led to changes), but overall it sounds like he was well rated as a lecturer. His available lectures appear to be more interesting and relevant than most of the psyc courses I can recall. In any case, academics scarcely agree with one another when they're devoted to specific frames of reference.
@@pneumaE that's just it. He teaches clinical psychology. He's was not supposed to dedicate 3 lectures to post modernism philosophy. But that year, that's what he did. He filled his lecture time with culture war garbage instead of the actual content on the curriculum.
Just described Zettelkasten
I would love to hear this "Theory" of Mr. Peterson 's
Edit: I was very tired when I wrote my first comment. A better way of putting it, would be to say i would love to have a one on one conversation with Dr. Peterson about his theory.
It's actually quite literally laid out across his lectures, if his reference to his lectures is anything to go by. Real quick: I'm not being a dick!
It just seems it's actually the case, as he often says he tries his best to draw his conclusions from what he understands to be the prevalent and truest consensuses in science (even if it's at odds with laymen's theories, such as the concept of EQ vs IQ). I'm no psychologist, so I can't really vet him on it all, but that's his foundation. What he's built on top is his idea of the application of this science. To fully explain that, though, his lectures and long-form interviews are great places to start short of asking the man in an appropriate format yourself or maybe reading his books.
I think all of that combined is his "theory" (of being, or how to be).
he's literally explaining being Introverted Intuitive dominant (INFJ) in mbti😅 same
I actually had Jordan Peterson as a professor in Canada, in the 90s. He tried to teach us about Post Modernism. I and many others were also taking film 101. Petersons descriptions were so confusing that when we studied post modern film, the film prof has to schedule extra weekend lectures to un teach the garbage peterson taught and reteach the correct concepts of post modernism. The university had to discipline peterson for teaching garbage.
There is something!
I'd like to learn more about Peterson's memory castle, to steal from "The Mentalist".
I came to try to understand how to organize my thoughts better and left more unorganized.
Where is that 50 hours lecture in online... I want to know how JP integrate and organize his knowledge
I am like him, a fractal memory. I even remember surprises from childhood and I kept the idea until I could discover their slot. I am Asperger's and I have a global idea where everything fits in.
It extends as a fractal around, so it's not a list.
Back when his suits were actually nice
I’m excited because maybe one day we will hear this complete theory …..
Me too
Ah, so he doesn't have a mind palace, he has a mind arbor. Awesome! Literally a grove full of trees of knowledge!😎👍
Does that allow for the theory to modify or outline change?
And if you plug something in a slot, could the old slot become unappropriate once we plug a new bit of data?
How does one account for this?
I'd love to hear the answer. I'm 99th percentile trait openness but low conscientiousness. I'm a deeply intuitive thinker, but chaotic and disorganized.
This sounds like extroverted thinking (Te - facts and details) vs introverted thinking (Ti - systems and theories)
Sounds like Jordan Peterson is a computer, Definitely a brilliant man
People that have photographic memory are really smart
he can see the puzzle
I think like Jordan
I envy people with photographic memory
But yeah, my brain is topical like Jordan's, which, I think is more practical in its own right
Which lecture is Dr Peterson referring to?
That interviewer is worth over 300m dollars , that's Pbd , he's no slouch.
He uses obsidian FYI
He just recognizes branches of his tree
This interviewer ALWAYS talks over his interviews
Thanks for letting me know, so that I never waste my time watching him again. Even for JP.
Same.
Some interviewers just seem to be impressed by the merely words that come out of their mouth...
Memory castle.
Anyone found the video to his theory?
Release the Craic-en
Can someone explain, because i didnt understand jp
anyone know the interview? thanks!
Interviewer wants to drop the TISM bomb.
Won’t work.
Because the TISM protects.
JP - INFJ w a well balanxed second function and possibly a little adhd in his organization & focus skills here.
(Just a theory 😅)
People are making Jordan Peterson some kind of messiah with special powers lol 😂
Interesting 🤔
Please, what's the theory?
Why does he keep trying to tell Dr. Peterson how he thinks or remembers things? Who tf does that?
Bruh when I read something it sometimes will come back during family feud, other than that I’m blank.
Omg right. That’s so annoying when I can’t remember something well enough to even broadly explain what it was about but then if I’m asked a specific question suddenly I know the most irrelevant details.
@@brittybee6615 the only thing that sticks in our memory is the useless information.
Similar to “so, what you’re saying is…”
Me too. What is that called?
"Do you have photographic memory?"
"OK how about now?"
LOL
you funny
😆😆😆
Lmao😂
lolllllllll(on pc) emoji take time
I bet that interviewer made a bet with someone that JP had photographic memory
Is that a play on words or just a coincidence? Lol
But I think that he didn’t
The bet was hefty for sure lmao 🤣
@@geo.ies93 hahaha For Sure and he damn Lost😅😅
Nah pbd is just like that
Jordan: No I'm not like that.
Interviewer: Well I kinda think you are.
Jordan: But I'm not.
Interviewer: I don't think so.
Lol
Interviewer was pretty annoying even in that shirt clip.
🙄🙄😬🤔😂😂
I know right…? As if then interviewer knows what goes on in Jordan’s brain. I can’t stop laughing
Hahaha! So funny.
it was scientifically proven that this interviewer doesn't know when to shut up.
But can you say, "Page 73..."? I thought you for sure had a photographic memory.
This guy had to hear Peterson say no 8 times before he shut his mouth and let the interviewee speak and clarify what he does actually think. This guy has no business interviewing Katy Perry, much less Jordan Peterson
He has a contextual memory as he makes those connections he is building extra pathway to that knowledge and connecting it to his overall context.
Very well put. I think you explained it very simply.
No, he has a strict ideology and belief system, and he makes note of things that support that belief system and discards things that don't. It's called confirmation bias.
@@heldinahtmlhellreally what evidence do you have to make a claim like that? There are many time where Jordan has stated that he has changed his mind, was surprised by the results, etc. there is also evidence that this information has altered his theory as well. So where do you get off with your claim.
That's what he's saying. And he's a religious nut who believes in a fictional being and scripture. @@mauzeking6661
@@heldinahtmlhell I can see how it seems like that's what he said, but I disagree. He plugs things he disagrees with into the theory as well, and if the results are unexpected, he changes the theory
Sounds like "mind mapping", thus it seems highly plausible.
Wow!!!! That’s actually very helpful insight! I also think I’m doing it on my walls… just now realized it.
So…basically, I AM Jordan Peterson! 😂😂😆😆
He said he put his theory online can any one name it
I find a good way to remember information is to think of how you would explain it to someone else. It seems more personal after that and that seems to help.
He treats his mind like an infinite puzzle not a photo library it’s the way we gotta do it because we have limited ram and gotta be imaginative to solidify the importance of the information to recall it in a more thought out way
The photographic memory thing is amusing because it's indicative of how people who do not think like us, often perceive intelligence, and intellectualism, etc. So it shows how far they are in perceiving the true nature of such thought as ours.
There's a large difference in possessing knowledge, and attaining understanding, and evaluating new thoughts, to flesh out the comprehension of reality, in all it's dimensions. So that the new take hold, and the old pass away.
“Like us” yea alright
Well put
@@regerbryan You seem insecure. Strange that you don't realize that there are some quite intelligent people using this site. Learn some humility
What it seems like is that this person you're criticizing isn't shouting his intelligence but instead just stating a fact. Not every one in the comments section is average or an idiot. I get the sense that the OP is neither
@@brandonpham8587 lmao no it wasn't.
@@regerbryan Abstract thinkers. If you want me to simplify it for you, it's scoring high in a personality trait called "openness." There are also subcategories of openness, which you can look up further.
The way you understand things have to have some relevance, in that the concept you are discovering has to slot in with the general knowledge you already have, rather than being pure detail. This is what makes it abstract, and what I could probably even say is opposite to remembering specific details.
It is somewhat ignorant that some people could think being high in openness in this particular manner means that you have photographic memory. The two are not remotely the same. And as I explained earlier, could probably even be called opposites.
Kant gives same advice: ask yourself "how can I categorize thing that I just have learned?"
That’s more or less how I read non fiction books! I love the way he articulates it. You can easily retain far more info by categorization of different aspects of the information itself!
How does one begin thinking the same way?
It's funny because the way he organizes himself is how I am studying his works 😅
The guy interviewing him is a doer, not a thinker.
He’s an NFT charlatan
@@bigmyke2008 he is ?
Yes and he’s worth over 100,000,000 dollars, which is because doers do the most and get the most. I say this as a thinker…
@@jakeb6043 Yes, I meant no insult.