WNBA Star Sue Bird Made as Little as $100K Per Season, But Says ‘The Money Is Around the Corner’

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 19

  • @chrisannesalvador
    @chrisannesalvador หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    LOL the fact that this video is only 10 days old and people in these comments are STILL saying that no one watches women's sports after viewership/engagement numbers came out is crazy. Just say you hate women and don't want to watch them play sports.

  • @wisethabrain1100
    @wisethabrain1100 หลายเดือนก่อน

    100k free housing..free car! she's ungrateful

  • @skidamerica
    @skidamerica หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    100k to play ball is a great salary for people who can’t even dunk

    • @d.e.b.b5788
      @d.e.b.b5788 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Dunking is over rated. Any tall person can do it, even me, at 6'4". No big deal. Now, draining a 35' shot, that takes talent and plenty of skill and LOTS of practice.

  • @RobHunziger
    @RobHunziger หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The gaslighting is off the chart. You have to generate revenue to get paid more. It's cognitive dissonance. Your subsidized by NBA for 30 years. Caitlin Clark is the reason for the interest this year because she generates revenue. It's just embarrassing how they refuse to acknowledge that.

    • @lorenspagnuolo6892
      @lorenspagnuolo6892 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      exactly.

    • @d.e.b.b5788
      @d.e.b.b5788 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think it's just an extension of what women have expected forever; they grow up being told that they are little princesses, and that daddy will take care of everything. And they never grow out of that; they still expect men to pony up and pay for them. Sports? 'DADDY, I wanna play basketball and make millions, can you give us the money?' Same as always. They come to men and just expect men to give them money. Women live in a fantasy world. The best example is, the women who preach that they don't need men. UNTIL.... they do need hard, difficult, sometime deadly tasks to be done, and all of a sudden, they revert to being little girls again.

  • @Yuan-lo3zz
    @Yuan-lo3zz หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Boohoo. You made 100k to put a ball in a hoop in a league that made no profit and had limited viewership, whilst the everyday worker can't even stiff a salary close to that. Cry wolf somewhere else.

  • @vooteimer1234
    @vooteimer1234 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    You guys know nobody watches the WNBA right? Why should they even make 100k?

  • @lorenspagnuolo6892
    @lorenspagnuolo6892 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is disrespectful of women to claim this pay equity thing. Men's LEAGUES MAKE MORE MONEY. Fact. Second, where is Sue and her partner Megan on supporting biological women's sports? The hypocrisy is ridiculous.

    • @d.e.b.b5788
      @d.e.b.b5788 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Women won't go to watch women's sports. So much for equality; they want MEN to pay for them.

    • @chrisannesalvador
      @chrisannesalvador หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sue Bird has part ownership of the Seattle Storm (WNBA) and the NJ/NY Gotham FC (NWSL). Megan Rapinoe is an investor for the new Unrivaled Basketball League.

    • @lorenspagnuolo6892
      @lorenspagnuolo6892 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@chrisannesalvador thankyou.

  • @outlaw7x77
    @outlaw7x77 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Nobody cares about sue bird.

    • @d.e.b.b5788
      @d.e.b.b5788 หลายเดือนก่อน

      She was a terrific point guard for a long time. Problem is, she expects men to be the primary audience, and men prefer to watch the more athletic men's sports. When we watch sports, we see ourselves in those athletes. That can't happen with female athletes, and, women won't go to pay to watch other women in sports. There simply isn't enough interest. Caitlin is making a difference, but she's only one person. You need several hundred really TOP players, and they aren't there yet.

  • @Eaglefeathers84
    @Eaglefeathers84 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My girl Sue Bird!!

  • @MilanGulbayevna
    @MilanGulbayevna หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pink night 33